<<

Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health

CO- OF ADENOVIRUS, AND TORQUE TENO IN STOOLS OF PATIENTS WITH ACUTE

Meng-Bin Tang1#, Chia-Peng Yu2#, Shou-Chien Chen3,4 and Chien-Hsien Chen2

1Department of Family Medicine, Wei-Gong Memorial Hospital, Toufen Township, Miaoli County; 2Department of Bioengineering, Tatung University, Taipei; 3General Education Center, Tatung University, Taipei; 4Department of Family Medicine, Da-Chien General Hospital, Miaoli City, Miaoli County, Taiwan

Abstract. Up to now, there has been no report of co-infection of torque teno virus (TTV) with other enteric playing a role in the pathogenesis of viral acute gastroenteritis (AGE). We investigated the proportion, epidemiological and clinical features of concurrent of adenovirus (ADV), norovirus (NV) and TTV in stools of 155 patients with AGE attending Wei-Gong Memorial Hospital, Miaoli City, Taiwan. The presence of the three viruses were determined using PCR-based assays. Some 55% of the patients were infected with at least 1 enteric virus, among whom 18% were co-infected, NV and TTV being the most common (62%). Rate of co-infectious in AGE patients is correlated statistically significantly (p < 0.05) with age, fever and drinking of spring water. Furthermore, AGE children with co- infection have a higher hospitalization rate (69%). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of ADV, NV and TTV triple co-infection in children (2) with AGE. This study also revealed that TTV co-infection promoted the pathogenicity of other infectious agents. Keywords: acute gastroenteritis, adenovirus, co-infection, norovirus, torque teno virus, Taiwan

INTRODUCTION countries (Hodges and Gill, 2010). An es- timated 211-375 million episodes of acute Viral gastroenteritis is one of the gastroenteritis (AGE) occur annually in most frequently encountered illnesses in the United States, the majority of which children and adults worldwide (Eckardt are considered to have a viral etiology and Baumgart, 2011). It is estimated that (Thielman and Guerrant, 2004; Ismaeel viral gastroenteritis is the cause of 30%- et al, 2007). There are more than 20 types of 40% of infectious cases in developed viruses known to cause AG, among which Correspondence: Chien-Hsien Chen, Depart- norovirus (NV) and adenovirus (ADV) fre- ment of Bioengineering, Tatung University, quently are associated with AGE (Hall et al, Number 40, Sec. 3, Zhongshan N. Road, Taipei 2012; Chhabra et al, 2013), and torque teno 10452, Taiwan. virus (TTV) is highly prevalent in patients Tel: +886 (2) 21822928 ext 6311 with AGE (Pinho-Nascimento et al, 2011). E-mail: [email protected] Based on antigenic and genetic prop- #These authors contributed equally to this erties, NV, a member of the work. family, is classified into 5 (I-V) genogroups

1326 Vol 45 No. 6 November 2014 Coinfection of Viral Agents in Stool

(Patel et al, 2009), with genogroups I, II viral co-infection prevalence in hospital- and IV being associated with human infec- ized patients with AGE and to investigate tions (La Rosa et al, 2007). Although NV age distribution, seasonal trend and clini- is associated with epidemics and sporadic cal characteristics of gastrointestinal viral AGE cases across all age groups, it causes co-infections among children and adults more severe clinical manifestations in in Taiwan. young children and the elderly than in other age groups (Bernard et al, 2014). MATERIALS AND METHODS ADV belongs to the family, usually affecting children younger Case definition than 2 years and symptomatic adult in- AGE patients were defined as those fections are uncommon (Blacklow and with clinical (≥3 loose stools Greenberg, 1991). Although ADVs are within a 24 hour period), which may be primarily recognized as pathogens of accompanied by , , respiratory, ocular or genitourinary infec- , and . tions, serotypes 31, 40 and 41 can cause Specimen collection AGE (Matsushima et al, 2011). Previous Stools of 155 AGE patients attending studies have suggested that ADV-related Wei-Gong Memorial Hospital, Miaoli cases might occur more commonly in the County were stored at -20°C and trans- second half of the year (in Brazil), espe- ferred to the Department of Bioengineer- cially in children (Filho et al, 2007). ing, Tatung University, Taipei City where TTV is a member of the they were stored as a 10% suspension in family, and has been classified into at least a balanced solution at -70°C until as- five groups consisting of more than 27 sayed (Tang et al, 2013). This study was genotypes as the result of an extremely conducted from August 2011 to July 2012 wide range of sequence divergence ob- at Wei-Gong Memorial Hospital. Patients served among TTV isolates (Peng et al, were given a follow-up questionnaire the 2002). TTV is common in asymptomatic week after enrolment to obtain the epide- and AGE patients. miological features and clinical symptoms Up till now there has not been any re- and to ascertain that AGE had occurred. port of co-infections of NV, ADV and TTV This study was approved by the Human in children and adults with AGE, espe- Subject Research Ethics Committee of cially in developing countries. In Taiwan, the Wei-Gong Memorial Hospital, Miaoli two studies on NV or ADV in AGE among County (approval no. 100003). Informed children have been conducted, indicating written consent was obtained from adult viral enteric co-infections in 13.1% of hos- participants and parents of minors. pitalized children with AGE (Chen et al, Viral DNA/RNA extraction 2013; Tsai et al, 2014). As TTV and NV are Nucleic acid was extracted from not able to be cultured (Hino and Miyata, 200 µl of 10% fecal suspension using a 2007; Thorne and Goodfellow, 2014), co- viral nucleic acid extraction kit (Geneaid, infections cannot be demonstrated by in New Taipei City, Taiwan) according to the vitro studies. manufacturer’s instructions. Extracted Therefore, this study was performed DNA/RNA was stored in 50 µl of RNase- using molecular methods to determine free H2O at -20°C until assayed.

Vol 45 No. 6 November 2014 1327 Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health

RT-PCR detection of NV and Hex2 (5’-CCCTGGTA(GT)CC(AG) RT-PCR was performed separately AT(AG)TTGTA-3’) primers (Ko et al, using 10 µl nucleic acid, 10 µl of one-step 2003), 0.5 µl of 10 mM dNTPs, 0.25 µl of RT-PCR master mic (Qiagen, Taipei City, Taq DNA polymerase (15 U/µl, IT’S Sci- Taiwan), 0.5 µl (10 µM) of JV12 (5’ATAC- ence Corp, Taipei, Taiwan), and 2 µl of 10X CACTATGATGCAGATTA-3’, nt. no. buffer (500 mM Tris-HCl, pH 9.2, 160 mM

4552-4572) and JV13 (5’-TCATCATCAC- ammonium sulfate, 25 mM MgCl2, and 1% CATAGAAAGAG-3’, nt. no. 4878-4858) Tween 20). Thermocycling was performed primers (Vinje and Koopmans, 1996), as follows: 94°C for 5 minutes; 40 cycles 4 µl buffer (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany), of 94°C for 1 minute, 50°C for 1 minute, µ µ 0.4 l (10 mM) of dNTPs, 3.8 l of H2O, and 72°C for 2 minutes; with a final step and 0.8 µl (1.25 U/µl) of enzyme mix of 72°C for 5 minutes. Amplicons (482 bp) (RTase; Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). The were analyzed as described above. The thermocycling conditions (conducted in second round PCR was performed as in Thermo Electron Corp) were as follows: the first round PCR except that primers 50°C for 30 minutes; 95°C for 15 minutes; Hex 1 (5’-TTCCCCATGGCICACTAA- 40 cycles at 94°C for 30 seconds, 37°C for CAC-3’) and Hex 3 (5’-AGGAACCA(AG) 1 minute, and 72°C for 1 minute; followed TCCTTTAGGTCAT-3’) (Ko et al, 2003), by a final step at 72°C for 10 minutes. The and 1 µl from the first round PCR reaction amplicons were analyzed by 2% agarose were used. Thermocycling was reduced gel-electrophoresis at 100 V for 30 minutes to 30 cycles and amplicons (443 bp) were and visualized under UV light after stain- analyzed as described above. ing with ethidium bromide. Semi-nested PCR detection of TTV The amplicons were genotyped by Semi-nested PCR was performed in DNA sequencing. NVs were identified a 25 µl reaction volume containing 10 based on the 327 nucleotide sequences µl of RNase-free water, 5 µl of template of the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase DNA, 0.5 µl of 10 µM NG133 (5’-GTA- (RdRp) region. All NV sequences were AGTGCACTTCCGAATGGCTGAG-3’) analyzed using the basic local alignment and NG147 (5’-GCCAGTCCCGAGCCC- search tool (BLAST) and DNAMAN soft- GAATTGCC-3’) primers (Okamoto et al, ware. Phylogenetic trees with 1000 boot- 1999), 0.5 µl of 10 mM dNTPs, 2.5 µl of strap replicates were generated using the Taq DNA polymerase (5 U/µl, IT’S Science neighbor-joining method by employing Corp, Taipei City, Taiwan), and 2.5 µl of molecular evolutionary genetics analysis 10X buffer (500 mM Tris-HCl, pH 9.2, 160 (MEGA), version 5.0. Reference strains mM ammonium sulfate, 25 mM MgCl were downloaded from the GenBank. 2, and 1% Tween 20). Thermocycling was Only bootstrap values >65 were consid- performed as follows: 95°C for 9 minutes; ered significant. 35 cycles of 94°C for 30 seconds, 58°C Semi-nested PCR detection of ADV for 30 seconds, and 72°C for 45 seconds; Semi-nested PCR, was performed with a final step of 72°C for 7 minutes. in a 25 µl reaction volume contain- Amplicons (143 bp) were analyzed as ing 17 µl of RNase-free water, 2 µl of described above. The second round PCR template DNA, 1.5 µl of 10 µM Hex1 was performed as in the first round PCR (5’-TTCCCCATGGCICACTAACAC-3’) except that primers NG134 (5’-AGTTTTC-

1328 Vol 45 No. 6 November 2014 Coinfection of Viral Agents in Stool

Viral infections Coinfections ADV in 7 (4.5%) samples. N=86 (86/155=55.5%) ADV N=16 (16/155=10.3%) 1 (1.2%) TTV was detected in all NV 5 (5.8%) co-infections, together with NV in 10 (62.5%) samples, ADV+TTV 4 (25%) with ADV in 4 cases and Coinfection TTV 16 (18.6%) NV+TTV with both NV, and ADV in 64 (74.4%) 10 (62.5%) NV+ADV+ 2 cases. TTV 2 (12.5%) TTV infection was more prevalent in sum- mer (June to August) and AB autumn (September to No- vember, whereas NV infec- Fig 1–Distribution of single and co-infections of enteric viruses tion occurred more com- among 86 patients with acute gastroenteritis (A) and of dif- ferent virus combinations among the 16 co-infected cases (B). monly in the autumn and Virus was detected from stool sample using PCR-based assay winter (December to Febru- as described in Materials and Methods. ADV, adenovirus; ary) and ADV was detected NV, norovirus; TTV, torque teno virus. sporadically throughout the year without any obvi- ous seasonal trends (Fig 2). CACGCCCGTCCGCAGC-3’) and NG132 NV and ADV single infections and (5’-AGCCCGAATTGCCCCTTGAC-3’) TTV co-infection were more prevalent in (Okamoto et al, 1999), and 2.5 µl from children aged 2-10 years, whereas TTV co- the first round PCR reaction were used. infections were lowest in the 10-20 years Thermocycling was reduced to 25 cycles group (Fig 3). There is no statistically and amplicons (110 bp) were analyzed as significant differences in virus infection described above. prevalence among females with single Statistical analysis and co-infections (Table 1). Prevalence of AGE patients with co-infection is not Chi-square test was used to examine statistically significant p( < 0.05) in the differences in proportions between groups, age group ≤ 10 years and drank spring and a p < 0.05 is considered statistically water. AGE patients with co-infection significant. Fisher’s exact tests were used have statistically significant (p < 0.05) when the expected value was lower than higher fever (≥ 38°C) compared to those 5. The odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence with single infection. However, both interval (CI) were calculated when p < 0.05. groups of patients did not differ in the occurrences of vomiting or abdominal RESULTS pain. The 3 target enteric virus (NV, ADV Among the 16 patients with co-infec- and TTV) were detected in 86/155 (55.5%) tion, 11 (69%) had fever, 15 (94%) were of the stool samples, including 70 (45%) in-patients, 11 of whom were children single viral infections and 16 (10.3%) viral (Table 2). Furthermore, co-infections in co-infections (Fig 1). TTV was identified all age groups were observed in only 9 in 80 (51.5%) of the cases, NV in 17 (11%) months of the year (the exceptions being cases, of which all were NV GII.4, and May, July and August).

Vol 45 No. 6 November 2014 1329 Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health

70 90

80 enteric virus, mainly TTV 60 or NV. TTV was the most 70 50 common enteric virus de- 60 tected similar to a previous 40 50 study (Pinho-Nascimento 40

Sample number 30 Positive rate (% ) et al, 2011). Braham et al 30 20 (2009) have shown that TTV 20 could be spread by fecal-oral 10 10 route, resulting

0 0 in its spread among the pop- AutumnWinter Spring Summer ulation at large. Sample number TTV NV ADV Coinfection  The 11% NV-infected Fig 2–Seasonal distribution of ADV, NV and TTV infection in AGE patients in this study patients with acute gastroenteritis. Virus was detected were similar to those pre- from stool sample using PCR-based assay as described viously reported in Taiwan in Materials and Methods. ADV, adenovirus; NV, noro- (Yang et al, 2010) and Australia virus; TTV, torque teno virus. (Marshall et al, 2003). DNA sequences of the 443 bp am- 70 80 plicon from the RNA-depen-

60 70 dent RNA polymerase gene

60 revealed that 17 NV samples 50 belonged to GII.4 strain, the 50 40 same as in the previous AGE 40 30 outbreak in Taiwan in 2009 Sample number 30 Positive rate (% ) (Lai et al, 2013). The 2006 ep- 20 20 idemic strain in Taiwan was

10 10 GII.4-2006b and that of 2010

0 0 pandemic GII.4-New Orleans <2 2~10 10~20 20~40 40~60 >60 strain. The current finding in Sample number TTV NV ADV Coinfection our patients of NV GII.4 var-   iant strain that is implicated Fig 3–Age group distribution of ADV, NV and TTV infection in sporadic AGE worldwide in patients with acute gastroenteritis. Virus was detected (Ramani et al, 2014) indicates from stool sample using PCR-based assay as described its global spread. in Materials and Methods. ADV, adenovirus; NV, noro- ADV is highly infectious virus; TTV, torque teno virus. and can easily become wide spread (Chen et al, 2013). However, until now, reports DISCUSSION on ADV infections in Taiwan are limited (Tebruegge and Curtis, 2012). The preva- To the best of our knowledge, this is lence of ADV infection in AGE patients in the first description of triple co-infection our investigation was similar to precious of NV, ADV and TTV in AGE patients. studies (Rodriguez et al, 1985; LeBaron Over 50% of patients with diarrhea in et al, 1990; Huhulescu et al, 2009; Kittigul this study were infected with at least 1 et al, 2013). ADV is a rare cause of AGE

1330 Vol 45 No. 6 November 2014 Coinfection of Viral Agents in Stool

Table 1 Demographical and clinical data of patients with AGE.

Demographical and clinical data Coinfection Monoinfection p-valuea OR CI

Females (%) 50% (8/16) 37.1% (26/70) - - - Age <10 years (%) 68.8% (11/16) 12.9% (9/70) <0.0001 14.911 4.197-52.980 Autumn 43.8% (7/16) 24.3% (17/70) - - - Winter 25% (4/16) 31.4% (22/70) - - - Spring water (%) 25% (4/16) 4.8% (3/62) 0.029 6.556 1.297-33.143 Patients suffering of fever (%) 73.3% (11/15) 35.7% (25/70) 0.01 4.95 1.426-17.181 Patients suffering of vomiting (%) 31.3% (5/16) 23.5% (16/68) - - - Patients suffering of abdominal 56.3% (9/16) 61.2% (41/67) - - - pain (%) aOnly significant p-value (<0.05) reported. bOR, odds ratio; cCI, confidence interval. in adults, but we have detected ADV in co-infecting virus that promotes the path- stools from 5 children and 2 adult AGE ogenic effects of other infectious agents cases. However, ADV can cause a variety (Okamoto et al, 2001; Maggi et al, 2003; of infectious diseases, such as respiratory Szladek et al, 2005). In our study TTV was disease, epidemic keratoconjunctivitis, present in all co-infections. Thus clinicians hemorrhagic cystitis, and gastroenteritis and researchers should consider the pos- (Shimada et al, 2004). sible presence of viral co-infection in the It still needs to be elucidated whether etiology of AGE and monitor a broader co-infection of TTV with other intestinal range of enteric viruses. tract viruses play a role in the pathogen- A study has indicated that esis of viral AGE. The majority (62.5%) infections were positive for NV or ADV in of co-infection was of NV and TTV, but AGE patients are significantly associated there were 2 cases involving NV, ADV with various clinical symptoms, such as and TTV. Co-infections of NV GII.4 and low-grade fever, vomiting and depletion enteric viruses ( and rotavirus) (Ferreira et al, 2012). We observed fever have been reported (Dai et al, 2011; Li was the most frequent clinical symptom et al, 2012), suggesting that NV GII.4 is among the co-infected patients (OR = a frequent strain co-infecting with other 4.95). Thus fever is a risk factor and may types of enteric viruses. During co-in- be used by clinicians for clinical diagnosis fection, the pathogenic potential of each of co-infected AGE patients. virus type appears to be enhanced leading Climate change is likely to contribute to a worsening of the patients’ clinical to the burden of infectious diseases. In this manifestation (Liu et al, 2006; Bhavnani study, most NV infections occurred dur- et al, 2012), a situation that is similar to ing late autumn and winter, as has been this study, in which the number of hos- observed in other countries (Dai et al, 2010; pitalized AGE children with co-infection Inaida et al, 2013). On the other hand, TTV was higher than those who were out-pa- infections occurred more commonly in tients. Furthermore, previous studies have summer and autumn. ADV infections oc- suggested that TTV virus in particular is a curred more commonly in autumn. Thus

Vol 45 No. 6 November 2014 1331 Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health + + + + + + + + + + + + Norovirus

+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + TT Virus

+ + + + + + Adenovirus

symptoms

Gastrointestinal Fever AP Fever AP vomiting, Fever, Fever Fever, AP Fever AP Fever, Fever - AP Vomiting, AP vomiting, Fever, AP AP Vomiting, vomiting Fever, AP Fever, Table 2 Table water Tap water Tap water Spring water Spring water Spring water Spring water Tap Spring water water Tap water Tap water Tap water Tap water Tap water Tap water Tap water Tap water Tap Type of drinking Type status Patient Inpatient Inpatient Inpatient Inpatient Inpatient Inpatient Inpatient Inpatient Inpatient Inpatient Inpatient Inpatient Outpatient Onpatient Inpatient Inpatient Sep Oct Oct Oct Nov Nov Oct Dec Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr Apr Apr Jun Month of collection Age 2-10 2-10 2-10 <2 2-10 40-60 2-10 >60 <2 >60 2-10 2-10 20-40 <2 <2 20-40 AP, abdominal pain; +, positive. +, pain; abdominal AP,

group (y) group Demographical, clinical and virological data of the norovirus ,adenovirus and TTV co-infected patients. co-infected TTV and ,adenovirus norovirus the of data virological and clinical Demographical, M F F F M M F M M M F M F F F M Sex No. 10 25 27 31 40 44 45 49 56 84 107 122 161 171 197 229 M male; F, female; M male; F, a

1332 Vol 45 No. 6 November 2014 Coinfection of Viral Agents in Stool the most frequent viral infection, single underestimated because other pathogens or co-infection occurred in the autumn. of AGE were not analysed and a small Among children and adults with TTV number of AGE fecal samples were inves- infection, 73% were younger than 2 years tigated. Secondly, some important clinical of age and there are a peak in NV and ADV and virological information, such as de- positive cases in children between 2 and hydration, duration of diarrhea episode 10 years, suggesting that the immature (day), length of hospitalization (day) and immune system in children makes them viral concentration were lacking, which more susceptible to enteric virus infections made it difficult to calculate the disease than adults. That AGE-related co-infection severity of patients in greater detail. is statistically more common in children In summary, this study is the first < 10 years of age compared to other age report of NV, ADV and TTV co-infection groups (OR = 14.9) indicates that young in children and adults with AGE. Such children are at greater risk of enteric virus co-infection was found more among hos- co-infections. Furthermore, previous co-in- pitalized than out-patient AGE children. fection in AGE is associated with a more Risk factors for AGE-related co-infection severe clinical course in children (Valentini included age, drinking of spring wa- et al, 2013). As noted above, there were ter and fever. As TTV co-infection can more in-patient children with co-infection promote the pathogenic effects of other than out-patient children. Therefore, viral infectious agents, it is suggested that in- co-infected children represent a subgroup vestigations of enteric virus co-infection of AGE patients who need to be paid atten- and in patients with gastro- tion by attending clinicians for appropriate intestinal symptoms could be useful to treatment. better identify viral agents responsible Tang et al (2013) have indicated that for AGE, to understand the route of trans- AGE-related NV infections are significant- mission and the interactions among these ly related to the consumption of spring viruses. water. In this study, viral co-infection in AGE patients is significantly associated ACKNOWLEDGMENTS with the consumption of spring water (OR = 6.6), indicating that spring water This study was supported by a grant is a potential source for transmission of (WG 100-I-003) from the Wei-Gong Me- AGE-related NV. morial Hospital and in part by a grant There are at least two important fea- (B103-S02-O11) from Tatung University, tures of this study. Firstly, all clinical de- Taiwan. The authors are grateful to all our partments of the study hospital adopted colleagues in the Department of Labora- a uniform case definition by which AGE tory, Wei-Gong Memorial Hospital for patients were enrolled and a common their help in the collection of specimens, questionnaire was used to record the pa- and to Su-Chuen Lin for assistance in data tients’ history. Secondly, all three common collection and cataloging. enteric virus were analyzed in each stool sample, allowing detection of single and REFERENCES co-infections. However, the study has a number of weaknesses. Firstly, the total Bernard H, Hohne M, Niendorf S, Altmann D, proportion of viral co-infection was likely Stark K. Epidemiology of norovirus gas-

Vol 45 No. 6 November 2014 1333 Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health

troenteritis in Germany 2001-2009: eight de Janeiro and Salvador, Brazil. J Med seasons of routine surveillance. Epidemiol Microbiol 2007; 56(Pt 3): 313-9. Infect 2014; 142: 63-74. Hall AJ, Eisenbart VG, Etingue AL, Gould LH, Bhavnani D, Goldstick JE, Cevallos W, Trueba Lopman BA, Parashar UD. Epidemiology G, Eisenberg JN. Synergistic effects be- of foodborne norovirus outbreaks, United tween rotavirus and coinfecting patho- States, 2001-2008. Emerg Infect Dis 2012; gens on diarrheal disease: evidence from a 18: 1566-73. community-based study in northwestern Hino S, Miyata H. Torque teno virus (TTV): Ecuador. Am J Epidemiol 2012; 176: 387-95. current status. Rev Med Virol 2007; 17: Blacklow NR, Greenberg HB. Viral gastro- 45-57. . N Engl J Med 1991; 325: 252-64. Hodges K, Gill R. Infectious diarrhea: Cellular Braham S, Iturriza-Gomara M, Gray J. De- and molecular mechanisms. Gut Microbes tection of TT virus by single-primer 2010; 1: 4-21. sequence-independent amplification in Huhulescu S, Kiss R, Brettlecker M, et al. multiple samples collected from an out- Etiology of acute gastroenteritis in three break of gastroenteritis. Arch Virol 2009; sentinel general practices, Austria 2007. 154: 981-5. Infection 2009; 37: 103-8. Chen SY, Tsai CN, Chen CL, et al. Severe viral Inaida S, Shobugawa Y, Matsuno S, Saito R, gastroenteritis in children after sub-opti- Suzuki H. The south to north variation mal rotavirus immunization in Taiwan. of norovirus epidemics from 2006-07 to Pediatr Infect Dis J 2013; 32: 1335-9. 2008-09 in Japan. PLoS One 2013; 8(8): Chhabra P, Payne DC, Szilagyi PG, et al. Etiol- e71696. ogy of viral gastroenteritis in children <5 Ismaeel AY, Al Khaja KA, Damanhori AH, years of age in the United States, 2008- Sequeira RP, Botta GA. Management of 2009. J Infect Dis 2013; 208: 790-800. acute diarrhoea in primary care in Bah- Dai YC, Hu GF, Zhang XF, et al. Molecular rain: self-reported practices of doctors. J epidemiology of norovirus gastroenteritis Health Popul Nutri 2007; 25: 205-11. in children in Jiangmen, China, 2005-2007. Kittigul L, Pombubpa K, Taweekate Y, Yeephoo Arch Virol 2011; 156: 1641-6. T, Khamrin P, Ushijima H. Molecular Dai YC, Xia M, Zhan HC, et al. Surveillance characterization of , norovi- and risk factors of norovirus gastroenteri- ruses, sapovirus, and adenoviruses in tis among children in a southern city of patients with acute gastroenteritis in China in the fall-winter seasons of 2003- Thailand. J Med Virol 2013; 81: 345-53. 2006. J Paediatr Child Health 2010; 46: 45-50. Ko G, Cromeans TL, Sobsey MD. Detection of Eckardt AJ, Baumgart DC. Viral gastroenteritis infectious adenovirus in cell culture by in adults. Recent Pat Antiinfect Drug Discov mRNA reverse -PCR. Appl 2011; 6: 54-63. Environ Microbiol 2003; 69: 7377-84. Ferreira CE, Raboni SM, Pereira LA, Nogueira La Rosa G, Fontana S, Di Grazia A, Iaconelli MB, Vidal LR, Almeida SM. Viral acute M, Pourshaban M, Muscillo M. Molecu- gastroenteritis: clinical and epidemiologi- lar identification and genetic analysis of cal features of co-infected patients. Braz J Norovirus genogroups I and II in water Infect Dis 2012; 16: 267-72. environments: comparative analysis Filho EP, da Costa Faria NR, Fialho AM, of different reverse transcription-PCR et al. Adenoviruses associated with acute assays. Appl Environ Microbiol 2007; 73: gastroenteritis in hospitalized and com- 4152-61. munity children up to 5 years old in Rio Lai CC, Wang YH, Wu CY, Hung CH, Jiang DD,

1334 Vol 45 No. 6 November 2014 Coinfection of Viral Agents in Stool

Wu FT. A norovirus outbreak in a nursing variants classifiable into the fourth and home: norovirus shedding time associ- fifth genetic groups, isolated from viremic ated with age. J Clin Virol 2013; 56: 96-101. infants. Arch Virol 2002; 147: 21-41. LeBaron CW, Furutan NP, Lew JF, et al. Viral Pinho-Nascimento CA, Leite JP, Niel C, Diniz- agents of gastroenteritis. Public health Mendes L. Torque teno virus in fecal importance and outbreak management. samples of patients with gastroenteritis: MMWR Recomm Rep 1990; 39(RR-5): 1-24. prevalence, genogroups distribution, and Li XL, Li DD, Cheng WX, et al. [Molecular and viral load. J Med Virol 2011; 83: 1107-11. epidemiological study on among children Ramani S, Atmar RL, Estes MK. Epidemiology under 5 years old in Nanjing]. Zhonghua of human and updates on Shi Yan He Lin Chuang Bing Du Xue Za Zhi development. Curr Opin Gastro- 2012; 26: 14-7. enterol 2014; 30: 25-33. Liu C, Grillner L, Jonsson K, et al. Identification Rodriguez WJ, Kim HW, Brandt CD, et al. of viral agents associated with diarrhea in Fecal adenoviruses from a longitudinal young children during a winter season in study of families in metropolitan Wash- Beijing, China. J Clin Virol 2006; 35: 69-72. ington, D.C.: laboratory, clinical, and Maggi F, Marchi S, Fornai C, et al. Relation- epidemiologic observations. J Pediatr ship of TT virus and Helicobacter pylori 1985; 107: 514-20. infections in gastric tissues of patients Shimada Y, Ariga T, Tagawa Y, Aoki K, Ohno S, with gastritis. J Med Virol 2003; 71: 160-5. Ishiko H. Molecular diagnosis of human Marshall JA, Hellard ME, Sinclair MI, et al. adenoviruses d and e by a phylogeny- Incidence and characteristics of endemic based classification method using a par- Norwalk-like virus-associated gastroen- tial hexon sequence. J Clin Microbiol 2004; teritis. J Med Virol 2003; 69: 568-78. 42: 1577-84. Matsushima Y, Shimizu H, Phan TG, Ushijima Szladek G, Juhasz A, Kardos G, et al. High H. Genomic characterization of a novel co-prevalence of genogroup 1 TT virus human adenovirus type 31 recombinant and human papillomavirus is associated in the hexon gene. J Gen Virol 2011; 92(Pt with poor clinical outcome of laryngeal 12): 2770-5. carcinoma. J Clin Pathol 2005; 58: 402-5. Okamoto H, Nishizawa T, Takahashi M, Asabe Tang MB, Chen CH, Chen SC, Chou YC, Yu CP. S, Tsuda F, Yoshikawa A. Heterogeneous Epidemiological and molecular analysis distribution of TT virus of distinct geno- of human norovirus infections in Taiwan types in multiple tissues from infected during 2011 and 2012. BMC Infect Dis humans. Virology 2001; 288: 358-68. 2013; 13: 338. Okamoto H, Takahashi M, Nishizawa T, et al. Tebruegge M, Curtis N. Adenovirus: an over- Marked genomic heterogeneity and view for pediatric infectious diseases spe- frequent mixed infection of TT virus cialists. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2012; 31: 626-7. demonstrated by PCR with primers from Thielman NM, Guerrant RL. Clinical practice. coding and noncoding regions. Virology Acute infectious diarrhea. N Engl J Med 1999; 259: 428-36. 2004; 350: 38-47. Patel MM, Hall AJ, Vinje J, Parashar UD. Thorne LG, Goodfellow IG. Norovirus gene Noroviruses: a comprehensive review. J expression and replication. J Gen Virol Clin Virol 2009; 44: 1-8. 2014; 95 (Pt2): 278-21. Peng YH, Nishizawa T, Takahashi M, Ishikawa Tsai CN, Lin CY, Lin CW, Shih KC, Chiu T, Yoshikawa A, Okamoto H. Analysis of CH, Chen SY. Clinical relevance and the entire of thirteen TT virus genotypes of circulating noroviruses in

Vol 45 No. 6 November 2014 1335 Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health

northern Taiwan, 2006-2011. J Med Virol tured viruses in outbreaks of gastroenteri- 2014; 86: 335-46. tis in the Netherlands. J Infect Dis 1996; Valentini D, Vittucci AC, Grandin A, et al. 174: 610-5. Coinfection in acute gastroenteritis Yang LC, Chiang PC, Huang TH, et al. Resi- predicts a more severe clinical course in dents had an increasing risk of norovirus children. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis gastroenteritis infection than health care 2013; 32: 909-15. workers during an outbreak in a nurs- Vinje J, Koopmans MP. Molecular detection ing home. J Am Med Direct Assoc 2010; and epidemiology of small round-struc- 11: 592-7.

1336 Vol 45 No. 6 November 2014