• Abstract and Figures
• Public Full-text

Geological Magazine New detrital zircon U–Pb insights on the www.cambridge.org/geo palaeogeographic origin of the central Sanandaj–Sirjan zone, Iran 1,2,3 1 4 4 Original Article Farzaneh Shakerardakani , Franz Neubauer , Xiaoming Liu , Yunpeng Dong , Behzad Monfaredi5 and Xian-Hua Li2,3,6 Cite this article: Shakerardakani F, Neubauer F, Liu X, Dong Y, Monfaredi B, and 1 – Department of Geography and Geology, Paris-Lodron-University of Salzburg, Hellbrunner Str. 34, A-5020 Salzburg, Li X-H. New detrital zircon U Pb insights on the 2 palaeogeographic origin of the central Austria; State Key Laboratory of Lithospheric Evolution, Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of 3 Sanandaj–Sirjan zone, Iran. Geological Sciences, Beijing 100029, China; Innovation Academy for Earth Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 4 Magazine https://doi.org/10.1017/ 100029, China; State Key Laboratory of Continental Dynamics, Department of Geology, Northwest University, S0016756821000728 Northern Taibai Str. 229, Xi’an 710069, China; 5Institute of Earth Sciences – NAWI Graz Geocenter, University of Graz, Universitätsplatz 2, Graz 8010, Austria and 6College of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of Chinese Received: 10 February 2021 Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China Revised: 20 June 2021 Accepted: 22 June 2021 Abstract Keywords: New detrital U–Pb zircon ages from the Sanandaj–Sirjan metamorphic zone in the Zagros oro- Iranian microcontinent; Sanandaj–Sirjan metamorphic zone; U–Pb geochronology; genic belt allow discussion of models of the late Neoproterozoic to early Palaeozoic plate tec- detrital zircon; North Gondwana; tonic evolution and position of the Iranian microcontinent within a global framework. A total of palaeobiogeography 194 valid age values from 362 zircon grains were obtained from three garnet-micaschist sam- ples. The most abundant detrital zircon population included Ediacaran ages, with the main age Author for correspondence: peak at 0.60 Ga. Other significant age peaks are at c. 0.64–0.78 Ga, 0.80–0.91 Ga, 0.94–1.1 Ga, Farzaneh Shakerardakani, – – Email: [email protected] 1.8 2.0 Ga and 2.1 2.5 Ga. The various Palaeozoic zircon age peaks could be explained by sedi- ment supply from sources within the Iranian microcontinent. However, Precambrian ages were found, implying a non-Iranian provenance or recycling of upper Ediacaran–Palaeozoic clastic rocks. Trace-element geochemical fingerprints show that most detrital zircons were sourced from continental magmatic settings. In this study, the late Grenvillian age population at c. 0.94–1.1 Ga is used to unravel the palaeogeographic origin of the Sanandaj–Sirjan metamorphic zone. This Grenvillian detrital age population relates to the ‘Gondwana superfan’ sediments, as found in many Gondwana-derived terranes within the European Variscides and Turkish ter- ranes, but also to units further east, e.g. in the South China block. Biogeographic evidence proves that the Iranian microcontinent developed on the same North Gondwana margin extending from the South China block via Iran further to the west. 1. Introduction The Gondwana supercontinent is the result of large-scale amalgamation of continents and microcontinents located within East and West Gondwana. Amalgamation started at the end of the Neoproterozoic period, which led to the formation of the East African orogen (e.g. Stern, 1994; Collins & Pisarevsky, 2005; Stampfli et al. 2013; Meinhold et al. 2013) and conse- quently records the first stage in the development of the Transgondwanan Supermountain (Squire et al. 2006). From the northern margin of Gondwana, major terranes split off during Palaeozoic time (Şengör, 1990 and references therein), moved to the north and were accreted to the Eurasian margin during Triassic and Cenozoic times (e.g. Agard et al. 2011; Abbo et al. 2015; Hassanzadeh & Wernicke, 2016; Stephan et al. 2019). Understanding the exact origin of these Gondwana-derived terranes along the Gondwana margin has been a major geological challenge in the last decade (e.g. Stampfli et al. 2013; von Raumer et al. 2013; Stephan et al. 2019; Žák et al. 2021; Fig. 1). Although most of the Neoproterozoic palaeogeographic reconstructions place the Iranian © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge microcontinent along the Prototethyan margin of northern Gondwana, which is close to the University Press. This is an Open Access article, East African orogen (e.g. Hassanzadeh et al. 2008; Horton et al. 2008; Fergusson et al. distributed under the terms of the Creative 2016), some new age information and the tectonic setting of the Neoproterozoic rocks indicate Commons Attribution licence (http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which that the Iranian microcontinent was originally part of a series of peri-Gondwanan terranes, sim- permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and ilar to the Avalonian (640–540 Ma) and Cadomian (616–540 Ma) arc terranes (e.g. Murphy reproduction, provided the original article is et al. 2004; Moghadam et al. 2020b; Fig. 1). properly cited. The age and nature of the continental crust in Iran have been documented during previous research, including zircon U–Pb ages published over the last two decades that demonstrate the dominance of Pan-African continental crustal material in the Iranian microcontinent, recording widespread late Neoproterozoic subduction-related magmatism (e.g. Ramezani & Tucker, 2003; Hassanzadeh et al. 2008; Rahmati-Illkchi et al. 2011; Jamshidi Badr et al. 2013; Nutman et al. Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 170.106.35.229, on 01 Oct 2021 at 12:13:46, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0016756821000728 2 F Shakerardakani et al. Fig. 1. (Colour online) (a) Present-day map showing Gondwana-derived units (GDUs) and further terranes within the Alpine–Himalaya collision orogen (modified from Stampfli et al. 2013). GDUs and further terranes mentioned: AL– Alborz; ZG – Zagros; CI – Central Iran; KD – Kopet Dagh; AS – Arabian Shield; NS – Nubian Shield; SSMZ – Sanandaj–Sirjan metamorphic zone; Tu – Turan; Ba – Badakshan; SKu – South Kunlun; NQi – North Qilian; Qi – Qilian; Qa – Qaidam; EKu – East Kunlun; Er – Erlangping; Qin – Qinling; Da – Dabie. Light yellow – post-460 Ma formations; dark green – Hunia terrane (H); light blue – Gondwana. 2014; Shakerardakani et al. 2015; Fergusson et al. 2016; Moghadam (2020) suggested sediment supply from the Permian–Triassic mag- et al. 2018, 2020b). Recent research on amphibolites in the central matic rocks of the Silk Road Arc further north. The Neoproterozoic Sanandaj–Sirjan metamorphic zone (SSMZ) identified and Palaeoproterozoic zircons have predominantly rounded Neoarchaean xenocrystic zircons that revealed the presence of hid- shapes suggesting recycling of older sedimentary rocks den Neoarchaean crustal components in Iran (Shakerardakani (Meinhold et al. 2020). In NE Iran, the Ordovician to Lower et al. 2019). Devonian sandstones are characterized by distinct age groups at In addition, detrital zircon data from Neoproterozoic, 2.5 Ga, 0.6–0.8 Ga, 0.5 Ga and 0.4–0.5 Ga, as well as a minor age Palaeozoic and Triassic clastic sediments have recently become peak at 1.0 Ga (Moghadam et al. 2017). available from many different portions of the Iranian microconti- In this paper, we carry out, for the first time, a coupled U–Pb age nent, such as from the central Alborz, Zagros, northwestern and trace-element analysis of detrital zircons from three garnet- Central Iranian terrane and NE Iran (e.g. Horton et al. 2008; micaschist samples (primarily Neoproterozoic–early Palaeozoic Etemad-Saeed et al. 2015; Honarmand et al. 2016; Zhang et al. in age) distributed along a ~100 km long central segment of the 2017; Moghadam et al. 2017; Meinhold et al. 2020; Zoleikhaei SSMZ in the Zagros orogenic belt (Fig. 1). For the interpretation et al. 2020). of our results, we integrate our new data with the previously pub- Previous detrital zircon studies indicated that the dominant age lished detrital zircon U–Pb data from other Precambrian– population in the upper Neoproterozoic–Cambrian sandstones Palaeozoic clastic sediments throughout the Alborz, Central Iran from the Kahar, Bayandor, Barut, Lalun and Mila formations of and NE Iran. We juxtapose the new detrital U–Pb zircon data with the Alborz and Zagros mountains is Neoproterozoic, with a main biogeographic evidence to constrain the position of the Iranian age peak at 0.6 Ga as well as minor peaks at 1.0 Ga, 1.8 Ga and microcontinent on the northern Gondwana margin and its relation 2.5 Ga (Horton et al. 2008). In the central Alborz Mountains, to the global framework as was recently also postulated by Yang alongside the youngest, prominent (0.55–0.56 Ga) detrital zircon et al.(2020) and Merdith et al.(2021). We show that the SSMZ population, 0.9–1.0 Ga, 2.0–2.2 Ga, 2.5–2.7 Ga and 2.9–3.2 Ga as part of the Iranian microcontinent bears similar detrital zircon age populations appear in the Neoproterozoic sandstones from age spectra to those known from the Arabian–Nubian shield, in the Kahar Formation (Etemad-Saeed et al. 2015). In addition, peri-Gondwanan terranes to the west of Iran as well as to those Cambrian sandstones of the Lalun Formation reveal similar reoc- of the South China block in the east. curring age clusters as observed in the Kahar Formation, domi- nated by Cryogenian–Ediacaran ages, with pre-Neoproterozoic 2. Geological background and Cambrian zircon grains a minor component (Zoleikhaei et al. 2020). Some Neoproterozoic sandstones from the Kahar Iran is regarded as a fragment of Gondwana and comprises several and Bayandor formations in Central Iran are dominated by blocks or domains, e.g. the Alborz and Zagros mountain belts, the 0.62–0.64 Ga zircon ages, with minor age populations at Central Iranian plateau and the Kopet Dagh Mountains, that are 0.82 Ga, 0.92–0.94 Ga, 1.9–2.3 Ga and 2.5–3.0 Ga (Honarmand separated by deep-seated faults or suture zones (e.g.

Load more

  22

Copy Link