2020 Sollfrank Etal Beautifulw
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Minor Compositions Open Access Statement – Please Read This book is open access. This work is not simply an electronic book; it is the open access version of a work that exists in a number of forms, the traditional printed form being one of them. All Minor Compositions publications are placed for free, in their entirety, on the web. This is because the free and autonomous sharing of knowledges and experiences is important, especially at a time when the restructuring and increased centralization of book distribution makes it difficult (and expensive) to distribute radical texts effectively. The free posting of these texts does not mean that the necessary energy and labor to produce them is no longer there. One can think of buying physical copies not as the purchase of commodities, but as a form of support or solidarity for an approach to knowledge production and engaged research (particularly when purchasing directly from the publisher). The open access nature of this publication means that you can: • read and store this document free of charge • distribute it for personal use free of charge • print sections of the work for personal use • read or perform parts of the work in a context where no financial transactions take place However, it is against the purposes of Minor Compositions open access approach to: • gain financially from the work • sell the work or seek monies in relation to the distribution of the work • use the work in any commercial activity of any kind • profit a third party indirectly via use or distribution of the work • distribute in or through a commercial body (with the exception of academic usage within educational institutions) The intent of Minor Compositions as a project is that any surpluses generated from the use of collectively produced literature are intended to return to further the development and production of further publications and writing: that which comes from the commons will be used to keep cultivating those commons. Omnia sunt communia! Support Minor Compositions / Purchasing Books The PDF you are reading is an electronic version of a physical book that can be purchased through booksellers (including online stores), through the normal book supply channels, or Minor Compositions directly. Please support this open access publication by requesting that your university or local library purchase a physical printed copy of this book, or by purchasing a copy yourself. If you have any questions please contact the publisher: [email protected]. !"#$%#&'!()'*$+&,,(-,. !"#$%&'"()%)*+,-./0)*,)%,+$", !1"%+234).*+,5"%+6.2 !"#$%"&'(&)*+,%-#.&/*--0+.,1 Te Beautiful Warriors. Technofeminist Praxis in the Twenty-First Century Edited by Cornelia Sollfrank ISBN 978-1-570-27-365-0 Cover design by Cornelia Sollfrank and Janine Sack, based on a visual from the performance À la recherche de l’information perdue (Sollfrank, 2018) Interior layout by Margaret Killjoy Released by Minor Compositions 2020 Colchester / New York / Port Watson Minor Compositions is a series of interventions & provocations drawing from autonomous politics, avant-garde aesthetics, and the revolutions of everyday life. Minor Compositions is an imprint of Autonomedia www.minorcompositions.info | [email protected] Distributed by Autonomedia PO Box 568 Williamsburgh Station Brooklyn, NY 11211 www.autonomedia.org [email protected] /-0!#0!. 1234563$7$7$7$7$7$7$7$7$7$7$7$7$7$7$7$7$7$7$7$7$7$7$7$7$7$7$7$ 8 Cornelia Sollfrank Translated by Valentine A. Pakis )39:;:<=$"56>:;?7 777777777777777777 8@ Resistance through Spaciality Sophie Toupin /235=:;?$03A$+B2CD< 777777777777777 EF With Cyberfeminist Ideas and Practices Text compiled by Spideralex Translated by Cornelia Sollfrank /BD3<$B4$/B;DG6=777777777777777777 FH Transforming Shared Values into Daily Practice Femke Snelting !I3$)39:;:<=$12:;6:JC3<$B4$=I3$(;=32;3=$7 HE or the personal_collective story of imagining and making #feministinternet Text by hvale vale )39:;:<=$12:;6:JC3<$B4$=I3$(;=32;3=$K$ L32<:B;$M7N$77777777777777777777777 OE Author: Association for Progressive Communication APC Publication date: August 2016 L:25C$1324B295;63<$B4$P3;D32$7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 O@ Christina Grammatikopoulou !36I;BQ#6B439:;:<9 777777777777777 888 Nonhuman Sensations in Technoplanetary Layers Yvonne Volkart Translated by Rebecca van Dykes .=:22:;?$=I3$#9R32<$777777777777777 8EH Preliminary Critical Notes on Xenofeminisms Isabel de Sena %:B<7777777777777777777777777777 8S@ 1,#)&/# 5&.%"7)/,8&77'./%9 3+.,4-.$%"&'(&5.-%,$#,%&67&8.1#4 “We have to become practiced in warfare. Tat means nothing less than fghting for certain worlds and against others – for particular ways of living and being in the world, and not others. And this is exactly what it means to revolt. To be for certain things and against others is a sort of “war of the worlds,” but it is war as part of a proposition for peace, a proposition that is not without danger. […] We are still able to change things, but the time to act is short. And we will know all too soon whether there can be peace at all.” – Donna Haraway “Tere’s no need to fear or hope, but only to look for new weapons.” – Gilles Deleuze 2 9&&::&&3;%&<%.=$#0=-&>.++#*+4 “Men and things exchange properties and replace one another; this is what gives technological projects their full savor.” –Bruno Latour “Te new planetary consciousness will have to rethink machinism.” – Félix Guattari “Pick up again the long struggle against lofty and privileged abstraction. Perhaps this is the core of revolutionary process.” – Adrienne Rich What relation do technology and gender have with one an- other? How are they mutually produced in ever-new confgurations? Can they even be thought of as two separate categories? And is it not necessary to bring a series of additional agents into play in order to provide a more complete picture? Tis volume brings together a selection of current technofeminist positions from the felds of art and activism. Since the cyberfeminism of the 1990s, new ways of thinking and acting have proliferated, of- ten as a reaction to new forms and dimensions of exploitation and discrimination. Issues have expanded from a purely informational di- mension and its emancipatory potential into a material dimension. Questions of technology are now bound together with questions of ecology and the economy. Online and ofine are no longer separate spheres, but have rather become a single continuum. Art may func- tion symbolically with images, metaphors, and narratives, but it also crosses and partially obscures the limits of activism. For its part, activ- ism is an expression of protest against technocapitalist excess – it is an efort to pursue new tools, instruments, and places to enable common activity, common learning, and common unlearning. Despite the great variety of existing positions, there is nevertheless something that binds them together; they all negotiate gender politics with reference to technology, and they all understand their praxis as an invitation to take up their social and aesthetic interventions, to carry on, and never 8+%0.?%&&::&&@ give up. Tose involved are diverse: activists and collectives working under pseudonyms, but also artists and other producers of knowl- edge both within and outside of academic disciplines. Teir practices are networked, but often in the stratifed, parallel universes of inter- national art scenes, academic theory and research (primarily in the global North), political activism (primarily in the global South), and the techno-underground. To gather such diverse views into a single volume is to traverse many territories and cross many borders – all to pursue the possibility of thinking and acting in common. Te term technofeminism serves to designate these diverse practices but also – through their proximity in this book – to bring them into contact and encourage exchange. Coined in Judy Wajcman’s book of the same name,1 the concept denotes speculative and queer positions that – both in theory and in practice – question the coded relation between gender and technology. Wajcman locates technofeminism at the intersection of science and technology studies (STS) and feminist technology studies. In particular, technofeminism is interested in ex- amining how gender relations and the hierarchy of sexual diference infuence scientifc research and technological innovation and how the latter, in turn, infuence the constitution of gender. Translated into technofeminist practices in everyday life, this means no less than struggling for a more just and livable world for everyone in today’s technoscientifc culture. Troughout, Donna Haraway looms in the background. More than 30 years ago, we learned from her that there is hardly any chance of living outside of technologies – this was not something that she lamented but, on the contrary, always understood as an opportunity. Accordingly, her feminist critique of the technosciences did not lead to an anti-scientifc or technophobic attitude. Rather, it called for a more comprehensive, robust, and true science; a science with clear points of view; and a reconceptualization of science and technology to serve emancipatory ends. Haraway made essential contributions to the deconstruction of scientifc knowledge as historically patriar- chal, and she demonstrated that science and technology are close- ly linked to capitalism, militarism, colonialism, and racism. At the heart of her anti-essentialist approach is the critique of the alleged objectivity of scientifc knowledge. Instead of understanding science 1 Judy Wajcman, TechnoFeminism (Cambridge, UK: Polity, 2004). A&&::&&3;%&<%.=$#0=-&>.++#*+4 as disembodied truth, Haraway stresses its social aspects, including its potential to create narratives. According to Judy Wajcman, “For Haraway science is culture in an unprecedented sense. Her central concern is to expose the “god trick,” the dominant view of science as a rational, universal, objective, non-tropic system of knowledge.”2 Tis entails questioning dichotomous categories such as science/ideology, nature/culture, mind/body, reason/emotion, objectivity/ subjectivity, human/machine, and physical/metaphysical on the basis of their in- herent hierarchical functions.