DOCSLIB.ORG

Articles UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED the Case of Case the Setting the the Setting Issue 2009-U UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED Pioneers of National Reconnaissance Raymond E

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Articles UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED the Case of Case the Setting the the Setting Issue 2009-U UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED Pioneers of National Reconnaissance Raymond E UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED National Reconnaissance: Journal of The Discipline and Practice The Journal of National Reconnaissance: Winter 2009/2010 Issue 2009-U Articles Protecting Sources and Methods versus the Public’s Right to Know: Setting the Winter 2009/2010 Issue 2009-U Terms for a More Constructive Discussion By Jock Stukes From Camp Incarceration to U.S. National Reconnaissance: The Case of Two Americans of Japanese Ancestry—NRO Pioneer Sam Araki and Former DDNRO Dr. F. Robert Naka By Susan D. Schultz, Ph.D. NRO | MSC UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED 10-07500 SPINE/FOLD UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED Pioneers of National Reconnaissance Raymond E. Anderson (2008) Fred V. Hellrich (2006) John Parangosky (2000) M. Sam Araki (2004) A.J. Iorillo (2001) Robert L. Paulson (2002) James G. Baker (2000) Robert Kaemmerer (2004) Julius P. Peline (2000) C. Lee Battle, Jr. (2000) Paul G. Kaminski (2007) Robert M. Powell (2000) John T. Bennett (2000) Frederick H. Kaufman (2000) Wayne L. Proffitt (2005) Howard G. Brotherton (2008) David L. Klinger (2006) David Raspet (2003) John W. Browning (2000)§ Robert J. Kohler (2000) Edward H. Reese (2000) Jon H. Bryson (2000) Ellis E. Lapin (2000) Osmond J. Ritland (2000)§ A. Roy Burks (2000) Lloyd K. Lauderdale (2000)§ Lee W. Roberts (2000)§ Frank S. Buzard (2000) Richard S. Leghorn (2000) Vincent S. Rose (2001) James P. Campbell (2009)§ Walter J. Levison (2000)§ Charles R. Roth (2000)§ Cornelius W. Chambers (2000) Howard O. Lorenzen (2000)§ Robert W. Roy (2000) Ingard M. Clausen (2006) Frank J. Madden (2000) Charles P. Spoelhof (2000) Vance D. Coffman (2002) Michael F. Maguire (2009) Forrest H. Stieg (2000) Harvey Cohen (2004) James T. Mannen (2000) Marvin S. Stone (2000) Lacy G. Cook (2009) Roger C. Marsh (2005) James W. Stoner (2003) John O. Copley (2000) Paul W. Mayhew (2000) Don F. Tang (2000) Donald L. Cromer (2001) Reid D. Mayo (2000) Charles C. Tevis (2003)§ Robert H. Crotser (2000) James W. McAnally (2004) John Walton (2001)§ John J. Crowley (2000)§ Edward A. Miller (2005) Albert D. Wheelon (2000) James C. de Broekert (2000) James E. Morgan (2000)§ Peter G. Wilhelm (2000) Robert E. Eisenhauer (2005) Mark N. Morton (2000)§ Sun Yet Wong (2007) Carl L. Ferdensi, Jr. (2003) Alden V. Munson, Jr. (2000) Jane A. Wood (2006) Gary S. Geyer (2000) Charles L. Murphy (2000) Roy H. Worthington (2000) Thomas O. Haig (2000) Frederic C.E. Oder (2000)§ Robert W. Yundt (2000) Lee M. Hammarstrom (2002) Hilliard W. Paige (2008) Founders of National Reconnaissance William O. Baker (2000) Richard L. Garwin (2000) Frank W. Lehan (2000)§ Merton E. Davies (2000) Amrom H. Katz (2000)§ William J. Perry (2000) Sidney D. Drell (2000) James R. Killian, Jr. (2000)§ Edward M. Purcell (2000)§ Edwin H. Land (2000)§ Legacy Alphabetic Program Directors Lew Allen, Jr. (Program A) Leo Geary (Program D) Nathan J. Lindsay (Program A) Bernard L. Bailey (Program D) Robert K. Geiger (Program C) Vernon L. Lowrance (Program C) Thomas C. Betterton (Program C) Robert E. Greer (Program A) John L. Martin, Jr. (Program A) David D. Bradburn (Program A) Frederick J. Harlfinger, II (Program C) Lee Roy Patterson (Program C) Dennis M. Brooks (Program C) Frank W. Hartley, Jr. (Program D) Clason B. Saunders (Program D) Julian Caballero, Jr. (Program B) R. Evans Hineman (Program B) Herbert Scoville, Jr. (Program B) Robert T. Darcy (Program C) Ralph H. Jacobson (Program A) Huntington D. Sheldon (Program B) Leslie C. Dirks (Program B) William G. King (Program A) Jay W. Sprague (Program C) Carl E. Duckett (Program B) John E. Kulpa, Jr. (Program A) Rufus L. Taylor (Program C) Eugene B. Fluckey (Program C) Jack C. Ledford (Program B) Grover M. Yowell (Program C) DNROs, DDNROs, and PDDNROs of National Reconnaissance Edward C. Aldridge, Jr. (DNRO) Ralph S. Haller (PDDNRO) Brockway McMillan (DNRO) Richard M. Bissell, Jr. (DNRO) Jeffrey K. Harris (DNRO) F. Robert Naka (DDNRO) Bruce A. Carlson (DNRO) Robert J. Hermann (DNRO) Ellen M. Pawlikowski (DDNRO) Joseph V. Charyk (DNRO) Jimmie D. Hill (DDNRO) James W. Plummer (DNRO) Charles W. Cook (DDNRO) Donald M. Kerr (DNRO) James Q. Reber (DDNRO) Martin C. Faga (DNRO) Eugene P. Kiefer (DDNRO) Thomas C. Reed (DNRO) Dennis D. Fitzgerald (PDDNRO) David A. Kier (DDNRO) Betty J. Sapp (PDDNRO) Alexander H. Flax (DNRO) Scott F. Large (PDDNRO, DNRO) John T. Sheridan (DDNRO) Donald L. Haas (DDNRO) Hans Mark (DNRO) Robert D. Singel (DDNRO) Keith R. Hall (DDNRO, DNRO) Susan K. Mashiko (DDNRO) Peter B. Teets (DNRO) John L. McLucas (DNRO) § Honored Posthumously UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED NATIO N A L RECO nn AISSA N C E unclassified Editorial Staff Editor Robert A. McDonald, Ph.D. Managing Editor Susan D. Schultz, Ph.D. Assistant Managing Editor Patrick D. Widlake Editorial Support Sharon K. Moreno Design & Layout Media Services Center The Center for the Study of National Reconnaissance (CSNR) publishes National Reconnaissance — Journal of the Discipline and Practice for the information, education, and use of the broader national security community, especially those government and contractor personnel who are involved with national reconnaissance. Our objective is to promote dialogue among these professionals and to identify lessons for them by facilitating a synthesis of the technical, operational, and policy components that define and shape the enterprise of national reconnaissance. Disclaimer: The information in National Reconnaissance may not necessarily reflect the official views of the National Reconnaissance Office, the Intelligence Community, the Department of Defense, or any other U.S. Government entity. Contributions: We on the editorial staff invite authors from the NRO and the extended Intelligence Community — both current government and contractor employees, as well as alums — to submit scholarly articles, commentaries, and book reviews for publication consideration. Your articles for National Reconnaissance may address any doctrinal, theoretical, operational, or historical aspect of the discipline and practice of national reconnaissance. Center for the Study of National Reconnaissance (CSNR): The CSNR is an independent NRO research body that reports to the NRO Deputy Director, Business Plans and Operations. Our primary objective is to ensure that NRO leadership has the analytical framework and historical context to make effective policy and programmatic decisions. We accomplish our mission by promoting the study, dialogue, and understanding of the discipline, practice, and history of national reconnaissance. We chronicle the past, analyze the present, search for lessons for the future, and identify models of excellence that are timeless. Correspondence: You should direct all correspondence related to National Reconnaissance to: Center for the Study of National Reconnaissance National Reconnaissance Office/BPO 14675 Lee Road Chantilly, VA 20151 703-488-4733 Internet: [email protected] ISSN 1557-0304 ii unclassified unclassified NATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE JOUrnAL OF THE DISCIPLINE And Pr ACTICE Winter 2009/2010 Issue 2009-U Columns 1 Editor’s Commentary Articles 7 Protecting Sources and Methods versus the Public’s Right to Know: Setting the Terms for a More Constructive Discussion Jock Stukes Jock Stukes of the National Reconnaissance Office (NRO) Office of Inspector General discusses the challenges and complexities of properly classifying and declassifying intelligence information, where the need to protect vital national security secrets by limiting data dissemination seems in conflict with the principle of the public’s right to know what its government is doing. The Obama administration has given the discussion heightened visibility by making information disclosure a policy priority, with the President calling for greater transparency and accountability in government. The White House’s 21 January 2009 memo on the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) stated, “All agencies should adopt a presumption in favor of disclosure…to usher in a new era of open government.” In this article, Stukes examines the policies governing data classification and explains the difficulties NRO and Intelligence Community (IC) staffs have with complying with FOIA and Mandatory Declassification requests. He argues that contrary to charges by public interest groups that the IC must be forced to reveal any details about its activities, the IC agencies actually have initiated most of the substantive public disclosures of intelligence information, and their failure to meet mandated response times on some FOIA or declassification actions results more from lack of resources than from deliberate non-compliance. unclassified iii NATIO N A L RECO nn AISSA N C E unclassified 27 From Camp Incarceration to U.S. National Reconnaissance: The Case of Two Americans of Japanese Ancestry–NRO Pioneer Sam Araki and Former DDNRO Dr. F. Robert Naka Susan D. Schultz, Ph.D. Using the mass internment of Japanese-Americans during World War II as historical backdrop, Dr. Susan D. Schultz, Chief of Research, Studies, and Analysis at the Center for the Study of National Reconnaissance (CSNR), relates the experiences of national reconnaissance pioneer Sam Araki and former NRO Deputy Director Robert Naka, both interned as youths in wartime relocation camps, to highlight their innovative and lasting contributions to a national reconnaissance capability. Dr. Schultz reviews the historical record to show how the U.S. government established a policy enabling it to forcibly remove and incarcerate any alien or citizen of Japanese ancestry without trial or due process
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Jack Boyd and Hans Mark
    INSIGHT | ASK MAGAZINE | 35 From Masters with Masters: Jack Boyd and Hans Mark In August 2012, NASA Chief Knowledge Officer and Academy of Program/Project and Engineering Leadership Director Ed Hoffman sat down with Hans Mark, from the University of Texas at Austin, and NASA’s Jack Boyd at the Ames Research Center as part of the Academy’s Masters with Masters series. Dr. Mark has held several roles, including NASA deputy administrator, Ames center director, chancellor of the University of Texas, secretary and undersecretary of the air force, director of the National Reconnaissance Office, and director of research and engineering at the Department of Defense. Jack Boyd has worked at Ames for more than sixty years and is the senior advisor to the Ames center director. He has been the NASA associate administrator for management, and has also served as the acting deputy center director for Ames. Ames engineers (left to right) Allen Faye, Merrill Mead, and Jack Boyd discuss aircraft design and handling. Photo Credit: NASA/Ames Research Center 36 | ASK MAGAZINE retneh Ccraeses RemA/ASA: Ntidero CtohP Ntidero RemA/ASA: Ccraeses retneh At a farewell party for Dr. Hans Mark, Ames center director from 1969 to 1977, are (left to right) Alan Chambers, Dale Compton, Jack Boyd, Hans Mark, Lloyd Jones, and John Dusterberry. Hoffman: How did you start working together? should NASA be doing today to be able to respond to a time where there is a lot of uncertainty? Boyd: I got a call from the about-to-be administrator, Jim Beggs, saying he had this young fella he wanted me to show Mark: Many people sitting in this room today remember the around Ames.
    [Show full text]
  • Old Soldiers by Michael Riordan
    Old soldiers by Michael Riordan Twenty years ago this month, an this deep inelastic region in excru­ experiment began at the Stanford ciating detail, the new quark-parton Linear Accelerator Center in Cali­ picture of a nucleon's innards fornia that would eventually redraw gradually took a firmer and firmer the map of high energy physics. hold upon the particle physics com­ In October 1967, MIT and SLAC munity. These two massive spec­ physicists started shaking down trometers were our principal 'eyes' their new 20 GeV spectrometer; into the new realm, by far the best by mid-December they were log­ ones we had until more powerful ging electron-proton scattering in muon and neutrino beams became the so-called deep inelastic region available at Fermilab and CERN. where the electrons probed deep They were our Geiger and Marsd- inside the protons. The huge ex­ en, reporting back to Rutherford cess of scattered electrons they the detailed patterns of ricocheting encountered there-about ten times projectiles. Through their magnetic the expected rate-was later inter­ lenses we 'observed' quarks for preted as evidence for pointlike, the very first time, hard 'pits' inside fractionally charged objects inside hadrons. the proton. These two goliaths stood reso­ Michael Riordan (above) did The quarks we take for granted lutely at the front as a scientific research using the 8 GeV today were at best 'mathematical' revolution erupted all about them spectrometer at SLAC as an entities in 1967 - if one allowed during the late 1960s and early MIT graduate student during them any true existence at all.
    [Show full text]
  • GENERAL BERNARD A. SCHRIEVER AIR FORCE ASSOCIATION LOS ANGELES CHAPTER 147 from the President…
    GENERAL BERNARD A. SCHRIEVER AIR FORCE ASSOCIATION LOS ANGELES CHAPTER 147 From the President…. Dear Members of the AFA General Bernard A. Schriever Los Angeles Chapter: The missions of your Air Force Association are to Educate the public on the importance of Aerospace Power; to Advocate Aerospace Power to the public and to our elected repre- sentatives; and to Support the Air Force and the Air Force family. The Schriever Chapter tends to emphasize the Support mission, through varied forms of philanthropy (AFROTC grants, Enlisted and Company Grade Officer scholarships, donations to the Los Angeles Air Force Spouses’ Club, donations to local high schools competing in AFA’s CyberPatriot initia- tive, and many others), and by annually recognizing the outstanding achievements of the men and women of the Space & Missile Systems Center. This quarter the chapter was very active in both the education and the recognition as- pects of the Support mission, as detailed in several articles below. We honored AFROTC ca- dets at UCLA and Community College of the Air Force (CCAF) graduates at SMC. We pre- sented the Schriever Award to Secretary of the Air Force Michael B. Donley, and a Schriever Fellowship Award to SMC Vice Commander Brig Gen Roger W. Teague, as part of the annual AFA Salute to SMC. In addition, the Chapter Board of Directors elected Marcia Peura to the Board as the new Chapter Secretary, and she is doing a great job. Marcia takes over from Barby Kollenda, who retired from Lockheed Martin and from the Board last year, but volunteered to stay on until we could find a replacement – no small task, as Barby has flawlessly handled a number of disparate tasks for the chapter during her years of service.
    [Show full text]
  • Copyright by Paul Harold Rubinson 2008
    Copyright by Paul Harold Rubinson 2008 The Dissertation Committee for Paul Harold Rubinson certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: Containing Science: The U.S. National Security State and Scientists’ Challenge to Nuclear Weapons during the Cold War Committee: —————————————————— Mark A. Lawrence, Supervisor —————————————————— Francis J. Gavin —————————————————— Bruce J. Hunt —————————————————— David M. Oshinsky —————————————————— Michael B. Stoff Containing Science: The U.S. National Security State and Scientists’ Challenge to Nuclear Weapons during the Cold War by Paul Harold Rubinson, B.A.; M.A. Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas at Austin in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Texas at Austin August 2008 Acknowledgements Thanks first and foremost to Mark Lawrence for his guidance, support, and enthusiasm throughout this project. It would be impossible to overstate how essential his insight and mentoring have been to this dissertation and my career in general. Just as important has been his camaraderie, which made the researching and writing of this dissertation infinitely more rewarding. Thanks as well to Bruce Hunt for his support. Especially helpful was his incisive feedback, which both encouraged me to think through my ideas more thoroughly, and reined me in when my writing overshot my argument. I offer my sincerest gratitude to the Smith Richardson Foundation and Yale University International Security Studies for the Predoctoral Fellowship that allowed me to do the bulk of the writing of this dissertation. Thanks also to the Brady-Johnson Program in Grand Strategy at Yale University, and John Gaddis and the incomparable Ann Carter-Drier at ISS.
    [Show full text]
  • Title: the Distribution of an Illustrated Timeline Wall Chart and Teacher's Guide of 20Fh Century Physics
    REPORT NSF GRANT #PHY-98143318 Title: The Distribution of an Illustrated Timeline Wall Chart and Teacher’s Guide of 20fhCentury Physics DOE Patent Clearance Granted December 26,2000 Principal Investigator, Brian Schwartz, The American Physical Society 1 Physics Ellipse College Park, MD 20740 301-209-3223 [email protected] BACKGROUND The American Physi a1 Society s part of its centennial celebration in March of 1999 decided to develop a timeline wall chart on the history of 20thcentury physics. This resulted in eleven consecutive posters, which when mounted side by side, create a %foot mural. The timeline exhibits and describes the millstones of physics in images and words. The timeline functions as a chronology, a work of art, a permanent open textbook, and a gigantic photo album covering a hundred years in the life of the community of physicists and the existence of the American Physical Society . Each of the eleven posters begins with a brief essay that places a major scientific achievement of the decade in its historical context. Large portraits of the essays’ subjects include youthful photographs of Marie Curie, Albert Einstein, and Richard Feynman among others, to help put a face on science. Below the essays, a total of over 130 individual discoveries and inventions, explained in dated text boxes with accompanying images, form the backbone of the timeline. For ease of comprehension, this wealth of material is organized into five color- coded story lines the stretch horizontally across the hundred years of the 20th century. The five story lines are: Cosmic Scale, relate the story of astrophysics and cosmology; Human Scale, refers to the physics of the more familiar distances from the global to the microscopic; Atomic Scale, focuses on the submicroscopic This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government.
    [Show full text]
  • New Mexico State. Poucedepartl11ent .. . an N Nair
    If you have issues viewing or accessing this file contact us at NCJRS.gov. ,,' ~ '..' (- .... New Mexico State. PoUceDepartl11ent .. - .. ' . An nnaiR eport19J 6 . " .'~ \" , ' ';- '. , '. r.;. ' NEW MEXICO STATE POLICE DISTRICTS Captain Frank Lucero Captain C. P.Anaya ' CommlUlder ~ District 01 Commander - District 07 P. O. Box, 1628 P. O. DrawerD Santa Fe, N. M. 87501 Esp:mola, N.M. 87532 827-2551 753-4277 Captain J. D. Mae.s Captain M. A. Matteson Command!:r • District 02 Commander - District' 08 P. O. Box 497 P .. O. Box 716 La$ Vegas, N. M. 87701 Alamogordo,N. M. 88310 425-6771 437-1313 Captain FIoyd Miles Captain A. C. Jones Commander -' District 03 Commander • District 09 P. O. Box 760 812 West 6th Street Roswell, N. M. 88201 Clovi~, N. M. $8101 622-7200 763-3426 Captain W. J. Kruse Captain R. J. McCool Commande~ ~ District 04 Commander - District 10 3000 E, University P.D. Box 1049 Las Cruces, N. M. 88001 Farmington, N. M. 87401 522-2222 n5-7547 Captain MelVin West CaptaIn S. Doitchinoff Commander - District 05 Commander • District 11 2501 . Carlisle .BlVd., N~ E. P. a.Box. 1455 Albuquerque, N. M. 87110 Socorro,. N. M. 87801 842-3082 835-0741 Captain M. L. Cordova Captain Otis A •.. Haley Commander - District 06 Commander- District 12 P. O. BoX 490 P. O. Box 566 Gnllup, N. M. 87301 Hobbs, N. M.88240 863-9353 392-5588 JAN 0 111978 GOVERNOR JERRY APODACA NEW MEXICO STATE POllCr; NEW MEXICO STATE POLICE DEPARTMENT ORGANllA1'lONAL CHART 1976 ANNUAL REPORT NEW Mr;XICO STATE'POLICE BOARD TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Quantum Mechanics Quantum Chromodynamics (QCD)
    Quantum Mechanics_quantum chromodynamics (QCD) In theoretical physics, quantum chromodynamics (QCD) is a theory ofstrong interactions, a fundamental forcedescribing the interactions between quarksand gluons which make up hadrons such as the proton, neutron and pion. QCD is a type of Quantum field theory called a non- abelian gauge theory with symmetry group SU(3). The QCD analog of electric charge is a property called 'color'. Gluons are the force carrier of the theory, like photons are for the electromagnetic force in quantum electrodynamics. The theory is an important part of the Standard Model of Particle physics. A huge body of experimental evidence for QCD has been gathered over the years. QCD enjoys two peculiar properties: Confinement, which means that the force between quarks does not diminish as they are separated. Because of this, when you do split the quark the energy is enough to create another quark thus creating another quark pair; they are forever bound into hadrons such as theproton and the neutron or the pion and kaon. Although analytically unproven, confinement is widely believed to be true because it explains the consistent failure of free quark searches, and it is easy to demonstrate in lattice QCD. Asymptotic freedom, which means that in very high-energy reactions, quarks and gluons interact very weakly creating a quark–gluon plasma. This prediction of QCD was first discovered in the early 1970s by David Politzer and by Frank Wilczek and David Gross. For this work they were awarded the 2004 Nobel Prize in Physics. There is no known phase-transition line separating these two properties; confinement is dominant in low-energy scales but, as energy increases, asymptotic freedom becomes dominant.
    [Show full text]
  • Executive Order 9066 and the Residents of Santa Cruz County
    Executive Order 9066 and the Residents of Santa Cruz County By Rechs Ann Pedersen Japanese American Citizens League Float, Watsonville Fourth of July Parade, 1941 Photo Courtesy of Bill Tao Copyright 2001 Santa Cruz Public Libraries. The content of this article is the responsibility of the individual author. It is the library’s intent to provide accurate information, however, it is not possible for the library to completely verify the accuracy of all information. If you believe that factual statements in a local history article are incorrect and can provide documentation, please contact the library. 1 Table of Contents Introduction Bibliography Chronology Part 1: The attack on Pearl Harbor up to the signing of Executive Order 9066 (December 7, 1941 to February 18, 1942) Part 2: The signing of Executive Order 9066 to the move to Poston (February 19, 1942 to June 17, 1942) Part 3: During the internment (July 17, 1942 to December 24, 1942) Part 4: During the internment (1943) Part 5: During the internment (1944) Part 6: The release and the return of the evacuees (January 1945 through 1946) Citizenship and Loyalty Alien Land Laws Executive Order 9066: Authorizing the Secretary of War to Prescribe Military Areas Fear of Attack, Fear of Sabotage, Arrests Restrictions on Axis Aliens Evacuation: The Restricted Area Public Proclamation No. 1 Public Proclamation No. 4 Salinas Assembly Center and Poston Relocation Center Agricultural Labor Shortage Military Service Lifting of Restrictions on Italians and Germans Release of the Evacuees Debate over the Return of Persons of Japanese Ancestry Return of the Evacuees 2 Introduction "...the successful prosecution of the war requires every possible protection against espionage and against sabotage." (Executive Order 9066) "This is no time for expansive discourses on protection of civil liberties for Japanese residents of the Pacific coast, whether they be American citizens or aliens." Editorial.
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Dictionary of Air Intelligence
    Historical Dictionaries of Intelligence and Counterintelligence Jon Woronoff, Series Editor 1. British Intelligence, by Nigel West, 2005. 2. United States Intelligence, by Michael A. Turner, 2006. 3. Israeli Intelligence, by Ephraim Kahana, 2006. 4. International Intelligence, by Nigel West, 2006. 5. Russian and Soviet Intelligence, by Robert W. Pringle, 2006. 6. Cold War Counterintelligence, by Nigel West, 2007. 7. World War II Intelligence, by Nigel West, 2008. 8. Sexspionage, by Nigel West, 2009. 9. Air Intelligence, by Glenmore S. Trenear-Harvey, 2009. Historical Dictionary of Air Intelligence Glenmore S. Trenear-Harvey Historical Dictionaries of Intelligence and Counterintelligence, No. 9 The Scarecrow Press, Inc. Lanham, Maryland • Toronto • Plymouth, UK 2009 SCARECROW PRESS, INC. Published in the United States of America by Scarecrow Press, Inc. A wholly owned subsidiary of The Rowman & Littlefield Publishing Group, Inc. 4501 Forbes Boulevard, Suite 200, Lanham, Maryland 20706 www.scarecrowpress.com Estover Road Plymouth PL6 7PY United Kingdom Copyright © 2009 by Glenmore S. Trenear-Harvey All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publisher. British Library Cataloguing in Publication Information Available Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Trenear-Harvey, Glenmore S., 1940– Historical dictionary of air intelligence / Glenmore S. Trenear-Harvey. p. cm. — (Historical dictionaries of intelligence and counterintelligence ; no. 9) Includes bibliographical references. ISBN-13: 978-0-8108-5982-1 (cloth : alk. paper) ISBN-10: 0-8108-5982-3 (cloth : alk. paper) ISBN-13: 978-0-8108-6294-4 (eBook) ISBN-10: 0-8108-6294-8 (eBook) 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Enclosed Is the Header; the Next Three Posts Contain the 517K Flat-Text of the "1984" Polemic
    Enclosed is the header; the next three posts contain the 517K flat-text of the "1984" polemic. For hardcore details on ECHELON, see Part 1 from 'Wild Conspiracy Theory' through the end of Part 1. ---guy ****************************************************************************** An Indictment of the U.S. Government and U.S. Politics Cryptography Manifesto ---------------------- By [email protected] 7/4/97-M version "The law does not allow me to testify on any aspect of the National Security Agency, even to the Senate Intelligence Committee" ---General Allen, Director of the NSA, 1975 "You bastards!" ---guy ****************************************************************************** This is about much more than just cryptography. It is also about everyone in the U.S.A. being fingerprinted for a defacto national ID card, about massive illegal domestic spying by the NSA, about the Military being in control of key politicians, about always being in a state of war, and about cybernetic control of society. ****************************************************************************** Part 1: Massive Domestic Spying via NSA ECHELON ---- - ------- -------- ------ --- --- ------- o The NSA Admits o Secret Court o Wild Conspiracy Theory o Over the Top o BAM-BAM-BAM o Australian ECHELON Spotted o New Zealand: Unhappy Campers Part 2: On Monitoring and Being Monitored ---- - -- ---------- --- ----- --------- o On Monitoring - Driver's Seat - Five Months Statistics - The FBI Investigations - I Can See What You Are Thinking - Why I Monitor o On Being
    [Show full text]
  • Replace with Your Title
    Advancing Vertical Flight: A Historical Perspective on AHS International and its Times M.E. Rhett Flater L. Kim Smith AHS Executive Director (1991-2011) AHS Deputy Director (1993-2011) M. E. Rhett Flater & Associates M.E. Rhett Flater & Associates Pine Knoll Shores, NC Pine Knoll Shores, NC ABSTRACT1 This paper describes AHS’s vital role in the development of the rotorcraft industry, with particular emphasis on events since 1990. It includes first-hand accounts of the formation of the Society, how it matured and evolved, and the particular influences that compelled change. It describes key events which occurred during various stages of the Society’s growth, including the formation of its technical committees, the evolution of the AHS Annual Forum and technical specialists’ meetings, and the creation and evolution of the Society’s publications. Featured prominently are accounts of AHS’s role in pursuing a combined government, industry and academia approach to rotorcraft science and technology. Also featured is the creation in 1965 of the Army-NASA Agreement for Joint Participation in Aeronautics Technology, the establishment of the U.S. Army Rotorcraft Centers of Excellence, the National Rotorcraft Technology Center (NRTC), the inauguration of the Congressional Rotorcraft Caucus and its support for the U.S. defense industrial base for rotorcraft, the battle for the survival of NASA aeronautics and critical NASA subsonic ground test facilities, and the launching of the International Helicopter Safety Team (IHST). First Annual AHS Banquet, October 7, 1944. 1Presented at the AHS 72nd Annual Forum, West Palm Beach, Florida, USA, May 17-19, 2016. Copyright © 2016 by the American Helicopter Society International, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • A Reference Guide to Selected Historical Documents Relating to the National Security Agency/Central Security Service (NSA/CSS) 1931-1985
    Description of document: A Reference Guide to Selected Historical Documents Relating to the National Security Agency/Central Security Service (NSA/CSS) 1931-1985 Requested date: 15-June-2009 Released date: 03-February-2010 Posted date: 15-February-2010 Source of document: National Security Agency Attn: FOIA/PA Office (DJP4) 9800 Savage Road, Suite 6248 Ft. George G. Meade, MD 20755-6248 Fax: 443-479-3612 Online form: Here The governmentattic.org web site (“the site”) is noncommercial and free to the public. The site and materials made available on the site, such as this file, are for reference only. The governmentattic.org web site and its principals have made every effort to make this information as complete and as accurate as possible, however, there may be mistakes and omissions, both typographical and in content. The governmentattic.org web site and its principals shall have neither liability nor responsibility to any person or entity with respect to any loss or damage caused, or alleged to have been caused, directly or indirectly, by the information provided on the governmentattic.org web site or in this file. The public records published on the site were obtained from government agencies using proper legal channels. Each document is identified as to the source. Any concerns about the contents of the site should be directed to the agency originating the document in question. GovernmentAttic.org is not responsible for the contents of documents published on the website. A REFERENCE GUIDE TO SELECTED HISTORICAL DOCUMENTS RELATING TO THE NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY/CENTRAL SECURITY SERVICE 1931-1985 (U) SOURCE DOCUMENTS IN Compiled by: CRYPTOLOGIC HISTORY Gerald K.
    [Show full text]