What Makes a Political Martyr? the Cultural and Political Deification of Jesus and Martin Luther King, Jr

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

What Makes a Political Martyr? the Cultural and Political Deification of Jesus and Martin Luther King, Jr What Makes a Political Martyr? The Cultural and Political Deification of Jesus and Martin Luther King, Jr. Undergraduate Research Thesis Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for graduation with “Honors Research Distinction” in the undergraduate colleges of The Ohio State University By Adam Levine The Ohio State University May 2017 Project Advisor: Professor Hassan Kwame-Jeffries, Department of History Acknowledgements I would like to thank my parents for their unconditional support of my pursuit of a liberal arts degree and for putting up with me complaining about my thesis. I would like to thank all of the teachers I have had from CJDS to Ohio State who only yelled at me after the fifth time to stop asking questions. Lastly, I would like to thank my advisor, Dr. Jeffries, for working with me on this project, answering my questions and giving me advice as a mentor and a teacher. 2 Table of Contents 0. Abstract ……………………………………………………………………………… 4 1. Topic Choice ………………………………………………………………...………...5 2. Structure ……………………………………………………………………………... 6 3. Jesus ………………………………………………………………………………….. 8 i. Fact or Fiction …………………………………………………………………. 8 ii. The Apostles ………………………………………………………………….. 9 iii. Jesus’ Relationship with his Contemporaries ………………………………. 12 iv. Ready to Die …………………………………………………………………15 v. Life After Death ……………………………………………………………... 17 vi. The Spread of Christianity ………………………………………………….. 19 vii. Jesus Conclusion …………………………………………………………… 22 4. Dr. Martin Luther King …………………………………………………………… 25 i. Beginnings, Montgomery Bus Boycott and Fame …………………………… 26 ii. Voting Rights, Letter from Birmingham Jail, The March on Washington and Response ………………………………………………………………………...29 iii. Chicago, The Tail End and Assassination …………………………………...34 iv. The Holiday ………………………………………………………………… 41 v. MLK Conclusion ……………………………………………………………. 44 5. Conclusion …………………………………………………………………………...45 6. Works Cited ................................................................................................................48 3 0. Abstract In the western world, Jesus stands alone as a deified persona. Today he is seen as a symbol for peace, love and moral righteousness, often used by people who don’t even share his philosophy. Misuse happens, people will use things correctly or incorrectly to justify their actions. This thesis studies how a person, particularly a martyr, gets to that point. Moreover, his ascension to a deity-like figure in western culture has weight. His words and actions (or actions in the stories) are powerful symbols just like his philosophy. Likewise, during the middle twentieth century in America, Dr. Martin Luther King began his rise Jesus like rise as counter to the contemporary political and social culture. Similarly disliked for challenging the status quo, Dr. King is not the only American political figure assassinated for disrupting the status quo. Yet aside from Jesus, he remains the only figure in America society with his own day as a federal holiday. Why? What similarities are there to Jesus that might explain this and does Jesus’s path to cultural and societal deification explain King’s rise? Additionally this thesis will cover how close King is to Jesus as a political tool. Political and cultural deification is clearly a question that has no objective conclusion but it’s something I wanted to research more, to see if there was some path and formula for these martyrs, possibly even considering whether martyrdom is required. I argue a variety of factors contribute to this, as explained by their lives, but the main factor is their dual use as a symbol: one for political power and one for uniting against the political power. Other martyrs do not reach this dual status in the way Jesus and King do and I use political history to defend my idea. 4 1. Topic choice I’ve mentioned in the abstract some of the questions I will explorebut I want to take a moment to explain why I am researching this topic. Growing up in the Midwest, seeing a billboard depicting an image or message of “Jesus died for your sins” is fairly common across interstate travel. Curious, I wanted to learn why Jesus earned this status usually reserved for Apple products and casinos. I understood the story, whether a fabrication or grounded in truth, and decided if people believed in the story then he deserved the praise he got. However, as I grew up and read more about biblical and historical figures I didn’t quite understand why he was put ahead of other historical characters: Moses, Isaac, etc… To even further complicate the problem I discovered many people misused and misrepresented Jesus’s philosophy and sayings. Moreover I questioned Jesus’ historical significance and relevance today. Does he deserve this fame, recognition and memorialization? Likewise in American socio-political history it seemed to me there were two men who stood above the rest in terms of long-term perseverance and relevancy as symbols. Abraham Lincoln and Dr. Martin Luther King. In the beginning I chose to study all three characters but as the year progressed I felt more strongly about producing a more concise thesis focusing on King and Jesus alone. Growing up I knew King faced push back during the Civil Rights movement but I assumed after time became universally accepted like Jesus, transcending even his opposition’s views. After taking an African American history course with Dr. Jeffries I 5 realized my naiveté. Although King’s transcendence rivals most American if not all American figures I wanted to find out if connections existed between King and Jesus. This thesis is not just for my own intellectual curiosity. I think it is important to study grandiose historical figures like King and Jesus. Learning about them helps put in perspective how we view, criticize and project the legacies of contemporary leaders. Likewise it allows us to criticize people who misuse them in the future. It also gives us a sense of what is important in a world dominated by 24/7 news coverage. We see the bigger picture. At least that is the goal of this paper. When people misuse people as symbols for some cause this type of study allows us to accurately see if that symbol represents the cause. Ultimately this thesis hopes to uncover trends, US cultural history, and anything else to help us determine legacy. 2. Structure The question I’m looking to answer is if there is anything in Jesus’ rise as a deity and the world’s use of him posthumously that helps predict King’s rise in American history. If it does, understanding whether this theory holds prescriptive or merely descriptive powers is important too. The thesis will be divided into three parts. First, an examination of the events, philosophy and sayings by Jesus’, resonating throughout his time and throughout the expansion of Christianity, then a subsequent section examines King’s life and his use posthumously and finally a conclusion section discussing the prescriptive and descriptive powers of the thesis. The outcome here is to identify both the accuracy of using Jesus as justification as well as what Jesus as a symbol has come to mean in the two thousand years since his story started. 6 Moreover, it is important to know characters like King and Jesus were not like artists discovered years after their death. They both had followings during their time in addition to their opposition. Therefore it will be important to know why Paul and the apostles followed Jesus in addition to knowing why Churches and countries embraced him. Likewise it will be important to know why King had the following and opposition he had during the civil rights era. In comparing how they were viewed contemporarily in light of their legacy will provide the crux of what we’re looking for. It must matter somewhat what people do or else the storytellers (apostles, etc…) could make up similar stories for fictional characters and they might become American political martyrs just like King. I initially hypothesize it matters up to a certain point of fame, legacy and infamy. After some time the original story gets misconstrued; people misquote King or misinterpret Jesus. The next section will cover Dr. King in a similar manner to how I covered Jesus; Researching what events gained him an initial following and notoriety. After that the thesis will look into certain events like the creation of the MLK holiday as to how the public perceived his legacy. Obviously King has not reached complete deified status in America or the world, but as far as his place in American political history it seems to me that King, Lincoln and Washington stand above the rest. Part of the end goal of this thesis is to determine if that his legacy is actually cemented as one of the American political and cultural fathers. As part of a comprehensive look at King in America it will be important to compare him with other highly thought of American figures like JFK, Lincoln and others as to why he ranks higher than them in legacy. 7 Lastly I’ll conclude the research with an answer about King’s place in American political deification. Ideally I’ll develop a formula or rough sketch of the criteria necessary for pseudo-deification and offer some brief insights on characters like Obama. 3. Jesus Jesus’s legacy arguably singlehandedly affected western culture more than any one person. Whether it was interpreting his meaning through Catholicism or Protestantism and dividing up Western Europe or influencing the enlightenment philosophy that gave birth to America and the New World, Jesus’ name found its way into almost every contentious idea and debate (e.g. slavery). i. Fact or Fiction? Jesus miraculous acts live in infamy: turning water to wine, walking on water, multiplying bread, etc… Does it matter though? Does it matter if Jesus actually did those things or if they are partial-truths, full fibs or exaggerations? Conventional thought convinces me that praising another person for miraculous acts requires those acts to occur.
Recommended publications
  • Letter to a Loved
    Dear Loved One, To begin, I love you and I appreciate everything you’ve done for me throughout my life. You have been an incredibly supportive force and it has meant a lot to have you cheering me on as I have traversed life’s ups and downs. And I agree, we have been watching and listening to the folks who have lost everything. For eight minutes and forty-six seconds I watched as a police officer, sworn to protect his community, slowly asphyxiated a Black man repeatedly pleading for his life. I watched as two men accosted and murdered a Black man in Georgia, because he had the audacity to allegedly look at a construction site. I listened as a Black man pleaded for the police to protect him after plain clothes police officers executed a no-knock raid on his home and fatally shot his girlfriend as she lay in bed – a no-knock raid looking for an individual the police already had in custody. In fact, for my entire life I’ve watched and listened as my community has fallen victim again and again to a militarized police department too quick to pull the trigger and too slow to police itself. The recurring atrocity of a police officer killing an unarmed Black American has persisted from the very founding of our Nation to the moment your eyes touch this sentence. At our Nation’s founding, night watches and paddyrollers, the early manifestations of our modern police force, roamed plantations searching for and killing slaves who had the courage to run from the indignities of slavery.
    [Show full text]
  • Theories of Sacrifice and Ritual
    UC Davis UC Davis Previously Published Works Title Inventing the Scapegoat: Theories of Sacrifice and Ritual Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/055689pg Journal Journal of Ritual Studies, 25(1) Author Janowitz, Naomi Publication Date 2011 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Inventing the Scapegoat: Theories of Sacrifice and Ritual No figure appears in studies of sacrifice more often than the scapegoat. Numerous societies, the argument goes, have a seemingly innate need to purge sins via an innocent victim. The killing of this victim constitutes the core of sacrifice traditions; explaining the efficacy of these rites outlines in turn the inner workings of all sacrifices, if not all rituals. I do not believe, however, that the enigmatic figure of the scapegoat can support a universal theory of sacrifice, especially if the general term “scapegoat” turns out refer to a variety of rituals with very different goals. Rene Girard’s extremely influential theory of the scapegoat includes a biological basis for the importance of the figure (Girard, 1977). According to Girard, humans are naturally aggressive, a la Konrad Lorenz. This innate aggression was channeled into an unending series of attacks and counterattacks during the earliest periods of history. A better outlet for aggression was to find a scapegoat whose death would stop the cycle of retribution (p. 2). For Girard, Oedipus was a human scapegoat, placing this model 2 at the center of Greek culture in addition to Biblical religious traditions (p. 72). Jonathan Smith’s observations on Girard’s model in “The Domestication of Sacrifice” are both simple and devastating (1987).
    [Show full text]
  • What Made Nonviolent Protest Effective During the Civil Rights Movement?
    NEW YORK STATE SOCIAL STUDIES RESOURCE TOOLKIT 5011th Grade Civil Rights Inquiry What Made Nonviolent Protest Effective during the Civil Rights Movement? © Bettmann / © Corbis/AP Images. Supporting Questions 1. What was tHe impact of the Greensboro sit-in protest? 2. What made tHe Montgomery Bus Boycott, BirmingHam campaign, and Selma to Montgomery marcHes effective? 3. How did others use nonviolence effectively during the civil rights movement? THIS WORK IS LICENSED UNDER A CREATIVE COMMONS ATTRIBUTION- NONCOMMERCIAL- SHAREALIKE 4.0 INTERNATIONAL LICENSE. 1 NEW YORK STATE SOCIAL STUDIES RESOURCE TOOLKIT 11th Grade Civil Rights Inquiry What Made Nonviolent Protest Effective during the Civil Rights Movement? 11.10 SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC CHANGE/DOMESTIC ISSUES (1945 – PRESENT): Racial, gender, and New York State socioeconomic inequalities were addressed By individuals, groups, and organizations. Varying political Social Studies philosophies prompted debates over the role of federal government in regulating the economy and providing Framework Key a social safety net. Idea & Practices Gathering, Using, and Interpreting Evidence Chronological Reasoning and Causation Staging the Discuss tHe recent die-in protests and tHe extent to wHicH tHey are an effective form of nonviolent direct- Question action protest. Supporting Question 1 Supporting Question 2 Supporting Question 3 Guided Student Research Independent Student Research What was tHe impact of tHe What made tHe Montgomery Bus How did otHers use nonviolence GreensBoro sit-in protest? boycott, the Birmingham campaign, effectively during tHe civil rights and tHe Selma to Montgomery movement? marcHes effective? Formative Formative Formative Performance Task Performance Task Performance Task Create a cause-and-effect diagram tHat Detail tHe impacts of a range of actors Research the impact of a range of demonstrates the impact of the sit-in and tHe actions tHey took to make tHe actors and tHe effective nonviolent protest by the Greensboro Four.
    [Show full text]
  • Lorne Bair :: Catalog 21
    LORNE BAIR :: CATALOG 21 1 Lorne Bair Rare Books, ABAA PART 1: AFRICAN-AMERICAN HISTORY & LITERATURE 2621 Daniel Terrace Winchester, Virginia USA 22601 (540) 665-0855 Email: [email protected] Website: www.lornebair.com TERMS All items are offered subject to prior sale. Unless prior arrangements have been made, payment is expected with order and may be made by check, money order, credit card (Visa, MasterCard, Discover, American Express), or direct transfer of funds (wire transfer or Paypal). Institutions may be billed. Returns will be accepted for any reason within ten days of receipt. ALL ITEMS are guaranteed to be as described. Any restorations, sophistications, or alterations have been noted. Autograph and manuscript material is guaranteed without conditions or restrictions, and may be returned at any time if shown not to be authentic. DOMESTIC SHIPPING is by USPS Priority Mail at the rate of $9.50 for the first item and $3 for each additional item. Overseas shipping will vary depending upon destination and weight; quotations can be supplied. Alternative carriers may be arranged. WE ARE MEMBERS of the ABAA (Antiquarian Bookseller’s Association of America) and ILAB (International League of Antiquarian Book- sellers) and adhere to those organizations’ standards of professionalism and ethics. PART ONE African American History & Literature ITEMS 1-54 PART TWO Radical, Social, & Proletarian Literature ITEMS 55-92 PART THREE Graphics, Posters & Original Art ITEMS 93-150 PART FOUR Social Movements & Radical History ITEMS 151-194 2 PART 1: AFRICAN-AMERICAN HISTORY & LITERATURE 1. CUNARD, Nancy (ed.) Negro Anthology Made by Nancy Cunard 1931-1933. London: Nancy Cunard at Wishart & Co., 1934.
    [Show full text]
  • Gajah 35 (2011)
    NUMBER 35 2011 GAJAHJournal of the Asian Elephant Specialist Group GAJAH Journal of the Asian Elephant Specialist Group Number 35 (2011) The journal is intended as a medium of communication on issues that concern the management and conservation of Asian elephants (Elephas maximus) both in the wild and in captivity. It is a means by which members of the AsESG and others can communicate their experiences, ideas and perceptions freely, so that the conservation of Asian elephants can benefit. All articles published in Gajah reflect the individual views of the authors and not necessarily that of the editorial board or the AsESG. The copyright of each article remains with the author(s). Editor Jayantha Jayewardene Biodiversity and Elephant Conservation Trust 615/32 Rajagiriya Gardens Nawala Road, Rajagiriya Sri Lanka [email protected] Editorial Board Dr. Richard Barnes Dr. Prithiviraj Fernando Ecology, Behavior & Evolution Section Centre for Conservation and Research Division of Biological Sciences MC-0116 35 Gunasekara Gardens University of California at San Diego Nawala Road La Jolla, CA 92093-0116 Rajagiriya USA Sri Lanka e-mail: [email protected] e-mail: [email protected] Dr. Jennifer Pastorini Heidi Riddle Centre for Conservation and Research Riddles Elephant & Wildlife Sanctuary 35 Gunasekara Gardens P.O.Box 715 Nawala Road, Rajagiriya Greenbrier, Arkansas 72058 Sri Lanka USA e-mail: [email protected] e-mail: [email protected] Dr. Alex Rübel Arnold Sitompul Direktor Zoo Zürich Conservation Science Initiative Zürichbergstrasse 221 Jl. Setia Budi Pasar 2 CH - 8044 Zürich Komp. Insan Cita Griya Blok CC No 5 Switzerland Medan, 20131 e-mail: [email protected] Indonesia e-mail:[email protected] GAJAH Journal of the Asian Elephant Specialist Group Number 35 (2011) This publication of Gajah was financed by the International Elephant Foundation Editorial Note Articles published in Gajah may be used, distributed and reproduced in any medium, provided the article is properly cited.
    [Show full text]
  • “Who Speaks for Chicago?” Civil Rights, Community Organization and Coalition, 1910-1971 by Michelle Kimberly Johnson Thesi
    “Who Speaks for Chicago?” Civil Rights, Community Organization and Coalition, 1910-1971 By Michelle Kimberly Johnson Fig. 1. Bernard J. Kleina, 1966 Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Bachelor of Arts In the Department of History at Brown University Thesis Advisor: Françoise Hamlin Friday, April 8, 2016 I am writing this thesis as a Black, biracial, woman of color. My Black paternal grandparents spent most of their lives on the South Side of Chicago, my father grew up there, and I grew up in Waukegan, Illinois, a mixed-income suburb fifty miles north of the city. This project is both extremely personal and political in nature. As someone working toward a future in academic activism and who utilizes a historical lens to do that work, the question of how to apply the stories and lessons of the past to the present, both as an intellectual project and a practical means of change, is always at the forefront. 2 Table of Contents Acknowledgments ...........................................................................................................................4 Introduction .....................................................................................................................................7 Chapter 1 Establishing Identity: The Great Migration and Early Civil Rights Organizing, 1900-1960 .......24 Chapter 2 Coordinated Efforts: The Battle for Better Schools, 1960-1965 ..................................................52 Chapter 3 End the Slums: Martin Luther King, Jr., 1966, and
    [Show full text]
  • The Right to Assisted Suicide and Euthanasia
    THE RIGHT TO ASSISTED SUICIDE AND EUTHANASIA NEIL M. GORSUCH* I. INTRODUCTION ........................................................ 600 I. THE COURTS ............................................................. 606 A. The Washington Due Process Litigation............ 606 1. The Trial Court ...................... 606 2. The Ninth Circuit Panel Decision ............. 608 3. The En Banc Court ...................................... 609 B. The New York Equal ProtectionLitigation ........ 611 1. The Trial Court ........................................... 611 2. The Second Circuit ..................................... 612 C. The Supreme Court............................................. 613 1. The Majority Opinion ................................. 614 2. The Concurrences ....................................... 616 D. The Consequences ofGlucksberg and Quill .... 619 III. ARGUMENTS FROM HISTORY ................................... 620 A. Which History?................................................... 620 B. The Ancients ....................................................... 623 C. Early Christian Thinkers .................................... 627 D. English Common Law ......................................... 630 E. ColonialAmerican Experience........................... 631 F. The Modern Consensus: Suicide ........................ 633 G. The Modern Consensus: Assisting Suicide and Euthanasia.......................................................... 636 IV. ARGUMENTS FROM FAIRNESS .................................. 641 A . Causation...........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Promised Land (1967–1968)
    EPISODE 10: THE PROMISED LAND (1967–1968) Episode 10 reviews the final months of Reverend Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.’s life and the immediate aftermath of his assassination. This period marked an intensification of the nonviolent struggle in two areas: the struggle against poverty and the efforts to end the Vietnam War. For King, these two issues 1965 became inseparable. Jan. 8 In his State of the Union address, newly elect- By 1967, the United States was deeply ed President Lyndon B. Johnson declares a entrenched in the Vietnam War. Invoking the fear of “War on Poverty” campaign communist expansion and the threat it posed to Aug. 4 The US Congress passes the “Gulf of Tonkin democracy, President Lyndon B. Johnson increased Resolution.” The resolution opened the way to the number of US troops in Vietnam. In response, large-scale involvement of US forces in some civil rights leaders charged that President Vietnam Johnson’s domestic “war on poverty” was falling vic- 1966 tim to US war efforts abroad. Aug. President Johnson authorizes the deployment Episode 10 opens with King’s internal dilemma of more troops to Vietnam, bringing the total about finding a proper way to publicly denounce to 429,000 America’s involvement in Vietnam. In a speech 1967 delivered on April 4, 1967, at Riverside Church in New York, King told the gathered clergy that it was Apr. 4 At Riverside Church in New York City, King “time to break the silence” on Vietnam. Drawing publicly denounces the war in Vietnam connections between the resources spent on the war Jul.
    [Show full text]
  • Fragments on the Resurrection
    FRAGMENTS OF THE LOST WORK OF JUSTIN ON THE RESURRECTION Public domain. Formatting by www.basilica.org. Copyright free. FRAGMENTS OF THE LOST WORK OF JUSTIN ON THE RESURRECTION • CHAP. I.—THE SELF-EVIDENCING POWER OF TRUTH. • CHAP. II.—OBJECTIONS TO THE RESURRECTION OF THE FLESH. • CHAP. III.—IF THE MEMBERS RISE, MUST THEY DISCHARGE THE SAME FUNCTIONS AS NOW? • CHAP. IV.—MUST THE DEFORMED RISE DEFORMED? • CHAP. V.—THE RESURRECTION OF THE FLESH IS NOT IMPOSSIBLE. • CHAP. VI.—THE RESURRECTION CONSISTENT WITH THE OPINIONS OF THE PHILOSOPHERS. • CHAP. VII.—THE BODY VALUABLE IN GOD'S SIGHT. • CHAP. VIII.—DOES THE BODY CAUSE THE SOUL TO SIN? • CHAP. IX.—THE RESURRECTION OF CHRIST PROVES THAT THE BODY RISES. • CHAP. X.—THE BODY SAVED, AND WILL THEREFORE RISE. FRAGMENTS OF THE LOST WORK OF JUSTIN ON THE RESURRECTION [TRANSLATED BY THE REV. M. DODS, M.A.] CHAP. I.—THE SELF-EVIDENCING POWER OF TRUTH. THE word of truth is free, and carries its own authority, disdaining to fall under any skilful argument, or to endure the logical scrutiny of its hearers. But it would be believed for its own nobility, and for the confidence due to Him who sends it. Now the word of truth is sent from God; wherefore the freedom claimed by the truth is not arrogant. For being sent with authority, it were not fit that it should be required to produce proof of what is said; since neither is there any proof beyond itself, which is God. For every proof is more powerful and trustworthy than that which it proves; since what is disbelieved, until proof is produced, gets credit when such proof is produced, and is recognised as being what it was stated to be.
    [Show full text]
  • Martin Luther King Jr
    Martin Luther King Jr. Martin Luther King Jr. (born Michael King Jr.; January 15, 1929 – April 4, 1968) was an American Baptist minister and activist who The Reverend became the most visible spokesperson and leader in the American civil rights movement from 1955 until his assassination in 1968. King Martin Luther King Jr. advanced civil rights through nonviolence and civil disobedience, inspired by his Christian beliefs and the nonviolent activism of Mahatma Gandhi. He was the son of early civil rights activist Martin Luther King Sr. King participated in and led marches for blacks' right to vote, desegregation, labor rights, and other basic civil rights.[1] King led the 1955 Montgomery bus boycott and later became the first president of the Southern Christian Leadership Conference (SCLC). As president of the SCLC, he led the unsuccessful Albany Movement in Albany, Georgia, and helped organize some of the nonviolent 1963 protests in Birmingham, Alabama. King helped organize the 1963 March on Washington, where he delivered his famous "I Have a Dream" speech on the steps of the Lincoln Memorial. The SCLC put into practice the tactics of nonviolent protest with some success by strategically choosing the methods and places in which protests were carried out. There were several dramatic stand-offs with segregationist authorities, who sometimes turned violent.[2] FBI King in 1964 Director J. Edgar Hoover considered King a radical and made him an 1st President of the Southern Christian object of the FBI's COINTELPRO from 1963, forward. FBI agents investigated him for possible communist ties, recorded his extramarital Leadership Conference affairs and reported on them to government officials, and, in 1964, In office mailed King a threatening anonymous letter, which he interpreted as an attempt to make him commit suicide.[3] January 10, 1957 – April 4, 1968 On October 14, 1964, King won the Nobel Peace Prize for combating Preceded by Position established racial inequality through nonviolent resistance.
    [Show full text]
  • The State of America's Children®
    THE STATE OF AMERICA’S CHILDREN® 2014 CDF Mission Statement The Children’s Defense Fund Leave No Child Behind® mission is to ensure every child a Healthy Start, a Head Start, a Fair Start, a Safe Start and a Moral Start in life and successful passage to adulthood with the help of caring families and communities. CDF provides a strong, effective and independent voice for all the children of America who cannot vote, lobby or speak for themselves. We pay particular attention to the needs of poor and minority children and those with disabilities. CDF educates the nation about the needs of children and encourages preventive investments before they get sick, drop out of school, get into trouble or suffer family breakdown. CDF began in 1973 and is a private, nonprofit organization supported by foundation and corporate grants and individual donations. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. visiting poor families in Greenwood, Mississippi in July 1964. (AP Photo/Jim Bourdier) © 2014 Children’s Defense Fund. All rights reserved. Front and back cover photos © Steve Liss • Inside photos © Dean Alexander Photography, Jane Rule Burdine and Steve Liss ii • Children’s Defense Fund Table of Contents Foreword. 2 Overview of The State of America’s Children 2014 . 4 Child Well-Being 50 Years After the Launch of War on Poverty. 10 Each Day in America . 12 Moments in America . 16 How America Ranks Among Industrialized Countries . 18 Child Population . 20 Child Poverty . 22 Family Structure and Income . 24 Housing and Homelessness. 26 Child Hunger and Nutrition . 28 Child Health . 30 Early Childhood . 32 Education .
    [Show full text]
  • San Diego History Center Is One of the Largest and Oldest Historical Organizations on the West Coast
    The Journal of San Diego Volume 61 Spring 2015 Number 2 • The Journal of San Diego History Diego San of Journal 2 • The Number 2015 Spring 61 Volume History Publication of The Journal of San Diego History is underwritten by major grants from the Robert D. L. Gardiner Foundation and the Quest for Truth Foundation, established by the late James G. Scripps. Additional support is provided by “The Journal of San Diego History Fund” of the San Diego Foundation and private donors. Founded in 1928 as the San Diego Historical Society, today’s San Diego History Center is one of the largest and oldest historical organizations on the West Coast. It houses vast regionally significant collections of objects, photographs, documents, films, oral histories, historic clothing, paintings, and other works of art. The San Diego History Center operates two major facilities in national historic landmark districts: The Research Library and History Museum in Balboa Park and the Serra Museum in Presidio Park. The San Diego History Center presents dynamic changing exhibitions that tell the diverse stories of San Diego’s past, present, and future, and it provides educational programs for K-12 schoolchildren as well as adults and families. www.sandiegohistory.org Front Cover: Colorized postcards from the 1915 Panama-California Exhibition. (Clockwise) California Tower, Botanical Building, Cabrillo Bridge, and Commerce and Industries Building. Back Cover: USO Headquarters at Horton Plaza, World War II, supported by the Wax Family of San Diego. Design and Layout: Allen Wynar Printing: Crest Offset Printing Editorial Assistants: Travis Degheri Cynthia van Stralen Joey Seymour Articles appearing in The Journal of San Diego History are abstracted and indexed in Historical Abstracts and America: History and Life.
    [Show full text]