Arxiv:1805.00522V8 [Math.NT] 22 May 2021 a EDAIYI OIIEDIMENSION POSITIVE in DUALITY TATE VRFNTO FIELDS FUNCTION OVER E Rosengarten Zev Abstract
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
TATE DUALITY IN POSITIVE DIMENSION OVER FUNCTION FIELDS Zev Rosengarten arXiv:1805.00522v8 [math.NT] 22 May 2021 Abstract We extend the classical duality results of Poitou and Tate for finite discrete Galois modules over local and global fields (local duality, nine-term exact sequence, etc.) to all affine com- mutative group schemes of finite type, building on the recent work of Česnavičius [Čes2] extending these results to all finite commutative group schemes. We concentrate mainly on the more difficult function field setting, giving some remarks about the number field case along the way. Contents 1 Introduction and Main Results 4 1.1 Introduction.................................... 4 1.2 Mainresults.................................... 4 1.3 Overviewofmethods............................... 12 1.4 Acknowledgements ................................ 13 1.5 Notation and terminology . 14 2 General fields 15 2.1 Structure of affine commutative group schemes of finite type......... 16 1 2.2 Vanishing of E xt (·, Gm) ............................. 20 1 2.3 Applications of the vanishing of E xt (·, Gm) .................. 32 2.4 Doubleduality .................................. 35 2.5 Cohomology of Ga ................................ 39 2.6 Brauer groups and differential forms . 46 2 2 2.7 Computation of cH (R, Ga) and H (Ga, R, Gm)prim .............. 53 3 2.8 Vanishing of H (R, Ga) ............................. 59 2.9 Comparison between Čechc and sheaf cohomology . ...... 70 c 3 Local Fields 75 3.1 Cohomological vanishing over local and global fields . .......... 75 2 0 3.2 Duality between H (k, G) and H (k, G)pro ................... 78 3.3 Topology on local cohomology . 81 3.4 Duality between H1(k, G) and H1(k, Gb) for almost-tori . 85 2 3.5 Duality between H (k, G) and G(k)pro ..................... 88 3.6 Duality between H1(k, G) and H1(k, Gb) ..................... 95 b 4 Local Integral Cohomology b 99 3 4.1 Vanishing of H (Ov, G ) .............................. 99 2 0 4.2 Integral annihilator aspects of duality between H (kv, G) and H (kv, G) . 101 1 1 1 1 4.3 Injectivity of H (Ov, Gb) → H (kv, G) and H (Ov, G ) → H (kv, G) . 102 b b b 1 1 1 4.4 Integral annihilator aspects of duality between H (kv, G) and H (kv, G) . 108 2 0 4.5 Integral annihilator aspects of duality between H (kv, G) and H (kv, G) . 112 b 5 Global Fields b 116 5.1 Preliminaries ................................... 117 5.2 Relation between adelic and local cohomology . ........ 119 5.3 Topology on cohomology of the adeles and adelic duality . .......... 127 5.4 Vanishing of H3(A, G) .............................. 134 5.5 Exactness properties for profinite completions of rational points . 138 0 5.6 Exactness at H (k, Gb)pro ............................. 140 0 5.7 Exactness at H (A, G)pro ............................ 143 5.8 Exactness at H0(A, G) .............................. 148 5.9 Exactness at H2(k, G)∗ .............................. 152 5.10 The fundamental exact sequence . 153 5.11 Defining the X-pairingsb ............................. 155 5.12 Injectivity of X1(G) → X2(G)∗ ........................ 157 5.13 Injectivity of X2(G) → X1(G)∗ ........................ 161 5.14 Exactness at H1(A, G) and Hb1(A, G) ...................... 172 5.15 Injectivity of X2(G) → X1(Gb)∗ ........................ 177 5.16 Injectivity of X1(G) → X2(G)∗ andb finiteness of X ............. 183 5.17 The dual 9-termexactsequence.b . 187 b A Products and Ultraproducts 190 A.1 Ultraproducts as local rings . 190 A.2 Properties inherited by local rings of products . .......... 192 B Valuation Rings 195 B.1 Iterates of matrices over rank-1 valuation rings . 195 B.2 Smooth schemes over valuation rings . 205 C Profinite Completions 211 C.1 Right-exactness of profinite completion . ........ 211 C.2 Conditions under which profinite completion preserves exactness . 213 C.3 Products...................................... 216 D Duality Pairings and Weil Restriction 219 E Cohomology and Direct Limits 224 F Compatibility Between Čech and Derived Functor Constructions 226 F.1 Edgemaps .................................... 226 F.2 Connectingmaps ................................. 230 2 G Characteristic 0 236 3 Chapter 1 Introduction and Main Results 1.1 Introduction Tate’s theorems on the Galois cohomology of finite discrete Galois modules over local and global fields are the cornerstone for the arithmetic theory of abelian varieties, Galois defor- mation theory, and beyond. In the function field case, these results traditionally required the hypothesis that the order of the Galois module is not divisible by the characteristic. The restriction on the order was recently removed in work of Česnavičius ([Čes1], [Čes2]), also permitting general (i.e., not necessarily étale) finite commutative group schemes over local and global function fields. This requires using fppf cohomology rather than étale cohomology (the two coincide for coefficients in an étale finite commutative group scheme, or equivalently a finite discrete Galois module; more generally, they agree for coefficients in a smooth commutative group scheme, by [BrIII, Thm. 11.7]). It also requires using cohomology over the spectrum of an adele ring in the global case in place of various restricted direct products and direct sums as in the traditional formulation. Our aim in the present work is to build on those results in the finite case to establish analogous duality theorems for the fppf cohomology of commutative affine group schemes G of finite type with nonnegative dimension over local and global fields k. This is much easier in characteristic 0 (as we discuss briefly in Appendix G), so our main focus in this work is on the function field case, where the imperfection of such fields leads to substantial difficulties. Even the case G = Ga presents serious challenges for duality theorems when char(k) > 0, in large part because the Gm-dual functor G := H om(G, Gm) over the category of k-schemes is non-representable (see Proposition 2.3.5). b 1.2 Main results Let us now record our main results over local and global fields, giving references for the finite case already treated by Poitou, Tate, and Česnavičius. Before stating these results, 4 however, let us remark that while we mainly restrict our attention to the more difficult function field setting in this work, all of our main results remain true over number fields (and non-archimedean fields of characteristic 0 for the local results) unless we explicitly state otherwise, and are usually much easier in that setting. To state the local results, we need some notation. Given any locally compact Hausdorff D topological abelian group A, we let A := Homcts(A, R/Z) denote the Pontryagin dual, and we denote by Apro the profinite completion of A. (For the definition of the profinite completion, see the beginning of §C.1.) Consider the class C of locally compact Hausdorff abelian groups A that are either (i) profinite, (ii) discrete torsion, or (iii) of finite exponent. Many of the groups that we will be concerned with in the local setting lie in this class (but there are important exceptions, such as k× for a non-archimedean local field k). The class C has several nice properties. For example, such A satisfy D A = Homcts(A, (Q/Z)disc) where (Q/Z)disc denotes Q/Z with its discrete topology. Another nice property of C is that it is stable under A AD: if A is profinite then AD is discrete torsion, and vice-versa, and the dual of a group of finite exponent is still of finite exponent. Remark 1.2.1. Given two locally compact Hausdorff abelian groups A, B and a continuous bilinear pairing A × B → R/Z, the induced map A → BD is a topological isomorphism if and only if the map B → AD is, by Pontryagin double duality [Ru, Thm. 1.7.2]. If both of these equivalent conditions hold, then we say that the pairing is perfect. Let k be a local field. Given an fppf abelian sheaf F on Spec(k), we define F := 2 H om(F , Gm) and we give H (k, F ) the discrete topology. Given a commutative affine k-group scheme G of finite type, we also give G(k) the discrete topology. On thec other hand, we give G(k) its natural topology arising from that on k. That is, we choose a closed n n n immersion G ֒→ Ak into an affine space over k,b give Ak (k) = k its usual topology, and then endow G(k) with the subspace topology. This is independent of the choice of the embedding and makes G(k) into a locally compact Hausdorff group, functorially in G. If G is finite, this is simply the discrete topology on G(k). Our first main local result is the following. Theorem 1.2.2. (Theorem 3.2.3) Let k be a local field of positive characteristic, and let G be an affine commutative k-group scheme of finite type. The cohomology group H2(k, G) is 2 2 inv torsion, G(k) is finitely generated, and the cup product H (k, G) × G(k) → H (k, Gm) −−→ ∼ Q/Z induces a functorial continuous perfect pairing of locally compact Hausdorff abelian groups b b 2 H (k, G) × G(k)pro → Q/Z, where H2(k, G) is discrete. b 5 If G is finite then G(k)= G(k)pro, so this case is [Mi2, Ch. III, Thm. 6.10]. By “functo- riality” in Theorem 1.2.2, we mean that if we have a homomorphism f : G → H of k-group schemes as in Theoremb 1.2.2, thenb the diagram 2 H (k, G) × G(k)pro Q/Z H2(f) f(k) bb 2 H (k,H) × H(k)pro Q/Z commutes. This functoriality follows from theb functoriality of cup product.