Aerial Cable Transit Feasibility Study Final Report, 2/2016

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Aerial Cable Transit Feasibility Study Final Report, 2/2016 Aerial Cable Transit Feasibility Study WORK ORDER # GPC V-31 PREPARED BY FEBRUARY 2016 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK AERIAL CABLE TRANSIT FEASIBILITY STUDY Final Report Work Order #GPC V-31 February 2016 Prepared by: The preparation of this report has been financed in part from the U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT) through the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and/or the Federal Transit Administration (FTA), the State Planning and Research Program (Section 505 of Title 23, U.S. Code) and Miami-Dade County, Florida. The contents of this report do not necessarily reflect the official views or policy of the U.S. Department of Transportation. Final Report THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK GPC V-31: Aerial Cable Transit Feasibility Study Final Report TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction .......................................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Agency Coordination ................................................................................................................................................. 4 2. ACT Technology .................................................................................................................................................................. 5 2.1 System Characteristics .............................................................................................................................................. 5 2.1.1 Climate Control ......................................................................................................................................... 6 2.1.2 Sustainability ............................................................................................................................................ 6 2.1.3 Reliability/Safety ....................................................................................................................................... 7 2.1.4 Evacuation .............................................................................................................................................. 10 2.1.5 Accessibility / ADA ................................................................................................................................. 11 2.2 ACT System Types .................................................................................................................................................. 12 2.2.1 Mono-Cable Gondola (1S) ...................................................................................................................... 12 2.2.2 Bi-Cable Gondola (2S) ........................................................................................................................... 12 2.2.3 Tri-Cable Gondola (3S) .......................................................................................................................... 13 2.2.4 Jig-Back and Dual-Line Aerial Gondola .................................................................................................. 13 2.2.5 Pulse Gondola ........................................................................................................................................ 14 2.3 Selected ACT Technology Type .............................................................................................................................. 15 2.4 Representative Urban ACT Systems ....................................................................................................................... 17 2.4.1 Roosevelt Island Gondola – New York City, NY ..................................................................................... 17 2.4.2 Oregon Health Sciences Tramway – Portland, Oregon .......................................................................... 19 2.4.3 Mountain Village Gondola – Telluride, Colorado .................................................................................... 20 2.4.4 Metro Cable Gondola – Medellin, Colombia ........................................................................................... 22 2.4.5 Mi Teleferico Gondola – La Paz, Bolivia ................................................................................................. 23 2.4.6 Constantine / Tlemcen / Skikda ACT Systems – Algiers, Algeria ........................................................... 25 2.4.7 Emirates Airway Gondola – London, United Kingdom ............................................................................ 26 2.4.8 The Wire Gondola – Austin, Texas (Proposed) ...................................................................................... 28 2.4.9 Georgetown Gondola – Washington, D.C. (Proposed) ........................................................................... 29 2.4.10 Mexi-Cable ACT System – Mexico City, Mexico (Under Construction) ................................................ 30 2.5 ACT Technology Conclusions ................................................................................................................................. 33 3. Transit Needs Identification ............................................................................................................................................... 35 3.1 Activity Centers within the Study Area ..................................................................................................................... 35 3.2 Previous and Ongoing Relevant Studies ................................................................................................................. 37 3.2.1 State Road 836 Express Bus Service (2015) ......................................................................................... 37 3.2.2 Enhanced Bus Service Along Flagler / SW 8th Street (2014).................................................................. 37 GPC V-31: Aerial Cable Transit Feasibility Study i Final Report 3.2.3 Beach Corridor Transit Connection Study (2014) ................................................................................... 38 3.2.4 Metromover System Expansion Study (2014) ........................................................................................ 38 3.2.5 Enhance Bus Service Along Biscayne Boulevard – Rapid Biscayne (2013) .......................................... 39 3.2.6 Biscayne Green (2015)........................................................................................................................... 39 3.2.7 Metrorail – Coconut Grove Connection Study (2007) ............................................................................. 39 3.2.8 Interim BRT Service to Downtown via the MacArthur Causeway (Ongoing) .......................................... 40 3.2.9 CSX East-West Rail Feasibility Study (Ongoing) ................................................................................... 41 3.3 Existing and Proposed Transit Services .................................................................................................................. 41 3.3.1 Existing Transit ....................................................................................................................................... 41 3.3.1.1 South Florida Regional Transportation Authority – Tri-Rail ............................................ 41 3.3.1.2 Miami-Dade Transit - Metrobus ...................................................................................... 42 3.3.1.3 Miami-Dade Transit - Metrorail ....................................................................................... 42 3.3.1.4 Miami-Dade Transit - Metromover ................................................................................. 42 3.3.1.5 City of Miami Trolley ...................................................................................................... 42 3.3.1 Planned or Proposed Transit .................................................................................................................. 44 3.3.2.1 MDT Transit Development Plan ..................................................................................... 44 3.3.2.2 Metromover Expansion .................................................................................................. 45 3.3.2.3 Miami Regional Intermodal Plan .................................................................................... 45 3.3.2.4 Southeast Florida Regional Transportation Plan ........................................................... 45 3.3.2.5 All Aboard Florida / Brightline......................................................................................... 46 3.4 Underserved Markets and Transit Needs ................................................................................................................ 47 3.5 Transit Market Conclusions ..................................................................................................................................... 49 4. Alternatives Development and Evaluation ......................................................................................................................... 50 4.1 Preliminary ACT Alignment Alternatives .................................................................................................................. 51 4.1.1 Miami Beach to Convention Center Alignment ....................................................................................... 51 4.1.2 MacArthur Causeway to Watson Island Alignment................................................................................. 52 4.1.3 Watson Island to
Recommended publications
  • Railways of the MENA Region, Tools of National and Foreign Policy
    DHEEI – Mediterranean Studies Railways of the MENA Region, tools of national and foreign policy Master’s Thesis submitted by GALLOY Théophile Academic year: 2018-2019 Thesis Supervisor: Dr. Silvia Colombo Acknowledgements I wish to express my appreciation to my family, my co-students and CIFE for their valuable support throughout this year. I am also very grateful for the advice given by my fantastic supervisor Dr. Silvia Colombo, who has kindly dedicated some time to read, correct and advise me on my work, whilst allowing me to remain creative in my approach and research. I would also like to extend my thanks to my previous manager, Mr. Stephane Downes, and my previous employer, Mr. Stephane Rambaud-Measson, for opening me the doors of the railway industry and for passing on to me their knowledge and passion for this fascinating sector. I would also like to thank Dr. Ayadi Soufiane, the surgeon who successfully removed my infected appendix in Tunis, which allowed me to continue my work unimpeded. 2 Acknowledgements_____________________________________________________2 Table of Contents_______________________________________________________3 Introduction___________________________________________________________4 Part I: Understanding the political benefits of railway infrastructures______________6 1) The economic and social benefits of rail_____________________________6 2) Rail as a nation building infrastructure, a tool of power________________12 3) Rail as a region building infrastructure, a tool of integration____________19 Part II:
    [Show full text]
  • Five-Year Implementation Plan of the People’S Transportation Plan
    Five-Year Implementation Plan of the People’s Transportation Plan Eighth Annual Update ∙ Covering Fiscal Years 2020–2025 CITIZENS’ INDEPENDENT TRANSPORTATION MOVINGMOVINGMOVING TRUST FORWARDFORWARDFORWARD PTP Five-Year Plan Update Five-Year Implementation Plan of the People’s Transportation Plan (PTP) Eighth Annual Update – Covering Fiscal Years 2020 to 2025 Citizens’ Independent Transportation Trust and Miami-Dade County Chairman’s Message As I embark on my new role as the Chairman of the Citizens’ Independent Transportation Trust (Transportation Trust), I’m reminded that Miami-Dade County is a great place to live, work and play. Public Transportation plays a vital role in both the economic and physical health of our residents and offers great benefits to the community. The Transportation Trust is dedicated to its core responsibilities-- to provide oversight of the People’s Transportation Plan (PTP) funds and develop proactive plans that meet the challenges of improving public transportation in our community. My fellow Trust Members and I remain committed in safeguarding the public’s money and we work diligently to maintain their confidence ensuring that the half-penny transportation Surtax funds are spent as intended. We are excited about the accomplishments made with the half-penny Surtax thus far and look forward to continuing to fulfill our remaining promises by implementing the Strategic Miami Area Rapid Transit (SMART) Plan. Miami-Dade County desires to provide a public transportation system that keeps pace with the needs of this growing population and their transportation needs. I serve on the Transportation Trust because I believe in the potential of this community and residents of Miami-Dade County deserve a first-class transportation system.
    [Show full text]
  • Comprehensive Plan with EAR Amendments
    Volume 1 MIAMI COMPREHENSIVE NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN GOALS OBJECTIVES POLICIES City of Miami Planning Department 444 SW 2nd Avenue • Miami, FL 33130 July 2010 The Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan was adopted as Ordinance 10544 on February 9, 1989 and has been amended by the City Commission through July 22, 2010. Volume 1 MIAMI COMPREHENSIVE NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN GOALS OBJECTIVES POLICIES TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF AMENDING ORDINANCES .......................................................................................... V FUTURE LAND USE ........................................................................................................................ 1 URBAN CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT ..................................................................................................... 13 The Downtown Miami Master Plan ........................................................................................... 13 REGIONAL ACTIVITY CENTERS ................................................................................................................ 14 Buena Vista Yards Regional Activity Center .................................................................................. 15 Health District Regional Activity Center ........................................................................................ 16 INTERPRETATION OF THE FUTURE LAND USE PLAN MAP ................................................................ 17 CONSERVATION ..................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Cable Transport Equipment Cable Handling & Storage Engineering
    Brochure 2015 Engineering Cable Cable handling & storage transport Equipment 02 About Oceanteam Solutions Oceanteam Solutions focuses on solution driven offshore services • Cable transport by combining strong engineering and equipment capabilities. This • Cable storage way it can support its clients’ offshore cable, pipeline and umbilical installations, transport and storage projects in the most beneficial • Cable handling way. • Deck spread Our marine asset business unit designs, builds and owns a large • Engineering pool of demountable turntables and additional equipment for a • Human resources variety of cables, umbilicals, pipes and flowlines. Business unit KCI designs and engineers complete platforms, infrastructure and innovative equipment based on 28 years of expertise. Our company is known for its reliability, flexibility and pro-active approach. With our long term inhouse experience we ensure the most effective solutions, no matter how complex the project. 03 Turntables Oceanteam Solutions designs, builds and owns a large pool of various sizes demountable turntables with a capacity of up to 5000t. We have 10t and 15t track tensioners and a variety of burial equipment, reel drive systems and associated lay equipment. From our base in Velsen Noord the Netherlands, with deepwater quayside facilities, we can accommodate all sizes of vessels for mobilisation and demobilisation with easy access to the North Sea. Our company is specialised in building demountable turntable systems which can be delivered in 40ft containers to all ports globally. We can design and produce turntables in various sizes, for onshore and offshore use and for a variety of cables, umbilicals, pipes or flowlines. We are known for delivering quality equipment and services within limited time; our turntables can be built within a 3 month timeframe.
    [Show full text]
  • San Francisco, California
    Compressed Area - 4.5 Miles 2.5 Miles B C D E F G H J K L M N P Q R Fort Point Blue & Gold Blue & Gold Golden Gate Bridge San Francisco Bay Red & Fleet to Vallejo, Fleet to Jack London Square Cable Car Route (toll south bound) San Francisco, California USA White Fleet Angel Island 1 San Francisco Bay Cruise Sausalito & & Oakland 1 Street Car (F-Line) Maritime Tiburon & Bay Cruise Golden Gate National Recreation Area Alcatraz Ferry Service MasonCrissy St Field National PIER Historical Park 45 43 41 39 One Way Traffic 47 431/2 Pre Marina Green s Hyde St id l io Aquatic End of One Way Traffic l Pa rkwa Marina Blvd Pier d y e Lin Park v co l w Cervantes Blvd Pier 35 Direction of The Walt l Jefferson St o n B MARINA Fort Mason The Disney Cruise Terminal Highway Ramps D B n Family Cannery Anchorage 2 l E 2 c m 33 l FISHERMANS o Museum Photo Vantage Points v ba M c Beach St Beach St (Main Post) d Palace rc n a Ghirardelli & Scenic Views i WHARF d Baker of Fine Arts L e GGNRA Square North Point St ro 31 BART Station Beach North Point St Headquarters t Shopping Area S Bay St Bay St Bay St Pier 27 a Alcatraz Departure Terminal Parks br James R. Herman m Cruise Terminal R Alha Moscone Francisco St Francisco St 3 Beaches Letterman i Lincoln Blvd c 3 h Rec Ctr THE Veterans Blvd Digital Arts a Chestnut St Points of Interest Center Ave r Chestnut St TELEGRAPH EMBARCADERO ds “Crookedest HILL o Hospitals n d Lombard St Gen.
    [Show full text]
  • Feasibility Study in Doha, Qatar
    Journal of Unmanned Vehicle Systems AERIAL ROPEWAY SYSTEM- FEASIBILITY STUDY IN DOHA, QATAR Journal: Journal of Unmanned Vehicle Systems Manuscript ID juvs-2020-0028.R2 Manuscript Type: Article Date Submitted by the 26-Jan-2021 Author: Complete List of Authors: Tahmasseby, Shahram; Qatar University College of Engineering, aerial ropeway system, ridership, capital cost, operation and Keyword: maintenance, revenue Is the invited manuscript for Draft consideration in a Special Not applicable (regular submission) Issue, Collection, or competition? : © The Author(s) or their Institution(s) Page 1 of 30 Journal of Unmanned Vehicle Systems AERIAL ROPEWAY SYSTEM FEASIBILITY STUDY IN DOHA, QATAR Dr. Shahram TAHMASSEBY a Qatar Transportation and Traffic Center(QTTSC), College of Engineering-Qatar University, Doha, Qatar ABSTRACT Aerial ropeway systems, also called gondolas and aerial cable cars, are amongst driverless transportation modes, which are progressively drawing the attention in promoting tourism. Aerial ropeway systems have been operated in touristic spots e.g., over lakes, rivers, and hilly lands in several countries. Passengers can enjoy a view from the above and experience a stress-free and reliable trip. Furthermore, those systems can be exploited as a public transportation in urbanized and populated regions. The objective of this article is to investigate the viability of implementing a gondola line flying over Doha Bay in Qatar as a tourist attraction from the marketing, economic, and environmental point of view. In this study, the associated costs (capital, maintenance, and operating) of implementing a monocable detachable gondola technology(MDG) are estimatedDraft using international best practices in the world. The economic analysis outcome demonstrates that the revenues generated from the fares could counterweigh the required capital investment as well as operating and maintenance costs and hence the proposed gondola could be economically attractive for investors.
    [Show full text]
  • Register Your Interest and Keep Abreast with the Information
    REGISTER NOW at uitp-mena.com 2 Under the Honorary Patronage of His Highness Sheikh Hamdan Bin Mohammed Bin Rashid Al-Maktoum Dubai Crown Prince and Chairman of The Dubai Executive Council 3 Urban Mobility: Think Big Act Smart How to enhance mobility while reducing congestion, accidents and pollution is a common challenge to all major cities in the world. While the world population is expected to grow to 8.3 billion by 2030, public transport will remain the backbone of multi-modal mobility services in the future. The future market will have options within multi-modal mobility. As per UITP’s Grow with Public Transport Strategy, almost 60% of the world’s population will be living in urban areas by 2025. This implies that people will want and need to make more journeys. Urban Mobility: Think Big Act Smart is the slogan of 2016 MENA Transport Congress & exhibition. This slogan is selected to ensure that we liberate the cities of the future from the environmental, economic and social consequences of traffic congestion. The congress program will attract governments, city authorities and transport professionals from different part of the world in order to share knowledge and experience. MENA Transport Congress & Exhibition & National Association of Public Transport has joint ventured to stage school transport conference together, thus enhancing the program. The public transport authorities of the region are also keen and investing in school transport operation projects like Roads and Transports Authority (RTA) who has recently established a school transport department and ventured into school transport operation aiming at providing safe and smooth transport for all students of different ages.
    [Show full text]
  • The World's Longest 3S Gondola Russia Is Rapidly Expanding Its Ski Tourism
    September 2007 No. 173 • 32nd Year Garaventa has built an 80-passenger reversible aerial tramway not far from Antalya on the Turkish Riviera. The tram operates all year round p.8 The world’s first Mountain Glider At the Walibi entertainment park in at the Walibi entertainment park near Brussels p.2 Belgium, the world’s first Mountain Glider Canada: the world’s longest 3S gondola has met with an enthusiastic response from The Whistler-Blackcomb ski resort has a string of superlatives in store p.4 young and old alike p.2 Russia is rapidly expanding its ski tourism Gazprom builds six Doppelmayr lifts in the Olympic region of Sotchi p.7 Urban ropeways for three Algerian cities Ropeways have been accepted as a means of transport in urban areas p.14 Magazine for Customers and Employees 2 Doppelmayr/Garaventa Group Belgium has the world’s first Mountain Glider The Walibi entertainment June 16, 2007, was the day it all began. along the track. The carriers swing for- park near Brussels in Since then, visitors to the Walibi Park ward and backward as well as to the have been able to fulfill one of man’s old- side, avoiding uncomfortable laterally Belgium1 has added a est dreams and experience a bird’s eye acting forces. The fact that a lap bar is new ride to its list of view of the world. sufficient to ensure passenger safety and attractions: It now boasts the seats are open accentuates the illu- the first Mountain Glider Breathtaking launch … sion of flying. worldwide.
    [Show full text]
  • The People's Railway
    Part 1: A Brief History of Muni (the People’s Railway) Presented by Robin Reitzes, Deputy City Attorney 1 Transit’s Beginning - 1851 Horse-drawn omnibuses owned by private, for- profit companies, pictured around the turn of the century. 2 1873 Inventor of the cable car – Andrew Hallidie – pictured on the side of an early car 3 Labor Trouble Around the turn of the 20th century, many smaller, privately operated transit companies consolidated. The corruption and callous labor practices of one company, the United Railroads (which became the Market St. Railway), led to a bond measure in 1909 for a municipally owned system. Carbarn interior, c. 1917. Strikebreakers were housed in these facilities during the protracted strike of 1917. 4 5 Opening Day of the People’s Railway – December 28, 1912 (Geary near Grant St.) 6 City purchases MSRY Co. September 29, 1944 — the privately owned Market Street Railway Company turned over all its assets, including more than 500 streetcars, to the San Francisco Municipal Railway, following approval of San Francisco voters to buy the private company. 7 Cable Cars Three years later (1947), Mayor Lapham tried to kill off the Powell St. cable car line. Friedel Klussman created the Citizen’s Committee to save the cable cars and put a charter amendment on the ballot to save the Powell- Mason line and the Washington- Jackson line. The California St. line became part of Muni in 1952 when the private company went out of business. 8 Cable Cars, cont’d 1964 - cable cars listed on the National Register of Historic Places 1982-84 – entire cable car system restored.
    [Show full text]
  • White Paper: Urban Application of Aerial Cableway Technology
    WHITE PAPER: URBAN APPLICATION OF AERIAL CABLEWAY TECHNOLOGY WSP USA | June 2018 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY WSP USA is pleased to present the following white paper that summarizes the benefits and items for consideration of aerial cableway technology; outlines the project development process; and addresses advantages, costs and challenges associated with developing aerial cableway systems in urban environments. Urban applications of aerial cableway technology have been successfully integrated into transit networks in numerous cities around the globe, including the Portland Aerial Tram (Portland, Oregon) and Roosevelt Island Tram (New York, NY). Interest in aerial cableway technology has grown considerably in the United States in recent years, and initial feasibility studies have been completed in several U.S. cities, including San Diego, CA; Washington DC; and Brooklyn, NY. WSP is evaluating aerial cableway technology as an innovative first- and last-mile connection to regional transit in urban areas. Aerial cableway technology offers multiple benefits, including: relatively lower costs compared to other transportation modes, the ability to overcome significant changes in topography and other obstacles in natural and man-made environments, the ability to bypass congested roadways and transportation corridors, the ability to move high volumes of passengers: the equivalent of one city bus every minute, a streamlined design that fits into the urban environment, the potential to integrate transit-oriented development (TOD) near stations, and the ability to provide service between residential areas and key destinations. Many of these benefits have been realized in existing systems in La Paz, Bolivia, and Medellin, Colombia. Specifically, Medellin’s Line K transports more than 40,000 passengers per day between residential areas and the city center, reducing some commute times from more than an hour to approximately 10 minutes.
    [Show full text]
  • The Practical Design of Advanced Marine Vehicles
    The Practical Design of Advanced Marine Vehicles By: Chris B. McKesson, PE School of Naval Architecture and Marine Engineering College of Engineering University of New Orleans 2009 Version: Fall 2009 rev 0 This work sponsored by: US Office of Naval Research Grant No: N00014‐09‐1‐0145 1 2 CONTENTS 1 Summary & Purpose of this Textbook ................................................................................................ 27 1.1 Relationship of the Course to Program Outcomes ..................................................................... 28 1.2 Prerequisites ............................................................................................................................... 28 1.3 Resources .................................................................................................................................... 28 1.3.1 Numbered references cited in the text ................................................................................. 29 1.3.2 Important references not explicitly cited in the text ............................................................ 31 1.3.3 AMV Web Resources ............................................................................................................. 32 1.3.4 AMV Design Agents ............................................................................................................... 32 1.3.5 AMV Builders ......................................................................................................................... 33 2 A Note on Conventions ......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report (PDF)
    Andrew M. Cuomo Board of Directors Governor Darryl C. Towns, Chairperson Charlene M. Indelicato Fay Fryer Christian Dr. Katherine Teets Grimm President/Chief Executive Officer David Kraut Donald D. Lewis Robert L. Megna Vice President/General Counsel Roosevelt Island Operating Corporation of the State of New York Howard Polivy Steven Chironis 591 Main Street, Roosevelt Island, NY 10044 Michael Shinozaki Vice President/Chief Financial Officer T: (212) 832-4540 • F: (212) 832-4582 Margaret Smith http://rioc.ny.gov THE ROOSEVELT ISLAND OPERATING CORPORATION Public Authority Annual Report Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2013 Background The Roosevelt Island Operating Corporation of the State of New York ("RIOC") is a public benefit corporation and a political subdivision of the State of New York. RIOC was created by the New York State legislature, in 1984, to take responsibility, pursuant to a General Development Plan (GDP), for the development and operation of the 147 acres comprising the former Welfare Island, located in New York City's East River. RIOC assumed the role of the New York State Urban Development Corporation as lessee under a 99-year Master Lease (running until 2068) from the City of New York. The GDP, which has been amended from time to time, provides for the development of housing, shops and community facilities for a mixed income, handicap accessible, residential neighborhood. As an island community, Roosevelt Island requires specialized operations and capital infrastructure maintenance such as an aerial tramway, comprehensive garbage compacting system and seawall improvements. RIOC supplements the very basic services provided by the City of New York, and provides specialized operations and capital improvements.
    [Show full text]