DOCSLIB.ORG

Project Partners Steve Degeorge City of Oxnard U.S

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Project Partners Steve Degeorge City of Oxnard U.S Ventura County Transportation Commission Project Partners Steve DeGeorge City of Oxnard U.S. Fish and Wildlife Matthew Wineger Michael Henderson Jenny Marek Ashley Golden, Project Manager California Department of Fish and Game Rhea Voll Daniel Blankenship Earnel Bihis Sue Martin California Department of Transportation Paul Wendt David Lewis Cynthia Daniels Michael Klima Robert Hearne Cliff Waer, Senior Officer Channel Islands Bicycle Club Alta Planning + Design Neal Abramson George Hudson, Principal River Ridge Golf Course Mary Stewart, Project Manager Otto Kanny Emily Duchon, Designer State Coastal Conservancy Birge Engineering Peter Brand Gary Bradshaw, Project Manager Rio School District AMEC Rob Corley Daniel Gira, Project Manager The Nature Conservancy Ventura County Watershed Protection District Catherine McCalvin Gerard Kapuscik Ventura Coastkeeper Joseph Lampar Jason Weiner Ventura Regional Sanitation District Friends of the Santa Clara River Chi Herman Richard Sweet Table of Contents Chapter 1: Existing Conditions ..........................................................................................................................................................1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................................................1 Goals and Objectives .........................................................................................................................................................................2 Site Setting ............................................................................................................................................................................................. 4 Segment Analysis............................................................................................................................................................................... 12 Relevant Projects and Plans ....................................................................................................................................................... 25 Important Agencies/Partners .................................................................................................................................................... 28 Opportunities and Constraints ................................................................................................................................................ 29 Chapter 2: Summary of Gap Analysis, Geographic Impediments and Alternatives Analysis .................... 37 Gap Analysis ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 37 Geographic Impediments ............................................................................................................................................................40 Alignment Alternatives ..................................................................................................................................................................41 Preferred Alignment .......................................................................................................................................................................46 Chapter 3: Summary of Project Public Involvement .......................................................................................................... 55 Project Partners ................................................................................................................................................................................. 55 Stakeholder and Technical Advisory Committees ........................................................................................................ 56 Chapter 4: Entitlement Process and Policy Review........................................................................................................... 57 Potentially Required Permits .................................................................................................................................................... 57 Permit Triggers/Extra Info .......................................................................................................................................................... 60 Chapter 5: Benefit Cost Analysis .................................................................................................................................................. 65 Chapter 6: Summary of Design Guidelines, Maintenance Schedules and Best Practices .............................. 71 Design Guidelines ............................................................................................................................................................................. 71 Trail Design Features ..................................................................................................................................................................... 78 Safety and Maintenance Recommendations..................................................................................................................... 88 Project Implementation Plan ..................................................................................................................................................... 95 Funding Sources ............................................................................................................................................................................. 106 Appendix A: City of Oxnard Santa Clara River Trail Master Plan - Field Review Report Letter.................................................................................................................See separate document Appendix B: Public Involvement Meeting Notes ...................................................................See separate document Santa Clara River Trail Plan Chapter 1: Existing Conditions Introduction Background The Santa Clara River is an ecologically rich, valuable and beautiful ecosystem. It is one of the last remaining naturalized river systems in Southern California and home to several threatened and endangered species. The project site sits nestled between emerald green farmland to the west, the Santa Clara River to the north and the City of Oxnard to the south and east. The near perfect weather of the area enables the citizens of Oxnard to enjoy outdoor recreation year- round. In 1991, the Ventura County Watershed Protection District (VCWPD) and the California State Coastal The project site is located south of the Conservancy (CCC) initiated a management plan for Santa Clara River and north of the City of Oxnard. the Santa Clara River and its resources. In addition to the preservation of the river’s physical, biological, and economic resources, the management plan promoted the enhancement of recreational, education and public access opportunities. In response to the Santa Clara River Enhancement & Management Plan, the city is pursuing the opportunity for a multi-use trail system along the stream bank protection (SBP) and levee system on the southern bank of the Santa Clara River. The Santa Clara River Trail (SCRT) Master Plan project study area encompasses the southern bank of the Santa Clara River from Central Avenue in the northeast down to N. Victoria Avenue in the southwest as well as connections to W. Gonzales Road, currently a bicycle route to the Pacific Ocean. The Master Plan Process The purpose of the Santa Clara River Trail Master Plan is to evaluate a Class I multi-use path along the southern bank of the Santa Clara River. The study includes a review of existing setting and conditions, an analysis of gaps and geographic impediments, public outreach, a review of trail design standards and safety standard, an implementation program, as well as a financial element. The SCRT Master Plan includes a preferred alternative and the process followed to arrive at this recommendation. City of Oxnard | 1 Chapter 1: Existing Conditions Goals and Objectives A vision for increasing public access along the Santa Clara River has been supported by a number of agencies and non-profit groups for many years including: The California State Coastal Conservancy, Ventura County Watershed Protection District, and The Nature Conservancy. Building upon this regional vision, the following goals and objectives for the SCRT were developed with input from the City of Oxnard, the SCRT Steering Committee, and the SCRT Technical Advisory Committee. 1. Create a safe and attractive trail fully accessible to a wide variety of non- motorized activities for recreation and transportation. Coordinate with regional efforts to increase opportunities for recreation and transportation along the Santa Clara River Corridor. Build a trail that meets the Americans for Disabilities Act (ADA) Guidelines which will accommodate a diverse group of users of all ages including pedestrians, and bicyclists. Incorporate trail amenities to enhance the experience of the trail user such as: Scenic views along the Santa Clara River seating, interpretive elements, gateways, lighting, way-finding information, trail rules and regulations signage, and recycling/trash receptacles. 2. Provide connectivity to existing or planned trails, schools, parks, and other key destinations Establish strong access points to the SCRT. Establish strong access to the Pacific Ocean. Coordinate with City of Oxnard
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Revised Section 4.6 Biological Resources Draft Environmental
    Revised Section 4.6 Biological Resources Draft Environmental Impact Report SCH No. 2002091081 Prepared for: City of Santa Clarita Department of Planning & Building Services 23920 Valencia Boulevard, Suite 302 Santa Clarita, California 91355 Prepared by: Impact Sciences, Inc. 30343 Canwood Street, Suite 210 Agoura Hills, California 91301 March 2004 Revised Section 4.6 Biological Resources Draft Environmental Impact Report SCH No. 2002091081 Prepared for: City of Santa Clarita Department of Planning & Building Services 23920 Valencia Boulevard, Suite 302 Santa Clarita, California 91355 Prepared by: Impact Sciences, Inc. 30343 Canwood Street, Suite 210 Agoura Hills, California 91301 March 2004 Table of Contents Volume I: Environmental Impact Report Section Page Introduction....................................................................................................................I-1 Executive Summary ......................................................................................................ES-1 1.0 Project Description....................................................................................................... 1.0-1 2.0 Environmental and Regulatory Setting......................................................................... 2.0-1 3.0 Cumulative Impact Analysis Methodology .................................................................. 3.0-1 4.0 Environmental Impact Analyses................................................................................... 4.0-1 4.1 Geotechnical Hazards..........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Department of Design and Construction City and County of Honolulu Specifications and Legal Documents for Rehabilitation of Local
    DEPARTMENT OF DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION CITY AND COUNTY OF HONOLULU SPECIFICATIONS AND LEGAL DOCUMENTS FOR REHABILITATION OF LOCALIZED STREETS, PHASE 12A KALIHI, KALIHI VALLEY, KAMEHAMEHA HEIGHTS & ALEWA HEIGHTS AREAS OAHU, HAWAII Job No. SP14-01 NOVEMBER 2014 ROBERT J. KRONING, P.E. Director CONTACT PERSON: Earl Kobatake, P.E. Phone No. (808) 768-8435 CONTENTS JOB NO. SP14-01 REHABILITATION OF LOCALIZED STREETS, PHASE 12A KALIHI, KALIHI VALLEY, KAMEHAMEHA HEIGHTS & ALEWA HEIGHTS AREAS OAHU, HAWAII THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS FORMING THE CONTRACT CONSIST OF : NOTICE TO CONTRACTORS PROPOSAL SPECIAL PROVISIONS APPENDIX – PROJECT LIMITS, CONSTRUCTION NOTES AND FIGURES GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS, AUGUST 1, 2013 (Bound Separately) GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS, AUGUST 1, 2013 (Bound Separately) HAWAII ADMINISTRATIVE RULES, TITLE 3, DEPARTMENT OF ACCOUNTING AND GENERAL SERVICES (Bound Separately) STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION, SEPTEMBER 1986 (Bound Separately) STANDARD DETAILS FOR PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION, SEPTEMBER 1984 (Bound Separately) Contents NOTICE TO CONTRACTORS SEALED BIDS will be received up to and publicly opened and read aloud at 2:00 p.m. HST, Monday, December 22, 2014, in the Office of the Division of Purchasing, Department of Budget and Fiscal Services, City and County of Honolulu, City Hall, Room 115, Honolulu, Hawaii 96813, for: JOB NO. SP14-01 REHABILITATION OF LOCALIZED STREETS, PHASE 12A KALIHI, KALIHI VALLEY, KAMEHAMEHA HEIGHTS & ALEWA HEIGHTS AREAS OAHU, HAWAII Plans and specifications on CD ROM may be obtained at the above office on request. Proposals mailed outside of the Island of Oahu will be mailed air freight collect. Bidders shall be licensed in accordance with Chapter 444, HRS, relating to the licensing of contractors.
    [Show full text]
  • Notice of Intent, Notice of Preparation, Scoping Meeting Sign-In
    United States Department of Defense, et al., "Notice of Intent, Notice of Preparation, Scoping Meeting Sign-In Sheet, Scoping Meeting Request to Speak/Written Comment Forms, Scoping Meeting Transcript, and Related Comment Letters" (August 2005) 41380 Federal Register/Vol. 70, No. 137/Tuesday, July 19, 2005/Notices including suggestions for reducing this DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: burden to the General Services Questions about the proposed action Administration, FAR Secretariat (VIR), Department of the Army; Corps of and Draft EIS/EIR can be answered by 1800 F Street, NW, Room 4035, Engineers Dr, Aaron O. Allen, Corps Project Washington, DC 20405. Manager, at (805) 585-2148. Comments Intent To Prepare a Draft shall be addressed to: U.S. Army Corps FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Environmental Impact Statement! of Engineers, Los Angeles District, Jeremy Olson, Contract Policy Division, Environmental Impact Report (DEIS! Ventura Field Office, ATTN: File GSA (202) 501-3221. DEIR) for Proposed Future Permit Number 2003-01264-AOA, 2151 Actions Under Section 404 of the Clean SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Alessandro Drive, Suite 110, Ventura, Water Act for the Newhall Ranch CA 93001. Alternatively, comments can A. Purpose Specific Plan and Associated Facilities be e-mailed to: Along Portions of the Santa Clara Aaron,O.AIlen@usace,army,mil. Advance payments may be authorized River and Its Side Drainages, and under Federal contracts and Development of a Candidate SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: subcontracts, Advance payments are the Conservation Agreement with 1, Project Site and Background least preferred method of contract Assurances (CCAA) for the San Information, The Newhall Ranch site is financing and require special Fernando Valley Spineflower, in Los located in northern Los Angeles County determinations by the agency head or Angeles County, California, With the and encompasses approximately 12,000 designee.
    [Show full text]
  • Recycled Glass in Asphalt
    CWC Best Practices in Glass Recycling Recycled Glass in Asphalt Material: Recycled Glass Issue: Asphalt containing glass cullet as an aggregate is called “glassphalt,” and has been widely tried as a means to dispose of surplus waste glass since the 1960’s. Glassphalt is basically the same as conventional hot-mix asphalt, except that 5% to 40% of the rock and/or sand aggregate is replaced by crushed glass. The cost-effectiveness of substituting glass for conventional aggregate is highly dependent on the location, the quality and cost of local aggregates, and any credits available for using recycled materials in beneficial re-use applications. Best Practice: This Best Practice discusses the benefits and applicability of glassphalt. For details on the preparation and installation of glassphalt, refer to the Preparation and Placement of Glassphalt Best Practice. For a complete discussion of the history of glassphalt also refer to the Glasphalt Paving Handbook (2) . Glassphalt was originally developed as an alternative to landfill disposal of mixed color waste glass. Mixed color glass, which is unsuitable for recycling into new containers, is generated by most recycling programs. If there are no alternative local markets for mixed color glass and the only other option is disposal with landfill tip fees, using processed glass as a substitute for natural aggregate in asphalt may be an option to be considered. A great number of glassphalt demonstration projects have been performed in cities around the country. Most of these projects have not progressed past the pilot stage because of economics. It is not economical in most parts of the United States to collect glass, process it to a specification aggregate, blend the glass with natural aggregate, add the batch modifiers needed to meet specifications, and deal with the operational changes required for glassphalt.
    [Show full text]
  • Cullet Supply Issues and Technologies David Rue
    Cullet Supply Issues and Technologies David Rue The Glass Manufacturing Industry Council White Paper on Cullet Utilization and Opportunities is funded entirely by GMIC and is provided to all interested parties at no charge Cullet Supply Issues and Technologies October, 2018 The objective of this study is to provide information to assist GMIC members in gaining a better understanding of ways in which more post-consumer cullet can be recycled and to investigate technical changes GMIC could catalyze to make that happen. This White Paper Study was led by David Rue with input from Robert Lipetz (GMIC Executive Director) and input from experts on collection, processing, characterization, procurement, and re-use of cullet. The opinions of experts are often but not always in agreement. Efforts have been made to include input from all parties. To obtain the most open possible input, the names of all respondents have been excluded from this document. No proprietary information is included. Several company names are included, with the understanding that these references are for illustration and informational purposes and not as endorsement of the companies themselves. Introduction Glass is 100% recyclable. Recycled glass competes with raw material batch and must rely on cost to drive utilization. A wide range of factors affect the cost of cullet to the glass companies. Most surveys (EPA, Container Recycling Institute, GPI) agree that roughly 11 million tons of glass is disposed of each year in the US, and 32-34% of that glass is recycled. Approximately 2.7 million tons were recycled to container glass and 1 million tons to fiberglass in 2017 (Resource Recovery magazine, 2018).
    [Show full text]
  • Alta Trail Surfaces
    [email protected] (877) 347-5417 WWW.ALTAPLANNING.COM NORTHERN CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA PACIFIC NORTHWEST NEW ENGLAND What’s Under Foot? Multi-use Trail Surfacing Options by George Hudson, Principal, Alta Planning + Design When approaching a trail project, trail designers and local agency representatives often assume their trail will be surfaced with asphalt or perhaps concrete if budget allows. These are some of the most common and acceptable materials used on trails. But this may not be what local residents had in mind when the trail idea was initially conceived. Or, local residents may not have considered the trail surface until a specific surface was proposed, and then suddenly everyone has an opinion. Trails typically serve a transportation function but most trail users do not want a trail to appear as a mini-roadway. This often leads designers into an exploration of possible trail surfacing options. These conflicts often lead designers into exploring possible trail surfacing options (of which there are more every year), including: traditional asphalt and concrete limestone treated surfaces permeable asphalt and concrete rubberized surfaces, such as "Nike Grind" commercial soil stabilizers organic surfaces, such as bark mulch and geotextile confinement systems wood planer shavings chip seal agricultural by-products, such as filbert shells crusher fines wood, in the form of boardwalks In arriving at a recommended trail surface, several key criteria should be considered including: Initial Capital Cost – Trail surface costs vary dramatically and dollars to build trails are scarce. Construction costs include excavation, subbase preparation, aggregate base placement, and application of the selected trail surface.
    [Show full text]
  • Effect of Waste Glass on Properties of Asphalt Concrete Mixtures
    Jordan Journal of Civil Engineering, Volume 11, No. 1, 2017 Effect of Waste Glass on Properties of Asphalt Concrete Mixtures 1) 2) 3) 4) Zaydoun T. Abu Salem , Taisir S. Khedawi , Musa Bani Baker and Raed Abendeh 1),3),4) Al-Zaytoonah University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan. 2) Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan. ABSTRACT With the rapid economy growth and continuously increased consumption, a large amount of glass waste materials is generated. This study attends to study the performance of asphalt concrete mix, where some of fractional fine aggregate is substituted with different percentages of crashed glass materials of 5%, 10%, 15% and 20 %. The Marshall design was used to examine the influence of the Optimum Asphalt Content (O.A.C.) at different fine glass percentages and the resistance against water. Asphalt-concrete mix properties can be improved by using a hydrated lime admixture and other mixtures. It is expected that the recycling and use of waste glass in asphalt mixes is feasible. Subsequently, by obtaining low price and economic mixes that will reduce the O.A.C., increase the stability and the durability of the mix, in addition to increasing the skid resistance of the road surface, this will reduce accidents and save a lot of money. By crushing and sieving, waste glass materials can be used as fine aggregates in asphalt concrete, where this is called glassphalt. Satisfactory performance of upper asphalt pavement layers can be achieved by adding glass waste with 10% of the mix. KEYWORDS: Glass waste, Water stability, Skid resistance, Optimum asphalt content (O.A.C.).
    [Show full text]
  • Board Agenda and Report Packet
    A Joint Powers Authority BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING AGENDA Monday, January 25, 2021 - 1:00 PM NCTC JPA Board Meeting Virtual Zoom Board Meeting Attendee Info: Join from a PC, Mac, iPad, iPhone or Android device: Please click this URL to join. Please click link below to Join Virtual Zoom Board Meeting – https://us02web.zoom.us/j/83120894191?pwd=TmpWVGlqMHRzU0hmWnlYZU1zSDdlZz09 Meeting ID: 831 2089 4191 Passcode: 949130 One tap mobile +16699009128,,83120894191#,,,,*949130# US (San Jose) +13462487799,,83120894191#,,,,*949130# US (Houston) Dial by your location +1 669 900 9128 US (San Jose) +1 346 248 7799 US (Houston) +1 253 215 8782 US (Tacoma) +1 646 558 8656 US (New York) +1 301 715 8592 US (Washington D.C) +1 312 626 6799 US (Chicago) Meeting ID: 831 2089 4191 Passcode: 949130 International numbers available: https://us02web.zoom.us/u/kbRWCbB1Ao North County Transportation Coalition JPA www.northcountytransportationcoalition.org 44933 N. Fern Avenue, c/o City of Lancaster, Lancaster CA 93534 Page 1 of 5 NCTC JPA BOARD OF DIRECTORS BOARD MEMBERS Chair, Supervisor Kathryn Barger, 5th Supervisorial District, County of Los Angeles Mark Pestrella, Director of Public Works, County of Los Angeles Victor Lindenheim, County of Los Angeles Austin Bishop, Council Member, City of Palmdale Laura Bettencourt, Council Member, City of Palmdale Bart Avery, City of Palmdale Marvin Crist, Vice Mayor, City of Lancaster Kenneth Mann, Council Member, City of Lancaster Jason Caudle, City Manager, City of Lancaster Marsha McLean, Council Member, City of Santa Clarita Robert Newman, Director of Public Works, City of Santa Clarita Vacant, City of Santa Clarita EX-OFFICIO BOARD MEMBERS Macy Neshati, Antelope Valley Transit Authority Adrian Aguilar, Santa Clarita Transit BOARD MEMBER ALTERNATES Dave Perry, County of Los Angeles Juan Carrillo, Council Member, City of Palmdale Mike Hennawy, City of Santa Clarita NCTC JPA STAFF Executive Director: Arthur V.
    [Show full text]
  • Design Guidelines Manual Golden State Corridor
    DESIGN GUIDELINES MANUAL GOLDEN STATE CORRIDOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS September 2011 GOLDEN STATE CORRIDOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS DESIGN GUIDELINES MANUAL Prepared for: Fresno Council of Governments 2035 Tulare Street, Suite 201 Fresno, California 93721 Contact Person: Lauren Dawson Phone: (559) 233-4148 Consultant: 5110 West Cypress Avenue Visalia, California 93277 Contact: Meredith Inglehart Phone: (559) 733-0440 Fax: (559) 733-7821 September 2011 © Copyright by Quad Knopf, Inc. Unauthorized use prohibited. 100073 Table of Contents Chapter 1 – Background ............................................................................................................................................. 1-1 1.1 Introduction and Purpose ..................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Design Manual Organization ................................................................................................................. 1-3 Chapter 2 – Context ................................................................................................................................................... 2-1 2.1 Regional Context ................................................................................................................................... 2-1 2.2 Local Context ......................................................................................................................................... 2-1 2.3 Golden
    [Show full text]
  • Energy Implications of Glass-Container Recycling
    ANUESD-18 N REUTP-430-5703 A Joint Effort • ••·-· •• Energy Systems Division ·-· National Renewable Argonne National Laboratory • Energy Laboratory Operated by the University of Chicago Operated by Midwest Research Institute for the U.S. Department of Energy for the U.S. Department of Energy under Contract W-31-1 09-Eng-38 under Contract DE-AC02-83-CH1 0093 Authors: L. L. Gaines Technical Monitor: Philip B. Shepherd M. M. Mintz Argonne National Laboratory and the National Renewable Energy Laboratont are part of the national laboratory system to the U.S. Department of En• ANUESD-18 NREUTP-430-5703• UC Category: 249 • DE94000288 L.L. Gaines & M.M. Mintz Argonne National Laboratory Argonne, Illinois Technical Monitor: Philip B. Shepherd A Joint Effort .. ••·-· •• Energy Systems Division ·-· National Renewable Argonne National Laboratory • Energy Laboratory Operated by the University of Chicago Operated by Midwest Research Institute for the U.S. Department of Energy for the U.S. Department of Energy under Contract W-31 -1 09-Eng-38 under Contract DE-AC02-83-CH1 0093 This report was prepared under Task #WM41 .1 01 0 and Subcontract #DA-1 -1 1157-1 March, 1994 NOTICE NOTICE: This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States government. Neither the United States government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or processdisclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights.
    [Show full text]
  • Plan Santa Clarita 2020 Newsletter 2015
    Santa Clarita Public Safety Building and Creating Community Enhancing Economic Vitality Community Beautication Sustaining Public Infrastructure Proactive, Transparent and Responsive Government Services The City will keep Santa Clarita as one of the nation’s safest communities by providing high The City will build vital infrastructure and provide services and programs that enrich a growing The City will strengthen and grow the Santa Clarita economy by fostering economic The City will create and maintain an aesthetically and visually pleasing community, which The City will maintain the safety, quality and value of our public infrastructure, which will be The City will provide the highest quality municipal services consistent with the values in our City To Our Valuable City Employees: quality public safety services and facilities and preserving the integrity of neighborhoods, and diverse community, which will be accomplished in the following ways: development, lm and tourism, and provide business friendly services that result in quality will be accomplished in the following ways: accomplished in the following ways: Philosophy Statement, which will be accomplished in the following ways: Vision, anticipation and prioritization are essential elements in preparing for a successful which will be accomplished in the following ways: jobs, increased retail activity and the attraction of new investments, which will be 1. Work with the Senior Center to support the construction of the new Santa Clarita Valley Senior Center. Vision, anticipation and prioritization are essential elements in preparing for a successful future and to future and to ensure the City of Santa Clarita continues to provide superior municipal accomplished in the following ways: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Heritage Rail Trail Feasibility Study 2017
    TOWN OF DEDHAM HERITAGE RAIL TRAIL FEASIBILITY STUDY 2017 PLANNING DEPARTMENT + ENVIRONMENTAL DEPARTMENT ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We gratefully recognize the Town of Dedham’s dedicated Planning and Environmental Department’s staff, including Richard McCarthy, Town Planner and Virginia LeClair, Environmental Coordinator, each of whom helped to guide this feasibility study effort. Their commitment to the town and its open space system will yield positive benefits to all as they seek to evaluate projects like this potential rail trail. Special thanks to the many representatives of the Town of Dedham for their commitment to evaluate the feasibility of the Heritage Rail Trail. We also thank the many community members who came out for the public and private forums to express their concerns in person. The recommendations contained in the Heritage Rail Trail Feasibility Study represent our best professional judgment and expertise tempered by the unique perspectives of each of the participants to the process. Cheri Ruane, RLA Vice President Weston & Sampson June 2017 Special thanks to: Virginia LeClair, Environmental Coordinator Richard McCarthy, Town Planner Residents of Dedham Friends of the Dedham Heritage Rail Trail Dedham Taxpayers for Responsible Spending Page | 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction and Background 2. Community Outreach and Public Process 3. Base Mapping and Existing Conditions 4. Rail Corridor Segments 5. Key Considerations 6. Preliminary Trail Alignment 7. Opinion of Probable Cost 8. Phasing and Implementation 9. Conclusion Page | 2 Introduction and Background Weston & Sampson was selected through a proposal process by the Town of Dedham to complete a Feasibility Study for a proposed Heritage Rail Trail in Dedham, Massachusetts.
    [Show full text]