Technology Integration

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Technology Integration Technology Integration 2018 Annual Progress Report Vehicle Technologies Office (This page intentionally left blank) FY 2018 Annual Progress Report Disclaimer This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the Unites States government. Neither the United States government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, expressed or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the Unites States government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States government or any agency thereof. Disclaimer i Technology Integration Acknowledgements We would like to acknowledge the principal investigators and their teams from industry, academia, the national laboratories, and Clean Cities coalitions who prepared the project abstracts. In addition, we would like to thank the project managers at the National Energy Technology Laboratory for their continuing support in administering these projects. We would also like to express our appreciation to Allegheny Science and Technology (AST) for their technical support in preparing, editing, compiling, and publishing the 2018 Technology Integration Annual Progress Report. ii Acknowledgements FY 2018 Annual Progress Report Acronyms AAA American Automobile Association AAPEX Automotive Aftermarket Products Expo ADAS Advanced Driver Assistance Systems AEO Arkansas Energy Office AFDC Alternative Fuels Data Center AFLEET Tool Alternative Fuel Life-Cycle Environmental and Economic Transportation Tool AFPR Alternative Fuel Price Report AFV alternative fuel vehicle AHJ authority having jurisdiction API application programming interface ARA Automotive Recyclers Association ASME IMECE American Society of Mechanical Engineers, International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition ASU Arizona State University AVTC Advanced Vehicle Technology Competition BEV battery electric vehicle BMV Bureau of Motor Vehicles CARB California Air Resources Board CAV connected and automated vehicles CH2 compressed hydrogen CNG compressed natural gas CSULA California State University Los Angeles CSU Colorado State University CTE Center for Transportation and the Environment CTS Contract Transportation Services CVEF Clean Vehicle Education Foundation DC direct current Acronyms iii Technology Integration DCFC direct current fast charger DFWCC Dallas-Fort Worth Clean Cities DOE Department of Energy DOER Department of Energy Resources DOT Department of Transportation E&EC emissions and energy consumption EEL energy efficient logistics EEMS energy efficient mobility systems EERE Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy EIA Energy Information Administration EISA Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 EPA Environmental Protection Agency EPAct Energy Policy Act of 1992 ERAU Embry Riddle Aeronautical University EV electric vehicle EVI-Pro Electric Vehicle Infrastructure Projection EVSE electric vehicle supply equipment F4F Fleets for the Future FAST Act Fixing America’s Surface Transportation Act FCDICE Fire College Department of Insurance Continuing Education System FCG Filling Critical Gaps FDACS OOE Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Office of Energy FEI Fuel Economy Information FEMA Federal Emergency Management Agency FHWA Federal Highway Administration FOA funding opportunity announcement FSEC Florida Solar Energy Center FSFC Florida State Fire College iv Acronyms FY 2018 Annual Progress Report FY fiscal year GHG greenhouse gas GIS geographic information system GM General Motors GNA Gladstein, Neandross & Associates GNHCCC Greater New Haven Clean Cities Coalition GREET Greenhouse gases, Regulated Emissions, and Energy use in Transportation GT Georgia Tech GTI Gas Technology Institute H2 hydrogen HDV heavy duty vehicle HEV hybrid-electric vehicle IAEM International Association of Emergency Managers ICC International Code Council IEEE Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers INCOG Indian Nations Council of Governments INL Idaho National Laboratory iREV Initiative for Resiliency in Energy through Vehicles iREV-T iREV Tracking Tool L2 level 2 LCF Louisiana Clean Fuels LDV light duty vehicle LNG liquefied natural gas LPG liquefied petroleum gas (propane) LSCFA Lone Star Clean Fuels Alliance M2M Michigan to Montana MAC McMaster University MACPP Mid-America Council for Public Procurement Acronyms v Technology Integration MAPC Metropolitan Area Planning Council MARC Mid-America Regional Council MEC Metropolitan Energy Center Midwest Midwest Electric Vehicle Opportunities: Learning eVents, Experience EVOLVE MOVES Motor Vehicle Emission Simulator MPG miles per gallon MPH miles per hour MPO metropolitan planning organization MSADA Massachusetts State Auto Dealers Association MSU Mississippi State University MWCOG Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments MSRP manufacturer’s suggested retail price MY model year NAFTC National Alternative Fuels Training Consortium NAFTD North American Fire Training Directors NARC National Association of Regional Councils NASA National Aeronautics and Space Administration NASEO National Association of State Energy Officials NASPO National Association of State Procurement Officers NATA North American Towing Academy NCCETC North Carolina Clean Energy Technology Center NCTCOG North Central Texas Council of Governments NDEW National Drive Electric Week NESCAUM Northeast States for Coordinated Air Use Management NFPA National Fire Protection Association NGA National Governors Association NGV natural gas vehicle NHTSA National Highway Traffic Safety Administration vi Acronyms FY 2018 Annual Progress Report NIRPC Northern Indiana Regional Planning Commission NOI notice of intent NOx oxides of nitrogen NREL National Renewable Energy Laboratory NTEA National Truck Equipment Association OEM original equipment manufacturer ORNL Oak Ridge National Laboratory OSU Ohio State University PAG Pima Association of Governments PDF portable document format PEV plug-in electric vehicle PGE Portland General Electric PHEV plug-in hybrid electric vehicle PI principal investigator PIA Plug In America PSU Pennsylvania State University PY project year RPC Regional Planning Commission RFI request for information RFP request for proposals SADI Southeast Alternative Fuel Vehicle Demonstration Initiative SAE Society of Automotive Engineers SAFE Securing America’s Future Energy SCORM Shareable Content Object Reference Model SCOS Smart Columbus Operating System SDOT Seattle Department of Transportation SEAFDP Southeast Alternative Fuel Deployment Program SEMA Specialty Equipment Market Association Acronyms vii Technology Integration SMART Systems and Modeling for Accelerated Research in Transportation STEM science technology engineering and mathematics SUV sport utility vehicle TA technical assistance TC4 Twin Cities Clean Cities Coalition TCO total cost of ownership TIC Technologist in Cities TJCOG Triangle J Council of Governments TRB Transportation Research Board TRS Technical Response Service UA University of Alabama UCCC Utah Clean Cities Coalition UCF University of Central Florida UF utility factor USU Utah State University UT University of Tennessee, Knoxville UU University of Utah UW University of Washington UWAFT University of Waterloo Alternative Fuels Team VT Virginia Tech VTO Vehicle Technologies Office VW Volkswagen WSU Wayne State University WTW well to wheels WVU West Virginia University ZEV zero emission vehicle viii Acronyms FY 2018 Annual Progress Report Executive Summary The FY 2018 Technology Integration Annual Progress Report covers 28 multi-year projects funded by the Vehicle Technologies Office. The report includes information on 21 competitively awarded projects, ranging from training on alternative fuels and vehicles for first responders, to safety training and design for maintenance facilities housing gaseous fuel vehicles, to electric vehicle community partner programs. It also includes seven projects conducted by several of VTO’s national laboratory partners, Argonne National Laboratory, Oak Ridge National Laboratory and the National Renewable Energy Laboratory. These projects range from a Technical Assistance project for business, industry, government and individuals, to the EcoCar 3 Student Competition, and the Fuel Economy Information Project. The projects involve partnerships between private industry, the public sector and, in many cases, non-profit organizations, and incorporate an educational component designed to enable the sharing of best practices and lessons learned. Data collected from these projects is used to inform the future direction of VTO-funded research. Executive Summary ix Technology Integration Table of Contents Vehicle Technologies Office Overview ............................................................................................................ 1 Organization Chart ............................................................................................................................................. 1 Technology Integration Program Overview ...................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • AUTOMOTIVE AFTERMARKET OUTLOOK and REFLECTIONS from OUR Nd 42 ANNUAL SYMPOSIUM October 29 – October 30, 2018
    GAMCO Investors, Inc. November 21, 2018 One Corporate Center Rye, NY 10580-1435 Tel (914) 921-5150 www.gabelli.com AUTOMOTIVE AFTERMARKET OUTLOOK AND REFLECTIONS FROM OUR nd 42 ANNUAL SYMPOSIUM October 29 – October 30, 2018 PRESENTING COMPANIES 10/31/2018 10/31/2017 11/1/2016 Company Exchange Ticker Price (a) Price (a) Price (a) AutoZone, Inc NYSE AZO $ 733.47 $ 589.50 $ 734.45 Boyd Group Income Fund (b) TSX BYD.UN 120.31 96.10 81.17 BYD Company Ltd (c) SHE 002594 46.79 62.79 55.57 Cooper Tire & Rubber Co. NYSE CTB 30.89 32.80 35.10 Dana, Inc. " DAN 15.47 30.49 15.00 Donaldson Company, Inc " DCI 51.28 47.21 35.46 Gentex Corporation NASDAQ GNTX 21.05 19.04 15.96 Genuine Parts Co. NYSE GPC 97.92 88.23 86.43 Lear Corporation " LEA 132.90 175.59 121.30 Monro, Inc. NASDAQ MNRO 74.40 49.35 53.32 Motorcar Parts of America, Inc " MPAA 21.18 28.91 26.19 Navistar International Corp NYSE NAV 33.49 42.31 23.01 O'Reilly Automotive, Inc NASDAQ ORLY 320.75 210.95 264.24 Penske Automotive Group NYSE PAG 44.02 46.62 42.83 Rush Enterprises, Inc. NASDAQ RUSHB 35.95 47.59 24.77 Standard Motor Products, Inc NYSE SMP 53.90 43.67 46.88 Superior Industries International, Inc. " SUP 9.83 15.55 22.95 Tenneco, Inc. " TEN 34.43 58.11 56.06 US Auto Parts Network, Inc. NASDAQ PRTS 1.19 2.56 2.27 Veoneer, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Southeast Clean Energy Resource Team Strategic Energy Plan
    Southeast Clean Energy Resource Team Strategic Energy Plan CERTS PARTNERS: Minnesota Department of Commerce The Minnesota Project University of Minnesota Regional Sustainable Development Partnerships Rural Minnesota Energy Board Metropolitan Counties Energy Task Force Resource Conservation and Development Councils FUNDED BY: The Legislative Commission on Minnesota Resources from the U.S. Department of Energy Oil Overcharge Money The Carolyn Foundation The Blandin Foundation Minnesota Department of Commerce U.S. Department of Energy Community Assistantship Program, University of Minnesota, with financial sup- port from the Otto Bremer Foundation and Regional Sustainable Development Partnerships Program University of Minnesota Initiative for Renewable Energy and the Environment University of Minnesota Regional Sustainable Development Partnerships FINAL REPORT Energy Use, Renewable Energy Resources and Potential for Meeting the Energy Needs of the Fifteen Counties in SE/SC MN from Local Renewable Energy Resources and Energy Efficiency From the Citizens on the THE SE/SC CLEAN ENERGY RESOURCE TEAM Representing 15 Counties in SE/SC Minnesota: Blue Earth, Dodge, Faribault, Fillmore, Freeborn, Goodhue, Houston, Le Sueur, Mower, Olmsted, Rice, Steele, Wabasha, Waseca, Winona JUNE 2005 Dedicated to Dick Broeker, 1942 - 2004 The SE/SC Clean Energy Resource Team (CERT) dedicates this report to the memory of Dick Broeker. As Director of the Experiment in Rural Cooperation in SE Minnesota, Dick was involved in establishing the CERTs Project. When the Clean Energy Resources Teams were formed in regions around the state in December 2003, Dick was instrumental in organizing our team and helping us with our work through June 2004, when he retired. During this time, we completed a Strategic Plan to guide our work and an Inventory and Assessment of the people, infrastructure and resources in our area.
    [Show full text]
  • Rethinking Presidential Power—The Unitary Executive and the George W
    Rethinking Presidential Power—The Unitary Executive and the George W. Bush Presidency. Paper prepared for the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association April 7-10, 2005 Chicago, IL Christopher S. Kelley, Ph.D. Department of Political Science Miami University Oxford, OH [email protected] Abstract: Since the Nixon administration, modern presidents have had a difficult time relying upon the traditional powers of bargaining and persuading offered by the “Modern Presidency” theory of presidential power. As a result, presidents have relied on numerous unilateral actions in order to protect the prerogative of the office and to advance the president’s policy preferences by controlling the executive branch. The “unitary executive” theory offers such an explanation of presidential behavior that some regard as “imperial.” In this paper, I explain what the unitary executive theory is, how it has developed, and how the current Bush administration has fully embraced the theory in helping it govern since the very first day of office in 2001. I will focus on the use of signing statements, executive orders, and the OIRA to advance the administration’s objectives. Keywords: Unitary Executive, Signing Statements, Executive Orders, OMB, OIRA Dana Milbank, the former White House reporter for the “Washington Post,” wrote in an October 11, 2004 column profiling David Addington, Vice-President Cheney’s counsel, about an obscure theory of presidential power that permeated the Bush White House. The article described the detail to which Cheney and Addington had paid to preserving presidential power, from the now-famous “torture” memo to international law governing torture to withholding information about the energy task force formed in 2001 to deal with the country’s energy problem.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution of Sustainable Personal Vehicles
    The Evolution of Sustainable Personal Vehicles By BRYAN DALE JUNGERS B.S. (Humboldt State University) 2004 THESIS Submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE in Civil and Environmental Engineering in the OFFICE OF GRADUATE STUDIES of the UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS Approved: _________________________________(Chair) _____________________________________ _____________________________________ Committee in Charge 2009 - i - Abstract Through mechanisms of industrial globalization, modern societies are moving ever closer to capitalist ideals, emphasizing consumer choice and free competitive markets. Despite these ideals, relatively few choices currently exist for the typical personal vehicle consumer with respect to powertrain technology, fuel selection, and vehicle weight/size. This lack of market diversity is often blamed on the auto industry, the energy industry, the ignorant or fickle consumer, and/or the lack of long-term government support and financing of alternative technologies. Though each of these factors has certainly played a part in maintaining the status quo of a perpetually stagnant personal vehicle market, I will argue here that the existing problems associated with personal vehicles will be addressed most effectively by the fundamental reorientation of personal & institutional values. Such evolutionary shifts in perspective should be applied broadly by designers, engineers, business leaders, and government officials. I have explored several fundamental value shifts toward the evolution of sustainable personal vehicles. The personal vehicle serves as an apt metaphor for both the freedoms and follies of modern experience. By way of modeled examples, I define and evaluate the qualities of a sustainable personal vehicle and its infrastructure. Many of these concepts should also be applicable for other segments of the industrialized World.
    [Show full text]
  • Automotive Vehicle Powertrains and E-Mobility – the FUTURE
    PASSIONATE PEOPLE. GREAT IDEAS. YEARSYEARS A BETTER SKILLED AUSTRALIA. CELEBRATINGCELEBRATING Automotive Vehicle Powertrains and E-Mobility – THE FUTURE Ron Locandro 2014 Italian Services Institute of Australia An ISS Institute Fellowship sponsored by Italian Services Institute of Australia ISS Institute Inc MARCH 2015 © ISS Institute T 03 9347 4583 Level 1 F 03 9348 1474 189 Faraday Street [email protected] Carlton Vic E AUSTRALIA 3053 W www.issinstitute.org.au Published by International Specialised Skills Institute, Melbourne Extract published on www.issinstitute.org.au © Copyright ISS Institute March 2015 This publication is copyright. No part may be reproduced by any process except in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright Act 1968. Whilst this report has been accepted by ISS Institute, ISS Institute cannot provide expert peer review of the report, and except as may be required by law no responsibility can be accepted by ISS Institute for the content of the report or any links therein, or omissions, typographical, print or photographic errors, or inaccuracies that may occur after publication or otherwise. ISS Institute do not accept responsibility for the consequences of any action taken or omitted to be taken by any person as a consequence of anything contained in, or omitted from, this report. I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The purpose of this ISS Institute Fellowship was to undertake applied research and gain industry knowledge on innovations and changes in the automotive technologies aspects of vehicle alternative fuel powertrains and E-mobility in Germany, Netherlands and the USA. Industry training methodologies and knowledge underpinning automotive vehicle powertrains and E-mobility was also researched and the aim will be to distribute the findings to the Australian Automotive training industry such as (TAFE), Government and other stakeholders.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Intervenor-Defendant American Petroleum Institute's Objections And
    Case 6:15-cv-01517-TC Document 131-1 Filed 04/03/17 Page 1 of 37 C. Marie Eckert, OSB No. 883490 Marie.eckert@millernash Suzanne C. Lacampagne, OSB No. 951705 [email protected] MILLER NASH GRAHAM & DUNN LLP 3400 U.S. Bancorp Tower 111 S.W. Fifth Avenue Portland, Oregon 97204 Telephone: (503) 224-5858 Facsimile: (503) 224-0155 Frank R. Volpe [email protected] Benjamin E. Tannen [email protected] SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP 1501 K Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20005 Telephone: (202) 736-8000 Facsimile: (202) 736-8711 Attorneys for Intervenor-Defendants The National Association of Manufacturers, American Fuel & Petrochemical Manufacturers, and American Petroleum Institute UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON EUGENE DIVISION KELSEY CASCADIA ROSE JULIANA, et al., Case No. 6:15-cv-01517-TC Plaintiffs, INTERVENOR-DEFENDANT v. AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE’S OBJECTIONS AND UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., RESPONSES TO PLAINTIFFS’ REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF Defendants. DOCUMENTS __________________________________________ Intervenor-Defendant the American Petroleum Institute (“API”), pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 26 and 34, hereby respectfully submits the following Objections and 1 Intervenor-Defendant American Petroleum Institute’s Objections and Responses to Plaintiffs’ Request for Production of Documents Case 6:15-cv-01517-TC Document 131-1 Filed 04/03/17 Page 2 of 37 Responses to Plaintiffs’ Requests for Production of Documents to Intervenor-Defendant American Petroleum Institute (“Requests”), submitted February 17, 2017, and states as follows: GENERAL OBJECTIONS 1. API objects to the Requests to the extent that they seek information and documents which are not relevant to the claims or defenses of any party or proportional to the needs of the case, per Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(b)(1).
    [Show full text]
  • Status of State Electric Industry Restructuring Activity -- As of February 2003
    Status of State Electric Industry Restructuring Activity -- as of February 2003 -- (February 2003 was the last update. No further updates are currently planned) Status of State Retail Access Timeline (Click on a State below to see Restructuring Activity Customer Participation in Retail Access Current Restructuring Status) Table Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware District of Columbia Florida Georgia Hawaii Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska Nevada New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico New York North Carolina North Dakota Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Rhode Island South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virginia Washington West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming This site provides an overview of the status of electric industry restructuring in each state. Twenty-four states and the District of Columbia have either enacted enabling legislation or issued a regulatory order to implement retail access. The local distribution company continues to provide transmission and distribution (delivery of energy) services. Retail access allows customers to choose their own supplier of generation energy services, but each state's retail access schedule varies according to the legislative mandates or regulatory orders. The information in the “Status of State Electric Industry Restructuring Activity Map” was gathered from state public utility commissions, state legislatures, and utility company web pages. The state activity map is coded by color to indicate each state's restructuring progress. Purple colored states are active in the restructuring process, and these states have either enacted enabling legislation or issued a regulatory order to implement retail access. Retail access is either currently available to all or some customers or will soon be available.
    [Show full text]
  • Ocean Energy Task Force Final Report, 2009
    Final Report of the Ocean Energy Task Force to Governor John E. Baldacci December 2009 Photo credits (clockwise from top center): Solberg/Statoil; Maine Coastal Program; Ocean Renewable Power Company; Principle Power; Blue H. Center photo: Global Marine Systems, Ltd. Final Report of the Ocean Energy Task Force to Governor John E. Baldacci December 2009 Financial assistance for this document was provided by a grant from the Maine Coastal Program at the Maine State Planning Office, through funding provided by the U.S. Department of Commerce, Office of Ocean and Coastal Resource Management under the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972, as amended. Additional financial assistance was provided by the Efficiency Maine Trust (Efficiency Maine Trust is a statewide effort to promote the more efficient use of electricity, help Maine residents and businesses reduce energy costs, and improve Maine’s environment), and by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009. This publication was produced under appropriation number 020-07B-008205 Final Report of the Ocean Energy Task Force TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements.....................................................................................................................................ii Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................................iii Summary of Recommendations..............................................................................................................vii Overview
    [Show full text]
  • 03-475, Cheney V. United States Dist. Court for D. C
    Cite as: 541 U. S. ____ (2004) 1 Memorandum of SCALIA, J. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES RICHARD B. CHENEY, VICE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, ET AL. v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ET AL. ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT No. 03–475. Decided March 18, 2004. Memorandum of JUSTICE SCALIA. I have before me a motion to recuse in these cases con- solidated below. The motion is filed on behalf of respon- dent Sierra Club. The other private respondent, Judicial Watch, Inc., does not join the motion and has publicly stated that it “does not believe the presently-known facts about the hunting trip satisfy the legal standards requir- ing recusal.” Judicial Watch Statement 2 (Feb. 13, 2004) (available in Clerk of Court’s case file). (The District Court, a nominal party in this mandamus action, has of course made no appearance.) Since the cases have been consolidated, however, recusal in the one would entail recusal in the other. I The decision whether a judge’s impartiality can “‘reasonably be questioned’ ” is to be made in light of the facts as they existed, and not as they were surmised or reported. See Microsoft Corp. v. United States, 530 U. S. 1301, 1302 (2000) (REHNQUIST, C. J.) (opinion respecting recusal). The facts here were as follows: For five years or so, I have been going to Louisiana during the Court’s long December-January recess, to the duck-hunting camp of a friend whom I met through two hunting companions from Baton Rouge, one a dentist and 2 CHENEYv.
    [Show full text]
  • Development of a Hybrid Vehicle Control System
    Development of a Hybrid Vehicle Control System THESIS Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Margaret Jane Yatsko Graduate Program in Mechanical Engineering The Ohio State University 2016 Master's Examination Committee: Dr. Shawn Midlam-Mohler - Advisor Dr. Giorgio Rizzoni Copyright by Margaret Jane Yatsko 2016 ABSTRACT The EcoCAR 3 project is a four-year competition sponsored by General Motors and the U.S. Department of Energy challenging 16 university teams to reengineer a 2016 Chevrolet Camaro to be a performance hybrid electric vehicle. The Ohio State University designed a parallel hybrid electric vehicle with a 0 to 60 mph acceleration goal of 5.6 seconds and a 44 mile all electric range. Before the performance and emissions goals can be met the team must fully mechanically and electrically integrate their hybrid vehicle architecture. Concurrently to the vehicle integration, the controls team developed the basic vehicle controls that would be required to meet the goals for the second year of the competition. The controls development started with fully defining the vehicle controls requirements and then evaluating which requirements would be met in each part of the development process. The controls validation occurred using a team-developed vehicle model in both the Software- and Hardware-in-the-Loop environments. The main focus for this part of the development was defining and implementing the basic controls, such as controller communication and vehicle startup, which are critical to eventually having a fully functional vehicle. With the Year 2 controls validated in the HIL environment, a vehicle implementation plan was developed to be implemented and validated by May of 2016.
    [Show full text]
  • Australian Automotive Aftermarket Association
    Australian Automotive Aftermarket Association Australia’s Innovation System Submission to the Senate Standing Committee on Economics The Australian Automotive Aftermarket Association Ltd (AAAA) is the national industry association representing manufacturers, distributors, wholesalers, importers, mechanical repair & modification services and retailers of automotive parts and accessories, tools and equipment in Australia. The Association has over 1700 member companies in all categories of the Australian automotive aftermarket and includes major national and multi- national corporations as well as a large number of Australian owned small and medium size businesses. The parts and maintenance sector of the $108 billion Australian automotive industry represents about $34 billion. AAAA member companies employ more than 30,000 people and export over $800 million worth of product a year. Suite 16, Building 3, 195 Wellington Road Clayton, Victoria 3168 AUSTRALIA 03 9545 3333 www.aaaa.com.au About AAAA The Australian Automotive Aftermarket Association (AAAA) is the national industry association representing over 1700 manufacturers, distributors, wholesalers, importers, mechanical repair & modification services and retailers of automotive parts and accessories, tools and equipment in Australia. AAAA members manufacture motor vehicle components, including: Products used to modify, maintain or enhance the performance of vehicles, including modifications for rough terrain, speciality products, safety, comfort, appearance, functional performance and body components. Products that are replaced regularly throughout the life of the vehicle as a result of normal wear and tear – e.g. filters, tyres, wiper blades, batteries and brake pads. Many AAAA member companies that manufacture in Australia also supply locally manufactured Original Equipment (OE) components to car manufacturers as replacement parts and accessories for fitment to locally built and imported vehicles, as well as to the independent aftermarket.
    [Show full text]
  • Baker Institute Report
    Number 17 Feru bary 2002 BAKER INSTITUTE REPORT NOTES FROM THE JAMES A. BAKER III INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY OF RICE UNIVERSITY FORUM OF FORMER SECRETARIES OF THE TREASURY While emergency crews were deal- ing with the aftermath of the Sep- tember 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, the U.S. secretary of the treasury had to deal with a critical related problem: the potential impact that the loss of the World Trade Center might have on the economy. At Rice University’s Baker Insti- tute on October 5, eight former secretaries of the treasury ex- From left: Rice ambassadors Mahek Shah and Kevin Bailey gather with Wall Street Journal editorial page editor Paul Gigot, former treasury secretaries James A. Baker, III, Michael Blumenthal, Nicholas Brady, plained the multiple challenges William Miller, Lloyd Bentsen, Jr., ABC News veteran Sam Donaldson, former treasury secretaries Donald faced by the current treasury sec- Regan, George Shultz, and Robert Rubin, and Rice ambassadors Mathias Ricken and Renata Escovar at the forum on the role of the secretary of the treasury. retary, Paul O’Neill. They were participating in a forum on the “Our current secretary first had marker of what the secretary does, role of the secretary of the trea- to figure out how to get back from Shultz noted that in addition to sury, which was co-hosted by the Japan,” said George Shultz, who having “immense domestic re- Baker Institute and the Woodrow served President Nixon as the sponsibilities,” the treasury secre- Wilson International Center for 62nd secretary of the treasury. Cit- tary also has “tremendous interac- Scholars, Washington, D.C.
    [Show full text]