DOCSLIB.ORG

Southeast Clean Energy Resource Team Strategic Energy Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Southeast Clean Energy Resource Team Strategic Energy Plan CERTS PARTNERS: Minnesota Department of Commerce The Minnesota Project University of Minnesota Regional Sustainable Development Partnerships Rural Minnesota Energy Board Metropolitan Counties Energy Task Force Resource Conservation and Development Councils FUNDED BY: The Legislative Commission on Minnesota Resources from the U.S. Department of Energy Oil Overcharge Money The Carolyn Foundation The Blandin Foundation Minnesota Department of Commerce U.S. Department of Energy Community Assistantship Program, University of Minnesota, with financial sup- port from the Otto Bremer Foundation and Regional Sustainable Development Partnerships Program University of Minnesota Initiative for Renewable Energy and the Environment University of Minnesota Regional Sustainable Development Partnerships FINAL REPORT Energy Use, Renewable Energy Resources and Potential for Meeting the Energy Needs of the Fifteen Counties in SE/SC MN from Local Renewable Energy Resources and Energy Efficiency From the Citizens on the THE SE/SC CLEAN ENERGY RESOURCE TEAM Representing 15 Counties in SE/SC Minnesota: Blue Earth, Dodge, Faribault, Fillmore, Freeborn, Goodhue, Houston, Le Sueur, Mower, Olmsted, Rice, Steele, Wabasha, Waseca, Winona JUNE 2005 Dedicated to Dick Broeker, 1942 - 2004 The SE/SC Clean Energy Resource Team (CERT) dedicates this report to the memory of Dick Broeker. As Director of the Experiment in Rural Cooperation in SE Minnesota, Dick was involved in establishing the CERTs Project. When the Clean Energy Resources Teams were formed in regions around the state in December 2003, Dick was instrumental in organizing our team and helping us with our work through June 2004, when he retired. During this time, we completed a Strategic Plan to guide our work and an Inventory and Assessment of the people, infrastructure and resources in our area. Dick was our friend, mentor and cheerleader. He believed strongly that individuals could make a difference and that citizens working together in new public and private partnerships could make the world a better place. He helped us in myriad ways -- by connecting us with technical experts, finding resources for us and helping us think through and articulate complex issues. Most importantly, Dick had great faith that we -- ordinary citizens in SE/SC Minnesota - - could design a clean renewable energy plan for our region and then shape an energy future based on that plan. Because he believed in us, we believed in ourselves. We’ve done -- and will do -- our best to live up to his vision. This report is part of Dick’s legacy, which will continue on as we use it to shape our work and create the clean renewable energy future for our region that we envisioned at the start of our journey together in December 2003. June 2005 2 PREFACE “The thing to do with the future is not to forecast it, but to create it. The objective of planning should be to design a desirable future and to invent ways of bringing it about.” -Russele Achoff We believe it is essential for citizens of the state to be involved in the decisions being made about our energy future and the type of energy future we want. Energy impacts every aspect of our lives; those decisions shouldn’t be left to technical experts, politicians, government officials and/or executives at the power companies. Section 1 defines the type of clean, renewable energy future we want for our area. This includes an articulation of the values and principles that serve as the foundation or underpinnings of the type of energy future and energy system we want – one that is clean, renewable, affordable, reliable and safe. The rest of the report sets out to accomplish five things: (1) provide information about the Clean Energy Resource Team Project and our SE/SC CERT; (2) paint a broad picture of the people, resources and infrastructure in our 15 counties in SE/SC Minnesota – things such as land use, how many people there are, where they are living, how they are moving about and the major economic activities they are engaged in; (3) describe briefly what energy is, how we use energy in different forms and amounts, where different sources of energy comes from and future prospects for their availability, the health and environmental impacts resulting from using different types of energy, external costs and subsidies masking the true costs of using different types of energy; (4) identify and assess the renewable energy resources in the region and the potential for saving energy and replacing conventional fuels with energy produced from those local renewable resources; and (5) identify barriers to implementing renewable energy projects in our region. Hopefully this information will serve as a road map for designing and implementing a clean, renewable energy future for our region, our counties and our communities. When we started this project, we weren’t sure if we would be able to meet our energy needs in different forms from local renewable energy resources and using energy more wisely. We are now confident that we can do so and export energy to other regions. The question becomes do we have the June 2005 3 political will and fortitude to make it happen for our children and our grandchildren. There are different reasons why members of our Clean Energy Resource Team support clean renewable energy and using energy more wisely. Some of us are interested in the good jobs and economic development benefits that accompany locating renewable energy and energy efficiency projects throughout our area. We estimate that well over a billion and a half dollars are leaving our area every year to import energy. By developing renewable energy projects within our area to meet our energy needs, we could keep those dollars at home. Some of us are farmers who want to earn more income from having wind generators on our farms and adding value to our commodities. Some of us are environmentalists concerned about global warming, mercury pollution and acid rain. Most of us are parents and grandparents concerned about what the future holds for our children and grandchildren. The beauty of renewable energy is that it has something for everyone – Republicans and Democrats, liberals and conservatives, farmers and city dwellers, young and old, environmentalists and business people. Renewable energy makes good sense for everyone and good dollars and cents for our region. So if you read something in this paper that you don’t agree with, please keep reading. You don’t have to believe in global warming or be an environmentalist to support renewable energy. Renewable energy has something for everyone. We decided not to assess the potential of renewable technologies that are on the horizon, such as fuel cells, producing ethanol from cellulose, hydrogen. We think that producing ethanol from cellulose and being able to charge fuel cells from locally- produced biogas hold great potential for our future. We are also interested in progress being made to extract hydrogen from water using wind-powered electrolysis for local and regional use. However, we do not think it is wise to be producing hydrogen from nonrenewable fuels, such as natural gas, other fossil fuels or nuclear power. We hope the reader will keep in mind that this report was prepared by citizen volunteers, who took time from their regular busy lives over the course of a year and a half to prepare it and be part of designing and creating a clean renewable energy future for the 15 counties in SE/SC Minnesota. It is broad sweeping and was not meant to be highly technical or comprehensive or provide in-depth information about renewable energy technologies or energy efficiency programs that the reader could easily find elsewhere. We regret any errors. June 2005 4 Acknowledgements Many individuals and organizations have supported our efforts and contributed to this report’s content and preparation. We thank them and anyone we may have inadvertently forgotten. Individuals we want to thank include Dick Broeker, Director of the Experiment in Rural Cooperation (the SE MN Regional Sustainable Development Partnership) through June 2004; Erin Tegtmeier, Director of the Experiment in Rural Cooperation (the SE MN Regional Sustainable Development Partnership) beginning July 2004; Joel Haskard, CERT Assistant Coordinator; Shannon Drake, our research assistant extraordinaire; David Morris and John Bailey from the Institute for Local Self Reliance for advising us on myriad topics throughout the project; Lola Schoenrich, Amanda Bilek, and Mark Lindquist from the Minnesota Project; Jamie Schultz for doing GIS work; Mike Michaud, Jeff Cook-Coyle, and Lee Dilley for their wind assessments; Douglas Tiffany from the University of Minnesota for his agriculture/energy use information; Rich Huelskamp for his assessment of conservation potential; Charles Peterson from the PCA for help in obtaining information about waste water treatment plants, biosolids, and feedlots for the potential biogas assessment; Jeff Cook-Coyle for his outline of the barriers issues and economic development potential for wind development in our region; Mike Michaud for helping identify barriers and working on how we might remove barriers we have identified; Carol Overland and Kristen Eide-Tollefson for their help in understanding transmission line issues; Ward Lutz for his help on the energy used in transportation in our region and the definitions of energy conservation and energy productivity; and Norm Erickson for all his comments and contributions. We want to give special thanks to Nancy Adams, who chaired the SE/SC Clean Energy Resource Team with dedication and enthusiasm and wrote this report, and to Melissa Pawlisch, the statewide CERT coordinator, who has worked tirelessly on our behalf and helped identify, gather and assess important information, connected us with technical experts and resources, and cheered us on when we were overwhelmed with the enormity and complexity of the task at hand.
Recommended publications
  • Rethinking Presidential Power—The Unitary Executive and the George W

    Rethinking Presidential Power—The Unitary Executive and the George W

    Rethinking Presidential Power—The Unitary Executive and the George W. Bush Presidency. Paper prepared for the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association April 7-10, 2005 Chicago, IL Christopher S. Kelley, Ph.D. Department of Political Science Miami University Oxford, OH [email protected] Abstract: Since the Nixon administration, modern presidents have had a difficult time relying upon the traditional powers of bargaining and persuading offered by the “Modern Presidency” theory of presidential power. As a result, presidents have relied on numerous unilateral actions in order to protect the prerogative of the office and to advance the president’s policy preferences by controlling the executive branch. The “unitary executive” theory offers such an explanation of presidential behavior that some regard as “imperial.” In this paper, I explain what the unitary executive theory is, how it has developed, and how the current Bush administration has fully embraced the theory in helping it govern since the very first day of office in 2001. I will focus on the use of signing statements, executive orders, and the OIRA to advance the administration’s objectives. Keywords: Unitary Executive, Signing Statements, Executive Orders, OMB, OIRA Dana Milbank, the former White House reporter for the “Washington Post,” wrote in an October 11, 2004 column profiling David Addington, Vice-President Cheney’s counsel, about an obscure theory of presidential power that permeated the Bush White House. The article described the detail to which Cheney and Addington had paid to preserving presidential power, from the now-famous “torture” memo to international law governing torture to withholding information about the energy task force formed in 2001 to deal with the country’s energy problem.
  • 2014 - Issue 3 When You’Re on the Job, It’S Important to Have the Right Tools

    2014 - Issue 3 When You’Re on the Job, It’S Important to Have the Right Tools

    2014 - ISSUE 3 WHEN YOU’RE ON THE JOB, IT’S IMPORTANT TO HAVE THE RIGHT TOOLS. Anchor Checking. ■ Free worldwide ATMs* ■ Free iPhone® and Android® apps Only from ■ Free online banking, mobile ■ Free domestic incoming wires and Camden National Bank. banking and bill pay cashier’s checks — and more! Wherever you are in the world, you can count on Camden National Bank every step of the way. Visit one of our 44 branches statewide or online at CamdenNational.com to open your account today. *Unlimited refunds when using a non-Camden National Bank ATM in the United States per withdrawal. Accept the disclosure fee and we will refund the surcharge. For ATM transactions outside the United States, Puerto Rico, or U.S. Virgin Islands, we will refund the ATM fee if you bring in the ATM receipt showing the surcharge within 90 days of the transaction. CNBRB_MMAAnchorCheckingAd_PRINT_110714.indd 1 11/7/14 3:10 PM Content MARINER STAFF IN THIS ISSUE Director of College Relations Jennifer DeJoy / [email protected] 26 Editor Laurie Stone / [email protected] Designer & Production Editor Deanna Yocom / [email protected] Ad Representative Deanna Yocom / [email protected] AdministratiON President Dr. William J. Brennan Provost & V. P. for Academic Affairs Meet Emily Wyman ’17. Photo by D Sinclair. Dr. David M. Gardner V. P. for Enrollment Management Dr. Elizabeth True FEatURES V.P. for Operations Dr. Darrell W. Donahue 8 Money:Top Rankings Chief Financial Officer 18 Above & Beyond James Soucie WHEN YOU’RE ON THE JOB, IT’S IMPORTANT TO HAVE THE RIGHT TOOLS.
  • Received by NSD/FARA Registration Unit 06/19/2012 10:03:03 PM OMB NO, 1124-0002; Expires February 28, 2014 U.S

    Received by NSD/FARA Registration Unit 06/19/2012 10:03:03 PM OMB NO, 1124-0002; Expires February 28, 2014 U.S

    Received by NSD/FARA Registration Unit 06/19/2012 10:03:03 PM OMB NO, 1124-0002; Expires February 28, 2014 U.S. Department of Justice Supplemental Statement Washington, DC 20530 Pursuant to the Foreign Agents Registration Act of 1938, as amended For Six Month Period Ending 05/31/2012 (Insert date) I - REGISTRANT 1. (a) Name of Registrant (b) Registration No. Nurnberger & Associatesjnc. 5809 (c) Business Address(es) of Registrant 4870-F Old Dominion Drive Arlington, VA 22207 2. Has there been a change in the information previously furnished in connection with the following? (a) If an individual: (1) Residence address(es) YesD NoD (2) Citizenship YesD NoD (3) Occupation YesD NoD (b) If an organization: (1) Name . YesD No ED (2) Ownership or control YesD No __. (3) Branch offices YesD No H (c) Explain fully all changes, if any, indicated in Items (a) and (b) above. IF THE REGISTRANT IS AN INDIVIDUAL, OMIT RESPONSE TO ITEMS 3, 4, AND 5(a). 3. If you have previously filed Exhibit C1, state whether any changes therein have occurred during this 6 month reporting period. Yes • NoB ' . N • If yes, have you filed an amendment to the Exhibit C? Yes • No • If no, please attach the required amendment. The Exhibit C, for which no printed form is provided, consists of a true copy ofthe charter, articles of incorporation, association, and by laws of a registrant that is an organization. (A waiver ofthe requirement to file an Exhibit C may be obtained for good cause upon written application to the Assistant Attorney General, National Security Division, U.S.
  • State of Maine Energy Assurance & Emergency Management Plan

    State of Maine Energy Assurance & Emergency Management Plan

    State of Maine Energy Assurance and Emergency Management Plan ____________________________________________________ _ Series: v2.0.2011.03.21 State of Maine: Proprietary Information S TATE OF M AINE O FFICE OF THE G OVERNOR 22 S TATE H OUSE S TATION A UGUSTA, M AINE 04333-0001 PAUL R. LEPAGE KENNETH C. FLETCHER GOVERNOR DIRECTOR OFFICE OF ENERGY INDEPENDENCE AND SECURITY March 2011 Honorable, Governor Paul R. LePage State of Maine Office of the Governor 1 State House Station Augusta, Maine 04333-0001 RE: State of Maine Energy Assurance and Emergency Management Plan Dear Governor LePage: The Governor’s Office of Energy Independence and Security (OEIS) is responsible for developing and revising the State of Maine Energy Assurance and Emergency Management Plan. The purpose of the Energy Assurance Plan is to provide the Governor, the Legislature, the Executive Departments, the energy industry and the general public with a clear, concise and comprehensive blueprint and strategy to address a potential or actual energy emergency caused by a supply disruption, a rapid and unsustainable increase in energy prices or other energy emergency situation. The OEIS created Maine’s first energy emergency plan in 2008 in response to Maine citizens’ increasing vulnerability to rapid price escalations, fossil fuel supply curtailments and infrastructure disruptions. The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) provided states with an opportunity to revise the plan to build greater capacity and resiliency for energy assurance and emergency planning and response. The State of Maine Energy Assurance and Emergency Management Plan is designed to be a living document that will be presented to the U.S.
  • MLGPA News (Fall 2002)

    MLGPA News (Fall 2002)

    University of Southern Maine USM Digital Commons MLGPA News Periodicals Fall 2002 MLGPA News (Fall 2002) Maggie Allen Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.usm.maine.edu/mlgpa_news Part of the American Politics Commons, American Studies Commons, and the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Studies Commons Recommended Citation Allen, Maggie, "MLGPA News (Fall 2002)" (2002). MLGPA News. 46. https://digitalcommons.usm.maine.edu/mlgpa_news/46 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the Periodicals at USM Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in MLGPA News by an authorized administrator of USM Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. MLGPA News FALL 2002 Advocacy for the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Communities since 1984 PO Box 1951, Portland, ME 04104 • 207-761-3732 • [email protected] • www.mlgpa.com MLGPA Endorses 2002 Campaigns n an open endorsement meeting in August, MLGPA members discussed candidates' Iqualifications and voting records before making key endorsements in the 2002 elec­ tions. Endorsements were made in the races for U.S. Senate, U.S. Representative, Mark your Governor, and State Legislature. MLGPA members endorsed John Baldacci for governor, Chellie Pingree for U.S. calendars for Senate, Tom Allen for U.S. Congress (1st District), and Mike Michaud for U.S. Congress (2nd District). the Great At the state level, members endorsed 14 candidates for Senate and 66 for House Pumpkin Ball. of Representatives. D = Democrat R = Republican G = Green Party October 26 United States Senate: 8:00 pm Chellie Pingree (D) Chellie Pingree is unwavering in her support of protecting civil rights.
  • Portland Press Herald Poll #3

    Portland Press Herald Poll #3

    PORTLAND PRESS HERALD POLL #3 MAINE 2014 GENERAL ELECTION Prepared by: Andrew E. Smith, Ph.D. Zachary S. Azem, M.A. The Survey Center University of New Hampshire October, 2014 Contents Technical Report .......................................................................... 1 Questionnaire .............................................................................. 2 Data Tables ................................................................................ 21 Portland Press Herald Poll #3 Maine 2014 General Election Conducted by the UNH Survey Center October 2014 Technical Report Field Period: October 15 to October 21, 2014 Hours: 9 a.m. to 9 p.m. Median Completion Time: 14 minutes Sample Size: 734 randomly selected Maine adults (RDD) 667 randomly selected Maine likely and early voters in the 2014 General Election (RDD) Sampling Error: +/- 3.6% (all respondents) +/- 3.8% (likely voters) Congressional Subsections: 348 likely voters in the 1st Congressional District (5.3% MOE) 320 likely voters in the 2nd Congressional District (5.5% MOE) Response Rate (AAPOR #4): 24% The data have been weighted by the number of adults in a household and the number of telephone numbers at which a household can be reached in order to equalize the chances of an individual Maine adult being selected. The data have also been weighted by the sex, age and the region of the state based on the American Community Survey conducted by the US Census. 1 Portland Press Herald Poll #3 Conducted by the UNH Survey Center Fall, 2014 INTRO: “Good evening / afternoon.
  • GMP Exhibits Ware at Detroit

    GMP Exhibits Ware at Detroit

    GMP Exhibits Ware at Detroit Notice of Nominations and Elections appear on page 9 Volume 58 June 2008 Number 6 An offi cial publication of The Glass, Molders, Pottery, Plastics & Allied Workers, AFL-CIO, CLC U.S.P.S. No. 215-300 Glass, Molders, Pottery, Plastics & Allied Workers, AFL-CIO, CLC JOHN P. RYAN 608 East Baltimore Pike, P.O. Box 607, Media, Pa. 19063 International President Copyright 2008 by Glass, Molders, Pottery, Plastics & Allied Workers, AFL-CIO, CLC. BRUCE R. SMITH All rights reserved. No part of this periodical may be reproduced without International Secretary-Treasurer the written consent of the Glass, Molders, Pottery, Plastics & Allied Workers. WALTER THORN Vice President PRINTED IN U.S.A. WESLEY ROYSTER Area Director In this Issue: P.O. Box 1978 608 East Baltimore Pike In his Message on page 1, International President Ryan points out the labor- Media, PA 19063 friendly positions of the presumptive Democratic Presidential candidate, Senator FRANK J. BRANDAO, SR. Barack Obama. Vice President P.O. Box 1978 The GMP demonstrated pottery-making skills at the 2008 America @ Work show in 608 E. Baltimore Pike Detroit. See page 2. Media PA 19063 A member of Local 50 in Seattle, Washington, received a Lifeline Trust grant from IGNACIO DE LA FUENTE Union Plus. See page 4. Vice President P.O. Box 1978 608 E. Baltimore Pike Staff Media PA 19063 DAVID DOYLE RICHARD KLINE FRANK GROTTI Vice President Director of Communications Director of Research and Education P.O. Box 20133 Woodstock, Ontario N4S 8X8 Canada FRED NEIBAUER, CPA BRENDA SCOTLAND Controller Director of Organizing EXECUTIVE OFFICERS RUSSELL BABCOCK Published monthly at 4801 Viewpoint Place, Cheverly, Md.
  • 1 Intervenor-Defendant American Petroleum Institute's Objections And

    1 Intervenor-Defendant American Petroleum Institute's Objections And

    Case 6:15-cv-01517-TC Document 131-1 Filed 04/03/17 Page 1 of 37 C. Marie Eckert, OSB No. 883490 Marie.eckert@millernash Suzanne C. Lacampagne, OSB No. 951705 [email protected] MILLER NASH GRAHAM & DUNN LLP 3400 U.S. Bancorp Tower 111 S.W. Fifth Avenue Portland, Oregon 97204 Telephone: (503) 224-5858 Facsimile: (503) 224-0155 Frank R. Volpe [email protected] Benjamin E. Tannen [email protected] SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP 1501 K Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20005 Telephone: (202) 736-8000 Facsimile: (202) 736-8711 Attorneys for Intervenor-Defendants The National Association of Manufacturers, American Fuel & Petrochemical Manufacturers, and American Petroleum Institute UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON EUGENE DIVISION KELSEY CASCADIA ROSE JULIANA, et al., Case No. 6:15-cv-01517-TC Plaintiffs, INTERVENOR-DEFENDANT v. AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE’S OBJECTIONS AND UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., RESPONSES TO PLAINTIFFS’ REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF Defendants. DOCUMENTS __________________________________________ Intervenor-Defendant the American Petroleum Institute (“API”), pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 26 and 34, hereby respectfully submits the following Objections and 1 Intervenor-Defendant American Petroleum Institute’s Objections and Responses to Plaintiffs’ Request for Production of Documents Case 6:15-cv-01517-TC Document 131-1 Filed 04/03/17 Page 2 of 37 Responses to Plaintiffs’ Requests for Production of Documents to Intervenor-Defendant American Petroleum Institute (“Requests”), submitted February 17, 2017, and states as follows: GENERAL OBJECTIONS 1. API objects to the Requests to the extent that they seek information and documents which are not relevant to the claims or defenses of any party or proportional to the needs of the case, per Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(b)(1).
  • Congress to Combat Fatigue.Indd

    Congress to Combat Fatigue.Indd

    Who’s on Our Side in Congress in the Effort to Combat Fatigue? he 145 Representatives (132 Democrats and 13 Republicans) listed below signed a letter request- ing funding for a detailed study of the causes and effects of flight attendant fatigue. The goal: Tproving to the FAA that minimum rest periods must be changed. If your member is on the list, please take the time to thank them. When the next election comes around, remember who was on the side of flight attendants in the effort to fight flight attendant fatigue. Arizona Colorado Rahm Emanuel (D) Raul Grijalva (D) Diana DeGette (D) Lane Evans (D) John Salazar (D) Luis Gutierrez (D) California Mark Udall (D) Timothy Johnson (R) Joe Baca (D) Daniel Lipinski (D) Xavier Becerra (D) Connecticut Donald Manzullo (R) Lois Capps (D) Chris Shays (R) Bobby Rush (D) Dennis Cardoza (D) Rob Simmons (R) Jan Schakowsky (D) Susan Davis (D) Anna Eshoo (D) District of Columbia Indiana Bob Filner (D) Eleanor Holmes Norton (D) Julia Carson (D) Jane Harman (D) Mike Honda (D) Florida Iowa Tom Lantos (D) Corrine Brown (D) Leonard Boswell (D) Barbara Lee (D) Alcee Hastings (D) Zoe Lofgren (D) Kendrick Meek (D) Kentucky Juanita Millender-McDonald (D) Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D) Ben Chandler (D) George Miller (D) Grace Napolitano (D) Georgia Maryland Lucille Roybal-Allard (D) John Barrow (D) Ben Cardin (D) Linda Sanchez (D) Cynthia McKinney (D) Chris Van Hollen (D) Loretta Sanchez (D) David Scott (D) Adam Schiff (D) Maine Brad Sherman (D) Hawaii Tom Allen (D) Hilda Solis (D) Neil Abercrombie (D) Mike Michaud
  • Maine State Legislature

    Maine State Legislature

    MAINE STATE LEGISLATURE The following document is provided by the LAW AND LEGISLATIVE DIGITAL LIBRARY at the Maine State Law and Legislative Reference Library http://legislature.maine.gov/lawlib Reproduced from electronic originals (may include minor formatting differences from printed original) STATE OF MAINE 124th LEGISLATURE FIRST REGULAR SESSION Sixth Annual Report of the Citizen Trade Policy Commission October 2010 Voting Members Sen. Troy Jackson, Co-Chair Ms. Sarah Bigney Ren..._ Man!aret0 Rotundo.J Co-Chair-- Ms. Carla Dickstein Sen. Stan Gerzofsky Mr. Michael Herz Sen. Roger Sherman Mr. l\r1ichael Hiltz Rep. Jeffery Gifford Mr. John Palmer Rep. Sharon Treat Mr. John Patrick Ms. Cynthia Phinney Ms. Linda Pistner Mr. Paul Volckhausen Mr. Joseph Woodbury Staff Advisory Members Curtis Bentley, Legislative Analyst Natalie Haynes, Legislative Analyst Mr. Wade Merritt Office of Policy & Legal Analysis Mr. Malcolm Burson Maine Legislature Ms. Jane Aiudi (207) 287-1670 Mr. Michael Roland http://www.state.me.us/legis/opla Ms. Barbara Van Burgel Table of Contents Page Executive Summary ................................................................................ i I. Introduction ........................................................................................................... 1 II. Meetings ................................................................................................................. 1 III. Public Hearings ....................................................................................................
  • Status of State Electric Industry Restructuring Activity -- As of February 2003

    Status of State Electric Industry Restructuring Activity -- As of February 2003

    Status of State Electric Industry Restructuring Activity -- as of February 2003 -- (February 2003 was the last update. No further updates are currently planned) Status of State Retail Access Timeline (Click on a State below to see Restructuring Activity Customer Participation in Retail Access Current Restructuring Status) Table Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware District of Columbia Florida Georgia Hawaii Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska Nevada New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico New York North Carolina North Dakota Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Rhode Island South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virginia Washington West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming This site provides an overview of the status of electric industry restructuring in each state. Twenty-four states and the District of Columbia have either enacted enabling legislation or issued a regulatory order to implement retail access. The local distribution company continues to provide transmission and distribution (delivery of energy) services. Retail access allows customers to choose their own supplier of generation energy services, but each state's retail access schedule varies according to the legislative mandates or regulatory orders. The information in the “Status of State Electric Industry Restructuring Activity Map” was gathered from state public utility commissions, state legislatures, and utility company web pages. The state activity map is coded by color to indicate each state's restructuring progress. Purple colored states are active in the restructuring process, and these states have either enacted enabling legislation or issued a regulatory order to implement retail access. Retail access is either currently available to all or some customers or will soon be available.
  • Why Only the Rich Run for Office

    Why Only the Rich Run for Office

    © Copyright, Princeton University Press. No part of this book may be distributed, posted, or reproduced in any form by digital or mechanical means without prior written permission of the publisher. 1 GOVERNMENT BY THE PRIVILEGED In 2014, something historically unprecedented almost happened in the state of Maine. Representative Mike Michaud— who had been a factory worker when he was first elected to public office—announce d that he was retiring from the House of Representatives to run for governor. Soon after, a state senator named Troy Jackson launched a campaign to fill Michaud’s House seat. Jackson seemed like a natural choice: like Michaud, he was a Democrat, he had served in the state legislature, and he was endorsed by many of the state’s major progressive organizations. Jackson was even a blue-collar worker: when the state legislature wasn’t in session, he worked full- time as a logger upstate. And that’s what would have made the election historic. If Jackson had won, he would have become the first blue-collar worker in American his- tory to succeed another former blue- collar worker in the same congres- sional seat. From 1789 to the present day, seats in the House of Represen- tatives have changed hands more than fourteen thousand times. Former lawyers have taken over for other former lawyers. Former business owners have succeeded other former business owners. But two former blue-collar workers have never served in the same U.S. House seat back- to-bac k. Despite Troy Jackson’s best efforts, however, that record still stood after the 2014 election.