DOCSLIB.ORG

Chapter 5 Cropland

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Chapter 5 Cropland Chapter 5: Clopland CHAPTER 5 CROPLAND 2019 Refinement to the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories 5.1 Volume 4: Agriculture, Forestry and Other Land Use Authors 1 Stephen Michael Ogle (USA), Stephen John Wakelin (New Zealand), Leandro Buendia (Philippines), Brian McConkey (Canada), Jeffrey Baldock (Australia), Hiroko Akiyama (Japan), Ayaka W. Mo Kishimoto (Japan), Ngonidzashe Chirinda (CGIAR, Zimbabwe), Martial Bernoux (FAO), Sumana Bhattacharya (India), Nares Chuersuwan (Thailand), Muhammad Arif Rashid Goheer (Pakistan), Kristell Hergoualc’h (France), Shigehiro Ishizuka (Japan), Rodel Diaz Lasco (Philippines), Xuebiao Pan (China), Himanshu Pathak (India), Kristiina Regina (Finland), Atsushi Sato (Japan), Gabriel Vazquez-Amabile (Argentina), Changke Wang (China), Xunhua Zheng (China). Contributing Authors Cody Alsaker (USA), Rémi Cardinael (France), Marife D. Corre (Germany), Ram Gurung (USA), Akinori Mori (Japan), Johannes Lehmann (USA), Simone Rossi (Italy), Oliver van Straaten (Germany), Edzo Veldkamp (Netherlands), Dominic Woolf (USA), Kazuyuki Yagi (Japan), Xiaoyuan Yan (China) 1 Biomass Carbon Sections were prepared by lead authors, S.J. Wakelin, A. Sato, and R.D. Lasco; and contributing authors R. Cardinael, S. Rossi. Soil Carbon Sections were prepared by lead authors, S.M. Ogle, B. McConkey, J. Baldock, A. Mo Kishimoto, N. Chirinda, M. Bernoux, K. Hergoualc’h, S. Ishizuka, X. Pan, K. Regina, G. Vazquez-Amabile, C. Wang; and contributing authors, C. Alsaker, M.D. Corre, R. Gurung, J. Lehmann, A. Mori, O. van Straaten, E. Veldkamp, D. Woolf. Rice Cultivation Section was prepared by lead authors, L. Buendia, H. Akiyama, S. Bhattacharya, N. Chuersuwan, M.A.R. Goheer, H. Pathak, X. Zheng, S.M. Ogle; and contributing authors, K. Yagi,X. Yan. 5.2 2019 Refinement to the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Chapter 5: Clopland Contents Cropland ................................................................................................................................................... 5.6 5.1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 5.6 5.2 Cropland Remaining Cropland ............................................................................................................. 5.6 5.2.1 Biomass ..................................................................................................................................... 5.6 5.2.1.1 Choice of methods ........................................................................................................ 5.6 5.2.1.2 Choice of emission factors ............................................................................................ 5.7 5.2.1.3 Choice of activity data ................................................................................................ 5.13 5.2.1.4 Calculation steps for Tier 1 and Tier 2 ....................................................................... 5.14 5.2.1.5 Uncertainty assessment ............................................................................................... 5.14 5.2.2 Dead organic matter ................................................................................................................ 5.14 5.2.3 Soil carbon .............................................................................................................................. 5.14 5.2.3.1 Choice of method ........................................................................................................ 5.15 5.2.3.2 Choice of stock change and emission factors ............................................................. 5.26 5.2.3.3 Choice of activity data ................................................................................................ 5.33 5.2.3.4 Calculation steps for Tier 1 ......................................................................................... 5.37 5.2.3.5 Uncertainty assessment ............................................................................................... 5.38 5.2.4 Non-CO2 greenhouse gas emissions from biomass burning ................................................... 5.38 5.3 Land Converted to Cropland .............................................................................................................. 5.39 5.3.1 Biomass ................................................................................................................................... 5.39 5.3.1.1 Choice of method ........................................................................................................ 5.39 5.3.1.2 Choice of emission factors .......................................................................................... 5.41 5.3.1.3 Choice of activity data ................................................................................................ 5.42 5.3.1.4 Calculation steps for Tier 1 and Tier 2 ....................................................................... 5.43 5.3.1.5 Uncertainty assessment ............................................................................................... 5.43 5.3.2 Dead organic matter ................................................................................................................ 5.43 5.3.3 Soil carbon .............................................................................................................................. 5.43 5.3.3.1 Choice of method ........................................................................................................ 5.43 5.3.3.2 Choice of stock change and emission factors ............................................................. 5.44 5.3.3.3 Choice of activity data ................................................................................................ 5.46 5.3.3.4 Calculation steps for Tier 1 ......................................................................................... 5.47 5.3.3.5 Uncertainty assessment ............................................................................................... 5.48 5.3.4 Non-CO2 greenhouse gas emissions from biomass burning ................................................... 5.48 5.4 Completeness, Time series, QA/QC, and Reporting .......................................................................... 5.48 5.5 Methane Emissions from Rice Cultivation......................................................................................... 5.49 5.5.1 Choice of method .................................................................................................................... 5.49 5.5.2 Choice of emission and scaling factors ................................................................................... 5.52 5.5.3 Choice of activity data ............................................................................................................ 5.57 5.5.4 Example Calculation for Tier 1 ............................................................................................... 5.58 2019 Refinement to the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories 5.3 Volume 4: Agriculture, Forestry and Other Land Use Annex 5A.1 Estimation of default stock change factors for mineral soil C emissions/removals for cropland ................................................................................................................ 5.61 Annex 5A.2 Background for developing emission factors and scaling factors for methane emission from paddy field, using scientific literature ........................................... 5.63 Annex 5A.3 Parameterisation of the Tier 2 – Steady State Method for Mineral Soils .............. 5.67 References .......................................................................................................................................................... 5.70 Equations Equation 5.0a (New) Annual Change in Soil C Stock for Mineral Soils using the Steady State Method 5.18 Equation 5.0b (New) Active Sub-Pool Soil C Stock For Mineral Soils using the Steady-State Method 5.19 Equation 5.0c (New) Slow Sub-Pool Soil C Stock for Mineral Soils using the Steady-State Method ... 5.20 Equation 5.0d (New) Passive Sub-Pool Soil C Stock for Mineral Soils using the Steady-State Method 5.21 Equation 5.0e (New) Temperature Effect on Decomposition for Mineral Soils using the Steady-State Method .................................................................................................................. 5.22 Equation 5.0f (New) Water Effect on Decomposition for Mineral Soils using the Steady-State Method .............................................................................................................................. 5.22 Equation 5.0g (New) C Input to the Active Soil C Sub-Pool for Mineral Soils using the Steady-State Method .................................................................................................................. 5.23 Equation 5.0h (New) Cropland C- input to soil for the Steady-State Method ......................................... 5.36 Equation 5.1 CH4 emissions from rice cultivation ..................................................................... 5.49 Equation 5.2 (Updated) Adjusted daily emission factor (Tier 1)................................................................. 5.51 Equation 5.2a (New) Adjusted daily emission factor (Tier 2)................................................................. 5.51 Equation 5.3 Adjusted CH4 emission scaling factors for organic
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Cultivation of Soils for Forestry
    Forestry Commission ARCHIVE Forestry Commission Bulletin 119 Cultivation of Soils for Forestry FORESTRY COMMISSION BULLETIN 119 Cultivation of Soils for Forestry D.B. Paterson and W. L. Mason Forest Research, Silviculture North Branch, Northern Research Station, Roslin, Midlothian EH25 9SY Forestry Commission, Edinburgh © Crown copyright 1999 Applications for reproduction should he made to HMSO, The Copyright Unit St Clements House, 2-16 Colegate, Norwich NR3 1BQ ISBN 0 85538 400 X Paterson, David B. and Mason, William L., 1999. Cultivation of Soils for Forestry. Bulletin 119. FDC 237:114:(410) KEYWORDS: Forestry, Cultivation, Soils Acknowledgements Special thanks are due to Chris Quine, Silviculturist at Northern Research Station, who made available his unpublished Cultivation Review and many background papers and references. We thank the project leaders, research foresters and workers, past and present in Silviculture (North), and the former Site Studies and Physiology Branches who initiated and managed the experiments reported here and gave permission for their results to be used. The statistical services of I.M.S. White are gratefully acknowledged. The reports of Technical Development Branch (formerly Work Study) on trials of cultivation machinery have been heavily used. Many authors outside the Forestry Commission have provided valuable information - with particular thanks to R. Schaible, M. Carey and E. Hendrick in Ireland and D.C. Malcolm of Edinburgh University. Numerous helpful comments have been made by Graham Pyatt, Richard Toleman, John Morgan, Duncan Ray, David Henderson- Howat and Brian Spencer. Karen Chambers edited and substantially improved the structure and presentation of an early draft. Finally, we are grateful to Madge Holmes for typing various drafts, Glenn Brearley for illustrations and John Parker for editorial and publishing services.
    [Show full text]
  • Detecting, Tracking and Imaging Space Debris
    r bulletin 109 — february 2002 Detecting, Tracking and Imaging Space Debris D. Mehrholz, L. Leushacke FGAN Research Institute for High-Frequency Physics and Radar Techniques, Wachtberg, Germany W. Flury, R. Jehn, H. Klinkrad, M. Landgraf European Space Operations Centre (ESOC), Darmstadt, Germany Earth’s space-debris environment tracked, with estimates for the number of Today’s man-made space-debris environment objects larger than 1 cm ranging from 100 000 has been created by the space activities to 200 000. that have taken place since Sputnik’s launch in 1957. There have been more than 4000 The sources of this debris are normal launch rocket launches since then, as well as many operations (Fig. 2), certain operations in space, other related debris-generating occurrences fragmentations as a result of explosions and such as more than 150 in-orbit fragmentation collisions in space, firings of satellite solid- events. rocket motors, material ageing effects, and leaking thermal-control systems. Solid-rocket Among the more than 8700 objects larger than 10 cm in Earth orbits, motors use aluminium as a catalyst (about 15% only about 6% are operational satellites and the remainder is space by mass) and when burning they emit debris. Europe currently has no operational space surveillance aluminium-oxide particles typically 1 to 10 system, but a powerful radar facility for the detection and tracking of microns in size. In addition, centimetre-sized space debris and the imaging of space objects is available in the form objects are formed by metallic aluminium melts, of the 34 m dish radar at the Research Establishment for Applied called ‘slag’.
    [Show full text]
  • Satellite Systems
    Chapter 18 REST-OF-WORLD (ROW) SATELLITE SYSTEMS For the longest time, space exploration was an exclusive club comprised of only two members, the United States and the Former Soviet Union. That has now changed due to a number of factors, among the more dominant being economics, advanced and improved technologies and national imperatives. Today, the number of nations with space programs has risen to over 40 and will continue to grow as the costs of spacelift and technology continue to decrease. RUSSIAN SATELLITE SYSTEMS The satellite section of the Russian In the post-Soviet era, Russia contin- space program continues to be predomi- ues its efforts to improve both its military nantly government in character, with and commercial space capabilities. most satellites dedicated either to civil/ These enhancements encompass both military applications (such as communi- orbital assets and ground-based space cations and meteorology) or exclusive support facilities. Russia has done some military missions (such as reconnaissance restructuring of its operating principles and targeting). A large portion of the regarding space. While these efforts have Russian space program is kept running by attempted not to detract from space-based launch services, boosters and launch support to military missions, economic sites, paid for by foreign commercial issues and costs have lead to a lowering companies. of Russian space-based capabilities in The most obvious change in Russian both orbital assets and ground station space activity in recent years has been the capabilities. decrease in space launches and corre- The influence of Glasnost on Russia's sponding payloads. Many of these space programs has been significant, but launches are for foreign payloads, not public announcements regarding space Russian.
    [Show full text]
  • Orbital Debris: a Chronology
    NASA/TP-1999-208856 January 1999 Orbital Debris: A Chronology David S. F. Portree Houston, Texas Joseph P. Loftus, Jr Lwldon B. Johnson Space Center Houston, Texas David S. F. Portree is a freelance writer working in Houston_ Texas Contents List of Figures ................................................................................................................ iv Preface ........................................................................................................................... v Acknowledgments ......................................................................................................... vii Acronyms and Abbreviations ........................................................................................ ix The Chronology ............................................................................................................. 1 1961 ......................................................................................................................... 4 1962 ......................................................................................................................... 5 963 ......................................................................................................................... 5 964 ......................................................................................................................... 6 965 ......................................................................................................................... 6 966 ........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Soils and Their Main Characteristics
    Higher Geography Physical Environments Biosphere Soils Higher Geography course The 3 types of soil studied as part of the Higher Geography course are: • Brown Earths •Podzols •Gleys Characteristics of Brown Earths • Free draining • Brown/reddish brown • Deciduous woodland • Litter rich in nutrients • Intense biological activity e.g. earthworms • Mull humus Brown Earth Profile • Ah-topsoil dark coloured enriched with mull humus, variable depth • B - subsoil with distinctive brown/red brown colours • Lightening in colour as organic matter/iron content decreases with depth Brown Earth: Soil forming factors • Parent material • Variable soil texture •Climate • Relatively warm, dry • Vegetation/organisms • Broadleaf woodland, mull humus, indistinct horizons • Rapid decomposition • Often earthworms and other mixers • Topography • Generally low lying •Time • Since end of last ice age c10,000 years Organisms in Brown Earths False colour SEM of mixture of soil fungi and bacteria Help create a good and well aggregated, aerated and fertile crumb structured soil Thin section of soil showing enchytraeid faecal material Earthworm activity is important in soil mixing Uses of Brown Earths • Amongst the most fertile soils in Scotland • Used extensively for agriculture e.g. winter vegetables • Fertilisers required to maintain nutrient levels under agriculture • Occurring on gently undulating terrain - used extensively for settlement and industry • Sheltered sites suit growth of trees Test yourself: Brown Earths Write down 3 characteristics of a brown earth
    [Show full text]
  • 2017-2018 New Music Festival
    3 events I 10 world premieres I 55 performers Scott Wheeler, Composer-in Residence Lisa Leonard, Director January 19- January 21, 2018 SPOTLIGHT I:YOUNG COMPOSERS Friday, January 19 at 7:30 p.m. Étude électronique (2018) Matthew Carlton World Premiere (b. 1992) Fanfare for Duane for Brass Quintet (2016) Trevor Mansell World Premiere (b. 1996) Alexander Ramazanov, Abigail Rowland, trumpet Shaun Murray, French horn Nolan Carbin, trombone Helgi Hauksson, bass trombone Mitología de las Aguas Leo Brouwer I. Nacimiento del Amazonas (b.1939) II. El lago escondido de los Mayas III. El Salto del Angel IV. El Güije (duende) de los ríos de Cuba Emilio Rutllant, flute Sam Desmet, guitar Piano Sonata No.1 “Passato di Gloria” (2016) Alfredo Cabrera I. Scherzo Scuro – Cala l’oscurita – Scherzo Scuro (b. 1996) II. OmbrainPartenza III. La Rigidità di Movimento Matthew Calderon, piano INTERMISSION Three Selections from The Gardens (2017) Anthony Trujillo I. The Gardens (b. 1995) III. The Guardian IV. The Offering Teresa Villalobos, flute; Jonathan Hearn, oboe Christopher Foss, bassoon Isaac Fernandez & Tyler Flynt, percussion Darren Matias, piano Katherine Baloff & Yordan Tenev, violins William Ford-Smith, viola Elizabeth Lee, cello; Yu-Chen Yang, bass Reminiscent Waters (2016) Matthew Carlton Sodienye Finebone, tuba Kristine Mezines, piano Five Variations on a Gregorian Chant (2016) Trevor Mansell World Premiere Guzal Isametdinova, piano Homage to Scott Joplin (2017) Trevor Mansell World Premiere Darren Matias, piano Kartoffel Tondichtung für Solo Viola und Reciter (2016) Commisssioned by Miguel Sonnak Alfredo Cabrera Text: Joseph Stroud Kayla Williams, viola Alfredo Cabrera, reciter Six Variations on Arirang (2017) Trevor Mansell Trevor Mansell, oboe John Issac Roles, bassoon Darren Matias, piano Lucidity (2016) Matthew Carlton Guzal Isametdinova, piano; Joshua Cessna, celeste; Darren Matias, electric organ MASTER CLASS with SCOTT WHEELER Saturday, January 20 at 1:00 p.m.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of the Evidence Base for the Status and Change of Soil Carbon Below 15 Cm from the Soil Surface in England and Wales
    Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Research project final report Project title Review of the evidence base for the status and change of soil carbon below 15 cm from the soil surface in England and Wales Sub-Project iii of Defra Project SP1106: Soil carbon: studies to explore greenhouse gas emissions and mitigation Defra project code SP1106 Contractor SKM Enviros Organisations Rothamsted Research / North Wyke Cranfield University British Geological Survey Report authors Andy Gregory ([email protected]), Andy Whitmore, Guy Kirk, Barry Rawlins, Karl Ritz, Phil Wallace. Project start date October 2010 Sub-project end date March 2011 Sub-project iii: Review of the evidence base for the status and change of soil carbon below 15 cm from the soil surface in England and Wales Executive summary The world‟s soils contain more carbon (C), predominantly in organic matter (OM), than the atmosphere and terrestrial plants combined. Our knowledge of soil C is largely restricted to the topsoil, but more than half of soil C is stored at depths lower than 15 cm in the subsoil. Subsoil C represents a little-understood component of the global C cycle, with potential implications with respect to predicted changes in climate; it is important that the level of understanding of subsoil C in England and Wales is clarified and that potential knowledge gaps are identified. The overall aim of this review was to evaluate the current status and dynamics of subsoil C in England and Wales by reviewing the best-available evidence and by sensible extrapolation. Further objectives sought to review the source and stability of subsoil C in general, to identify the key gaps in knowledge, and to seek evidence on how subsoil C may respond to imposed (soil management) or natural (climate change) changes in contributing factors in the future.
    [Show full text]
  • Soil Variation
    Soil Variation Have a look at some of the most common soils in Scotland’s crofting counties, as well as a couple that are only found in certain parts of the country, and how those soils are used and managed by crofters. Crofting areas in Scotland have cool and generally wet climates, which helps peat soils to develop. Ancient woodlands helped brown earth soil to form, leaching under wet and acid conditions allows podzols to form and although the woods are often gone now, the soil remains as podzols. When a soil becomes water saturated a gley soil can develop. In coastal areas crofts sometimes have soils which have developed on beach sand called Machair. The parent material influences the soil type and in a few areas the serpentinite rocks develop a rare soil called serpentine soil. 1 Peat Hi I’m Pete 2 Brown Earth Hi I’m Rusty Peat forms in very wet conditions where plant leaves, shoots As you might guess from their name brown earths are a deep and roots die and are very slowly decomposed over time. On rich brown colour, but more importantly tend to be much more average peat accumulates at about 1mm per year, is wet and fertile. They are more common on the east coast and in drier, very acid, so only those plants which are specially adapted to warmer environments. those conditions can grow. Brown earths form on rich parent material, which contains While it is not much use for farming, it is still sometimes a good balance of elements such as calcium and aluminium used as fuel (after it is dried out) and can be used to which produce pH neutral or alkaline soil.
    [Show full text]
  • Space Debris Proceedings
    THE UPDATED IAA POSITION PAPER ON ORBITAL DEBRIS W Flury 1), J M Contant 2) 1) ESA/ESOC, Robert-Bosch-Str. 5, 64293 Darmstadt, German, E-mail: [email protected] 2) EADS, Launch Vehicle, SD-DC, 78133 Les Mureaux Cédex, France, E-mail: [email protected] orbit, altitude 35786 km; HEO = high Earth orbit ABSTRACT (apogee above 2000 km). Being concerned about the space debris problem which After over 40 years of international space operations, poses a threat to the future of spaceflight, the more than 26,000 objects have been officially International Academy of Astronautics has issued in cataloged, with approximately one-third of them still in 1993 the Position Paper on Orbital Debris. The orbit about the Earth (Fig. 2). "Cataloged" objects are objectives were to evaluate the need and urgency for objects larger than 10-20 cm in diameter for LEO and 1 action and to indicate ways to reduce the hazard. Since m in diameter in higher orbits, which are sensed and then the space debris problem has gained more maintained in a database by the United States Space attention. Also, several debris preventative measures Command's Space Surveillance Network (SSN). have been introduced on a voluntary basis by designers Statistical measurements have determined that a much and operators of space systems. The updated IAA larger number of objects (> 100,000) 1cm in size or Position Paper on Orbital Debris takes into account larger are in orbit as well. These statistical the evolving space debris environment, new results of measurements are obtained by operating a few special space debris research and international policy radar facilities in the beam-park mode, where the radar developments.
    [Show full text]
  • General Soil Map of Ireland, 1969 Survey of Some Midland Sub-Peat Mineral Soils (With Bord Na Móna), 1971 — M
    SOIL SURVEY PUBLICATIONS 1962-1979 County Surveys Soils of Co. Wexford, 1964* — M. J. Gardiner and P. Ryan Soils of Co. Limerick, 1966 — T. F. Finch and P. Ryan Soils of Co. Carlow, 1967 — M. J. Conry and P. Ryan Soils of Co. Kildare, 1970 — M. J. Conry, R. F. Hammond and T. O’Shea Soils of Co. Clare, 1971 — T. F. Finch, E. Culleton and S. Diamond Soils of Co. Westmeath, 1977 — T. F. Finch and M. J. Gardiner Soils of West Cork, (part of Resource Survey) 1963 — M. J. Conry, P. Ryan and J. Lee Soils of West Donegal, (part of Resource Survey) 1969 — M. Walsh, M. Ryan and S van de Schaaf Soils of Co. Leitrim, (part of Resource Survey) 1973 — M. Walsh An Foras Talúntais Farms Grange, Co. Meath, 1962 — M. J. Gardiner Kinsealy, Co. Dublin, 1963 — M. J. Gardiner Creagh, Co. Mayo, 1963 — M. J. Gardiner Herbertstown, Co. Limerick, 1964 — T. F. Finch Drumboylan, Co. Roscommon, 1968 — G. Jaritz and J. Lee Ballintubber, Co. Roscommon, 1969 — M. Ryan and J. Lee Ballinamore, Co. Leitrim, 1969 — T. F. Finch and J. Lee Clonroche, Co. Wexford, 1970 — T. F. Finch and M. J. Gardiner Mullinahone, Co. Tipperary, 1970 — M. J. Conry Ballygagin, Co. Waterford, 1972 — T. F. Finch and M. J. Gardiner Department of Agriculture Farms Clonakilty, Co. Cork, 1964* — J. Lee and M. J. Conry Ballyhaise, Co. Cavan, 1965* — M. Ryan and J. Lee Athenry, Co. Galway, 1965* — S. Diamond, M. Ryan and M. J. Gardiner Other Farms Kells Ingram, Co. Louth, 1964* — M. J. Gardiner Multyfarnham Agricultural College, Co.
    [Show full text]
  • Mdu Proposal
    ESA Space Technical Note Issue 1 Weather Study Page 1 Contract Number 14069/99/NL/SB ESA Space Weather Study Space Segment Options Technical Note for WP420 Prepared by: Date: 11th Dec 2001 S. Eckersley Checked by: Date: 11th Dec 2001 M. Snelling © Astrium Ltd 2014 Astrium Ltd owns the copyright of this document which is supplied in confidence and which shall not be used for any purpose other than that for which it is supplied and shall not in whole or in part be reproduced, copied, or communicated to any person without written permission from the owner. Astrium Ltd Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2AS, England ESA Space Technical Note Issue 1 Weather Study Page 2 INTENTIONALLY BLANK ESA Space Technical Note Issue 1 Weather Study Page 3 CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................... 9 2. SCOPE .......................................................................................................................................................... 9 3. REFERENCE DOCUMENTS ........................................................................................................................ 9 4. METHODOLOGY ........................................................................................................................................ 11 4.1 Timing ................................................................................................................................................... 11 4.2
    [Show full text]
  • SPACE : Obstacles and Opportunities
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bstacles and Opportunities Rapporteur’s Report Alan Smith Canada -UK Colloquium, 19 -21 November 2015 The University of Strathclyde, Technology and Innovation Centre Glasgow Canada -UK Council School of Policy Studies, Queen’s University ii !"#$%&%'(&!$%'#) !"#$%&&#"'()* ' !"#$%&'()*% # %# # %#%*%#)%( ) %$( ()%($%%# %$%*( % #% ) %% $#% '$#$) !%"( % #%($" %)*% #"# % " '$)% #$ % $(%*)% % #% &#"# #% $ ($%% #)% '% &' #'% &)*% ! ) #"(#!% () $% )*% *% # % % )*% + #$% & #% !%$% #)% () % )*$"%% $) % ($% )*% ,)* "#$ % # % )*% #$% # ) * (( )% #$ % # % #$% ($ ) '$)% ($- )!% "( % # "% # % ($" % #% '($#-$% % )*$"%% " '$)% . #% $(%*)% *# # % $% + #$'% #$ % / (#$% #)""() 0'% 1)% '#$#%'$)% #$ % # ) * ( !% 2$% *% *% 1($ % $( ()% 3""%% $ $4 % 5""# % & #% &($% # #) '% ($(-#""% # % "# % % )) % * ( '%$)#""%'($%%( ) %#$ %"# %% # )'$)%.6**70!%2$%% *% # % '# % #% % % )) % * ( !%
    [Show full text]