DOCSLIB.ORG

Sign Language Cover Final.Cdr

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Sign Language Cover Final.Cdr Sign of the Times The Quality Assurance of the Teaching and Assessment of South African Sign Language SIGN OF THE TIMES The Quality Assurance of the Teaching and Assessment of South African Sign Language COPYRIGHT 2018 UMALUSI COUNCIL FOR QUALITY ASSURANCE IN GENERAL AND FURTHER EDUCATION AND TRAINING ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. While all reasonable steps are taken to ensure the accuracy and integrity of the information contained herein, Umalusi accepts no liability or responsibility whatsoever if the information is, for whatsoever reason, incorrect, and Umalusi reserves its right to amend any incorrect information. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Foreword ..................................................................................................................................... 1 Acknowledgments .................................................................................................................... 2 Acronyms and Abbreviations .................................................................................................. 3 Definitions of Terms/Concepts ................................................................................................ 5 List of Tables ................................................................................................................................ 7 South African Sign Language Fingerspelling ........................................................................ 8 Executive summary ................................................................................................................... 9 Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 9 Data and Research Methodology ................................................................................... 10 Findings and Discussion ...................................................................................................... 11 CHAPTER ONE: Background .................................................................................................. 16 1.1 Historical Background .......................................................................................... 16 1.2 Motivation .............................................................................................................. 18 1.3 Purpose ................................................................................................................... 18 1.4 Research Questions .............................................................................................. 19 CHAPTER TWO: Literature Survey – Approaches to Deaf Education in South Africa .. 20 2.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................... 20 2.2 What is a Language? ........................................................................................... 20 2.3 What is Sign Language? ...................................................................................... 21 2.4 What is SASL? ......................................................................................................... 21 2.5 Specific Aims of Learning SASL HL ..................................................................... 22 2.6 Notes on Terminology .......................................................................................... 23 2.7 SASL HL Skills ........................................................................................................... 24 2.8 An Integrated Approach – FP ............................................................................ 25 2.9 SASL Approaches to Teaching and Learning .................................................. 25 2.10 Sign Bilingualism as Described by the SASL HL CAPS ...................................... 26 2.11 The Relationship between the LOLT and the LOL ........................................... 27 2.12 SASL HL Teaching Model ..................................................................................... 29 2.13 Formal Assessment and its Purpose ................................................................... 30 2.14 SASL HL Skills and Assessment in the FP ............................................................. 30 2.15 SASL HL Skills and Assessment in the IP .............................................................. 32 iii 2.16 SASL HL Skills and Assessment in the SP ............................................................. 33 2.17 SASL HL Skills and Assessment in the FET Phase ................................................ 35 2.18 Essential Issues in Sign Language Assessment ................................................. 36 2.19 Moderation of the Sign Language Assessment Tasks .................................... 38 2.20 Standardisation ..................................................................................................... 40 2.21 Minimum Resources Required for SASL Home Language ............................. 41 2.22 SASL Laboratory Descriptions ............................................................................. 42 2.23 Recording and Reporting for Grades 4-12 ....................................................... 44 CHAPTER THREE: Literature Survey – International Approaches to Deaf Education ... 45 3.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................... 45 3.2 Deaf Education ..................................................................................................... 45 3.3 Bilingualism in Deaf Education ........................................................................... 45 3.4 Natural Sign Languages and Manual Codes for Spoken Languages ........ 48 3.5 Approaches to Deaf Education in Singapore ................................................. 49 3.6 Instructional Support to Deaf Education in Singapore .................................. 54 3.7 International Approaches to Assessment in Sign Language ........................ 55 CHAPTER FOUR: Methods ....................................................................................................... 62 4.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................... 62 4.2 Research Design ................................................................................................... 62 4.3 Research Instruments and Data Collection ..................................................... 62 4.4 Targeted and Accessible Population ............................................................... 63 4.5 Research Sample .................................................................................................. 63 CHAPTER FIVE: Research Results and Discussion ................................................................ 64 5.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................... 64 5.2 Results and Discussion of Findings ...................................................................... 64 5.3 Accommodations or Concessions .................................................................... 75 5.4 Challenges ............................................................................................................. 76 CHAPTER SIX: Recommendations ......................................................................................... 77 6.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................... 77 6.2 Areas of Good Practice ...................................................................................... 77 6.3 Areas of Concern ................................................................................................. 78 6.4 Recommendations ............................................................................................... 78 6.5 Conclusion ............................................................................................................. 80 References ................................................................................................................................ 82 iv FOREWORD In publishing this report, Umalusi wishes to signal its commitment to the ideal of a more responsible and inclusive national system of education. Through its quality assurance role, Umalusi aims to support the Deaf community in strengthening South African Sign Language. Together, we will learn from international best practices, especially from the innovative work that South Africans are doing in our own country, and use the lessons and knowledge learnt to strengthen the teaching and assessment of South African Sign Language as a Home Language. This report represents not the end, but the beginning of a journey in understanding and enhancing the South African Sign Language Curriculum. This curriculum has been constructed not only as the bedrock for learning and teaching in the Deaf community, but it also provides access to Deaf learners to truly learn and be taught in their mother tongue. Umalusi’s work in quality assuring the curriculum and assessments of this new subject is an important role, and the organisation approaches the task with great seriousness. As this report reveals, Deaf education has not always been given the respect and prominence it deserves, and indeed Deaf voices have not always been heard in the planning of the system of learning and teaching. It is with great pleasure that Umalusi can report that with the launch of the South African
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Sign Language Typology Series
    SIGN LANGUAGE TYPOLOGY SERIES The Sign Language Typology Series is dedicated to the comparative study of sign languages around the world. Individual or collective works that systematically explore typological variation across sign languages are the focus of this series, with particular emphasis on undocumented, underdescribed and endangered sign languages. The scope of the series primarily includes cross-linguistic studies of grammatical domains across a larger or smaller sample of sign languages, but also encompasses the study of individual sign languages from a typological perspective and comparison between signed and spoken languages in terms of language modality, as well as theoretical and methodological contributions to sign language typology. Interrogative and Negative Constructions in Sign Languages Edited by Ulrike Zeshan Sign Language Typology Series No. 1 / Interrogative and negative constructions in sign languages / Ulrike Zeshan (ed.) / Nijmegen: Ishara Press 2006. ISBN-10: 90-8656-001-6 ISBN-13: 978-90-8656-001-1 © Ishara Press Stichting DEF Wundtlaan 1 6525XD Nijmegen The Netherlands Fax: +31-24-3521213 email: [email protected] http://ishara.def-intl.org Cover design: Sibaji Panda Printed in the Netherlands First published 2006 Catalogue copy of this book available at Depot van Nederlandse Publicaties, Koninklijke Bibliotheek, Den Haag (www.kb.nl/depot) To the deaf pioneers in developing countries who have inspired all my work Contents Preface........................................................................................................10
    [Show full text]
  • Sign Language Endangerment and Linguistic Diversity Ben Braithwaite
    RESEARCH REPORT Sign language endangerment and linguistic diversity Ben Braithwaite University of the West Indies at St. Augustine It has become increasingly clear that current threats to global linguistic diversity are not re - stricted to the loss of spoken languages. Signed languages are vulnerable to familiar patterns of language shift and the global spread of a few influential languages. But the ecologies of signed languages are also affected by genetics, social attitudes toward deafness, educational and public health policies, and a widespread modality chauvinism that views spoken languages as inherently superior or more desirable. This research report reviews what is known about sign language vi - tality and endangerment globally, and considers the responses from communities, governments, and linguists. It is striking how little attention has been paid to sign language vitality, endangerment, and re - vitalization, even as research on signed languages has occupied an increasingly prominent posi - tion in linguistic theory. It is time for linguists from a broader range of backgrounds to consider the causes, consequences, and appropriate responses to current threats to sign language diversity. In doing so, we must articulate more clearly the value of this diversity to the field of linguistics and the responsibilities the field has toward preserving it.* Keywords : language endangerment, language vitality, language documentation, signed languages 1. Introduction. Concerns about sign language endangerment are not new. Almost immediately after the invention of film, the US National Association of the Deaf began producing films to capture American Sign Language (ASL), motivated by a fear within the deaf community that their language was endangered (Schuchman 2004).
    [Show full text]
  • Sociocultural and Linguistic Contexts of the Russian Sign Language Functioning in Krasnoyarsk Krai
    Journal of Siberian Federal University. Humanities & Social Sciences 2020 13(3): 296-303 DOI: 10.17516/1997-1370-0565 УДК 16.21.27 Sociocultural and Linguistic Contexts of the Russian Sign Language Functioning in Krasnoyarsk Krai Liudmila V. Kulikova and Sofya A. Shatokhina Siberian Federal University Krasnoyarsk, Russian Federation Received 21.02.2020, received in revised form 25.02.2020, accepted 06.03.2020 Abstract. The article contains an ethnographic description of the conditions governing the use of the regional sign language in Krasnoyarsk Krai within the modern sociolinguistic context. The subject of the discussion is the problem of the linguistic design of sign languages ​​in general, including some features of Russian Sign Language. The study provides statistical information and legal norms for the use of this iconic communication system. A study of the current state of Russian Sign Language functioning in Krasnoyarsk Krai allows us to talk about a change in the status of this sign language, an increasing interest in issues related to its applied significance, and reinforces the need to develop new theoretical approaches to its institutionalization. Keywords: Russian Sign Language, fingerspelling, regional variants, Krasnoyarsk krai, language policy. This research is supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (RFBR), Grant No. 20-012-00321 “Regional sign languages: multimodal electronic corpus (the case of the communicative space of Eastern Siberia)”. Research area: linguistics. Citation: Kulikova, L.V., Shatokhina, S.A. (2020). Sociocultural and linguistic contexts of the Russian Sign Language functioning in Krasnoyarsk Krai. J. Sib. Fed. Univ. Humanit. Soc. Sci., 13(3), 296-303. DOI: 10.17516/1997-1370-0565.
    [Show full text]
  • The Signed Languages of Indonesia: an Enigma
    DigitalResources Electronic Survey Report 2014-005 ® The Signed Languages of Indonesia: An Enigma Hope M. Hurlbut The Signed Languages of Indonesia: An Enigma Hope M. Hurlbut SIL International® 2014 SIL Electronic Survey Report 2014-005, April 2014 © 2014 SIL International® All rights reserved 1 2 Abstract In 2003–2005, SIL International undertook a lexicostatistical survey of the signed languages of Indonesia. Wordlists and stories were collected from each of the nineteen states where one or more schools for the Deaf were run privately or by the government. The wordlists were video recorded and transcribed by hand using the SignWriting orthography. The results of the wordlist comparisons point out the need for intelligibility testing between users of the various varieties of Indonesian Sign Language. Intelligibility testing should be carried out sometime in at least eleven of the nineteen states where the similarity between the signs in the list is low. This paper focuses on the results of the lexicostatistical survey. There are at least two signed languages in use in Indonesia, Indonesian Sign Language and Bengkala Sign Language. Bengkala Sign Language is an isolect found in northern Bali in the village of Bengkala where there is a high proportion of Deaf among the inhabitants. It has been called Bali Sign Language in the past, but since it seems to be more or less confined to the village of Bengkala, it seems better to call it Bengkala Sign Language. The rest of the Deaf on the island use a form of Indonesian Sign Language. At the time of the survey there were two Deaf youth from Bengkala going to school in the Deaf school (or a Deaf class) in Singaraja which is about 17 kilometers from Bengkala Village.
    [Show full text]
  • Typology of Signed Languages: Differentiation Through Kinship Terminology Erin Wilkinson
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by University of New Mexico University of New Mexico UNM Digital Repository Linguistics ETDs Electronic Theses and Dissertations 7-1-2009 Typology of Signed Languages: Differentiation through Kinship Terminology Erin Wilkinson Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/ling_etds Recommended Citation Wilkinson, Erin. "Typology of Signed Languages: Differentiation through Kinship Terminology." (2009). https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/ling_etds/40 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Electronic Theses and Dissertations at UNM Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Linguistics ETDs by an authorized administrator of UNM Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. TYPOLOGY OF SIGNED LANGUAGES: DIFFERENTIATION THROUGH KINSHIP TERMINOLOGY BY ERIN LAINE WILKINSON B.A., Language Studies, Wellesley College, 1999 M.A., Linguistics, Gallaudet University, 2001 DISSERTATION Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Linguistics The University of New Mexico Albuquerque, New Mexico August, 2009 ©2009, Erin Laine Wilkinson ALL RIGHTS RESERVED iii DEDICATION To my mother iv ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Many thanks to Barbara Pennacchi for kick starting me on my dissertation by giving me a room at her house, cooking me dinner, and making Italian coffee in Rome during November 2007. Your endless support, patience, and thoughtful discussions are gratefully taken into my heart, and I truly appreciate what you have done for me. I heartily acknowledge Dr. William Croft, my advisor, for continuing to encourage me through the long number of months writing and rewriting these chapters.
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of Linguistic Colonialism on the Singapore Deaf
    Revisiting the past to understand the present: The impact of linguistic colonialism on the Singapore Deaf Community and the evolution of Singapore Sign Language (SgSL) Phoebe Tay Gallaudet University & Deaf Bible Society • Peng introduced Shanghainese Sign Language (SSL) and written Background Chinese as the language of instruction in the school (Singapore Commentary on Language Debate Singapore has a history of colonialism, in both Singapore society and School for the Deaf 50th Anniversary Celebration 1963-2013 2013). Name: Ned (Pseudonym) the Singapore Deaf Community. This has influenced language • The Red Cross Society also provided an education for deaf Gender: Male ideologies and evolution of both spoken and sign languages. This children using oral communication modes around the same time. Age: 37 research examines the impact of linguistic colonialism on the • 1963 - the Singapore Chinese Sign School merged with the oral Ethnicity: Chinese Singapore Deaf Community and how language ideologies of Singapore school for the deaf. This became the Singapore School for the Deaf Background: deaf family, native SSL user society influence those of the Deaf community. The factors contributing (SSD). The school had a Chinese sign section and an oral section. Q: Do you think SEE-II benefits Deaf children? to historical change of sign language in Singapore will be explored. Peng became its first deaf principal. A: Yes, SEE is a must! Sure, it benefits deaf children. As it enforces According to Fontana, et al. (2017, 363), “changes in language attitude •Since SSD’s inception, there have been changes in deaf education the sentence to be gestured out word by word in a proper flow.
    [Show full text]
  • Toponyms in Ban Khor Sign Language | Angela M
    Toponyms in Ban Khor Sign Language | Angela M. Nonaka 66 Toponyms in Ban Khor Sign Language Angela M. Nonaka The University of Texas at Austin (USA) [email protected] Introduction Ban Khor Sign Language (BKSL) is a rare language variety known as a ‘village’ (Zeshan 2004) or ‘indigenous’ (Woodward 2000) sign language. This type of sign language develops in small face-to-face communities where historically there are/were: 1) demographically `1#$%%%%}`` #####$}`T$ } ~` $ #} ` %T$!;# characteristics of the language ecologies of signing village communities, however, involve their local language ideologies and practices. In such communities, there are no sign language interpreters. Instead, it is common not only for deaf people but also for hearing residents to acquire and use the village sign language. Because it is widely used by both deaf and hearing people in the course of everyday life, the village sign language facilitates the inclusion (vs. exclusion) of deaf members of the community. Villages with indigenous sign languages are unusual but have been found elsewhere: in Africa, the Americas, Asia, Australia and Oceania, the Caribbean, and the Middle East (Branson & ^}@!}#$$}}} }@}X;}$¥}}¨}¨ }~}=#}=$}=~¥ $}=¥}=}+#¢^$}+ }^+¥}^}^%#¢<}^!} ~$}¥}!}\ !}}*!}*$}*#};! }@}$¥}`!* communities’ alternative social constructions of and communicative responses to deafness is enriching anthropological understanding of cultural variation, and research on the local sign languages is expanding knowledge of linguistics in areas such as: documentary linguistics, typological linguistics, historical linguistics, language universals, and so on. In anthropological linguistics, there is a robust literature on onomastics—the study of the origin and forms of proper names (personal, place, brand, etc.). Names are interesting and useful phenomena for linguistic and cultural analysis because naming systems and practices mirror and order the social world.
    [Show full text]
  • Goat-Sheep-Mixed-Sign” in Lhasa - Deaf Tibetans’ Language Ideologies and Unimodal Codeswitching in Tibetan and Chinese Sign Languages, Tibet Autonomous Region, China’
    Hofer, T. (2020). "Goat-Sheep-Mixed-Sign” in Lhasa - Deaf Tibetans’ Language Ideologies and Unimodal Codeswitching in Tibetan and Chinese Sign Languages, Tibet Autonomous Region, China’. In A. Kusters, M. E. Green, E. Moriarty Harrelson, & K. Snoddon (Eds.), Sign Language Ideologies in Practice (pp. 81-105). DeGruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501510090-005 Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record License (if available): CC BY-NC-ND Link to published version (if available): 10.1515/9781501510090-005 Link to publication record in Explore Bristol Research PDF-document This is the final published version of the article (version of record). It first appeared online via DeGruyter at https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501510090-005 . Please refer to any applicable terms of use of the publisher. University of Bristol - Explore Bristol Research General rights This document is made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the reference above. Full terms of use are available: http://www.bristol.ac.uk/red/research-policy/pure/user-guides/ebr-terms/ Theresia Hofer “Goat-Sheep-Mixed-Sign” in Lhasa – Deaf Tibetans’ language ideologies and unimodal codeswitching in Tibetan and Chinese sign languages, Tibet Autonomous Region, China 1 Introduction Among Tibetan signers in Lhasa, there is a growing tendency to mix Tibetan Sign Language (TSL) and Chinese Sign Language (CSL). I have been learning TSL from deaf TSL teachers and other deaf, signing Tibetan friends since 2007, but in more recent conversations with them I have been more and more exposed to CSL. In such contexts, signing includes not only loan signs, loan blends or loan trans- lations from CSL that have been used in TSL since its emergence, such as signs for new technical inventions or scientific terms.
    [Show full text]
  • Situation of Sign Language Interpreting in the Asian Region (July 2015)
    Situation of sign language interpreting in the Asian region (July 2015) 1. How many accredited sign language interpreters are there in your country? Country Number of interpreters Bangladesh 30 interpreters Cambodia 6 interpreters are employed by the DDP program and 2 interpreters from Punonpen. China Hong Kong Approx. 10 interpreters. There is no certified interpreter. India 45 Diploma (Top Level in ISL so far) passed from AYJNIHH, currently undergoing Diploma in ISL interpreting – 43. Approx 20 from Ramakrishna Mission ISL centre. But NOT ALL are registered with Rehabilitation Council of India yet. Rest basic B level (6 months training) interpreters approx – 80 Indonesia At the moment in Jakarta we have 7 active SLI from 14-SLI that are accepted by Gerkatin (the mother organization for the deaf in Indonesia) and are used in formal and informal events. There are about 15 SLI serving in churches, a decreased from 20-SLI in 2010. Japan Nationally certified: 3,500 Prefecturally certified: about 4,000-5,000 Employed sign language interpreters: 1,500 Jordan Approx. 35 certified interpreters. Possibly another 35 non-certified. Quite a number are CODA’s with minimal education. Most interpreters have Diploma or University degrees. Interpreter training done at one of the Institute for Deaf Education. Plans are afoot to formalize and develop Interpreter training and take it to Diploma level. Macau Macau Deaf Association has 7 sign language interpreters at work currently. Malaysia 50 interpreters in Malaysia Association of Sign Language Interpreters (Myasli). 80 accredited sign Language interpreters in Malaysia. Mongolia We do not have an accreditation system yet.
    [Show full text]
  • 8. Classifiers
    158 II. Morphology 8. Classifiers 1. Introduction 2. Classifiers and classifier categories 3. Classifier verbs 4. Classifiers in signs other than classifier verbs 5. The acquisition of classifiers in sign languages 6. Classifiers in spoken and sign languages: a comparison 7. Conclusion 8. Literature Abstract Classifiers (currently also called ‘depicting handshapes’), are observed in almost all sign languages studied to date and form a well-researched topic in sign language linguistics. Yet, these elements are still subject to much debate with respect to a variety of matters. Several different categories of classifiers have been posited on the basis of their semantics and the linguistic context in which they occur. The function(s) of classifiers are not fully clear yet. Similarly, there are differing opinions regarding their structure and the structure of the signs in which they appear. Partly as a result of comparison to classifiers in spoken languages, the term ‘classifier’ itself is under debate. In contrast to these disagreements, most studies on the acquisition of classifier constructions seem to consent that these are difficult to master for Deaf children. This article presents and discusses all these issues from the viewpoint that classifiers are linguistic elements. 1. Introduction This chapter is about classifiers in sign languages and the structures in which they occur. Classifiers are reported to occur in almost all sign languages researched to date (a notable exception is Adamorobe Sign Language (AdaSL) as reported by Nyst (2007)). Classifiers are generally considered to be morphemes with a non-specific meaning, which are expressed by particular configurations of the manual articulator (or: hands) and which represent entities by denoting salient characteristics.
    [Show full text]
  • Sociolinguistic Variation in Hong Kong Sign Language
    Sociolinguistic Variation in Hong Kong Sign Language by Wai Yan Rebecca Siu A thesis submitted to the Victoria University of Wellington in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Linguistics Victoria University of Wellington 2016 Abstract Internal lexical variation appears to be a prominent feature within signed languages; it is perhaps a result of their distinctive acquisition patterns and fragile transmission. Recent research in different signed languages indicates that sociolinguistic variation within signed languages parallels some patterns found in spoken languages, though with some factors dis- tinct to the former. This research examines sociolinguistic variation in a regional sign language, Hong Kong Sign Language (HKSL), “spoken” by deaf people in Hong Kong. The focus of this dissertation is lexical vari- ation and two phonological variations in the signs DEAF/HEARING, and ‘location drop’ in articulation of signs made at the forehead. This research project is a modified replication of the earlier studies in American Sign Language, Australian Sign Language, and New Zealand Sign Language (Lucas, Bayley, & Valli, 2001; Schembri, McKee, McKee, Pi- vac, Johnston, & Goswell, 2009; McKee & McKee, 2011). The data of 65 participants recruited from the researcher’s networks in the HKSL com- munity using the friend-of-a-friend method was analyzed. Three types of data were collected: free conversation, picture naming and interview. A set of 120 pictures (with/without Chinese characters) was used to elicit signs for the concepts represented. Fifty-one out of these 120 concepts were analyzed from the semantic domains of colour, kinship, number, ii and country/region.
    [Show full text]
  • The Deaf of Singapore the Singapore Sign Language Community the Deaf in Singapore Are Found in Every Language Group
    Profile Year: 2011 People and Language Detail Profile Language Name: Singapore Sign Language ISO Language Code: sls The Deaf of Singapore The Singapore Sign Language Community The Deaf in Singapore are found in every language group. Since Singapore is a first world country the percentage of deaf is probably comparable to the percentage in Western countries, i.e. 1 to 2 in every 1000 births. There are three major races found in Singapore: the Chinese are often Buddhist, some are Christian, Indian are Hindu with some Christian, and Malay are mostly Muslim. There are four official languages, Mandarin (Chinese), Tamil (Indian), Malay and English. While a hearing person in Singapore is likely to know several languages, the deaf are at a severe disadvantage to learn to lip-read and speak because of all these languages. The standard of living is higher than that of any of the nearby nations. Singapore is a fairly flat, small island with a few hills in the centre. It is a crowded city with many well built roads and high rise apartments, located just across a causeway from the southern tip of Malaysia. In Singapore, the children are taught Signed Singaporean English Primary Religion: which is not the way they sign when among themselves. Research is Mixed—see description needed to see if the community would want and would use Holy ____________________________________________________________ Disciples (Matt 28:19): Scripture if it were translated into their vernacular Singapore Sign Unknown Language. ____________________________________________________________
    [Show full text]