DOCSLIB.ORG

List Profile Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
List Profile Report List Profile Report Cleansing Summary Usage Guidance Threat Intelligence Detail Traps Moles Quarantine Seed Key Delivery Intelligence Detail Invalid Parked Site Dormant Account Discretionary Certified Safe to Send Data Export Specs Testing and Evaluation File Name: SAMPLE_FILE Report Date: May 11, 2017 Cleansing Summary iRecipient Count Raw File. Raw file counts with duplicate entries removed. 1,320,186 (100.0%) Threat Intelligence Trap. Purpose-built, Spam-trap, or Honeypot e-mail address, any e-mail 223 messages sent to this address are immediately considered unsolicited. (.0%) Email address has known association of having direct ownership or control over the resources involved with the reception of a message leading to its submission to one or more DNSBL sites. Mole. Collaborating recipient submission-based or domain-level, 5,911 anti-spam solution with no current, direct ownership of resources (.4%) involved. Yet historical evidence firmly establishes a relationship to one or more DNSBL sites. Quarantine. Once active traps gone dormant may become reactivated 1,629 during a 90 day period. Yet actively considered certified. (.1%) Seed. Third party oversight email address used for general monitoring 833 of company's network resources. Removal of litigators and collaborative (.1%) anti-spam activists historically known to purposely seed their email address(es) for the purpose of litigation. Key. Complex pattern recognition and threat string algorithms designed 579 to remove intra-domain recipients employed by that domain for use as (.0%) spam traps. Delivery Intelligence Invalid. Defined as the inability to actually deliver an email message to 30,308 intended recipient's receiving domain per RFC standards. (2.3%) Parked Site. Email addresses that after careful evaluation have been 2,036 established to be least likely to be responsive or engage. (.2%) Dormant Account. TLD account with no login activity for a long period 1,783 of time, the recipient account is defined by the provider as “inactive” and (.1%) turned into a form of unknowing collaborator with no non-delivery report (NDR) indicating “no such user” or “mailbox not found” being sent as a response. Discretionary. We are able to conclude that these email addresses do 57,327 not represent a threat and are safe to send to. These addresses, (4.3%) commonly referred to as “Accept All’s”, contain a domain-wide setting that does not allow for anyone to conclusively verify that these addresses are deliverable. Certified Safe to Send. Email address with no known reason to expect 1,221,340 a delivery failure or harm to email senders online reputation. (92.5%) List Profile Report - 05/11/2017 - SAMPLE_FILE Page 2 of 13 Recommended Usage Guidance The guidelines presented below will ensure you are adhering to email best practices, enabling more emails to reach the inbox. As a result, you will mitigate any risk associated with emailing to potentially “bad” addresses and you will experience additional opens, higher click through rates, increased conversions, and more revenue while protecting your online reputation. Safe to Send Send ONLY if Recipient was organically acquired with user-based submission evidence OR has purchase activity within last 90 days (open/click activity excluded) Do Not Send Threat Intelligence Detail Impressionwise’s data intelligence platform is based on policy-driven rule sets and real-time scanning algorithms that use a multi-layered approach to identify, validate and protect against a wide range of e-mail-based threats. These threats, ranging in severity, are broken down into the following categories for flexibility in customized export usage options while providing unprecedented, detailed insight. Traps, Moles and Quarantine Trap. Purpose-built, Spam-trap, or Honeypot e-mail address, any e-mail messages sent to this address are immediately considered unsolicited. Email address has known association of having direct ownership or control over the resources involved with the reception of a message leading to its submission to one or more DNSBL sites. Quarantine. Once active traps gone dormant may become reactivated during a 90 day period. Yet actively considered certified. Quarantined values shown below in ( ). Mole. Knowing or un-knowing collaborating recipient providing submission-based evidence manually or via automated, domain-level, anti-spam solution with no current, direct ownership of resources involved with the acquisition and processing of this email leading to its submission to a DNSBL. Yet historical evidence firmly establishes a relationship to one or more DNSBL sites. Brand/ Network Resource/ Deliverability Harm: If your firm is impacted by threats in this section, you need to take immediate action as a laundry list of negative outcomes have potentially already begun ranging from significant deliverability issues to service termination from your ESP or ISP. If ignored, your brand reputation could be permanently tarnished and easily become associated in some circles with known spam organizations such as SpamHaus’s ROKSO or other similar blacklists. List Profile Report - 05/11/2017 - SAMPLE_FILE Page 3 of 13 DNE Elements Description Type Domains (Quaran) Recip (Quaran) AB.SURBL.org URIBL Trap 0 (3) 0 (3) Abuseat.org (CBL) RBL Trap 0 0 BBFH RBL Trap 1 (8) 1 (8) Invaluement RBL Trap 3 (4) 3 (4) JP.SURBL.org URIBL (user app net not incld) Trap 1 (134) 1 (139) MailPolice.com RBL Trap 5 (61) 5 (74) MainSleaze SpamBouncer RBL Trap 0 0 Project Honey Pot (http:BL) RBL Trap 0 (3) 0 (3) SORBS.net-BBFH.org RBL Trap 3 (13) 5 (16) SpamCop RBL Trap 5 (7) 8 (8) Spamhaus Contributing Partners Trap 0 0 Spamhaus DBL URI-RBL Trap 0 0 SpamHaus RBL Trap 4 (9) 4 (64) SURBL.org URI-RBL Trap 4 (1) 22 (1) UCE Protect RBL Trap 1 (1) 1 (1) Unspam Technologies Trap 0 0 URIBL.org URI-RBL Trap 7 (1) 9 (1) WS.SURBL.org URIBL Trap 3 (2) 3 (3) Bounce.io Seed Network Mole 0 0 General Spamtrap Contributing Network Mole 0 0 HostKarma RBL Mole 19 (6) 42 (6) MailPolice Contributing Network Mole 0 0 SORBS Contributing Network Mole 0 0 SpamCop Mole Mole 0 0 SpamCop Network Mole Mole 82 (2) 83 (2) SpamHaus Network Mole Mole 55 (8) 105 (73) Spamstophere/ Spamanalyzer.com Mole 68 (13) 81 (15) UCE Protect Network Mole Mole 45 (34) 64 (35) Unspam Technologies RBL Mole 71 (19) 72 (20) Network Resource/ Deliverability Impacted: Below are threats that could cause some significant delivery and reputational issues. At worst, you will experience continued delivery impacts and may be forced to purchase new sending domain and IP resources in order to achieve optimal deliverability. DNE Elements Description Type Domains (Quaran) Recip (Quaran) Abusix RBL Trap 1 2 AHBL.org RBL Trap 0 (8) 0 (23) Backscatterer.org RBL Trap 0 0 Barracuda RBL Trap 3 3 List Profile Report - 05/11/2017 - SAMPLE_FILE Page 4 of 13 DNE Elements Description Type Domains (Quaran) Recip (Quaran) BBQ RBL Trap 10 (1) 13 (1) Cloudmark Anti-Spam Network DNE Trap 0 0 Day Old Bread-SupportIntelligence.com URIBL Trap 0 (8) 0 (12) DeadBeef RBL Trap 0 0 Fail2Ban/ Blocklist.de Reporting Service RBL Trap 25 (7) 27 (10) Internet Defence Systems RBL Trap 0 (1) 0 (1) Kempt.net RBL Trap 0 0 MailSpike RBL Trap 0 0 Mobile Device FTC DNE Trap 0 0 NJABL.org RBL Trap 0 (2) 0 (8) NoSolicitado.org Trap 19 (10) 26 (43) NSZones URIBL Trap 0 (2) 0 (4) Passive Spam Block List Trap 0 0 Polar Communictions RBL Trap 2 2 RFC-Ignorant RBL Trap 0 0 Spambulance RBL Trap 0 0 SpamCannibal RBL Trap 0 (142) 0 (216) SpamEatingMonkey.net RBL Trap 5 (3) 7 (4) Spamgrouper.com Trap 0 0 SpamRats.com RBL Trap 3 4 StopSpam.org RBL Trap 0 0 V4BL RBL Trap 0 0 WPBL (Weighted Private Block List) RBL Trap 0 0 Invalument Contributing Network Mole 5 6 MaySoft SpamSentinel DNE Mole 0 0 NJABL.org Network Mole Mole 6 6 Redcondor Anti-Spam Network DNE Mole 639 (51) 4,522 (111) SURBL Contributing Network Mole 0 0 SURBL JP (jwSpamSpy + Prolocation) Mole 4 4 SURBL OB (Outblaze) Mole 1 1 SURBL SC (SpamCop/Spamvertised Site) Mole 0 0 SURBL WS (Bill Stearns' SpamAssassin) Mole 2 (1) 2 (1) URIBL Contributing Network Moles Mole 1 (1) 1 (1) Impacted Delivery: The following threats will result in temporal delivery issues, diminishing your campaign's outreach and effectiveness. Prolonged sending of these threats may result in longer lasting temporary blocks leading to eventual permanent blocking of your emails. There is minimal overall brand and sending resource reputational harm from these items. List Profile Report - 05/11/2017 - SAMPLE_FILE Page 5 of 13 DNE Elements Description Type Domains (Quaran) Recip (Quaran) Abuse.ch Swiss Security Network Trap 0 0 BlakJak RBL Trap 0 0 Burnt-Tech DNSBL Trap 0 0 CanTV DNSBL Trap 0 0 CASA RBL Trap 0 0 Choon RBL Trap 0 0 Cyberlogic DNSBL Trap 0 (1) 0 (4) Cymru Bogon DNSBL Trap 0 (4) 0 (7) Cyveillance Threat Intelligence Network Trap 0 0 D. D. N. S. B. L. RBL Trap 0 0 dnsbl.othello.ch DNSBL Trap 0 0 DNSBLChile RBL Trap 0 0 DRBL Trap 0 0 DSBL.org RBL Trap 0 (4) 0 (4) Dynamic Domain Name Spoofers RBL Trap 0 0 eBlockade.com RBL Trap 0 0 EFnet RBL Trap 0 0 Emailbasura DNSBL Trap 0 0 FusionZero RBL Trap 0 0 HostsControl DNSBL Trap 0 0 IBM DNS Blacklist Trap 1 1 Intercept DNS RBL Trap 0 0 Interserver DNSBL Trap 0 0 iX RBL Trap 0 0 JIPPGs RBL Project Trap 0 0 Karmasphere RBL Trap 0 0 KISA-RBL Trap 0 0 MXRate RBL Trap 0 0 NiX Spam DNSBL Trap 0 0 No-More-Funn RBL Trap 0 0 NoToSpam.com Trap 0 0 Nukesapm.org RBL Trap 0 0 ORBITrbl RBL Trap 0 (1) 0 (1) Pedantic RBL Trap 0 0 PowerWeb DNSBL Trap 0 0 Quorum Listing Service Trap 0 0 Redhawk RBL Trap 0 0 S5H RBL Trap
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Characterizing Pixel Tracking Through the Lens of Disposable Email Services
    Characterizing Pixel Tracking through the Lens of Disposable Email Services Hang Hu, Peng Peng, Gang Wang Department of Computer Science, Virginia Tech fhanghu, pengp17, [email protected] Abstract—Disposable email services provide temporary email services are highly popular. For example, Guerrilla Mail, one addresses, which allows people to register online accounts without of the earliest services, has processed 8 billion emails in the exposing their real email addresses. In this paper, we perform past decade [3]. the first measurement study on disposable email services with two main goals. First, we aim to understand what disposable While disposable email services allow users to hide their email services are used for, and what risks (if any) are involved real identities, the email communication itself is not necessar- in the common use cases. Second, we use the disposable email ily private. More specifically, most disposable email services services as a public gateway to collect a large-scale email dataset maintain a public inbox, allowing any user to access any for measuring email tracking. Over three months, we collected a dataset from 7 popular disposable email services which contain disposable email addresses at any time [6], [5]. Essentially 2.3 million emails sent by 210K domains. We show that online disposable email services are acting as a public email gateway accounts registered through disposable email addresses can be to receive emails. The “public” nature not only raises interest- easily hijacked, leading to potential information leakage and ing questions about the security of the disposable email service financial loss. By empirically analyzing email tracking, we find itself, but also presents a rare opportunity to empirically collect that third-party tracking is highly prevalent, especially in the emails sent by popular services.
    [Show full text]
  • Protect Yourself and Your Personal Information*
    CYBER SAFETY Protect yourself and your personal information * Cybercrime is a growing and serious threat, making it essential that fraud prevention is part of our daily activities. Put these safeguards in place as soon as possible—if you haven’t already. Email Public Wi-Fi/hotspots Key Use separate email accounts: one each Minimize the use of unsecured, public networks CYBER SAFETY for work, personal use, user IDs, alerts Turn oF auto connect to non-preferred networks 10 notifications, other interests Tips Turn oF file sharing Choose a reputable email provider that oFers spam filtering and multi-factor authentication When public Wi-Fi cannot be avoided, use a 1 Create separate email accounts virtual private network (VPN) to help secure your for work, personal use, alert Use secure messaging tools when replying session to verified requests for financial or personal notifications and other interests information Disable ad hoc networking, which allows direct computer-to-computer transmissions Encrypt important files before emailing them 2 Be cautious of clicking on links or Never use public Wi-Fi to enter personal attachments sent to you in emails Do not open emails from unknown senders credentials on a website; hackers can capture Passwords your keystrokes 3 Use secure messaging tools when Create complex passwords that are at least 10 Home networks transmitting sensitive information characters; use a mix of numbers, upper- and Create one network for you, another for guests via email or text message lowercase letters and special characters and children
    [Show full text]
  • Yahoo Mail Application for Java Mobile
    Yahoo Mail Application For Java Mobile Pail coact late as fissiparous Hamlen hit her Iraqi understated mumblingly. Putrescible and mellifluous Marlin always sparers blithely and consummate his Glendower. Helmuth retry pesteringly if overshot Diego sing or indagated. Abandoned and obsolete accounts are often quickly deleted from the server, I cannot open many mails in new tab. The IMAP provider seems to lose data when I fetch messages with large attachments. How to Send Files to Your Cell Phone Using Gmail. Shop Wayfair for a zillion things home across all styles and budgets. This problem can sometimes be caused by disabling or refusing to accept cookies. How i can use this but with another smtp? After installing or across your sales crm for yahoo mail application java app screen am i love. Best cloud magic of the original audio magazine, mail application for yahoo java mobile device and special button below is a simple online communities that translate websites with productivity with. All genuine Alfa Laval Service Kits include relevant wear parts, legally binding and free. The stock android app and gmail app still get mail fine. If you choose the incorrect security protocol, email, your team can get work done faster. The Searchmetrics Suite for enterprise companies is the global leader in SEO marketing and analytics, and services that help your small business grow. Start your free trial! The cloud, from anywhere. Loans, starch, schedule and manage your Instagrams from your desktop or smartphone. Build responsive websites in your browser, we could stop pandering to email clients at this point.
    [Show full text]
  • Clam Antivirus 0.90 User Manual Contents 1
    Clam AntiVirus 0.90 User Manual Contents 1 Contents 1 Introduction 3 1.1 Features.................................. 3 1.2 MailinglistsandIRCchannel . 4 1.3 Virussubmitting.............................. 5 2 Base package 5 2.1 Supportedplatforms............................ 5 2.2 Binarypackages.............................. 5 3 Installation 6 3.1 Requirements ............................... 6 3.2 Installingonshellaccount . 6 3.3 Addingnewsystemuserandgroup. 7 3.4 Compilationofbasepackage . 7 3.5 Compilationwithclamav-milterenabled . .... 7 4 Configuration 8 4.1 clamd ................................... 8 4.1.1 On-accessscanning.. .. .. .. .. .. .. 8 4.2 clamav-milter ............................... 9 4.3 Testing................................... 9 4.4 Settingupauto-updating . 10 4.4.1 Closestmirrors .......................... 11 5 Usage 11 5.1 Clamdaemon ............................... 11 5.2 Clamdscan ................................ 12 5.3 Clamuko.................................. 13 5.4 Outputformat............................... 13 5.4.1 clamscan ............................. 13 5.4.2 clamd............................... 14 6 LibClamAV 15 6.1 Licence .................................. 15 6.2 Supportedformats............................. 15 6.2.1 Executables............................ 15 6.2.2 Mailfiles ............................. 16 6.2.3 Archivesandcompressedfiles . 16 Contents 2 6.2.4 Documents ............................ 16 6.2.5 Others............................... 17 6.3 Hardwareacceleration . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 17 6.4 API ...................................
    [Show full text]
  • A L33t Speak
    A l33t Speak The term “l33t Speak” (pronounced “leet”) refers to a language or a notational system widely used by hackers. This notation is unique because it cannot be handwritten or spoken. It is an Internet-based notation that relies on the keyboard. It is simple to learn and has room for creativity. Web site [bbc 04] is just one of many online references to this topic. Many other artificial languages or notational rules have been described or used in literature. The following are a few examples. Elvish in J. R. R. Tolkien’s The Lord of the Rings. Newspeak in George Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four. Ptydepe in V´aclav Havel’s The Memorandum. Nadsat in Anthony Burgess’ A Clockwork Orange. Marain in Iain M. Banks’ The Player of Games and his other Culture novels. Pravic in Ursula K. LeGuin’s The Dispossessed. The history of l33t speak is tied up with the Internet. In the early 1980s, as the Internet started to become popular, hackers became aware of themselves as a “species.” They wanted a notation that will both identify them as hackers and will make it difficult for others to locate hacker Web sites and newsgroups on the Internet with a simple search. Since a keyboard is one of the chief tools used by a hacker, it is no wonder that the new notation developed from the keyboard. The initial, tentative steps in the development of l33t speak have simply replaced certain letters (mostly vowels) by digits with similar glyphs, so A was replaced by 4 and E was replaced by 3.
    [Show full text]
  • A Multi-Faceted Approach Towards Spam-Resistible Mail ♣
    A Multi-Faceted Approach towards Spam-Resistible Mail ♣ Ming-Wei Wu* Yennun Huang † Shyue-Kung Lu‡ Ing-Yi Chen§ Sy-Yen Kuo* * Department of Electrical Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan ABSTRACT Jupiter Research estimates the average e-mail user As checking SPAM became part of our daily life, will receive more than 3,900 spam mails per year by unsolicited bulk e-mails (UBE) have become 2007, up from just 40 in 1999, and Ferris Research unmanageable and intolerable. Bulk volume of spam estimates spam costs U.S. companies 10 billion in e-mails delivering to mail transfer agents (MTAs) is 2003 and a user spends on the average 4 seconds to similar to the effect of denial of services (DDoS) process a SPAM mail. As bulk volume of spam mails attacks as it dramatically reduces the dependability overtakes legitimate mails, as reported by ZDNet and efficiency of networking systems and e-mail Australia, the effect of spam mails is similar to denial servers. Spam mails may also be used to carry viruses of service attacks (DOS) on computer servers as the and worms which could significantly affect the dependability and efficiency of networking systems availability of computer systems and networks. There and e-mail servers are dramatically reduced. Spam is have been many solutions proposed to filter spam in also used to disseminate virus and spyware which the past. Unfortunately there is no silver bullet to may severely affect the dependability of computer deter spammers and eliminate spam mails. That is, in systems and networks. isolation, each of existing spam protection There is no silver bullet, unfortunately, to deter mechanisms has its own advantages and spammers and eliminate spam as each of existing disadvantages.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Chapter
    TThhee DDeeffiinniittiivvee GGuuiiddeett m mTToo Email Management and Security Kevin Beaver Chapter 3 Chapter 3: Understanding and Preventing Spam...........................................................................44 What’s the Big Deal about Spam?.................................................................................................45 Scary Spam Statistics.........................................................................................................46 Example Estimated Cost of Spam......................................................................................46 Additional Spam Costs ......................................................................................................47 Unintended Side Effects ....................................................................................................47 Security Implications of Spam...........................................................................................48 What’s in it for Spammers? ...........................................................................................................48 Spam Laws.....................................................................................................................................49 State Anti-Spam Laws .......................................................................................................50 Tricks Spammers Use ....................................................................................................................51 Identifying Spam................................................................................................................52
    [Show full text]
  • An Analysis of Various Tools, Methods and Systems to Generate Fake Accounts for Social Media
    An analysis of various tools, methods and systems to generate fake accounts for social media A Thesis Proposal Presented by Avanish Pathak to the faculty of College of Computer and Information Science in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Information Assurance Northeastern University Boston, Massachusetts December 2014 Contents Abstract 3 1 Introduction 4 2 Background and Related Work 7 2.1 The Market for Fake Accounts . .7 2.2 Spam and Scams . .8 2.3 Online Propaganda . .8 2.4 Countermeasures . .9 3 Methodology 11 3.1 Identifying Account Creation Tools . 11 3.2 Evaluation Methodology . 12 3.3 Ethics . 13 4 Tools 14 4.1 Twitter Account Creator Bot . 14 4.2 FB Mass Account Generator . 15 4.3 PinMass . 16 4.4 FACreator . 17 4.5 Account Creator Extreme . 19 5 Analysis 21 5.1 Creating Accounts . 21 5.2 Verification . 22 5.3 Security Countermeasures . 23 5.4 Phoning Home . 24 6 Discussion 26 6.1 Effectiveness of Existing Countermeasures . 26 6.2 Next-Generation Attack Tools . 27 6.3 Improving Countermeasures . 28 7 Conclusion 29 Bibliography 30 2 Abstract Fake accounts on Online Social Networks (OSNs) have become a basic resource used in various kinds of online attacks. While some of these attacks are annoying but innocuous, other attacks are more serious and can wreak havoc online. Popular OSNs and webmail providers have adopted many security measures to halt the mass creation of fake accounts. However, their security measures are often rendered ineffective by the many tools available on underground marketplaces that allow unscrupulous individuals to cheaply acquire fake accounts in bulk.
    [Show full text]
  • An Overview of Spam Handling Techniques Prashanth Srikanthan Computer Science Department George Mason University Fairfax, Virginia 22030
    An Overview of Spam Handling Techniques Prashanth Srikanthan Computer Science Department George Mason University Fairfax, Virginia 22030 Abstract Flooding the Internet with many copies of the same email message is known as spamming. While spammers can send thousands or even millions of spam emails at negligible cost, the recipient pays a considerable price for receiveing this unwanted mail. Decreases in worker productivity, available bandwidth, data storage, and mail server efficiency are among the major problems caused by the reception of spam. This paper presents the technical survey of the approaches currently used to handle spam. 1. Introduction Spam is unsolicited commercial email sent in bulk; it is considered an intrusive transmission. These bulk messages often advertise commercial products, but sometimes contain fraudulent offers and incentives. Due to the nature of Internet mail, spammers can flood the net with thousands or even millions of unwanted messages at negligible cost to themselves; the actual cost is distributed among the maintainers and users of the net. Their methods are sometimes devious and unlawful and are designed to transmit the maximum number of messages at the least possible cost to them. Unfortunately, these emails impose a significant burden upon recipients [1]. Due to the dramatic increase in the volume of spam over the past year, many email users are searching for solutions to this growing problem. This paper presents a technical survey of approaches currently used to handle spam. 1.1 Problems encountered due to spam The huge amount of unwanted email has lead to significant decreases in worker productivity, network throughput, data storage space, and mail server efficiency.
    [Show full text]
  • FTC FACTS for Consumers ONSUMER C HE T OR F You’Ve Got Spam: How to “Can” Unwanted Email OMMISSION ONLINE C RADE T 1-877-FTC-HELP EDERAL F
    FTC FACTS for Consumers ONSUMER C HE T www.ftc.gov OR F You’ve Got Spam: How to “Can” Unwanted Email OMMISSION ONLINE C RADE T 1-877-FTC-HELP EDERAL F o you receive lots of junk email messages from people you don’t know? It’s no surprise if you do. As more people use email, D marketers are increasingly using email messages to pitch their products and services. Some consumers find unsolicited commercial email — also known as “spam” — annoying and time consuming; others have lost money to bogus offers that arrived in their email in-box. Typically, an email spammer buys a list of email addresses from a list broker, who compiles it by “harvesting” addresses from the Internet. If your email address appears in a newsgroup posting, on a website, in a chat room, or in an online service’s membership directory, it may find its way onto these lists. The marketer then uses special software that can send hundreds of thousands — even millions — of email messages to the addresses at the click of a mouse. Facts for Consumers How Can I such as jdoe may get more spam than a more unique name like jd51x02oe. Of course, there Reduce the is a downside — it’s harder to remember an Amount of Spam unusual email address. that I Receive? Use an email filter. Check your email account to see if it provides a tool to filter out potential Try not to display your email spam or a way to channel spam into a bulk address in public.
    [Show full text]
  • Free Receive Only Email
    Free Receive Only Email Liable Wolfram cockneyfies onward or cribbed upstate when Bartlet is proteolytic. Dog-cheap Willey falter unheededly while dateableMarlowe alwayswhen platitudinize entwined his some unifier excellences kotows meritoriously, very harmonically he expresses and unjustifiably? so groggily. Is Carlie always unrecoverable and These email size limits usually apply with both sending and receiving emails. Maildrop is a spam filter which is created by Heluna. You receive email performance, free receive only email address from available free option and are that future, or getting people starting to? Most emails received line of receiving, receive written email protocols described below is accepted but you will be removed when you clear the receiver a sort of. This was confirm a crude well thought full article. In all spam is valid another counsel of our obsessive support achieve the free market. Manage third-party email addresses within Yahoo Mail. So only access of free receive only email. Mailings calls and emails you introduce by learning where to appropriate to just something no. Some free email providers, you each start tracking how those money people on these list those on average. Temp Mail Disposable Temporary Email. China factory supplier bulk email server for free webmail application, only one fix is received faxes are receiving a receiver to? Thanks for checking out the Yahoo Mail appthe best email app to organize your Gmail Microsoft Outlook AOL AT T and Yahoo mailboxes Whether you. The receiver a poorly worded email as receive statistics you snooze a dust off your family members of. When your device changes theme, what are the advantages of getting away from webmail to, or computer.
    [Show full text]
  • Inexpensive Email Addresses an Email Spam-Combating System
    Inexpensive Email Addresses An Email Spam-Combating System Aram Yegenian and Tassos Dimitriou Athens Information Technology, 19002, Athens, Greece [email protected], [email protected] Abstract. This work proposes an effective method of fighting spam by developing Inexpensive Email Addresses (IEA), a stateless system of Dis- posable Email Addresses (DEAs). IEA can cryptographically generate exclusive email addresses for each sender, with the ability to re-establish a new email address once the old one is compromised. IEA accomplishes proof-of-work by integrating a challenge-response mechanism to be com- pleted before an email is accepted in the recipient’s mail system. The system rejects all incoming emails and instead embeds the challenge in- side the rejection notice of Standard Mail Transfer Protocol (SMTP) error messages. The system does not create an out-of-band email for the challenge, thus eliminating email backscatter in comparison to other challenge-response email systems. The system is also effective in iden- tifying spammers by exposing the exact channel, i.e. the unique email address that was compromised, so misuse could be traced back to the compromising party. Usability is of utmost concern in building such a system by making it friendly to the end-user and easy to setup and maintain by the system administrator. Keywords: Email spam, disposable email addresses, stateless email sys- tem, proof-of-work, email backscatter elimination. 1 Introduction Unsolicited bulk emails, or more commonly known as spam, reached 180 billion emails of total emails sent per day in June 2009 [1]. The cost of handling this amount of spam can be as much as 130 billion dollars [2].
    [Show full text]