Introduction to Biosystematics - Zool 575

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Introduction to Biosystematics - Zool 575 Introduction to Biosystematics - Zool 575 Introduction to Biosystematics Outline Lecture 5 - Nomenclature 1. Naming 2. History 3. Nomenclature vs Taxonomy 4. Rules - ICZN 1 2 Biosystematics Biosystematics - readings Lecture 5: Nomenclature & Classification Mayr, E.& P. D. Ashlock (1991) Principles of Systematic Zoology, 2nd Edition, McGraw-Hill, Inc., NY. pp. 383-406. character identification evolution Smith, H. M. and O. Williams (1970) The salient provisions of the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature: A summary for nontaxonomists. Bioscience, descriptions phylogeny 20: 553-557 **Winston, J. E. (1999) Describing species: Practical Taxonomic Procedure for Biologists. Columbia University Press, NY. pp. 19-40, 407-432. collections classification biogeography Describing species = assigning names to groups (populations) = classification 3 4 Naming Naming Basically a two step process Step 1 - “Is it a new species?” (minimum) 1. Taxonomist finds something thought to 1. Are the diagnostic (unique) characters constant be unnamed, “new” across large samples within the genus? 2. Have you compared the new species with 2. A name is given by publishing descriptions of all its congeners? (globally?) (according to the rules of nomenclature) 3. If the group has not been revised (well), have you at which point the name is introduced to the examined the primary type specimens of literature all congeners? 5 6 1 Introduction to Biosystematics - Zool 575 Naming Naming Step 1 - “Is it a new species?” (better) Comment on uniqueness… 1. Do you have samples large enough to obtain - Early taxonomists dealt mostly with the statistically significant differences in quantitative “obvious” cases - wide phenotypic gaps traits? - Current taxonomists deal more & more with 2. Do you have DNA data that indicates a “gap” exists between the new species and congeners? difficult cases: cryptic species, incipient species, etc. - narrow gaps 3. Do you have data that indicate reproductive barriers exist? (e.g. courtship songs, pheromones) - Taxon dependent (e.g. birds vs insects) 7 8 Naming History of the Code Step 2 - Publishing Linnaean system of binominal nomenclature - See lecture 9 for format of paper - Vast improvement over phrase names and prior naming systems BUT… - Rules of International Code of Zoological Nomenclature must be followed (for - No stability, Linnaeus & users of his system animals) - this lecture would change names to “improve” them (e.g. change the name to better reflect distribution) - Lamarck, 1798, criticized lack of rules, instability, & chaos under the Linnaean 9 system 10 History of the Code History of the Code Problem: no rules to ensure species were Priority - oldest name is used known by a single name - Starting at a fixed date: - Early 1800s exploration of tropics revealed - 1758 - zoology (except spiders in Clerck’s immense & surprising diversity 1757 publication) - 1753 - botany - To stabilize names, in 1813 a Swiss botanist, Augustin Pyramus de Candolle, - Exceptions exist for cases when principle introduced the concept of Priority of priority would result in extreme, if temporary, instability 11 12 2 Introduction to Biosystematics - Zool 575 History of the Code ICZN - goals for the code The first Zoological Code Conflicting goals of taxonomic classification (not nomenclature) - 1843 the “Strickland” code - provide a unique, stable name - Formed by members of the Strickland (ideally, would never change) Commission, including Charles Darwin - provide a natural classification - Revisions resulted in two competing codes (requires constant change as new data reveal new relationships) - A governing body, International Commission for Zoological Nomenclature, 1895 13 14 ICZN - goals for the code Key elements of the ICZN 1. Promote stability (International Code of Zoological Nomenclature) 2. Promote universality 1. Neutrality - doesn’t infringe on taxonomic 3. Names will be unique & distinct judgement - By establishing rules for: 2. Will not solve rank placement problems - Publication - Priority Nomenclature ! Taxonomy - Typification Current Code: edition 4, 1999. 15 16 More Key elements of the ICZN Nomenclature: Provisions for the formation (International Code of Zoological Nomenclature) and use of a system of names (rules) 1. Typification - the name-bearing type, all e.g. nomenclatural status of a name - its names are tied to a type specimen standing in nomenclature, does it conform to the rules? 2. Principle of Priority - oldest name is valid Taxonomy: The theory & practice of 3. Principle of Stability - case by case basis to classifying organisms (opinions) prefer stability over priority (in rare cases) e.g. taxonomic status of a name - is it valid, ICZN regulates names from superfamily to is it unique to one species? 17 subpsecies 18 3 Introduction to Biosystematics - Zool 575 Priority & Stability Priority & Stability Priority works to 1) Recognize first scientist to publish and Nomina oblita (a nomen oblitum) - “forgotten name” - many cases of unknown publications 2) Promote stability because there can only be one “first” publication whereas there an older name not used in over 50 years can be many arguments for “better” can be suppressed as a nomen oblitum if names following the principle of priority would destabilize usage 3) However, there are exceptions… imagine if someone found an older name for Drosophila melanogaster! 19 20 Priority & Stability ICZN Rules Nomina oblita (a nomen oblitum) - “forgotten Failure to follow the rules of proper name” publishing can result in a nomen nudum - a “naked name,” a name that was not e.g. Nicrophorus americanus Olivier 1790 published properly - fails to be established - well known name a nomen nudum is not available Nicrophorus orientalis Herbst 1784 - never used name an available name has been published properly, is available for use as a taxon When invoked the valid name becomes a name nomen protectum 21 22 ICZN Rules - publication ICZN Rules - publication To be available a name must: To be available a name must: 1. Be published in the meaning of article 8 2. Be spelled using only the 26 letters of the 8.1.1 + 8.1.2 + Latin alphabet “8.1.3 it must have been produced in an edition containing simultaneously obtainable copies by a method 3. Be a word (e.g. not ‘cbafdg’) that assures numerous identical and durable copies” Also recommendations (not requirements): Web pages do not assure identical or e.g. do not use unmodified vernacular durable copies (common) names, or offensive names 23 24 4 Introduction to Biosystematics - Zool 575 ICZN Rules - Validity Example of simple synonymy list (the kind you will be creating) Valid name - the single correct, accepted Nicrophorus americanus Olivier, 1790 name for a taxon Synonyms: Silpha (Nicrophorus) orientalis Herbst,1784:77 [nomen oblitum] Many names might be available for a species, Nicrophorus americanus Olivier, 1790:(no. 10):6 but there is only one valid name Nicrophorus virginicus Frölich, 1792:123 Necrophorus grandis Fabricius, 1792a:247 [type: ZMUC, 2 specimens] If there are multiple names for one species Valid name = senior synonym these are synonyms of each other other, invalid synonyms = junior synonyms *Taxonomy tells us which names are Some species, e.g. swan mussel, Anodonta synonyms; nomenclature tells us which cygnea, have hundreds of synonyms (400+) of the synonyms is the valid name* 25 26 Example of bibliographic synonymy list Reading a Synonomy list (table) Nicrophorus insularis Grouvelle, 1893: 161 Type locality: “Sumatra”, Indonesia Methia necydalea (Fabricius) NEW COMBINATION Type depository: MNHN: Paris [!] 1893 Grouvelle: 161 (JA: descriptions in French) >> Orig. comb.: Necrophorus insularis [!] 1903 Portevin: 331 (JA: descriptions in French) >> as valid species 1920 Portevin: 399 (JA: descriptions in French) >> as valid species Saperda necydalea Fabricius, 1798: 148 1922 Portevin: 55 (JA: descriptions in French) >> New syn./status as N. nepalensis var. insularis 1923 Portevin: 307 (JA: key, descriptions in French) >> as N. nepalensis var. insularis 1926a Portevin: 208 (Book: revision: key, descriptions & catalog in French) >> as N. nepalensis var. insularis 1928 Hatch: 129 (Book Chapter: catalog in English) >> as N. nepalensis var. insularis 1964b Hlisnikovsky: 244 (JA: descriptions in German) >> New status as N. nepalensis form insularis [ab. intended?] Saperda necydalina; Fabricius, 1801: 332. Schoenherr, 1975 Emetz & Schawaller: 230 (JA: checklist in German (English summary)) >> as N. nepalensis ab. insularis 1990 Hanski & Niemelä: 149 (Book Chapter: in English) >> New status as valid species 1817:439 UNJUSTIFIED EMENDATION 1991 Hanski & Krikken: 195 (Book Chapter: in English) >> as valid species 2001 Peck: 94 (JA: in English) >> as valid species herein >> desig. lectotype = humeralis Pic, 1917: 2 Methia pusilla; Salle, 1889: 468 (not Newman, 1840). Type locality: “Java” [-from label] Type depository: MNHN: Paris [!] MISIDENTIFICATION 1917a Pic: 2 (JA: descrip. of var. in French) >> Orig. comb.: Necrophorus insularis var. humeralis; auth. attrib. Port. [!] 1920 Portevin: 399 (JA: descriptions in French) >> descrip. of variation: 1 unavailable name 1926a Portevin: 253 (Book: revision: key, descriptions & catalog in French) >> New syn. of N. nepalensis var. insularis 1928 Hatch: 129 (Book Chapter: catalog in English) >> as syn. of N. nepalensis var. insularis 1993 Kozminykh: 67 (JA: key, descriptions, regional in Russian) >> as syn. of N. nepalensis Thia jamaicensis Gahan 1902: 44. NEW SYNONYMY herein >> REVISED
Recommended publications
  • International Code of Zoological Nomenclature
    International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature INTERNATIONAL CODE OF ZOOLOGICAL NOMENCLATURE Fourth Edition adopted by the International Union of Biological Sciences The provisions of this Code supersede those of the previous editions with effect from 1 January 2000 ISBN 0 85301 006 4 The author of this Code is the International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature Editorial Committee W.D.L. Ride, Chairman H.G. Cogger C. Dupuis O. Kraus A. Minelli F. C. Thompson P.K. Tubbs All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means (electronic, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise), without the prior written consent of the publisher and copyright holder. Published by The International Trust for Zoological Nomenclature 1999 c/o The Natural History Museum - Cromwell Road - London SW7 5BD - UK © International Trust for Zoological Nomenclature 1999 Explanatory Note This Code has been adopted by the International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature and has been ratified by the Executive Committee of the International Union of Biological Sciences (IUBS) acting on behalf of the Union's General Assembly. The Commission may authorize official texts in any language, and all such texts are equivalent in force and meaning (Article 87). The Code proper comprises the Preamble, 90 Articles (grouped in 18 Chapters) and the Glossary. Each Article consists of one or more mandatory provisions, which are sometimes accompanied by Recommendations and/or illustrative Examples. In interpreting the Code the meaning of a word or expression is to be taken as that given in the Glossary (see Article 89).
    [Show full text]
  • Dino Cards Project D E F List B
    Daanosaurus Efraasia Dacentrurus Einiosaurus "Dachongosaurus" – nomen nudum Ekrixinatosaurus Daemonosaurus Elachistosuchus – a rhynchocephalian Dahalokely Elaltitan Dakosaurus – a metriorhynchid crocodilian Elaphrosaurus Dakotadon Elmisaurus Dakotaraptor Elopteryx - nomen dubium Daliansaurus Elosaurus – junior synonym of Brontosaurus "Damalasaurus" – nomen nudum Elrhazosaurus Dandakosaurus - nomen dubium "Elvisaurus" – nomen nudum; Cryolophosaurus Danubiosaurus – junior synonym of Struthiosaurus Emausaurus "Daptosaurus" – nomen nudum; early manuscript name for Deinonychus Embasaurus - theropoda incertae sedis Darwinsaurus - possible junior synonym of Huxleysaurus Enigmosaurus Dashanpusaurus Eoabelisaurus Daspletosaurus Eobrontosaurus – junior synonym of Brontosaurus Dasygnathoides – a non-dinosaurian archosaur, junior synonym Eocarcharia of Ornithosuchus Eoceratops – junior synonym of Chasmosaurus "Dasygnathus" – preoccupied name, now known as Dasygnathoides Eocursor Datanglong Eodromaeus Datonglong "Eohadrosaurus" – nomen nudum; Eolambia Datousaurus Eolambia Daurosaurus – synonym of Kulindadromeus Eomamenchisaurus Daxiatitan Eoplophysis - Dinosauria indet. Deinocheirus Eoraptor Deinodon – possibly Gorgosaurus Eosinopteryx - Avialae Deinonychus Eotrachodon Delapparentia - probable junior synonym of Iguanodon Eotriceratops Deltadromeus Eotyrannus Demandasaurus Eousdryosaurus Denversaurus Epachthosaurus Deuterosaurus – a therapsid Epanterias – may be Allosaurus Diabloceratops "Ephoenosaurus" – nomen nudum; Machimosaurus (a crocodilian) Diamantinasaurus
    [Show full text]
  • A Revised Taxonomy of the Iguanodont Dinosaur Genera and Species
    ARTICLE IN PRESS + MODEL Cretaceous Research xx (2007) 1e25 www.elsevier.com/locate/CretRes A revised taxonomy of the iguanodont dinosaur genera and species Gregory S. Paul 3109 North Calvert Station, Side Apartment, Baltimore, MD 21218-3807, USA Received 20 April 2006; accepted in revised form 27 April 2007 Abstract Criteria for designating dinosaur genera are inconsistent; some very similar species are highly split at the generic level, other anatomically disparate species are united at the same rank. Since the mid-1800s the classic genus Iguanodon has become a taxonomic grab-bag containing species spanning most of the Early Cretaceous of the northern hemisphere. Recently the genus was radically redesignated when the type was shifted from nondiagnostic English Valanginian teeth to a complete skull and skeleton of the heavily built, semi-quadrupedal I. bernissartensis from much younger Belgian sediments, even though the latter is very different in form from the gracile skeletal remains described by Mantell. Currently, iguanodont remains from Europe are usually assigned to either robust I. bernissartensis or gracile I. atherfieldensis, regardless of lo- cation or stage. A stratigraphic analysis is combined with a character census that shows the European iguanodonts are markedly more morpho- logically divergent than other dinosaur genera, and some appear phylogenetically more derived than others. Two new genera and a new species have been or are named for the gracile iguanodonts of the Wealden Supergroup; strongly bipedal Mantellisaurus atherfieldensis Paul (2006. Turning the old into the new: a separate genus for the gracile iguanodont from the Wealden of England. In: Carpenter, K. (Ed.), Horns and Beaks: Ceratopsian and Ornithopod Dinosaurs.
    [Show full text]
  • The Monitoring Handbook of Large Freshwater Mussels
    The thick shelled river mussel (Unio crassus) brings LIFE+ back to rivers [UC4LIFE] Målarmusslans återkomst… ACTION A1 DELIVERABLE: “The Monitoring Handbook” The monitoring handbook of large freshwater mussels Jakob Bergengren1, Ted von Proschwitz2, Stefan Lundberg3, Håkan Söderberg4, Oskar Norrgrann4, Martin Österling5 and Ivan Olsson6 County Administrative Board of 1Jönköping 4Västernorrland and 6Skåne, The Natural History Museum in 2Gothenburg and 3Stockholm, and 5Karlstad university and County Administrative Board of Scania6 Action A.1 Deliverable” The monitoring Handbook” Abstract This handbook will be used as part the Life-project “The thick shelled river mussel (Unio crassus) brings LIFE+ back to rivers” [UC4LIFE] monitoring programme to ensure adequate and consistent sampling strategies and techniques amongst the sampling crew. Naturally, the handbook describes sampling strategies and techniques, not only designated for the LIFE- project, but constitute the basis for mussel sampling generally according to standard protocol. Thus, this handbook is based on results from former studies and experiences by the authors and the results have been published previously in different formats. The handbook demonstrate suitable sampling techniques which will be used to survey variables which include mussel population size, density and individual age/size before and after restoration measures (Actions C.1 and C.3 in this project) at the twelve project sites that are planned for in this project. Also, this handbook is relevant for additional project-actions, such as the planning work (Action A.3), Host-fish mapping (Action C.1), Re-introduction and allocation (Action C.3), including all information activities (Actions D.1 - D.7). 1 Action A.1 Deliverable” The monitoring Handbook” Background and objectives Nine species of mussels from the group ”large freshwater mussels” are currently found in Swedish waters.
    [Show full text]
  • Re-Description of the Sauropod Dinosaur Amanzia (“Ornithopsis
    Schwarz et al. Swiss J Geosci (2020) 113:2 https://doi.org/10.1186/s00015-020-00355-5 Swiss Journal of Geosciences ORIGINAL PAPER Open Access Re-description of the sauropod dinosaur Amanzia (“Ornithopsis/Cetiosauriscus”) greppini n. gen. and other vertebrate remains from the Kimmeridgian (Late Jurassic) Reuchenette Formation of Moutier, Switzerland Daniela Schwarz1* , Philip D. Mannion2 , Oliver Wings3 and Christian A. Meyer4 Abstract Dinosaur remains were discovered in the 1860’s in the Kimmeridgian (Late Jurassic) Reuchenette Formation of Moutier, northwestern Switzerland. In the 1920’s, these were identifed as a new species of sauropod, Ornithopsis greppini, before being reclassifed as a species of Cetiosauriscus (C. greppini), otherwise known from the type species (C. stewarti) from the late Middle Jurassic (Callovian) of the UK. The syntype of “C. greppini” consists of skeletal elements from all body regions, and at least four individuals of diferent sizes can be distinguished. Here we fully re-describe this material, and re-evaluate its taxonomy and systematic placement. The Moutier locality also yielded a theropod tooth, and fragmen- tary cranial and vertebral remains of a crocodylomorph, also re-described here. “C.” greppini is a small-sized (not more than 10 m long) non-neosauropod eusauropod. Cetiosauriscus stewarti and “C.” greppini difer from each other in: (1) size; (2) the neural spine morphology and diapophyseal laminae of the anterior caudal vertebrae; (3) the length-to-height proportion in the middle caudal vertebrae; (4) the presence or absence of ridges and crests on the middle caudal cen- tra; and (5) the shape and proportions of the coracoid, humerus, and femur.
    [Show full text]
  • The Giant Pliosaurid That Wasn't—Revising the Marine Reptiles From
    The giant pliosaurid that wasn’t—revising the marine reptiles from the Kimmeridgian, Upper Jurassic, of Krzyżanowice, Poland DANIEL MADZIA, TOMASZ SZCZYGIELSKI, and ANDRZEJ S. WOLNIEWICZ Madzia, D., Szczygielski, T., and Wolniewicz, A.S. 2021. The giant pliosaurid that wasn’t—revising the marine reptiles from the Kimmeridgian, Upper Jurassic, of Krzyżanowice, Poland. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 66 (1): 99–129. Marine reptiles from the Upper Jurassic of Central Europe are rare and often fragmentary, which hinders their precise taxonomic identification and their placement in a palaeobiogeographic context. Recent fieldwork in the Kimmeridgian of Krzyżanowice, Poland, a locality known from turtle remains originally discovered in the 1960s, has reportedly provided additional fossils thought to indicate the presence of a more diverse marine reptile assemblage, including giant pliosaurids, plesiosauroids, and thalattosuchians. Based on its taxonomic composition, the marine tetrapod fauna from Krzyżanowice was argued to represent part of the “Matyja-Wierzbowski Line”—a newly proposed palaeobiogeographic belt comprising faunal components transitional between those of the Boreal and Mediterranean marine provinces. Here, we provide a de- tailed re-description of the marine reptile material from Krzyżanowice and reassess its taxonomy. The turtle remains are proposed to represent a “plesiochelyid” thalassochelydian (Craspedochelys? sp.) and the plesiosauroid vertebral centrum likely belongs to a cryptoclidid. However, qualitative assessment and quantitative analysis of the jaws originally referred to the colossal pliosaurid Pliosaurus clearly demonstrate a metriorhynchid thalattosuchian affinity. Furthermore, these me- triorhynchid jaws were likely found at a different, currently indeterminate, locality. A tooth crown previously identified as belonging to the thalattosuchian Machimosaurus is here considered to represent an indeterminate vertebrate.
    [Show full text]
  • Identifying Freshwater Mussels (Unionoida)
    Identifying freshwater mussels (Unionoida) and parasitic glochidia larvae from host fish gills: a molecular key to the North and Central European species Alexandra Zieritz1, Bernhard Gum1, Ralph Kuehn2 &JuergenGeist1 1Aquatic Systems Biology Unit, Department of Ecology and Ecosystem Management, Technische Universitat¨ Munchen,¨ Muhlenweg¨ 22, 85354 Freising, Germany 2Molecular Zoology Unit, Chair of Zoology, Department of Animal Science, Technische Universitat¨ Munchen,¨ Hans-Carl-von-Carlowitz-Platz 2, 85354 Freising, Germany Keywords Abstract Host–parasite interactions, morphological variability, PCR-RFLP, species identification, Freshwater mussels (order Unionoida) represent one of the most severely endan- Unionidae, wildlife management. gered groups of animals due to habitat destruction, introduction of nonnative species, and loss of host fishes, which their larvae (glochidia) are obligate parasites Correspondence on. Conservation efforts such as habitat restoration or restocking of host popu- Juergen Geist, Aquatic Systems Biology Unit, lations are currently hampered by difficulties in unionoid species identification Department of Ecology and Ecosystem by morphological means. Here we present the first complete molecular identifi- Management, Technische Universitat¨ Munchen,¨ Muhlenweg¨ 22, 85354 Freising, cation key for all seven indigenous North and Central European unionoid species Germany. Tel: +49 (0)8161 713767; and the nonnative Sinanodonta woodiana, facilitating quick, low-cost, and reliable Fax: +49 (0)8161 713477; identification of adult and larval specimens. Application of this restriction frag- E-mail: [email protected] ment length polymorphisms (RFLP) key resulted in 100% accurate assignment of 90 adult specimens from across the region by digestion of partial ITS-1 (where ITS Received: 2 December 2011; Revised: 26 is internal transcribed spacer) polymerase chain reaction (PCR) products in two to January 2012; Accepted: 6 February 2012 four single digestions with five restriction endonucleases.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Genus and Three New Species of Decapodiform Cephalopods (Mollusca: Cephalopoda)
    Rev Fish Biol Fisheries (2007) 17:353-365 DOI 10.1007/S11160-007-9044-Z .ORIGINAL PAPER A new genus and three new species of decapodiform cephalopods (Mollusca: Cephalopoda) R. E. Young • M. Vecchione • C. F, E, Roper Received: 10 February 2006 / Accepted: 19 December 2006 / Pubhshed online: 30 March 2007 © Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007 Abstract We describe here two new species of Introduction oegopsid squids. The first is an Asperoteuthis (Chiroteuthidae), and it is based on 18 specimens. We describe three new species of cephalopods This new species has sucker dentition and a from three different families in two different funnel-mantle locking apparatus that are unique orders that have little in common except they are within the genus. The second new species is a from unusual and poorly known groups. The Promachoteuthis (Promachoteuthidae), and is unique nature of these cephalopods has been based on a unique specimen. This new species known for over 30 years but they were not has tentacle ornamentation which is unique within described because (1) with two species we waited the genus. We also describe a new genus and a new for the collection of more or better material species of sepioid squid in the subfamily Hetero- which never materialized and (2) with one species teuthinae (Sepiolidae) and it is based on four the type material was misplaced, virtually forgot- specimens. This new genus and species exhibits ten and only recently rediscovered. The 2006 unique modifications of the arms in males. CIAC symposium was the stimulus to finally publish these species which should have been Keywords Amphorateuthis alveatus • published in the first CIAC symposium in 1985.
    [Show full text]
  • Biohybrid Entities for Environmental Monitoring Ronald Thenius1, Wiktoria Rajewicz1, Joshua Cherian Varughese1, Sarah Schoenwetter-Fuchs1, Farshad Arvin2, Alexander J
    Biohybrid Entities for Environmental Monitoring Ronald Thenius1, Wiktoria Rajewicz1, Joshua Cherian Varughese1, Sarah Schoenwetter-Fuchs1, Farshad Arvin2, Alexander J. Casson2, Chao Wu2, Barry Lennox2, Alexandre Campo3, Godfried Jansen van Vuuren4, Cesare Stefanini4, Donato Romano4 and Thomas Schmickl1 1University of Graz, Austria, 2The University of Manchester, United Kingdom, 3Universite´ Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium, 4Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna, Pisa, Italy corresponding author: [email protected] Abstract deeper insights into the complex interactions of the chang- Downloaded from http://direct.mit.edu/isal/proceedings-pdf/isal/33/33/1929859/isal_a_00366.pdf by guest on 29 September 2021 ing ecosystems and to be able to have an early detection of In the wake of climate change and water quality crisis, it is disruptive processes, we propose a novel concept in robotics crucial to find novel ways to extensively monitor the envi- ronment and to detect ecological changes early. Biomoni- that allows low budget, long term, autonomous environmen- toring has been found to be an effective way of observing tal monitoring to be executed by biohybrid robots. Apart the aggregate effect of environmental fluctuations. In this pa- from minimising human involvement and/or interaction with per, we outline the development of biohybrids which will au- the ecosystem by using autonomous biohybrid robots, we tonomously observe simple organisms (microorganisms, al- will go a step further by making these robots biodegradable. gae, mussels etc.) and draw conclusions about the state of the water body. These biohybrids will be used for continuous Biodegradability of robots ensures that there is no long-term environmental monitoring and to detect sudden (anthropolog- impact on the monitored system.
    [Show full text]
  • Osteological Revision of the Holotype of the Middle
    Osteological revision of the holotype of the Middle Jurassic sauropod dinosaur Patagosaurus fariasi (Sauropoda: Cetiosauridae) BONAPARTE 1979 Femke Holwerda, Oliver W.M. Rauhut, Pol Diego To cite this version: Femke Holwerda, Oliver W.M. Rauhut, Pol Diego. Osteological revision of the holotype of the Middle Jurassic sauropod dinosaur Patagosaurus fariasi (Sauropoda: Cetiosauridae) BONAPARTE 1979. 2020. hal-02977029 HAL Id: hal-02977029 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02977029 Preprint submitted on 27 Oct 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. 1 Osteological revision of the holotype of the Middle Jurassic sauropod 2 dinosaur Patagosaurus fariasi (Sauropoda: Cetiosauridae) 3 BONAPARTE 1979 4 5 Femke M Holwerda1234, Oliver W M Rauhut156, Diego Pol78 6 7 1 Staatliche Naturwissenscha�liche Sammlungen Bayerns (SNSB), Bayerische Staatssamlung für 8 Paläontologie und Geologie, Richard-Wagner-Strasse 10, 80333 München, Germany 9 10 2 Department of Geosciences, Utrecht University, Princetonlaan, 3584 CD Utrecht, 10 Netherlands 11 12 3 Royal Tyrrell Museum of Palaeontology, Drumheller, AlbertaT0J 0Y0, Canada (current) 13 14 4 Fachgruppe Paläoumwelt, GeoZentrum Nordbayern, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen- 15 Nürnberg, Loewenichstr. 28, 91054 Erlangen, Germany 16 17 5 Department für Umwelt- und Geowissenscha�en, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Richard- 18 Wagner-Str.
    [Show full text]
  • A Census of Dinosaur Fossils Recovered from the Hell Creek and Lance Formations (Maastrichtian)
    The Journal of Paleontological Sciences: JPS.C.2019.01 1 TAKING COUNT: A Census of Dinosaur Fossils Recovered From the Hell Creek and Lance Formations (Maastrichtian). ______________________________________________________________________________________ Walter W. Stein- President, PaleoAdventures 1432 Mill St.. Belle Fourche, SD 57717. [email protected] 605-210-1275 ABSTRACT: A census of Hell Creek and Lance Formation dinosaur remains was conducted from April, 2017 through February of 2018. Online databases were reviewed and curators and collections managers interviewed in an effort to determine how much material had been collected over the past 130+ years of exploration. The results of this new census has led to numerous observations regarding the quantity, quality, and locations of the total collection, as well as ancillary data on the faunal diversity and density of Late Cretaceous dinosaur populations. By reviewing the available data, it was also possible to make general observations regarding the current state of certain exploration programs, the nature of collection bias present in those collections and the availability of today's online databases. A total of 653 distinct, associated and/or articulated remains (skulls and partial skeletons) were located. Ceratopsid skulls and partial skeletons (mostly identified as Triceratops) were the most numerous, tallying over 335+ specimens. Hadrosaurids (Edmontosaurus) were second with at least 149 associated and/or articulated remains. Tyrannosaurids (Tyrannosaurus and Nanotyrannus) were third with a total of 71 associated and/or articulated specimens currently known to exist. Basal ornithopods (Thescelosaurus) were also well represented by at least 42 known associated and/or articulated remains. The remaining associated and/or articulated specimens, included pachycephalosaurids (18), ankylosaurids (6) nodosaurids (6), ornithomimids (13), oviraptorosaurids (9), dromaeosaurids (1) and troodontids (1).
    [Show full text]
  • A Review on Taxonomy of Phylum Kinorhyncha
    Open Journal of Marine Science, 2020, 10, 260-294 https://www.scirp.org/journal/ojms ISSN Online: 2161-7392 ISSN Print: 2161-7384 A Review on Taxonomy of Phylum Kinorhyncha C. Jeeva, P. M. Mohan, P. Ragavan, V. Muruganantham Department of Ocean Studies and Marine Biology, Pondicherry University, Brookshabad Campus, Port Blair, Andaman and Nicobar Islands, India How to cite this paper: Jeeva, C., Mo- Abstract han, P.M., Ragavan, P. and Muruganan- tham, V. (2020) A Review on Taxonomy Kinorhyncha is exclusively marine, holobenthic, free-living, meiofaunal spe- of Phylum Kinorhyncha. Open Journal of cies found in all marine habitats in the world. However, information on geo- Marine Science, 10, 260-294. graphical distribution and taxonomical distributional status of Kinorhyncha https://doi.org/10.4236/ojms.2020.104020 are needed further understanding. This research article presents a compiled, Received: September 10, 2020 up-to-date checklist of the Phylum Kinorhyncha based on bibliographical Accepted: October 27, 2020 survey and revision of taxon names. Present checklist of this phylum com- Published: October 30, 2020 prises 271 species belonging to 30 genera and 13 families. The families are Copyright © 2020 by author(s) and distributed under three orders, Echinorhagata Sørensen et al. 2015, Kentror- Scientific Research Publishing Inc. hagata Sørensen et al. 2015, Xenosomata Zelinka, 1907. Among the 271 valid This work is licensed under the Creative species, in the last five years 82 new species emerged, two new orders and Commons Attribution International three families were described. It also includes nine new genera. This checklist License (CC BY 4.0).
    [Show full text]