Recreation Recommendations for Management of Recreation Lands In· the Susitna Area

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Recreation Recommendations for Management of Recreation Lands In· the Susitna Area SUSI,.IIA AREA PLAII RECREATION RECOMMENDATIONS FOR MANAGEMENT OF RECREATION LANDS IN· THE SUSITNA AREA PREPARED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES: DIVISIONS OF PARKS AND OUTDOOR RECREATION AND LAND AND WATER MANAGEMENT WITH ASSISTANCE FROM THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE JULY 1984 :: HT - 393 .A42 i~ 59433 Vj~ 1984 AI. .. J, ALASKA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES • 555 CORDOVA ST.· ANCHORAGE, AK. 99510 SUSITNA AREA PLAN RECREATION ELEMENT . Chapter I INTRODUCTION. •••• •.• ••••••••••••••••••••••••••• . 1 Chapter II EXISTING USE, VALUE AND MANAGEMENT ISSUES.... 3 Chapter III DEMAND ••••••••• ~ •••••••••••••••••••0. .••••••... 15 Chapter IV SUPPLY OF LAND (RESOURCE BASE) •••••••••••••••• 19 Chapter V SUPPLY/DEMAND ANALySIS •••••••••••••••••••••••• 27 Chapter VI MANAGEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS •••••••••••••••••••• 33 Appendix A SCENIC HIGHWAY DESIGNATION FOR THE GLENN HIGHWAY •••• e._ •••••••••••••••••••••••• ~ •••••••• 55 i I [ LIST OF 'l'ABLES ' I Table 2.1 Standards for Selected Recreation Activities ••••••••• 6 f Table 2.2' Existing Recreation Value............................ 7 Table 2.3 Existing Recreation Demand.~......................... 10 Table 3.1 Projected Recreation Demand for the Year 2000........ 17 Table 3.2 Projected Recreation Value for the Year 2000......... 18 LIST OF MAPS Map 1 Susitna Area Land Management Recommendations for Recreation....................... following I l ii I L CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION A. BACKGROUND The Susitna area contains a wide variety of recreational resources" that provide exceptional opportunities for the public asa result of proximity to population centers and accessibility by means of the Parks, Glenn and Denali highways. The region receives heavy use from a variety of people including both state and local residents and a large number of tourists from outside of Alaska. Tourism, as an income generating industry, is second only to oil and gas in the state and is an important part of the economy of the study area. In 1977 , more than 500,000 people spent nearly 370 million dollars traveling to, from, and within Alaska. 1 Over 75 percent of those visitors entered the state partly for pleasure, e.g. sightseeing, camping, hiking, fishing, and so forth, and 55 percent came solely for this purpose. The most frequently visited places in the state by non-residents included Anchorage (358,300 visitors), Fairbanks (174,000 visitors), and Denali National Park (120,200 visitors). A large number of visitors pass through the study area en route to special interest areas such as Denali and Fairbanks. The prospects for increased recreational use of the study area are great, especially as increased access opens up currently remote regions. Although there are presently large amounts of public land available for recreational use, changes in land ownership and development are expected to alter the area's traditional recreational land base. As pressure to develop land for other uses continues to grow, land use conflicts will occur. It is these conflicts that represent the major issue in the region - growing populations in the borough and Anchorage both increase the need for recreation lands and decrease (through development) the land base from which that need can be met. The element presented here will examine this issue as it relates to recreation resources; scenic and heritage resources; and unique natural features. B. FUNCTION OF THE ELEMENT The recreation element is designed to provide an overall view of the supply of, demand for and value of recreational resources in the Susitna study area. The element also constitutes an advocacy statement by the Division of Parks and Outdoor Recreation (DPOR) indicating how they would prefer recreation resources to be managed in the study area. These management recommendations, together with related information about other resources, will be used to formulate land allocations and management guidelines for public land in the study area. 1Susitna River Basin Study-Alaska, Willow Subbasin, U.S. Department of Agriculture, 1981. 1 { C. ORGANIZATION/CONTENTS This report contains six chapters. The introduction (this chapter) states the purpose of the report and. how it relates to the overall planning process. Chapter II describes historical and existing recreational activity and the economic significance of this activity to both local and other state residents. In addition, a discussion of the major management issues pertaining to recreational use is included. Chapter III addresses future (year 2000) demand for recreational opportunities from local, regional and national perspectives, and provides an estimate of the land necessary to accommodate this demand. The fourth chapter describes the current supply of recreational resources within the study area in terms of available recreational land and facilities. This information is presented in graphic (mapped) as well as narrative form. Chapter V draws on information from the previous 2 chapters and from the economic assessment presented in this chapter to reach conclusions concerning the desirability and feasibility of meeting recreation demand. These conclusions serve as the basis for near and long term management recommendations. Chapter r VI is a summary of these recommendations in terms of recreation goals L and objectives, management guidelines and programs. f I L ti I L 2 CHAPTER II EXISTING USE t VALUE t AND MANAGEMENT ISSUES A. INTRODUCTION This chapter discusses historical and existing recreational use and the value of that use in the study area. It also identifies management issues that are of maj or importance and will be addressed in terms of policies and guidelines in the planning process. The description of existing use is based on data compiled by the U. S. Dept. of Agriculture t Soil Conservation Service (SCS). The Division of Parks and Outdoor Recreation (DPOR) in conjunction with the SCS conducted a recreation study. designed to estimate the amount of . recreational use occurring in the study area as well as the economic value of that use to participants. The SCS used participation rates based on a statewide DPOR public· outdoor recreation survey in which people were asked how many times per year they participated in various activities. These rates are set forth in the· 1981 Alaska Outdoor Recreation Plan. This survey has general information on the average number of "occasions". each adult participates in certain recreational activities. "Occasions t " when translated into user dayst provide an estimate of the total user days per year spent by residents in the study area. The information is a function of distance between the participants' homes and the location of the activity. .Information on the particular sites where residents are recreating is not available. Consequently, the resulting figures are regionaJ estimates and are not the equivalent of tallying up the actual number of picnickers at a particular site on the Glenn Highway. For example, estimates provided by DPOR indicate that the typical adult resident of the region spends 5 days per year cross-country skiingt most of which occurs within four driving hours from the person's residence. Using the participation rates provided by DPOR, the SCS prepared a demand assessment and economic evaluation of the following seven recreational activities in the Susitna study area: picnicking, tent camping, recreational vehicle (RV) camping, hiking with a pack, ctoss-country skiing, snowmobilingt and canoeingjkayaking. Although . these activities represent only a small portion of those available to Alaskans, they are among the most common and account for a large percentage of use in terms of total visitor days. It is important to note that by limiting the evaluation to only seven activities, the total value of recreation benefits attributable to a particular site or area cannot be derived from the analysis. Tl1e remainder of this cha.pter contains information generated on the existing level of use (usetdays) and economic significance of that use. Additional background on the methodology used is provided in section C of this chapter. Figures for projected future demand for these 7 recreational activities can be found in Chapter III. 3 In addition to the above activities, hunting (big game, small game and waterfowl) and fishing were examined; these activities are discussed as part, of the fish and wildlife element. B. HISTORICAL USE The Susitna study. area is one with dramatic contrasts in terrain and climate, encompassing elements of both interior and coastal Alaska. Rugged mountains and glaciers can be found adjacent to gently sloping, wooded valleys and areas with heavy precipitation occur near dry, rain-shadowed valleys. Recreational resources in the Susitna study area are as abundant and varied as anywhere in the state. Human use of these resources has traditionally been concentrated along the major road systems and at popular fly-in areas. Road accessible areas are especially important for picnicking and RV camping. Waterways, particularly clearwater r rivers in proximity to existing roads, have significant value for L fishing and boating. The many mountainous areas adjacent to transportation corridors also provide excellent opportunities for r hiking, climbing, hunting, wildlife viewing and other activities. l Historical factors have contributed .to the current pattern of recreational use in the study area. In the early 1900s, the southern Talkeetna Mountains were extensively explored for precious metals and later several other areas were actively
Recommended publications
  • Field-Trip Guide to Volcanic and Volcaniclastic Deposits of the Lower Jurassic Talkeetna Formation, Sheep Mountain, South-Central Alaska
    Field-Trip Guide to Volcanic and Volcaniclastic Deposits of the Lower Jurassic Talkeetna Formation, Sheep Mountain, South-Central Alaska U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2006-1124 Field-Trip Guide to Volcanic and Volcaniclastic Deposits of the Lower Jurassic Talkeetna Formation, Sheep Mountain, South-Central Alaska Amy E. Draut U.S. Geological Survey, Pacific Science Center, Santa Cruz, CA 95060 Peter D. Clift School of Geosciences, University of Aberdeen, AB24 3UE, U.K. Robert B. Blodgett U.S. Geological Survey–Contractor, Anchorage, AK 99508 U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Open-File Report 2006-1124 2006 U.S. Department of the Interior P. Lynn Scarlett, Acting Secretary U.S. Geological Survey P. Patrick Leahy, Acting Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia 2006 Revised and reprinted: 2006 Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government To download a copy of this report from the World Wide Web: http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2006/1124/ For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted material contained within this report. LIST OF FIGURES FIGURE 1. Regional map of the field-trip area. FIGURE 2. Geologic cross section through Sheep Mountain. FIGURE 3. Stratigraphic sections on the south side of Sheep Mountain.
    [Show full text]
  • The Glenn Highway EMBODIES ALL SIX QUALITIES of a SCENIC BYWAY
    The Glenn Highway EMBODIES ALL SIX QUALITIES OF A SCENIC BYWAY. Scenic Historic Cultural Natural Recreational Archaeological This resource This resource Evidence and Those features of Outdoor Those offers a heightened encompasses expressions of the the visual recreational characteristics of visual experience legacies of the past customs or environment that activities are the scenic byways derived from the that are distinctly traditions of a are in a relatively directly associated corridor that are view of natural associated with distinct group of undisturbed state. with and physical evidence and man made physical elements people. Cultural These features dependent upon of historic or elements of the of the landscape, features include, predate the arrival the natural and prehistoric human visual environment whether natural or but are not limited of human cultural elements life or activity that of the scenic man made, that to crafts, music, populations and of the corridor’s are visible and byway corridor. are of such dance, rituals, may include landscape. capable of being The characteristics significance that festivals, speech, geological The recreational inventoried and of the landscape they educate the food, special formations, fossils, activities provide interpreted. The are strikingly viewer and stir an events, vernacular landform, water opportunities for scenic byway distinct and offer a appreciation of the architecture, etc. bodies, vegetation, active and passive corridor’s pleasing and most past. The historic and are currently and wildlife. There recreational archaeological memorable visual elements reflect practiced. The may be evidence of experiences. They interest, as experience. All the actions of cultural qualities of human activity but include, but are not identified through elements of the people and may the corridor could the natural features limited to downhill ruins, artifacts, landscape – include buildings, highlight one or reveal minimal skiing, rafting, structural remains landform, water, settlement more significant disturbances.
    [Show full text]
  • Hawkwatch Is in South-Central One Would Expect Spring Migrants in North Amer - Alaska (See Map, P
    Paul Fritz Cecily Fritz Palmer, Alaska Urbana, Maryland [email protected] [email protected] 30 BIRDING • JANUARY 2011 nless you are an avid hawk watcher or you follow Alaska birding, you prob - ably have never heard of the Gunsight Mountain Hawk Watch. Although relatively unknown, Gunsight’s spring hawk migration has grabbed the at - tention of an increasing number of raptor enthusiasts because of the rich array of Red-tailed and Rough-legged hawk plumages it offers. And from an Alaskan per - spective, Gunsight is likely the most reliable spot in the state to see Swainson’s Hawks, rare in Alaska. Gunsight is the only known site in the state where Swain - son’s is seen often enough to garner a “rare” status as opposed to “casual” or “accidental.” What makes the area even more enticing is the percentage of reflected light (albedo) from the consistent snow cover. With new snowfall, albedo can exceed 90%, although it’s more generally in the 40–50% range—still wonderful lighting conditions, considering that other surfaces reflect 10% or less of the sunlight. Even on a cloudy day, watchers and photographers enjoy excel - lent conditions for observation of fine details and for raptor-in-flight pho - tography. WWW.ABA.ORG 31 GUNSIGHT MOUNTAIN whereas, for instance, in the Himalayas and other mountainous areas, the plateau is relatively high. In 1995, the well-known mountain climber Gerry Roach reported seeing Denali from the summit of Mt. Sanford, an astounding distance of more than 225 miles. Gunsight nfrequent Alaskan hawk counts have Mountain is the been conducted north of Gunsight, place to see a Harlan’s but only two regularly staffed hawk Hawk .
    [Show full text]
  • GROWTH POTENTIAL, DEVELOPMENT ISSUES, SETTLEMENT Palterns
    , 1MATANUSKA·SUSITNA BOROUGH COMPREHENSIVE V- PLANNING PROGRAM GROWTH POTENTIAL, DEVELOPMENT ISSUES, SETTLEMENT PAlTERNS VOLUME20F2 HT .TANUSKA·SUSITNA·BELUGA COOPERATIVE PLANNING PROGRAM 393 .A42 M383 1982 MAY 1982 v.2 Prepared by: DOWL ENGINEERS For the: MATANUSKA·SUSITNA BOROUGH \ paWL Engineers 4040 "0" Street Anchorage, Alaska 99503 Phone (907) 2711-1551 (Telecopier (907) 272-5742) May 17, 1982 W.O. #013421 Dear Citizen: The Matanuska-Susitna Borough is on the threshold of growth that may be unprecedented in Alaska in terms of long term expansion of economic base. The number of private and State governmental activities and proposed projects which are getting underway or on the horizon can be expected to exert substantial influence on the future growth and character of the Borough. They include: o Capital move to Willow o Knik Arm Crossing o State land Disposals o large Scale Agricultural Development o Expanded Development of Mineral Resources o Susitna Hydro Projects o Port MacKenzie Industrial Development As evidenced by the construction of the trans-Alaska oil pipeline, major economic "booms" can quickly turn into "busts."."leaving behind crippled. economies. The activities and projects listed above, i'lave the potential to significantly impact existing development and lifestyles. By anticipating these impacts with proper planning, the Matanuska-Susitna Borough's economy can grow, diversify, and prosper. The "boom/bust" cycle can give way to a healthy stable economy, an economy that can preserve existing lifestyles while allowing desirable uniform growth. In order for this "healthy" growth to occur, the decisions that are made by business, government and private individuals must be based upon sound information, public awareness, and planning.
    [Show full text]
  • GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 1148 Early Jurassic Ammonites from Alaska
    GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 1148 Early Jurassic Ammonites from Alaska By RALPH W. IMLAY GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 1148 Studies of Early Jurassic ammonites from Alaska provide close correlations with Lower Jurassic ammonite zones in Europe and with ammonite successions elsewhere in the world UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1981 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR JAMES G. WATT, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Doyle G. Frederick, Acting Director Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Imlay, Ralph Willard, 1908- Early Jurassic ammonites from Alaska. (Geological Survey professional paper ; 1148) Bibliography: p. Supt. of Docs, no.: I 19.16:1148 Includes index. 1. Ammonoidea. 2. Paleontology Jurassic. 3. Paleontology Alaska. I. Title. II. Series. QE807.A51585 564'.53 81-607901 AACR2 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 CONTENTS Page Abstract _____________________________________________——— 1 Introduction ______________________________________________ 2 Biologic analysis ___________________________________________ 2 Biostratigraphic summary _____________________________________ 4 Northern Alaska _________________________________________ 4 East-central Alaska ________________________________________ 6 Southern Alaska _________________________________——————— 7 Wrangell Mountains _____________________________________ 7 Talkeetna Mountains ____________________________________ 7 Chulitna River area _____________________________________
    [Show full text]
  • Glenn Highway NSB Interpretive Plan
    Interpretive Plan Prepared by Alaska Division of Parks and Outdoor Recreation, Interpretation and Education. Prepared for Glenn Highway National Scenic Byway Organization. Summer 2006 GHNSB OVERVIEW MAP Table of Contents GHNSB OVERVIEW MAP . i EXECUTIVE SUMMARY . iv INTRODUCTION . 1 • Purpose of the Plan . 1 • Background . 2 • Planning Process . 4 • Goals and Objectives . 5 - Glenn Highway National Scenic Byway Partnership Board Goals . 5 - Interpretive Plan Goals and Objectives . 5 • Mission and Vision Statements . 8 OVERVIEW OF RESOURCES . 9 INTERPRETIVE THEMES . 16 VISITOR EXPERIENCE GOALS . 20 EXISTING VISITOR EXPERIENCE . 22 • Information and Orientation . 22 • Interpretation and Education . 23 AUDIENCE ANALYSIS . 27 PROPOSED INTERPRETIVE SITES AND SERVICES . 34 • Informational/Interpretive Materials and Services . 34 • Implementation Priorities for Site-Specific Interpretive Projects . 38 • Site-Specific Interpretive Projects Map . insert • Site-Specific Interpretive Projects . 41 DESIGN GUIDELINES . 88 PARAMETERS AND CONSIDERATIONS . 94 EVALUATION . 96 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS . 98 APPENDICES . 99 • Appendix A: Summary of Public Comments . 99 • Appendix B: Mile by Mile Resource Inventory . 101 • Appendix C: Sample Design Standards . 115 • Appendix D: Evaluative Techniques for Interpretive Services . 122 • Appendix E: References . 125 Contents iii Executive Summary Executive Summary The Glenn Highway National Scenic Byway winds 137 .5 miles from Anchorage, Alaska’s largest city, through the glacially sculpted Matanuska River Valley, and empties into the expansive Copper River Basin . Stories about the Byway’s cultural and natural history are hidden in the towns and landscapes along the way . Several existing sites including businesses, nature centers, and waysides do a wonderful job sharing Byway stories with travelers . However, existing interpretation reveals only a fraction of the Byway’s significance.
    [Show full text]
  • George Darrow Slides, B2019.006
    REFERENCE CODE: AkAMH REPOSITORY NAME: Anchorage Museum at Rasmuson Center Bob and Evangeline Atwood Alaska Resource Center 625 C Street Anchorage, AK 99501 Phone: 907-929-9235 Fax: 907-929-9233 Email: [email protected] Guide prepared by: Sara Piasecki, Archivist TITLE: George Darrow Slides COLLECTION NUMBER: B2019.006 OVERVIEW OF THE COLLECTION Dates: circa 1973-2010 Extent: 4 boxes; 0.8 linear feet Language and Scripts: The collection is in English. Name of creator(s): George Darrow Administrative/Biographical History: George Darrow (1939- ) came to Alaska with the Air Force in 1973 and was stationed at Elmendorf Air Force Base. There, he was assigned to the 1931st Communications Group--Radio Maintenance, with a temporary duty assignment to Shemya from November 1974-February 1975. After retiring from service in 1978, Darrow held a variety of jobs in Anchorage, the longest with the Department of Veterans Affairs, from which he retired in 2005.1 Scope and Content Description: The collection consists of 743 color 35mm slides taken by Darrow during his time in Alaska. Early images include photographs taken by Darrow at various military communications sites. Later images primarily depict Darrow’s outdoor recreation activities and trips around the state. For more information, see Detailed Description of Collection. Arrangement: Arranged by subject and date, when known. 1 Darrow, George R. The memoirs of an average guy. [Place of publication not identified] : [publisher not identified], [2007]. CONDITIONS GOVERNING ACCESS AND USE Restrictions on Access: The collection is open for research use. Physical Access: Original items in good condition. Technical Access: No special equipment is needed to access the materials.
    [Show full text]
  • Birding in Mat-Su
    !"#$"%&'"%'()*+,-' ' PALMER HAY FLATS STATE GAME REFUGE Where: Primary access is from Hayfield Road via Knik-Goose Bay Rd. From Wasilla take Knik -Goose Bay Rd 4.1 mile. Turn left on Fairview Loop Rd. Go 1.9 miles. Go straight ahead onto Hayfield Rd From the Parks Hwy: Take the Hyer Rd exit to Fairview Loop Road. (From the west - Wasilla area turn right onto E. Fireweed Lane, then take first left onto Fairview Loop Rd. Coming from Anchorage/Palmer area turn left onto Hyer Rd, go under the Parks Highway, turn right onto E. Fireweed Rd, then take the first left onto Fairview Loop Rd). Continue 9 miles. Turn left onto Hayfield Rd. Follow Hayfield Road about 1.3 miles. You will see Lucy Lake Road ion the right, the Hay Flats access road on the left, and a Palmer Hay Flats Refuge sign on the right. Drive 0.4 miles down the access road to the parking lot. What: This estuary is one of the most productive waterfowl stopover and nesting areas accessible in south central Alaska. It is an important migratory stopover for large numbers of ducks, geese, swans and Sandhill Cranes, as well as shorebirds. A variety of raptors such as Northern Harrier, Rough- legged Hawk and Short-eared Owl can be seen regularly during migration with some nesting as well. Warblers, sparrows, longspurs, thrushes and other songbirds also frequent the area. Some species that occur in the Hay Flats have special conservation status including Trumpeter Swan and Rusty Blackbird. International BirdLife and National Audubon Society nominated the Refuge as an Important Bird Area (IBA).
    [Show full text]
  • Alaska's Highways and Byways
    Alaska’s Highways and Byways Media Information Driving Alaska The 49th State Looks Great from Behind the Wheel By Melissa DeVaughn I remember the first time I drove across the Canadian border into Alaska, with visions of life on the Last Frontier flooding my brain. The sun shone, and the temperature was a scorching 80 degrees, a far cry from the frozen land I expected. A huge “Welcome to Alaska” monument stood on the border separating Canada’s Yukon at Beaver Creek from Alaska on the Alaska Highway. I stopped the truck, got out and gave it a look. Technically, not a thing was different from the ground I was standing on now versus that of the land across which I just drove. But psychologically, it meant all the difference in the world. I would have years to explore the rest of Alaska on foot, dog sled and skis, but on this fine July morning, I had the open road. Seeing what Alaska has to offer behind the wheel of an automobile or RV is an unforget- table experience. Alaska is a huge state, so driving offers a chance to see more in less time from the comfort of a car or RV. This doesn’t mean you’ll be cruising along at a steady 65 mph. On the contrary, Alaska’s roads require thoughtful, planned travel. Some roads are little more than gravel paths over mountain passes. Some are wide, four-lane affairs with lots of amenities along the way. And most are something in between, well tended but modest.
    [Show full text]
  • Paul Fritz Cecily Fritz Palmer, Alaska Urbana, Maryland [email protected] [email protected]
    Paul Fritz Cecily Fritz Palmer, Alaska Urbana, Maryland [email protected] [email protected] 30 BIRDING • JANUARY 2011 nless you are an avid hawk watcher or you follow Alaska birding, you prob - ably have never heard of the Gunsight Mountain Hawk Watch. Although relatively unknown, Gunsight’s spring hawk migration has grabbed the at - tention of an increasing number of raptor enthusiasts because of the rich array of Red-tailed and Rough-legged hawk plumages it offers. And from an Alaskan per - spective, Gunsight is likely the most reliable spot in the state to see Swainson’s Hawks, rare in Alaska. Gunsight is the only known site in the state where Swain - son’s is seen often enough to garner a “rare” status as opposed to “casual” or “accidental.” What makes the area even more enticing is the percentage of reflected light (albedo) from the consistent snow cover. With new snowfall, albedo can exceed 90%, although it’s more generally in the 40–50% range—still wonderful lighting conditions, considering that other surfaces reflect 10% or less of the sunlight. Even on a cloudy day, watchers and photographers enjoy excel - lent conditions for observation of fine details and for raptor-in-flight pho - tography. WWW.ABA.ORG 31 GUNSIGHT MOUNTAIN whereas, for instance, in the Himalayas and other mountainous areas, the plateau is relatively high. In 1995, the well-known mountain climber Gerry Roach reported seeing Denali from the summit of Mt. Sanford, an astounding distance of more than 225 miles. Gunsight nfrequent Alaskan hawk counts have Mountain is the been conducted north of Gunsight, place to see a Harlan’s but only two regularly staffed hawk Hawk .
    [Show full text]
  • A ©Lonely Planet Publications Pty Ltd
    ©Lonely Planet Publications Pty Ltd Alaska Heritage Museum 155 Alaska State Troopers 372 Alaska Hwy 71-2, 287, 304-7, 376, Alaska Tribal Cache 249 433 379, 420 Alaska Vistas 95 Alaska Indian Arts Center 135 Alaska Wild Berry Park 161 Alaska Islands & Ocean Visitor Alaska Zoo 160 Center 241 Alaska-Canada Military Hwy, see Alaska king crabs 326, 335 Alaska Hwy Alaska Marine Highway 20, 40, 44, Alaskan Brewing Company 129 118, 149, 336 Alava Bay 54 Alaska Marine Highway ferry 7, 8, albatross 408 18, 336, 7 Albert Loop Trail 183 Alaska Maritime National Wildlife Alcan, the 71-2, 287, 304-7, 376, Refuge 392 379, 420 A Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act Aleut People 326, 350, 376, 388 AB Mountain 146 350, 380 Aleutian Islands 7, 343-8, 378, 7 Abercrombie, Captain WR 194, 314 Alaska Native Heritage Center 13, accommodations 346 accommodations 17, 410-11, see also 155, 175, 386, 13 individual regions Alaska Native Medical 156 food 347 B&Bs 410 Alaska Natives 13, 47, 375, 385-90, hiking 346 cabins 31, 79, 97, 83 395, 387, 390 paddling 346 camping 21, 30-2, 411 Alaska Indian Arts Center 135 Aleutian Range 391 caravan parks 411 Alaska Native Heritage Center 13, Aleutian WWII Visitor Center 345 children, with 43-4 155, 175, 386, 13, 169, 388 Alone in the Wilderness 372 hostels 411 Aleut People 326, 350, 376, 388 Alpine Historical Park 313 hotels 411 Alutiiq People 214-55, 388 Alpine Ridge Trail 253-4 motels 411 art & crafts 13, 87, 135, 386-8, 13, Alutiiq Museum & Archaeological Repository 327 wilderness cabins 42, 46, 79, 109, 385, 386 121, 205,
    [Show full text]
  • Selected Quotes from Shem Pete's Alaska 2016 Proto-Dene Lex Loci P
    selected quotes from Shem Pete's Alaska 2016 Proto-Dene Lex Loci p. 14 xii p. 14 MAP 9 Hydronymic districts in Northern Athabascan languages. River is at Delta River and Goodpaster River. Kari 1996a:463: ‡The hydronymic district was the first key concept for Kari’s “the na’/ niq’ innovation is only one piece of evidence of the theory of Dene prehistory “The Proto-Dene Lex Loci” (‘word/ gradual westward/ downstream expansion of the Athabaskans law of location’, or PDLL) that is introduced on pp. 144–147. into western and Southcentral Alaska. The Tanana River, with Some concepts presented in Kari 1996a, 1996c, and 2010b that four [to five] smallish language areas gives every indication of are central to the PDLL theory are hydronymic districts (seven having been the ancient center of Northern Athabaskan culture.” regional terms for ‘stream’ in Northern Dene languages), reverse Also introduced on p. 144 is the PDLL term watershed tenure hydronymns (use of a minor hydronymn to highlight streams such that includes hydronymic districts and several other pragmatic/ as -niq’ instead of -na’ in Western Alaska), and oronymic districts intentional place naming devices that are detectable in Alaska (where PA *dz ł ‘mountain’ shifts to *d ghilayi south and west of Dene place names. the Alaska Range, see. 7.61). The hydronym niq’ literally means ‘on MAP BY JAMES KARI AND DIXON JONES the upstream’. The na’/ niq’ hyronymn boundary on the Tanana INTRODUCTION 39 ‡Introducing the Proto-Dene Lex Loci with Selected Dene Place Names South and West of the Alaska Range by James Kari For further study on PDLL refer to discussions and examples on pages xii, 14, 39, 141, 154, 214–215, 217, 221–222, 227–229, and 309.
    [Show full text]