Reaction Pathways for Catalytic Gas-Phase Oxidation of Glycerol Over Mixed Metal Oxides W

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Reaction Pathways for Catalytic Gas-Phase Oxidation of Glycerol Over Mixed Metal Oxides W Catalysis – Innovative Applications in Petrochemistry and Refining DGMK Conference October 4-6, 2011, Dresden, Germany Reaction Pathways for Catalytic Gas-Phase Oxidation of Glycerol over Mixed Metal Oxides W. Suprun, R. Gläser, H. Papp Institute of Chemical Technology, Universität Leipzig, Germany Abstract Glycerol as a main by-product from bio-diesel manufacture is a cheap raw material with large potential for chemical or biochemical transformations to value-added C3-chemicals. One possible way of glycerol utilization involves its catalytic oxidation to acrylic acid as an alternative to petrochemical routes. However, this catalytic conversion exhibits various problems such as harsh reaction conditions, severe catalyst coking and large amounts of undesired by-products. In this study, the reaction pathways for gas-phase conversion of glycerol over transition metal oxides (Mo, V und W) supported on TiO2 and SiO2 were investigated by two methods: (i) steady state experiments of glycerol oxidation and possible reactions intermediates, i.e., acrolein, 3-hydroxy propionaldehyde and acetaldehyde, and (ii) temperature-programmed surface reaction (TPSR) studies of glycerol conversion in the presence and in the absence of gas-phase oxygen. It is shown that the supported W- , V and Mo-oxides possess an ability to catalyze the oxidation of glycerol to acrylic acid. These investigations allowed us to gain a deeper insight into the reaction mechanism. Thus, based on the obtained results, three possible reactions pathways for the selective oxidation of glycerol to acrylic acid on the transition metal-containing catalysts are proposed. The major pathways in presence of molecular oxygen are a fast successive destructive oxidation of glycerol to COx and the dehydration of glycerol to acrolein which is a rate-limiting step Introduction Glycerol is the main by-product of transesterification of vegetable oils for the production of bio-diesel. Currently, about 1,2 Mio. t/a of raw glycerol is produced in the EU-countries. The massive increase in the bio-diesel production goes hand in hand with the availability of large amounts of crude glycerol, which must be valorised. An economical study has shown that a competitive production of acrylic acid from glycerol may be possible if the price of glycerol would be less than 300 US$/t [1]. In 2010 refined glycerol still had a price of 450 to 500 US$/t. But crude glycerol was only around 80 to 100 US $/t. This makes crude glycerol a potentially very competitive raw material for the production of basic and fine chemicals. The catalytic dehydration of glycerol to acrolein, acetol and/or hydrogenolysis to propanediols was intensively investigated at the last decade [2], but literature about a conversion of glycerol to acrylic acid without intermediates is very limited. The synthesis of acrylic acid is currently based on the selective oxidation of acrolein or propene over complex multicomponent Mo-based catalyst. Titania and silica are suitable catalyst supports for selective gas-phase conversion of hydrocarbons to carboxylic acids. As part of our ongoing research for the catalytic conversion of glycerol [3, 4], we have studied the catalytic behaviour of catalysts containing Mo, V and W oxides supported on titania and silica in absence and presence of oxygen. The presented work is aimed to clarify the role of transition metal oxide components and some reaction intermediates for dehydration and/or selective oxydehydration of glycerol. DGMK-Tagungsbericht 2011-2, ISBN 978-3-941721-17-3 253 Catalysis – Innovative Applications in Petrochemistry and Refining Experimental Titania and silica catalysts loaded with Mg, Mo, W and V oxides were prepared by impregnation of precursors with aqueous solutions of magnesium nitrate, ammonium methavanadate, ammonium tungstate and ammonium molibdate. The following commercial 2 precursors were used: TiO2 (Millenium; BET 77 m /g) and SiO2 (Köstropur 050612: CWK 2 Bad Köstritz; BET: 305 m /g). The preparation of Ti-PO4 and Ti-Mo-W-V-PO4 catalysts was carried out by simultaneous impregnation of TiO2 with aqueous solutions of the corresponding metal salts and phosphoric acid. The impregnated samples were dried at 110 °C and calcined in air for 4 h at 450 °C. The atomic relation between metal, titania or silica was kept constant, i.e.: M:Ti or M:Si = 1:10 and Ti / PO4 = 12:1. The catalyst composition and notation of the prepared samples are listed in Tab.1. Textural properties were determined by adsorption–desorption isotherms of N2 using an ASAP 2010 apparatus (Micromeritics). Powder XRD patterns were recorded on a Bruker D8- Advance X–ray diffractometer using a nickel-filtered Cu Ka (0.15418 nm) source at 40 kV and 50 mA. Temperature programmed reduction of catalyst samples was carried out with a H2/Ar- mixture on an AMI 100 (Altamira) instrument equipped with a TCD detector. The catalysts were pretreated in a nitrogen flow at 300 °C for 30 min and after that cooled down to 30°C. The H2-TPR measurements were recorded from 30 to 700 °C in a H2/Ar flow (5 vol% H2; 50 ml min−1, heating rate: 10 K min−1). Catalytic tests for dehydration and oxidation of glycerol were carried out in a continuous flow fixed–bed reactor at atmospheric pressure. Aqueous solution of glycerol (5 wt%) was injected using a liquid flow controller and then evaporated at 200 °C (Bronkhorst) prior to entering the reactor. The concentrations of glycerol and water in the gas-feed were 0.18 vol% and 12 vol%, respectively. The product samples were analyzed by GC (Chrompack 9001) equipped with a capillary column (OPTIMA–WAX, 30 m MN) and −1 an FID detector: TP: 100 °C (2 min), 12 K min , 245 °C (5 min). Additionally CO and CO2 were analysed on-line using the FTIR Gas–Analyser 1301 (INNOVA). Results and discussion Textural properties and total acidity of the investigated catalysts are presented in Table 1. The specific surface area decreased after impregnation, especially for catalysts loaded with Tab. 1 Physico-chemical properties of catalysts loaded with transition metal oxides . Specific BET area Average pore Total acidity 2 Catalyst (m /g) diameter (Å) mmolNH3/g Support TiO2 SiO2 TiO2 SiO2 TiO2 SiO2 Mo 74 275 83 114 415 355 W 73 - 79 - 468 - Mg 71 - 86 - 65 - Mo-W 68 245 87 132 522 434 Mo-V 64 215 85 125 502 448 Mo-W-V 52 204 86 150 565 460 Mo-W-V-PO4 48 195 105 135 675 524 two or three metal oxides. The average pore diameter decreased after impregnation of TiO2 from 127 to ~75 Å and SiO2 from 150 to ~115 Å. All XRD patterns (Fig. 1) show intense peaks at a 2θ region of 20-35 corresponding to the metal oxides i.e: MoO3, V2O5, and WO3 and prove that the structure of the amorphous silica and crystalline anatase titania was not changed or destroyed during calcination at 450°C. Reflexes typical for molybdenum, vanadium and tungsten oxides indicate that the metal oxides were successfully introduced. No differences were observed between crystalline phase of mixed metal oxide Mo-W-V and samples additionally loaded with phosphoric acid. This indicated that no metal phosphates, 254 DGMK-Tagungsbericht 2011-2 Catalysis – Innovative Applications in Petrochemistry and Refining e.g., heteropolyacids (i.e. HPWO, HPMoO or HPVO) were formed during the impregnation in presence of phosphoric acid or calcination. It is generally accepted that the catalytic activity in the dehydration of glycerol is related to the catalyst acidity [2]. Therefore, TPD of ammonia were performed for all catalysts to characterize their total acidic properties. Tab. 1 shows that the incorporation of W-, V- and Mo-oxide led to an increased acidity. In contrast, the total acidity of titania loaded with Mg- oxide decreased which indicated basic properties of the TiO2-MgO systems. o V b a x Mo * W * * * * Ti-W Si-Mo-W x Ti-Mo-W Si-Mo o Ti-Mo Intensity (a.u.) Intensity Si-Mo-W-V Intensity (a.u.) Ti-Mo-V o o o Si-Mo-V Ti-Mo-W-V Si-Mo-W-V-PO Ti-Mo-W-V-PO 4 4 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 2 Theta (Grad) 2 Theta (Grad) Fig.1. X–ray diffraction patterns of titania (a) and silica (b) loaded with Mo, W and V- oxides. Comparison of dehydration activity. Glycerol possesses primary and secondary OH-groups and offers two main reaction pathways for dehydration with formation of hydroxyacetone and acrolein [2]. Additionally, different O-containing compounds such as acetone, acetaldehyde, propionaldehyde, allylalcohol, acetic acid, propionic acid, phenol and COx were detected. The effect of V-, W-, Mg-oxides and PO4 on the performance of the supported titania catalysts in the formation of main dehydration products of glycerol in absence of oxygen for the temperatureregion 180-330°C is presented in Fig. 2. Ti-Mo Ti-Mo-V Ti-Mo-W Ti-Mo-V-W Ti-PO4 Ti-Mg 60 60 Allylalcohol Hydroxyacetone 40 40 20 20 Selectivity (%) Selectivity 0 0 180 210 240 270 300 330 210 240 270 300 330 80 60 Acetic acid Acrolein 60 40 40 Selectivity (%) Selectivity 20 20 0 0 180 210 240 270 300 330 180 210 240 270 300 330 Temperature (°C) Fig. 2. Catalytic performance of titania catalysts loaded with PO4, Mg-, Mo- ,W- and V-oxide during dehydration of glycerol at different temperature. Data analysed after 4h of reaction. DGMK-Tagungsbericht 2011-2 255 Catalysis – Innovative Applications in Petrochemistry and Refining The results of GC-analysis show that all investigated catalysts exhibit full conversion only at temperature higher than 270°C. At temperature lower than 240°C the glycerol conversion was between 10 and 40%.The C-balance for catalytic tests at 180-240°C was between 55 and 60%.
Recommended publications
  • EPA Method 8315A (SW-846): Determination of Carbonyl Compounds by High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC)
    METHOD 8315A DETERMINATION OF CARBONYL COMPOUNDS BY HIGH PERFORMANCE LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY (HPLC) 1.0 SCOPE AND APPLICATION 1.1 This method provides procedures for the determination of free carbonyl compounds in various matrices by derivatization with 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine (DNPH). The method utilizes high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) with ultraviolet/visible (UV/vis) detection to identify and quantitate the target analytes. This method includes two procedures encompassing all aspects of the analysis (extraction to determination of concentration). Procedure 1 is appropriate for the analysis of aqueous, soil and waste samples and stack samples collected by Method 0011. Procedure 2 is appropriate for the analysis of indoor air samples collected by Method 0100. The list of target analytes differs by procedure. The appropriate procedure for each target analyte is listed in the table below. Compound CAS No. a Proc. 1b Proc. 2 b Acetaldehyde 75-07-0 X X Acetone 67-64-1 X Acrolein 107-02-8 X Benzaldehyde 100-52-7 X Butanal (Butyraldehyde) 123-72-8 X X Crotonaldehyde 123-73-9 X X Cyclohexanone 108-94-1 X Decanal 112-31-2 X 2,5-Dimethylbenzaldehyde 5779-94-2 X Formaldehyde 50-00-0 X X Heptanal 111-71-7 X Hexanal (Hexaldehyde) 66-25-1 X X Isovaleraldehyde 590-86-3 X Nonanal 124-19-6 X Octanal 124-13-0 X Pentanal (Valeraldehyde) 110-62-3 X X Propanal (Propionaldehyde) 123-38-6 X X m-Tolualdehyde 620-23-5 X X o-Tolualdehyde 529-20-4 X p-Tolualdehyde 104-87-0 X a Chemical Abstract Service Registry Number.
    [Show full text]
  • Toxicological Profile for Formaldehyde
    TOXICOLOGICAL PROFILE FOR FORMALDEHYDE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Public Health Service Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry July 1999 FORMALDEHYDE ii DISCLAIMER The use of company or product name(s) is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. FORMALDEHYDE iii UPDATE STATEMENT Toxicological profiles are revised and republished as necessary, but no less than once every three years. For information regarding the update status of previously released profiles, contact ATSDR at: Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Division of Toxicology/Toxicology Information Branch 1600 Clifton Road NE, E-29 Atlanta, Georgia 30333 FORMALDEHYDE vii QUICK REFERENCE FOR HEALTH CARE PROVIDERS Toxicological Profiles are a unique compilation of toxicological information on a given hazardous substance. Each profile reflects a comprehensive and extensive evaluation, summary, and interpretation of available toxicologic and epidemiologic information on a substance. Health care providers treating patients potentially exposed to hazardous substances will find the following information helpful for fast answers to often-asked questions. Primary Chapters/Sections of Interest Chapter 1: Public Health Statement: The Public Health Statement can be a useful tool for educating patients about possible exposure to a hazardous substance. It explains a substance’s relevant toxicologic properties in a nontechnical, question-and-answer format, and it includes a review of the general health effects observed following exposure. Chapter 2: Health Effects: Specific health effects of a given hazardous compound are reported by route of exposure, by type of health effect (death, systemic, immunologic, reproductive), and by length of exposure (acute, intermediate, and chronic).
    [Show full text]
  • Influence of Impurities in a Methanol Solvent on the Epoxidation of Propylene with Hydrogen Peroxide Over Titanium Silicalite‐1
    Supplementary Materials Influence of Impurities in a Methanol Solvent on the Epoxidation of Propylene with Hydrogen Peroxide over Titanium Silicalite‐1 Gang Wang, Yue Li, Quanren Zhu, Gang Li, Chao Zhang, and Hongchen Guo* State Key Laboratory of Fine Chemicals and School of Chemical Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, No. 2 Linggong Road, Dalian 116024, PR China; [email protected] (G.W.); [email protected] (Y.L.); [email protected] (Q.Z.); [email protected] (G.L.); [email protected] (C.Z.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel./Fax: +86‐411‐84986120 Received: 23 November 2019; Accepted: 18 December 2019; Published: date Table S1. Influence of fusel alcohol content on the product distribution and turnover numbers in epoxidation of propylene with H2O2a Conten Selectivity, % Impurity TONb t, wt.% 1M2Pc 2M1Pc PGc DGMEc PGMEc AAc PAc ATc noned 0.00 314.5 0.50 0.52 0.17 0.08 0.00 0.23 0.06 0.00 ethanol 1.00 296.8 0.48 0.46 0.17 0.06 0.01 0.22 0.06 0.00 1.50 286.8 0.45 0.45 0.15 0.05 0.02 0.26 0.06 0.01 2.00 282.9 0.38 0.42 0.14 0.04 0.02 0.28 0.07 0.01 2.50 267.9 0.38 0.41 0.14 0.03 0.03 0.29 0.07 0.01 2‐propanol 0.50 296.8 0.45 0.49 0.17 0.06 0.00 0.21 0.07 0.03 0.75 286.8 0.43 0.47 0.15 0.06 0.00 0.22 0.07 0.05 1.00 282.9 0.41 0.47 0.15 0.04 0.00 0.25 0.08 0.07 1.25 267.9 0.37 0.38 0.14 0.03 0.00 0.26 0.09 0.08 1‐propanol 0.50 297.7 0.51 0.55 0.18 0.06 0.00 0.21 0.11 0.00 0.75 289.0 0.45 0.49 0.18 0.05 0.00 0.22 0.11 0.00 1.00 282.5 0.44 0.49 0.17 0.05 0.00 0.24 0.14 0.01 1.25 266.0 0.43 0.48 0.16 0.05 0.00 0.26 0.14 0.01 Note: a Reaction conditions: pre‐adsorbed TS‐1 powder 0.4 g, fresh methanol or simulated methanol solvents containing ethanol, 2‐propanol and 1‐propanol 35.5 mL, H2O2 (50 wt.%) 4.5 mL, NH3∙H2O (0.32 mol/L) 0.2 mL, propylene pressure 0.6 MPa, 50 ℃, 1 h.
    [Show full text]
  • Propionaldehyde Pad
    PROPIONALDEHYDE PAD CAUTIONARY RESPONSE INFORMATION 4. FIRE HAZARDS 7. SHIPPING INFORMATION 4.1 Flash Point: 7.1 Grades of Purity: 97-99+% Common Synonyms Liquid Colorless Suffocating, –22°F O.C. 7.2 Storage Temperature: Ambient Methyl acetaldehyde unpleasant odor 4.2 Flammable Limits in Air: 2.6%-16.1% Propanal 7.3 Inert Atmosphere: No requirement 4.3 Fire Extinguishing Agents: Carbon Propionic aldehyde 7.4 Venting: Open (flame arrester) or pressure- dioxide or dry chemical for small fires, Propyl aldehyde Floats and mixes slowly with water. Flammable, irritating vapor is vacuum Propylic aldehyde produced. alcohol-type foam for large fires. 4.4 Fire Extinguishing Agents Not to Be 7.5 IMO Pollution Category: C Used: Water may be ineffective. 7.6 Ship Type: 3 Keep people away. Avoid contact with liquid and vapor. Wear goggles, self-contained breathing apparatus, and rubber overclothing 4.5 Special Hazards of Combustion 7.7 Barge Hull Type: Currently not available (including gloves). Products: Not pertinent Shut off ignition sources and call fire department. 4.6 Behavior in Fire: Vapor is heavier than 8. HAZARD CLASSIFICATIONS Stay upwind and use water spray to ``knock down'' vapor. air and may travel considerable distance Notify local health and pollution control agencies. to a source of ignition and flash back. 8.1 49 CFR Category: Flammable liquid Protect water intakes. 4.7 Auto Ignition Temperature: 405°F 8.2 49 CFR Class: 3 4.8 Electrical Hazards: Not pertinent 8.3 49 CFR Package Group: II FLAMMABLE. Fire Flashback along vapor trail may occur. 4.9 Burning Rate: 4.4 mm/min.
    [Show full text]
  • Lowtemperature Chemoselective Goldsurfacemediated
    DOI: 10.1002/cctc.201200311 Low-Temperature Chemoselective Gold-Surface-Mediated Hydrogenation of Acetone and Propionaldehyde Ming Pan,[a] Zachary D. Pozun,[b] Adrian J. Brush,[a] Graeme Henkelman,[b] and C. Buddie Mullins*[a] Since nanoscale gold was first discovered to be catalytically First, the hydrogenation of acetone was investigated on active,[1] gold-based catalysts have been studied both theoreti- a Au(111) surface. In a control experiment (Figure 1a), 1.62 ML cally[2] and experimentally[3] in a wide range of reactions.[4] (ML= monolayer) of acetone (m/z=43, the most-abundant These catalysts exhibit high activity for hydrogenation process- mass fragment of acetone) was adsorbed onto a clean Au(111) es,[5] in particular showing enhanced selectivity.[6] However, there is a lack of relevant fundamental studies into these pro- cesses. Conducting hydrogenation reactions on model gold surfaces is useful for obtaining mechanistic insight and for fur- ther enhancing our understanding of the catalytic properties of supported-gold catalysts. Herein, we report the chemoselec- tive hydrogenation of aldehydes over ketones on gold surfaces. The hydrogenation chemistry of oxygenated hydrocarbons has been studied on transition-metal surfaces for a variety of reactions that are important to the pharmaceutical- and chemi- cal industries.[7] For example, C=O bond hydrogenation is a key step in the catalytic conversion of cellulosic biomass.[8] In addi- tion, gold-based catalysts have also shown exceptional activity for the selective hydrogenation of a,b-unsaturated carbonyl compounds.[9] Claus found that, in the production of allyl alco- hol from the hydrogenation of acrolein, gold catalysts yielded about 10-times-higher selectivity for C=O bond hydrogenation than traditional platinum-based catalysts.[10] Therefore, explor- ing the individual reactivity of carbonyl-hydrogenation could provide useful information for a better holistic understanding of these important catalytic reactions.
    [Show full text]
  • Kinetics of Oxidation of Formaldehyde, Acetaldehyde, Propionaldehyde & Butyraldehyde by Ditelluratocuprate(III) in Alkaline Medium
    r Jndlan Journal of Chemistry Vol. 17A, January 1979,pp. 48·51 Kinetics of Oxidation of Formaldehyde, Acetaldehyde, Propionaldehyde & Butyraldehyde by Ditelluratocuprate(III) in Alkaline Medium C. P. MURTHY, B. SETHURAM & T. NAVANEETH RAO· Department of Chemistry, Osmania University, Hyderabad 500007 Received 8 June 1978; accepted 25 July 1978 Kinetics of oxidation oJ formaldehyde, acetaldehyde, proplonaldehyde and n-butyraldehyde by potasstum ditelluratocuprate(III) has been studied in alkaline medium spectrophoto- :metrically. The order in [aldeh;de] and [Cu(III)) are found to be one each and rates decreased with increase in [tellurate] and increase in [OH-]. There is no effect of addition of salts like Na, SO. and KNOa• The products of oxidation are identified as corresponding carboxylic acids. Under the experimental conditions the :monotelluratocuprate(III) species is assu:med as the active species. The ther:modynamic para:meters are also reported and a plausible mechanism has been suggested. SE of Cu(III) as an oxidizing agent is well corrections made for any self-decomposition of known in analytical chemistry in the estimation Cu (III) during the reaction. U of sugars-, glycerols-, amino acids", proteinss, carboxylic acids", carbonyl compounds" and alcohols? Results The presence of Cu(III) as intermediate was also Under the conditions [Cu(III)] ~ [aldehyde] the reported in some Cu(II)-catalysed oxidation reactions plots of log (absorbance) versus time were linear by peroxydisulphate" and vanadium (V)9. The kine- (Fig. lA), indicating the order in [Cu(III)J to be tics of decomposition and formation of Cu(III) unity. From the slopes of the above plots the diperiodate and ditellurate complexes were also pseudo-first order rate constants (k') were evaluated.
    [Show full text]
  • Chemical Compatibility Chart X
    Chemical Compatibility Chart Below is a chart adapted from the CRC Laboratory Handbook, which groups various chemicals in to 23 groups with examples and incompatible chemical groups. This chart is by no means complete but it will aid in making decisions about storage. For more complete information please refer to the MSDS for the specific chemical. Examples of each group can be found on the next pages. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Monomers Polymerizable Esters Alcohols, Glycols, Glycol Ether Amines and Alkanolamines Halogenated Compounds Aldehydes Acetaldehyde Saturated Hydrocar Aromatic Hydrocarbons Acid Anhydrides Alkylene Oxides Inorganic Acids Petrolium Oils Organic Acids Cyanohydrins Phosphorus Ammonia Group Halogens Ketones Caustics Phenols Nitriles Olefins Ethers Number/Chemical Esters Type bons Inorganic 1 x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x Acids 2 Organic Acids x x x x x x x x x x 3 Caustics x x x x x x x x x x x x x Amines and 4 x x x x x x x x x x x x Alkanolamines Halogenated 5 x x x x x x Compounds Alcohols, 6 Glycols, Glycol x x x x x x Ether Aldehydes 7 x x x x x x x x x x x x Acetaldehyde 8 Ketones x x x x x x Saturated 9 x Hydrocarbons Aromatic 10 x x Hydrocarbons 11 Olefins x x x 12 Petrolium Oils x 13 Esters x x x x x Monomers 14 Polymerizable x x x x x x x x x x x x Esters 15 Phenols x x x x x x x Alkylene 16 x x x x x x x x x x x x Oxides 17 Cyanohydrins x x x x x x x x x 18 Nitriles x x x x x x 19 Ammonia x x x x x x x x x x x 20 Halogens x x x x x x x x x x x x x x 21 Ethers x x x 22 Phosphorus x x x x Acid 23 x x x x x x x x x x Anhydrides X - Indicates chemicals that are incompatible and should not be stored together.
    [Show full text]
  • Propionaldehyde
    SIGMA-ALDRICH sigma-aldrich.com Material Safety Data Sheet Version 4.4 Revision Date 10/23/2013 Print Date 02/05/2014 1. PRODUCT AND COMPANY IDENTIFICATION Product name : Propionaldehyde Product Number : W292303 Brand : Aldrich Supplier : Sigma-Aldrich 3050 Spruce Street SAINT LOUIS MO 63103 USA Telephone : +1 800-325-5832 Fax : +1 800-325-5052 Emergency Phone # (For : (314) 776-6555 both supplier and manufacturer) Preparation Information : Sigma-Aldrich Corporation Product Safety - Americas Region 1-800-521-8956 2. HAZARDS IDENTIFICATION Emergency Overview OSHA Hazards Flammable liquid, Target Organ Effect, Harmful by ingestion., Irritant Target Organs Liver Other hazards which do not result in classification Stench. GHS Classification Flammable liquids (Category 2) Acute toxicity, Oral (Category 4) Acute toxicity, Inhalation (Category 4) Acute toxicity, Dermal (Category 5) Skin irritation (Category 2) Serious eye damage (Category 1) Specific target organ toxicity - single exposure (Category 3), Respiratory system Acute aquatic toxicity (Category 3) GHS Label elements, including precautionary statements Pictogram Signal word Danger Hazard statement(s) H225 Highly flammable liquid and vapour. H302 + H332 Harmful if swallowed or if inhaled H313 May be harmful in contact with skin. H315 Causes skin irritation. H318 Causes serious eye damage. H335 May cause respiratory irritation. H402 Harmful to aquatic life. Aldrich - W292303 Page 1 of 7 Precautionary statement(s) P210 Keep away from heat/sparks/open flames/hot surfaces. - No smoking. P261 Avoid breathing dust/ fume/ gas/ mist/ vapours/ spray. P280 Wear protective gloves/ eye protection/ face protection. P305 + P351 + P338 IF IN EYES: Rinse cautiously with water for several minutes. Remove contact lenses, if present and easy to do.
    [Show full text]
  • Advancing the Curation of Aldehydes and Ketones for Applications to Carbonaceous Chondrite Curation and Cometary Nucleus Sample Return P
    84th Annual Meeting of The Meteoritical Society 2021 (LPI Contrib. No. 2609) 6119.pdf ADVANCING THE CURATION OF ALDEHYDES AND KETONES FOR APPLICATIONS TO CARBONACEOUS CHONDRITE CURATION AND COMETARY NUCLEUS SAMPLE RETURN P. J. A. Hill1, M. Chevalier1, C. D. K. Herd1, and R. W. Hilts2, 1Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, 1- 26 Earth Sciences Building, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada [email protected], 2Department of Physical Sciences, MacEwan University, Edmonton, Alberta T5J 4S2, Canada. Introduction: The presence of abiogenic organic compounds in carbonaceous chondrites and cometary material marks an important starting point for investigations examining the processes that led to the origin of life. Of particular interest are the aldehydes and ketones, commonly known as “carbonyl compounds”, which play an important role in the synthesis of a range of organic compounds, including amino acids [1–3]. With ongoing sample return missions from asteroids, proposed future sample return missions from cometary nuclei, and the continual arrival of carbona- ceous chondrites to the Earth’s surface via meteorites, establish the ideal curation conditions for the preservation of extraterrestrial organic compounds that proactively prevent terrestrial reactions is essential for ongoing research. Given the importance of carbonyl compounds in the production of other organic compounds required for early bio- genic processes, the aim of this study is to examine the reactivity of carbonyl compounds under a variety of conditions to provide insight into the curation and handling requirements of organic-rich astromaterials. Methodology: To monitor the reactivity of carbonyl compounds under various curation conditions, a powdered mixture of the Allende meteorite was prepared as the medium for this study.
    [Show full text]
  • Safety Data Sheet Propionaldehyde
    Safety data sheet Issue Date 14-Nov-2019 Revision Date 14-Nov-2019 Version 3 SECTION 1: Identification of the substance/mixture and of the company/undertaking 1.1. Product identifier Product Name Propionaldehyde Chemical Name CAS No EC No REACH Registration Number Propionaldehyde 123-38-6 204-623-0 01-2119456625-33-0001 Pure substance/mixture Substance 1.2. Relevant identified uses of the substance or mixture and uses advised against Application Use: as an intermediate, strictly controlled conditions applies (exposure scenarios not required) Uses advised against Not identified. 1.3. Details of the supplier of the safety data sheet Manufacturer Perstorp Oxo AB SE-444 84 Stenungsund Sweden Tel. +46 303 728600 Fax. +46 303 728607 www.perstorp.com E-mail address [email protected] 1.4. Emergency telephone number Europe (+)1 760 476 3961 (contract no: 334101) United Kingdom (+)44 8 08 189 0979 (contract no: 334101) SECTION 2: Hazards identification 2.1. Classification of the substance or mixture Classification according to Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008 [CLP] Acute toxicity - Oral Category 4 - (H302) Acute toxicity - Inhalation (Vapours) Category 4 - (H332) Skin corrosion/irritation Category 2 - (H315) Serious eye damage/eye irritation Category 2 - (H319)* Specific target organ toxicity (single exposure) Category 3 - (H335) Flammable liquids Category 2 - (H225) 2.2. Label elements Symbols/Pictograms Signal word ___________________________________________________________________________________________ Page 1 / 10 EUGB - BE Propionaldehyde Revision Date 14-Nov-2019 ___________________________________________________________________________________________ Danger Hazard statements H225 - Highly flammable liquid and vapour H332 - Harmful if inhaled H302 - Harmful if swallowed H319 - Causes serious eye irritation H315 - Causes skin irritation H335 - May cause respiratory irritation Precautionary Statements P210 - Keep away from heat/sparks/open flames/hot surfaces.
    [Show full text]
  • Butyraldehyde by Manganese(III)
    NOTIZEN 691 Kinetics of the Oxidation of Acetaldehyde by they undergo enolisation. Oxidation of aliphatic Manganese(III) Sulphate aldehydes has not received much attention. Kinetics of the oxidation of acetaldehyde was, therefore, undertaken the results of which are reported here. M. S. M urdia, R. S h a n k e r , and G. V. B a k o r e Experimental Chemistry Department, University of Udaipur, India Acetaldehyde (B . D . H., A. R.) was used after (Z. Naturforsch. 29b, 691-693 [1974]; received July 11, 1974) fractionation and its purity checked by its boiling point. Mn(III)-sulphate wras prepared by the method Acetaldehyde, Manganese(III)-sulphate, Activation parameters described by V o g e l 4. The reaction was carried out at 30 + 0.02 °C and was followed spectrophoto- metrically at 520 nm using a Hilger pattern biochem. Oxidation of acetaldehyde with manganese(III)- absorptiometer. The cell tube was surrounded by a sulphate is first order with respect to acetaldehyde and block through which thermostated water was the oxidant. The rate is independent of acidity (2.0 > circulated. [H+] < 5.0 M and initial [Mn(II)]. Formaldehyde is Stoichiometry and product analysis one of the products of oxidation. Activation para­ meters for the reaction have been evaluated. The rate One mole of acetaldehyde consumes 4 moles of the oxidant. Formaldehyde, detected by chromo- of enolisation under similar conditions is less than the tropic acid test6, is one of the products of exidation. rate of oxidation. A mechanism involving a direct Thus, the overall reaction can be represonted as: attack on the aldehyde by Mn(III) has been suggested.
    [Show full text]
  • Propionaldehyde CAS Registry Number: 123-38-6
    Development Support Document Final September 14, 2015 Propionaldehyde CAS Registry Number: 123-38-6 Prepared by Stephanie Shirley, Ph.D. Toxicology Division Office of the Executive Director TEXAS COMMISSION ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY Propionaldehyde Page i TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................................................................................................. I LIST OF TABLES ......................................................................................................................................................II LIST OF FIGURES ....................................................................................................................................................II CHAPTER 1 SUMMARY TABLES .......................................................................................................................... 1 CHAPTER 2 MAJOR SOURCES AND USES ......................................................................................................... 5 CHAPTER 3 ACUTE EVALUATION ...................................................................................................................... 5 3.1 HEALTH-BASED ACUTE REV AND ESL ................................................................................................ 5 3.1.1 Physical/Chemical Properties ..................................................................................................................... 6 3.1.2 Key Human Study (Sim and Pattle 1957) ...................................................................................................
    [Show full text]