79456 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 238 / Thursday, December 10, 2020 / Proposed Rules

could influence the distribution and under the Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards dispensing rates, if any, of samidorphan, U.S.C. 3501–3521. This action would (FMVSS) may be a candidate for DEA is unable to determine the number not impose recordkeeping or reporting replacement, repeal, or modification, for of entities and small entities which requirements on State or local reasons other than for considerations might handle samidorphan. In some governments, individuals, businesses, or relevant only to automated driving instances where a controlled organizations. systems (ADS). This document is a pharmaceutical drug is removed from continuation of the Agency’s efforts to List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 1308 the schedules of the CSA, DEA is able improve the FMVSS and minimize to quantify the estimated number of Administrative practice and burdens. The Agency takes this action affected entities and small entities procedure, Drug traffic control, in response to its review of the FMVSS because the handling of the drug is Reporting and recordkeeping and to public comments solicited by expected to be limited to DEA requirements. DOT in a 2017 notice on its regulatory registrants even after removal from the For the reasons set out above, 21 CFR reform efforts. The commenters schedules. In such instances, DEA’s part 1308 is proposed to be amended to requested that NHTSA amend test knowledge of its registrant population read as follows: procedures for air brakes and occupant forms the basis for estimating the crash protection. NHTSA has also number of affected entities and small PART 1308—SCHEDULES OF identified some possible additional test entities. However, DEA does not have a CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES procedure issues and discusses them in basis to estimate whether samidorphan this Notice. In addition, this ANPRM is expected to be handled by persons ■ 1. The authority citation for 21 CFR also seeks comments and supporting who hold DEA registrations, by persons part 1308 continues to read as follows: information relating to any other test who are not currently registered with Authority: 21 U.S.C. 811, 812, 871(b), procedures which may be a candidate DEA to handle controlled substances, or 956(b), unless otherwise noted. for replacement, repeal or modification, both. Therefore, DEA is unable to ■ 2. In § 1308.12, revise the introductory not just those specifically discussed in estimate the number of entities and text of paragraph (b)(1) to read as this Notice. small entities who plan to handle follows: DATES: Comments must be received no samidorphan. later than February 8, 2021. See the Although DEA does not have a § 1308.12 Schedule II. Public Participation heading of the reliable basis to estimate the number of * * * * * SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of affected entities and quantify the (b) * * * this document for more information economic impact of this final rule, a (1) Opium and opiate, and any salt, about written comments. qualitative analysis indicates that this compound, derivative, or preparation of rule is likely to result in some cost ADDRESSES: You may submit comments opium or opiate excluding to the docket number identified in the savings. As noted above, DEA is apomorphine, thebaine-derived specifically soliciting comments on the heading of this document by any of the butorphanol, dextrorphan, nalbuphine, following methods: economic impact of this proposed rule. naldemedine, nalmefene, naloxegol, • DEA will revise this section if warranted Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to naloxone, 6b-naltrexol, naltrexone, and http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the after consideration of any comments samidorphan, and their respective salts, received. Any person planning to online instructions for submitting but including the following: comments. handle samidorphan will realize cost • savings in the form of saved DEA * * * * * Mail: Docket Management Facility: U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200 registration fees, and the elimination of Timothy J. Shea, physical security, recordkeeping, and New Jersey Avenue SE, West Building Acting Administrator. Ground Floor, Room W12–140, reporting requirements. [FR Doc. 2020–26812 Filed 12–9–20; 8:45 am] Because of these factors, DEA projects Washington, DC 20590–0001 BILLING CODE 4410–09–P • that this rule will not result in a Hand Delivery or Courier: 1200 significant economic impact on a New Jersey Avenue SE, West Building substantial number of small entities. Ground Floor, Room W12–140, between DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 9 a.m. and 5 p.m. ET, Monday through Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 Friday, except Federal holidays. On the basis of information contained National Highway Traffic Safety • Fax: 202–493–2251. in the ‘‘RFA’’ section above, DEA has Administration Instructions: For detailed instructions determined and certifies pursuant to the on submitting comments and additional Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 49 CFR Part 571 information on the rulemaking process, (UMRA), 2 U.S.C. 1501 et seq., that this [Docket No. NHTSA–2020–0109] see the Public Participation heading of action would not result in any federal the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section RIN 2127–AM04 mandate that may result ‘‘in the of this document. Note that all expenditure by State, local, and tribal Federal Motor Vehicle Safety comments received will be posted governments, in the aggregate, or by the Standards: Test Procedures without change to http:// private sector, of $100,000,000 or more www.regulations.gov, including any (adjusted for inflation) in any one year AGENCY: National Highway Traffic personal information provided. Please * * *.’’ Therefore, neither a Small Safety Administration (NHTSA), see the ‘‘Privacy Act’’ heading below. Government Agency Plan nor any other Department of Transportation (DOT). Privacy Act: Anyone is able to search action is required under provisions of ACTION: Advance notice of proposed the electronic form of all comments UMRA. rulemaking (ANPRM). received into any docket by the name of the individual submitting the comment Paperwork Reduction Act SUMMARY: NHTSA is issuing this (or signing the comment, if submitted This action does not impose a new ANPRM to seek public comment on on behalf of an association, business, collection of information requirement whether any test procedures for any labor union, etc.). You may review

VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:26 Dec 09, 2020 Jkt 253001 PO 00000 Frm 00023 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\10DEP1.SGM 10DEP1 jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 238 / Thursday, December 10, 2020 / Proposed Rules 79457

DOT’s complete Privacy Act Statement advance notices of proposed rulemaking Because these comments require in the Federal Register published on (ANPRMs) on various regulatory reform consideration of both performance April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477–78). topics. requirements and test procedures, the Confidential Information: If you wish This ANPRM specifically discusses comments are discussed in the ANPRM to submit any information under a claim test procedures 2 that may be candidates for RIN 2127–AM05, which deals with of confidentiality, you should submit for replacement, repeal, or modification. regulatory barriers in the performance three copies of your complete This Notice does not address the requirements for non-ADS vehicles. submission, including the information performance requirements within the A. FMVSS No. 103 you claim to be confidential business standards, but only the test procedures information, to the Chief Counsel of specified in the standards for NHTSA to Compliance with the performance NHTSA, at the address given under FOR use to verify compliance. Additionally, requirements of FMVSS No. 103, FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. In this Notice does not address issues Windshield defrosting and defogging addition, you should submit two copies, related to test procedures relevant only systems (49 CFR 571.103), is determined from which you have deleted the to technologies for automated driving by the Agency using a test procedure claimed confidential business systems (ADS), commonly referred to as incorporated from SAE Recommended information, to Docket Management at automated or self-driving vehicles. Practice J902 (August 1964 or March the address given above under Comments on test procedures that may 1967), which is predicated on a ADDRESSES. When you send a comment be candidates for repeal, replacement, or vehicle’s having a conventional internal containing information claimed to be modification to permit the introduction combustion engine (ICE). The Agency is confidential business information, you and certification of ADS would be more considering whether these procedures should include a cover letter setting appropriate for the ANPRM for RIN should be revised or modified for forth the information specified in the 2127–AM00 3 or one of the topic- vehicles with other types of propulsion confidential business information specific ANPRMs. NHTSA also notes and requests comment on this issue. regulation. (49 CFR part 512.) that the specific test procedures B. FMVSS 104 Docket: For access to the docket to discussed in the remainder of this read background documents or Notice are not meant to be an exclusive Determination of compliance with the comments received, go to http:// listing of the test procedures that may be performance requirements of FMVSS www.regulations.gov or the street suitable candidates for replacement, 104, Windshield wiping and washing address listed above. Follow the online repeal, or modification. Rather, these systems (49 CFR 571.104), has the same instructions for accessing the dockets. tests procedures are intended to serve as test procedure issue as FMVSS 103 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. examples for why a test procedure since it is also predicated on the Mary Versailles, Office of Rulemaking, might be a candidate. vehicle’s having an ICE. In addition, National Highway Traffic Safety should the test procedure be updated for Administration, 1200 New Jersey II. Example Test Procedures newer systems with rain sensor Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590. As discussed in this section, NHTSA, technology? Telephone: (202) 366–2057. partially in response to comments, has C. FMVSS 105/135 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: identified possible examples of test FMVSS 105, Hydraulic and electric procedures that might be candidates for Table of Contents brake systems (49 CFR 571.105), is replacement, repeal, or modification. applicable to multi-purpose passenger I. Background These are discussed below to illustrate vehicles (MPVs), trucks, and buses with II. Example Test Procedures the kinds of test procedures for which a gross vehicle weight rating (GVWR) of A. FMVSS No. 103 the Agency would like to seek comment B. FMVSS No. 104 3,500 kilograms (kg; 7,716 pounds (lbs)) for this Notice. DOT received a few C. FMVSS Nos. 105/135 or more equipped with hydraulically or comments from trade associations that D. FMVSS No. 121 electrically actuated brakes. The addressed test procedure changes. The E. FMVSS No. 126 standard has not been updated since Truck and Engine Manufacturers III. Questions Requesting Further Information 1976. NHTSA has a similar brake From the Public Association (‘‘EMA’’; DOT–OST–2017– standard, FMVSS No. 135, Light vehicle IV. Public Participation 0069–2786) commented on the test brake systems (49 CFR 571.135), which V. Rulemaking Notices and Analyses procedures of FMVSS No. 121, but, as went into effect in 1995 and applies to discussed below, NHTSA would like I. Background hydraulically braked vehicles, but with more information on the request to On October 2, 2017, the Department a GVWR less than 3,500 kg. Should the understand better EMA’s suggestion. of Transportation (DOT) published a Agency revise the test procedures in The Alliance of Automobile Notice in the Federal Register inviting either of these brake standards to Manufacturers (‘‘Alliance’’; DOT–OST– ‘‘the public to provide input on existing improve clarity or efficiency for 2017–0069–2700), raised issues relating rules and other agency actions that are compliance? to FMVSS Nos. 208 and 209. The good candidates for repeal, replacement, For example, the FMVSS Nos. 105/ Association of Global Automakers suspension, or modification.’’ 1 DOT 135 braking tests could be revised (‘‘Global’’; DOT–OST–2017–0069–2772) received almost 3,000 comments in consistent with FMVSS No. 122, raised the same issue as the Alliance response to this Notice, of which Motorcycle brake systems (49 CFR relating to FMVSS No. 208, but did not approximately twenty-three addressed 571.122), as it relates to the number of address FMVSS No. 209. Both the rules and agency actions under the stopping attempts for each specified test Alliance and Global suggested changes scope of the National Highway Traffic condition. FMVSS Nos. 105/135 to FMVSS Nos. 208 and 209 that appear Safety Administration (NHTSA). In specifies, in most test conditions, the to go beyond test procedure changes. response to these public comments, and completion of no fewer than six stops on the Agency’s own initiative, the regardless of which of the stops, or how 2 As used in this notice, ‘‘test procedures’’ agency is planning to issue a series of includes test conditions, test procedures, and test many of them, meet the stopping devices (e.g., dummies and crash barriers). distance performance requirement. 1 82 FR 45750. 3 84 FR 24433, May 29, 2019. FMVSS No. 122, on the other hand,

VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:26 Dec 09, 2020 Jkt 253001 PO 00000 Frm 00024 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\10DEP1.SGM 10DEP1 jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS 79458 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 238 / Thursday, December 10, 2020 / Proposed Rules

permits the skipping of the remaining notice are just examples of test test result without meeting the intent of stops (if any) for that test and allowing procedures that might be a candidate for a standard or regulation? If so, how can the next test to be performed once a replacement, repeal, or modification, such loopholes be closed by updating passing stop is obtained, even if that and thus illustrate the types of reasons the test procedure? why such a change may be necessary. occurs before the specified number of V. Public Participation stops are made. Should FMVSS Nos. NHTSA requests comments on the 105/135 be updated and would this specific test procedure issues discussed a. How can I influence NHTSA’s change reduce testing time and cost above, other issues related to the test thinking on this subject? without compromising the safety procedures for the FMVSSs discussed Your comments will help NHTSA evaluation of the braking system? above, and issues related to the test improve its consideration of issues procedures for any other FMVSS. For D. FMVSS No. 121 raised by this ANPRM. NHTSA invites example, a test procedure may specify you to provide different views on EMA commented that, despite a testing that is no longer necessary, or options NHTSA discusses, new number of revisions in the past, FMVSS may not be clear about how to test approaches the agency has not No. 121, Air brake systems (49 CFR vehicles with newer technology, or may considered, new data, descriptions of 571.121), has not kept pace with even have the effect of prohibiting the how this ANPRM may affect you, or advances in heavy-duty air brake introduction of such vehicles. The other relevant information. components and systems. While Agency requests that commenters NHTSA welcomes public review on indicating that a number of provide as much research, evidence, or all aspects of this ANPRM. NHTSA will modifications would be appropriate to data as possible to support their consider the comments and information address this issue, EMA did not comments, as that information will be of received in developing a potential elaborate on them. The Agency requests great assistance to the Agency as it proposal for updating test procedures more information about the considers whether to develop a proposal for motor vehicles and motor vehicle modifications that would update the to revise the procedure. equipment. Your comments will be standard to keep pace with advances in In addition, commenters should most effective if you follow the heavy-duty air brake components and consider the following general questions suggestions below: systems, and why, specifically, they are when considering potential test • Explain your views and reasoning needed. procedure improvements: as clearly as possible. 1. Do any test procedures specify the • Provide solid evidence and data to E. FMVSS No. 126 use of equipment that is obsolete or no support your views. Section 6.3.4 of FMVSS No. 126, longer available at a reasonable cost? If • If you estimate potential costs, Electronic stability control systems (49 so, what options are available as explain how you arrived at that CFR 571.126), specifies the use of replacements? estimate. outriggers 4 when testing MPVs, trucks, 2. Do any test procedures specify the • Provide specific examples to and buses, but not when testing use of equipment in a manner that is illustrate your concerns. passenger cars. Today’s vehicle market more specific than necessary to ensure • Offer specific alternatives. • includes crossover vehicles which are that the test procedure be repeatable and Refer your comments to the specific classified as MPVs but which are reproducible? sections of (or questions listed in) the typically based on passenger car 3. Are there test procedures in ANPRM. platforms, unlike traditional MPVs, regulations from standards organizations or other countries that b. How do I prepare and submit which are based on light truck comments? platforms. What evidence is there that evaluate compliance with the same crossover vehicles perform more like requirement as one in an FMVSS? If so, Your primary comments should be passenger cars than traditional MPVs, what evidence is there that the test written in English. To ensure that your and how would updating the test procedure provides an evaluation of comments are filed in the correct procedure to remove the outriggers be compliance with the requirement in a docket, please include the docket justified? If the Agency was to specify manner and to an extent equivalent to number of this document in your the use of outriggers based on criteria the current test procedure in the comments. Your primary comments should not other than just vehicle classification, FMVSS? be more than 15 pages long (49 CFR what would commenters recommend for 4. What specific problems and 553.21), however, you may attach criteria? Would modifying the criteria challenges have testing laboratories, additional documents, such as improve efficiency and reduce the need researchers, or other entities supporting data or research, to your for these devices in some testing, encountered when trying to follow primary comments. There is no limit on thereby reducing costs? existing test procedures in an FMVSS? For each problem or challenge, please the length of the attachments. IV. Questions Requesting Further explain how it is currently addressed Please submit one copy (two copies if Information From the Public and any suggested solutions for how it submitting by mail or hand delivery) of your comments, including the In order to inform the Agency as it should be addressed in the future. attachments, to the docket following the works toward possible rulemaking 5. Are there any test procedures that instructions given in the ADDRESSES proposals, NHTSA invites comments on do not accurately reflect real-world section at the beginning of this any other test procedures that are scenarios? If so, what evidence is there document. Please note, if you are potential candidates for replacement, to show that a test procedure needs to submitting comments electronically as a repeal, or modification. NHTSA again be updated to reflect real-world PDF (Adobe) file, we ask that the emphasizes that the test procedures scenarios being tested more accurately? documents submitted be scanned using discussed in Sections II and III of this Similarly, how can test procedures be updated to represent a real-world the Optical Character Recognition (OCR) 4 An outrigger is a stabilizing device attached to scenario more accurately? process, thus allowing NHTSA to search the vehicle to protect the vehicle and/or driver from 6. Are there any loopholes in test and copy certain portions of your rollover during test maneuvers. procedures that could lead to a passing submission.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:26 Dec 09, 2020 Jkt 253001 PO 00000 Frm 00025 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\10DEP1.SGM 10DEP1 jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 238 / Thursday, December 10, 2020 / Proposed Rules 79459

Please note that pursuant to the Data f. How can I read the comments about alternative approaches and Quality Act, in order for substantive submitted by other people? relevant technical data on whether and data to be relied upon and used by the You may read the comments received how best to update test procedures agency, it must meet the information by the docket at the address given in the throughout 49 CFR part 571. These quality standards set forth in the OMB ADDRESSES section. The hours of the comments will help the Department and DOT Data Quality Act guidelines. docket are indicated above in the same evaluate whether a proposed Accordingly, we encourage you to location. You may also read the rulemaking is needed and appropriate. consult the guidelines in preparing your comments on the internet, identified by NHTSA has considered the impact of comments. DOT’s guidelines may be the docket number at the heading of this this ANPRM under Executive Order accessed at www.transportation.gov/ notice, at www.regulations.gov. Please 12866, Executive Order 13563, and the regulations/dot-information- note that, even after the comment DOT’s regulatory policies and dissemination-quality-guidelines. closing date, NHTSA will continue to procedures. As discussed in this notice, file relevant information in the docket the Agency lacks the necessary c. How can I be sure that my comments information to develop a proposal at were received? as it becomes available. Further, some people may submit late comments. this time due to a number of If you submit comments by hard copy Accordingly, NHTSA recommends that unanswered questions and unresolved and wish Docket Management to notify you periodically check the docket for considerations. However, NHTSA you upon its receipt of your comments, new material. anticipates that any proposal that was to enclose a self-addressed, stamped result from this Notice could have VI. Rulemaking Notices and Analyses postcard in the envelope containing minor economic impact by clarifying your comments. Upon receiving your a. Executive Orders 12866, 13563, and how newer technology is tested, or comments, Docket Management will DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures could result in cost-savings by eliminating unnecessary aspects of test return the postcard by mail. If you Executive Order 12866, ‘‘Regulatory submit comments electronically, your procedures. Therefore, this rulemaking Planning and Review’’ (58 FR 51735, has been determined to be not comments should appear automatically October 4, 1993), provides for making in the docket on www.regulations.gov. If ‘‘significant’’ under the Department of determinations whether a regulatory Transportation’s regulatory policies and they do not appear within two weeks of action is ‘‘significant’’ and therefore posting, NHTSA suggests that you call procedures and the policies of the Office subject to OMB review and to the of Management and Budget. the Docket Management Facility at 202– requirements of the Executive Order. 366–9826. The Order defines a ‘‘significant b. Executive Order 13771 (Reducing Regulation and Controlling Regulatory d. How do I submit confidential regulatory action’’ as one that is likely Costs) business information? to result in a rule that may: (1) Have an annual effect on the This action is not subject to the If you wish to submit any information economy of $100 million or more or requirements of E.O. 13771 (82 FR 9339, under a claim of confidentiality, you adversely affect in a material way the February 3, 2017) because it is an must submit three copies of your economy, a sector of the economy, advance notice of proposed rulemaking. complete submission, including the productivity, competition, jobs, the information that you claim to be environment, public health or safety, or c. Regulatory Flexibility Act confidential business information, to the State, local, or Tribal governments or Pursuant to the Regulatory Flexibility Office of the Chief Counsel, NHTSA, communities; Act, 5 U.S.C. 601 et seq., no analysis is U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200 (2) Create a serious inconsistency or required for an ANPRM. However, small New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC otherwise interfere with an action taken entities, including small vehicle 20590. or planned by another agency; manufacturers and equipment (3) Materially alter the budgetary In addition, you should submit a copy manufacturers, are encouraged to impact of entitlements, grants, user fees, comment if they identify any aspects of (two copies if submitting by mail or or loan programs or the rights and hand delivery) from which you have a potential rulemaking that may apply obligations of recipients thereof; or to them. deleted the claimed confidential (4) Raise novel legal or policy issues business information to the docket by arising out of legal mandates, the d. Executive Order 13132 (Federalism) one of the methods given above under President’s priorities, or the principles NHTSA does not believe that there ADDRESSES. When you submit a set forth in the Executive Order. would be sufficient federalism comment containing information Executive Order 13563, ‘‘Improving implications to warrant the preparation claimed to be confidential business Regulation and Regulatory Review’’ (76 of a federalism assessment. The purpose information, you should include a cover FR 3821, January 21, 2011), of this rulemaking is not to adopt new letter setting forth the information supplements and reaffirms the safety performance requirements which specified in NHTSA’s confidential principles established by Executive would preempt non-identical State business information regulation (49 CFR Order 12866 by encouraging requirements, but merely to revise test part 512). harmonization of regulations across procedures for existing safety e. Will the Agency consider late agencies and requiring agencies to performance requirements that would comments? consider regulatory approaches that not affect their stringency. reduce burdens and maintain flexibility NHTSA will consider all comments and freedom of choice. Additionally, e. Executive Order 12988 (Civil Justice that the docket receives before the close Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 Reform) of business on the comment closing date require agencies to provide a With respect to the review of the indicated in the DATES section. To the meaningful opportunity for public promulgation of a new regulation, extent possible, NHTSA will also participation. Accordingly, we have section 3(b) of Executive Order 12988, consider comments that the docket asked commenters to answer a variety of ‘‘Civil Justice Reform’’ (61 FR 4729, receives after that date. questions to elicit practical information February 7, 1996) requires that

VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:26 Dec 09, 2020 Jkt 253001 PO 00000 Frm 00026 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\10DEP1.SGM 10DEP1 jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS 79460 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 238 / Thursday, December 10, 2020 / Proposed Rules

Executive agencies make every adopted by voluntary consensus regulations, Executive Orders 12866 and reasonable effort to ensure that the standards bodies, such as the Society of 13563 require each agency to write all regulation: (1) Clearly specifies the Automotive Engineers. The NTTAA notices in plain language that is simple preemptive effect; (2) clearly specifies directs us to provide Congress (through and easy to understand. Application of the effect on existing Federal law or OMB) with explanations when we the principles of plain language regulation; (3) provides a clear legal decide not to use available and includes consideration of the following standard for affected conduct, while applicable voluntary consensus questions: promoting simplification and burden standards. As NHTSA has not yet • Have we organized the material to reduction; (4) clearly specifies the developed specific regulatory suit the public’s needs? retroactive effect, if any; (5) adequately provisions, the NTTAA does not apply • Are the requirements in the notice defines key terms; and (6) addresses for purposes of this ANPRM. clearly stated? other important issues affecting clarity h. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act • Does the notice contain technical and general draftsmanship under any language or jargon that is not clear? guidelines issued by the Attorney The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act • Would a different format (grouping General. This document is consistent of 1995 requires agencies to prepare a and order of sections, use of headings, with that requirement. written assessment of the costs, benefits, and other effects of proposed or final paragraphing) make the rule easier to f. Paperwork Reduction Act rules that include a Federal mandate understand? • Under the Paperwork Reduction Act likely to result in the expenditure of Would more (but shorter) sections of 1995 (PRA), a person is not required State, local, or Tribal governments, in be better? to respond to a collection of information the aggregate, or by the private sector, of • Could we improve clarity by adding by a Federal agency unless the more than $100 million annually tables, lists, or diagrams? collection displays a valid OMB control (adjusted for inflation with base year of If you have any responses to these number. There are no information 1995). NHTSA has determined that this questions, please include them in your collection requirements associated with ANPRM would not result in comments on this ANPRM. this ANPRM. Any information expenditures by State, local, or Tribal k. Regulatory Identifier Number (RIN) collection requirements and the governments, in the aggregate, or by the associated burdens will be discussed in private sector, in excess of $100 million The Department of Transportation detail once a proposal has been issued. annually. assigns a regulation identifier number (RIN) to each regulatory action listed in g. National Technology Transfer and i. National Environmental Policy Act Advancement Act the Unified Agenda of Federal NHTSA has analyzed this rulemaking Regulations. The Regulatory Information Section 12(d) of the National action for the purposes of the National Service Center publishes the Unified Technology Transfer and Advancement Environmental Policy Act. The agency Agenda in April and October of each Act (NTTAA) requires NHTSA to has preliminarily determined that year. You may use the RIN contained in evaluate and use existing voluntary implementation of this rulemaking the heading at the beginning of this consensus standards in its regulatory action would not have any significant document to find this action in the activities unless doing so would be impact on the quality of the human Unified Agenda. inconsistent with applicable law (e.g., environment. the statutory provisions regarding Issued in Washington, DC. NHTSA’s vehicle safety authority) or j. Plain Language Under authority delegated in 49 CFR part otherwise impractical. Voluntary The Plain Language Writing Act of 1.95 and 501.5. consensus standards are technical 2010 (Pub. L. 111–274) requires that James C. Owens, standards (e.g., materials specifications, Federal agencies write documents in a Deputy Administrator. test methods, sampling procedures, and clear, concise, and well-organized [FR Doc. 2020–27001 Filed 12–9–20; 8:45 am] business practices) that are developed or manner. While the Act does not cover BILLING CODE 4910–59–P

VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:26 Dec 09, 2020 Jkt 253001 PO 00000 Frm 00027 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 9990 E:\FR\FM\10DEP1.SGM 10DEP1 jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS