INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DISCOURSE ON

INNOVATION, INTEGRATION AND EDUCATION

Volume: 01 Issue: 02 | September 2020 ISSN: 2181-1067

http://summusjournals.uz/index.php/ijdiie

THE PLACE OF THE BABURIAN DYNASTY IN WORLD HISTORY Madumarov Talantbek ABSTRACT: Founded as a statesman in the history of the Tolibjonovich 1 Baburi dynasty, he became one of the world's most famous G’ulomjonov Odiljon Raximjon historians with his book "Boburnoma" written in Uzbek. His o’g’li 2 elegant ghazals and rubais are the rarest masterpieces of Turkish poetry, and his treatises on Mubayyin (Narrated), [email protected] EMAIL : Hatti Baburi, Harb ishi, and Aruz are worthy contributions to [email protected] Islamic jurisprudence, poetry, and linguistic theory.

KEY WORDS: history, heritage, rule, kingdom, population, 1 Doctor of Law, professor Dean periods, countries, beliefs, politics, historical figures. of the Faculty of Socio-

Economics of Andijan State University

2Andijan State University 3rd year student of the basics of national ideology and legal education

1. INTRODUCTION Bobur's life in the years that followed was full of courageous deeds that left an indelible mark on history. The most important of these is the conquest of India. The acquisition of Delhi and its dependent areas is particularly important. This march took place more than twenty years after ruled Kabul and Ghazna. Prior to that, Babur had ruled in Badakhshan, Kunduz and Kandahar. Before going into the details of Babur's march to India, it is worthwhile to give a brief account of the circumstances which played a certain role in the formation of his kingdom here, namely the state structure of India before Babur, the kingdom of Delhi and its events. The fate of the large population of India and its constituent countries seems to have long been doomed to fall victim to invaders from the north. They have not made any invasions since ancient times outside the vast territory from the Himalayas, the natural border of their country, to the Indian Ocean. After long marches by the Persians and Greeks, the country was later invaded by Asian Muslims by land and by European Christians by sea. The situation in the country has changed radically with the influx of Muslims. Their rule here is historically divided into two periods. The first period is from the arrival of Sultan

Published by “ SUMMUS LLC" http:// summusjournals.uz

IJDIIE Volume: 01 Issue: 02 | September 2020

Ghaznavi (1021) to the arrival of Babur and covers a period of five hundred years. The second period is a period of more than three hundred years, covering the period from the day Babur came to India to 1858. This is called the period of the Baburi dynasty in India. Babur Chigatay, who founded a new dynasty in India in 1526, belonged to the Turkic family. Yet in Indian history, his family is called the "Mongols." 2. MAIN PART Representatives of this dynasty have skillfully ruled India for a long time. They were able to maintain political unity in a very large part of the country and ensure the prosperity of this vast empire in peace. This dynasty supplied the country with a series of talented rulers from Babur to Avrangzeb. The Timurids usually did not consider the caliph as their piri, but ruled the state independently on the basis of their own views. They perfected the means and methods of waging war with the enemy. They used artillery for the first time in India. They also guided the growth and development of literature and the fine arts in every field. During the Baburi period, India's relations with foreign countries were restored. A country like Afghanistan would remain part of a great empire. He acted as a mediator to connect India with Iran, , and through them the far countries of the West. This would allow India to trade with foreign countries and further develop. It also helped maintain cultural ties with West Asian countries. For almost three centuries, Indians and Muslims have lived side by side without bringing religious rivalry by bringing together communities of two different faiths and two different lifestyles. Thus, the Baburis not only preserved many of the traditions used in the Delhi kingdom, but also succeeded in continuing many of them. That is why the history of the Baburi dynasty occupies an important and honorable place in the history of India. All modern historians emphasize that Babur has a very revered place in history. The English historian W.A. Smith writes, "Babur was the greatest of the Asian princes of the time, and his place in history is greatly admired among the princes of the past." European historian Havel describes Babur as "one of the most attractive figures in the history of the Islamic world." The English orientalist U. According to Erskin, "there was no prince among the Asian princes who could hold an equal position with Babur." Bobur’s personality and his character are undoubtedly worthy of such high praise. But if he had not conquered much of North India, he would not have held such a high place in the pages of history. His policies in Asian countries and his contribution to the conquest of Afghanistan did not bring him much fame. It is only because of his victorious marches in India that he has a famous and significant place in history. In the Middle Ages, only a powerful ruler was a good ruler. India, too, could only prosper on the basis of a strong and influential government. For centuries, the Rajputs, Turks, and Afghans took turns trying to establish an empire and a strong monarchy in India. They tried to establish an empire and a strong monarchy in India. But none of them succeeded. Babur, on the other hand, was able to establish his dynasty of enterprising rulers and a vast empire in this country. He fought decisive battles in India three times, namely Panipat, Qanwa and Gogra, and won all of them. With this he brought to India the Timurid state administration and laid a solid foundation for it. Indian historian S.R. Sharma compares Bobur to King Henry VII of England. They both overthrew their predecessors and claimants to the throne and established their own dynasty at the head of the state. In this regard, Sharma writes: “In 1526, Zahiruddin Muhammad Babur defeated Ibrahim Lodhi in a battle near Panipat, creating a new era in Indian history and bringing a new dynasty to the throne of Delhi. In the same way, Henry VII, who had won the Battle of the Bosphorus forty years earlier, had established his dynasty and government in England. According to the Indian historian R.P. Tripati, "the triumph of the Baburi Empire was due not only to its military might, but

Published by “ INTER SCIENCE" http://ihm.iscience.uz/index.php/ijihm

IJDIIE Volume: 01 Issue: 02 | September 2020 also to the fact that it exercised freedom of religion in its policies and made a great contribution to cultural life." This policy was initiated by Babur. 3. DISCUSSION Babur not only showed how to build a new empire, but also taught the policy of governing this empire. The dynasty he established in India and its traditions cannot be found in any other country. Babur did not even claim the caliphate as head of state and did not feel a religious need in his governing activities. On the contrary, when he was awarded the title of "King", he ruled the country independently in the style of the Timurids. That is why he theoretically changed the administration of the state that ruled in the kingdom of Delhi. This was, of course, the beginning of a policy of religious neutrality in public administration. Although Babur failed to establish a single empire throughout India, his name lives on in our memory because of the royal works he created, especially his autobiographical work. The history of the Timurids has always been in the center of attention of world historians. As the orientalist W. Barthold points out, the researcher of the period of and his descendants “suffers not from the lack of information, but from the abundance. Because they are scattered throughout many libraries, they require a critical review and publication in the first place. Zahiriddin Muhammad Babur's work "Boburnoma" as a historical and literary source is also honored, as it tells about many historical figures, people of literature and art, people of religion, kings and princes, princes, princes and emirs. H. According to Hasanov, the Boburnoma contains more than a thousand place names. T. Nafasov cites exact numbers and writes that "Boburnoma" contains 1406 names and more than 1,100 place names. It is obvious that the opinions of experts on the names of places and the number of people in "Boburnoma" differ significantly. There is no information in the study as to how many of the above approximate figures belong to Movarounnahr. Therefore, we have tried to clarify these issues below. A total of 1,540 names are mentioned in the Boburnoma. 357 of them are historical figures of Movarounnahr. The rest are historical figures who lived in different periods, in different countries. Movarounnahr consists of 357 historical figures of different categories. Including 5 amirs and nobles; 20 kings and princes; 42 princesses and royal daughters; 52 Umaros, army chiefs and beys; 21 are religious and mystical; 30 people of science and literature; The names of 187 different people - soldiers, peasants, artists, craftsmen, slaves, oilmen - were mentioned and commented on. In the work of Zahiriddin Muhammad Babur "Boburnoma" we see the names and information about 25 emirs and nobles of Movarounnahr. The author gives information about the rulers of Movarounnahr, first of all, about his father Umarshaikh . At this point, it should be noted that Babur developed a unique way of describing the life and work of the rulers. First of all, he mentioned the names of the rulers, such as "Valodat and Nasabi", "Shape and Shamaili", "Ethics and Attitude", "Distance and Wars", "Province", "Generation", "Khavatun and Sarari", "Umarosi". below describes the information about them in order. Babur's work is based on the above-mentioned order in describing the information about Umarshaikh Mirza, Sultan Ahmad Mirza, Sultan Mahmud Mirza, Boysungur Mirza and Sultan Hussein Mirza. Giving information about Umarshaikh Mirza's "birth and genealogy", the author writes: "He was in in eight hundred and sixty. Sultan Abusaid was the fourth son of Mirza. Sultan Ahmad Mirza, Sultan Muhammad Mirza, Sultan Mahmud Mirzodin were younger. Sultan Abusaid Mirza was the son of Sultan Muhammad Mirza. Sultan Muhammad Mirza was the son of Mironshah Mirza. Mironshah was the third son of Mirzo Temurbek. It should be noted that from ancient times in Muslim nations it was a tradition for future generations to know the seven ancestors, that is, the "seven sprouts". In keeping with this tradition, Babur focuses on a number of historical figures in his work, trying to provide accurate genealogical information about their past seven ancestors, their

Published by “ INTER SCIENCE" http://ihm.iscience.uz/index.php/ijihm

IJDIIE Volume: 01 Issue: 02 | September 2020 genealogy. Umarshaikh Mirza's "Khawatun wa Sarori" states that his mother, Kutlug Nigorkhanim, was a descendant of Genghis Khan, the second son of his grandfather Yunus Khan. Temurkhan ibn esan Bugakhan ibn Duvakhan Baraqan ibn Esun Tuva ibn Mutagon ibn Chigataykhan ibn Chingizkhan. The author has a clear approach to events in giving feedback on each ruler. It is not difficult to see that he had a high memory and a keen historian, especially in writing the events narrated by the rulers in the dhikr of “Distances and Wars”. For example, Sultan Hussein spoke about the distances and wars of Mirza, saying, In other words, Sultan Abu Sa'id Mirza Muhammad Ali Bakhshi sent three thousand men in advance. Sultan Husayn Mirza came with sixty young men and touched him. This is a good deed and a demonstration of Sultan Hussein Mirza. ” gives information about his dozens of struggles.

References: Nuriddinov M. The Baburi dynasty. - T .: “Fan”, 1994. p.46. Shamsutdinov R., Abdullaev F., Abdullaev M. The kingdom of the great Baburis. - Andijon: “Meros”, 1995. 121 pages. L.P. Sharma. Kingdom of the Baburids. - T .: “Spirituality”, 1998. p.27. Qudratullaev H. Bobur's State Policy and Diplomacy. - T .: “Sharq”, 2011. 29-p. Azamat Ziyo. History of Uzbek statehood. - T .: “Sharq”, 2001. 35 pages. Khasanov H. Babur is a tourist and naturalist. - T .: “Uzbekistan”, 1983. p.62. Nafasov T. Bobur is a nominee. - Tashkent: 2002. Page 39. Zahiriddin Muhammad Bobur. Boburnoma. - Tashkent: “Yulduzcha”, 1989. Page 12. The work shown. Pages 38-39. The work shown. Page 44.

Published by “ INTER SCIENCE" http://ihm.iscience.uz/index.php/ijihm