DOCSLIB.ORG

The Origins of the Geometric Probability in England

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Origins of the Geometric Probability in England WDS'08 Proceedings of Contributed Papers, Part I, 7–12, 2008. ISBN 978-80-7378-065-4 © MATFYZPRESS The Origins of the Geometric Probability in England A. Kalousov´a Czech Technical University in Prague, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Prague, Czech Republic. Abstract. This article describes the origins of the geometric probability from the first intuitive examples in the 17th century (Newton, Halley). We recall the Buffon’s problems and their generalizations by Barbier, Crofton and, in particular, by Todhunter. Introduction The geometric probability is not taught at elementary and secondary schools, it is seldom taught at universities even though it is frequently used in medicine, crystallography, materials science, biology, ecology and in common life too. The main feature of geometric probability is that the random events are measured and not counted (both numbers of favourable and considered events have the cardinality of continuum). Very roughly speaking, whereas in the common probability, e.g., the chance of throwing six is calculated, in geometric probability the chance of hitting a target or its part is estimated. The origins of geometric probability Usually, Georges-Louis Leclerc, comte de Buffon (1707–1788) is considered to be the first who used geometry for computation of probability. But the first examples can be found nearly one century ago in England. The first hesitant steps It was Isaac Newton (1642–1727), who first applied geometry to probability calculation. In his manuscript [Newton, 1967] written sometimes between 1664-1666 stands: “If ye Proportion of the chances for any stake bee irrationall the interest in the stake may bee found after ye same manner. As if ye Radij ab, ac, divide ye horizontal circle bcd into two pts abec & abdc in such proportion as 2 to √5. And if a ball falling perpendicularly upon ye center a doth tumble into ye portion abec I winn (a): but if into ye other portion, I win b, my hopes is worth 2a+b√5 ”. 2+√5 Newton’s intention was to show that a chance of a simple event could be irrational and he unwittingly discovered the basic rule of geometric probability, namely measurement instead of computing. Newton’s manuscript is only a few pages long and it remained unknown to his contemporaries. The first who applied geometric probability intentionally in a published work was Edmond Halley (1656–1742). In his memoir [Halley, 1693] he deduced formulas for various annuities at first analytically and then, according to the fashion of the time, he added their geometric illustration. To France for a while The first difficult problem in geometric probability was examined in France. Young Georges- Louis Leclerc, later comte de Buffon, wanting to join the French Royal Academy of Sciences (Acad´emie Royale des Sciences) formulated and solved two problems in which he introduced differential and integral calculus into probability theory. Buffon’s M´emoire sur le jeu de franc- carreau was presented in the Academy in April 1733 and the reports from academicians Pierre 7 KALOUSOVA: GEOMETRIC PROBABILITY Louis Maupertuis (1698–1759) and Alexis Claude Clairaut (1713–1765) were commendatory. In January 1734 Buffon joined the Academy, section of mechanics. But he was interested more and more in botany. In March 1739, he transfered to section of botany and in July 1739 he became Keeper of the King’s Garden (Jardin du Roi). Therefore, Buffon is best known as naturalist and author of Histoire naturelle, g´en´erale et particuli`ere (1749–1778 in 36 volumes, 8 additional volumes published after his death by Lac´ep`ede). In [Buffon, 1777] the problems from M´emoire sur le jeu de franc-carreau were included. Buffon claims in the 23rd section that up to the present time arithmetic has been the only instrument used in estimating probabilities and he promises to show examples which would require the aid of geometry. Then he shows three types of such examples. The first is the generalization of the game franc-carreau where a round coin is thrown at random down on a large plane area divided into regular figures (squares, equilateral triangles, or regular hexagons) and the chance that it will fall clear off the bounding lines of the figure (position franc-carreau), or hit one of them, or two of them, and so on, is required.1 He solves them using only simple calculation without any need of the integral calculus. The second one is the problem which is now known as Buffon’s Needle Problem. A slender rod is thrown at random down on a large plane area ruled with equidistant parallel straight lines; one of the players bets that the rod will not cross any of the lines while the other bets that the rod will cross several of them. The odds for these two players are required.2 Buffon 2b 2b solves the problem correctly using integral calculus and shows that the odds are (1 πa ):( πa ) where 2a is the distance between the parallel lines and 2b is the length of the rod (the− inequality b a is assumed to hold). ≤ The third one is a generalization of the previous problem. The plane area on which a rod is thrown down is ruled with a second set of equidistant equally spaced parallel straight lines, oriented at right angles to the former one. Buffon merely gives the result, but it is incorrect. At the end of the 23th section, Buffon proposes to put some questions which can be “in- teresting and useful for common life”, for example: to what extent do we risk when we pass a river on a plank (less or more wide), how much should we be afraid of a lightning or of a bomb etc. The basic and new feature of these problems, namely comparison of measures (lengths), was unnoticed by Buffon’s contemporaries and a considerable attention arose only to the occurrence of π in a probabilistic formula. Pierre-Simon de Laplace (1749–1827) suggests in [Laplace, 1812] to turn the needle problem and use it to determine the value of π. He mentions both needle problems without any reference to Buffon and gives the correct solution of the problem with two systems of parallel straight lines. In the half of 19th century, the geometric probability returned to England. It was Isaac Todhunter (1820–1888), who had known Buffon’s problems and began to study them. Isaac Todhunter Life and work Isaac Todhunter was born at Rye, Sussex, 23rd November 1820, as the second son of George Todhunter, Congregationalist minister, and Mary, his wife. Father died when Isaac was 1Dans une chambre parquet´ee ou pav´ee de carreaux ´egaux, d’une figure quelconque, on jette en l’air un ´ecu; l’un des joueurs parie que cet ´ecu apr`es sa chute se trouvera `afranc-carreau, c’est-`a/dire, sur une seul carreau; le second parie que cet ´ecu se trouvera sur deux carreaux, c’est-`a-dire, qu’il couvrira un des joints qui les s´eparent; un troisi`eme joueur parie que l’´ecu se trouvera sur deux joints; un quatri`eme parie que l’´ecu se trouvera sur trois, quatre ou six joints; on demande les sorts de chacun de ces joueurs. 2Je suppose que dans une chambre, dont le parquet est simplement divis´epar les joints parall`eles, on jette en l’air une baguette, & que l’un des joueurs parie que la baguette ne croisera aucune des parall`eles du parquet, & que l’autre au contraire parie que la baguette croisera quelques-unes de ces parall`eles; on demande le sort de ces deux joueurs. On peut jouer ce jeu sur un damier avec une aiguille `acoudre ou une ´epingle sans tˆete. 8 KALOUSOVA: GEOMETRIC PROBABILITY six years old and left family in narrow circumstances. The widow with four sons decided to move to Hastings and open a girls’ school. Isaac was sent to a boys’ school in Hastings and subsequently to a new school set by J.B. Austin from London. Under this new teacher he made rapid progress. After leaving school he became an assistant school master with J.B. Austin at a school in Pecham and attended simultaneously evening classes at University College, London, where his lecturer was Augustus De Morgan (1806–1871). In 1839 he passed the matriculation exami- nation of the University of London, in 1842 he passed the B.A. examination and in 1844 he obtained the degree of M.A. with the gold medal. One of his lecturers at the University was also James Joseph Sylvester (1814–1897). In 1844 Todhunter entered St John’s College, Cambridge, where he was senior wrangler in 1848, and gained the first Smith’s prize and Burney prize. In 1849 he was elected to a fellowship, and began his life of college lecturer and private tutor. Mathematicians Peter Guthrie Tait (1831–1901) and Edward John Routh (1831–1907) were among his pupils. Todhunter was very successful as a lecturer and it was not long before he began to publish textbooks on the subjects of his lectures. Most of his textbooks passed through many editions and have been widely used in Great Britain and North America. Let us remind some of them: Treatise on the Differential Calculus and the Elements of the Integral Calculus (1852), Treatise on Analytical Statics (1853), Treatise on Integral Calculus (1857), Treatise on Algebra (1857), Treatise on Plane Coordinate Geometry (1858), Examples of Analytical Geometry of Three Dimensions (1858), Plane Trigonometry (1859), Spherical Trigonometry (1859), Theory of Equations (1861), Mechanics (1867), Researches in the Calculus of Variations (1871), Elementary Treatise on Laplace’s, Lame’s and Bessel’s Functions (1875).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Euclid's Elements - Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia
    Euclid's Elements - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euclid's_Elements Euclid's Elements From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Euclid's Elements (Ancient Greek: Στοιχεῖα Stoicheia) is a mathematical and geometric treatise Elements consisting of 13 books written by the ancient Greek mathematician Euclid in Alexandria c. 300 BC. It is a collection of definitions, postulates (axioms), propositions (theorems and constructions), and mathematical proofs of the propositions. The thirteen books cover Euclidean geometry and the ancient Greek version of elementary number theory. The work also includes an algebraic system that has become known as geometric algebra, which is powerful enough to solve many algebraic problems,[1] including the problem of finding the square root of a number.[2] With the exception of Autolycus' On the Moving Sphere, the Elements is one of the oldest extant Greek mathematical treatises,[3] and it is the oldest extant axiomatic deductive treatment of mathematics. It has proven instrumental in the development of logic and modern science. The name 'Elements' comes from the plural of 'element'. The frontispiece of Sir Henry Billingsley's first According to Proclus the term was used to describe a English version of Euclid's Elements, 1570 theorem that is all-pervading and helps furnishing proofs of many other theorems. The word 'element' is Author Euclid, and translators in the Greek language the same as 'letter'. This Language Ancient Greek, translations suggests that theorems in the Elements should be seen Subject Euclidean geometry, elementary as standing in the same relation to geometry as letters number theory to language.
    [Show full text]
  • The Book and Printed Culture of Mathematics in England and Canada, 1830-1930
    Paper Index of the Mind: The Book and Printed Culture of Mathematics in England and Canada, 1830-1930 by Sylvia M. Nickerson A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Institute for the History and Philosophy of Science and Technology University of Toronto © Copyright by Sylvia M. Nickerson 2014 Paper Index of the Mind: The Book and Printed Culture of Mathematics in England and Canada, 1830-1930 Sylvia M. Nickerson Doctor of Philosophy Institute for the History and Philosophy of Science and Technology University of Toronto 2014 Abstract This thesis demonstrates how the book industry shaped knowledge formation by mediating the selection, expression, marketing, distribution and commercialization of mathematical knowledge. It examines how the medium of print and the practices of book production affected the development of mathematical culture in England and Canada during the nineteenth and early twentieth century. Chapter one introduces the field of book history, and discusses how questions and methods arising from this inquiry might be applied to the history of mathematics. Chapter two looks at how nineteenth century printing technologies were used to reproduce mathematics. Mathematical expressions were more difficult and expensive to produce using moveable type than other forms of content; engraved diagrams required close collaboration between author, publisher and engraver. Chapter three examines how editorial decision-making differed at book publishers compared to mathematical journals and general science journals. Each medium followed different editorial processes and applied distinct criteria in decision-making about what to publish. ii Daniel MacAlister, Macmillan and Company’s reader of science, reviewed mathematical manuscripts submitted to the company and influenced which ones would be published as books.
    [Show full text]
  • Horner Versus Holdred
    Historia Mathematica 26 (1999), 29–51 Article ID hmat.1998.2214, available online at http://www.idealibrary.com on Horner versus Holdred: An Episode in the History View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk of Root Computation brought to you by CORE provided by Elsevier - Publisher Connector A. Thomas Fuller Hillcrest, The Common, Woodgreen, Fordingbridge, Hants SP6 2BQ, England It is well known that Horner’s method for the computation of a real root of a polynomial equa- tion was anticipated in Italy by Ruffini. In the present paper it is shown that in England the method was published by Holdred, before Horner. The resulting controversy over priority is discussed, and related letters from contemporary mathematicians are reproduced. It is concluded that the dissemi- nation of the algorithm under the inappropriate designation “Horner’s method” is mainly due to De Morgan. C 1999 Academic Press Il est bien connu que la m´ethodede Horner pour calculer une racine re´elled’une ´equationpolynˆome avait ´et´eanticip´eeen Italie par Ruffini. Dans ce papier il est d´emontr´equ’en Angleterre la m´ethodefut publi´eepar Holdred avant Horner. La controverse sur la priorit´eest discut´ee,et des lettres de math´e- maticiens contemporains sont reproduites. Il est conclu que la diss´eminationde l’algorithme sous la d´esignation inappropri´ee“m´ethodede Horner” est principalement duea ` De Morgan. C 1999 Academic Press MSC 1991 subject classifications: 01A55; 01A70; 01A80; 65-03. Key Words: root computation; synthetic division; Horner; Holdred; De Morgan. 1. INTRODUCTION The algorithm for the computation of a real root of a polynomial equation with given numerical coefficients known as “Horner’s method” is described in many textbooks, for example Herbert Turnbull [73, 25–26, 30–33, 83–88] and James Uspensky [74, 151–169].
    [Show full text]
  • The Project Gutenberg Ebook #31061: a History of Mathematics
    The Project Gutenberg EBook of A History of Mathematics, by Florian Cajori This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org Title: A History of Mathematics Author: Florian Cajori Release Date: January 24, 2010 [EBook #31061] Language: English Character set encoding: ISO-8859-1 *** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK A HISTORY OF MATHEMATICS *** Produced by Andrew D. Hwang, Peter Vachuska, Carl Hudkins and the Online Distributed Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net transcriber's note Figures may have been moved with respect to the surrounding text. Minor typographical corrections and presentational changes have been made without comment. This PDF file is formatted for screen viewing, but may be easily formatted for printing. Please consult the preamble of the LATEX source file for instructions. A HISTORY OF MATHEMATICS A HISTORY OF MATHEMATICS BY FLORIAN CAJORI, Ph.D. Formerly Professor of Applied Mathematics in the Tulane University of Louisiana; now Professor of Physics in Colorado College \I am sure that no subject loses more than mathematics by any attempt to dissociate it from its history."|J. W. L. Glaisher New York THE MACMILLAN COMPANY LONDON: MACMILLAN & CO., Ltd. 1909 All rights reserved Copyright, 1893, By MACMILLAN AND CO. Set up and electrotyped January, 1894. Reprinted March, 1895; October, 1897; November, 1901; January, 1906; July, 1909. Norwood Pre&: J. S. Cushing & Co.|Berwick & Smith.
    [Show full text]
  • Unpublished Letters of James Joseph Sylvester and Other New Information Concerning His Life and Work Author(S): Raymond Clare Archibald Source: Osiris, Vol
    Unpublished Letters of James Joseph Sylvester and Other New Information concerning His Life and Work Author(s): Raymond Clare Archibald Source: Osiris, Vol. 1 (Jan., 1936), pp. 85-154 Published by: The University of Chicago Press on behalf of The History of Science Society Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/301603 . Accessed: 06/03/2014 07:56 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. The University of Chicago Press and The History of Science Society are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Osiris. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 159.237.12.82 on Thu, 6 Mar 2014 07:56:26 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions UnpublishedLetters of JamesJoseph Sylvesterand othernew Information concerninghis Life and Work CONTENTS 1. - Introductory. II. -Curriculum Vitae. III. Publications dealing with SYLVEsTER'sLife and Work. IV. SyLv1EsTER'sFirst Mathematical Publication. V. -SYLvESTER and the Universityof Virginia. VI. SYLVESTER, i842-I855. VII. SYLVEsTER'S Poetry. VIII. Letters of SyLvEsTER. I. - INTRODUCTORY In yesteryearsthere were two gloriously inspiring centers of mathematical study in America. One of these was at -the University of Chicago, when BOLZA, and MASCHKE and E.
    [Show full text]
  • Referees, Publisher's Readers and the Image Of
    REFEREES, PUBLISHER’S READERS AND THE IMAGE OF MATHEMATICS IN NINETEENTH CENTURY ENGLAND by SYLVIA NICKERSON In the realm of publishing history it is well known that many of London’s largest nineteenth century publishers hired publisher’s readers to advise them about which literary manuscripts they should publish. Moreover, it has been recognized that these readers often acted as tastemakers and had a hand in shaping the development of literature. Publisher’s readers had a similar effect in relation to the genres of science and mathematics. At Macmillan and Company, publisher’s readers and close advisors to the publisher influenced decisions about which books were published on scientific and mathematical topics. In 1880, Macmillan and Company hired a publisher’s reader to specifically handle the science genre. The chosen reader, Donald MacAlister, also reviewed manuscripts in mathematics, and between 1880 and 1896 MacAlister wrote more than sixty reviews about prospective mathematical books that were being considered for publication. During this time he also wrote reviews evaluating manuscripts in other areas of science. While some observations about his work as a science reader are included, the purpose here is to focus specifically on MacAlister’s influence on Macmillan’s mathematical publishing program. The current article demonstrates that, when publishing on mathematical subjects, the decision-making of book publishers differed from that of mathematical journals. The values that underpinned the decision-making process were different at mathematics journals, general science journals and the book publishers that published mathematics. Each set of values affected the image of mathematics that was cultivated. The article examines the processes of refereeing, and the role of the editor, at nineteenth century mathematical journals by looking at the Cambridge Mathematical Journal and Acta Mathematica.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 1 Neither Indeed Would I Have Put My Selfe to the Labour Of
    Notes Neither indeed would I have put my selfe to the labour of writing any Notes at all, if the booke could as well have wanted them, as I could easilie have found as well, or better to my minde, how to bestow my time. Marcus Aurelius Antoninus. Chapter 1 1. This description is from Hacking's introduction to the English trans­ lation of Maistrov [1974, p.vii]. 2. Forsaking, in this respect, what is described in the 14th edition [1939] of the Encyclopaedia Britannica as its "career of plain usefulness" [vol. 3, p.596]. A supplementary volume of the Dictionary, soon to be published, will contain a note on Thomas Bayes. 3. See Barnard [1958, p.293]. 4. The note, by Thomas Fisher, LL.D., reads in its entirety as follows: "Bayes, Thomas, a presbyterian minister, for some time assistant to his father, Joshua Bayes, but afterwards settled as pastor of a con­ gregation at Tunbridge Wells, where he died, April 17, 1761. He was F.R.S., and distinguished as a mathematician. He took part in the controversy on fluxions against Bishop Berkeley, by publishing an anonymous pamphlet, entitled "An Introduction to the Doctrine of Fluxions, and Defence of the Mathematicians against the Author of the Analyst," London, 1736, 8vo. He is the author of two math­ ematical papers in the Philosophical Transactions. An anonymous tract by him, under the title of "Divine Benevolence" , in reply to one on Divine Rectitude, by John Balguy, likewise anonymous, attracted much attention." For further comments on this reference see Ander­ son [1941, p.161].
    [Show full text]
  • Roberto Rossi 2008 University College Cork, Ireland Brahim Hnich 2003 Uppsala Universiteit, Sweden Toby Walsh 1990 University Of
    Niccolo Fontana Tartaglia Ostilio Ricci Universita di Brescia, I Galileo di Vincenzo Bonaiuti de' Galilei 1585 Universita di Pisa, I Benedetto Castelli 1610 Universita di Padova, I Evangelista Torricelli Marin Mersenne 1610 1611 Università di Roma La Sapienza, I Université Paris IV-Sorbonne, F Bonaventura Cavalieri 1619 Gilles Personne de Roberval Frans van Schooten, Jr. Universita di Pisa, I Vincenzo Viviani 1635 1642 Universiteit Leiden, NL Universita di Pisa, I Blaise Pascal Christiaan Huygens 1647 Isaac Barrow Benjamin Pulleyn Universiteit Leiden, NL 1652 1657 University of Cambridge, UK University of Cambridge, UK Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz 1666 Universität Leipzig, GER Isaac Newton 1668 Nicolas Malebranche University of Cambridge, UK 1672 Pierre Varignon Christian M. von Wolff Roger Cotes 1687 1703 1706 Académie royale des sciences de Paris, F Universität Leipzig, GER University of Cambridge, UK Jacques Cassini 1691 Robert Smith Université de Paris, F Jacob Bernoulli 1715 1684 University of Cambridge, UK Universität Basel, CH Walter Taylor 1723 University of Cambridge, UK Martin Knutzen 1732 Universität Königsberg, GER Stephen Whisson 1742 University of Cambridge, UK Thomas Postlethwaite 1756 Edward Waring University of Cambridge, UK Henry Bracken 1757 University of Cambridge, UK John Dawson 1765 Immanuel Kant John Cranke University College London, UK 1770 1774 Universität Königsberg, GER University of Cambridge, UK Thomas Jones 1782 University of Cambridge, UK Adam Sedgwick 1811 University of Cambridge, UK William Hopkins Isaac Todhunter 1830 1848 University of Cambridge, UK University College London, UK Sir. George Gabriel Stokes Sir. Francis Galton 1841 1847 James Clerk Maxwell University of Cambridge, UK University of Cambridge, UK Edward John Routh 1854 1857 University of Cambridge, UK University of Cambridge, UK John William Strutt (Lord Rayleigh) Sir.
    [Show full text]
  • Isaac Todhunter1
    Chapter 10 ISAAC TODHUNTER1 (1820-1884) Isaac Todhunter was born at Rye, Sussex, 23 Nov., 1820. He was the second son of George Todhunter, Congregationalist minister of the place, and of Mary his wife, whose maiden name was Hume, a Scottish surname. The minister died of consumption when Isaac was six years old, and left his family, consisting of wife and four boys, in narrow circumstances. The widow, who was a woman of strength, physically and mentally, moved to the larger town of Hastings in the same county, and opened a school for girls. After some years Isaac was sent to a boys’ school in the same town kept by Robert Carr, and subsequently to one newly opened by a Mr. Austin from London; for some years he had been unusually backward in his studies, but under this new teacher he made rapid progress, and his career was then largely determined. After his school days were over, he became an usher or assistant master with Mr. Austin in a school at Peckham; and contrived to attend at the same time the evening classes at University College, London. There he came under the great educating influence of De Morgan, for whom in after years he always expressed an unbounded admiration; to De Morgan “he owed that interest in the history and bibliography of science, in moral philosophy and logic which determined the course of his riper studies.” In 1839 he passed the matriculation examination of the University of London, then a merely examining body, winning the exhibition for mathematics (£30 for two years); in 1842 he passed the B.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Mathematics in the Metropolis: a Survey of Victorian London
    HISTORIA MATHEMATICA 23 (1996), 376±417 ARTICLE NO. 0039 Mathematics in the Metropolis: A Survey of Victorian London ADRIAN RICE School of Mathematics and Statistics, Middlesex University, Bounds Green, View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk London N11 2NQ, United Kingdom brought to you by CORE provided by Elsevier - Publisher Connector This paper surveys the teaching of university-level mathematics in various London institu- tions during the reign of Queen Victoria. It highlights some of the famous mathematicians who were involved for many years as teachers of this mathematics, including Augustus De Morgan, James Joseph Sylvester, and Karl Pearson. The paper also investigates the wide variety of teaching establishments, including mainly academic institutions (University College, King's College), the military colleges (Royal Military Academy, Woolwich and Royal Naval College, Greenwich), the women's colleges (Bedford and Queen's), and the technical colleges and polytechnics (e.g., Central Technical Institute) which began to appear during the latter part of this period. A comparison of teaching styles and courses offered is a fruitful way of exploring the rich development of university-level mathematics in London between 1837 and 1901. 1996 Academic Press, Inc. Cet ouvrage examine dans son ensemble l'enseignement matheÂmatique au niveau universi- taire dans diverses institutions aÁ Londres pendant la reÁgne de la Reine Victoria. Nous soulig- nons quelques matheÂmaticiens ceÂleÁbres qui participeÁrent dans ce milieu, par exemple, Au- gustus De Morgan, James Joseph Sylvester, et Karl Pearson. En plus, nous analysons les diverses grandes eÂcoles d'enseignement, y compris surtout des institutions acadeÂmiques (Uni- versity College, King's College), des eÂcoles militaires (Royal Military Academy, Woolwich et Royal Naval College, Greenwich), des eÂcoles de femmes (Bedford et Queen's), et des eÂcoles techniques et polytechniques (par exemple, Central Technical Institute) qui commencËaient aÁ apparaõÃtre durant la dernieÁre partie de cette peÂriode.
    [Show full text]
  • Euclid's Elements
    BSHM Bulletin Volume 21 (2006), 2–25 ‘Much necessary for all sortes of men’: 450 years of Euclid’s Elements in English June Barrow-Green Open University This talk, given at the BSHM Textbooks Meeting in September 2005, is in two parts. First it looks at some of the English editions of the Elements published over the last 450 years. Then, to show how various editors differed in the way they approached the text, it looks at their treatments of Pythagoras’ Theorem (Book I, Proposition 47). Finally, it draws attention to some texts from the Fauvel Collection that either derive from the Elements or are closely connected with it. Introduction uclid’s Elements is the most famous mathematics textbook of all time, and so seems an appropriate subject to start off a meeting on mathematical E textbooks. I have never studied ancient Greek, however, and my Latin is of the schoolgirl variety, so in this paper I will restrict myself to some of the many editions of the Elements published in English. Rather than debate the finer points of the mathematics contained in them, I want to concentrate on some of their other features, such as printing, layout, authors’ notes, frontispieces, dedications, etc. In other words, I want to focus on those things that give you information about the general context in which a book was published. For the most part, I shall not be providing a detailed analysis or interpretation of these features but rather I shall be identifying them and indicating how they may be used to enrich our understanding of the milieu in which the texts were produced and used.
    [Show full text]
  • Works on John Grote
    BOOKS, ARTICLES AND MANUSCRIPTS WHICH REFER TO JOHN GROTE. Acton, H.B., (ed.) 1972 Utilitarianism, On Liberty and Considerations on Representative Government by John Stuart Mill, London. Adamson, J. W. 1930 English Education 1789-1902, Cambridge Albee, E., 1901 A History of English Utilitarianism, London. Alexander, S., 1906 Moral Order and Progress, London. 157. 214-215, 244. Allen, P., 1978 The Cambridge Apostles, Cambridge. Anon, 1860 ‘Cambridge University Reform’, The British Quarterly Review, July, 206-230 contains an attack on Grote’s lack of teaching. 224-225. ---- 1865 Review of Grote's ‘Exploratio Philosophica’ Part I, Westminster Review XXVIII, 516-517 ---- 1865a Review of John Grote's ‘Exploratio Philosophica’, Part I, The Saturday Review, XX, 22-23. ---- 1866a 'Obituary to John Grote', in Gentleman's Magazine, 2(N.S.), 221;(O.S.), 549-550. ---- 1866b 'Obituary' in Church Guardian 2 August 1866 (copied in Gentleman's Magazine, 2,(N.S.), 221;(O.S.), 549-550. ---- 1870 Review of John Grote's ‘An Examination of the Utilitarian Philosophy’, Saturday Review, August 13th, 205-207. ---- 1871 Review of Grote's ‘Examination of the Utilitarian Philosophy’, The Westminster Review, 95, (New Series xxxix,, 41-53. ---- 1874 'Moral Philosophy & Cambridge', The Westminster Review XLV, 430-- 464. ---- 1876 Review of Isaac Todhunter's writings and letters of Dr Whewell, The Saturday Review, XLI, 621-622. ---- 1876a Review of John Grote's ‘A Treatise on the Moral Ideals’, The Westminster Review [107] L1, 222-224. ---- 1876b, Review of John Grote ‘A Treatise on the Moral Ideals’, Athenaeum, 2565, December 23rd, 829-830. --- 1936 “’Review of The Problem of Philosophy in Scottish Philosophy’, by Torgny T.
    [Show full text]