Security Council #11

Papua Conflict

I. Background

The Conflict, an ongoing conflict between the Indonesian government and the indigenous peoples of Papua, has its roots during the period of decolonization that took place in the latter half of the 20th Century. The Netherlands, who had placed a major focus on the region known as the Indies, had come to depend on this territory economically, as it accounted for 20% of the world’s tea supply, 35% of the world's rubber supply, 25% of the world’s coconut supply, and a large portion of the world’s quinine and oil supplies. Following the events of the Second World War, was was granted independence by the Japanese, who had seized the in 1942. Due to its aforementioned economic value, the Dutch clung to whatever territory it could, among which was the western half of the island of New Guinea. Indonesia disagreed with this claim, stating that the whole of the Dutch East Indies should be ceded to them. While the Netherlands tried to hold to their policy of administering the island until it was deemed capable of self determination, the pro-Indonesian United States eventually pressured them into signing the land off to the UN Temporary Executive Authority until a plebiscite could be held. This vote, dubbed the , was overseen by the Indonesian military in 1969, during which a group of only 1,022 Papuan voters, who’d been hand chosen by the military, were held at gunpoint and told to vote for integration into Indonesia. Despite the constituency of this vote consisting of less than 1% of those eligible to take part in it, its results were considered final and the region of West New Guinea was incorporated into the Indonesian nation. It is from this event that Papuan resistance, namely via the (OPM), against Indonesian rule arose. In the past, these groups have cited numerous grievances with the Indonesian treatment of the West Papuan people. One such grievance is with the Act of Free Choice, specifically claiming that the transfer of Dutch power to Indonesia rather than the granting of independence was a fundamentally unjust decision. The next grievance is the tendency for the Indonesian government to violate the human rights of the Papuan people. This issue stems from the fact that West Papua is still held under what is essentially martial law, as over 15,000 Indonesian troops are stationed in the region specifically for the purpose of maintaining order. It is often cited that between 100,000-500,000 people have been killed in West Papua by the Indonesian military since 1963, though this statistic is questionable due to the degree of secrecy that Indonesia has maintained about the matter. A more certain figure was reported by the International Coalition for Papua is that between 2013 and 2014 there were 22 extrajudicial killings in the region. On top of this, the Indonesian government has been known to arrest peaceful demonstrators and subject them to various forms of torture. During the same one-year period mentioned above it was found that nearly 900 individuals were convicted under political pretenses, 370 of which reported inhumane treatment by their captors. The conflict has involved violence since it began, but in recent years this violence has become particularly brutal. The uptick in violence began in December of 2009, when the leader of the OPM, Kelly Kwalik, was killed in a police raid. The officers involved in this killing were then given recommendations for their actions, inciting anger amongst Papuan citizens. The year following showed a number of skirmishes between rebels and the Indonesian police and military. These cases often resulted in at least a single casualty on either side, rarely reaching numbers higher than three deaths in any single instance. Indonesian officials also began blaming numerous unsolved civilian killings on rebel movements in order to discredit them. The media took notice of the conflict in October of 2011, when Al Jazeera published footage of an attack by Indonesian militants on a independence movement meeting. The attack resulted in five casualties, as well as hundreds of arrests on suspected freedom advocates. Similar attacks have continued up to the past few years. In January of 2018 the West Papua Liberation Army declared war on the Indonesian state. Following this, violent conflicts have broken out in regions across West Papua. For example, the Liberation army killed a taxi driver in the region of Lanny Jaya in November of 2018. The Army claims that the man was believed to be an Indonesian intelligence worker, and were told that the man had been spying on them. This killing prompted a response from the Indonesian government, which itself resulted in the deaths of two Liberation Army members. The military also accuses the Army of having killed an innocent child and a fleeing civilian during that same month in Lanny Jaya. In the Nduga region, the Liberation Army was accused of taking 15 teachers as hostages. This claim, according to the Army, is false, and the teachers that had reportedly been working for the Indonesian government were simply “kept quiet” at a monthly meeting. This controversy brought with it the alleged increased stationing of Indonesian military officials in West Papua, although the military denies these claims. In December of 2018, the Liberation Army took credit for killing of 31 construction workers in the center of the region. Known as the Nduga Massacre, this attack was the deadliest of the conflict in years, and the Indonesian government began immediate military retaliation over it. Within the month, it was reported by newspapers in the region that the Indonesian military had used white phosphorus on the region of Nduga, although this claim was promptly denied by the government. International involvement in the conflict is scarce, with the majority of its participants being located within the general vicinity of Papua itself. Papua New Guinea is on record as having called for the issue to be brought to the UN decolonization board, as well as directly involving itself by taking in refugees displaced by the conflict. It, along with the neighboring nations of Vanuatu and the Solomon Islands, publicly stated their support for the Papuan self determination in 2017. There are also a few nations from Europe that have become involved in this crisis, namely Poland and Ukraine. Poland as a nation has not officially involved itself in West Papua. However, a Polish national was arrested in the region in September of 2018 for allegedly conspiring against the Indonesian government. This man, Jakub Fabian Skrzypski, was accused of dealing arms to the OPM, as well as teaching them how to use these weapons. Photos of him posing with members of the organization were also found on his phone. There is no proof of this man’s ties to the Polish government, however, there is speculation as to whether or not he is a volunteer for the Polish Armed Forces. Likewise, a Ukrainian paramilitary organization was affiliated with the training of an Australian national in 2012. The Australian man had allegedly created a Facebook page dedicated to his advocacy for Papuan liberation. Buried within the photos on this page were images depicting armory, including within it a rocket-propelled grenade launcher. The man was apprehended in Australia on his way to West Papua, where he was meant to meet with liberation activists to discuss the training and arming of Papuan militants. The only other foreign involvement in the conflict is by proxy of state-sponsored organizations. The UK and Australia, for example, have heavily invested in Rio Tinto, which itself is accused of committing human rights violations against the Papuan peoples. Investment into such a company is considered by many to be implied complacency in Indonesia’s actions, however it should be noted that these same nations have heavily invested in BP following its attempts to incorporate the Papuan people into their workforce more heavily. Also, British politicians such as James Corbyn, Baroness Symons, and Baroness Warsi have stated that the issue is very pressing, with some openly espousing support for the liberation movement. Therefore, while investing nations’ policies on the issue may be judged by their involvement in third parties that themselves are involved in it, the complexity of the conflict and the relative lack of awareness for it make judging foreign policy on the matter difficult for all but the most directly involved nations. Overall, the is a matter that demands Security Council intervention. The conflict between government and revolutionary forces has not only directly caused hundreds of casualties, but has also placed the people of West Papua in the middle of an active warzone. Without direct UN intervention, these people will continue to be endangered, something that the UN cannot afford to allow. II. UN Involvement

The UN’s first involvement in the area of decolonization came with its passing of Resolution 1514, which called for a speedy end to all forms of colonization. The UN first became involved in the Papua Conflict itself when the Dutch and Indonesian governments began to feud over who held claim over West Papua. When the Dutch were eventually pressured into giving the land up, the United Nations Temporary Executive Authority maintained control over the region until a vote could be held to determine its future. Resolution 1752 was passed in 1962, establishing the rules for a plebiscite to be held. That plebiscite took place in the form of the Act of Free Choice in 1969. Despite the fact that the UN recognized the fact that the Indonesian government’s coercion of voters violated the New York Agreement of 1962, the result of the plebiscite was accepted by the UN in Resolution 2504. Since then the UN has scarcely involved itself with the conflict, with only a few major instances of such having occurred since 1969. One such instance was in 2017, when a petition with over 1.8 million signatures was sent to the UN calling for West Papuan independence. In response, the UN’s decolonization committee claimed that they have no jurisdiction to do anything about the conflict, as West Papua is internationally recognised as a part of Indonesia’s sovereign territory. Another instance was in 2018, when an OHCHR spokesperson directly condemned the more than 500 arrests made by Indonesian police against peaceful demonstrators during a holiday commemorating West Papuan independence from the Netherlands. The spokesperson went on to request that Indonesian officials respect the rights of their people to peacefully assemble. The most recent event in which the UN became involved in the conflict was when the General Assembly entertained speakers from several Pacific Islands countries. These speakers called for increased UN involvement in the issue, which was again dismissed due to lack of jurisdiction. Because the UN does not recognize West Papua as a colony it is uncertain to what extent it will even attempt to take action in the future, and unless it suddenly changes this policy it is not likely that the international body will have much further impact on the issue.

III. Questions to Consider 1. In what capacity are global corporations involved in the conflict? To what extent do these corporations reflect the views of the nations that have invested in them? 2. Considering the circumstances under which the Act of Free Choice was held, how firm is the legal foundation of Indonesia’s claim to West Papua? 3. Considering the current status of Western Papua as a part of the Indonesian state, how much authority does the Security Council hold over the Indonesian government? 4. In what regard should the committee hold resistance movements such as OPM and the West Papuan Liberation Army? How should the latter’s contribution to violence in the region be treated? 5. At what point does the industrialization of a region become detrimental to its inhabitants? How does it contribute to the outbreak of violent protest? 6. Which side do the permanent members currently support? How can those who are heavily invested in the economic development of the region be persuaded to place a greater emphasis on ending the violent human rights violations taking place there?

Works Cited 1. “The UK's Involvement in the Papuan Crisis.” New Internationalist, 15 Oct. 2018, newint.org/features/2018/09/11/uks-involvement-papuan-crisis. 2. “Fears for Civilians as West Papuan Conflict Rages.” Radio New Zealand, 9 Nov. 2018, ​ ​ www.radionz.co.nz/international/pacific-news/375570/fears-for-civilians-as-west-papuan -conflict-rages. 3. “The West Papua Conflict and Its Consequences for the Island of New Guinea: Root Causes and the Campaign for Papua, Land of Peace.” Taylor & Francis, ​ ​ www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00358530500331826?src=recsys&journalCode=c trt20. 4. “The Struggle for Self-Determination in West Papua (1969-Present).” ICNC, ​ ​ www.nonviolent-conflict.org/struggle-self-determination-west-papua-1969-present/. 5. Chen, C. Peter. “Dutch East Indies in World War II.” WW2DB, ​ ​ ww2db.com/country/dutch_east_indies. 6. “PNG PM Urges Pacific Countries to Take Papua Issue to UN.” Radio New Zealand, 10 ​ ​ July 2018, www.radionz.co.nz/international/pacific-news/361534/png-pm-urges-pacific-countries-to -take-papua-issue-to-un. 7. Capriati, Marinella. ASSESSMENT REPORT ON THE CONFLICT IN THE WEST ​ PAPUA REGION OF INDONESIA. Politics of Papua Project at the University of ​ Warwick, July 2016, warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/pais/research/researchcentres/ierg/westpapua/papua_assessment_r eport_final_uk_pdf.pdf. 8. “West Papua: Forgotten War, Unwanted People.” Cultural Survival, ​ ​ www.culturalsurvival.org/publications/cultural-survival-quarterly/west-papua-forgotten- war-unwanted-people. 9. Srinivasan, Prianka. “How the UN Failed West Papua.” The Diplomat, The Diplomat, 23 ​ ​ Sept. 2016, thediplomat.com/2016/09/how-the-un-failed-west-papua/. 10. “Fiery Debate over West Papua at UN General Assembly.” Radio New Zealand, 27 Sept. ​ ​ 2017, www.radionz.co.nz/international/programmes/datelinepacific/audio/201860156/fiery-deb ate-over-west-papua-at-un-general-assembly. 11. Doherty, Ben, and Kate Lamb. “West Papua Independence Petition Is Rebuffed at UN.” The Guardian, Guardian News and Media, 30 Sept. 2017, ​ www.theguardian.com/world/2017/sep/30/west-papua-independence-petition-is-rebuffed- at-un. ​ 12. Star, Solomon. “Fears for More Tension in Mimika after Killing of Papua's Kwalik.” Fears for More Tension in Mimika after Killing of Papua's Kwalik, web.archive.org/web/20110614061717/http://www.solomonstarnews.com/news/regional/ 2157-fears-for-more-tension-in-mimika-after-killing-of-papuas-kwalik. 13. Al Jazeera. “Forces Raid Papuan Independence Gathering.” News | Al Jazeera, Al Jazeera, 22 Oct. 2011, www.aljazeera.com/video/asia-pacific/2011/10/2011102234014412547.html. ​ 14. Doherty, Ben. “Melanesian Leaders Condemn UN for Turning 'a Deaf Ear' to West Papua Atrocities.” The Guardian, Guardian News and Media, 24 Sept. 2017, ​ ​ www.theguardian.com/world/2017/sep/24/melanesian-leaders-condemn-un-for-turning-a- deaf-ear-to-west-papua-atrocities. 15. Davidson, Helen. “West Papua: Conflicting Reports Surround Attack That Killed up to 31.” The Guardian, Guardian News and Media, 5 Dec. 2018, ​ ​ www.theguardian.com/world/2018/dec/05/west-papua-fears-of-spiralling-violence-after-a ttack-leaves-up-to-31-dead. 16. Martin, Lisa. “Indonesia Denies Using White Phosphorus in West Papua.” The Guardian, ​ ​ Guardian News and Media, 24 Dec. 2018, www.theguardian.com/world/2018/dec/24/indonesia-denies-using-white-phosphorous-in- west-papua. 17. Davidson, Helen. “Indonesia to Let UN Workers into West Papua as Violence Continues.” The Guardian, Guardian News and Media, 30 Jan. 2019, ​ ​ www.theguardian.com/world/2019/jan/30/indonesia-to-let-un-workers-into-west-papua-a s-violence-continues. 18. Oakes, Dan. “Trained by a Baron and Backed by Bambi, Now West Papua 'Freedom Fighter' Faces Jail.” The Sydney Morning Herald, The Sydney Morning Herald, 6 Dec. ​ ​ 2012, www.smh.com.au/national/trained-by-a-baron-and-backed-by-bambi-now-west-papua-fr eedom-fighter-faces-jail-20121206-2ayc7.html. 19. “Indonesian Police Extend Detention of Polish Man Accused of Papua Rebel Links.” BenarNews, ​ www.benarnews.org/english/news/indonesian/papua-polish-man-09192018145949.html. 20. “Press Briefing Notes on Papua.” OHCHR, www.ohchr.org/en/NewsEvents/Pages/DisplayNews.aspx?NewsID=23990&LangID=E.