DOCSLIB.ORG

Convention Journal 2017

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Convention Journal 2017 The Diocese of Albany A.D. 2017 A part of the Episcopal Church and the worldwide Anglican Communion The Journal of the One Hundred and Forty-Ninth Annual Convention Including selected resources “Let Your Light Shine!” ~ Matthew 5:16 Disciples Making Disciples The Diocese of Albany A.D. 2017 A part of the Episcopal Church and the worldwide Anglican Communion The Journal of the One Hundred and Forty-Ninth Annual Convention Including selected resources “Let Your Light Shine!” ~ Matthew 5:16 The Diocese was organized December 2, 1868. The Journal is published by the Diocese of Albany; edited by the Rev. Marian M. Sive, Secretary of the Diocese 2 Table of Contents Table of Contents .................................................................................................................................................................... 3 The Great Commandment ............................................................................................................................................................ 4 The Great Commission ............................................................................................................................................................... 4 Diocese of Albany Vision ............................................................................................................................................................ 4 Marks of Discipleship and Diocesan Values ............................................................................................................................... 5 Part I. The Annual ................................................................................................................................................................. 6 The Diocesan Directory ............................................................................................................................................................... 6 Diocesan Staff ......................................................................................................................................................................... 6 Clergy, Congregations, Ministries ............................................................................................................................................... 8 The Congregations ....................................................................................................................................................................... 8 Lay Leader Directory ................................................................................................................................................................. 25 Committees, Commissions, Elected Officers, Institutions & Ministries ................................................................................... 28 Friends of the Diocese ............................................................................................................................................................... 37 Deaneries ....................................................................................................................................................................... 38 Official Acts of Bishop Love ..................................................................................................................................................... 41 Clergy in Order of Canonical Residence ................................................................................................................................... 43 Part II. The Annual Convention ...................................................................................................................................... 49 Bishop Love’s Address to the Annual Convention .................................................................................................................... 49 Minutes of the Business Session ................................................................................................................................................ 60 Financing the Missionaries of the Diocese ................................................................................................................................ 69 The Diocesan Budget ................................................................................................................................................................. 69 The 2018 Parish Assessment Schedule ...................................................................................................................................... 63 Assessment Formula for the Diocesan Budget .......................................................................................................................... 67 The 2016 End of Year Parish Assessment Report ..................................................................................................................... 68 The 2017 YTD parish Assessment Report ................................................................................................................................. 81 Reports to the Convention ......................................................................................................................................................... 85 Diocesan Salary and Benefits Committee Report ...................................................................................................................... 85 The 2016 Trustees Report to the Diocese .................................................................................................................................. 87 The Diocesan Development Fund Report .................................................................................................................................. 88 Part III. A Resource Library ............................................................................................................................................... 91 Anglican Resources ................................................................................................................................................................... 91 Episcopal Church Resources ..................................................................................................................................................... 92 Diocesan Resources ................................................................................................................................................................... 92 The Constitution of the Diocese of Albany ............................................................................................................................... 92 The Canons of the Diocese of Albany ....................................................................................................................................... 94 The Rules of Order of the Diocesan Convention ..................................................................................................................... 108 Bishops of the Diocese of Albany ........................................................................................................................................... 112 The Bishop’s Recommended Reading List .............................................................................................................................. 117 Blessed Daniel Nash ................................................................................................................................................................ 119 Sexual Misconduct Policies and Procedures ............................................................................................................................ 121 New York State Resources ...................................................................................................................................................... 124 The Domestic Relations Law of the State of New York .......................................................................................................... 124 The Religious Corporations Law of the State of New York .................................................................................................... 128 3 The Great Commandment “Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind and with all your strength. The second is this: 'Love your neighbor as yourself.' There is no commandment greater than these." - Mark 12:30-31 The Great Commission “Therefore go and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, and teaching them to obey everything I have commanded you.” - Matthew 28:19-20 Prayer for Mission Lord Jesus Christ, you stretched out your arms of love on the hard wood of the cross that everyone might come within the reach of your saving embrace: So clothe us in your spirit that we, reaching forth our hands in love, may bring those who do not know you to the knowledge and love of you; for the honor of your name. Amen. The Book of Common Prayer, top of page 101, written by the Rt. Rev. Charles Henry Brent (see Lesser Feasts and Fasts for March 27) Diocese of Albany Vision The Diocese of Albany is One Church fulfilling the Great Commandment and Great Commission, moving from membership to discipleship; equipping, emboldening, and sending disciples to make disciples. 4 Marks of Discipleship and Diocesan Values Prayer & Worship Worshipping the Lord daily (Psalm 95:1-7, Psalm 96:1-9, Acts 2:46, Romans 12:1) Gathering weekly
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Dean and the Deanery
    7 DIOCESE OF EAST ANGLIA Diocesan policy on THE DEANERY AND THE ROLE OF THE DEAN THE DEANERY How is the universal Catholic Church structured? The whole people of God is a communion of dioceses, each entrusted to the pastoral leadership and care of a bishop. The diocese is then ‘divided into distinct parts or parishes’ (Code of Canon Law, 374.1). Each parish is by nature an integral part of the diocese. What then is a deanery? ‘To foster pastoral care by means of common action, several neighbouring parishes can be joined together in special groupings, such as deaneries’ (Code of Canon Law, 374.2). Each deanery is led by a Dean appointed by the bishop to act in his name. In a scattered diocese such as ours, with many small parishes, working together in deaneries can be very fruitful, not only for the mutual support and care of the clergy, but also for pastoral and spiritual collaboration at local level. In each deanery, there are to be regular meetings of the clergy, priests and deacons, diocesan and religious, of that grouping of parishes. All are expected to attend such meetings and participate as fully as possible in deanery life and work. In each deanery, there are to be regular meetings of lay representatives of each parish with all the clergy of the deanery, so as to facilitate active participation by lay people in local pastoral action and decision-making. The following norms for the role of the Dean came into effect from 21 November 2003. THE ROLE OF THE DEAN 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Preamble. His Excellency. Most Reverend Dom. Carlos Duarte
    Preamble. His Excellency. Most Reverend Dom. Carlos Duarte Costa was consecrated as the Roman Catholic Diocesan Bishop of Botucatu in Brazil on December !" #$%&" until certain views he expressed about the treatment of the Brazil’s poor, by both the civil (overnment and the Roman Catholic Church in Brazil caused his removal from the Diocese of Botucatu. His Excellency was subsequently named as punishment as *itular bishop of Maurensi by the late Pope Pius +, of the Roman Catholic Church in #$-.. His Excellency, Most Reverend /ord Carlos Duarte Costa had been a strong advocate in the #$-0s for the reform of the Roman Catholic Church" he challenged many of the 1ey issues such as • Divorce" • challenged mandatory celibacy for the clergy, and publicly stated his contempt re(arding. 2*his is not a theological point" but a disciplinary one 3 Even at this moment in time in an interview with 4ermany's Die 6eit magazine the current Bishop of Rome" Pope Francis is considering allowing married priests as was in the old time including lets not forget married bishops and we could quote many Bishops" Cardinals and Popes over the centurys prior to 8atican ,, who was married. • abuses of papal power, including the concept of Papal ,nfallibility, which the bishop considered a mis(uided and false dogma. His Excellency President 4et9lio Dornelles 8argas as1ed the Holy :ee of Rome for the removal of His Excellency Most Reverend Dom. Carlos Duarte Costa from the Diocese of Botucatu. *he 8atican could not do this directly. 1 | P a g e *herefore the Apostolic Nuncio to Brazil entered into an agreement with the :ecretary of the Diocese of Botucatu to obtain the resi(nation of His Excellency, Most Reverend /ord.
    [Show full text]
  • Exarch Josif I (1840-1915) (Real Name Lazar Yovchev) Is a Distinguished Bulgarian Orthodox Cleric
    Exarch Josif I (1840-1915) (real name Lazar Yovchev) is a distinguished Bulgarian Orthodox cleric. He was Bishop of Vidin, Metropolitan of the Lovech Diocese and Bulgarian Exarch – Head of the Bulgarian Orthodox Church. Lazar Yovchev was born on the 5 of May 1840 in the enlightened town of Kalopher at the foot of the Balkan mountain. Studious and curious student during the primary school, he later became a teaching assistant of Botio Petkov, well known teacher in Kalopher and abroad. Supported by affuent Kalopher citizens living in Tzarigrad (Istanbul) he continued his studies in the Grand People’s School in Fener (in Turkish - Fener Rum Erkek Lisesi) and later in the French College (Tzarigrad). With the fnancial help of the Kalopher community he enrolled in 1864 in the prestigious Literary Faculty of the Sorbonne University (Paris). After three years study there he transferred to the Law School of the same university, which he graduated with a Bachelor degree and license to practice law. After six years in France, Lazar Yovchev returns to Tzarigrad and works at the Central Court of Commerce. In the same time he is active in political journalism and translation. He became a Board Member of the Macedonian Bulgarian Union (Makedonska Bylgarska Drujina). He was also invited to become a Secretary of the Joined Exarchate Council (Smesen Exarchiiski Syvet). Thanks to respect and popularity and without a formal ecclesiastical education, in 1872 the newly ordained monk becomes Coadjutor of the Exarch (equal to a Bishop reverence) under the monk name Yossif. In the next 3-4 years Bishop Yossif actively participates in the organization of the newly independent Bulgarian Church, travels the Bulgarian lands, meets representatives of the Great Powers, owing to his excellence in French, but mostly because of his ability to negotiate and persuade.
    [Show full text]
  • Archdiocese of Indianapolis Deanery and Parish Maps Deaneries 1
    Archdiocese of Indianapolis The Church in Central and Southern Indiana Archdiocese of Indianapolis Deanery and Parish Maps Deaneries 1. Indianapolis North Deanery Dean: Very Rev. Guy Roberts, VF 4217 Central Ave., Indianapolis, IN 46205........................................ 317-283-5508 009 Immaculate Heart of Mary, 030 St. Luke the Evangelist, Indianapolis Indianapolis 012 Christ the King, Indianapolis 033 St. Matthew the Apostle, 014 St. Andrew the Apostle, Indianapolis Indianapolis 038 St. Pius X, Indianapolis 025 St. Joan of Arc, Indianapolis 041 St. Simon the Apostle, Indianapolis 029 St. Lawrence, Indianapolis 043 St. Thomas Aquinas, Indianapolis 2. Indianapolis East Deanery Dean: Rev. Msgr. Paul D. Koetter, VF 7243 E. 10th St., Indianapolis, IN 46219 ..........................................317-353-9404 001 SS. Peter and Paul Cathedral, 032 St. Mary, Indianapolis Indianapolis 037 St. Philip Neri, Indianapolis 004 Holy Cross, Church of the, 039 St. Rita, Indianapolis Indianapolis 042 St. Therese of the Infant Jesus 007 Holy Spirit, Indianapolis (Little Flower), Indianapolis 011 Our Lady of Lourdes, 072 St. Thomas the Apostle, Indianapolis Fortville 018 St. Bernadette, Indianapolis 079 St. Michael, Greenfield 3. Indianapolis South Deanery Dean: Very Rev. James R. Wilmoth, VF 3600 S. Pennsylvania St., Indianapolis, IN 46227 ............................ 317-784-1763 005 Holy Name of Jesus, Church 022 SS. Francis and Clare of Assisi, of the Most, Beech Grove Greenwood 006 Holy Rosary, Our Lady of the 026 St. John the Evangelist, Most, Indianapolis Indianapolis 010 Nativity of Our Lord Jesus 028 St. Jude, Indianapolis Christ, Indianapolis 031 St. Mark the Evangelist, 013 Sacred Heart of Jesus, Indianapolis Indianapolis 036 St. Patrick, Indianapolis 015 St. Ann, Indianapolis 040 St.
    [Show full text]
  • Xerox University Microfilms
    INFORMATION TO USERS This material was produced from a microfilm copy o f the original document. While the most advai peed technological meant to photograph and reproduce this document have been useJ the quality is heavily dependent upon the quality of the original submitted. The followini explanation o f techniques is provided to help you understand markings or pattei“ims which may appear on this reproduction. 1. The sign or “ target" for pages apparently lacking from die document phoiographed is “Missing Page(s)". If it was possible to obtain the missing page(s) or section, they are spliced into the film along with adjacent pages. This| may have necessitated cutting thru an image and duplicating adjacent pages to insure you complete continuity. 2. Wheji an image on the film is obliterated with a large round black mark, it is ar indication that the photographer suspected that the copy may have mo1vad during exposure and thus cause a blurred image. You will find a good image of the page in the adjacent frame. 3. Wheh a map, drawing or chart, etc., was part of the material being photographed the photographer followed a definite method in 'sectioning" the material. It is customary to begin photoing at the upper left hand corner of a large sheet and to continue photoing from left to righj in equal sections with a small overlap. If necessary, sectioning is continued again - beginning below the first row and continuing on until com alete. 4. The majority of users indicate that the textual content is of greatest value, ho we ver, a somewhat higher quality reproduction could be made from "ph btographs" if essential to the understanding of the dissertation.
    [Show full text]
  • Great Cloud of Witnesses.Indd
    A Great Cloud of Witnesses i ii A Great Cloud of Witnesses A Calendar of Commemorations iii Copyright © 2016 by The Domestic and Foreign Missionary Society of The Protestant Episcopal Church in the United States of America Portions of this book may be reproduced by a congregation for its own use. Commercial or large-scale reproduction for sale of any portion of this book or of the book as a whole, without the written permission of Church Publishing Incorporated, is prohibited. Cover design and typesetting by Linda Brooks ISBN-13: 978-0-89869-962-3 (binder) ISBN-13: 978-0-89869-966-1 (pbk.) ISBN-13: 978-0-89869-963-0 (ebook) Church Publishing, Incorporated. 19 East 34th Street New York, New York 10016 www.churchpublishing.org iv Contents Introduction vii On Commemorations and the Book of Common Prayer viii On the Making of Saints x How to Use These Materials xiii Commemorations Calendar of Commemorations Commemorations Appendix a1 Commons of Saints and Propers for Various Occasions a5 Commons of Saints a7 Various Occasions from the Book of Common Prayer a37 New Propers for Various Occasions a63 Guidelines for Continuing Alteration of the Calendar a71 Criteria for Additions to A Great Cloud of Witnesses a73 Procedures for Local Calendars and Memorials a75 Procedures for Churchwide Recognition a76 Procedures to Remove Commemorations a77 v vi Introduction This volume, A Great Cloud of Witnesses, is a further step in the development of liturgical commemorations within the life of The Episcopal Church. These developments fall under three categories. First, this volume presents a wide array of possible commemorations for individuals and congregations to observe.
    [Show full text]
  • Baptist North American Phase Communiqué
    North American Phase 2003 Communiqué The North American phase of the international theological conversations between Anglicans and Baptists was held at Acadia University, Wolfville, Nova Scotia, from 10 - 12 September 2003. This regional meeting follows five previous phases held in Norwich (for Europe) in 2000, Yangon (for Asia/Pacific) in 2001, Nairobi (for Africa), in 2002, Santiago,Chile (for Latin America) and Nassau (for the Caribbean) in January 2003. Participants came from the United States and Canada, representing their respective Churches and joined the members of the "Continuation Committee" which is conducting these regional gatherings on behalf of the Baptist World Alliance and the Anglican Communion. The Anglican and Baptist representatives gave an overview of the life of their respective communions in North America. Seven substantive papers were presented on Common Challenges facing Anglicans and Baptists in North America, Baptist Life in North America, A North American Baptist Understanding of Continuity, two papers on The Nature and Role of the Church from Anglican and Baptist perspectives and paired papers on Authority. The plenary discussion drew together insights from the American and Canadian contexts and related them to the themes emerging from previous regional conversations, namely: continuity and story; the meaning of recognition; mission and ministry; baptism and Christian initiation; membership of the Church; the Eucharist or Lord's Supper; oversight and episcope; and confessing the apostolic faith. Discussion focussed on how each tradition handled diversity of views within their tradition, and the nature of denominational allegiance as well as the diversity between the two communions. The meeting began with a celebration of an Anglican Eucharist in the local parish church, and included shared prayer and devotions conducted by Baptists and Anglicans.
    [Show full text]
  • HOLY DOORS Holy Door Is to Make the Journey Istock That Every Christian Is Called to Make, to Go from Darkness to N My Last Bishop’S Message, We Talked Light
    BISHOP’S MESSAGE On Dec. 8, this Holy Door at Saint Peter’s Basilica in Rome was opened for pilgrims to walk through. (churches of special significance) and each has its own Holy Door. These doors are normally walled up from the inside and could not be opened every day. During jubilee years, the walls are broken down and the doors are opened so pilgrims can walk through and gain the plenary indulgence connected with the jubilee year. The symbolism of the Holy Door becomes apparent when one considers what happens at the door of a church: it is where we pass from this world into the holy presence of God. Here, the priest or deacon welcomes the parents of the baby brought to be baptized into the Church; here, too, he greets the bride and groom at the beginning of their wedding liturgy; and finally, the church door is where the priest meets the casket of the deceased at the beginning of his or her funeral. In the words of our Holy Father Francis, “There is only one way that opens wide the entrance into the life of communion with God: this is Jesus, the one and absolute way to salvation. To Him alone can the words of the Psalmist be applied in full truth: ‘This is the door of the Lord where the just may enter.’” (Psalm 118:20) The church door is, literally and figuratively, the way to Christ. The Holy Door takes this symbolism one step further. To pass through a HOLY DOORS Holy Door is to make the journey iStock that every Christian is called to make, to go from darkness to n my last Bishop’s Message, we talked light.
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings Wesley Historical Society
    Proceedings OF THE Wesley Historical Society Editor: REv. JOHN C. BOWMER, M.A., B.D., Ph.D. Volume xxxvm August 1971 THE "TUCK NET" CONTROVERSY OF 1824 [The writer wishes to acknowledge the help given by the Baptist Union and the Baptists of Penzance in the compilation of this article.] OMPARATIVELY little has been written of the relationship of Methodism to Dissent in the early nineteenth century. CWhilst Dissent shared the renewal of the Evangelical Revival, there was much odium theologicum from the Calvinist-Arminian dispute; the Dissenting historians David Bogue and lames Bennett charged Wesleyan Methodism in 1812 with error, scriptural ignor­ ance, and enthusiasm. The tendency of Wesleyanism to regard itself as midway between Church and Dissent was an irritation; Dissenters much preferred the attitude of the various non- Wesleyan Methodist bodies. The general touchiness of contemporary Protest­ antism further prevented mutual understanding. Local conditions doubtless varied widely, but most of these factors emerged in a dispute between the Wesleyans and the Baptists of Penzance in 1824. This" Tuck Net" controversy-so called from the title of one of the pamphlets written by the Baptist minister, G. C. Smith-was far removed in spirit from the great Free Church alliance with which the century was to end. This rather squalid dispute sheds light upon the ecclesiastical life of the neighbourhood, and shows a Baptist interest in certain Wesleyan Methodist internal problems in the second decade of the nineteenth century. Wesleyan Methodism in Penzance was very strong. The Pen­ zance circuit in 1824 returned 2,110 members, of whom about 430 came from Penzance, and 118 from Newlyn.
    [Show full text]
  • The Communists and the Bulgarian . Orthodox
    . The Communists and the Bulgarian .Orthodox Church, 1944-48: The Rise and Fall of Exarch Stefan SPAS T.RAIKIN For a long time before the communist takeover in Bulgaria on 9 Sep­ tember 1944, the Bulgarian Orthodox Church and the Communist Party had been in a state of open hostility. The Bulgarian communists held firmly to the Marxist view that religion is the opium ofthe people. They carried on agitation at every level to discredit religion and the Church-. Intellectuals were told that to hold any religious beliefs is to regress to superstition. For the peasants and working classes, the priest was reduced to an object of ridicule for his laziness and immorality, illustrated with many degrading stories. This campaign, waged largely by young men who had. received some education in provincial towns, was conducted primarily in village taverns and on street corners where peasant youth congregated in the absence of any other social outlets, and was highly successful. To this challenge the Church could not find an adequate response. The mutually exclusive philosophical positions of Church and communism deprived both Church and Party of any point of contact. They remained total strangers, completely opposed to each other. The Communist Party never tried to infiltrate the Church or to create its own following there. Unlike the Orthodox Church in Yugoslavia, where numerous priests found themselves in the partisan groups of Marshal Tito, the Bulgarian Church was conspicuously absent from the "Fatherland Front" organised by the communists as a front to take over the country in 1944. The Church was part of the political and social order in the country, and was dependent upon this order for its survival.
    [Show full text]
  • The Concept of “Sister Churches” in Catholic-Orthodox Relations Since
    THE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA The Concept of “Sister Churches” In Catholic-Orthodox Relations since Vatican II A DISSERTATION Submitted to the Faculty of the School of Theology and Religious Studies Of The Catholic University of America In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree Doctor of Philosophy © Copyright All Rights Reserved By Will T. Cohen Washington, D.C. 2010 The Concept of “Sister Churches” In Catholic-Orthodox Relations since Vatican II Will T. Cohen, Ph.D. Director: Paul McPartlan, D.Phil. Closely associated with Catholic-Orthodox rapprochement in the latter half of the 20 th century was the emergence of the expression “sister churches” used in various ways across the confessional division. Patriarch Athenagoras first employed it in this context in a letter in 1962 to Cardinal Bea of the Vatican Secretariat for the Promotion of Christian Unity, and soon it had become standard currency in the bilateral dialogue. Yet today the expression is rarely invoked by Catholic or Orthodox officials in their ecclesial communications. As the Polish Catholic theologian Waclaw Hryniewicz was led to say in 2002, “This term…has now fallen into disgrace.” This dissertation traces the rise and fall of the expression “sister churches” in modern Catholic-Orthodox relations and argues for its rehabilitation as a means by which both Catholic West and Orthodox East may avoid certain ecclesiological imbalances toward which each respectively tends in its separation from the other. Catholics who oppose saying that the Catholic Church and the Orthodox Church are sisters, or that the church of Rome is one among several patriarchal sister churches, generally fear that if either of those things were true, the unicity of the Church would be compromised and the Roman primacy rendered ineffective.
    [Show full text]
  • Duke Drama Director Ball Accused of Slander in Suit University Begins
    THE CHRONICLE FRIDAY, JANUARY 12, 1990 © DUKE UNIVERSITY DURHAM, NORTH CAROLINA CIRCULATION: 15,000 VOL. 85, NO. 76 Duke Drama director Ball accused of slander in suit By MATT SCLAFANI peated phone calls. Duke Drama Director David Neither Kumin or his attorney Ball is being sued for slander by were available for comment. a former instructor in the drama Kumin left the University be­ department. cause of "serious professional In a suit filed in Durham and ethical disagreements with County Superior Court on Dec. 4, the philosophy and activities of Ronald Kumin alleges that Ball David Ball," the suit states. lied to several individuals about Kumin's suit alleges that Ball Kumin, damaging his reputation. told a number of individuals that The University is named as a co- Kumin was fired "for un­ defendant in the suit. authorized activities and misap­ Kumin was an instructor in propriation of funds" including the drama department, where he breaking into the desk of a taught business management drama department employee and and promotion of dramatic arts, stealing her artwork. until September. The suit characterizes Ball as Kumin was also director of the "rude, furious and hysterical" in Broadway Preview series, which a conversation with the propri­ promotes plays and musicals at etor of a local typesetting com­ the University before they ap­ pany that was preparing adver­ pear on Broadway. Kumin was tisements for "The Merry Wives responsible for bringing a num­ of Windsor, Texas," a play that ber of notable productions to the appeared at the University in University including December. Kumin was responsi­ "Metamorphosis" with Mikhail ble for organizing the advertising Baryshnikov and, more recently, for the production.
    [Show full text]