A Moragues Faus T Marsden 2017 the Political Ecology of Food Postprint.Pdf

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A Moragues Faus T Marsden 2017 the Political Ecology of Food Postprint.Pdf This is an Open Access document downloaded from ORCA, Cardiff University's institutional repository: http://orca.cf.ac.uk/104340/ This is the author’s version of a work that was submitted to / accepted for publication. Citation for final published version: Moragues Faus, Ana and Marsden, Terry 2017. The political ecology of food: Carving 'spaces of possibility' in a new research agenda. Journal of Rural Studies 55 , pp. 275-288. 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.08.016 file Publishers page: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.08.016 <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.08.016> Please note: Changes made as a result of publishing processes such as copy-editing, formatting and page numbers may not be reflected in this version. For the definitive version of this publication, please refer to the published source. You are advised to consult the publisher’s version if you wish to cite this paper. This version is being made available in accordance with publisher policies. See http://orca.cf.ac.uk/policies.html for usage policies. Copyright and moral rights for publications made available in ORCA are retained by the copyright holders. The political ecology of food: carving spaces of possibility in a new research agenda Moragues-Faus Ana and Marsden Terry Cite as: Moragues-Faus A. and Marsden, T. 2017 The political ecology of food: carving Journal of Rural Studies (In press) spaces of possibility in a new research agenda Abstract: In times of austerity and global environmental change, recent crises related to food (in)securities and (un)sustainabilities urge us to reposition agri-food research. We argue that there is an opportunity to develop a more critical food scholarship by explicitly integrating political ecology approaches. For this purpose, the paper outlines major elements in the extensive political ecology scholarship to guide a critical review of some central trends in food research, as well as considering the contribution to date of food studies to political ecology perspectives. This exercise allows us to identify key avenues of convergence between food studies and political ecology frameworks that constitute three conceptual building blocks of a revised critical food scholarship: understanding place-based socio-natures; addressing the politics of scale and inequality; and co- producing knowledge and change. These coordinates are used to analyse two emergent potential spaces of possibility, embodied in the emergence of cities as food policy actors and the rise of the Food Sovereignty movement. We conclude by exploring how a critical food scholarship could inform an inclusive reframing to produce the grounds of possibility for a more socially and ecologically diverse food system. Keywords: political ecology, food studies, food security, sustainability, socio-natures, food movements 1. Introduction: repositioning food crisis in unruly capitalism 1 The agri-food scholarship has evolved over the past twenty years from a predominant focus on production to include not only consumption dynamics, but a much more complex landscape of actors, processes and theories (Goodman, 1999; Marsden et al., 1996; Winter, 2003b). Nevertheless, by and large, during a prolonged period of plenty- when food supplies and provision seemed to be largely solved for the developed countries at least (from the 1980s through to the food crisis of 2007-2008)- much research on food has been disconnected from its political and/or ecological implications. We wish to argue in this paper that it is now time to acknowledge how the period since 2007 represents a new rupture and a more volatile context for agri-food scholarship, whereby the explosion of interest in food studies which preceded it requires a critical re-examination and the development of new insights. The combined food, financial and fiscal global crisis unleashed in 2007 represents a significant rupture with the pasti. In most countries, the gap between rich and poor is at its highest level in the last 30 years (OECD, 2015). Since the crisis, the rise of global levels of inequality has accelerated, fuelled by increasing unemployment and the politics of austerity which have weakened the cushioning effect of redistributive policies (ibid). In European countries, the associated dismantling of the welfare state has created increases in food and energy poverty, partly coming into the light in the form of food bank queues. It is important to recognise that this new terrain contains policy and scientific reactions which hold implications for the agri-food research agenda. First, the crisis has led to a broad renaissance of (neo) productivist responses to the wider problems of global food and nutritional security (see for example Royal Society, 2009; HOC, 2014; Silvasti, 2015), that is, an integration of food security concerns into a wider neoliberal agenda that frames hunger as a technical problem that must be addressed 2 through increased productivity and the liberalisation of trade (Moragues-Faus, 2017a). This energising bio-scientists and economists to prospectivelyapproach assess to feed the the globalisation world is of the food security problems in an aggregated sense. At the same time, and driven by a more domestic social and food welfare concern, we see a proliferation of civil society initiatives (such as city food movements and local community initiatives) which are attempting to build more radical and place-based (see Marsden and Morley, 2014; Blay-Palmer etalternatives al., 2013). toAs the some dominant have noted food (Goodman regime et al., 2013), research on these food alternatives has been instrumental in generating a rich set of case studies, often celebratory, which would benefit from linking to broader conceptual frameworks in order to enlighten theoretical but also practical transitions towards sustainability in this new period. In reality, separations between these alternative and conventional food networks have proven sterile since they are indeed relational to one another and conforming a hybrid food system (Sonnino and Marsden, 2006). Invariably, this new food landscape, unleashed since 2007, holds important implications for the current and future pathways of the agri-food scholarship, in that it specifically re-questions the central role of the politics of place and nature in resolving the current food crisis. Critical perspectives now have important contributions to make in these new conditions and at this particular juncture. Food studies would now benefit from a re- problematization of place and nature and a more politically sensitive approach to the asymmetrical character of nature-social relationships. Building on recent work on food, we call for a more critical and grounded relational approach where food acts as a vehicle and central heuristic device for understanding crises and their uneven dynamics 3 at different spatial scales. This paper aims to contribute to the development of a more engaged, ecologically attuned and critical food scholarship. Central to this aim, we argue, is to re-introduce a re-freshed political ecology dimension into this scholarship that recognizes the subjectivity of current understandings of environmental challenges and their potential responses . Taking OBrien,-based explorationsRobbins to explain definition linkages of inpolitical the conditionecology PE and as change empirical, of social/environmental research systems, with explicit consideration of 391), we aim to re-appraise some of the key trends in the currentrelations food of power studies : literature. PE not only stresses the political dimension of socio- ecological systems, but also how our knowledge, and related knowledge production processes, shape and are shaped by political and economic processes (Forsyth, 2003; Robbins, 2012). Consequently, PE serves as a useful lens to expose the socio-natural processes that (re)produce inequalities, exclusion and injustice between people and places(Brenner, 2009; Hubbard et al., 2002) which underpin the current geography of food insecurity. Such a revised perspec tive is further motivated by the recent and interdependent (un)sustainaibilities,nexus crises e.g. financial, which fiscalurge usand to energy rethink closelyresearch related agendas to food committed insecurities to an and emancipatory politics, promoting social change and the development of new spaces of hope and possibility (Blomley, 2006; Harvey, 2000). As Neil Smith(2015) capital implosion and global uprisings that accompanied it opened up a possibilitystated, s of a future. This future builds upon economic alternatives thatand diverseshould experimentalno longer be ecosystemsregarded as ofresidual norms, practices, practices ….and Theytrajectories are valuable the seed banks, if you will, of – 4 (Sheppard, 2015:1129). Building these ecosystemsalternatives requiresto globalizing a critical capitalism food scholarship which attempts to (Tornaghi, 2014:14). Inspired also by Gibson-politicize, empower (2006)and identify reflections alternatives on the role of academics in a more heterodox capitalism,Grahams a re- po practices of thinking economy and liticization of food would then require new ethical becoming different kinds of economic beings p. xxviii. To address and contribute to these perspectives, in section two we outline key elements in the extensive political ecology scholarship and related contributions to the political ecology of food. Section three presents a succinct critical review of some central trends in food research. Inevitably, and given the rapid expansion of
Recommended publications
  • CREATIVITY, ECOLOGY and EDUCATION Ay
    1st level Master of Gastronomy: CREATIVITY, ECOLOGY AND EDUCATION a.y. 2020_21 Student Guide 1 CONTENTS GENERAL INFORMATION ..................................................................................................................................................... 3 Program Overview ............................................................................................................................................................. 3 Calendar ................................................................................................................................................................................ 3 Program Structure .............................................................................................................................................................. 3 Syllabi ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 7 Workshops/Partecipatory Learning ........................................................................................................................... 30 University Fee Payment Regulations .......................................................................................................................... 37 TEACHING MATERIAL .......................................................................................................................................................... 38 BlackBoard .......................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • On the Sociology of Eating
    A. Warde - Review of Agricultural and Environmental Studies, 96-1 (2015), 7-15 On the sociology of eating Alan WARDE University of Manchester, School of Social Sciences, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK E-mail: [email protected] Abstract – This paper is a personal reflection upon the development of the sociology of eating over the previous thirty years. It considers eating as a form of cultural consumption and discusses alternative approaches to its analysis. It focuses on sociological explanations of continuity and change, and the role of institutions, routines and practices. It suggests that eating is a compound practice which is weakly regulated and weakly coordinated. The paper concludes with some suggestions about lines of future research in the field and discusses the promise of a new study of eating out. Keywords: consumption, eating, food, practices, sociology JEL Classification : Q1, Q19 After thirty years It is an unexpected honour to be invited to offer these selective reflections on three decades of scholarly work on eating from the point of view of a confessed sociologist. The last thirty years have seen significant advances in social scien- tific research on food. The sociology of food and eating textbooks of the 1990s (Mennell et al., 1992, for example) were supported by limited social research, presenting very incomplete, if generally accurate, coverage of the processes and distributions which a sociologist might want to know about. The picture has filled out since, as witnessed by compendious volumes like Poulain (2012) and Murcott et al. (2013) which record the results of a vast amount of research conducted more recently.
    [Show full text]
  • Feminist Food Studies: a Brief History
    Feminist Food Studies: A Brief History ARLENE VOSKI AVAKIAN BARBARA HABER The study of food, cooking, and eating, once a subject limited to nutri- tionists and a few anthropologists studying the symbolic importance of foodways among “natives,”1 has expanded to include sociology, history, philosophy, economics, and the interdisciplinary fields of Women’s Studies, American Studies and Cultural Studies.2 Articles on food have recently appeared in a diverse list of scholarly periodicals and antholo- gies, while new books on the topic continue to be published in ever greater numbers by both university and trade presses. In the last decade an avalanche of books on food has appeared, and conferences on food are no longer the sole concern of food professionals. In addition to the annual conference of the Association for the Study of Food and Society (ASFS) other organizations have sponsored conferences addressing food such as The New School for Social Research’s 1998 conference “Food: Nature and Culture,” and its published proceedings,3 and the 77th Annual Asians in America Conference 2001, “Palates of Pleasure: The Philosophy and Politics of Southeast Asian Food,” complete with Southeast Asian meals catered by restaurants or prepared by guest chefs. ASFS also publishes a journal and has a listserve with lively dis- cussions and debates on everything from the origins of barbecue to sources for research on a variety of topics.4 In addition to the journal Food and Foodways, published since 1985, Gastronomica, a journal de- voted to food and culture, published its first issue in 2000. Common among these works is the notion that studying the most banal of human activities can yield crucial information and insights about both daily life and world view, from what is in the pot to the significance of the fire that heats it.
    [Show full text]
  • Karl Bruckmeier1 ”Eating the Planet”
    Karl Bruckmeier1 ”Eating the planet” - seeking a philosophy of food in the anthropocene2 DoI: 10.18030/socio.hu.2015en.4 Abstract This paper discusses possibilities of renewing the philosophical discourse on food as part of interdisciplinary approaches to understand the global changes of food systems and the transcultural consequences of these changes. Social and environmental changes in the epoch of the Anthropocene, of globalization, industrial food production, and genetic modification of food products, require interdisciplinary analyses. The philosophy of food did not become influential in the history of philosophy and not in present social and ecological food discourses, except in fragmentary themes as the ethics of food production and consumption. The traditions of interdisciplinary and synthetic thinking in philosophy give reasons to renew the philosophy of food to analyse and reflect the wider social, cultural and ecological problems of food production and consumption. Such critical analyses require, beyond empirical research and its assessment, knowledge syntheses, theoretical reflection and normative judgements. The themes include the paradoxes of modern food and agriculture systems: hunger and abundance of food, unequal distribution of resources and access to food in market systems, commodification and de-commodification of food and natural resources, the limited availability of natural resources for human consumption and the continuing economic “growth mania”. The metaphor “eating the planet” describes risks for food production and consumption under conditions of global social and environmental change. Why such a cognitive programme should develop under the name of philosophy is discussed with arguments referring to knowledge synthesis, critical analysis and the practical significance of the philosophy of food for searching solutions to food and resource problems.
    [Show full text]
  • Food Security and Identity: Iceland
    FOOD SECURITY AND IDENTITY: ICELAND A thesis submitted to Kent State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts by Gina Marie Butrico August, 2013 Thesis written by Gina Butrico A.A.S., Middlesex County College, 2009 B.A., Kent State University, 2011 M.A., Kent State University, 2013 Approved by ___________________________________, Advisor Dr. David H. Kaplan, Ph.D. ___________________________________, Chair, Department of Geography Dr. Mandy Munro-Stasiuk, Ph.D. ___________________________________, Associate Dean for Graduate Affairs, Raymond A. Craig, Ph.D. College of Arts and Sciences ii TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Figures ..........................................................................................................v List of Tables ....................................................................................................... viii Acknowledgements ................................................................................................ ix Chapter I. Introduction .................................................................................................1 Food Security in Iceland ..............................................................................3 Food Identity in Iceland ...............................................................................5 Site Selection ...............................................................................................6 Food Geography...........................................................................................7
    [Show full text]
  • Shape of ACT Senior Secondary Curriculum: Food Studies
    Shape of ACT Senior Secondary Curriculum: Food Studies August 2020 Table of Contents 1. PURPOSE ....................................................................................................................................... 1 2. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................. 1 3. BACKGROUND ............................................................................................................................... 1 4. THE CONTEXT OF THE ACT ............................................................................................................ 3 5. AIMS OF THE FOOD STUDIES CURRICULUM ................................................................................. 4 6. STRUCTURE OF THE FOOD STUDIES CURRICULUM ...................................................................... 5 7. CONSIDERATIONS ......................................................................................................................... 7 8. PEDAGOGY AND ASSESSMENT ..................................................................................................... 9 9. CONCLUSION .............................................................................................................................. 10 10. REFERENCES ................................................................................................................................ 10 1. PURPOSE 1.1 The Shape of ACT Senior Secondary Curriculum: Food Studies will guide the writing
    [Show full text]
  • FOOD LAW and POLICY CAREER GUIDE October 2017 Researched and Prepared By
    FOOD LAW AND POLICY CAREER GUIDE October 2017 Researched and Prepared by: Harvard Law School Food Law and Policy Clinic Emily Broad Leib, Director Christina Rice, Clinical Fellow Teresa Pulaski, Intern [email protected] http://www.chlpi.org/flpc The Food Law and Policy Clinic of Harvard Law School (FLPC), a division of the Center for Health Law and Policy Innovation, was established in 2010 to link Harvard Law School students with opportunities to work with clients and communities on various food law and policy issues. The FLPC provides legal and policy guidance to a range of clients seeking to increase access to healthy foods, assist small and sustainable farmers in breaking into new commercial markets, and reduce waste of healthy, wholesome food, while educating law students about ways to use law and policy to impact the food system. The FLPC engages a strong policy orientation as well as substantive expertise in the food system to assist a range of federal, state, and local clients around the world in understanding the legal and policy regimes that apply to food production and sales. Harvard Food Law Society Alex Leone, Tommy Tobin, Lisa Gluckstein, & Steven Gonzalez www.law.harvard.edu/orgs/foodlaw/ The Harvard Food Law Society fosters on-campus dialogue on issues in food law and policy. Food- related issues often implicate broader questions of public health, environmental sustainability, income inequality, economic development, and human rights. The Food Law Society supports a network of students, professionals, and food-lovers who support a healthier, more equitable food system. Members participate in clinical research projects and conferences, host speakers, take trips and collaborate with groups throughout the University and the world in their effort to address food issues.
    [Show full text]
  • Food Matters: Interdisciplinary Perspectives in Food Studies ENVS 607 T/W 12-1:50Pm Fall 2016
    Dr. Sarah D. Wald 443 PLC [email protected] Office Hours: T, 2-5pm Food Matters: Interdisciplinary Perspectives in Food Studies ENVS 607 T/W 12-1:50pm Fall 2016 This course explores the wide ranging and inherently interdisciplinary field of food studies. As academic interest in the realm of food studies has developed, it has become clear that there are key approaches and insights in disciplines across the social sciences, the humanities, and the sciences. Each broad academic realm has its focal concerns and approaches. By design this course provides a survey of food studies scholarship across this intellectual continuum, examining key issues and themes as well as methodologies in each realm. Upon completion, you will have a working knowledge of and a foundational fluency with food studies scholarship writ large and will be able to see how your own interests fit within the larger field. The course establishes a foundation for the new graduate specialization in Food Studies. The course is also designed to help you develop critical reading, writing, and oral presentation skills. Course Structure: This class will function in a seminar style and will involve extended discussion and analysis of the assigned readings. In order to flourish and to get the most out of the class, you will need to keep up on your assigned readings, think critically about what you read, take good reading notes, use your notes to make meaningful contributions to in-class discussions, and produce thoughtful, robust work for your required essays and project. For more information on the Food Studies Program at University of Oregon, see: http://foodstudies.uoregon.edu/ Information about applying for the specialization program is available on this page.
    [Show full text]
  • Proquest Dissertations
    INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note vrill indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy. Higher quality 6" x 9" black and white photographic prints are available for any photographs or illustrations appearing in this copy for an additional charge. Contact UMI directly to order. Bell & Howell Information and Learning 300 North Zeeb Road, Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 USA 800-521-0600 UMI' GLOBALIZATION AND FOOD SECURITY IN LESS INDUSTRIALIZED SOCIETIES: AT-RISK POPULATIONS AND THE SOCIOLOGY OF HUNGER DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Stephen J. Scanlan, M.A. ***** The Ohio State University 2000 Dissertation Committee Approved by: Professor J.
    [Show full text]
  • Anthropology of Food Class Location: Online, Webex (Tues 11:30Am-12:45Pm) Fall 2020--16 Weeks
    1 ANTH 4389 Anthropology of Food Class Location: Online, Webex (Tues 11:30am-12:45pm) Fall 2020--16 weeks Maya Mural at Calakmul, Campeche, Mexico, depicting chocolate consumption. Photo from http://www.latinamericanstudies.org/calakmul-2.htm INSTRUCTOR AND CONTACT INFORMATION Instructor: Christine Jones, PhD Office: HH 204C • Contact me via Canvas message or email: [email protected] • Office hours: By webex or phone appointment. Email me to set up a virtual meeting! Student-instructor interaction During the week (Mon-Fri) I usually check emails often and respond within 24 hours. I may not respond to weekend emails until Monday or Tuesday. Email is a better way to reach me than Canvas message. If you have questions or concerns about the class and need to talk about them, please email me to request a webex or phone appointment. Mode of instruction and course access This is an online blended course which meets 90 to 95% online, and the rest of the course takes place over synchronous webex meetings. Students will attend a total of TWO webex class meetings online (spread out over the semester) held only on Tuesdays 11:30am -12:45 pm. The rest of the class will be held fully online (asynchronous). This course uses the A&M-Central Texas Canvas Learning Management System [https://tamuct.instructure.com/]. Since this is an online class, most communication between the instructor and students will be electronic in nature. Textbook & Assignments on pg. 4, Schedule on pg. 6, Late work policy on pgs. 8 and 9 2 COURSE DESCRIPTION Everyone needs to eat! The practice of cooking, our food choices, and food rituals, are all a major part of what it means to be human.
    [Show full text]
  • Between Feasts and Daily Meals. Towards an Archaeology Of
    Between Feasts and Daily Meals Susan Pollock (ed.) BERLIN STUDIES OF THE ANCIENT WORLD – together in a common physical and social setting – is a central element in people’s everyday lives. This makes com- mensality a particularly important theme within which to explore social relations, social reproduction and the working of politics whether in the present or the past. Archaeological attention has been focused primarily on feasting and other special commensal occasions to the neglect of daily commensality. This volume seeks to redress this imbalance by emphasizing the dynamic relation between feasts and quotidian meals and devoting explicit attention to the micro- politics of Alltag (“the everyday”) rather than solely to special occasions. Case studies drawing on archaeological ( material) as well as written sources range from the Neolithic to the Bronze Age in Western Asia and Greece, Formative to late pre-Columbian com munities in Andean South America, and modern Europe. berlin studies of 30 the ancient world berlin studies of the ancient world · 30 edited by topoi excellence cluster Between Feasts and Daily Meals towards an archaeology of commensal spaces edited by Susan Pollock Bibliographic information published by the Deutsche Nationalbibliothek The Deutsche Nationalbibliothek lists this publication in the Deutsche Nationalbibliographie; detailed bibliographic data are available in the Internet at http://dnb.d-nb.de. © 2015 Edition Topoi / Exzellenzcluster Topoi der Freien Universität Berlin und der Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin Cover image: Wall plaque with feasting scene, found in Nippur. Baghdad, Iraq Museum. Winfried Orthmann, Propyläen Kunstgeschichte Vol. 14: Der alte Orient. Berlin: Propyläen, 1975, Pl. 79b. Typographic concept and cover design: Stephan Fiedler Printed and distributed by PRO BUSINESS digital printing Deutschland GmbH, Berlin ISBN 978-3-9816751-0-8 URN urn:nbn:de:kobv:188-fudocsdocument0000000222142-2 First published 2015 Published under Creative Commons Licence CC BY-NC 3.0 DE.
    [Show full text]
  • Addressing Urban Food Security Risks Through Urban Agriculture
    sustainability Article Food for Thought: Addressing Urban Food Security Risks through Urban Agriculture Jorinda Steenkamp 1 , Elizelle Juanee Cilliers 1,2,*, Sarel Stephanus Cilliers 1 and Louis Lategan 1 1 Unit for Environmental Sciences and Management, North-West University, Potchefstroom 2531, South Africa; [email protected] (J.S.); [email protected] (S.S.C.); [email protected] (L.L.) 2 Faculty of Design, Architecture and Building, University of Technology Sydney, P.O. Box 123, Broadway, NSW 2007, Australia * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Food and nutrition security has been neglected in the planning field for reasons of a lack of connection between food and planning and the perception that agricultural activities have no place in the modernizing world. However, considering increasing climate change impacts and implications on industrialized agriculture, there is a clear need to establish shorter, more sustainable agricultural production practices and food supply chains. Urban agriculture is proposed as a potential method of intervention for planners to support sustainable food production and supply chains. The paper utilized a multiple-case study design to analyze four best practice examples of urban agriculture in the Global South to uncover its potential to address food security associated risks and contribute to sustainable development objectives. The results delivered evidence of the potential to harness the multifunctionality of urban agriculture to not only improve the food security of the most at-risk populations, but to also address other urban risks such as unemployment, community decline and food deserts. The recommendations for this paper relate to establishing a food security department, mapping and encouraging more sustainable food supply chains, creating land uses and zonings Citation: Steenkamp, J.; Cilliers, E.J.; specific to urban agriculture and to utilize its multifunctionality to address other urban risks.
    [Show full text]