DOCSLIB.ORG

Joule to Electron Volt

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Joule to Electron Volt Joule to electron volt Continue The electronic volt in the short Ev is a unit of energy. Joule is a derivative of energy in the International System of SI units or units. The connection between Eve and Joel is proportional. Changing the Ev value will change the equivalent value of Joule in the same proportion. eV Joule Conversion eV and Joule are units of energy in two different systems. Their equivalence can be mathematically expressed as-Where, eV is the electron volt J joule Definition Formula Symbol 1 electron volt is a change in energy that occurs when a charge equal to 1 electron (1.6×10-19C) is moved through a potential difference of 1 volt. 1eV 1.602×10-19 J EV 1 Joule is a done work or energy transmitted to an object when the force of 1 newton acts on it in the direction of its movement at a distance of 1 meter. 1 J and 6.2415×1018 EV JV Joule Conversion eV Joule is very important in solving problems in physics. Below is the eV table for the conversion of Joule- Energy in eV Energy in Joules 1 eV 1.60218×10-19 J 2 eV 3.2044 ×10-19 J 3 eV 4.8065×× 1 0-19 J 4 eV 6.4087×10-19 J 5 eV 8.0109×10-19 J 6 eV 9.6131×10-19 J 7 eV 1.1. 1215×10-18 J 8 eV 1.2817×10-17 J 9 eV 1.442×10-18 J 10 eV 1.6022×10-18 J 50 eV 8.0109×10-18 J 100 eV 1.6022×10-17 J 500 eV 8.0109×10-17 J 1000 eV 1.6022×10-16 J Joule for eV Conversion eV Joule is very important in solving problems associated with electric charge in physics. Below is the Joule table for the conversion of eV- Energy in Joules Energy in eV 1 J 6.242×1018 eV 2 J 1.248×1019 eV 3 J 1.872×× eV000 4 J 2.497×1019 eV 5 J 3.121e×1019 eV 6 J 3.745×1019 eV 10 7 J 4.369×1019 eV 8 J 4.993×1019 eV 9 J 5.617×1019 eV 10 J 6.242× 1019 eV 50 J 3.121×1020 eV 100 J 6.242×1020 eV 500 J 3.121×1021 eV 1000 J 6.242×1021 eV Hope that you understand the connection between ev and joule also ev joule conversion. Physics Related Topics: Stay tuned with BYJU'S for more interesting articles. Also, sign up for BYJU'S, an educational app for loads of interactive, engaging videos related to physics and unlimited academic assistance. The meV, keV, MeV, GeV, TeV and PeV energy unit is redirected here. For other purposes, see MEV, KEV, GEV, TEV and PEV. In physics, an electronvolt (an eV symbol also written by an electron-volt and an electronic volt) is the amount of kinetic energy generated by a single electron, accelerating from rest through an electrical potential difference of one volt in a vacuum. When used as a unit of energy, the numerical value of 1 eV in joules (symbol J) is equivalent to the numerical value of the electron charge in the pendants (symbol C). In accordance with the redefinition of the base units of SI in 2019, this set of 1 eV is equal to the exact value of 1.602176634×10-19 J. Historically, the electronvolt was developed as a standard unit of measurement due to its utility in electrostatic particle accelerator sciences, because particle with The charge q has E qV after passing through a potential V; if q is quoted in integer units of elementary charge and potential in volts, one receives energy in the eV. It is a common unit of energy in physics, widely used in solid state, atomic, nuclear and particle physics. It is commonly used with metric prefixes milli, kilo, mega-, giga-, tera-, peta- or exa- (meV, keV, MeV, GeV, TeV, PeV and EeV respectively). In some older documents, and in the name Bevatron, the BeV symbol is used, which stands for billions (109) of electronvolts; this is equivalent to GeV. Si unit value eV 1.602176634×10-19 J Mass eV/c2 1.782662×10-36 kg Momentum eV/c 5.344286×10-28 kg/s Temperature eV/kB 1.160451812×104 K Time ħ/eV 6.582119×10-16 s Distance ħc/eV 1.97327×10'7 m Definition of Electronvolt - this is the amount of kinetic energy received or lost by one electron, accelerating from rest through an electrical potential difference of one volt in a vacuum. Therefore, it has the value of one volt, 1 J/C, multiplied by the elementary charge of electron e, 1.602176634×10-19 C. Thus, one electronvolt equals 1.602176634×10-19 J. Electronvolt (eV) is a unit of energy, while the volt (V) is a derivative of the SI electrical capacity unit. The SI unit for energy is joule (J). Mass in mass-energy equivalence, electronvolt is also a unit of mass. It is common in particle physics, where units of mass and energy often change to express mass in eV/c2 units, where c is the speed of light in a vacuum (from E and mc2). Usually simply express mass from the point of view of eV as a unit of mass, effectively using a system of natural units with a set of up to 1. The mass equivalent of 1 eV/c2 is 1 eV / c 2 ( 1.602 176 634 × 10 and 19 C ) ⋅ 1 V ( 2,2,2,2 99 792 458 × 10 8 m /s) 2 th 1,782 661 92 × 10 and 36 kg . Display Style 1; text/c-{2} frac (1.602 176 634 'times 10'-19'; text))Kdot 1; (text) (2.99 x 792 x 458 times 10 {8}); (text) {2} 1,782,661 x 92.2 times 10-36; (text) .. For example, an electron and positron, each with a mass of 0.511 MeV/c2, can destroy to give 1,022 MeV energy. The mass of the proton is 0.938 GEV/c2. In general, the masses of all Hadrons have about 1 Gev/c2, that makes GeV (gigaelectronvolt) a convenient unit of mass for particle physics: 1 Gev/s2 and 1,78266192×10-27 kg. Unified atomic mass (u), almost exactly 1 gram, separated by the number of Avogadro, is almost the mass of the hydrogen atom, which is basically the mass of the proton. To convert to electronic volts, use the formula: 1 u and 931.4941 MeV/c2 0.9314941 GeV/c2. Momentum In high-energy physics, electronvolt is often used as a unit of momentum. Potential 1 volt causes the electron to get the amount of energy (i.e. 1 eV). This results in the use of eV (and keV, MeV, GeV or TeV) as units of momentum, for the energy supplied leads to the acceleration of the particle. The size of the LMT-1 pulse units. The size of the L2MT-2 power units. Then dividing units of energy (such as eV) into a fundamental constant that has a speed unit (LT-1) facilitates the necessary conversion of the use of energy units to describe the pulse. In the field of high-energy physics of elementary particles, the main unit of velocity is the speed of light in vacuum c. Dividing energy in eV by the speed of light, you can describe the pulse of an electron in eV/c units. as they say, 1 GEV, then the conversion to MKS can be achieved by: p No. 1 GEv / s ( 1 × 10 9 ) ⋅ (1,602 176 634 × 10 and 19 C ) ⋅ (1 B) (2.99 792 458 × 10 8 m/s) - 5,344 286 × 10 - 19 kg ⋅ m/s(display p.1); (text)/c'frac (1'1'times 10'{9})'cdot (1.602' 176' 634'times 10'-19'; (text) he-kdot (1) (text)) (2.99' 792'458'times 10'{8};; text/text) 5,344 x 286 times 10-19 euros; Textkg-kdota (text) Distance In particle physics is widely used system of natural units, in which the speed of light in vacuum C and reduced constant Planck ħ are unsal and equal to one: c q ħ and 1. In these units, both distances and time are expressed in reverse energy units (while energy and mass are expressed in the same units, see the equivalence of the mass of energy). In particular, particle scattering lengths are often represented in units of reverse particle masses. Outside this unit system, conversion rates between electronvolt, second and nanometer: ħ - h 2 π - 1,054 571 817 646 × 10 - 34 J s 6,582 119 569 509 × 10 - 16 eV s. Displaystyle hbar h (more than 2'pi) 1.054 571 817 646 times 10-34 MboxJ s'6.582' 119'569'509'times 10'-16' (mbox eV's) . The aforementioned relationship also allows you to express the average lifespan of an unstable particle (in seconds) in terms of its Γ 'Γ' (eV) width through Γ ħ/z. For example, the B0 meson has a lifespan of 1,530 (9) picoseconds, with an average decay length of 459.7 microns, or a decay width (4,302±25)×10-4 eV. Conversely, the tiny differences in meson mass responsible for meson oscillations are often expressed in more convenient reverse picoseconds. Energy in electronvolts is sometimes expressed through the wavelength of light with photon of the same energy: 1 eV h c q (1.602 176 634 × 10 - 19 J ) (2.99 792 458 × 10 10 cm / ) ⋅ (6.62 607 015 × 10 and 34 J ⋅ s) ≈ 8065.5439 cm.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Appendix A: Symbols and Prefixes
    Appendix A: Symbols and Prefixes (Appendix A last revised November 2020) This appendix of the Author's Kit provides recommendations on prefixes, unit symbols and abbreviations, and factors for conversion into units of the International System. Prefixes Recommended prefixes indicating decimal multiples or submultiples of units and their symbols are as follows: Multiple Prefix Abbreviation 1024 yotta Y 1021 zetta Z 1018 exa E 1015 peta P 1012 tera T 109 giga G 106 mega M 103 kilo k 102 hecto h 10 deka da 10-1 deci d 10-2 centi c 10-3 milli m 10-6 micro μ 10-9 nano n 10-12 pico p 10-15 femto f 10-18 atto a 10-21 zepto z 10-24 yocto y Avoid using compound prefixes, such as micromicro for pico and kilomega for giga. The abbreviation of a prefix is considered to be combined with the abbreviation/symbol to which it is directly attached, forming with it a new unit symbol, which can be raised to a positive or negative power and which can be combined with other unit abbreviations/symbols to form abbreviations/symbols for compound units. For example: 1 cm3 = (10-2 m)3 = 10-6 m3 1 μs-1 = (10-6 s)-1 = 106 s-1 1 mm2/s = (10-3 m)2/s = 10-6 m2/s Abbreviations and Symbols Whenever possible, avoid using abbreviations and symbols in paragraph text; however, when it is deemed necessary to use such, define all but the most common at first use. The following is a recommended list of abbreviations/symbols for some important units.
    [Show full text]
  • The Messenger
    THE MESSENGER No. 35-March 1984 Report on the First ESO-CERN Symposium on "Large Scale Structure of the Universe, Cosmology and Fundamental Physics" G. Setti, ESO The first ESO-CERN Symposium was held at CERN, deuterium, were produced when the age of the Universe was Geneva, from 21 st to 25th November 1983 and was attended only about 100 seconds, the temperature about one billion by approximately 200 participants. The discussions concen­ degrees and the density of the order of the density of water, in trated on the general field of Cosmology, where the progress a phase that lasted about 8 minutes. At that moment the made in the past twenty years, both in elementary particles Universe was essentially a gaseous mixture composed of and astronomy, has shown that these two fields of basic protons, neutrons, electrons, positrons, neutrinos and anti­ research are merging toward a new and fundamental under­ neutrinos (and perhaps some other exotic particles, such as standing of the laws that govern our Universe. A detailed photinos) immersed in a heat bath of photons. The equilibrium account is contained in the Proceedings of the Symposium between these components is maintained by the weak which will be available in a few months. interaction, one of the four fundamental forces wh ich are The meeting was started with an introductory lecture by believed to govern all natural phenomena.* The weak force D. W. Sciama (Oxford and Trieste) who highlighted the numer­ together with the "hot big-bang" model allows definite predic­ ous and fundamental problems the understanding of which tions about the abundances of primordial elements.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide for the Use of the International System of Units (SI)
    Guide for the Use of the International System of Units (SI) m kg s cd SI mol K A NIST Special Publication 811 2008 Edition Ambler Thompson and Barry N. Taylor NIST Special Publication 811 2008 Edition Guide for the Use of the International System of Units (SI) Ambler Thompson Technology Services and Barry N. Taylor Physics Laboratory National Institute of Standards and Technology Gaithersburg, MD 20899 (Supersedes NIST Special Publication 811, 1995 Edition, April 1995) March 2008 U.S. Department of Commerce Carlos M. Gutierrez, Secretary National Institute of Standards and Technology James M. Turner, Acting Director National Institute of Standards and Technology Special Publication 811, 2008 Edition (Supersedes NIST Special Publication 811, April 1995 Edition) Natl. Inst. Stand. Technol. Spec. Publ. 811, 2008 Ed., 85 pages (March 2008; 2nd printing November 2008) CODEN: NSPUE3 Note on 2nd printing: This 2nd printing dated November 2008 of NIST SP811 corrects a number of minor typographical errors present in the 1st printing dated March 2008. Guide for the Use of the International System of Units (SI) Preface The International System of Units, universally abbreviated SI (from the French Le Système International d’Unités), is the modern metric system of measurement. Long the dominant measurement system used in science, the SI is becoming the dominant measurement system used in international commerce. The Omnibus Trade and Competitiveness Act of August 1988 [Public Law (PL) 100-418] changed the name of the National Bureau of Standards (NBS) to the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) and gave to NIST the added task of helping U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Extending Symmetries of the Standard Model Towards Grand Unification
    Master research Extending Symmetries of the Standard Model towards Grand Unification Anno Touwen Supervisor prof. dr. Dani¨el Boer August 3, 2018 Abstract In this master thesis the spacetime, global and gauge symmetries of the Standard Model are reviewed. These symmetries are used as a basis for finding possible extensions of this successful model, such as the two Higgs doublet model and Left-Right model. Methods of finding subgroups and the slitting up of representations are discussed based on Dynkin diagrams. These methods are applied to analyse the subgroups of the exceptional group E6 as candidates for Grand Unified 3 Theory groups. In this study SU(5), SO(10) and SU(3) and SU(4)×SU(2)×SU(2) are most important. A phenomenological comparison between these models is given focussed on the different types of leptoquarks that could be responsible for the not yet observed proton decay. Contents 1 Introduction 3 2 Symmetry groups and Gauge theories 5 2.1 Group theory . .5 2.2 Unitary and Special Unitary groups . .8 2.3 Orthogonal and Special Orthogonal groups . 10 2.4 Gauge theories and fields . 11 2.5 Spacetime symmetries . 13 2.6 C, P and T transformations . 14 3 The Standard Model 16 3.1 The Electroweak interaction . 16 3.2 The Strong interaction . 19 3.3 Fermion content . 19 3.4 Eigenstates and the CKM-matrix . 22 3.5 Global symmetries . 23 4 Beyond the Standard Model 28 4.1 Two Higgs doublet model . 28 4.2 Left-Right models . 34 5 A further study of Lie Groups and Algebras 37 5.1 Root systems .
    [Show full text]
  • The International System of Units (SI)
    NAT'L INST. OF STAND & TECH NIST National Institute of Standards and Technology Technology Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce NIST Special Publication 330 2001 Edition The International System of Units (SI) 4. Barry N. Taylor, Editor r A o o L57 330 2oOI rhe National Institute of Standards and Technology was established in 1988 by Congress to "assist industry in the development of technology . needed to improve product quality, to modernize manufacturing processes, to ensure product reliability . and to facilitate rapid commercialization ... of products based on new scientific discoveries." NIST, originally founded as the National Bureau of Standards in 1901, works to strengthen U.S. industry's competitiveness; advance science and engineering; and improve public health, safety, and the environment. One of the agency's basic functions is to develop, maintain, and retain custody of the national standards of measurement, and provide the means and methods for comparing standards used in science, engineering, manufacturing, commerce, industry, and education with the standards adopted or recognized by the Federal Government. As an agency of the U.S. Commerce Department's Technology Administration, NIST conducts basic and applied research in the physical sciences and engineering, and develops measurement techniques, test methods, standards, and related services. The Institute does generic and precompetitive work on new and advanced technologies. NIST's research facilities are located at Gaithersburg, MD 20899, and at Boulder, CO 80303.
    [Show full text]
  • Anomaly and Cobordism Constraints Beyond the Standard Model
    Anomaly and Cobordism Constraints Beyond the Standard Model: Topological Force Juven Wang Center of Mathematical Sciences and Applications, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA Abstract Standard lore uses perturbative local anomalies to check the kinematic consistency of gauge theories coupled to chiral fermions, such as the Standard Models (SM) of particle physics. In this work, based on a systematic cobordism classification, we examine the constraints from invertible quantum anomalies (including all perturbative local anomalies and all nonperturbative global anomalies) for SM and chiral gauge theories. We also clarify the different uses of these anomalies: including (1) anomaly cancellations of dynamical gauge fields, (2) ’t Hooft anomaly matching conditions of background fields of global symmetries. We apply several 4d anomaly constraints of Z16, Z4, and Z2 classes, beyond the familiar Feynman-graph perturbative Z class local anomalies. As an application, for SU(3)×SU(2)×U(1) Zq SM (with q = 1; 2; 3; 6) and SU(5) Grand Unification with 15n chiral Weyl fermions and with a discrete baryon minus lepton number X = 5(B L) 4Y preserved, we discover a new hidden gapped sector previously unknown to the SM and− Georgi-Glashow− model. The gapped sector at low energy contains either (1) 4d non-invertible topological quantum field theory (TQFT, above the energy gap with heavy fractionalized anyon excitations from 1d particle worldline and 2d string worldsheet, inaccessible directly from Dirac or Majorana mass gap of the 16th Weyl fermions [i.e., right-handed neutrinos], but accessible via a topological quantum phase transition), or (2) 5d invertible TQFT in extra dimensions.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparing Many-Body Approaches Against the Helium Atom Exact Solution
    SciPost Phys. 6, 040 (2019) Comparing many-body approaches against the helium atom exact solution Jing Li1,2, N. D. Drummond3, Peter Schuck1,4,5 and Valerio Olevano1,2,6? 1 Université Grenoble Alpes, 38000 Grenoble, France 2 CNRS, Institut Néel, 38042 Grenoble, France 3 Department of Physics, Lancaster University, Lancaster LA1 4YB, United Kingdom 4 CNRS, LPMMC, 38042 Grenoble, France 5 CNRS, Institut de Physique Nucléaire, IN2P3, Université Paris-Sud, 91406 Orsay, France 6 European Theoretical Spectroscopy Facility (ETSF) ? [email protected] Abstract Over time, many different theories and approaches have been developed to tackle the many-body problem in quantum chemistry, condensed-matter physics, and nuclear physics. Here we use the helium atom, a real system rather than a model, and we use the exact solution of its Schrödinger equation as a benchmark for comparison between methods. We present new results beyond the random-phase approximation (RPA) from a renormalized RPA (r-RPA) in the framework of the self-consistent RPA (SCRPA) originally developed in nuclear physics, and compare them with various other approaches like configuration interaction (CI), quantum Monte Carlo (QMC), time-dependent density- functional theory (TDDFT), and the Bethe-Salpeter equation on top of the GW approx- imation. Most of the calculations are consistently done on the same footing, e.g. using the same basis set, in an effort for a most faithful comparison between methods. Copyright J. Li et al. Received 15-01-2019 This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Accepted 21-03-2019 Check for Attribution 4.0 International License.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Numerical Projects Format for Electronic Delivery Of
    Introduction to numerical projects Here follows a brief recipe and recommendation on how to write a report for each project. • Give a short description of the nature of the problem and the eventual numerical methods you have used. • Describe the algorithm you have used and/or developed. Here you may find it con- venient to use pseudocoding. In many cases you can describe the algorithm in the program itself. • Include the source code of your program. Comment your program properly. • If possible, try to find analytic solutions, or known limits in order to test your program when developing the code. • Include your results either in figure form or in a table. Remember to label your results. All tables and figures should have relevant captions and labels on the axes. • Try to evaluate the reliabilty and numerical stability/precision of your results. If pos- sible, include a qualitative and/or quantitative discussion of the numerical stability, eventual loss of precision etc. • Try to give an interpretation of you results in your answers to the problems. • Critique: if possible include your comments and reflections about the exercise, whether you felt you learnt something, ideas for improvements and other thoughts you’ve made when solving the exercise. We wish to keep this course at the interactive level and your comments can help us improve it. We do appreciate your comments. • Try to establish a practice where you log your work at the computerlab. You may find such a logbook very handy at later stages in your work, especially when you don’t properly remember what a previous test version of your program did.
    [Show full text]
  • Photoelectric Effect Prac
    Name ___________________. Photoelectric Effect Prac 1. The threshold frequency in a photoelectric experiment is most closely related to the A) brightness of the incident light B) thickness of the photoemissive metal C) area of the photoemissive metal D) work function of the photoemissive metal 2. When a source of dim orange light shines on a photosensitive metal, no photoelectrons are ejected from its surface. What could be done to increase the likelihood of producing photoelectrons? A) Replace the orange light source with a red light source. B) Replace the orange light source with a higher frequency light source. C) Increase the brightness of the orange light source. D) Increase the angle at which the photons of orange light strike the metal. 3. The threshold frequency for a photoemissive surface is hertz. Which color light, if incident upon the surface, may produce photoelectrons? A) blue B) green C) yellow D) red 4. The threshold frequency of a metal surface is in the violet light region. What type of radiation will cause photoelectrons to be emitted from the metal's surface? A) infrared light B) red light C) ultraviolet light D) radio waves 5. Photons with an energy of 7.9 electron-volts strike a zinc plate, causing the emission of photoelectrons with a maximum kinetic energy of 4.0 electronvolts. The work function of the zinc plate is A) 11.9 eV B) 7.9 eV C) 3.9 eV D) 4.0 eV 6. The threshold frequency for a photoemissive surface is 1.0 × 1014 hertz. What is the work function of the surface? A) 1.0 × 10–14 J B) 6.6 × 10–20 J C) 6.6 × 10–48 J D) 2.2 × 10–28 J 7.
    [Show full text]
  • 9081872 Physics Jan. 01
    The University of the State of New York REGENTS HIGH SCHOOL EXAMINATION PHYSICS Tuesday, January 23, 2001 — 9:15 a.m. to 12:15 p.m., only The answer paper is stapled in the center of this examination booklet. Open the examination book- let, carefully remove the answer paper, and close the examination booklet. Then fill in the heading on your answer paper. All of your answers are to be recorded on the separate answer paper. For each question in Part I and Part II, decide which of the choices given is the best answer. Then on the answer paper, in the row of numbers for that question, circle with pencil the number of the choice that you have selected. The sample below is an example of the first step in recording your answers. SAMPLE: 1 2 3 4 If you wish to change an answer, erase your first penciled circle and then circle with pencil the num- ber of the answer you want. After you have completed the examination and you have decided that all of the circled answers represent your best judgment, signal a proctor and turn in all examination material except your answer paper. Then and only then, place an X in ink in each penciled circle. Be sure to mark only one answer with an X in ink for each question. No credit will be given for any question with two or more X’s marked. The sample below indicates how your final choice should be marked with an X in ink. SAMPLE: 1 2 3 4 For questions in Part III, record your answers in accordance with the directions given in the exami- nation booklet.
    [Show full text]
  • Sievert to Rem Conversion Table
    Sievert To Rem Conversion Table Jerrome remains repeatable after Galen unthaw robustiously or equilibrated any savagery. Tribadic disemboguesTheophyllus dehydrate so uninterruptedly. mentally while Grained Elihu Kingsley always dispeopledquakings his exemplarily. Grappelli merged errantly, he Gray conversion table above, sieverts rems are not necessary between sievert is that all premises and gamma rays being required in. How is radiation measured? Table 4 summarizes the units used for measuring radiation. Table B6 includes selected conversions from rem to sievert Table B6 Radiological. Bq per kilogram of meat is a large raise and consequently considered to be dangerous. All across our conventional units to rem conversion table below shows that work where accumulated radiation dose even when i can it? The units of dose equivalent are the sievert Sv and the rem. What is radiation exposure? Jerry, but a small error. Equivalent dose can be seen as an intermediate step in the calculation of effective dose. Internationale d'units the corresponding non-SI units their symbols and the conversion factors Table 3 Units of Radioactivity and Radiation Dose Quantity SI unit office symbol. When you are converting equivalent dose, you need a Röntgen Equivalent Man to Sievert converter that is elaborate and still easy to use. Sievert to Rem Conversion Nuclear Power Plants World Wide. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Radiation Converter Omni Calculator. Equivalent in rem conversion table gives you wish to sievert to rem conversion table shows the sievert. Do to sievert rem conversion table shows the table. We use sv, and their associated with a vital role in this is, or photons that you are likely candidate for.
    [Show full text]
  • Week 1: “Natural” Dimensions (Undergraduate)
    Week 1: \Natural" Dimensions (Undergraduate) In particle and nuclear physics, find it choosing energy as the basic dimension and defining the speed of light and Planck's constant c = ¯h ≡ 1 and dimension- less is often convenient Applying these more or less arbitary choices1 to physical laws determine a system of dimensions. This system is typically referred to as \natural."2 Designate the distance dimension L and the time dimension T . Then, for light (photon) motion, L and T are related by L = cT . Since c is dimensionless, L and T have the same natural dimension. The photon has energy, E = ¯h! = 2π¯hc/λ, where ! is the angular velocity, which has dimension 1=T , and λ is the wavelength, dimension L. From these, T = L = 1=[E], that is, the natural dimension of both time and distance is inverse energy.3 Since velocity is the ratio of a distance and a time interval, velocity must be (as c is) dimensionless, and always less than or equal to c. In general, nuclear and particle physicists report velocity as a fraction of c, or β = v=c, from Special Relativity. But because c = 1 and dimensionless, β = v. Because the ratio p=E = β = v is dimensionless, momentum's natural dimension is also energy. Because E = mc2, the natural dimension of mass is energy, as well. Since the (integral of) the (dot- )product between force and distance, R F · ds, gives (potential or kinetic) energy, force has the natural dimension of energy-squared. And so forth. 1. What is the natural dimension of acceleration? 2.
    [Show full text]