Vertical Profiling of Aerosol Hygroscopic Properties in The

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Vertical Profiling of Aerosol Hygroscopic Properties in The Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 7295–7315, 2016 www.atmos-chem-phys.net/16/7295/2016/ doi:10.5194/acp-16-7295-2016 © Author(s) 2016. CC Attribution 3.0 License. Vertical profiling of aerosol hygroscopic properties in the planetary boundary layer during the PEGASOS campaigns Bernadette Rosati1,a, Martin Gysel1, Florian Rubach2,3,b, Thomas F. Mentel2, Brigitta Goger1,c, Laurent Poulain3, Patrick Schlag2, Pasi Miettinen4, Aki Pajunoja4, Annele Virtanen4, Henk Klein Baltink5, J. S. Bas Henzing6, Johannes Größ3, Gian Paolo Gobbi7, Alfred Wiedensohler3, Astrid Kiendler-Scharr2, Stefano Decesari8, Maria Cristina Facchini8, Ernest Weingartner1,d, and Urs Baltensperger1 1Laboratory of Atmospheric Chemistry, Paul Scherrer Institute (PSI), 5232 Villigen, Switzerland 2Institute for Energy and Climate Research (IEK-8), Forschungszentrum Jülich, 52428 Jülich, Germany 3Leibniz Institute for Tropospheric Research, 04318 Leipzig, Germany 4Department of Applied Physics, University of Eastern Finland, 1627 Kuopio, Finland 5Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute (KNMI), 3730 De Bilt, the Netherlands 6Netherlands Organization for Applied Scientific Research (TNO), 80015 Utrecht, the Netherlands 7Institute of Atmospheric Sciences and Climate (ISAC-CNR), National Research Council, 00133 Rome, Italy 8Institute of Atmospheric Sciences and Climate (ISAC-CNR), National Research Council, 40129 Bologna, Italy anow at: Institute for Aerosol Physics and Environmental Physics, University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria bnow at: Max Planck Institute for Chemistry, 55128 Mainz, Germany cnow at: Institute of Meteorology and Geophysics, University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria dnow at: Institute for Aerosol and Sensor Technology, University of Applied Science Northwestern Switzerland, 5210 Windisch, Switzerland Correspondence to: Martin Gysel ([email protected]) Received: 26 January 2015 – Published in Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss.: 31 March 2015 Revised: 13 May 2016 – Accepted: 23 May 2016 – Published: 10 June 2016 Abstract. Vertical profiles of the aerosol particles hygro- 0:19 ± 0:07 for 500 nm particles, at ∼ 100 and ∼ 700 ma:g:l:, scopic properties, their mixing state as well as chemical respectively. The difference is attributed to the structure of composition were measured above northern Italy and the the PBL at this time of day which featured several inde- Netherlands. An aerosol mass spectrometer (AMS; for chem- pendent sub-layers with different types of aerosols. Later ical composition) and a white-light humidified optical par- in the day the vertical structures disappeared due to the ticle spectrometer (WHOPS; for hygroscopic growth) were mixing of the layers and similar aerosol particle properties deployed on a Zeppelin NT airship within the PEGASOS were found at all probed altitudes (mean κ ≈ 0:18 ± 0:07). project. This allowed one to investigate the development The aerosol properties observed at the lowest flight level of the different layers within the planetary boundary layer (100 ma:g:l:) were consistent with parallel measurements at (PBL), providing a unique in situ data set for airborne aerosol a ground site, both in the morning and afternoon. Overall, particles properties in the first kilometre of the atmosphere. the aerosol particles were found to be externally mixed, with Profiles measured during the morning hours on 20 June 2012 a prevailing hygroscopic fraction. The flights near Cabauw in the Po Valley, Italy, showed an increased nitrate frac- in the Netherlands in the fully mixed PBL did not feature tion at ∼ 100 m above ground level (a.g.l.) coupled with en- altitude-dependent characteristics. Particles were also exter- hanced hygroscopic growth compared to ∼ 700 ma:g:l. This nally mixed and had an even larger hygroscopic fraction result was derived from both measurements of the aerosol compared to the results in Italy. The mean κ from direct mea- composition and direct measurements of the hygroscopicity, surements was 0:28 ± 0:10, thus considerably higher than κ yielding hygroscopicity parameters (κ) of 0:34 ± 0:12 and values measured in Italy in the fully mixed PBL. Published by Copernicus Publications on behalf of the European Geosciences Union. 7296 B. Rosati et al.: Vertical profiling of aerosol hygroscopic properties 1 Introduction is the hygroscopicity tandem differential mobility analyzer (HTDMA; see e.g. Liu et al., 1978, or McMurry and Stolzen- Aerosol particles directly have an impact on climate by ab- burg, 1989, for details). It explores particle growth in the sub- sorbing or scattering the solar radiation. The optical proper- saturated RH range and was employed successfully in several ties depend on the particles’ size as well as their chemical ground-based campaigns (compare the review by Swietlicki composition and both can be altered at elevated relative hu- et al., 2008). This method investigates GFs at high precision midities (RH) if the particles are hygroscopic (Boucher et al., but needs several minutes for a full measurement cycle which 2013). makes it rather unsuited for airborne measurements. Besides, Most particles are emitted or formed in the planetary its detection range is limited to a maximal dry mobility diam- boundary layer (PBL), the lowermost layer of the tropo- eter of approximately 250 nm. HTDMA and chemical com- sphere. The PBL is subject to changes depending on the position hygroscopicity closures were performed at various strength of the incident solar radiation (compare Stull, 1988): sites including urban (see e.g. Kamilli et al., 2014) and rural under clear sky conditions heating of the Earth’s surface by regions (see e.g. Wu et al., 2013), as well as elevated moun- solar radiation induces convective turbulence and therefore tain sites (e.g. Kammermann et al., 2010). a well-mixed PBL builds up after midday ranging up to an To our knowledge, only few campaigns report airborne hy- altitude of approximately 2 km. During night when the sur- groscopicity results due to the lack of suitable instruments face cools down, several sub-layers are present in the PBL for this kind of measurements. The first instrument built for where the uppermost part is defined as the residual layer this special task is the aerosol hydration spectrometer (AHS; (RL). The RL contains a mixture of emissions and back- Hegg et al., 2007). The set-up comprises two optical instru- ground aerosol from the day before and is decoupled from ments, to measure the properties of the dry and humidified the surface. Close to the ground a stable nocturnal layer (NL) aerosol particles. However, quantifying hygroscopic growth develops where local and/or regional emissions accumulate. with the AHS is difficult as the measurement is performed Once the sun rises a new mixing layer (ML) is formed which for poly-disperse rather than size-selected aerosol samples. is separated from the other layers through a temperature in- The differential aerosol sizing and hygroscopicity spectrom- version. Throughout the day this ML evolves until it reaches eter probe (DASH-SP; Sorooshian et al., 2008) is using a up to the free troposphere and extends across the whole PBL. combination of differential mobility analysis (DMA) and op- The dynamics of the sub-layers in the PBL and its effect on tical particle spectrometry (OPS) and has successfully been the properties of the aerosol particles in these layers are still applied for airborne GF measurements at sub-saturated RH. poorly understood. This instrument is limited to small sizes in the range of Airborne studies were previously performed to investi- 150–225 nm dry diameters. In the aircraft campaigns an at- gate the aerosol chemical composition as a function of al- tempt was made to reconcile simultaneously measured chem- titude utilizing an aerosol mass spectrometer and show- ical composition and hygroscopic growth using an AMS and ing that chemical composition varies with height (Morgan DASH-SP. Herein, Hersey et al.(2009, 2013) focused their et al., 2009, 2010a,b; Pratt and Prather, 2010). Accordingly, studies on the free troposphere in the marine atmosphere off aerosol hygroscopicity, which depends on chemical compo- the coast of California. sition and can also be inferred from it, is also expected to be Most measurement techniques to study hygroscopicity se- height dependent. Morgan et al.(2010a) conducted flights lect particles smaller than ∼ 300 nm, which implies that over north-western Europe, focusing on changes between species that are more abundant at larger sizes (e.g. sea salt, 0 and 10 km a.g.l. In general aircraft campaigns commonly mineral dust) cannot be easily investigated. This may induce stretch over large areas and altitudes, often above the PBL, a bias in estimates of the humidity effects on hygroscopic therefore providing only limited information on the PBL it- growth and light scattering efficiency of particles in the upper self. On the other hand, extensive data sets studying the vari- accumulation mode size range. Indeed, Zieger et al.(2011) ability of aerosol composition and hygroscopic properties are presented a comparison between HTDMA measurements for available from ground-based studies. However, surface mea- dry diameters of 165 nm and calculated GFs using size dis- surements are not always representative for aerosol proper- tributions, scattering enhancement factors (based on poly- ties at elevated altitudes. disperse aerosol particles in the PM1 range) and Mie theory. One way to explore the hygroscopic properties of aerosols The comparison revealed that indeed in the presence of sea
Recommended publications
  • Media Contact: Abby Mayo [email protected] | 617.488.2803
    Media Contact: Abby Mayo [email protected] | 617.488.2803 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Hanover Hanover residents Mike and Mary Lawlor fly in the Goodyear Blimp as Sullivan Tire and Auto Service contest winners. Sullivan Tire and Auto Service took to the skies to celebrate 64 years of business as they offered guests a ride on a Goodyear Blimp. On September 18th and 19th, Goodyear’s Wingfoot Two flew over Plymouth Harbor carrying lucky Sullivan Tire contest winners. Sullivan Tire, who has been a Goodyear Tire dealer for more than 40 years, is also offering a Goodyear sale through the end of September. “As a partner of Goodyear for over 40 years, we are thrilled to be celebrating our anniversary on the Goodyear Blimp above Plymouth Harbor and to bring along some of our customers who have been with us over these 64 years,” said Paul Sullivan, Vice President of Marketing for Sullivan Tire. Wingfoot Two, a Zeppelin NT model blimp, can carry 14 passengers and is the only airship in Goodyear’s fleet that has been stationed at all three of the company’s U.S. bases. It had made four cross-country transits between Ohio and California, and has appeared at the NBA Finals, the Oscars, the College Football Playoffs, numerous PGA Tour events, and the Rose Parade. About Sullivan Tire and Auto Service: Headquartered in Norwell, MA, Sullivan Tire and Auto Service is New England's home for automotive and commercial truck care with 73 retail locations; 15 commercial truck centers; 13 wholesale, 3 tire retread, and 2 LiftWorks facilities; and 2 distribution centers.
    [Show full text]
  • Goodyear – Civilian Blimps
    Goodyear – civilian blimps Peter Lobner, 24 August 2021 1. Introduction Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company began their involvement with lighter-than-air (LTA) vehicles in 1912, when the company developed a fabric envelope suitable for use in airships and aerostats. The first blimps manufactured by the Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company were B-Type blimps ordered by the US Navy in 1917 for convoy escort duty. Goodyear (envelope supplier) and Curtiss Aeroplane (gondola supplier) produced 9 of the 17 B-Type blimps ordered. Goodyear also supplied the envelopes for some of the Navy’s 10 C-Type patrol blimps, which were delivered in 1918, after the end of WW I. Both the B- and C-Type blimps used hydrogen as the lift gas. In 1923, Goodyear teamed with German firm Luftschiffbau Zeppelin and created a new subsidiary, Goodyear Zeppelin Corporation. In June 1925, their Type AD Pilgrim (NC-9A) made its first flight and became Goodyear’s first blimp to use helium lift gas. Pilgrim was certified later in 1925, becoming the first US commercial airship. Goodyear Zeppelin Corporation filed a patent application for a nonrigid airship in September 1929, describing the objectives of their invention as follows: “This invention relates to non-rigid airships, and it has particular relation to the suspension of pilot cars or gondolas from the envelopes of non-rigid airships. The principal object of the invention is to provide a non-rigid airship in which the envelope and the pilot car or engine car are so constructed as to offer the minimum air resistance. Another object of the invention is to provide connections between the envelope and pilot car that are not exposed to the airstream for sustaining the weight of the pilot car, as well as stabilizing it against lateral or longitudinal movement.” 1 In patent Figure 1, the pressurized lift gas envelope (10) contains an air ballonet (12, for adjusting airship buoyancy) and a load suspension system for carrying and distributing the weight of the gondola (11) affixed under the envelope and the thrust loads from the with attached engines.
    [Show full text]
  • Keck Study Airships; a New Horizon for Science”
    Keck Study Airships; A New Horizon for Science” Scott Hoffman Northrop Grumman Aerospace Systems May 1, 2013 Military Aircraft Systems (MAS) Melbourne FL 321-951-5930 Does not Contrail ITAR Controlled Data Airship “Lighter than Air” Definition Airplanes are heavier than air and fly because of the aerodynamic force generated by the flow of air over the lifting surfaces. Balloons and airships are lighter-than-air (LTA), and fly because they are buoyant, which is to say that the total weight of the aircraft is less than the weight of the air it displaces.1 The Greek philosopher Archimedes (287 BC – 212 B.C.) first established the basic principle of buoyancy. While the principles of aerodynamics do have some application to balloons and airships, LTA craft operate principally as a result of aerostatic principles relating to the pressure, temperature and volume of gases. A balloon is an unpowered aerostat, or LTA craft. An airship is a powered LTA craft able to maneuver against the wind. 1 NASA Web site U.S. Centennial of Flight Commission http://www.centennialofflight.gov/index2.cfm Does not Contain ITAR Controlled Data Atmospheric Airship Terminology • Dirigible – Lighter-than-air, Engine Driven, Steerable Craft • Airship –Typically any Type of Dirigible – Rigid –Hindenburg, USS Macon, USS Akron USS Macon 700 ft X 250 ft – Semi-Rigid – Has a Keel for Carriage and Engines • NT-07 Zeppelin Rigid – Non-Rigid – Undercarriage and Engines Support by the Hull • Cylindrical Class-C – “Blimp” – Goodyear, Navy AZ-3, Met Life Blimp, Blue Devil Simi-Rigid
    [Show full text]
  • Manufacturing Techniques of a Hybrid Airship Prototype
    UNIVERSIDADE DA BEIRA INTERIOR Engenharia Manufacturing Techniques of a Hybrid Airship Prototype Sara Emília Cruz Claro Dissertação para obtenção do Grau de Mestre em Engenharia Aeronáutica (Ciclo de estudos integrado) Orientador: Prof. Doutor Jorge Miguel Reis Silva, PhD Co-orientador: Prof. Doutor Pedro Vieira Gamboa, PhD Covilhã, outubro de 2015 ii AVISO A presente dissertação foi realizada no âmbito de um projeto de investigação desenvolvido em colaboração entre o Instituto Superior Técnico e a Universidade da Beira Interior e designado genericamente por URBLOG - Dirigível para Logística Urbana. Este projeto produziu novos conceitos aplicáveis a dirigíveis, os quais foram submetidos a processo de proteção de invenção através de um pedido de registo de patente. A equipa de inventores é constituída pelos seguintes elementos: Rosário Macário, Instituto Superior Técnico; Vasco Reis, Instituto Superior Técnico; Jorge Silva, Universidade da Beira Interior; Pedro Gamboa, Universidade da Beira Interior; João Neves, Universidade da Beira Interior. As partes da presente dissertação relevantes para efeitos do processo de proteção de invenção estão devidamente assinaladas através de chamadas de pé de página. As demais partes são da autoria do candidato, as quais foram discutidas e trabalhadas com os orientadores e o grupo de investigadores e inventores supracitados. Assim, o candidato não poderá posteriormente reclamar individualmente a autoria de qualquer das partes. Covilhã e UBI, 1 de Outubro de 2015 _______________________________ (Sara Emília Cruz Claro) iii iv Dedicator I want to dedicate this work to my family who always supported me. To my parents, for all the love, patience and strength that gave me during these five years. To my brother who never stopped believing in me, and has always been my support and my mentor.
    [Show full text]
  • NRP Post Happ a Publication of NASA Research Park Winter 2009-2010
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration w Year y Ne NRP Post Happ A publication of NASA Research Park Winter 2009-2010 SV STAR, Inc. brings Green Aviation Research to Ames by Diane Farrar A sleek Pipistrel Sinus motorglider sits in Ames’ Hangar N211A being prepped for modification. Its gas powered engine will be removed, and an electric motor and battery pack installed for the aircraft to fly solely on electric power. This electric conversion is the first step in a new collaborative green aviation research effort between NASA Ames, Stanford University and Silicon Valley Space Technology & Applied Research, Inc. (SV STAR). SV STAR was co-founded by San Gunawardana, currently completing his PhD in Aerospace Engineering at Stanford, and Photo Courtesy Charles Barry, Santa Clara University Photo Courtesy Charles Barry, NASA Research Park partner Andrew Gold. SV STAR pur- CREST Santa Clara University students (L-R): Mike Rasay, Paul Mahacek, Jose Acain, Ignacio Mas chased the Pipistrel in August 2009 to support the joint venture’s first green aviation research project. SV STAR chose the Pip- From the Surf to Above the Earth - Students Conduct istrel aircraft for its efficiency and flexibility as a test platform. Pipistrels have won several green aviation competitions in the Missions at NRP’s Center for Robotic Exploration past, including the NASA sponsored CAFE (Comparative Air- and Space Technologies craft Flight Efficiency Foundation) competitions for efficiency by Dr. Christopher Kitts, Director, CREST and noise pollution. The Center for Robotic Exploration and Space Technologies “We are creating a rich environment for applied research and the development (CREST) students have been active this past year, conducting a wide of very interesting technology,” said Gold.
    [Show full text]
  • Press Release
    PRESS RELEASE Aviation authorities grant approval for shipment of parts for final assembly of three Zeppelin NT in the USA Friedrichshafen, 17th July 2012: After extensive preparation work and a successful audit carried out by the Luftfahrt-Bundesamt (German Civil Aviation Authority) on behalf of the European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), ZLT Zeppelin Luftschifftechnik GmbH & Co KG has been granted approval to undertake manufacturing work in accordance with aviation guidelines at Wingfoot Lake in Suffield, Ohio. The audit evaluated material and inventory control processes and quality control. In 2011, the tyre manufacturer Goodyear ordered three new Zeppelin NT of the type LZ N07-101 for its airship bases in Ohio, Florida and California. As part of this contract it was agreed that the final assembly of the zeppelins would be carried out in the specially adapted Goodyear airship hangar at Wingfoot Lake in Suffield, Ohio. As an approved production organisation for the Zeppelin NT (New Technology), ZLT shall principally be in charge of final assembly. The production site and processes must, however, comply with the specifications for an approved production organisation. During a 5 day audit in May 2012, Robert Gritzbach, ZLT Chief Technical Officer, and Reinhard Klein, Technical Auditor with the Luftfahrt-Bundesamt, satisfied themselves of the suitability of the production facilities in Suffield. "In particular, we examined and inspected the material and inventory control processes, checked whether Goodyear can guarantee quality assurance for the entire logistic chain and how document management will be organised," Robert Gritzbach said. The impression won by the Zeppelin representative with respect to the setting up of the necessary procedures and processes was one of professionalism.
    [Show full text]
  • Advanced Airship Design [Pdf]
    Modern Airship Design Using CAD and Historical Case Studies A project present to The Faculty of the Department of Aerospace Engineering San Jose State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Science in Aerospace Engineering By Istiaq Madmud May 2015 approved by Dr. Nikos Mourtos Faculty Advisor AEROSPACE ENGINEERING Modern Airship Design MSAE Project Report By Istiaq Mahmud Signature Date Project Advisor: ____________________ ______________ Professor Dr. Nikos Mourtos Project Co-Advisor: ____________________ ______________ Graduate Coordinator: ____________________ ______________ Department of Aerospace Engineering San Jose State University San Jose, CA 95192-0084 Istiaq Mahmud 009293011 Milpitas, (408) 384-1063, [email protected] Istiaq Mahmud Modern Airship Design 2 AEROSPACE ENGINEERING Istiaq Mahmud Modern Airship Design 3 AEROSPACE ENGINEERING Non‐Exclusive Distribution License for Submissions to the SJSU Institutional Repository By submitting this license, you (the author(s) or copyright owner) grant to San Jose State University (SJSU) the nonexclusive right to reproduce, convert (as defined below), and/or distribute your submission (including the abstract) worldwide in print and electronic format and in any medium, including but not limited to audio or video. You agree that SJSU may, without changing the content, convert the submission to any medium or format for the purpose of preservation. You also agree that SJSU may keep more than one copy of this submission for purposes of security, back‐up and preservation. You represent that the submission is your original work, and that you have the right to grant the rights contained in this license. You also represent that your submission does not, to the best of your knowledge, infringe upon anyone's copyright.
    [Show full text]
  • MS-388: James R. Shock Airship Collection
    MS-388: James R. Shock Airship Collection Collection Number: MS-388 Title: James R. Shock Airship Collection Dates: 1908-2010 (Bulk 1994-1999) Creator: Shock, James R., 1924-2010 Summary/Abstract: The James R. Shock Airship Collection documents the progression of airships from the early experimental prototypes of the late 19th century to the surveillance blimps used by the United States government today. The collection includes numerous photographs of military and civilian airships, blimps, and barrage balloons, along with detailed descriptions of the photographs. Included is Mr. Shock’s research for the airship books and articles he wrote over the years, magazine articles, newspaper clippings, military and civilian regulations, airship calendars, and slide presentations. Quantity/Physical Description: 18 linear feet Language(s): English, limited German and French Repository: Special Collections and Archives, Paul Laurence Dunbar Library, Wright State University, Dayton, OH 45435-0001, (937) 775-2092 Restrictions on Access: There are no restrictions on accessing material in this collection. Restrictions on Use: Copyright restrictions may apply. Unpublished manuscripts are protected by copyright. Permission to publish, quote or reproduce must be secured from the repository and the copyright holder. Preferred Citation: [Description of item, Date, Box #, Folder #], MS-388, James R. Shock Airship Collection, Special Collections and Archives, University Libraries, Wright State University, Dayton, Ohio. Acquisition: James R. Shock donated the collection to Special Collections and Archives, Wright State University Libraries, in September 2007, with additions received in May 2009, June 2010, and October 2010. Separated Material: Airship books and magazines were removed from the collection, cataloged, and are available for viewing in the Special Collections and Archives Reading Room.
    [Show full text]
  • © in This Web Service Cambridge University Press
    Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-01970-6 - Airship Technology: Second Edition Gabriel Alexander Khoury Index More information Index A-60 Lightship, simple external support system, polyurethane based, 455 173 properties of materials, 114 A-60s adiabatic compression, superheating lift gas, 290 benefitting from presence of a light headwind, adiabatic heating, large airships more affected by, 334 670 compared to CargoLifter CL 160, 307 Adler airship (AS 80 GD), 609 A-150s, benefitting from presence of a light Adler fashion company, 608 headwind, 334 Advanced Hybrid Aircraft (AHA), 622 AAI Corporation, 472 advertisement abnormal convective activity, 151 activities of LZ NT 07, 555 Absolute Temperature, 392 banner space on sides of manned airships, 580 AC electrical generation system, in SkyCat 20, 470 Zeppelin NT qualified for, 563 acceleration Aereon Company, triple-hull airship, 462 capabilities, 672 Aereon Corporation, 466 load factors, 154 aerial advertising, as main market for hot-air scaling for an airship, 324 airships, 604, 607 access aerial crane, 513 to airship’s life-support systems at all times, 289 aerial exploration, by unmanned airships, 586 gaining to underside of structure, 313 aerial footage, in addition to advertising space, 581 as a generic operational GH problem, 288–289 aerial photogrammetry, of archaeological sites, and maintenance requirements, 216, 219 608 space for engine bay, 222 aerial vehicles, absence of rigidly-structured (1789 to various parts of an airship, 253–254 to 1899), 314 access steps (Himmelstreppe), into the Aerobatic Human Powered Airship, cycloidal crew/passenger accommodation, 320 propellers for, 628 accidental overload, 164 Aerocrane accidents, weather frequently reported as a major of All American Engineering Corporation, 22 cause of airship, 328 concept, 477 ACLS.
    [Show full text]
  • To What Extent Does Modern Technology Address the Problems of Past
    To what extent does modern technology address the problems of past airships? Ansel Sterling Barnes Today, we have numerous technologies we take for granted: electricity, easy internet access, wireless communications, vast networks of highways crossing the continents, and flights crisscrossing the globe. Flight, though, is special because it captures man’s imagination. Humankind has dreamed of flight since Paleolithic times, and has achieved it with heavier-than-air craft such as airplanes and helicopters. Both of these are very useful and have many applications, but for certain jobs, these aircraft are not the ideal option because they are loud and waste energy. Luckily, there is an alternative to energy hogs like airplanes or helicopters, a lighter-than-air craft that predates both: airships! Airships do not generate their own lift through sheer power like heavier-than-air craft. They are airborne submarines of a sort that use a different lift source: gas. They don’t need to use the force of moving air to lift them from the ground, so they require very little energy to lift off or to fly. Unfortunately, there were problems with past airships; problems that were the reason for the decline of airships after World War II: cost, pilot skill, vulnerability to weather, complex systems control, materials, size, power source, and lifting gas. This begs the question: To what extent does modern technology address the problems of past airships? With today’s technology, said problems can be managed. Most people know lighter-than-air craft by one name or another: hot air balloons, blimps, dirigibles, zeppelins, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • The Zeppelin Flight Experience
    Zeppelin flights Book from Friedrichshafen online now! 30-minutes flight € 255.00* How to find us: Route „Friedrichshafen“ By car: 45-minutes flight € 370.00* From Friedrichshafen drive towards “Messe” and follow Route “Lindau Shore“ the signs for “Zeppelin-Flüge/-Halle”. Langenargen, Kressbronn, Nonnenhorn, Lindau Route “Meersburg“ By bus: Immenstaad, Hagnau, Meersburg Line 5 from “Friedrichshafen-Hafenbahnhof” (harbour station) Route “Salem“ or “Friedrichshafen Stadtbahnhof” (town station) to “Messe”. Markdorf, Salem, Hagnau Get off at bus stop “Zeppelin-Hangar” or “Messe-West”. Zeppelin NT – Guided Hangar Tour Route “Ravensburg“ (only bookable in Mar. – June and Oct./Nov.) Tettnang, Waldburg, Ravensburg, Meckenbeuren By boat: Immerse yourself in the fascinating world of Zeppelins. 60-minutes flight € 470.00* Catamaran ferry between Friedrichshafen and Konstanz as well With a Zeppelin NT hangar tour, you will learn about as other ferry services operated on Lake Constance. Further Route “Mainau“ the unique technology of the most modern passenger information may be obtained at www.bsb.de or www.bodo.de. Hagnau, Meersburg, Pfahlbauten, Mainau Island, Konstanz airships close up. Route “Bregenz“ Langenargen, Lindau, Bay of Bregenz including Pfänder mountain We offer guided tours from March – November (during the and Seebühne (lake stage) flight season). Route “Swiss Shore“ Langenargen, Altenrhein, Arbon, Romanshorn, Immenstaad Dates: Tuesday and Friday, 4 pm Route “St. Gallen“ (only bookable in Mar. / Apr. / Oct. / Nov.) Prices Please book before 2 pm Langenargen, St. Gallen, Arbon, Romanshorn Phone: +49 (0) 7541 5900-343 2018/19 Fax: +49 (0) 7541 5900-22343 90-minutes flight € 655.00* E-mail: [email protected] Route “Radolfzell“ www.fsb-welfenburg.de | Information valid as of October 2018 | Information valid www.fsb-welfenburg.de Immenstaad, Konstanz, Reichenau, Radolfzell, Steckborn, Duration of the tour: about 45 minutes.
    [Show full text]
  • The Airships
    BY: Arjumand-Bano The Airships By Arjumand Bano (13005001010) Research Supervisor: Sir Kalim- Ur- Rehman A Research Project Submitted to Aviation Management In Partial fulfillment of requirement of Degree of Aviation Management Department of Institute of Aviation Studies University of Management and Technology Johar Town, Lahore May, 2017 Preface his project “The Airships” is done as a part of BS Aviation Management which has to be done in last semester in University of Management and T Technology, Lahore. I am glad to dedicate this project to Sir Kalim- Ur- Rehman which is project supervisor and without their guidance this project cannot be done competently. I am thankful to my parents and teachers who guided me in this project. For preparing the project I studied different websites related to airships. The data related to airships is easily available on internet. The research is based on airships types, its history, construction, biographies, modern airships etc. I tried my level best to put maximum information related to airships and keep the project from inaccuracies. If this project can help anyone to increase his/her information and knowledge I will feel that the purpose of my hard work has been achieved. ------------------------- Arjumand-Bano ID: 13005001010 Batch#5 Email: [email protected] BS Aviation Management (2013-2017) University of Management and Technology, Lahore. Acknowledgement t is genuine pleasure to express my deep sense of thanks and gratitude to supervisor Sir Kalim- Ur -Rehman. Their keen interest and dedication above I all their overwhelming attitude to help their students had been solely and largely responsible for completing my work.
    [Show full text]