Geothermal Project Design Is a Closed Loop System; the Geothermal Production Water Remains Securely Behind Pipe from Production to Injection

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Geothermal Project Design Is a Closed Loop System; the Geothermal Production Water Remains Securely Behind Pipe from Production to Injection From: Lindsey Cymbalisty - MVLWB To: Permits Subject: FW: Mattson Re-injection Date: Monday, February 06, 2012 3:31:29 PM Attachments: Borealis Mattson Re-injection MVLWB 2012.pdf Ft Liard Geology Report FINAL.pdf Please post these two documents under MV2012L4-001 and MV2012X0001, Initial Application, Application and Related Documents. Please let me know when they are up, so I can send out a notice this afternoon. Thanks, Lindsey From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: February-06-12 12:00 PM To: Lindsey Cymbalisty - MVLWB Cc: [email protected] Subject: Mattson Re-injection Hello Lindsey As a reference, our geothermal project design is a closed loop system; the geothermal production water remains securely behind pipe from production to injection. The water is produced and re- injected without any exposure to surface environment or potable water aquifers. However, in lieu of the Nation Energy Board not being involved with the Fort Liard Geothermal Project, I thought it may be helpful to address the use of the Mattson formation for re-injection of the geothermal production water. This formation has been used in the past for re-injection and I thought it may be accommodating to reference some of these wells and geological environment, and address any potential concerns. If you see it as helpful, I have attached a document that can be added to our file. Any questions feel free to give me a call, Happily going green, Craig Dunn, P.Geol Borealis Geopower [email protected] #(403) 461 8802 February 5, 2012 Lindsey Cymbalisty Regulatory Officer MacKenzie Valley Land and Water Board 7th Floor, 4922 48th Street Yellowknife, NT X1A 2P6 Attn: MacKenzie Valley Land and Water Board Re: Geological Analysis on Re-injection for Fort Liard Geothermal Project Borealis Geopower is currently working on the development of a smaller scale geothermal energy project in Fort Liard, NWT. The project would entail bringing cost effective electricity generation and direct heat opportunities to a native community that is currently producing its power from diesel generation. The Borealis Remote Geothermal Project will consist of a geothermal power plant with associated heat exchangers, a ~4,300m production well and ~1,500m injection well. This power and heat created will be completely ‘green’ and sustainable, with minimal emissions of any air pollutants or GHG’s, cover a small ground footprint and is expected to be indefinitely renewable. The use of injection wells is common practice in the oil and gas industry as a method of disposing formation waters and reducing exposure of formation waters to surface environments. There are a number of economic and technical advantages to the re-injection of the formation fluids into a shallower formation; however, it requires that the injection formation can be categorized as a ‘containing reservoir’. A well-designed injection program will prevent formation waters from coming into contact with surface environment and local potable aquifers. There are two potential sources of contamination from the use of disposal wells: permeability between geological formations allowing vertical movement of fluids and the vertical movement along the well casing itself. The use of the Mattson formation as a viable re-injection or disposal well is well recognized by both the National Energy board and BC Energy. The Mattson is a porous, high permeability sandstone zone with overlying low permeability shale zones within the Garbutt and Fantasque formations. This offers an ideal opportunity for water re-injection and the formation has already been used as water disposal for wells in the industry at multiple locations in the Liard Basin. Wells that have been used for injection or water disposal into the Mattson formation include: QUESTERRE BEAVER D- 064-K/094-N-16: This well in Northern BC dates back to 1957, but is currently in still operation as a water disposal well. It was pressure tested in 1998- the wellhead was serviced and injection capability confirmed. QUESTERRE BEAVER B-A019-K/094-N-16: This well in Northern BC was also permitted as a water disposal well into the Mattson formation. From April 1999 to December 2012 there was 336,832 m3 of water injected. DEVON KOTANEELEE YT M-17: This well within the Liard Basin in the NWT was also designated as a water disposal well. Formation top for the Mattson is 959.5m TVD (similar Borealis GeoPower Inc. www.borealisgeopower.com Calgary, Alberta, Canada depths to our drilling program for Fort Liard) and 382.5m of the Mattson were drilled (TD of 1332.0m). There are multiple drill stem tests and core samples run on this well. The full well report is available through the National Energy Board. CHEVRON ET AL MCKAY LAKES 0-80: This well was spudded in 1999 (most recent) and is in close proximity to the Fort Liard Property. A full injectivity test was completed for this well. There is a clear shale zone greater than 100m thick in the Garbutt formation recognized in the wireline/gamma logging data set. Fort Liard Project specifics: The design of this project’s production and injection wells for geothermal power production is very similar in design to oil and gas development in the area. Formation (non- potable) water will be sourced from the Nahanni formation (~4,170m TVD to 4,320m TVD (True Vertical Depth) and is intended to be re-injected into the Mattson formation (705m TVD- 1460m TVD). All depths of formation tops were calculated from offsetting wells and seismic analysis. The Nahanni Formation is a vuggy dolomitic limestone and the Mattson Formation is a deltaic Quartzenite sandstone. The geological environment at the proposed geothermal drilling location at Fort Liard is well documented in Borealis’s “Fort Liard Geology Report” and references all the key formations that would be encountered with the drilling program. The formation to be injected into is the Mattson and consists mainly of stacked fluvial, deltaic sandstone that is yellowish grey to pale red, submature to mature and siliceous to calcareous and dolomitic. Quartzenite dominates, but there are thin intervals of shale, limestone, dolostone, coal and chert. Based on extensive offset well analysis and available seismic data, the Mattson is approximately 755m thick; the top of the formation is estimated to be at 705m TVD and bottom of the formation is 1460m TVD. One of the overlying low permeability zones, the Garbutt formation, is composed of dark grey shale and siltstone with sideritic concretions. There are two main divisions: a lower and an upper unit. The lower unit is composed of silty mudstone, argillaceous siltstone, sideritic concretions and a few thin seams of bentonite and has a glauconitic basal mudstone. The upper unit is mainly rubbly mudstone with rows of reddish brown weathering and has sideritic concretions. The upper beds include argillaceous siltstone and thin beds of laminated sandstone. As directly measured in the wells of the Fort Liard area, the range of thickness of the formation is from 50-261 m, and has an average thickness of 140 m. Directly above the Mattson is the Fantasque formation, which is rhythmically bedded and composed of spicular chert, shale and siltstone. A thin basal lag deposit of phosphate and chert nodules and pebbles exists in north-eastern British Columbia. As directly measured in the wells of the Fort Liard area, the range of thickness of the formation is from 2-194 m, with an average thickness of 118 m. These low permeability caps above our intended injection formation are expected to be thick enough to by far withstand any injection pressures induced by the injection well. As for the risk of vertical movement of fluids along the well casing itself, this is the fundamental reason for extensive well design and strict drilling protocol to prevent cross- contamination between formations (including potable water aquifers and the surface environment). Borealis has acquired well design services from Codeco Energy Group to ensure Borealis GeoPower Inc. www.borealisgeopower.com Calgary, Alberta, Canada that our well design conforms to all required specifications as per National Energy Board (NEB) “ Drilling and Production Guidelines” (COGOA: Canada Oil and Gas Operations Act). If there is any uncertainty or gaps in these regulations for our specific drilling application, we will be following the more detailed ERCB (Energy Resources Conversation Board) regulations. An example of this is the “Director 008 Surface Casing Depth Requirements” for protecting groundwater with surface casing. Adhering to these extensive drilling regulations for well design and drilling procedures (including casing, cementing and pressure testing) is standard practice for all oilfield wells drilled in the Western Canada Sedimentary basin, including those in the NWT. If there are any other questions regarding the well design or use of the Mattson as an injection reservoir please feel free to contact me directly. Sincerely, Craig Dunn, P.Geol. Chief Operating Officer: Borealis GeoPower #403-461-8802 [email protected] Borealis GeoPower Inc. www.borealisgeopower.com Calgary, Alberta, Canada ADK/Borealis Geothermal Energy Project: Geological & Geothermal Energy Resource Assessment Submitted to: Primary Author: Craig Dunn, P.Geol. Borealis Geopower Inc. August 24 , 2011 Contents TABLE OF FIGURES .................................................................................................................................................................. 3 EXECUTIVE
Recommended publications
  • Helium in Northeastern British Columbia
    HELIUM IN NORTHEASTERN BRITISH COLUMBIA Elizabeth G. Johnson1 ABSTRACT Global demand for helium is increasing at a time when world reserves are in decline. The price of grade A helium has quadrupled in the past 12 years. Liquefied natural gas (LNG) processing can be used to capture helium as a value-added byproduct at concentrations as low as 0.04% by volume. The Slave Point, Jean Marie (Redknife) and Wabamun formations of northeastern British Columbia preferentially have helium associated with many of their natural gas pools. The mechanism for this accumulation appears to be flow in hydrothermal brines from helium-enriched basement granitic rocks along deeply seated faults. Separately, the Evie member of the Horn River Formation also has anomalous helium accumulation in its shale gas related to uranium decay in organic-rich shales. Johnson, E.G. (2012): Helium in northeastern British Columbia; in Geoscience Reports 2013, British Columbia Ministry of Natural Gas Development, pages 45–52. 1Geoscience and Strategic Initiatives Branch, British Columbia Ministry of Natural Gas Development, Victoria, British Columbia; [email protected] Key Words: Helium, LNG, Jean Marie, Slave Point, Wabamun, Evie, Horn River Formation INTRODUCTION optical fibre technology (8% of global use; Peterson and Madrid, 2012; Anonymous, 2012). Helium is a nonrenewable resource that has developed In recognition of its strategic value, the United States important strategic value. Helium (atomic number of 2) ex- 4 created the Federal Helium Reserve in the Bush Dome Res- ists primarily as the stable isotope, He, which is produced ervoir, Texas, in 1925. The primary source for the Federal on the earth through alpha decay of radioactive elements Helium Reserve is the world-class Hugoton Reservoir in such as uranium and thorium.
    [Show full text]
  • Pa 62-15.Pdf
    GEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF CANADA CANADA PAPER 62-15 MIDDLE DEVONIAN AND OLDER PALAEOZOIC FORMATIONS OF SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MACKENZIE AND ADJACENT AREAS B y Helen R. Belyea and A. W. Norris DEPARTMENT OF MINES AND TECHNICAL SURVEYS CANADA CONTENTS Page Introduction. • . • . • • . • • . • • . • • 1 Ordovician and older(?) . • . • . • • • • • . • . • 1 Old Fort Island Formation........................... 2 Mirage Point Formation ...•...•..•. ,................ 2 Pre-Chinchaga beds . • • • . • • . • . • • • • . • . • • . • 3 Middle Devonian • . • . • . • • . • . • . • . • • . • 3 Chinchaga Formation ..•.•.••.•........•.•••••. • . • • • 3 Keg River Formation . • . • . • . • . • . • • • . 4 Muskeg Formation.................................. 5 Pine Point Formation................. .............. 5 Lonely Bay Formation • . • • • • . • . • • • • . • • 9 Sulphur Point Formation . • • . • . • . • . • . • . • • . • • . • . 10 Presqu 1ile Formation............................... 11 Watt Mountain Formation. • . • • • • . • . • . • • • • • . • . • . 12 Slave Point Formation . • • . • • • . • • . • • • • • • . • • • 12 Horn River Formation . • . • • . • • . • • • . • . • 14 References.............................................. 16 Appendix-logs of wells . • • • . • • • • • • . • . • • . • • • • • . • • . 19 Illustrations Figure 1. Formational nomenclature ••......•... .. .....•. Frontispiec e 2. Correla tion diagram from Pan American et al. A-1 Snake River c-28-D well to Imperial Triad Davidson C reek P-2 well .. ... ... •. .... ... .. in pocket 3. Correlation
    [Show full text]
  • British Columbia Regional Guide Cat
    National Marine Weather Guide British Columbia Regional Guide Cat. No. En56-240/3-2015E-PDF 978-1-100-25953-6 Terms of Usage Information contained in this publication or product may be reproduced, in part or in whole, and by any means, for personal or public non-commercial purposes, without charge or further permission, unless otherwise specified. You are asked to: • Exercise due diligence in ensuring the accuracy of the materials reproduced; • Indicate both the complete title of the materials reproduced, as well as the author organization; and • Indicate that the reproduction is a copy of an official work that is published by the Government of Canada and that the reproduction has not been produced in affiliation with or with the endorsement of the Government of Canada. Commercial reproduction and distribution is prohibited except with written permission from the author. For more information, please contact Environment Canada’s Inquiry Centre at 1-800-668-6767 (in Canada only) or 819-997-2800 or email to [email protected]. Disclaimer: Her Majesty is not responsible for the accuracy or completeness of the information contained in the reproduced material. Her Majesty shall at all times be indemnified and held harmless against any and all claims whatsoever arising out of negligence or other fault in the use of the information contained in this publication or product. Photo credits Cover Left: Chris Gibbons Cover Center: Chris Gibbons Cover Right: Ed Goski Page I: Ed Goski Page II: top left - Chris Gibbons, top right - Matt MacDonald, bottom - André Besson Page VI: Chris Gibbons Page 1: Chris Gibbons Page 5: Lisa West Page 8: Matt MacDonald Page 13: André Besson Page 15: Chris Gibbons Page 42: Lisa West Page 49: Chris Gibbons Page 119: Lisa West Page 138: Matt MacDonald Page 142: Matt MacDonald Acknowledgments Without the works of Owen Lange, this chapter would not have been possible.
    [Show full text]
  • Conventional Natural Gas Play Atlas Northeast British Columbia
    ����������������������������������� �������������������������� ������������������������������������� ���������������������� ������������������������������������������ Ministry of Energy, Mines and Petroleum Resources 1 CoverAtlas.indd 1 15/03/2006 1:55:13 PM British Columbia Ministry of Energy, Mines and Petroleum Resources Oil & Gas Division, Resource Development & Geoscience Branch 6th floor – 1810 Blanshard Street Victoria, British Columbia V8W 9N3 Contact: Vic Levson, Director Petroleum & Aggregate Geoscience E-mail: [email protected] Fax: (250) 952-0922 Web site: www.em.gov.bc.ca/oilandgas Library and Archives Canada Cataloguing in Publication Data Main entry under title: Conventional natural gas play atlas, northeast British Columbia (Petroleum geology publication ; 2006:1) Includes bibliographical references: p. ISBN 0-7726-5532-4 1. Natural gas reserves - British Columbia, Northern - Atlases. 2. Geology, Economic - British Columbia, Northern - Atlases. I. British Columbia. Resource Development and Geoscience Branch. II. Series. TN882.C32B74 2006 553.2’8509711870223 C2006-960061-9 2 Conventional Natural Gas Play Atlas: Northeast BC Ministry of Energy, Mines and Petroleum Resources 3 The Northeast BC Play Atlas The Resource Development and Geoscience Branch of the BC Ministry of Energy and Mines and Petroleum Resources (MEMPR) in partnership with the National Energy Board (NEB) have undertaken an assessment of British Columbia’s undiscovered resources. The final report entitled Northeast British Columbia’s Ultimate Potential for Natural Gas Report - 2006A is now available through both the NEB and MEMPR websites. To access the report on the provincial government website, go to: http://www.em.gov.bc.ca/subwebs/oilandgas/resource/cog/cog.htm. While this new report covers all of BC’s gas potential areas, the major focus of the assessment is the quantification of the remaining undiscovered conventional gas potential of NEBC.
    [Show full text]
  • 3LMANUSCRIPT REPORT SERIES No. 36
    DFO - L bra y MPOBibio heque II 1 111111 11 11 11 V I 1 120235441 3LMANUSCRIPT REPORT SERIES No. 36 Some If:eat/viz& 3,5,unamia, Olt the Yacific ettadt of South and ✓ cuith anwitica, T. S. Murty, S. 0. Wigen and R. Chawla Marine Sciences Directorate 975 Department of the Environment, Ottawa Marine Sciences Directorate Manuscript. Report Series No. 36 SOME FEATURES OF TSUNAMIS ON THE PACIFIC COAST OF SOUTH AND NORTH AM ERICA . 5 . Molly S . O. Wigen and R. Chawla 1975 Published by Publie par Environment Environnement Canada Canada I' Fisheries and Service des !Aches Marine Service et des sciences de la mer Office of the Editor Bureau du fiedacteur 116 Lisgar, Ottawa K1 A Of13 1 Preface This paper is to be published in Spanish in the Proceedings of the Tsunami Committee XVII Meeting, Lima, Peru 20-31 Aug. 1973, under the International Association of Seismology and Physics of the Earth Interior. 2 Table of Contents Page Abstract - Resume 5 1. Introduction 7 2. Resonance characteristics of sonic inlets on the Pacific Coast of Soulh and North America 13 3. Secondary undulations 25 4. Tsunami forerunner 33 5. Initial withdrawal of water 33 6. Conclusions 35 7. References 37 3 4 i Abstract In order to investigate the response of inlets to tsunamis, the resonance characteristics of some inlets on the coast of Chile have been deduced through simple analytical considerations. A comparison is made with the inlets of southeast Alaska, the mainland coast of British Columbia and Vancouver Island. It is shown that the general level of intensif yy of secondary undulations is highest for Vancouver Island inlets, and least for those of Chile and Alaska.
    [Show full text]
  • Mapping Known and Potential Karst Areas in the Northwest Territories, Canada
    Mapping Known and Potential Karst Areas in the Northwest Territories, Canada Derek Ford, PGeo., PhD, FRSC. Emeritus Professor of Geography and Earth Sciences, McMaster University [email protected] For: Environment and Natural Resources, Government of the Northwest Territories August 2009 (i) Executive Summary The Goal of this Report is to Produce Maps of the Known and Potential Karst Landform Sites in the Northwest Territories (NWT) Karst landforms are those created by the dissolution of comparatively soluble rocks and the routing of the water (from rain or snowmelt) underground via caves rather than at the surface in river channels. The principal karst rocks are salt (so soluble that it is scarcely seen at the surface in the NWT), gypsum and anhydrite (solubility around 2500 mg/l of water), and limestone and dolomite (solubility around 250 -350 mg/l). All of these rock types are common and widespread amongst the sedimentary strata in the NWT. Surface karst landforms include: a) karren, which are spreads of individually small solution pits, shafts, and runnels that, collectively, may cover many hectares (limestone pavements); b) sinkholes of solutional, collapse, or other origin that can be tens to hundreds of metres in diameter and proportionally as deep. Sinkholes are considered the diagnostic karst landform worldwide; c) larger topographically closed depressions that may flood or drain seasonally, poljes if flat-floored, otherwise turloughs; d) extensive dry valleys and gorges, dry because their formative waters have been captured underground. All water sinking underground via karst landforms of all sizes drain quickly in comparison with all other types of groundwater because they are able to flow through solutionally enlarged conduits, termed caves where they are of enterable size.
    [Show full text]
  • Geochemical, Petrophysical and Geomechanical Properties Of
    Geochemical, petrophysical and geomechanical properties of stratigraphic sequences in Horn River Shale, Middle and Upper Devonian, Northeastern British Columbia, Canada by TIAN DONG A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences University of Alberta © Tian Dong, 2016 ABSTRACT The Middle and Upper Devonian Horn River Shale, comprising the Evie and Otter Park members and the Muskwa Formation, northeast British Columbia, Canada is recognized as a significant shale gas reservoir in the Western Canada Sedimentary Basin. However, many aspects of this shale formation have not been adequately studied, and the published geochemical, petrophysical and geomechanical data are limited. This work aims to document the controls of geochemical composition variation on petrophysical and geomechanical properties and the relationship of rock composition to lithofacies and stratigraphic sequences. A detailed core-based sedimentological and wireline log analysis was conducted by my colleague Dr. Korhan Ayranci as a parallel study, in order to classify lithofacies, interpret depositional environments and establish sequence stratigraphic framework across the basin. Major and trace elements concentrations, key trace element ratios and Corg-Fe-S relationships were used to understand the effect of sea level fluctuation on detrital flux, redox conditions, productivity and therefore organic carbon enrichment patterns. Detrital sediment flux indicated by the concentration of aluminum and titanium to the basin was found to be higher during transgressions than regressions. Redox conditions, exhibiting strong correlation to TOC content, were the primary controls on the organic carbon deposition. The bottom water conditions are more anoxic during transgressions than regressions.
    [Show full text]
  • Biostratigraphy and Paleoecology of the Upper Devonian Ithaca Formation Near Cortland, New York
    Biostratigraphy and Paleoecology of the Upper Devonian Ithaca Formation near Cortland, New York by Jonathan W. Harrington Geological Consultant Groton, New York and W. Graham Heaslip State University College at Cortland Cortland, New York It i s particularly appropriate that we examine the Ithaca Formation in the Cortland area during the Golden Anniversary Meeting of the New York State Geological Association. The rocks of this region are of con­ siderable historical interest, having received attention since the earli­ est days of geolog ical investigation in New York State . In fact, the presence of fossil shells in the Devonian rocks of New York was first noted in 1751 at a hillside outcrop in Cortland County by John Bartram, a member of the Lewis Evans Onondaga expedition (We lls, 1963). The New York Devonian is unique in its completeness, fossil content. numerous outcrops, and relatively undisturbed nature. It is the standard reference section for North America and displays a classic example of facies transition. Stratigraphic and paleontologic investigation over the past century has produced a wealth of infonnation, but uDespite this, perhaps another century of rigorous study wi ll be required before a thor­ ough understanding of its paleontology, lithology, stratigraphy and paleoecology can be attained. n (Rickard. 1964). The early stratigraphic work in the Upper Devonian of New York was done mainly by James Hall. J. M. Clarke. and H. S. Williams between 1840 and 1915 . These workers subdivided the succession, described the faunas and attempted to correlate along the strike. Due to comp l ex interfinger­ ing of the argillaceous western sequence with the thicker arenaceous eastern sequence, correlations proved difficult.
    [Show full text]
  • Toponyms and the Fabric of Provincial History : a Review Article S
    Toponyms and the Fabric of Provincial History : A Review Article S. E. READ And Cain knew his wife; and she con­ ceived, and bare Enoch; and he builded a city, and called the name of the city, after the name of his son, Enoch, (GENESIS 4,17) Place names, as is obvious in this early passage from the Bible, have long been of interest to mankind. Without question, their existence predates recorded history, from the time that man first started to communicate with fellow man; from the moment that someone said, "I live by the Red River," or "I dwell by the Oxen's Ford." For place names exist in all parts of the world and are recorded in all languages. For centuries they have been the subject of scholarly investigation (see, for example, the opening paragraphs of John Stowe's Survey of London, 1598); have stimulated the organization of learned societies and the publication of learned journals; and have given birth to such hard academic terms as "toponym," "toponomy," and toponymie," or "topnymical." In British Columbia place names present a demanding challenge — by no means as yet fully answered. Indians, of many tribes, speaking many dialects, have had their dwellings here for thousands of years. They named places but they kept no written records. Within each of these names is embedded some myth or legend, or some fragment of history but their origins have all too often been lost in the passage of time or obscured by linguistic difficulties. Then, some mere two hundred years ago, came the white explorers — Spanish, English, Scottish, French — first by sea and then by land.
    [Show full text]
  • Liard Basin Hydrocarbon Project: Shale Gas Potential of Devonian-Carboniferous Strata in the Northwest Territories, Yukon and Northeastern British Columbia
    Liard Basin Hydrocarbon Project: Shale Gas Potential of Devonian-Carboniferous Strata in the Northwest Territories, Yukon and Northeastern British Columbia Kathryn M. Fiess, Northwest Territories Geoscience Office, Yellowknife, NT [email protected] and Filippo Ferri, Oil and Gas Division, BC Ministry of Energy, Mines and Natural Gas, Victoria, BC [email protected] and Tiffani L. Fraser, Yukon Geoscience Survey, Whitehorse, YT [email protected] and Leanne J. Pyle, VI Geoscience Services Ltd., Brentwood Bay, BC [email protected] and Jonathan Rocheleau, Northwest Territories Geoscience Office, Yellowknife, NT [email protected] Summary The Liard Basin Hydrocarbon Project was initiated in 2012 to examine the shale gas potential of Middle Devonian to Carboniferous strata based on integrated subsurface and outcrop-based field studies. The project is a collaboration of the Northwest Territories Geoscience Office (NTGO) with the Yukon Geological Survey, the British Columbia Ministry of Energy, Mines and Natural Gas and the Geological Survey of Canada. The primary objective of the project is to evaluate source rocks and refine stratigraphic correlation within the basinal succession of the Middle to Upper Devonian Besa River Formation and its Horn River “Formation” equivalents (Evie, Otter Park, and Muskwa members), as well as the Upper Devonian to Mississippian Exshaw Formation and Mississippian Golata Formation. The Liard Basin lies within three jurisdictions: the Northwest Territories (NT), Yukon (YK) and British Columbia (BC). In northeast BC it hosts several gas fields but remains largely underexplored in the NT and YK. During the initial field season, more than 500 m of strata were measured and described from three sections: 1) Golata Formation in the NT; 2) Besa River Formation in the YK; and 3) Besa River Formation in northeast BC.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix E-1-1: Acid Rock Drainage and Metal Leaching Field Investigation
    AMEC Earth & Environmental a division of AMEC Americas Limited 2227 Douglas Road, Burnaby, BC Canada V5C 5A9 Tel +1 (604) 294-3811 Fax +1 (604) 294-4664 www.amec.com Acid Rock Drainage and Metal Leaching Field Investigation Enbridge Northern Gateway Project Submitted to: Northern Gateway Pipelines Inc. Calgary, AB Submitted by: AMEC Earth & Environmental, a division of AMEC Americas Limited Burnaby, BC October 2009 Revised February 16, 2010 AMEC File: EG09260.2300 Document Control No.: 1128-RG-20091022 Northern Gateway Pipelines Inc. Acid Rock Drainage and Metal Leaching Field Investigation October 2009 Revised February 16, 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS .......................................................................................................... v GLOSSARY ................................................................................................................................ vi EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .............................................................................................................. 1 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................. 2 1.1 Background ................................................................................................................. 2 1.2 Scope of Work ............................................................................................................. 2 2.0 INTRODUCTION TO ACID ROCK DRAINAGE ..................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Paper 61-13 Camsell Bend and Root River Map-Areas
    PAPER 61-13 CAMSELL BEND AND ROOT RIVER MAP-AREAS, DISTRICT OF MACKENZIE, NORTHWEST TERRITORIES 95Jand K (Report, 2 maps, 2 figures) R. J. W. Douglas and D. K. Norris DEC 5 1961 . _.. Price 50 cents 1961 GEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF CANADA CANADA PAPER 61-13 CAMSELL BEND AND ROOT RIVER MAP-AREAS, DISTRICT OF MACKENZIE, NORTHWEST TERRITORIES 95 J,K By R. J. W. Douglas and D. K. Norris DEPARTMENT OF MINES AND TECHNICAL SURVEYS CANADA 51310-1 ROGER DUHAMEL, F. R. S. C. QUEEN'S PR INTER AND CONTROLLER OF STATIONERY OTTAWA, 1961 Pri ce 50 ce nts Cat. No. M44-6 1 11 CONTENTS Page Introduction .•••••••••••••••••••••• • • •••••••••••••••.••.•• References • • • • • • . • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • . • • . • • • • • • • • • • 1 Physical features........ ................................ 3 Stratigraphy......... ....... .................... ......... 5 Table of formations • • • • • • • • • . • . • • • . • . • • • • • • • . • • • • • • • 8-9 Palaeozoic •.•• , .............................. • • • • • • 6 Ordovician and older {?) - Sunblood formation ( 1) • • • . • • • • • • • . • • . • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • . 6 Ordovician and younger - map-units 2-10, including the Whittaker (3), Delorme (4), Camsell (5), Mount Kindle (7), a nd Sombre (10) formations • • • • • • • . • . • • • • • • • • • • • . • • • • • • • • . • • • . • 7 Middle Devonian and older { ? ) - map-units 11-17, comprising the Arnica {11), Manetoe (12), Fune ral (13), Bear Rock (14), Landry (15), Headless (16), and Nahanni (17) formations....... 14 Upper Devonian - map-units 18-25, including
    [Show full text]