RF Annual Report
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
In the Privy Council on Appeal from the Court of Appeal of Pitcairn Islands
IN THE PRIVY COUNCIL ON APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEAL OF PITCAIRN ISLANDS No. of 2004 BETWEEN STEVENS RAYMOND CHRISTIAN First Appellant LEN CALVIN DAVIS BROWN Second Appellant LEN CARLISLE BROWN Third Appellant DENNIS RAY CHRISTIAN Fourth Appellant CARLISLE TERRY YOUNG Fifth Appellant RANDALL KAY CHRISTIAN Sixth Appellant A N D THE QUEEN Respondent CASE FOR STEVENS RAYMOND CHRISTIAN AND LEN CARLISLE BROWN PETITIONERS' SOLICITORS: Alan Taylor & Co Solicitors - Privy Council Agents Mynott House, 14 Bowling Green Lane Clerkenwell, LONDON EC1R 0BD ATTENTION: Mr D J Moloney FACSIMILE NO: 020 7251 6222 TELEPHONE NO: 020 7251 3222 6 PART I - INTRODUCTION CHARGES The Appellants have been convicted in the Pitcairn Islands Supreme Court of the following: (a) Stevens Raymond Christian Charges (i) Rape contrary to s7 of the Judicature Ordinance 1961 and s1 of the Sexual Offences Act 1956 (x4); (ii) Rape contrary to s14 of the Judicature Ordinance 1970 of the Sexual Offences Act 1956. Sentence 4 years imprisonment (b) Len Carlisle Brown Charges Rape contrary to s7 of the Judicature Ordinance 1961, the Judicature Ordinance 1970, and s1 of the Sexual Offences Act 1956 (x2). Sentence 2 years imprisonment with leave to apply for home detention The sentences have been suspended and the Appellants remain on bail pending the determination of this appeal. HUMAN RIGHTS In relation to human rights issues, contrary to an earlier apparent concession by the Public Prosecutor that the Human Rights Act 1978 applied to the Pitcairn Islands, it would appear not to have been extended to them, at least in so far as the necessary protocols to the Convention have not been signed to enable Pitcairners to appear before the European Court: R (Quark Fisheries Ltd) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs [2005] 3 WLR 7 837 (Tab ). -
University of Vermont, College of Medicine Bulletin University of Vermont
University of Vermont ScholarWorks @ UVM University of Vermont College of Medicine University Libraries Catalogs 1961 University of Vermont, College of Medicine Bulletin University of Vermont Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarworks.uvm.edu/dmlcatalog Part of the Medicine and Health Sciences Commons Recommended Citation University of Vermont, "University of Vermont, College of Medicine Bulletin" (1961). University of Vermont College of Medicine Catalogs. Book 101. http://scholarworks.uvm.edu/dmlcatalog/101 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the University Libraries at ScholarWorks @ UVM. It has been accepted for inclusion in University of Vermont College of Medicine Catalogs by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks @ UVM. For more information, please contact [email protected]. \V\e<i, ~-\\-~, Wl~,t.;; (' I 0 \cl6l-(o8 BULLETIN OF THE UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT BURLINGTON, VERMONT COLLEGE OF MEDICINE DECEMBER 15, 1961 CATALOGUE 1961-1962 l BULLETIN OF THE UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT ,. THE COLLEGE OF MEDICINE CATALOGUE BULLETIN OF THE UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT VOLUME 59 DECEMBER 15, 1961 NUMBER 8 P1tblished by The University of Vermont, Burlingtcm, Vermcmt eizhtem time a year-once each in November, January, February, April, June and A11gust; three times i11 September and December, and twice i11 October, March and May. Secmtd-class postage paid at B1trlingto1t, Vt. The official legal title of the Corporation is The University of V ermo11t tmd State Agricult11ral College. Address all communications to the Dean's Office, College of Medicine, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont Telephone UN 4-4 511, extension 2 5 1 CALENDAR 1961-62 September 1 5 Friday Enrollment and Payment of Fees. -
Final Report of the Rockefeller Foundation Bellagio Center Convening: October 21–23, 2015
FINAL REPORT OF THE ROCKEFELLER FOUNDATION BELLAGIO CENTER CONVENING: OCTOBer 21–23, 2015 SUPPORTED BY FRONT COVER, FRONTISPIECE, PAGE 17, AND BACK COVER. Survivors in Guinea, Liberia, and Sierra Leone continue to face stigma, trauma, and long-term effects of the virus (AP Photo). II EFFECTIVE PUBLIC HEALTH COMMUNICATION IN AN INTERCONNECTED WORLD CONTENTS 2 Introduction – Setting the Scene: 30 Expert Insights: Key Areas Public Health Communication in an of Need and Opportunity Interconnected World 31 i. Barriers to Building Trust 4 Objectives of this Project in Public Health Communications 6 About KYNE and Ebola Deeply 36 ii. Collecting and Scaling Best Practices 7 Acknowledgments 38 iii. Managing Social Media 10 The High Stakes for Mass Public Engagement of Communication Failures 41 iv. Improving the Impact of Mainstream Media Coverage 12 How Communication Can Help or Hinder a Response 44 Developing Tools and Technology 13 i. Case Study – Ebola in West Africa: 45 i. Advanced Technology Platforms BBC Media Action 47 ii. Internet Forums and Websites 18 ii. Case Study – Managing SARS in Singapore 48 iii. Research and Knowledge Management Systems 25 iii. Case Study – Legionnaires’ Disease in New York City: The New York 50 Communications City Office of Emergency and Public Health Governance Preparedness and Response 51 i. Effective Leadership Communication 52 ii. The Role of National and Regional Governments 54 iii. Inclusive Communication at the Community Level 56 Shaping Effective Community Engagement 57 i. Conscious Community Engagement 58 ii. Communicating with Communities (CwC) 60 iii. Enhanced Partnerships with Local Media 64 Conclusion and Recommendations 67 Key Recommendations INTRODUCTION Search and rescue operations underway in Port-au-Prince on January 15, 2010 (Photo by IFRC/Eric Quintero via Flickr). -
Democracy & Philanthropy
DEMOCRACY & PHILANTHROPY The Rockefeller Foundation and the American Experiment the rockefeller foundation centennial series democracy & philanthropy the rockefeller foundation and the american experiment By Eric John Abrahamson Sam Hurst Barbara Shubinski Innovation for the Next 100 Years Rockefeller Foundation Centennial Series 2 Chapter _: Democracy & Philanthropy 3 4 Chapter _: Democracy & Philanthropy 5 6 Chapter _: Democracy & Philanthropy 7 8 Chapter _: Democracy & Philanthropy 9 Preface from Dr. Judith Rodin 14 Foreword – Justice Sandra Day O'Connor 18 1 The Charter Fight 24 11 Government by Experts 52 111 Philanthropy at War 90 © 2013 by Rockefeller Foundation have been deemed to be owned by 1v The Arts, the Humanities, The Rockefeller Foundation Centennial Series the Rockefeller Foundation unless we and National Identity 112 Foreword copyright Justice Sandra Books published in the Rockefeller were able to determine otherwise. Day O’Connor Foundation Centennial Series provide Specific permission has been granted All rights reserved. case studies for people around the by the copyright holder to use the v Foundations Under Fire 144 world who are working “to promote the following works: well-being of humankind.” Three books Top: Rockefeller Archive Center Equal Opportunity for All 174 Bottom: John Foxx. Getty Images. highlight lessons learned in the fields Ruthie Abel: 8-9, 110-111 v1 of agriculture, health, and philanthropy. Art Resource: 26 Three others explore the Foundation’s Book design by Pentagram. The Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of v11 Democracy and Design work in Africa, Thailand, and the United Public Health: 57 States. For more information about Democracy & Philanthropy: Department of Special Collections in America's Cities 210 the Rockefeller Foundation Centennial and University Archives, Marquette The Rockefeller Foundation and initiatives, visit http://centennial. -
John D. Rockefeller (1839-1937) Topic Guide for Chronicling America (
John D. Rockefeller (1839-1937) Topic Guide for Chronicling America (http://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov) Introduction John D. Rockefeller was an oil industry tycoon and philanthropist who lived in Cleveland, Ohio. Born in New York in 1839, he moved with his family to northeast Ohio in 1853. At age sixteen, he began his involvement with the business world as an assistant bookkeeper for a produce commission business. He soon began his own produce commission company before joining the oil refinery industry in 1863. He established Standard Oil of Ohio in 1870, and this is where he made most of his wealth. By 1878, the company controlled 90% of all U.S. oil refineries (it was declared a trust by the U.S government in 1911). In addition to his business interests, Rockefeller regularly donated a portion of his income to charities supporting education and public health. Rockefeller died in 1937 and is buried in Lake View Cemetery in Cleveland. He is widely recognized as the wealthiest American of all time. Important Dates . July 8, 1839: John Davison Rockefeller is born in Richford, New York. 1853: The Rockefeller family moves to Strongsville, a suburb of Cleveland, Ohio. 1863: Rockefeller and business partner Maurice B. Clark build an oil refinery in “The Flats” area of Cleveland. 1864: Rockefeller marries Laura Celestia “Cettie” Spelman. January 10, 1870: Standard Oil of Ohio is formed and grows rapidly over the next decade, eventually forming a monopoly. 1903: Rockefeller’s General Education Board is founded. 1911: U.S. Supreme Court declares that Standard Oil Company of New Jersey is a trust, and it is broken into subsidiaries. -
The Pitcairn Islands the World’S Largest Fully Protected Marine Reserve
A fact sheet from March 2015 The Pitcairn Islands The world’s largest fully protected marine reserve Overview In March 2015, the United Kingdom declared the world’s largest fully protected marine reserve in the remote waters surrounding the Pitcairn Islands in the South Pacific Ocean. The designation marks the first time any government has combined creation of a fully protected marine area with detailed plans for surveillance and enforcement that include use of the most up-to-date technology available. This approach sets a new standard for the comprehensive monitoring of protected areas. In 2013, The Pew Charitable Trusts and The National Geographic Society joined the local government, the Pitcairn Island Council, in submitting a proposal calling for creation of a marine reserve to protect these spectacular waters. The Pitcairn Islands Marine Reserve spans 834,334 square kilometres (322,138 square miles). Together with the Chagos Marine Reserve in the Indian Ocean, designated in 2010, the United Kingdom has created the world’s two biggest fully protected marine areas, totalling 1,474,334 square kilometres (569,243 square miles). Through these actions, the United Kingdom—caretaker of the fifth-greatest amount of marine habitat of any country in the world—has established its place as a global leader in ocean conservation. Pitcairn Islands Marine Reserve Traditional and cultural non-commercial fishing by the Pitcairn islanders and their visitors is permitted within 2 nautical miles of the summit of 40 Mile Reef and in a transit zone between Pitcairn and 40 Mile Reef. © 2015 The Pew Charitable Trusts Encompassing 99 per cent of Pitcairn’s exclusive economic zone, the Pitcairn Islands Marine Reserve is about 3½ times the size of the land area of the United Kingdom. -
In the Pitcairn Islands Supreme Court T 1/2011 In
IN THE PITCAIRN ISLANDS SUPREME COURT T 1/2011 IN THE MATTER under the Constitution of Pitcairn and the Bill of Rights 1688 AND IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to the vires of parts of the Pitcairn Constitution being ultra vires the Bill of Rights 1688 AND IN THE MATTER OF a constitutional challenge and the refusal of the Magistrates Court to refer a constitutional challenge to the Supreme Court and the failure of the Supreme Court to consider an appeal from the Magistrates Court AND CP 1/2013 IN THE MATTER OF a judicial review of the Attorney General and Governor BETWEEN MICHAEL WARREN Applicant/Appellant AND THE QUEEN Respondent Hearing: 07 to 11 and 14 to 17 April 2014; 01 August 2014; 23 September 2014 Appearances: Kieran Raftery and Simon Mount for the Crown Tony Ellis and Simon Park (on 23 September 2014) for Applicant/Appellant Judgment: 28 November 2014 ______________________________________________________________________ JUDGMENT OF HAINES J ______________________________________________________________________ This judgment was delivered by me on 28 November 2014 at 10 am pursuant to the directions of Haines J Deputy Registrar Table of Contents Para Nr Introduction [1] Course of the hearing [11] The application for a stay on the grounds of abuse of process – the self- determination claim The submission [19] The right to self-determination – sources [22] Ius cogens [24] Internal self-determination – treaty obligations of the UK – the Charter of the United Nations [32] Internal self-determination – treaty obligations of the UK – -
K-12 NATIONAL TESTING ACTION PROGRAM (NTAP) Connecting Schools with the Nation’S Leading Testing Companies to Safely Reopen TABLE of CONTENTS
K-12 NATIONAL TESTING ACTION PROGRAM (NTAP) Connecting schools with the nation’s leading testing companies to safely reopen TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction and current K-12 landscape 7 Successful programs: testing works to keep schools safer 12 K-12 National Testing Action Program: overview 24 K-12 National Testing Action Program: logistics 39 Appendix and references 53 2 CONTEXT The K-12 National Testing Action Program (NTAP) is a plan to provide free Covid-19 testing for K-12 public schools to enable safe in-person learning Situation Complication Question Answer • Due to Covid-19, a • Teachers, students and • How do we safely and 1. Implementation of full majority of US K-12 communities may fear the spread sustainably re-open the safety and mitigation public schools are of Covid-19 in schools nation’s K-12 public activities operating remotely or in • Schools are not fully equipped to schools as quickly as hybrid learning 2. Prioritized vaccination provide necessary mitigation possible? for teachers and staff • Online learning is not an measures including testing • How do we make testing 3. Weekly testing for adequate replacement • While testing capacity exists, labs free, easy and widely for in-person school and students, teachers and do not have a clear signal on how available for schools? staff is creating large to make capacity readily education and available to schools socialization gaps • The value of testing is getting lost amid the focus on vaccination 3 K-12 NATIONAL TESTING ACTION PROGRAM (NTAP) SUMMARY (1 OF 2) The school changes -
The Pitcairn Islands Marine Reserve (PDF)
A fact sheet from March 2015 The Pitcairn Islands Marine Reserve A global benchmark in marine protection Overview In September 2016, the United Kingdom created a fully protected marine reserve spanning about 830,000 square kilometres (320,465 square miles) in the remote waters surrounding the Pitcairn Islands in the South Pacific Ocean. The designation marked the first time that any government combined creation of a large, isolated and fully protected marine area with detailed plans for surveillance and enforcement that included use of the most up-to-date technology. This approach set a new standard for the comprehensive monitoring of protected areas. Three years earlier, in 2013, The Pew Trusts and the National Geographic Society had joined the local government, the Pitcairn Island Council, in submitting a proposal calling for creation of a marine reserve to safeguard these waters that teem with life. Together with the Chagos Marine Reserve in the Indian Ocean, designated in 2010, the United Kingdom has created two of the largest fully protected marine areas, totalling 1,470,000 square kilometres (567,017 square miles). Through these actions, the British government—caretaker of the fifth-greatest amount of marine habitat of any country in the world—has established its place as a global leader in ocean conservation. Pitcairn Islands Marine Reserve Traditional and cultural non-commercial fishing by the Pitcairn islanders and their visitors is permitted within 2 nautical miles of the summit of 40 Mile Reef and in a transit zone between Pitcairn and 40 Mile Reef. © 2017 The Pew Trusts Encompassing 99 per cent of Pitcairn’s exclusive economic zone, the Pitcairn Islands Marine Reserve is about 3½ times the size of the land area of the United Kingdom. -
RF Annual Report
THE ROCKEFELLER FOUNDATION ANNUAL REPORT FOR 1966 JAN 26 ZD01 2003 The Rockefeller Foundation 31S-3 THE ROCKEFELLER FOUNDATION 111 WEST 50TH STREET, NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10020 PRINTED IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 2003 The Rockefeller Foundation CONTENTS Trustees, Officers, and Committees, 1966-1967 VIII Officers and Staff, 1966 X THE PRESIDENT'S REVIEW Technology and Nutrition 3 Agriculture as an Industry 4, The Technology of Nutrition 4, New Biological Materials 5, Progress through International Institutes 8, The Search for Quality 11 Toward the Conquest of Hunger 14 Wheat 15, Corn 17, Rice 20, Sorghum and the Millets 23, Potatoes 24, Animal Sciences 27, Nutrition—Protein Sources 29, Institutional Development 31, Schistosomiasis Control 33, Agricultural Economics 35 Problems of Population 38 Teaching and Research in Reproductive Biology and Family Planning 41, Teaching and Research in Demography 47, Training Programs for Professional Personnel 47, Hospital- based Family Planning Programs 49 University Development 52 The University of Ibadan 54, The University of Valle 56, The University of the Philippines 62, Bangkok, Thailand 63, The University of Khartoum 66, Santiago, Chile 68, The University of East Africa 71 Aiding Our Cultural Development 76 Symphonic Music 81, Contemporary Chamber Ensembles 85, Teacher Training and Performer Training 85, Theatre 87, Playwrights 91, Actors and Directors 91, Audience Develop- ment 92, Dance 95, Creative Writing 95, The Humanities and the New Technology 97 Toward Equal Opportunity for All 100 Student -
RF Annual Report
IDENT'S REVIEW ANNUAL REPORT 970 THE FOUND AT/ON JAN 2 ^001 LIBRARY THE ROCKEFELLER FOUNDATION © 2003 The Rockefeller Foundation \no THE ROCKEFELLER FOUNDATION 111 WEST 50TH STREET, NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10020 PRINTED IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 2003 The Rockefeller Foundation CONTENTS Trustees, Counsel, Officers, and Staff VI The President's Review XV 1J Conquest of Hunger 3 Problems of Population 37 University Development 57 Quality of the Environment 83 ' Equal Opportunity for All 105 Cultural Development 127 Allied Interests 149 Study Awards 161 Organizational Information 171 Financial Statements 175 2003 The Rockefeller Foundation TRUSTEES AND TRUSTEE COMMITTEES April 1970—April 297J BOARD OF TRUSTEES BARHYBlNGHAM BlLL MOVERS RALPH J. BUNCHE' JOHN D. ROCKEFELLER SRD JOHN S. DICKEY JOHN D. ROCKEFELLER IV C. DOUGLAS DILLON ROBERT V. ROOSA ROBERT H. EBERT FREDERICK SEITZ LORD FRANKS OF HEADiNCTON1 FRANK STANTON ROBERT F. GOHEEN CYRUS R. VANCE2 J. GEORGE HARRAR THOMAS J. WATSON, JR. THEODORE M. HESBURCH CLIFTON R. WHARTON, JR.2 ARTHUR A. HOUGHTON, JR. W. BARRY WOOD, JR.3 CLARK KERR WHITNEY M. YOUNG. JR.3 ALBERTO LLERAS CAMAHGO EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE THE PRESIDENT Chairman FREDERICK SEITZ C. DOUGLAS DILLON FRANK STANTON BILL MOVERS RoBERT F- GoHEEN alternate member JOHN D. ROCKEFELLER SBD WHITNEY M. YOUNG, JR/ ROBERT V. ROOSA alternate member FINANCE COMMITTEE C. DOUGLAS DILLON Chairman FRANK STANTON ROBERT V. ROOSA alternate member THOMAS J. WATSON, JR. THE PRESIDENT ARTHUR A. HOUGHTON, JR. THK CHAIRMAN OF THK alternate member ' • BOARD OF TRUSTEES 1 Retired June 1970. 2 Beginning July 1070. '' Died March 1971. VI © 2003 The Rockefeller Foundation PRINCIPAL OFFICERS AND COUNSEL April 1970—April 1971 PRINCIPAL OFFICERS JOHN D. -
Nineteenth International Conference on Learning at the Institute of Learning in London
NINETEENTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON LEARNING UNIVERSITY OF LONDON INSTITUTE OF EDUCATION LONDON, UNITED KINGDOM 14-16 AUGUST 2012 http://TheLearner.com TABLE OF CONTENTS THE LEARNER........................................................................................................................................ 3 LETTER FROM CONFERENCE HOST ............................................................................................................. 4 ABOUT COMMON GROUND ........................................................................................................................... 5 THE LEARNER KNOWLEDGE COMMUNITY .................................................................................................. 5 ABOUT THE CONFERENCE ............................................................................................................................ 6 SCOPE AND CONCERNS ............................................................................................................................ 6 SESSION DESCRIPTIONS ..........................................................................................................................10 SESSION GUIDELINES ...............................................................................................................................10 SESSION TYPES ........................................................................................................................................10 THEMES ......................................................................................................................................................11