DOCSLIB.ORG

Active Ice Moon

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Active Ice Moon 11.2.2007 (Revision 1, Edited for Public Release) Saturn’s Active ENCELADUS Ice Moon Preface Upon the recommendation of the NASA Advisory Council Planetary Science Subcommittee and the Outer Planets Assessment Group (OPAG), NASA Headquarters (HQ) Planetary Science Divi- sion commissioned pre-Phase A studies of Flagship missions to Europa, Ganymede/Jupiter system, Enceladus, and Titan. The purpose of these studies is to inform near term strategic decisions for the next Flagship mission. NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC) was directed to conduct the Enceladus study. NASA HQ appointed an Enceladus Science Definition Team (SDT) consisting of members drawn from the science community. The Enceladus SDT developed the science objectives, prioritized sub- objectives, defined an example strawman payload, and worked with the mission design team to create the mission scenarios, concept of operations and instrument accommodation requirements. The SDT based science priorities on those recommended in the 2003 Decadal Survey for planetary science and on work performed by previous science teams in support of the JPL-led study documented in Titan and Enceladus $1B Mission Feasibility Report, JPL D-37401 (Reh et al. 2007). (The two SDT Co-Chairs provided a consolidated view of the SDT’s advice as input for this study.) The NASA GSFC assembled a mission design team (listed in Section 5) to develop mission ar- chitecture concepts to address the science goals identified by the SDT. A Champion Team (listed in Section 5), whose members have expertise in the keys areas required for this study, provided advice to the mission design team at critical decision points, and reviewed and endorsed this report. Relative to the initial edition of the report released 29 August 2007, this Revision 1 edition contains changes that permit the report to be released to the public. It also includes editorial corrections along with a few minor technical corrections which materially affect neither the results nor the recommenda- tions. ENCELADUS Table of Contents 1.0 Executive Summary . 1-1 1.1 Overview . .1-1 1.2 Enceladus Science . 1-1 1.2.1 Science Goals . 1-1 1.2.2 Measurement Requirements . .1-2 1.2.3 Instrument Types . 1-2 1.3 Mission Architecture Assessment . 1-2 1.3.1 Key Challenges to Studying Enceladus . 1-2 1.3.2 Technical Approach . 1-3 1.3.3 Architecture Trade Space . 1-3 1.3.4 Trade Space Concept Designs . .1-3 1.3.5 Remaining Architectures in Trade Space . .1-3 1.4 Cost . 1-3 1.5 Conclusions and Findings . 1-7 2.0 Enceladus Science Goals and Objectives . 2-1 2.1 Science Goals . 2-1 2.1.1 Introduction: The Importance of Enceladus . 2-1 2.1.2 Priority 1 Goals . 2-2 2.1.2.1 Biological Potential . 2-2 2.1.3 Priority 2 Goals . 2-4 2.1.3.1 Composition . .2-4 2.1.3.2 Cryovolcanism . .2-6 2.1.3.3 Tectonics . 2-7 2.1.3.4 Tidal Heating and Interior Structure . 2-8 2.1.4 Priority 3 Goals . 2-11 2.1.4.1 Saturn System Interaction . 2-11 2.1.4.2 Surface Processes . 2-12 2.1.5 Relationship to NASA Strategic Goals and Decadal Survey Goals . 2-14 2.1.5.1 The First Billion Years of Solar System History . 2-14 2.1.5.2 Volatiles and Organics: The Stuff of Life . 2-14 2.1.5.3 The Origin and Evolution of Habitable Worlds . 2-14 2.1.5.4 Processes: How Planetary Systems Work . 2-15 2.1.5.5 Relevance to Decadal Survey Large Satellites Sub-Panel Themes . 2-15 2.2 Measurement Requirements Overview . 2-17 2.2.1 Traceability Matrix . 2-17 2.2.2 Cassini’s Ability to Make These Measurements . 2-17 2.3 Instrument Types . 2-20 2.3.1 Orbiter Remote Sensing Instruments . 2-21 2.3.1.1 Thermal Mapper (Category 1) . 2-21 2.3.1.2 Near-IR Mapper (Category 1) . 2-21 2.3.1.3 Visible Mapper (Category 1) . 2-22 2.3.1.4 Framing Camera (Category 2) . 2-22 2.3.1.5 UV Spectrometer (Category 2) . 2-22 iii ENCELADUS 2.3.2 Orbiter Geophysics Instruments . 2-23 2.3.2.1 Laser Altimeter (Category 1) . 2-23 2.3.2.2 Radio Science (Category 1) . 2-23 2.3.2.3 Magnetometer (Category 1) . 2-24 2.3.2.4 Radar Sounder (Category 1 or 2) . 2-24 2.3.3 Saturn Orbiter In-Situ Instruments . 2-25 2.3.3.1 Ion and Neutral Gas Mass Spectrometer (Category 1) . 2-25 2.3.3.2 Dust Analyzer (Category 1) . 2-25 2.3.3.3 Low Energy Plasma Analyzer (Category 2) . 2-26 2.3.3.4 Energetic Particle Spectrometer (Category 2) . 2-26 2.3.4 Enceladus Orbiter In-Situ Instruments . 2-27 2.3.4.1 Gas Chromatograph Mass Spectrometer (Category 1) . 2-27 2.3.4.2 Dust Micro-Analyzer (Category 1) . 2-27 2.3.5 Enceladus Soft Lander Instruments . 2-28 2.3.5.1 Lander Camera (Category 1) . 2-28 2.3.5.2 Seismometer (Category 1) . 2-28 2.3.5.3 Radio Science (Category 1) . 2-29 2.3.5.4 Surface Chemistry Package and Oxidant Detector (Category 1) . 2-29 2.3.5.5 Laser Desorption Mass Spectrometer (Category 1) . 2-29 2.3.5.6 Magnetometer (Category 2) . 2-30 2.3.5.7 Tunable Laser Spectrometer (Category 2) . 2-30 2.3.6 Hard Lander Instruments (Category 2) . 2-31 2.3.7 Matrices Relating Instruments to Science Goals . 2-31 2.4 Science Evaluation of Architecture Trade Space . 2-31 2.4.1 Mission Configurations Not Chosen for Detailed Study . 2-31 2.4.1.1 Sample Return . 2-31 2.4.1.2 Dumb Impactors . 2-34 2.4.1.3 Saturn Orbiter Only (no landers) . 2-34 2.4.1.4 Single Flyby Missions . 2-35 2.4.1.5 Lander-Only Missions . 2-35 2.4.6 Missions Chosen for Detailed Study . 2-35 2.5 Plume Particle Sizes and Abundances: Potential Hazards and Sampling Opportunities . 2-35 2.6 References . 2-38 3.0 Mission Architecture Assessment. 3-1 3.1 Technical Approach . 3-1 3.1.1 Risk Reduction / Fact Finding Activities . 3-1 3.1.1.1 Key Challenges to Studying Enceladus . 3-1 3.1.1.2 Trajectory Work . 3-2 3.1.1.2.1 Gravity Assists to Saturn . 3-2 3.1.1.2.1.1 SEP Trajectories . 3-2 3.1.1.2.1.2 Chemical Propulsion Trajectories . 3-2 3.1.1.2.2 Saturn Orbit Insertion and Gravity Assists within the Saturn System . 3-3 3.1.1.2.3 Free Return Trajectories . 3-5 3.1.1.3 Aerocapture . ..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Arxiv:1912.09192V2 [Astro-Ph.EP] 24 Feb 2020
    Draft version February 25, 2020 Typeset using LATEX preprint style in AASTeX62 Photometric analyses of Saturn's small moons: Aegaeon, Methone and Pallene are dark; Helene and Calypso are bright. M. M. Hedman,1 P. Helfenstein,2 R. O. Chancia,1, 3 P. Thomas,2 E. Roussos,4 C. Paranicas,5 and A. J. Verbiscer6 1Department of Physics, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID 83844 2Cornell Center for Astrophysics and Planetary Science, Cornell University, Ithaca NY 14853 3Center for Imaging Science, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester NY 14623 4Max Planck Institute for Solar System Research, G¨ottingen,Germany 37077 5APL, John Hopkins University, Laurel MD 20723 6Department of Astronomy, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22904 ABSTRACT We examine the surface brightnesses of Saturn's smaller satellites using a photometric model that explicitly accounts for their elongated shapes and thus facilitates compar- isons among different moons. Analyses of Cassini imaging data with this model reveals that the moons Aegaeon, Methone and Pallene are darker than one would expect given trends previously observed among the nearby mid-sized satellites. On the other hand, the trojan moons Calypso and Helene have substantially brighter surfaces than their co-orbital companions Tethys and Dione. These observations are inconsistent with the moons' surface brightnesses being entirely controlled by the local flux of E-ring par- ticles, and therefore strongly imply that other phenomena are affecting their surface properties. The darkness of Aegaeon, Methone and Pallene is correlated with the fluxes of high-energy protons, implying that high-energy radiation is responsible for darkening these small moons. Meanwhile, Prometheus and Pandora appear to be brightened by their interactions with nearby dusty F ring, implying that enhanced dust fluxes are most likely responsible for Calypso's and Helene's excess brightness.
    [Show full text]
  • LUNAR INTERACTIONS ABSTRACTS of PAPERS PRESENTED at the CONFERENCE on INTERACTIONS of the INTERPLANETARY PLASMA with the MODERN and ANCIENT MOON
    LUNAR INTERACTIONS ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS PRESENTED AT THE CONFERENCE ON INTERACTIONS OF THE INTERPLANETARY PLASMA with the MODERN AND ANCIENT MOON ORGANIZED BY THE I. N 3 LUNAR SCIENCE INSTITUTE m I 3 AND THE I- 2 SPACE PHYSICS DEPARTMENT RICE UNIVERSITY sponsored by the NATIONAL AERONAUTICS m m AND 0 .. I-( OIW mrl SPACE ADMINISTRATION ZX CV OH IOI H WclU AND THE uux- V&H 0 NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION g,,,, wm. WWO@W u u ? ZZLOX€e HW5H vlOHU ffiMHrnfC 4 ffi H 2.~4~4a Edited by 3 dz ,.aV)ffiuJO ffiwcstn WPt.4" DAVID R. CRISWELL ,!a !a Pl r 4 W Pa4 %- rn ZW. and Or=4OcC+J fO Hi4 r WWF I rnU2.M ffiBZ* JOHN W. FREEMAN UUW4aJ I amor 0 alffiwffi E REPRODUCTION RESTRICTIONS OVERRIDDEN 2Z~OZ E 2 2 .: u Bmscientific ma Technical Information FaciLitX -eu $4 to) Copyright O 1974 by the Lunar Science Institute Conference held at George Williams College Lake Geneva Campus Williams Bay, Wisconsin 30 September - 4 October 1974 Compiled by and available from The Lunar Science Institute 3303 Nasa Road 1 Houston, Texas 77058 PREFACE The field of lunar science has essentially completed a period of exponential growth promoted by the national efforts of the 1960's to land on the moon. As normally happens in a diverse scientific community, the interpretations of specialized lunar data have reflected the precepts in the various specialized fields. Constant promotion of the broadest overviews between these diverse fields is appropriate to identify processes or phenomenon recog- nized in one avenue of investigation which may have great importance in explaining the data of other specialities.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Masers in the Saturnian System
    A&A 494, L1–L4 (2009) Astronomy DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:200811186 & c ESO 2009 Astrophysics Letter to the Editor Water masers in the Saturnian system S. V. Pogrebenko1,L.I.Gurvits1, M. Elitzur2,C.B.Cosmovici3,I.M.Avruch1,4, S. Montebugnoli5 , E. Salerno5, S. Pluchino3,5, G. Maccaferri5, A. Mujunen6, J. Ritakari6, J. Wagner6,G.Molera6, and M. Uunila6 1 Joint Institute for VLBI in Europe, PO Box 2, 7990 AA Dwingeloo, The Netherlands e-mail: [pogrebenko;lgurvits]@jive.nl 2 Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Kentucky, 600 Rose Street, Lexington, KY 40506-0055, USA e-mail: [email protected] 3 Istituto Nazionale di Astrofisica (INAF) – Istituto di Fisica dello Spazio Interplanetario (IFSI), via del Fosso del Cavaliere, 00133 Rome, Italy e-mail: [email protected] 4 Science & Technology BV, PO 608 2600 AP Delft, The Netherlands e-mail: [email protected] 5 Istituto Nazionale di Astrofisica (INAF) – Istituto di Radioastronomia (IRA) – Stazione Radioastronomica di Medicina, via Fiorentina 3508/B, 40059 Medicina (BO), Italy e-mail: [s.montebugnoli;e.salerno;g.maccaferri]@ira.inaf.it; [email protected] 6 Helsinki University of Technology TKK, Metsähovi Radio Observatory, 02540 Kylmälä, Finland e-mail: [amn;jr;jwagner;gofrito;minttu]@kurp.hut.fi Received 18 October 2008 / Accepted 4 December 2008 ABSTRACT Context. The presence of water has long been seen as a key condition for life in planetary environments. The Cassini spacecraft discovered water vapour in the Saturnian system by detecting absorption of UV emission from a background star. Investigating other possible manifestations of water is essential, one of which, provided physical conditions are suitable, is maser emission.
    [Show full text]
  • Astrodynamics
    Politecnico di Torino SEEDS SpacE Exploration and Development Systems Astrodynamics II Edition 2006 - 07 - Ver. 2.0.1 Author: Guido Colasurdo Dipartimento di Energetica Teacher: Giulio Avanzini Dipartimento di Ingegneria Aeronautica e Spaziale e-mail: [email protected] Contents 1 Two–Body Orbital Mechanics 1 1.1 BirthofAstrodynamics: Kepler’sLaws. ......... 1 1.2 Newton’sLawsofMotion ............................ ... 2 1.3 Newton’s Law of Universal Gravitation . ......... 3 1.4 The n–BodyProblem ................................. 4 1.5 Equation of Motion in the Two-Body Problem . ....... 5 1.6 PotentialEnergy ................................. ... 6 1.7 ConstantsoftheMotion . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .... 7 1.8 TrajectoryEquation .............................. .... 8 1.9 ConicSections ................................... 8 1.10 Relating Energy and Semi-major Axis . ........ 9 2 Two-Dimensional Analysis of Motion 11 2.1 ReferenceFrames................................. 11 2.2 Velocity and acceleration components . ......... 12 2.3 First-Order Scalar Equations of Motion . ......... 12 2.4 PerifocalReferenceFrame . ...... 13 2.5 FlightPathAngle ................................. 14 2.6 EllipticalOrbits................................ ..... 15 2.6.1 Geometry of an Elliptical Orbit . ..... 15 2.6.2 Period of an Elliptical Orbit . ..... 16 2.7 Time–of–Flight on the Elliptical Orbit . .......... 16 2.8 Extensiontohyperbolaandparabola. ........ 18 2.9 Circular and Escape Velocity, Hyperbolic Excess Speed . .............. 18 2.10 CosmicVelocities
    [Show full text]
  • Using Earth Observation Data to Improve Health in the United States Accomplishments and Future Challenges
    a report of the csis technology and public policy program Using Earth Observation Data to Improve Health in the United States accomplishments and future challenges 1800 K Street, NW | Washington, DC 20006 Tel: (202) 887-0200 | Fax: (202) 775-3199 Author E-mail: [email protected] | Web: www.csis.org Lyn D. Wigbels September 2011 ISBN 978-0-89206-668-1 Ë|xHSKITCy066681zv*:+:!:+:! a report of the csis technology and public policy program Using Earth Observation Data to Improve Health in the United States accomplishments and future challenges Author Lyn D. Wigbels September 2011 About CSIS At a time of new global opportunities and challenges, the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) provides strategic insights and bipartisan policy solutions to decisionmakers in government, international institutions, the private sector, and civil society. A bipartisan, nonprofit organization headquartered in Washington, D.C., CSIS conducts research and analysis and devel- ops policy initiatives that look into the future and anticipate change. Founded by David M. Abshire and Admiral Arleigh Burke at the height of the Cold War, CSIS was dedicated to finding ways for America to sustain its prominence and prosperity as a force for good in the world. Since 1962, CSIS has grown to become one of the world’s preeminent international policy institutions, with more than 220 full-time staff and a large network of affiliated scholars focused on defense and security, regional stability, and transnational challenges ranging from energy and climate to global development and economic integration. Former U.S. senator Sam Nunn became chairman of the CSIS Board of Trustees in 1999, and John J.
    [Show full text]
  • A Hot Subdwarf-White Dwarf Super-Chandrasekhar Candidate
    A hot subdwarf–white dwarf super-Chandrasekhar candidate supernova Ia progenitor Ingrid Pelisoli1,2*, P. Neunteufel3, S. Geier1, T. Kupfer4,5, U. Heber6, A. Irrgang6, D. Schneider6, A. Bastian1, J. van Roestel7, V. Schaffenroth1, and B. N. Barlow8 1Institut fur¨ Physik und Astronomie, Universitat¨ Potsdam, Haus 28, Karl-Liebknecht-Str. 24/25, D-14476 Potsdam-Golm, Germany 2Department of Physics, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK 3Max Planck Institut fur¨ Astrophysik, Karl-Schwarzschild-Straße 1, 85748 Garching bei Munchen¨ 4Kavli Institute for Theoretical Physics, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA 5Texas Tech University, Department of Physics & Astronomy, Box 41051, 79409, Lubbock, TX, USA 6Dr. Karl Remeis-Observatory & ECAP, Astronomical Institute, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU), Sternwartstr. 7, 96049 Bamberg, Germany 7Division of Physics, Mathematics and Astronomy, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA 8Department of Physics and Astronomy, High Point University, High Point, NC 27268, USA *[email protected] ABSTRACT Supernova Ia are bright explosive events that can be used to estimate cosmological distances, allowing us to study the expansion of the Universe. They are understood to result from a thermonuclear detonation in a white dwarf that formed from the exhausted core of a star more massive than the Sun. However, the possible progenitor channels leading to an explosion are a long-standing debate, limiting the precision and accuracy of supernova Ia as distance indicators. Here we present HD 265435, a binary system with an orbital period of less than a hundred minutes, consisting of a white dwarf and a hot subdwarf — a stripped core-helium burning star.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:2012.15102V2 [Hep-Ph] 13 May 2021 T > Tc
    Confinement of Fermions in Tachyon Matter at Finite Temperature Adamu Issifu,1, ∗ Julio C.M. Rocha,1, y and Francisco A. Brito1, 2, z 1Departamento de F´ısica, Universidade Federal da Para´ıba, Caixa Postal 5008, 58051-970 Jo~aoPessoa, Para´ıba, Brazil 2Departamento de F´ısica, Universidade Federal de Campina Grande Caixa Postal 10071, 58429-900 Campina Grande, Para´ıba, Brazil We study a phenomenological model that mimics the characteristics of QCD theory at finite temperature. The model involves fermions coupled with a modified Abelian gauge field in a tachyon matter. It reproduces some important QCD features such as, confinement, deconfinement, chiral symmetry and quark-gluon-plasma (QGP) phase transitions. The study may shed light on both light and heavy quark potentials and their string tensions. Flux-tube and Cornell potentials are developed depending on the regime under consideration. Other confining properties such as scalar glueball mass, gluon mass, glueball-meson mixing states, gluon and chiral condensates are exploited as well. The study is focused on two possible regimes, the ultraviolet (UV) and the infrared (IR) regimes. I. INTRODUCTION Confinement of heavy quark states QQ¯ is an important subject in both theoretical and experimental study of high temperature QCD matter and quark-gluon-plasma phase (QGP) [1]. The production of heavy quarkonia such as the fundamental state ofcc ¯ in the Relativistic Heavy Iron Collider (RHIC) [2] and the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) [3] provides basics for the study of QGP. Lattice QCD simulations of quarkonium at finite temperature indicates that J= may persists even at T = 1:5Tc [4] i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Imagining Outer Space Also by Alexander C
    Imagining Outer Space Also by Alexander C. T. Geppert FLEETING CITIES Imperial Expositions in Fin-de-Siècle Europe Co-Edited EUROPEAN EGO-HISTORIES Historiography and the Self, 1970–2000 ORTE DES OKKULTEN ESPOSIZIONI IN EUROPA TRA OTTO E NOVECENTO Spazi, organizzazione, rappresentazioni ORTSGESPRÄCHE Raum und Kommunikation im 19. und 20. Jahrhundert NEW DANGEROUS LIAISONS Discourses on Europe and Love in the Twentieth Century WUNDER Poetik und Politik des Staunens im 20. Jahrhundert Imagining Outer Space European Astroculture in the Twentieth Century Edited by Alexander C. T. Geppert Emmy Noether Research Group Director Freie Universität Berlin Editorial matter, selection and introduction © Alexander C. T. Geppert 2012 Chapter 6 (by Michael J. Neufeld) © the Smithsonian Institution 2012 All remaining chapters © their respective authors 2012 All rights reserved. No reproduction, copy or transmission of this publication may be made without written permission. No portion of this publication may be reproduced, copied or transmitted save with written permission or in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, or under the terms of any licence permitting limited copying issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency, Saffron House, 6–10 Kirby Street, London EC1N 8TS. Any person who does any unauthorized act in relation to this publication may be liable to criminal prosecution and civil claims for damages. The authors have asserted their rights to be identified as the authors of this work in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. First published 2012 by PALGRAVE MACMILLAN Palgrave Macmillan in the UK is an imprint of Macmillan Publishers Limited, registered in England, company number 785998, of Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire RG21 6XS.
    [Show full text]
  • GST Responses to “Questions to Inform Development of the National Plan”
    GST Responses to “Questions to Inform Development of the National Plan” Name (optional): Dr. Darrel Williams Position (optional): Chief Scientist, (240) 542-1106; [email protected] Institution (optional): Global Science & Technology, Inc. Greenbelt, Maryland 20770 Global Science & Technology, Inc. (GST) is pleased to provide the following answers as a contribution towards OSTP’s effort to develop a national plan for civil Earth observations. In our response we provide information to support three main themes: 1. There is strong science need for high temporal resolution of moderate spatial resolution satellite earth observation that can be achieved with cost effective, innovative new approaches. 2. Operational programs need to be designed to obtain sustained climate data records. Continuity of Earth observations can be achieved through more efficient and economical means. 3. We need programs to address the integration of remotely sensed data with in situ data. GST has carefully considered these important national Earth observation issues over the past few years and has submitted the following RFI responses: The USGS RFI on Landsat Data Continuity Concepts (April 2012), NASA’s Sustainable Land Imaging Architecture RFI (September 2013), and This USGEO RFI (November 2013) relative to OSTP’s efforts to develop a national plan for civil Earth observations. In addition to the above RFI responses, GST led the development of a mature, fully compliant flight mission concept in response to NASA’s Earth Venture-2 RFP in September 2011. Our capacity to address these critical national issues resides in GST’s considerable bench strength in Earth science understanding (Drs. Darrel Williams, DeWayne Cecil, Samuel Goward, and Dixon Butler) and in NASA systems engineering and senior management oversight (Drs.
    [Show full text]
  • CALCEPH - Fortran 77/90/95 Language Release 3.5.0
    CALCEPH - Fortran 77/90/95 language Release 3.5.0 M. Gastineau, J. Laskar, A. Fienga, H. Manche Aug 19, 2021 CONTENTS 1 Introduction 3 2 Installation 5 2.1 Unix-like system (Linux, Mac OS X, BSD, Cygwin, ...)........................5 2.1.1 Quick instructions........................................5 2.1.2 Detailed instructions......................................5 2.2 Windows system.............................................7 2.2.1 Using the Microsoft Visual C++ compiler...........................7 2.2.2 Using the MinGW.......................................9 3 Library interface 11 3.1 A simple example program........................................ 11 3.2 Headers and Libraries.......................................... 11 3.2.1 Compilation on a Unix-like system............................... 12 3.2.2 Compilation on a Windows system............................... 12 3.3 Types................................................... 12 3.4 Constants................................................. 12 4 Multiple file access functions 15 4.1 Thread notes............................................... 15 4.2 Usage................................................... 15 4.3 Functions................................................. 15 4.3.1 calceph_open.......................................... 15 4.3.2 f90calceph_open_array..................................... 16 4.3.3 f90calceph_prefetch....................................... 17 4.3.4 f90calceph_isthreadsafe..................................... 17 4.3.5 f90calceph_compute.....................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Minor Planet Bulletin 44 (2017) 142
    THE MINOR PLANET BULLETIN OF THE MINOR PLANETS SECTION OF THE BULLETIN ASSOCIATION OF LUNAR AND PLANETARY OBSERVERS VOLUME 44, NUMBER 2, A.D. 2017 APRIL-JUNE 87. 319 LEONA AND 341 CALIFORNIA – Lightcurves from all sessions are then composited with no TWO VERY SLOWLY ROTATING ASTEROIDS adjustment of instrumental magnitudes. A search should be made for possible tumbling behavior. This is revealed whenever Frederick Pilcher successive rotational cycles show significant variation, and Organ Mesa Observatory (G50) quantified with simultaneous 2 period software. In addition, it is 4438 Organ Mesa Loop useful to obtain a small number of all-night sessions for each Las Cruces, NM 88011 USA object near opposition to look for possible small amplitude short [email protected] period variations. Lorenzo Franco Observations to obtain the data used in this paper were made at the Balzaretto Observatory (A81) Organ Mesa Observatory with a 0.35-meter Meade LX200 GPS Rome, ITALY Schmidt-Cassegrain (SCT) and SBIG STL-1001E CCD. Exposures were 60 seconds, unguided, with a clear filter. All Petr Pravec measurements were calibrated from CMC15 r’ values to Cousins Astronomical Institute R magnitudes for solar colored field stars. Photometric Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic measurement is with MPO Canopus software. To reduce the Fricova 1, CZ-25165 number of points on the lightcurves and make them easier to read, Ondrejov, CZECH REPUBLIC data points on all lightcurves constructed with MPO Canopus software have been binned in sets of 3 with a maximum time (Received: 2016 Dec 20) difference of 5 minutes between points in each bin.
    [Show full text]
  • 7 X 11 Long.P65
    Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-85349-1 - Meteor Showers and their Parent Comets Peter Jenniskens Index More information Index a – semimajor axis 58 twin shower 440 A – albedo 111, 586 fragmentation index 444 A1 – radial nongravitational force 15 meteoroid density 444 A2 – transverse, in plane, nongravitational force 15 potential parent bodies 448–453 A3 – transverse, out of plane, nongravitational a-Centaurids 347–348 force 15 1980 outburst 348 A2 – effect 239 a-Circinids (1977) 198 ablation 595 predictions 617 ablation coefficient 595 a-Lyncids (1971) 198 carbonaceous chondrite 521 predictions 617 cometary matter 521 a-Monocerotids 183 ordinary chondrite 521 1925 outburst 183 absolute magnitude 592 1935 outburst 183 accretion 86 1985 outburst 183 hierarchical 86 1995 peak rate 188 activity comets, decrease with distance from Sun 1995 activity profile 188 Halley-type comets 100 activity 186 Jupiter-family comets 100 w 186 activity curve meteor shower 236, 567 dust trail width 188 air density at meteor layer 43 lack of sodium 190 airborne astronomy 161 meteoroid density 190 1899 Leonids 161 orbital period 188 1933 Leonids 162 predictions 617 1946 Draconids 165 upper mass cut-off 188 1972 Draconids 167 a-Pyxidids (1979) 199 1976 Quadrantids 167 predictions 617 1998 Leonids 221–227 a-Scorpiids 511 1999 Leonids 233–236 a-Virginids 503 2000 Leonids 240 particle density 503 2001 Leonids 244 amorphous water ice 22 2002 Leonids 248 Andromedids 153–155, 380–384 airglow 45 1872 storm 380–384 albedo (A) 16, 586 1885 storm 380–384 comet 16 1899
    [Show full text]