<<

Plant Physiol. (1979) 63, 518-523 0032-0889/79/63/0518/06/$00.50/0

Proline Accumulation in Water-stressed Barley Leaves in Relation to Translocation and the Nitrogen Budget' Received for publication September 25, 1978 and in revised form November 3, 1978

RAYMOND E. TULLY, ANDREw D. HANSON, AND CHARLES E. NELSEN MSU-DOE Research Laboratory, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824

ABSTRACT some of the synthesized in the leaves is translocated to the roots. Their data did not consider proline accumulation in leaves Mobilization of N from leaves of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) during in the more general context of the over-all N status of stressed water stress, and the role of proline as a mobilized species, were examined , and do not allow estimates of the relative rates of proline in plants at the three-leaf stage. The plants responded to water stress by export and accumulation during stress. withdrawing about 25% of the total reduced N from the leaf blades via In this paper we report on the mobilization of N from water- phloem translocation. Most of this N loss was during the first 2 days while stressed barley leaves in relation to free proline accumulation, and translocation of 'C-photosynthate out of the stressed blade still remained assess the possible contribution of proline to N translocation active. Free proline accumulation in the blade was initially slow, and during stress. We used two barley cultivars: Proctor, a drought- became more rapid during the 2nd day of stress. Although a major free sensitive two-row cultivar; and Excelsior, a more drought-resistant , proline accounted for only about 5% of the total N (soluble + six-row type. The effect ofwater stress on proline accumulation in insoluble) retained in severely stressed blades. When the translocation these two cultivars has been described in detail (7). pathway in water-stressed leaves was interrupted just below the blade by a heat girdle, a cold jacket, or by blade excision, N loss from the blade was prevented and proline began to accumulate rapidly on 1st day of stress. MATERIALS AND METHODS Little free proline accumulated in the blades until after the ability to Plant Material and Growth Conditions. Seeds of Proctor translocate was lost. Proline was, however, probably not a major species of CI11806 and Excelsior CI11509 barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) were N translocated during stress, because proline N accumulation in heat- obtained from the USDA small grains collection, Beltsville, Md., girdled stressed leaves was five times slower than the rate of total N export and were multiplied in spring field plots at Michigan State Uni- from intact blades. versity. A sample of Proctor seeds (company reference no. 2174) was also provided by RHM Agriculture, High Wycombe, U.K. Plants were grown in Perlite in plastic pots (7 x 12 cm) for 17 to 19 days after sowing (to the three-leaf stage) in a growth chamber under a regime of 16-h days, day/night temperature 22/ 16 C, day/night RH 70/85%, total irradiance 3.8 mw cm-2 (80%o The onset of water deficit alters the over-all N budget of crops from fluorescent lamps, 20o from incandescent lamps), and were through effects on both N transport and N assimilation. Nitrate watered on alternate days with half-strength Hoagland solution. delivery via the xylem to the shoot is depressed (17), and N03 Prior to the experiments, the plants were thinned to four per pot. reduction in the leaves declines (12, 17). Although phloem trans- Water Stress and Leaf Water Potential. Plants were osmotically port of assimilated N to N sinks is eventually reduced (4, 25), it is stressed with PEG solutions as previously described (7). Pots were probable that phloem transport is sufficiently resistant to water flooded with three successive 100-ml doses of a -19 bar PEG stress to permit appreciable salvage of both N and carbon from (Union Carbide) solution (400 g PEG 6000 plus 1,000 ml half- wilted leaves that are dying as a consequence of desiccation (3, 6, strength Hoagland) on the 1st day of stress, and with additional 25). 100-ml doses on subsequent days. Within the leaves of many plants subjected to moderate or Leaf samples for *.eaf measurement2 were 13-mm lengths sliced severe water stress, one striking change in N is the with a sharp razor from the midpoint of the second leaf blades. A accumulation of free proline as a result of net de novo synthesis Wescor model HR-33[T] dew point microvoltmeter equipped with from (e.g. 1, 2). It has been proposed that this model C-52 sample chambers was used to estimate *leaf, as accumulation is a metabolic adaptation which confers survival described by Nelsen et al. (14), using a 2-h equilibration period. value, perhaps acting as a (phloem-mobile) reserve ofN accessible Dry Weight, Kjeldahl N, and Nitrate N. Plants were divided for use upon stress relief (e.g. 1, 18, 21). This possibility cannot be into second leaf blades, first and third leaf blades, leaf sheaths evaluated without knowing: (a) how much N is exported from with enclosed shoot apex and expanding leaves (referred to as stressed leaves to other parts of the plant; and (b) whether proline "culm" in the text), and roots. These parts were frozen in liquid accumulation and export are significant terms in the total N N2, dried overnight at 60 C, and weighed. Kjeldahl N was deter- budget of a leaf during stress. Much of the published work on mined by the nonreductive technique described by Steyermark proline accumulation during water stress has been with detached (22), using a digestion mix of 1.3 g K2SO4, 32 mg HgO, and 2 ml leaves, which clearly cannot export N. Proline accumulation has H2SO4 per sample. After boiling for 4 h, the digests were brought also been investigated in intact plants. In only one study was the to 100 ml with H20. A 200- or 500-,ul aliquot ofeach diluted digest question oftranslocation addressed: Singh et aL (19, 20) suggested, was brought to 3.0 ml with 0.2 N NaOH; 100 yil of Nessler's on the basis ofsurgical experiments, that in wilted barley seedlings reagent was added, and the A420 was measured after 10 min. The ' Research carried out under Contract EY-76-C-02-1338 from the United States Department of Energy. Michigan Agricultural Experiment 2Abbreviations: .leaf leaf water potential; MCW: methanol-chloro- Station Journal Article No. 8656. form-water. 518 Plant Physiol. Vol. 63, 1979 PROLINE, TRANSLOCATION, AND WATER STRESS 519 assay was calibrated with NH4Cl, , and a standardized close contact with a length of brass tubing (6.5 x 0.7 cm) through preparation of wheat seed . which refrigerated water was passed. The temperature ofthe culms Even though a specific reductive step was not used, it was found as measured with a thermocouple was 6 C. Cooling was begun 5 that some fraction of the endogenous N03- in the tissue samples h after the initial PEG application. was being recovered as NH3 after digestion. To determine the Plants to be used in surgical experiments were first treated with significance of this effect in leaf tissue, samples of dry leaf powder PEG and placed in the illuminated growth chamber for 5 h to were treated with various amounts of KNO3 and digested. The cause wilting. Various organs were separated and kept at constant endogenous N03 level in the untreated leaf sample was deter- water status by placing on moist paper toweling, covering with mined by the method of Lowe and Hamilton (1 1). The results are plastic wrap, and placing in the growth chamber under the stan- shown in Figure 1, along with the curve obtained from digesting dard day/night regime. Excised organs comprised leaf blades, the KNO3 standards alone with a reductive technique (22). Note leaf blades with culm attached, or culm alone. Excised roots and that the curve for leaf digests plus KN03 has a slope of 0.45 that intact plants were kept in the pots. Water status of the excised of the reductive method with KN03 alone, which means that 45% parts remained essentially unchanged during the 24-h treatment of the N03 in a leaf sample was recovered as NH3 in a standard period, as judged by absence of change in fresh weight. digest. The bar in Figure 1 indicates the extreme range of endog- '4CO2 Fixation and Translocation. Gaseous '4C02 was gener- enous N03 concentrations encountered in this study. A trend was ated by mixing 2 ,ul of Na2'4CO3 solution (4 ,uCi, 60 mCi/mmol, found toward a slight increase in N03 as stress continued (Table Amersham) with a drop of 50%o lactic acid in a 5-ml syringe barrel I), which would tend to increase the recovery of NH3 from the with the plunger at the 4-ml mark. One ml (1 ,uCi) of the 14CO2 digests. Because the effect is small compared to the larger changes was injected into each of four leaf-feeding chambers. The cham- caused by translocation (see later), no correction was attempted. bers were glass tubes (1.5 x 10.5 cm) with a serum cap at one end Tissue Extraction and Proline and Amino Acid Determinations. and a split stopper at the other. Into each chamber was inserted In some experiments, tissue was extracted by the simplified MCW the end 10 cm of intact second leafblades attached to plants under technique described by Hanson et al. (7). In others, tissue was varying degrees of stress. The "CO2 was administered for 15 mi extracted by placing it in 5.0 ml H20 in sealed tubes and heating with illumination. The leaf ends were then removed from the at 100 C for 30 min. Proline was estimated by the acid chambers, and the plants were returned to the illuminated growth method of Troll and Lindsley (23), using instead of chamber. Whole plants were harvested 5 h after label application for the color extraction (7) and omitting the Permutit and divided into the 10-cm fed tips, and all other organs combined. treatment. Amino acids were estimated with ninhydrin according The parts were frozen in liquid N2, dried at 60 C, and combusted to Rosen (16), using a glycine standard. in a Packard model 306 Tri-Carb sample oxidizer. The amount Ammonia was recovered from extracts by vacuum distillation of 14CO2 fixation was taken as the total 14C recovered from the at 55 C, and amide N by steam distillation at 100 C, as described plant, and translocation activity was assessed from the proportion by Varner et al. (24). The NH4' in the boric acid trap was assayed of 14C that was recovered from the unfed parts of the plant. with Nessler's reagent. Heat-girdling, Cold-jacketing, and Excisions. The sheaths of barley second leaves were heat-girdled by gently separating the RESULTS sheaths from the expanding third and fourth leaves, and directing N Redistribution in Proctor during Stress. The changes in a stream of hot air to a 2-cm zone at the top of the sheaths, just Kjeldahl N of the various organs of intact Proctor barley plants below the ligules. Culms were cold-jacketed by placing them in during 4 days of stress are presented in Figure 2A. The pooled leaf blades (leaves 1-3) lost about 28% (1 mg) of their total N. Total N in the roots remained essentially constant, while the N content of the culms increased slightly. As a net result, each plant as a whole lost 0.86 mg of total N. The loss of N was not through

0.5 the phase, because when a stream of air was passed continu- ously over a similar group of stressed plants and bubbled through Leaf+KNO3 an HC1 trap to collect volatile N compounds, the trap contained

0.4 no detectable N (limit of detection 3 ,ug N/day plant). It is very unlikely that the observed loss of N from the leaf blades was due 0 EndDgf to a digestion artifact caused by a decrease in their N03 content, c\J - NO- Levels since the trend (in a similar experiment) was for the N03 in the 4 second leaf blade to increase slightly during stress (Table I), with the increase being small compared to the change in Kjeldahl N. 34° 0.2 Changes in total Kjeldahl N and various soluble N pools in ,KN0, second leaf blades of Proctor during stress are shown in Figure Reductive 2B. Although there was a net loss in total N from the second leaf Digest blade of 24% (0.41 mg), the pool of proline N increased signifi- 0.11 cantly. After 4 days of stress, proline N constituted 5.3% of the I/ total N. The a-amino N content (corrected to exclude proline) increased slightly over the stress period, reaching 3.8% of the total 0 4. from 7 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 N at day Amide N in second leaf blades rose slightly Nitrate N per Digest (mg) ,ug at day 0 to 12 ,ug at day 4, whereas NH4' N remained at less than 4,ug throughout the stress period. FIG. 1. Barley leaf powder (23 mg, approximately equal to the dry The Kjeldahl N lost from the leaves was not recovered from the weight of a second leaf blade) was heated with 0 to 0.8 mg KNO3 N and rest of the plant, except for perhaps a slight increase in the culm subjected to standard Kjeldahl digestion (@ -). The endogenous N03 N content of each 23-mg sample was 0.161 mg, so the digests contained (Fig. 2A). The loss of N from the plant presumably occurred as 0.161 to 0.961 mg N03 N. KNO3 alone was digested with a salicylate- secretion from the roots into the potting medium. Liberation of thiosulfate reductive method (O-O). Bar shows extremes ofendogenous amino acids from the roots of drought-stressed barley and several N03 N content encountered in various other second leaf blade samples other plants has already been demonstrated (10). over the course of this study. Each point represents a single digest. Effect of Stress on "CO2 Fixation and Translocation in Proctor. 520 TULLY, HANSON, AND NELSEN Plant Physiol. Vol. 63, 1979 A

6.0

0' E z -4.0 0

y 2.0o culm--,., ---, 01- a- i I Roots

A I a 0 1 2 3 4 0 I 2 3 4 Days of PEG Stress Days of PEG Stress FIG. 2. Kjeldahl N in various organs of Proctor plants (A) and distribution of N among various fractions of Proctor second leaf blades (B) during 4 days of PEG stress. (0 - 0): Unstressed controls. In B, a-amino N does not include proline. Also, note the break and change in scale in B; both proline N and a-amino N contents are very small compared to total N. Free NH3 in the second leafblade remained essentially constant at <4 pLg N over 4 days, and amide N increased from 7 jg at day Oto 12 pig at day 4 (not shown). Kjeldahl N content remained essentially constant after day 4 of stress, declining to 1.19 + 0.05 mg by day 9. Data points for Kjeldahl digests in A and B are means of eight replicates; other points in B are means of four replicates.

Proctor Table I. Nitrate Content of Second 14 Leaf Blades During PEG Stress 0).4 CO2 Fixation Plants at the 3-leaf stage were stressed for 4 days, and second leaf blades were harvested daily for N03 assays. Results are means of 2- C-) 0).2- four replicates. x A 0 Days of mg N03- N/Blade Stress "o-4C Translocation 0 0.21 ?0a' 1 0.21 0c. 2 0.24 00 3 0.25 oo B 4 0.25 Iz 0 LSD, P < 5% 0.06 ~ a'Q ,.0 PPrine

The results of the 14CO2 feeding and translocation experiment 0 with Proctor are shown in Figure 3, along with 'I'if and proline .5 0.5 levels measured in comparable second leaf blades. Relative to o unstressed plants (day 0), 14CO2 fixation was inhibited 46% by day 1 and 88% by day 2 of stress. The proportion of total 14C fixed that was translocated from the fed leaf tip, however, remained 20 VI. essentially unchanged at day 1, but had fallen sharply by day 2. -2 The proline accumulated in the blade during the 1st day of stress .0 was only 0.07 ,umol, but then rose to 4.00 pmol during the next 3 ao0 - Iok D A-D days, subsequent to the inhibition of translocation. 0 1 2 3 4 Effect of Excisions, Cold Jacket, and Heat Girdle. The leaf Days of PEG Stress and roots of stressed Excelsior intact blades, culms, plants kept FIG. 3. Stress inhibition of "4CO2 assimilation and translocation in during the treatment period contained roughly equal amounts of Proctor barley. Individual second leaf blades were offered 1.0 ,uCi of proline (Table II). When these organs were excised from plants 5 "4CO2, as described in the text. Fixation and translocation of label were h after stress initiation and kept isolated for an additional 24 h, assessed 5 h later. A: total 14C in all plant parts after 5 h. B: per cent of the leaves accumulated over five times their usual amount of total "C outside fed area after 5 h. C and D: proline content and *I.1f of proline, while the culms and roots accumulated much less than second leaf blades from a parallel experiment. All data points are means those of stressed intact plants. The culm contained a high level of of four replicates. proline only when attached to the leaf blades, and the roots only when attached to the culm with the leaf blades. Intact unstressed Results of excisions and cold-jacketing performed on Proctor plants and their isolated parts accumulated only very little proline. barley were qualitatively the same as with Excelsior. The effect of a cold jacket was similar to that of leaf excision Figure 4 shows the effect of a heat girdle on proline levels and (Table III). The coldjacket depressed proline accumulation in the 'P1.f of Proctor second leaf blades. Although the *Iid values of culm and roots, and enhanced accumulation in the leaf blades. both stressed-girdled and stressed-ungirdled plants were very Plant Physiol. Vol. 63, 1979 PROLINE, TRANSLOCATION, AND WATER STRESS 521 Table II. Effect of Various Excisions on Proline Distribution in Excelsior Barley Plants were treated with PEG and allowed to wilt for 5 h after which time excisions were performed. Excised organs were held at constant water status for 24 h and were then assayed for proline. The three excision treatments were: (a) keeping plants intact; (b) separating into three parts; and (c) keeping leaves attached to culms but excising roots. Re- sults are means of four replicates. imoles Proline/Oraan (a) Intact (b) 3 Parts (c) Leaf-Culms LSD, P < 5% leaves 0.54 3.0 2.7 1.59 Stressed culm 0.70 0.21 1.0 0.38 roots 0.41 0.14 0.13 0.13 leaves 0.15 0.27 ------Unstressed culm 0.042 0.035 ------roots 0.060 0.065 ------

Table III. Effect of Cold Jacket on Proline Distribution in Table IV. Effect of Heat Girdle on N Loss from Excelsior Excelsior Barley Second Leaf Blades Plants were treated with PEG and allowed to wilt for 5 Excelsior leaf sheaths were heat girdled at a point h after which time cooling jackets were attached to culms. just below the blade immediately before the plants were Control plants were manipulated similarly, but no coolant PEG-stressed. Second leaf blades were harvested and was circulated. Plants were harvested 24 h later, and or- Kjeldahl N determined after 3 days of stress. Control gans extracted and assayed for proline. Temperature of blades were taken immediately before stress initiation cooled culms was 6 C (thermocouple). Results are means of (day 0). Results are means of eight replicates. four replicates.

umoles Prol ine/Organ Kjeldahl N Dry Weight tleaf Stressed Stressed (mg/blade) (mg/blade) (bars) Uncooled Cooled Day 0 Leaves 0.65 2.17* Control 1.28 24.4 -2.2 Culm 1.18 0.57* Day 3 Roots 0.78 0.47* Girdled 1.24 33.4 -12.5 Total 2.61 3.21 n.s. Day 3 Ungirdled 0.97 23.4 -13.1 P < 5% n.s. not significant LSD, P < 5% 0.19 3.7 1.0

had lost about 24% (0.31 mg) of their total N after 3 days of stress, whereas the girdled leaves lost none (Table IV). The dry weight 0L gain in the girdled leaves resulted presumably from the accumu- 0 lation of photosynthate produced in the early part of the stress treatment, while CO2 assimilation was still appreciable (Fig. 3A). 0

0 DISCUSSION a- Most ofthe experiments described in this paper were conducted cn using both Proctor and Excelsior barley, with generally similar 0 E results. There were no differences in response that could not be ascribed to the faster decline of *i'f in Proctor, which has been reported previously (7). Nitrogen Mobilization from Stressed Leaves. There was a sig- nificant remobilization of N from the leaf blades during stress (Fig. 2A), although far less of the N was salvaged from stressed v) leaf blades than from those senescing normally (e.g. 5). This loss of N was presumably through the phloem, because: (a) N losses .0 through volatilization were ruled out; and (b) heat-girdled second leaf blades did not exhibit a stress-induced N loss (Table IV). Little proline accumulated in the second leaf until after trans- location of N out of the leaf had greatly slowed, ie. after day 2 (Fig. 2B). Further, proline began to accumulate immediately after Days of PEG Stress heat-grdling (Fig. 4). This correlation between the cessation of FIG. 4. Effect of heat girdle on proline accumulation (A) and 'l'if (B) transloation and the start ofrapid proline accumulation is further in Proctor second leaf blades. Second leaf sheaths were heat-girdled demonstrated in Figure 3, where translocation was assessed as immediately before PEG application (@-), and compared with plants movement of recent "4C-photosynthate. Rapid proline accumula- that were stressed but not girdled (O-O). Each point is mean of three tion did not begin until translocation had markedly declined. replicates. Using the data from the second leaf blade of Proctor (Fig. 2, Table IV, and ref. 7), a simplified comparison can be made of the close, the girdled leaves accumulated proline at a faster rate than N budgets of stressed and unstressed blades. This is shown sche- the ungirdled leaves. Heat-girdling unstressed leaves caused a matically in Figure 5. decrease in their l,.a over 2 days, and resulted in a moderate In unstressed plants 17 to 19 days old, the second leaf blades accumulation of proline (not shown). (Fig. 5A) were essentially in N balance insofar as no changes took Measurements of total Kjeldahl N on girdled and ungirdled place in their contents of N03 , NH4', Kjeldahl N, a-amino N, second leaves of Excelsior plants showed that ungirdled leaves amide N, and proline N. The fluxes of N03 into the second leaf 522 TULLY, HANSON, AND NELSEN Plant Physiol. Vol. 63, 1979 total reduced N, a-NH2 N, or proline N. A Free a-Amino Ikistessed N Proline Accumulation and Export from Stressed Leaves. The No; i< NHN 4 Reduced N data of Table II extend the observations of Singh et al. (19) on N_ ap- Pol <41ugN , - 203,ug /day proline accumulation in excised parts of barley seedlings; it N/ Day N | Ammle N pears that proline, or a proline precursor, originates in the leaf 203Mu 2101ug blades during stress and is transported to the sheaths and roots. Proline 7Ng This is supported by the results of the cold-jacketing and heat- Kjeldahl N 1.680pg 0.31jg girdling treatments (Table III and Fig. 4). Cold-jacketing slowed or inhibited translocation through the phloem in the sheaths, so Free oL- Amino that leaf blades accumulated more proline than usual and the B N Stressed Day culms and roots less, with little change per whole plant. Likewise, NO3 -1-I6-NH+ 4 Reduced N heat-girdling the sheath of the second leaf caused proline to Pools 30 bars). Units are,ug N. Heavy solid arrows If proline is exported from the blades as part of the N remobil- indicate probable major paths of N flow, and light broken arrows indicate ization process, an estimate of the rate of proline export can be flows that are probably small. Light solid arrows designate flows of made by assuming that its rate of removal from leaves during the uncertain size. Double bars on arrows show processes known to be first 2 days of stress is equal to the increased rate of proline inhibited during water stress. Areas of the square pools of N03- N, free accumulation caused by heat-girdling (Fig. 4). In this case, the a-amino N, and free proline N are proportional to their N contents. Values rate of proline export = (6.0 - 1.2)/2- = 2.4 umol/day, or 34 ,g for a-amino N exclude proline N. Large boxes containing the various N/day. Since this is only 13% of the rate of N loss from the second pools represent second leaf blades, which import N03- from the xylem at to the left, and export reduced N via the phloem at the right. blade at this time (= 260 ,ug N/day, Fig. 5B), proline appears be only a relatively minor component of the N translocated from stressed leaves, despite the sharp rise in its contribution to the free blade and of reduced N out must therefore have been equal, and amino acid pool as severe stress develops. Our results leave open can be estimated by assuming: (a) that the increase of total N in the question of the forms in which N is moved from stressed whole unstressed plants (810 jig, Fig. 2A) was the result of N03 leaves, and whether these are different from those exported from reduction occurring in the leaf blades, and in no other parts of the unstressed leaves in N balance. plant (5, 13); and (b) that the second leaf blade, which accounted Survival Value of Proline Accumulation during Water Stress. for about one-half of the total dry weight (and one-third of the Proline is neither of major importance as a reserve of N after area) of all three leaf blades was responsible for one-half of the stress, nor is it a major translocated N species during stress. These N03 reduction. An additional assumption is that protein turnover conclusions alone cast doubt on (a) the possibility that proline is relatively slow, which is true for the soluble of the accumulation confers significant survival value during water stress; second leaves of wheat (9), and for the ribulose-l,S-diP carboxyl- and (b) attempts to use proline accumulation as a positive index (15). The flux is estimated to be 203 ,ug N ase of barley seedlings of drought resistance (e.g. 18). per day (Fig. SA). The results on proline translocation lead to another conclusion. After I day of stress (Fig. SB), the second leaf blades were at tips. Nitrate delivery and A high rate of proline accumulation could arise either from a high wilted, but were not yet killed their rate of synthesis or a low rate of export. If, within a range of crop reduction must have ceased, because no accumulation of N03 with plants accumulated no genotypes, a high rate of proline accumulation is associated had occurred (Table I), and heat-girdled an early and fast loss of the capacity to translocate N (and reduced N during stress (Table IV). The sensitivity to water stress presumably carbon) from drought-stressed leaves, rapid proline of both N03 delivery to, and reduction in, the leaf is well accumulation would seem more likely to be symptomatic of a documented (12, 17). Between days 1 and 2 of stress, some 260 deleterious response to water stress than to be an adaptive feature ,tg of N were withdrawn from the blades (Fig. 2B and Table IV), a to unstressed with survival value. We have reached a similar conclusion in which is a rate of export comparable that from comparative study of proline accumulation in the contrasting although the source of this N must have been protein blades, barley varieties Proctor and Excelsior, and in the progeny of a breakdown in the former case as opposed to reduction of recently and an Proctor x Excelsior cross (7, 8). imported NO3 in the latter. Net protein breakdown, We therefore caution against the assumption that the capacity inhibition of new protein synthesis, have been frequently noted in water-stressed tissues (e.g. 1). for proline accumulation is positively correlated with drought At 4 days of stress (Fig. 5C), leaf killing had progressed about resistance. halfway down the second leaf blades. N export had virtually Acknowledgments-We wish to thank P. Filner for a generous supply of bacteroids for ceased, and the pool sizes of N03 N, a-amino N, and amide N the nitrate assays. We also thank S. K. Ries for the standardized wheat protein sample and helpful had risen slightly. After day 4, there was little further change in suggestions on the Kjeldahl digests, and R. Giaquinta for the heat-girdling technique. Plant Physiol. Vol. 63, 1979 PROLINE, TRANSLOCATION, AND WATER STRESS 523

LITERATURE CITED Sci 17:4381-442 1. BARNETT NM, AW NAYLOR 1966 Amino acid and in Bermuda grass 14. NELSON CE, GR SAFIR, AD HANSON 1978 Water potential in excised leaf tissue. Comparison during water stress. Plant Physiol 41: 1222-1230 of a commercial dew point hygrometer and a thermocouple psychrometer on soybean, 2. BOGGESS SF, CR STEWART, D ASPINALL, LG PALEG 1976 Effect of water stress on proline wheat, and barley. Plant Physiol 61: 131-133 synthesis from radioactive precursors. Plant Physiol 58: 398-401 15. PETERSON LW, GE KLENKOPF, RC HUFFAKER 1973 Evidence for lack of turnover ofribulose- 3. BoYER JS, HG MCPHERSON 1975 Physiology of water deficits in cereal crops. Adv Agron 27: 1,5-diphosphate carboxylase in barley leaves. Plant Physiol 51: 1042-1045 1-23 16. RosEN H 1957 A modified ninhydrin colorimetric analysis for amino acids. Arch Biochem 4. BREVEDAN ER, HF HODGES 1973 Effects of moisture deficits on "C translocation in corn (Zea Biophys 67: 10-15 mays L.). Plant Physiol 52: 436-439 17. SHANER DL, JS BOYER 1976 Nitrate reductase activity in (Zea mays L.) leaves. II. 5. CATALDO DA, LE SCHRADER, DM PETERSON, D SMITH 1975 Factors affecting seed protein Regulation by nitrate flux at low leaf water potential. Plant Physiol 58: 505-509 concentration in oats. I. Metabolism and distribution ofN and carbohydrate in two cultivars 18. SINGH TN, D ASPINALL, LG PALEG 1972 Proline accumulation and varietal adaptability to that differ in groat protein concentration. Crop Sci 15: 19-23 drought in barley: a potential metabolic measure of drought resistance. Nature New Biol 6. GATES CT 1957 The response of the young tomato plant to a brief period of water shortage. 236: 188-190 III. Drifts in nitrogen and phosphorus. Aust J Biol Sci 10: 125-146 19. SINGH TN, D ASPINALL, LG PALEG, SF BOGGESS 1973 Stress metabolism. II. Changes in 7. HANSON AD, CE NELsEN, EH EVERSON 1977 Evaluation of free proline accumulation as an proline concentration in excised plant tissues. Aust J Biol Sci 26: 57-63 index of drought resistance using two contrasting barley cultivars. Crop Sci 17: 720-726 20. SINGH TN, LG PALEG, D ASPINALL 1973 Stress metabolism. 1. Nitrogen metabolism and 8. HANSON AD, AR PEDERSEN, EH EVERSON 1977 Evaluation of proline accumulation as an growth in the barley plant during water stress. Aust J Biol Sci 26: 45-56 index of drought-resistance in barley. Agron Abstr p 85 21. SINGH TN, LG PALEG, D ASPINAUL 1973 Stress metabolism. III. Variations in response to 9. HELLEBUST JA, RGS BIDWELL 1964 Protein turnover in attached wheat and tobacco leaves. water deficit in the barley plant. Aust J Biol Sci 26: 65-76 Can J Bot 42: 1-12 22. STEYERMARK A 1961 Microdetermination of nitrogen by the Kjeldahl method. In Quantitative 10. KATZNELSON H, JW ROUATr, TMB PAYNE 1954 Liberation of amino acids by plant roots in Organic Microanalysis, Ed 2. Academic Press, New York, pp 188-220 relation to desiccation. Nature 174: 1 10-1111 23. TROLL W, J LINDSLEY 1955 A photometric method for the determination of proline. J Biol 11. LOWE RH, JL HAMILTON 1967 Rapid method for determination of nitrate in plant and soil Chem 215: 655-60 extracts. J Agric Food Chem 15: 359-361 24. VARNER JE, WA BuLEN, S VANECKO, RC BuRRELL 1953 Determination ofammonium, amide, 12. MoRILLA CA, JS BoYRa, RH HAGEMAN 1973 Nitrate reductase activity and polyribosome nitrite, and nitrate nitrogen in plant extracts. Anal Chem 25: 1528-1529 content of corn (Zea mays L.) having low leaf water potentials. Plant Physiol 51: 817-824 25. WARDLAW IF 1969 The effect of water stress on translocation in relation to and 13. NAIR TVR, YP ABROL 1977 Studies on nitrate reducing system in developing wheat ears. Crop growth. II. Effect during leaf development in Lolium temulenwum L. Aust J Biol Sci 22: 1-16