Black Tiger Fire Case Study

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Black Tiger Fire Case Study Black Tiger Fire Case Study Prepared by the NFPA9 National Fire Protection Association Sponsored by the National Wildland/Urban Interface Fire Protection Initiative Members of the Initiative: United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service National Association of State Foresters United States Department of Interior Bureau of Land Management National Fire Protection Association For more information or to order additional copies of this report, contact Fire Investigations Division, National Fire Protection Association P.O. Box 9101, Quincy, Massachusetts, 02269 ABSTRACT A human-caused wildland fire starting on July 9, 1989 in a scenic part of the Rocky Mountains near Boulder, Colorado, swept through residential areas nestled among the trees. Within the first five to six hours after ignition, 44 homes and other structures were destroyed and many others were damaged. The fire was not completely extinguished until four days later, after burning almost 2,100 acres. Loss estimates of homes and natural resources amounted to $10 million, and the cost to control the fire was another $1 million. More than 500 fire fighters from local, state and federal fire agencies worked to eventually contain the fire and protect the numerous other homes built in the rustic surroundings. Some of the fire fighters’ own homes were threatened or destroyed by the fire. Only a few minor fire fighter injuries were reported and one resident was hospitalized from burns. The result of this wildfire, especially the loss of the homes, represents an increasingly common example of the risks of building homes in what is called the wildland/urban interface, the term for a border zone where structures-mainly residences-are built in wildland areas that by nature are subject to fires. This fire, which soon outran the fire defenses in difficult terrain, demonstrated the predictable effects of a combination of factors: lack of rainfall; prolonged heat spell; wind; sloping topography; buildup of forest fuels; construction factors affecting the susceptibility of the home to fire; use of combustible construction materials; poor site access for emergency vehicles; and lack of a home’s site maintenance for fire protection. These factors plus the number of homes that were quickly threatened compounded the problems for the fire fighters. The Black Tiger Fire was the worst wildland fire loss in Colorado history, but the conditions that led to it are still prevalent in many parts of Colorado as well as in other states. The trend of building combustible homes in the flammable wildlands continues. In many of these areas the potential for similar or worse disaster currently exists, needing only an ignition source and the unfortunate development of hot, dry, windy weather conditions that come with dangerous regularity every year. For several years fire protection agencies have been attempting to warn affected home- owners nationwide of the risks of thesewildland areas, but most homeowners remain not fully aware of, or insufficiently concerned about, the problem. Many publications also offer guidance for homes in the wildland/urban interface (see the Appendix for a sampling). Proposed NFPA 299, Protection of Life and Property from Wildland Fire, will be a national standard that will present fundamental planning and design criteria for fire agencies, planners, architects, developers and government for the protection of life and property. It includes information on procedures and practices for safe development in areas that may be threatened by wildfire. To assure that it will be an acceptable document, it-as are all standards developed by the National Fire Protection Association-is being prepared by a committee of those who would be most affected: homeowners; interested individuals; architects; urban planners; and fire officials from local, state and federal agencies. 3 T ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This report has been prepared by the Na- This wildland fire is only one of many that tional Fire Protection Association (NFPA) at occur throughout the world each year. Under the request and in cooperation with the Boul- the sponsorship of the Initiative, the National der County Sheriff’s Department. The project Fire Protection Association will review, ana- was sponsored by the National Wildland/Urban lyze, and document additional wildland/urban Interface Fire Protection Initiative to further interface fires that cause destruction to homes the goals of the Initiative established in 1986. and structures. Those goals are to create general public The preparation of this report would awareness of the wildland interface prob- not have been possible without the able lems, to encourage the formation of partner- assistance of the following people: Sheriff ships among problem-solvers and interest Brad Leach and Sgt. Larry Stern of the Boul- groups, and to focus on the development of er County Sheriffs Office; Chief Ruth Rave- local solutions to wildland/urban interface el of the Sugarloaf Volunteer Fire Depart- fire problems. The Initiative is sponsored ment; Ron Zeleny and Dave Parker of the currently by the U.S. Department of Agricul- Colorado State Forest Service; Shelly Nolde ture Forest Service, U.S. Department of the and Bob Wilmot of the Arapaho/Roosevelt Interior, the National Association of National Forest; Brooke B. Smith, State Foresters, and the National Fire Jr., Fire Protection Engineer, As- Protection Association. Contact in- pen Engineering, Inc.; and nu- formation for each of these organi- merous other people from the or- zations is provided in the Appendix. ganizations listed above who con- As part of achieving the goals of tributed to this report. the Initiative, an analysis of the Black In addition, the on-site assis- Tiger Fire was undertaken. The tance and technical guidance pro- purpose of the analysis was to docu- vided to NFPA personnel by Al ment the fire, determine to the ex- Roberts, U.S.D.A. Forest Service tent possible the variables causing Regional Office in Denver, greatly the destruction, and make recom- enhanced our ability to prepare mendations on how to prevent simi- this report. Next, technical assis- lar occurrences. Thomas Klem, Di- tance and input to the fire growth rector of NFPA’s Fire Investigations and intensity analysis of the re- Division, served as project manager and tech- port were provided by Dick Rothermel, U.S.D.A. nical advisor. William Baden, Senior Fire Serv- Forest Service Intermountain Forest Range Ex- ice Specialist, NFPA, served as the technical periment Station in Missoula, Montana. Each of advisor for the project. Dr. John R. Hall, Jr., these individuals has made significant contri- Director, Fire Analysis and Research Division, butions to the technical accuracy of the report. NFPA, specifically contributed the section “Sta- The methodology used for the project and ap- tistical Analysis of Factors in Damaged Homes.” proach used in the analysis is described stan- The information from this report can be ing on page 37. used to assist planners, local officials, fire serv- Laurie Ruszcyk, as project secretary, served ice personnel and homeowners in Colorado numerous functions throughout the project and in other parts of the country in developing including coordination of technical reviews, firesafe homes and communities in the procurement of photos, and arrangement of wildland/urban interface, a term referring to the report for layout and printing. the geographical area where two diverse sys- Finally, Jerry Laughlin of Books On Fire tems-in this case, wildland and residential- served as technical editor and prepared the join and affect each other. 4 layout of the final document. OVERVIEW e officials across the nation are reporting associated with living in the wildlands. dramatic increases in the loss of homes to The population density of most cities is ex- wildfires. The 1980s have seen some of the tremely high. For example, Denver has ap- most severe wildfires in this century. In 1985, proximately 4,200 residents per square mile; for example, 1400 homes and other structures Los Angeles and Miami both have some 6,400 were damaged or destroyed in fires reported to per square mile; and New York City squeezes the U.S. Forest Service. Every year since 1985, in about 23,300 people per square mile. In ad- more than 300 homes have been lost to such dition, many city and suburban residents must wildfires, but the tragic losses are not just to contend with soaring property and rental costs property-lives of homeowners and fire fight- coupled with reduced services. They say urban ers are also lost every year. In 1987, more fire A dream areas feature excessive taxes, too-restrictive fighters died fighting wildland fires than any regulations, and endless noise, crime and grime. other single type of fire. homesite As a result, people are moving from cities to The fire danger to homes in the wildland/ the less-crowded wildlands because they offer urban interface is affected by five major fac- can become a scenic environment with generally lower tors: property costs, more privacy, fewer regula- a nightmare tions, less noise and less crime. w People continue to move to the This new trend is made possible by the scenic wildlands and build homes there. for the availability of a combination of services previ- This trend will continue to be influenced ously obtainable only in the cities and suburbs. by the less desirable factors of city and subur- unprepared. Now good connecting highways allow people ban life, as compared to the desirable factors to retain their jobs in the cities but escape to live Photo by NFPA in and enjoy the aesthetics of a home in the a long-defunct mining company. woods. Extending outward with the highways, generally good communications and other l Wildfires continue to ignite and utilities have provided important bridges be- threaten homes in the wildlands. tween the urban world of work and the rural To a city resident, a forest may represent world of new homes.
Recommended publications
  • Agricultural Sector Survey
    Report No. 1684-TU Turkey Agricultural Sector Survey (In Two Volumes) Public Disclosure Authorized Volume II: Annexes June 23, 1978 Projects Department Europe, Middle East and North Africa Regional Office FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Document of the World Bank This docUment has a restricted distribution and may be used by recipients only in the performance of their official duties. Its contents mray not otherwise be disclosed without World Bank authorization. CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS- DECEMBER 1976 / US$1.00 = 16.5 Turkish Lira (LT) LT 1.00 = us$o.o6 WEIGHTS AND MEASURES Metric System British/US System 1 kilogram (kg) = 2.2 pounds 1 metric ton (ton) = 2,205 pounds 1 millimeter (mm) = 0.04 inch 1 meter (m) = 3.28 feet 1 kilometer (km) = 0.62 mile 1 hectare (ha)=10 deca es (da) = 2.47 acre 1 square kilometer (kmc) = 0.386 square mile 1 liter (1) = 0.264 gallon 1 cubic meter (m3 ) = 35.28 cubic feet 1 million cubic meters (Mm3) = 810.7 acre feet 1 liter per second (1/sec) = 0.04 cubic feet per second GLOSSARY OF ABBREVIATIONS DSI - Ministry of Energy and Natural Resources' General Directorate of State Hydraulic Works EBK - Meat and Fish Organization FFYP - First Five-Year Plan (1963-1967) LRO - Land Reform Organization MA - Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Livestock MF - Ministry of Forestry MVA - Ministry of Village Affairs SEE - State Economic Enterprise SFYP - Second Five-Year Plan (1968-1972) SIS - State Institute of Statistics SPO - State Planning Organization TCZB - Agricultural Bank TEK - Turkish Electricity Authority TFYP - Third Five-Year Plan (1973-1977) TMO - Soil Products Office TOPRAKSU- MVA's General Directorate of Land and Water Resources Development TSEK - Milk Organization TSF - Turkish Sugar Factories Corporation TZDK - Agricultural Supply Organization GOVERNMENT OF TURKEY FISCAL YEAR March 1 - February 28 LI At the time of the mission's visit to Turkey, On March 31, 1978, the exchange rate was US$1,00 = 25,25 LT.
    [Show full text]
  • Nc Math 3.Indd
    CHAPTER 9 Geometric Modeling 9.1 Modeling with Area ..........................................................................................341 9.2 Modeling with Volume ......................................................................................347 9.3 Cross Sections of Solids ..................................................................................355 9.4 Solids of Revolution .........................................................................................361 Copyright © Big Ideas Learning, LLC 339 All rights reserved. Name _________________________________________________________ Date __________ Chapter Maintaining Mathematical Proficiency 9 Find the area of the circle or regular polygon. 1. 2. 3.7 ft 4.7 in. 5 ft 3. a circle with a diameter of 74.6 centimeters 4. a regular hexagon with a perimeter of 42 yards and an apothem of 4.25 yards 5. a circle with a circumference of 24π meters Find the surface area and volume of the solid. 6. 7. 35 cm 8 in. 6 in. 28 cm 12 in. 8. 9. 37 m 58 yd 23 m Copyright © Big Ideas Learning, LLC All rights reserved. 340 Name _________________________________________________________ Date _________ Modeling with Area 9.1 For use with Exploration 9.1 Essential Question How can you use the population and area of a region to describe how densely the region is populated? 1 EXPLORATION: Exploring Population and Area Work with a partner. Use the Internet to find the population and land area of each county in California. Then find the number of people per square mile for each county. a. Mendocino County b. Lake County c. Yolo County d. Napa County e. Sonoma County f. Marin County Copyright © Big Ideas Learning, LLC 341 All rights reserved. Name _________________________________________________________ Date __________ 9.1 Modeling with Area (continued) 2 EXPLORATION: Analyzing Population and Area Work with a partner.
    [Show full text]
  • Useful Forestry Measurements Acre: a Unit of Area Equaling 43,560
    Useful Forestry Measurements Acre: A unit of area equaling 43,560 square feet or 10 square chains. Basal Area: The area, usually in square feet, of the cross-section of a tree stem near its base, generally at breast height and inclusive of bark. The basal area per acre measurement gives you some idea of crowding of trees in a stand. Board Foot: A unit of area for measuring lumber equaling 12 inches by 12 inches by 1 inch. Chain: A unit of length. A surveyor’s chain equals 66 feet or 1/80-mile. Cord: A pile of stacked wood measuring 4 feet by 4 feet by 8 feet when originally conceived. Cubic Foot: A unit of volume measure, wood equivalent to a solid cube that measures 12 inches by 12 inches by 12 inches or 1,728 cubic inches. Cunit: A volume of wood measuring 3 feet and 1-1/2 inches by 4 feet by 8 feet and containing 100 solid cubic feet of wood. D.B.H. (diameter breast height): The measurement of a tree’s diameter at 4-1/2 feet above the ground line. M.B.F. (thousand board feet): A unit of measure containing 1,000 board feet. Section: A unit of area containing 640 acres or one square mile. Square Foot: A unit of area equaling 144 square inches. Township: A unit of land area covering 23,040 acres or 36 sections. Equations Cords per acre (based on 10 Basal Area Factor (BAF) angle gauge) (# of 8 ft sticks + # of trees)/(2 x # plots) Based on 10 Basal Area Factor Angle Gauge Example: (217+30)/(2 x 5) = 24.7 cords/acre BF per acre ((# of 8 ft logs + # of trees)/(2 x # plots)) x 500 Bd ft Example: (((150x2)+30)/(2x5))x500 = 9000 BF/acre or
    [Show full text]
  • Weights and Measures Standards of the United States—A Brief History (1963), by Lewis V
    WEIGHTS and MEASURES STANDARDS OF THE UMIT a brief history U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS NBS Special Publication 447 WEIGHTS and MEASURES STANDARDS OF THE TP ii 2ri\ ii iEa <2 ^r/V C II llinCAM NBS Special Publication 447 Originally Issued October 1963 Updated March 1976 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Wash., D.C. 20402. Price $1; (Add 25 percent additional for other than U.S. mailing). Stock No. 003-003-01654-3 Library of Congress Catalog Card Number: 76-600055 Foreword "Weights and Measures," said John Quincy Adams in 1821, "may be ranked among the necessaries of life to every individual of human society." That sentiment, so appropriate to the agrarian past, is even more appropriate to the technology and commerce of today. The order that we enjoy, the confidence we place in weighing and measuring, is in large part due to the measure- ment standards that have been established. This publication, a reprinting and updating of an earlier publication, provides detailed information on the origin of our standards for mass and length. Ernest Ambler Acting Director iii Preface to 1976 Edition Two publications of the National Bureau of Standards, now out of print, that deal with weights and measures have had widespread use and are still in demand. The publications are NBS Circular 593, The Federal Basis for Weights and Measures (1958), by Ralph W. Smith, and NBS Miscellaneous Publication 247, Weights and Measures Standards of the United States—a Brief History (1963), by Lewis V.
    [Show full text]
  • The International System of Units (SI) - Conversion Factors For
    NIST Special Publication 1038 The International System of Units (SI) – Conversion Factors for General Use Kenneth Butcher Linda Crown Elizabeth J. Gentry Weights and Measures Division Technology Services NIST Special Publication 1038 The International System of Units (SI) - Conversion Factors for General Use Editors: Kenneth S. Butcher Linda D. Crown Elizabeth J. Gentry Weights and Measures Division Carol Hockert, Chief Weights and Measures Division Technology Services National Institute of Standards and Technology May 2006 U.S. Department of Commerce Carlo M. Gutierrez, Secretary Technology Administration Robert Cresanti, Under Secretary of Commerce for Technology National Institute of Standards and Technology William Jeffrey, Director Certain commercial entities, equipment, or materials may be identified in this document in order to describe an experimental procedure or concept adequately. Such identification is not intended to imply recommendation or endorsement by the National Institute of Standards and Technology, nor is it intended to imply that the entities, materials, or equipment are necessarily the best available for the purpose. National Institute of Standards and Technology Special Publications 1038 Natl. Inst. Stand. Technol. Spec. Pub. 1038, 24 pages (May 2006) Available through NIST Weights and Measures Division STOP 2600 Gaithersburg, MD 20899-2600 Phone: (301) 975-4004 — Fax: (301) 926-0647 Internet: www.nist.gov/owm or www.nist.gov/metric TABLE OF CONTENTS FOREWORD.................................................................................................................................................................v
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix B) Measurement & Conversion Factors
    Measurement & Conversion Factors Appendix B) Measurement & Conversion Factors Units of Measure Measurement Values As Used in this Guide Metric Equivalent 1 acre 2.47 hectares (ha) acre hectare (ha) Surveyor's Measures 3 cubic foot cubic meter (m ) 1 acre 43,560 square feet gallon/Mgallon liter (L), cubic meter (m3) 640 acres 1 square mile hundredweight kilogram (kg) 1 section 640 acres linear foot meter (m) 7.92 inches 1 link mile kilometer (km) 25 links 1 rod pound kilogram (kg) for mass 4 rods 1 chain square foot square meter (m2) 10 square chains ton tonne (t) 1 acre (160 square rods) Bushel Weights 80 chains 1 mile 1 bushel (bu) equals 8 gallons (gal) 1 Gunther's chain 66 feet Water 1 bushel of: weighs 1 gallon (gal) 8.34 pounds (lbs) wheat 60 pounds (lbs) corn 56 pounds 1 million gallons (Mgal) 3.07 acre feet (acre-ft) grain sorghum 56 pounds 1 cubic foot (ft3) 62.4 pounds (lbs) sunflowers 27 pounds 1 cubic foot (ft3) 7.48 gallons (gal) cottonseed 32 pounds canola 50 pounds 1 acre-foot (acre-ft) 325,851 gallons (gal) edible beans 60 pounds 1 acre-foot (acre-ft) 43,560 cubic feet (ft3) rye 56 pounds 17.4 million gallons per barley 48 pounds 1 inch of rain square mile (Mgal/mi2) millet 50 pounds 27,200 gallons per acre 1 inch of rain (gal/ac) Mass (Weight) Conversion Factors 1 inch of rain 100 tons per acre To convert from to multiply by One acre-foot equals the volume of water needed to cover an pound (lb) kilogram (kg) 0.4535924 area the size of one acre with water one foot deep.
    [Show full text]
  • Explanation of Flow Rate
    Explanation of Flow Rate Rate: ​ Rate problems are any measured amount over another variable (a ratio). An example would be distance over time like miles per hour. It could be unit price of an item or a production rate. Rate problems are very common in all standardized math tests. Examples: $3 Unit Rate­ $3 per gallon is 1 gallon 80 miles 60 minutes 80 miles in 90 minutes is 90 minutes x 1 hour =53.3mph Flow rate is an amount of fluid traveling over time. It is a key concept when working with any fluids from medical to hydraulics. Here we are primarily looking at water flow rates. Flow rate is the amount of water (volume) over time. The amount of water moving through the system can be measured in one of three different units. They are gpm (gallons per minute), mgd (millions of gallons per day), and cfs (cubic feet per second). Example: Convert cfs to gallons per minute: 90 cf 7.5 gallons 60 seconds 90 cubic feet per second is sec x 1 cf X 1 minute =40,500 gallons per minute Instructional video on how to calculate flow rate The conversions are listed below. 7.5 gallons = 1 cubic foot 5280 feet = 1 mile 640 acres = 1 square mile 43560 square feet = 1 acre mgd x 700 = gpm cfs x 449 = gpm Example: A pipeline has a carrying capacity of 3 cfs. How many gpm can it handle? 3 cubic ft. 7.5 gallons 60 seconds 1350 gallons Solution: 1 second x 1 cubic foot x 1 minute = : minute Example: If the dimensions of California are approximately 220 miles wide and 740 miles long, what is the surface area in square miles of our state? Solution: SA = 220 miles x 740 miles = 162,800 square miles Example: If we had a state average annual rainfall of 30 inches, how many acre feet of water would that be? 640 acres 1 ft.
    [Show full text]
  • Conversion Factors Length
    Conversion Factors Length Multiply By To obtain Miles 1.60935 Kilometers 1,760 Yards 5,280 Feet 63,360 Inches Meters 0.00062137 Miles 1.0936 Yards 3.28088 Feet 39.37 Inches 100 Centimeters 0.001 Kilometers Yards 0.9144 Meters 0.00056818 Miles 3.0 Feet 36 Inches Feet 0.3048 Meters 0.00018939 Miles 0.33333 Yards 12 Inches Inches 0.08333 Feet 0.027778 Yards 0.000015783 Miles 2.54 Centimeters Area Square miles 4,014,489,600 Square inches 27,878,400 Square feet 3,097,600 Square yards 640 Acres 259 Hectares Acres 208.71 Square feet 0.404687 Hectares 0.0015625 Square miles 4,840 Square yards 43,560 Square feet 4,047 Square meters Square yards 0.83613 0.0000003228 Square miles 0.0002066 Acres 9 Square feet 1,296 Square inches Square feet 0.092903 Square meters 0.000000003587 Square miles 0.000022957 Acres 0.11111 Square yards 144 Square inches Square inches 0.0000000002491 Square miles 6.45163 Square centimeters 0.0000001594 Acres 0.0007716 Square yards 0.006944 Square feet Volume Acre-feet 325,851 U.S. gallons 43,560 Cubic feet 1,613.3 Cubic yards 1,233.49 Cubic meters Cubic yards 27 Cubic feet 46,656 Cubic inches 0.00061983 Acre-feet 0.76456 Cubic meters Cubic feet 1,728 Cubic inches 7.4805 U.S. gallons 28.317 Liters 0.037037 Cubic yards 0.000022957 Acre-feet C1 Conversion Factors (continued) Volume (continued) Multiply By To obtain U.S. gallons 231 Cubic inches 3.78543 Liters 0.13368 Cubic feet 0.00000307 Acre-feet Cubic inches 16.3872 Cubic centimeters 0.004329 U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Metroform Residents Seek Identity NEWS · 1-12A RELIGION 9A Bye
    In Sports . Co Published every Friday February 19, 1993 35¢ Mum's the word UD quiet about plans for center ByE. Fine Post Staff Reporter Plans for the University of Delaware's new student center wi ll be made public o nl y after they Go have been reviewed by ad ministra­ tors a nd th e school's board of trustees, school officials said. figure The proposed student center was the subject of meetings betwee n Newark Business · Post Photo/E. Fine Association members and school Students at Geoff Bock scored 15 points to lead St. Mark's to an officials las t fall when it was McVey 62-44 victory over St. Elizabeth's Sunday afternoon at feared the inclusion of retail space Elementary who St. Mark's. there would jeopardize established are in the "Math businesses on Newark 's Main Their Way" Street. math and sci­ Inside In setting aside space for retail ence program celebrated the YOUR MONEY, A GUIDE merchants, unive rsity officials would be taking th eo same risk as 100th day of TO TAXES AND FINANCE any other business, said John school by mak­ is included in this week's Brook, a University of Delaware ing the number newspaper. Learn about a administrator. 1 00. The math woman from Maine who Brook said the university would program teaches claims to feed her family of not have any advantages over other students to think eight on $170 a month, and business people looking to develop math by doing it, says she believes you can similar projects.
    [Show full text]
  • Checking the Net Contents of Packaged Goods
    Handbook 133 – 2020 Appendix E. General Tables of Units of Measurement Appendix E. General Tables of Units of Measurement These tables have been prepared for the benefit of those requiring tables of units for occasional ready reference. In Section 4. Tables of Units of Measurement of this Appendix, the tables are carried out to a large number of decimal places and exact values are indicated by underlining. In most of the other tables, only a limited number of decimal places are given, therefore making the tables better adapted to the average user. Section 1. Tables of Metric Units of Measurement In the metric system of measurement, designations of multiples and subdivisions of any unit may be arrived at by combining with the name of the unit the prefixes deka, hecto, and kilo meaning, respectively, 10, 100, and 1000, and deci, centi, and milli, meaning, respectively, one-tenth, one-hundredth, and one-thousandth. In some of the following metric tables, some such multiples and subdivisions have not been included for the reason that these have little, if any currency in actual usage. In certain cases, particularly in scientific usage, it becomes convenient to provide for multiples larger than 1000 and for subdivisions smaller than one-thousandth. Accordingly, the following prefixes have been introduced and these are now generally recognized: yotta, (Y) meaning 1024 deci, (d), meaning 10-1 zetta, (Z), meaning 1021 centi, (c), meaning 10-2 exa, (E), meaning 1018 milli, (m), meaning 10-3 peta, (P), meaning 1015 micro, (µ), meaning 10-6 tera, (T), meaning 1012 nano, (n), meaning 10-9 giga, (G), meaning 109 pico, (p), meaning 10-12 mega, (M), meaning 106 femto, (f), meaning 10-15 kilo, (k), meaning 103 atto, (a), meaning 10-18 hecto, (h), meaning 102 zepto, (z), meaning 10-21 deka, (da), meaning 101 yocto, (y), meaning 10-24 Thus a kilometer is 1000 meters and a millimeter is 0.001 meter.
    [Show full text]
  • Common Weights and Measures
    Common Weights and Measures Length Metric System 1 millimeter = 1/1,000 meter 1 centimeter = 1/100 meter 1 decimeter = 1/10 meter 1 meter (basic unit of length) 1 dekameter = 10 meters 1 kilometer = 1,000 meters American and British Units 1 inch = 1/36 yard = 1/12 foot 1 foot = 1/3 yard 1 yard (basic unit of length) 1 rod = 5 1/2 yards 1 furlong = 220 yards = 40 rods 1 mile = 1,760 yards = 5,280 feet 1 fathom = 6 feet 1 nautical mile = 6,076.1 feet Conversion Factors 1 centimeter = 0.39 inch 1 inch = 2.54 centimeters 1 meter = 39.37 inches 1 foot = 0.305 meter 1 meter = 3.28 feet 1 yard = 0.914 meter 1 meter = 1.094 yards 1 kilometer = 0.62 mile 1 mile = 1.609 kilometers Area Metric System 1 square centimeter = 1/10,000 square meter 1 square decimeter = 1/100 square meter 1 square meter (basic unit of area) 1 are = 100 square meters 1 hectare = 10,000 square meters = 100 ares 1 square kilometer = 1,000,000 square meters American and British Units 1 square inch = 1/1,296 square yard = 1/144 square foot 1 square foot = 1/9 square yard 1 square yard (basic unit of area) 1 square rod = 30 1/4 square yards 1 acre = 4,840 square yards = 160 square rods 1 square mile = 3,097,600 square yards = 640 acres Conversion Factors 1 square centimeter = 0.155 square inch 1 square inch = 6.45 square centimeters 1 acre = 0.405 hectare 1 hectare = 2.47 acres 1 square kilometer = 0.386 square mile 1 square mile = 2.59 square kilometers Volume and Capacity (Liquid and Dry) Metric System 1 cubic centimeter = 1/1,000,000 cubic meter 1 cubic decimeter = 1/1,000 cubic meter 1 cubic meter = 1 stere (basic unit of volume) 1 milliliter = 1/1,000 liter = 1 cubic centimeter 1 centiliter = 1/100 liter 1 deciliter = 1/10 liter 1 liter = 1 cubic decimeter (basic unit of capacity) 1 dekaliter = 10 liters 1 hectoliter = 100 liters = 1/10 cubic meter American and British Units 1 cubic inch = 1/46,656 cubic yard = 1/1,728 cubic foot 1 cubic foot = 1/27 cubic yard 1 cubic yard (basic unit of volume) 1 U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Imperial System Apprenticeship and Workplace Mathematics (Grade 10/Literacy Foundations Level 7) © 2012 by Open School BC
    Version 01 The Imperial System Apprenticeship and Workplace Mathematics (Grade 10/Literacy Foundations Level 7) © 2012 by Open School BC http://mirrors.creativecommons.org/presskit/buttons/88x31/eps/by-nc.eps This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ Permissions beyond the scope of this license are identified in the materials by a copyright symbol and are outlined below. To request permission to use the exclusions to this Creative Commons license, contact the author/publisher of the third party materials: Third party copyright exclusions include: All photographs used under license from Shutterstock.com. The Data Pages were reproduced with permission from the BC Ministry of Education. Course History New, March 2012 Project Partners This course was developed in partnership with the Distributed Learning Resources Branch of Alberta Education and the following organizations: • Black Gold Regional Schools • Calgary Board of Education • Edmonton Public Schools • Peace Wapiti School Division No. 76 • Pembina Hills Regional Division No. 7 • Rocky View School Division No. 41 Project Management: Jennifer Riddel, Shannon Mitchell Content Revisions: Jennifer Riddel Edit: Leanne Baugh Math Edit: Learning Centre of the Greater Victoria School District Continuing Education Program: • Nigel Cocking • Keith Myles • Bill Scott Module Tests: Barb Lajeunesse, Michael Finnigan (SD 34) Copyright: Ilona Ugro Production
    [Show full text]