DOCSLIB.ORG

University of Groningen Fish Microfossils from the Upper Silurian

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
University of Groningen Fish Microfossils from the Upper Silurian University of Groningen Fish microfossils from the Upper Silurian Öved Sandstone Formation, Skåne, southern Sweden Vergoossen, Johannes Marie Josephus IMPORTANT NOTE: You are advised to consult the publisher's version (publisher's PDF) if you wish to cite from it. Please check the document version below. Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Publication date: 2003 Link to publication in University of Groningen/UMCG research database Citation for published version (APA): Vergoossen, J. M. J. (2003). Fish microfossils from the Upper Silurian Öved Sandstone Formation, Skåne, southern Sweden. s.n. Copyright Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). The publication may also be distributed here under the terms of Article 25fa of the Dutch Copyright Act, indicated by the “Taverne” license. More information can be found on the University of Groningen website: https://www.rug.nl/library/open-access/self-archiving-pure/taverne- amendment. Take-down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Downloaded from the University of Groningen/UMCG research database (Pure): http://www.rug.nl/research/portal. For technical reasons the number of authors shown on this cover page is limited to 10 maximum. Download date: 04-10-2021 9 FISH MICROFOSSILS FROM THE UPPER SILURIAN ÖVED SANDSTONE FORMATION, SKÅNE, SOUTHERN SWEDEN. Chapter 1 Fish microfossils from Helvetesgraven (I) (Published in Geologie & Mijnbouw, 78: 267-280, 1999) A contribution to IGCP 406 Circum-Arctic Palaeozoic Vertebrates Abstract. The fauna comprises scales of jawless fishes (rare osteostracans, and the thelodonts Thelodus parvidens, ‘T. traquairi’, T. sculptilis, T. admirabilis and ‘Loganellia cuneata’) and of Gnathostomata (the acanthodians Nostolepis striata, Gomphonchus sandelensis, Poracanthodes? lehmani sp. nov. and Poracanthodes cf. punctatus, tesserae of the head and other ‘specialised elements’ of the squamation; and the osteichthyan Andreolepis hedei). The fauna is as old as, or slightly younger than, those from the complex of sedimentary rocks along the Anglo-Central Urals margin of the Laurussian continent affected by the Ludfordian A. hedei Event. This event marks the transition between the hedei and sculptilis Zones of the Microvertebrate Standard Zonation and can be correlated with the snajdri Conodont Interval Zone. The evidence favours a simultaneous paleogeographical appearance of the punctatiform and porosiform poracanthodid acanthodians within the Baltica region of Laurussia. [Text-] Figure 1. Geological map of Skåne (simplified after Jeppsson & Laufeld 1986: fig. 5). Introduction The fauna of an unregistered residue sample from ‘Övedskloster’, kept in the Naturhistoriska Riksmuseet, Palaeozoology section, Stockholm (NRS), is listed. The geographical reference to 10 Övedskloster is probably a less accurate indication for the second quarry at Helvetesgraven (see below). The biostratigraphical implications of the fauna are discussed and a comparison is made with the fauna from ‘Övedskloster’ described by Lehman (1937). Paleontological comments and brief descriptions are included, but complementary details will be published later. The outcrops at Helvetesgraven (Text-fig. 1) and adjacent localities are in the Lower Pridoli Öved Sandstone Formation, which is part of the Upper Silurian Öved-Ramsåsa Group (Jeppsson & Laufeld 1986).The Öved Sandstone Fm. comprises sandstones, shales and subordinate thin limestone bands with marine faunas, in which the increasing importance of the bivalves indicates a shallowing upwards (Jeppsson & Laufeld 1986). The type locality is the second quarry at Helvetesgraven, which has been filled with water for decades. Reddish sandstone is still exposed in a few small sections. Pieces of bone-bed from the dump piles at the quarry were placed in the Ligonodina elegans Conodont Zone by Jeppsson (1974; 1982; this volume, Chapter 4: Chart 1). In Skåne this zone represents the youngest Silurian. Within this zone Jeppsson (1974; see also Jeppsson & Laufeld 1986) distinguished a local fauna with Hindeodella steinhornensis new subspecies 2 on the basis of the conodonts from Helvetesgraven. This local zone represents a fauna that Jeppsson (1974: 12 & table 1) considered slightly less “advanced” than the one from his sample Ramsåsa F 66. The unregistered residue of which I studied the fish fauna, was labelled Övedskloster in T. Ørvig's handwriting and was kept in the cabinet where Ørvig's thin sections and other residue samples are stored in the NRS. The sample contained few loose, red sediment particles, and reddish white fossils sometimes with particles of sediment adhering to them. I assume that the rock which yielded the fish remains was collected at the type locality. The printed stickers on the pieces of rock in the NRS collection bear the combined site name Övedskloster-Helvetesgraven. The problems related to collecting from the outcrops at Helvetesgraven were summed up by Jeppsson & Laufeld (1986). Ørvig may have received the residue or rock sample from a source outside the NRS. No notes relating to the residue could be traced in the NRS. Most of the samples for the study of the Scanian fish fauna by Lehman (1937) were collected by Stensiö in 1924. Lehman’s material from Övedskloster came from the second quarry at Helvetesgraven (Jeppsson & Laufeld 1986; cf. Lehman 1937: 9). For these reasons I shall refer to Helvetesgraven as the site that yielded the faunas. Since Lehman (1937: 5) stated that a small part of his material had been collected by Grönwall, or even before Grönwall, it cannot be entirely excluded that samples from other outcrops in the vicinity were involved. History of fish research Lehman (1937) described the Late Silurian microvertebrate fauna from Helvetesgraven in combination with that from nearby Ramsåsa (Figure 1). He compared the two faunas by their lists of taxa (Lehman 1937: 86-88) and by the number of identified scales (op. cit.: 33, 56-57). His taxa were based on a total of c. 368 thelodont and acanthodian scales from both localities, as well as spines, teeth and other remains. The faunal list for Helvetesgraven is about 50% shorter (26 taxa, including 6 possible occurrences; a total of c. 56 scales) than that for Ramsåsa (53 taxa, including 3 possible occurrences; a total of 312 scales). Lehman (1937: 82) remarked that the acanthodians were better represented than thelodonts at Helvetesgraven, whereas it was just the other way round at Ramsåsa. Lehman (1937: 86-88) listed the following taxa from Helvetesgraven: thelodont scales (11, assigned to 8 scale taxa): Thelodus laevis Pander aff. planus, T. glaber Pander, T. parvidens Agassiz; the presence of the following 5 taxa was uncertain: T. laevis, T. carinatus Pander, T. schmidti Pander, T. goebeli Pander and T. trilobatus Hoppe (large variation); acanthodian scales (45, assigned to 9 taxa): Gomphodus sandelensis Pander, Poracanthodes margaritatus Lehman, Diplacanthoides compressus Lehman, D. furcatus Brotzen, D. insignis Brotzen, D. multicostatus Lehman; the presence of the following 3 taxa was possible: Gomphodus volborthi Rohon, Diplacanthoides elegans Brotzen and D. sinuosus Lehman; acanthodian spine taxa (5): Onchus 11 murchisoni Agassiz, O. tenuistriatus Agassiz, O. roemeri Hoppe, O. curvatus Pander and Onchus? brotzeni Lehman. In addition, the presence of cyathaspid, cephalaspid and arthrodire remains, as well as the possible presence of elasmobranch teeth, were recorded. Lehman's taxon names will be discussed below. Turner (1984) mentioned a sample from the “Övedskloster sandstone from Helvetesgraven” yielding one ostracode, the thelodonts Thelodus parvidens, Loganella ludlowiensis Gross, Loganella sp., and acanthodian scales. As a rule, in post Second World War biostratigraphical evaluations, the fish fauna from Helvetesgraven was not treated separately from that of Ramsåsa (e.g. Märss 1986b, text-fig. 46). Lehman's nomenclature: the taxa from Helvetesgraven None of the scales described and illustrated from the Helvetesgraven site by Lehman (1937) have been traced in the NRS collection. A comparison of his material with the new material can therefore be made only on the basis of his text and illustrations. Only Lehman’s (1937) figures 55- 63 (acanthodian scales), 77 (acanthodian teeth), 83-84 (acanthodian spines) show the morphology of material from Helvetesgraven. Turner (1976, 1984: table 5.2) was the first fish researcher who tried to assess and update Lehman's nomenclature for the thelodonts. Of the taxa found with certainty at Helvetesgraven, she referred Thelodus glaber to T. parvidens (cf. also Gross 1967) and T. laevis aff. planus to T. costatus. Of the taxa possibly present at Helvetesgraven she referred the scales of T. schmidti to T. sculptilis, T. traquairi and T. schmidti. The scales of T. goebeli were referred to T. sculptilis and T. schmidti. Turner (1984) assigned the scales of T. carinatus to T. sculptilis, and those of T. laevis to T. parvidens. T. schmidti scales, which were partly grouped with the redefined T. carinatus Pander and partly with the redefined T. laevis by Märss (1986b), are easily distinguished by their histology (dentinal tubules strongly curved rostrad).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Categorical Versus Geometric Morphometric Approaches To
    [Palaeontology, 2020, pp. 1–16] CATEGORICAL VERSUS GEOMETRIC MORPHOMETRIC APPROACHES TO CHARACTERIZING THE EVOLUTION OF MORPHOLOGICAL DISPARITY IN OSTEOSTRACI (VERTEBRATA, STEM GNATHOSTOMATA) by HUMBERTO G. FERRON 1,2* , JENNY M. GREENWOOD1, BRADLEY DELINE3,CARLOSMARTINEZ-PEREZ 1,2,HECTOR BOTELLA2, ROBERT S. SANSOM4,MARCELLORUTA5 and PHILIP C. J. DONOGHUE1,* 1School of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Life Sciences Building, Tyndall Avenue, Bristol, BS8 1TQ, UK; [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] 2Institut Cavanilles de Biodiversitat i Biologia Evolutiva, Universitat de Valencia, C/ Catedratic Jose Beltran Martınez 2, 46980, Paterna, Valencia, Spain; [email protected], [email protected] 3Department of Geosciences, University of West Georgia, Carrollton, GA 30118, USA; [email protected] 4School of Earth & Environmental Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PT, UK; [email protected] 5School of Life Sciences, University of Lincoln, Riseholme Hall, Lincoln, LN2 2LG, UK; [email protected] *Corresponding authors Typescript received 2 October 2019; accepted in revised form 27 February 2020 Abstract: Morphological variation (disparity) is almost aspects of morphology. Phylomorphospaces reveal conver- invariably characterized by two non-mutually exclusive gence towards a generalized ‘horseshoe’-shaped cranial mor- approaches: (1) quantitatively, through geometric morpho- phology and two strong trends involving major groups of metrics;
    [Show full text]
  • Proposed Black Country UNESCO Global Geopark
    Great things to see and do in the Proposed Black Country UNESCO Global Geopark Black Country UNESCO Global Geopark Project The layers lying above these are grey muddy Welcome to the world-class rocks that contain seams of ironstone, fireclay heritage which is the Black and coal with lots of fossils of plants and insects. These rocks tell us of a time some 310 million Country years ago (called the Carboniferous Period, The Black Country is an amazing place with a named after the carbon in the coal) when the captivating history spanning hundreds of Black Country was covered in huge steamy millions of years. This is a geological and cultural rainforests. undiscovered treasure of the UK, located at the Sitting on top of those we find reddish sandy heart of the country. It is just 30 minutes from rocks containing ancient sand dunes and Birmingham International Airport and 10 minutes pebbly river beds. This tells us that the landscape by train from the city of Birmingham. dried out to become a scorching desolate The Black Country is where many essential desert (this happened about 250 million years aspects of the Industrial Revolution began. It ago and lasted through the Permian and Triassic was the world’s first large scale industrial time periods). landscape where anything could be made, The final chapter in the making of our landscape earning it the nick-name the ‘workshop of the is often called the’ Ice Age’. It spans the last 2.6 world’ during the Industrial Revolution. This million years of our history when vast ice sheets short guidebook introduces some of the sites scraped across the surface of the area, leaving and features that are great things to see and a landscaped sculpted by ice and carved into places to explore across many parts of The the hills and valleys we see today.
    [Show full text]
  • Fish and Amphibians
    Fish and Amphibians Geology 331 Paleontology Phylum Chordata: Subphyla Urochordata, Cephalochordata, and: Subphylum Vertebrata Class Agnatha: jawless fish, includes the hagfish, conodonts, lampreys, and ostracoderms (armored jawless fish) Gnathostomates: jawed fish Class Chondrichthyes: cartilaginous fish Class Placoderms: armored fish Class Osteichthyes: bony fish Subclass Actinopterygians: ray-finned fish Subclass Sarcopterygians: lobe-finned fish Order Dipnoans: lung fish Order Crossopterygians: coelocanths and rhipidistians Class Amphibia Urochordates: Sea Squirts. Adults have a pharynx with gill slits. Larval forms are free-swimming and have a notochord. Chordates are thought to have evolved from the larval form by precocious sexual maturation. Chordate evolution Cephalochordate: Branchiostoma, the lancelet Pikaia, a cephalochordate from the Burgess Shale Yunnanozoon, a cephalochordate from the Lower Cambrian of China Haikouichthys, agnathan, Lower Cambrian of China - Chengjiang fauna, scale is 5 mm A living jawless fish, the lamprey, Class Agnatha Jawless fish do have teeth! A fossil jawless fish, Class Agnatha, Ostracoderm, Hemicyclaspis, Silurian Agnathan, Ostracoderm, Athenaegis, Silurian of Canada Agnathan, Ostracoderm, Pteraspis, Devonian of the U.K. Agnathan, Ostracoderm, Liliaspis, Devonian of Russia Jaws evolved by modification of the gill arch bones. The placoderms were the armored fish of the Paleozoic Placoderm, Dunkleosteus, Devonian of Ohio Asterolepis, Placoderms, Devonian of Latvia Placoderm, Devonian of Australia Chondrichthyes: A freshwater shark of the Carboniferous Fossil tooth of a Great White shark Chondrichthyes, Great White Shark Chondrichthyes, Carcharhinus Sphyrna - hammerhead shark Himantura - a ray Manta Ray Fish Anatomy: Ray-finned fish Osteichthyes: ray-finned fish: clownfish Osteichthyes: ray-finned fish, deep water species Lophius, an Eocene fish showing the ray fins. This is an anglerfish.
    [Show full text]
  • Fins, Limbs, and Tails: Outgrowths and Axial Patterning in Vertebrate Evolution Michael I
    Review articles Fins, limbs, and tails: outgrowths and axial patterning in vertebrate evolution Michael I. Coates1* and Martin J. Cohn2 Summary Current phylogenies show that paired fins and limbs are unique to jawed verte- brates and their immediate ancestry. Such fins evolved first as a single pair extending from an anterior location, and later stabilized as two pairs at pectoral and pelvic levels. Fin number, identity, and position are therefore key issues in vertebrate developmental evolution. Localization of the AP levels at which develop- mental signals initiate outgrowth from the body wall may be determined by Hox gene expression patterns along the lateral plate mesoderm. This regionalization appears to be regulated independently of that in the paraxial mesoderm and axial skeleton. When combined with current hypotheses of Hox gene phylogenetic and functional diversity, these data suggest a new model of fin/limb developmental evolution. This coordinates body wall regions of outgrowth with primitive bound- aries established in the gut, as well as the fundamental nonequivalence of pectoral and pelvic structures. BioEssays 20:371–381, 1998. ௠ 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Introduction over and again to exemplify fundamental concepts in biological Vertebrate appendages include an amazing diversity of form, theory. The striking uniformity of teleost pectoral fin skeletons from the huge wing-like fins of manta rays or the stumpy limbs of illustrated Geoffroy Saint-Hilair’s discussion of ‘‘special analo- frogfishes, to ichthyosaur paddles, the extraordinary fingers of gies,’’1 while tetrapod limbs exemplified Owen’s2 related concept aye-ayes, and the fin-like wings of penguins. The functional of ‘‘homology’’; Darwin3 then employed precisely the same ex- diversity of these appendages is similarly vast and, in addition to ample as evidence of evolutionary descent from common ances- various modes of locomotion, fins and limbs are also used for try.
    [Show full text]
  • Copyrighted Material
    06_250317 part1-3.qxd 12/13/05 7:32 PM Page 15 Phylum Chordata Chordates are placed in the superphylum Deuterostomia. The possible rela- tionships of the chordates and deuterostomes to other metazoans are dis- cussed in Halanych (2004). He restricts the taxon of deuterostomes to the chordates and their proposed immediate sister group, a taxon comprising the hemichordates, echinoderms, and the wormlike Xenoturbella. The phylum Chordata has been used by most recent workers to encompass members of the subphyla Urochordata (tunicates or sea-squirts), Cephalochordata (lancelets), and Craniata (fishes, amphibians, reptiles, birds, and mammals). The Cephalochordata and Craniata form a mono- phyletic group (e.g., Cameron et al., 2000; Halanych, 2004). Much disagree- ment exists concerning the interrelationships and classification of the Chordata, and the inclusion of the urochordates as sister to the cephalochor- dates and craniates is not as broadly held as the sister-group relationship of cephalochordates and craniates (Halanych, 2004). Many excitingCOPYRIGHTED fossil finds in recent years MATERIAL reveal what the first fishes may have looked like, and these finds push the fossil record of fishes back into the early Cambrian, far further back than previously known. There is still much difference of opinion on the phylogenetic position of these new Cambrian species, and many new discoveries and changes in early fish systematics may be expected over the next decade. As noted by Halanych (2004), D.-G. (D.) Shu and collaborators have discovered fossil ascidians (e.g., Cheungkongella), cephalochordate-like yunnanozoans (Haikouella and Yunnanozoon), and jaw- less craniates (Myllokunmingia, and its junior synonym Haikouichthys) over the 15 06_250317 part1-3.qxd 12/13/05 7:32 PM Page 16 16 Fishes of the World last few years that push the origins of these three major taxa at least into the Lower Cambrian (approximately 530–540 million years ago).
    [Show full text]
  • Application Dossier for the Proposed Black Country Global Geopark
    Application Dossier For the Proposed Black Country Global Geopark Page 7 Application Dossier For the Proposed Black Country Global Geopark A5 Application contact person The application contact person is Graham Worton. He can be contacted at the address given below. Dudley Museum and Art Gallery Telephone ; 0044 (0) 1384 815575 St James Road Fax; 0044 (0) 1384 815576 Dudley West Midlands Email; [email protected] England DY1 1HP Web Presence http://www.dudley.gov.uk/see-and-do/museums/dudley-museum-art-gallery/ http://www.blackcountrygeopark.org.uk/ and http://geologymatters.org.uk/ B. Geological Heritage B1 General geological description of the proposed Geopark The Black Country is situated in the centre of England adjacent to the city of Birmingham in the West Midlands (Figure. 1 page 2) .The current proposed geopark headquarters is Dudley Museum and Art Gallery which has the office of the geopark coordinator and hosts spectacular geological collections of local fossils. The geological galleries were opened by Charles Lapworth (founder of the Ordovician System) in 1912 and the museum carries out annual programmes of geological activities, exhibitions and events (see accompanying supporting information disc for additional detail). The museum now hosts a Black Country Geopark Project information point where the latest information about activities in the geopark area and information to support a visit to the geopark can be found. Figure. 7 A view across Stone Street Square Dudley to the Geopark Headquarters at Dudley Museum and Art Gallery For its size, the Black Country has some of the most diverse geology anywhere in the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Description of a New Osteostracan Species from Ukraine with a Brief Analysis of the Interrelationships of Scolenaspida
    Description of a new osteostracan species from Ukraine with a brief analysis of the interrelationships of Scolenaspida Anders Carlsson Degree project in biology, 2006 Examensarbete i biologi 20p, 2006 Institutionen för fysiologi och utvecklingsbiologi, Avdelningen för evolutionär organismbiologi Supervisor: Henning Blom Sammanfattning Under devonperioden (ca. 400-350 miljoner år sedan) levde många märkliga former av ryggradsdjur som inte har några nutida ättlingar. En av dessa grupper var osteostracerna, en form av käklösa fiskar som anses vara de närmaste släktingarna till käkförsedda fiskar. De bestod av en hästskoformad huvudsköld av ben, ofta försedd med bakåtböjda horn, och en fiskliknande bakkropp, täckt av ledade fjäll. Skölden hade ögon och en enda näsöppning på ovansidan, och munnen och flera par gälöppningar på undersidan . I mitt examensarbete beskrivs ett nytt släkte och art av osteostracerna, Voichyschynaspis longicornualis gen. et sp. nov. Beskrivningen är baserad på fossilt material hittat i Dniestrdalen i Ukraina. Detta nya släkte har likheter med släktena Zychaspis och Stensiopelta. För att testa det nya släktets plats i släktträdet görs en fylogenetisk analys tillsammans med dess närmaste släktingar, Zychaspis och Stensiopelta. Analysen försöker också reda ut släktskapsförhållandena mellan de båda andra släktenas arter. Voichyschynaspis visar sig vara närmast släkt med Stensiopelta, som visar sig vara monofyletiskt, det vill säga alla dess arter har en gemensam förfader. Zychaspis är mer problematiskt eftersom en av dess arter inte med säkerhet kan föras till det. 1 Description of a new osteostracan species from Ukraine with a brief analysis of the interrelationships of Scolenaspida ANDERS CARLSSON Biology Education Centre and Department of Developmental Biology and Comparative Physiology, Subdepartment of Evolutionary Organism Biology, Uppsala University Supervised by Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Family-Group Names of Fossil Fishes
    European Journal of Taxonomy 466: 1–167 ISSN 2118-9773 https://doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2018.466 www.europeanjournaloftaxonomy.eu 2018 · Van der Laan R. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. Monograph urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:1F74D019-D13C-426F-835A-24A9A1126C55 Family-group names of fossil fishes Richard VAN DER LAAN Grasmeent 80, 1357JJ Almere, The Netherlands. Email: [email protected] urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:55EA63EE-63FD-49E6-A216-A6D2BEB91B82 Abstract. The family-group names of animals (superfamily, family, subfamily, supertribe, tribe and subtribe) are regulated by the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature. Particularly, the family names are very important, because they are among the most widely used of all technical animal names. A uniform name and spelling are essential for the location of information. To facilitate this, a list of family- group names for fossil fishes has been compiled. I use the concept ‘Fishes’ in the usual sense, i.e., starting with the Agnatha up to the †Osteolepidiformes. All the family-group names proposed for fossil fishes found to date are listed, together with their author(s) and year of publication. The main goal of the list is to contribute to the usage of the correct family-group names for fossil fishes with a uniform spelling and to list the author(s) and date of those names. No valid family-group name description could be located for the following family-group names currently in usage: †Brindabellaspidae, †Diabolepididae, †Dorsetichthyidae, †Erichalcidae, †Holodipteridae, †Kentuckiidae, †Lepidaspididae, †Loganelliidae and †Pituriaspididae. Keywords. Nomenclature, ICZN, Vertebrata, Agnatha, Gnathostomata.
    [Show full text]
  • Some Attempts at Phylogeny of Early Vertebrates George M
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by University of Northern Iowa Proceedings of the Iowa Academy of Science Volume 60 | Annual Issue Article 96 1953 Some Attempts at Phylogeny of Early Vertebrates George M. Robertson Grinnell College Copyright © Copyright 1953 by the Iowa Academy of Science, Inc. Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.uni.edu/pias Recommended Citation Robertson, George M. (1953) "Some Attempts at Phylogeny of Early Vertebrates," Proceedings of the Iowa Academy of Science: Vol. 60: No. 1 , Article 96. Available at: https://scholarworks.uni.edu/pias/vol60/iss1/96 This Research is brought to you for free and open access by UNI ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Proceedings of the Iowa Academy of Science by an authorized editor of UNI ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Robertson: Some Attempts at Phylogeny of Early Vertebrates Some Attempts at Phylogeny of Early Vertebrates By GEORGE M. ROBERTSON There is an often-quoted reply of a mountain-climber to the question of his motives in mountain climbing. "Why do I want to climb that mountain?· Because it is there." The same char­ acteristic of curiosity has driven men to investigate all sorts of things aside from mountains, and in many, perhaps most, cases we make the same reply if we are really honest. So in paleontology one generally starts with the small-boy motive and some fortunate souls continue with it. They are the rock­ hounds, the human "pack-rats", like the famous Lauder Dick, the Baker of Thurso.
    [Show full text]
  • Silurian Vertebrate Remains from the Oslo Region, Norway, and Their Implications for Regional Biostratigraphy
    NORWEGIAN JOURNAL OF GEOLOGY Vol 99 Nr. 1 https://dx.doi.org/10.17850/njg99-1-07 Silurian vertebrate remains from the Oslo Region, Norway, and their implications for regional biostratigraphy Oskar Bremer1, Susan Turner2, Tiiu Märss3 & Henning Blom1 1Uppsala University, Department of Organismal Biology, Norbyvägen 18A, 752 36, Uppsala, Sweden. 2Honorary Research Fellow, Queensland Museum Geosciences, 122 Gerler Road, Hendra, Queensland 4011, Australia. 3Department of Geology at Tallinn University of Technology, Ehitajate tee 5, 19086 Tallinn, Estonia. E-mail corresponding author (Oskar Bremer): [email protected]. Several vertebrate assemblages are described from the Silurian of the Oslo Region, Norway, based on the review and revision of previous reports of microremains, as well as unpublished material from museum collections. Articulated thelodont specimens from the Rudstangen Fauna, Ringerike Group, are also described here for the first time, revealing a seemingly monogeneric loganelliid assemblage. The oldest assemblage (mid-Llandovery) only contains the thelodont Loganellia cf. aldridgei, while a single sample from upper Llandovery strata produced four Thelodus sp. scales. These scales share features with those from younger Thelodus taxa and give additional support to an early appearance of this genus. The mid-Wenlock faunas consist of thelodonts Loganellia grossi, Loganellia einari and Thelodus laevis. These are joined by the thelodont Paralogania martinssoni, anaspids Rhyncholepis parvula and cf. Pterygolepis nitida, as well as the osteostracans cf. Tyriaspis whitei and Osteostraci gen. et sp. indet. in late Wenlock and earliest Ludlow faunas. These complement the previously described anaspids and osteostracans of the Rudstangen Fauna based on articulated specimens. The faunas of a number of calcarenite samples collectively contain the thelodonts L.
    [Show full text]
  • Computational Fluid Dynamics Suggests Ecological Diversification
    Report Computational Fluid Dynamics Suggests Ecological Diversification among Stem-Gnathostomes Highlights Authors d Osteostracan headshield morphologies exhibit different Humberto G. Ferro´ n, hydrodynamic efficiencies Carlos Martı´nez-Perez, Imran A. Rahman, d Osteostracans had adaptations for passive control of water Vı´ctor Selles de Lucas, Hector Botella, flow around the body Philip C.J. Donoghue d Jawless stem-gnathostomes were ecologically diversified Correspondence d The origin of jaws was not the trigger for vertebrate ecological [email protected] (H.G.F.), diversification [email protected] (P.C.J.D.) In Brief Ferron et al. show, using computational fluid dynamics, that early jawless vertebrates were ecologically diversified and had complex hydrodynamic adaptations. These findings challenge the traditional scenario of jaws as the key evolutionary innovation that precipitated the ecological diversification of our ancestors. Ferro´ n et al., 2020, Current Biology 30, 1–6 December 7, 2020 ª 2020 Elsevier Inc. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2020.09.031 ll Please cite this article in press as: Ferro´ n et al., Computational Fluid Dynamics Suggests Ecological Diversification among Stem-Gnathostomes, Cur- rent Biology (2020), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2020.09.031 ll Report Computational Fluid Dynamics Suggests Ecological Diversification among Stem-Gnathostomes Humberto G. Ferro´ n,1,2,5,* Carlos Martı´nez-Perez, 1,2 Imran A. Rahman,3 Vı´ctor Selles de Lucas,4 Hector Botella,2 and Philip C.J. Donoghue1,* 1School of Earth
    [Show full text]
  • Lecture III.5B. Animals – III
    Lecture III.5b. Animals – III. The coelacanth, Latimeria chalumnae, the only living cros- sopterygian, was thought to be extinct until 1938. Coela- canths are descended from freshwater crossopterygians that returned to the sea. Prior to 1938, the last known coe- lacanth was from the late Cretaceous. Vertebrates. Four extant groups of verte- brates. 1. Agnatha – jawless fish. 2. Chondrichthyes – sharks and rays (cartilaginous). Simplified vertebrate phylog- eny. Red dots refer to pre- 3. Osteichthyes – bony fish. sumptive change in habitat. 4. Tetrapods – amphibians, reptiles, birds, mammals. a. Tetrapods evolved from a now extinct group of freshwater lobefin fish- es. b. Coelacanth, the only liv- ing lobefin, is secondari- Top. A typical Devonian ly marine. crossopterygian close to the ancestor of tetrapods. Bot- c. Previously thought to tom. The coelacanth, Latime- have died out at end of ria, a deep water marine form Cretaceous. and the only living repre- sentative of the group. 2 Myllokunmingia, a Cambrian jawless fish. 3 From Fish to Tetrapods. First vertebrates jawless. 1. Class Agnatha. 2. Principal fossil representa- tives belonged to the group called ostracoderms – ex- ternal boney armor. 3. Living forms called cyclo- Above. Ostracoderms. Note stomes (hagfish, lamprey) the armored heads. The pad- dles in Hemicyclaspis in back a. Lack bony skeletons. of the head shield evolved independently of the pectoral b. Special feeding struc- fins of modern fish. Below. tures for bottom scav- Business end of a living lam- enging (hagfish), and prey. blood sucking (lamprey - right). c. Lampreys have a ses- sile “ammocete” larva that resembles Amphi- oxus. 4 Above. Cyclostome manifest a combination of primitive and de- rived features.
    [Show full text]