Supplementary Information

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Supplementary Information 1 Supplementary information for “Bayesian Morphological Clock Methods Resurrect Placoderm Monophyly and Reveal Rapid Evolution in the Early History of Jawed Vertebrates.” Benedict King, Tuo Qiao, Michael S.Y. Lee, Min Zhu, John A. Long Contents 2-5 Figures S1-S4 6 Prior distributions 7-13 Taxon list 14 Stratigraphic ranges used in sampling test 15-63 Character list 64-70 Supplementary references 2 Figure S1. Weighted mean evolutionary rates in each time slice in a BEAST2 analysis in which placoderms are constrained to be paraphyletic. The overall pattern of rates is the same as the unconstrained analysis, with higher rates in the Silurian and a subsequent decline. 3 Figure S2. Weighted mean evolutionary rates in each time slice in a BEAST2 analysis in which certain taxa are given an age range rather than a fixed age. The overall pattern of rates is the same as in the focal analysis, with higher rates in the Silurian and a subsequent decline. 4 Figure S3. Weighted mean evolutionary rates in each time slice in a BEAST2 analysis in which all taxa occurring after the Frasnian are deleted. The overall pattern of rates is the same as in the focal analysis, with higher rates in the Silurian and a subsequent decline. 5 Figure S4. Comparison of rate heterogeneity patterns between a tree with placoderm monophyly (constrained) and placoderm paraphyly (constrained). This figure shows that the pattern in figure 6D was not an artefact of constraining the topology. A and B) Guide trees showing the branches on which rates of evolution would be expected to be affected between the two trees (A placoderm monophyly, B placoderm paraphyly). Both topologies were constrained such that the only difference is the root position. Dark grey branches (triangles) would be shortened in the paraphyly tree and black branches (diamonds) lengthened, thus increasing and decreasing rates respectively. Star (with arrow) indicates the root in placoderm paraphyly. C) The pattern of rate heterogeneity in the constrained placoderm monophyly tree resembles that of the unconstrained placoderm monophyly tree (fig. 6D). This shows that the pattern of rate heterogeneity in the constrained paraphyly tree is due to paraphyly and not an artefact of topological constraints. Single and double headed arrows indicate weighted and unweighted mean rates respectively. 6 Priors Origin: Uniform 0-1000 Birth Rate: Lognormal with mean (real space) 0.14 and standard deviation 0.9 The prior on birth rate matches the distribution rates found across living ray-finned fish (Rabosky et al. 2013). Death rate: Exponential with mean 0.1 Sampling rate: Exponential with mean 0.03 The proportion of known species included in the analysis can be used to place an upper bound on the sampling rate. (Sallan and Galimberti 2015) list 1124 Devonian-Mississippian taxa, said to be ~90% of named species, and 531 from the Lochkovian to the Frasnian. The dataset contains 107 and 97 taxa from taxa from these intervals respectively, placing an upper bound in the sampling proportion of between 0.0856. and 0.164. The exponential distribution employed here places the 97.5% quantile at 0.111. This amounts to an uninformative prior since the number of named species is still much lower than the true diversity. Gamma shape: Uniform 0-10 Mean rate: Exponential with mean 0.003 and offset 0.0016 The offset of the exponential sistribution is placed at the rate calculated by taking the mean number of steps per character from the parsimony analysis and dividing by the total branch length obtained when the parsimony tree is time-scaled in R using timePaleoPhy in the R package paleotree (Bapst 2012) with minimum ghost ranges. This provides a minimum rate estimate. The exponential is broad enough that the 95% quantile is at 0.0106, 6.3 times the estimated rate from parsimony. The median of this distribution is 0.0037, the rate generated by dividing the minimum estimate by the proportion of non-missing data. Ucld standard deviation: Exponential with mean 1 7 Taxa, sources formations and age used in analysis Taxon Source(s) Formation Age for analysis Hemicyclaspis (Stensiö 1932) Ludlow, Shropshire. 421 murchisoni Downtownian (Pridoli) Zenaspis salweyi (Stensiö 1932) Lower old red 412 sandstone. Skirrid Fawr, Senni/St Maughans formation Cephalaspis lyelli (Stensiö 1932, White Lower old red 412 1958) sandstone, Glammis Benneviaspis (Janvier 1985a) Ben Nevis formation, 413 holtedahli Red bay group. Boreaspis (Janvier 1985a) Wood bay formation 411 macrorhynchus Norselaspis glacialis (Janvier 1981) Wood bay formation 411 Nectaspis areolate (Wängsjö 1952, Janvier Wood bay formation 411 1981) Procephalaspis (Robertson 1939, Saaremaa, Estonia. 427 oeselensis Denison 1951, Janvier Wenlockian and 1985b) Ludlowian Tremataspis (Robertson 1938a, Saaremaa 427 mammillata Robertson 1938b, Denison 1947, Denison 1951, Janvier 1985b) Waengsjoeaspis (Wängsjö 1952, Janvier Fraenkelryggen 416 excellens 1985a) formation Escuminaspis laticeps (Janvier et al. 2004) Escuminac formation 380 Eugaleaspis changi (Liu 1965, Zhu and Gai Xitun formation, 412 2007) Liaojaoshan Hanyangaspis (Zhu and Gai 2007) Guodingshan 436 guodingshanensis formation. Telychian Polybranchiaspis (Liu 1965, Liu 1975) Xishancun and Xitun 415 liaojiaoshanensis formations Bannhuanaspis (Janvier et al. 1993) Bac Bun formation 411 vukhuci Wenshanaspis (Zhao et al. 2001) Posongchong 409 zhichangensis formation, Wenshan. Pragian Shuyu zhejiangensis (Gai et al. 2011) Maoshan formation. 433 Late Telychian to early Wenlock Polybranchiaspid sp. (Wang et al. 2005) Xishancun and Xitun 415 (histological samples) formations Yunnanolepis sp. (Zhang 1980, Zhu 1996) Xishancun and Xitun 415 (various taxa from formations same formations) Parayunnanolepis (Zhang et al. 2001, Zhu Xitun formation 412 xitunensis et al. 2012) 8 Microbrachius dicki (Hemmings 1978, Long Eday flagstone and 386 et al. 2015) John O’Groats sandstone. Lower- Middle Givetian Bothriolepis sp. (Young 1984) Gogo formation 383 MVP230985 Bothriolepis (Downs and Donoghue Escuminac formation 380 canadensis 2009, Béchard et al. 2014) Pterichthyodes milleri (Hemmings 1978) Achanarras horizon, 389 under upper Stromness flagst. Late Eifelian Remigolepis walkeri (Johanson 1997) Canowindra. 366 Famennian Diandongpetalichthys (Zhu 1991) Xishancun formation 417 liaojiaoshanensis Quasipetalichthys (Liu 1991) Kunming; Shixiagou 385 haikouensis formation, Ninxia. Givetian Eurycaraspis incilis (Liu 1991) Haikou formation. 385 Givetian Lunaspis broili (Gross 1961) Hunsrueck slate. Late 408 Pragian to early Emsian Macropetalichthys (Stensiö 1925, Stensiö Onondaga limetone. 390 rapheidolabis. 1963b, Stensiö 1969) Eifelian (including Macropetalichthys sp. specimens used in 1963 and 1969) Wuttagoonaspis (Ritchie 1973, Miles and Mulga Downs group. 393 fletcheri Young 1977). Emsian-Eifelian AMF53610, AMF53631, AMF53591, Groenlandaspis sp. MVP48873(AMF59808) , Mt. Howitt 385 AMF59814, MVP48877/8 (AMF59811/2), AMF62534A, AMF59809 Cowralepis mclachlani (Ritchie 2005, Carr et al. Merriganowry shale. 383 2009) Late Givetian to early Frasnian Gavinaspis convergens (Dupret et al. 2009) Xitun formation. 412 Sigaspis lepidophora (Goujet 1973) Wood bay formation 412 (extreme base) Kujdanowiaspis (Stensiö 1963a, Dupret Dnister series, Podolia. 411 podolica 2010) Upper Lockhovian- lower Pragian Dicksonosteus arcticus (Goujet 1975, Goujet Wood bay formation 411 1984) 9 Buchanosteus (Burrow and Turner Buchan. Mid-late 408 confertituberculatus 1998, Long et al. 2014) Pragian Parabuchanosteus (White and Toombs Taemas-Wee Jasper 401 murrumbidgeensis 1972, Young 1979, Burrow and Turner 1998) Holonema westolli (Miles 1971) Gogo formation 383 Coccosteus cuspidatus (Miles and Westoll Achanarras and 388 1968) edderton fish bed. Eifelian-Givetain boundary Incisoscutum ritchiei (Dennis and Miles 1981, Gogo formation 383 Giles et al. 2013) Eastmanosteus (Dennis-Bryan 1987) Gogo formation 383 calliaspis Compagopiscis (Gardiner and Miles Gogo formation 383 croucheri 1994) Materpiscis (Long et al. 2008, Gogo formation 383 attenboroughi Trinajstic et al. 2012) Austroptyctodus (Long 1997a) Gogo Formation 383 gardineri Campbellodus (Long 1997a) Gogo formation 383 decipiens Rhamphodopsis (Miles 1967, Long Edderton fish beds. 388 threiplandi 1997b) Eifelian-Givetian boundary Brindabellaspis (Young 1980). Taemas-Wee Jasper 401 stensioi ANUV3247 Romundina stellina (Ørvig 1975, Dupret et Lockhovian. Prince of 415 al. 2014) Wales island. Jagorina pandora (Stensiö 1969, Young Kellwasserkalk, Bad 375 1986) Wildungen. Late Frasnian Gemuendina stuertzi (Gross 1963) Hunsrueck slate 408 Entelognathus (Zhu et al. 2013) Kuanti formation 424 primordialis Janusiscus schultzei (Giles et al. 2015b) Lower member, 415 Kureika formation. Middle Lockhovian. Ramirosuarezia (Pradel et al. 2009) Icla formation. Early 392 boliviana Eifelian Acanthodes bronni (Gross 1935, Watson Lebach ironstone. 298 1937, Miles 1973b, Early Permian Miles 1973a, Coates 1994, Davis et al. 2012, Brazeau and de Winter 2015) Brachyacanthus (Watson 1937) Lower old red 415 scutiger sandstone, Farnell. Lockhovian 10 Brochoadmones milesi (Hanke and Wilson MOTH 415 2006) Cassidiceps (Gagnier and Wilson MOTH 415 vermiculatus 1996) Cheiracanthus (Watson 1937, Miles Middle old red 388 latus/murchisoni 1973a) sandstone, Moray firth. Nodular fish beds, Eifelian-Givetian Climatius reticulatus (Watson 1937, Miles ‘Turin hill’ 415 1973a) Culmacanthus stewarti (Long 1983) Mt Howitt 385 Euthacanthus (Watson 1937, Miles ‘Turin hill’ 415 macnicoli
Recommended publications
  • Climatic-Niche Evolution with Key Morphological Innovations Across
    Climatic-niche evolution with key morphological innovations across clades within Scutiger boulengeri (Anura: Megophryidae) Xiuqin Lin1, Chungkun Shih2, Yinmeng Hou1, Xiaoxiao Shu1, Meihua Zhang1, Junhua Hu1, Jiangping JIANG1, and Feng Xie1 1Chengdu Institute of Biology 2Capital Normal University March 9, 2021 Abstract The studies of climatic-niche shifts over evolutionary time accompanied by key morphological innovations have attracted the interest of many researchers recently. We analyzed the realized niche dynamics across clades within Scutiger boulengeri using ecological niche models (ENMs), ordination method (environment principal component analysis; PCA-env), and correspondingly key morphological innovations combined phylogenetic comparative methods (PCMs) and phylogenetic generalized least squares (PGLS) regression methods throughout their distributions in Qinghai-Tibet Plateau (QTP) margins of China in Asia. Our analyses reveal that there is obvious niche divergence caused by niche expansion across S. boulengeri clades, especially in E. A, E. B and partial of E. C clades. Moreover, niche expansion is more popular than niche unfilling into novel environmental conditions. Annual mean temperature and Annual precipitation are the most important contributors in E. A and E. B clades, while Precipitation of driest month is most likely to be the leading limited factor in these two regions according to jackknife test of variable importance. In addition, we identified several key ecological and morphological traits that tend to be associated with niche expansion in S. boulengeri clades correspondingly. Specifically, we found that Elevation, Isothermality, Mean diurnal range and Max temperature of warmest month are significantly negative predictors of snout{vent length (SVL) under phylogenetic models, while the S. boulengeri toads from warmer and more arid environments tend to be larger.
    [Show full text]
  • Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-17944-8 — Evolution And
    Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-17944-8 — Evolution and Development of Fishes Edited by Zerina Johanson , Charlie Underwood , Martha Richter Index More Information Index abaxial muscle,33 Alizarin red, 110 arandaspids, 5, 61–62 abdominal muscles, 212 Alizarin red S whole mount staining, 127 Arandaspis, 5, 61, 69, 147 ability to repair fractures, 129 Allenypterus, 253 arcocentra, 192 Acanthodes, 14, 79, 83, 89–90, 104, 105–107, allometric growth, 129 Arctic char, 130 123, 152, 152, 156, 213, 221, 226 alveolar bone, 134 arcualia, 4, 49, 115, 146, 191, 206 Acanthodians, 3, 7, 13–15, 18, 23, 29, 63–65, Alx, 36, 47 areolar calcification, 114 68–69, 75, 79, 82, 84, 87–89, 91, 99, 102, Amdeh Formation, 61 areolar cartilage, 192 104–106, 114, 123, 148–149, 152–153, ameloblasts, 134 areolar mineralisation, 113 156, 160, 189, 192, 195, 198–199, 207, Amia, 154, 185, 190, 193, 258 Areyongalepis,7,64–65 213, 217–218, 220 ammocoete, 30, 40, 51, 56–57, 176, 206, 208, Argentina, 60–61, 67 Acanthodiformes, 14, 68 218 armoured agnathans, 150 Acanthodii, 152 amphiaspids, 5, 27 Arthrodira, 12, 24, 26, 28, 74, 82–84, 86, 194, Acanthomorpha, 20 amphibians, 1, 20, 150, 172, 180–182, 245, 248, 209, 222 Acanthostega, 22, 155–156, 255–258, 260 255–256 arthrodires, 7, 11–13, 22, 28, 71–72, 74–75, Acanthothoraci, 24, 74, 83 amphioxus, 49, 54–55, 124, 145, 155, 157, 159, 80–84, 152, 192, 207, 209, 212–213, 215, Acanthothoracida, 11 206, 224, 243–244, 249–250 219–220 acanthothoracids, 7, 12, 74, 81–82, 211, 215, Amphioxus, 120 Ascl,36 219 Amphystylic, 148 Asiaceratodus,21
    [Show full text]
  • Categorical Versus Geometric Morphometric Approaches To
    [Palaeontology, 2020, pp. 1–16] CATEGORICAL VERSUS GEOMETRIC MORPHOMETRIC APPROACHES TO CHARACTERIZING THE EVOLUTION OF MORPHOLOGICAL DISPARITY IN OSTEOSTRACI (VERTEBRATA, STEM GNATHOSTOMATA) by HUMBERTO G. FERRON 1,2* , JENNY M. GREENWOOD1, BRADLEY DELINE3,CARLOSMARTINEZ-PEREZ 1,2,HECTOR BOTELLA2, ROBERT S. SANSOM4,MARCELLORUTA5 and PHILIP C. J. DONOGHUE1,* 1School of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Life Sciences Building, Tyndall Avenue, Bristol, BS8 1TQ, UK; [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] 2Institut Cavanilles de Biodiversitat i Biologia Evolutiva, Universitat de Valencia, C/ Catedratic Jose Beltran Martınez 2, 46980, Paterna, Valencia, Spain; [email protected], [email protected] 3Department of Geosciences, University of West Georgia, Carrollton, GA 30118, USA; [email protected] 4School of Earth & Environmental Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PT, UK; [email protected] 5School of Life Sciences, University of Lincoln, Riseholme Hall, Lincoln, LN2 2LG, UK; [email protected] *Corresponding authors Typescript received 2 October 2019; accepted in revised form 27 February 2020 Abstract: Morphological variation (disparity) is almost aspects of morphology. Phylomorphospaces reveal conver- invariably characterized by two non-mutually exclusive gence towards a generalized ‘horseshoe’-shaped cranial mor- approaches: (1) quantitatively, through geometric morpho- phology and two strong trends involving major groups of metrics;
    [Show full text]
  • A Late Permian Ichthyofauna from the Zechstein Basin, Lithuania-Latvia Region
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/554998; this version posted February 20, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license. 1 A late Permian ichthyofauna from the Zechstein Basin, Lithuania-Latvia Region 2 3 Darja Dankina-Beyer1*, Andrej Spiridonov1,4, Ģirts Stinkulis2, Esther Manzanares3, 4 Sigitas Radzevičius1 5 6 1 Department of Geology and Mineralogy, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania 7 2 Chairman of Bedrock Geology, Faculty of Geography and Earth Sciences, University 8 of Latvia, Riga, Latvia 9 3 Department of Botany and Geology, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain 10 4 Laboratory of Bedrock Geology, Nature Research Centre, Vilnius, Lithuania 11 12 *[email protected] (DD-B) 13 14 Abstract 15 The late Permian is a transformative time, which ended in one of the most 16 significant extinction events in Earth’s history. Fish assemblages are a major 17 component of marine foods webs. The macroevolution and biogeographic patterns of 18 late Permian fish are currently insufficiently known. In this contribution, the late Permian 19 fish fauna from Kūmas quarry (southern Latvia) is described for the first time. As a 20 result, the studied late Permian Latvian assemblage consisted of isolated 21 chondrichthyan teeth of Helodus sp., ?Acrodus sp., ?Omanoselache sp. and 22 euselachian type dermal denticles as well as many osteichthyan scales of the 23 Haplolepidae and Elonichthydae; numerous teeth of Palaeoniscus, rare teeth findings of 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/554998; this version posted February 20, 2019.
    [Show full text]
  • Flow Mechanism and Simulation Approaches for Shale Gas Reservoirs: a Review
    Flow Mechanism and Simulation Approaches for Shale Gas Reservoirs: A Review Item Type Article Authors Zhang, Tao; Sun, Shuyu; Song, Hongqing Citation Zhang T, Sun S, Song H (2018) Flow Mechanism and Simulation Approaches for Shale Gas Reservoirs: A Review. Transport in Porous Media. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/ s11242-018-1148-5. Eprint version Post-print DOI 10.1007/s11242-018-1148-5 Publisher Springer Nature Journal Transport in Porous Media Rights Archived with thanks to Transport in Porous Media Download date 06/10/2021 20:33:37 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10754/629903 Flow mechanism and simulation approaches for shale gas reservoirs: A review Tao Zhang1 Shuyu Sun1∗ Hongqing Song1;2∗ 1Computational Transport Phenomena Laboratory(CTPL), Division of Physical Sciences and Engineering (PSE), King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Thuwal 23955-6900, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia 2 School of civil and resource engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, 30 Xueyuan Rd, Beijing 100085, People's Republic of China Abstract The past two decades have borne remarkable progress in our understanding of flow mechanisms and numerical simulation approaches of shale gas reservoir, with much larger the number of publications in recent five years compared to that before year 2012. In this paper, a review is constructed with three parts: flow mecha- nism, reservoir models and numerical approaches. In mechanism, it is found that gas adsorption process can be concluded into different isotherm models for various reservoir basins. Multi-component adsorption mechanism are taken into account in recent years. Flow mechanism and equations vary with different Knudsen number, which could be figured out in two ways: Molecular Dynamics (MD) and Lattice Boltzmann Method (LBM).
    [Show full text]
  • Geological Survey of Ohio
    GEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF OHIO. VOL. I.—PART II. PALÆONTOLOGY. SECTION II. DESCRIPTIONS OF FOSSIL FISHES. BY J. S. NEWBERRY. Digital version copyrighted ©2012 by Don Chesnut. THE CLASSIFICATION AND GEOLOGICAL DISTRIBUTION OF OUR FOSSIL FISHES. So little is generally known in regard to American fossil fishes, that I have thought the notes which I now give upon some of them would be more interesting and intelligible if those into whose hands they will fall could have a more comprehensive view of this branch of palæontology than they afford. I shall therefore preface the descriptions which follow with a few words on the geological distribution of our Palæozoic fishes, and on the relations which they sustain to fossil forms found in other countries, and to living fishes. This seems the more necessary, as no summary of what is known of our fossil fishes has ever been given, and the literature of the subject is so scattered through scientific journals and the proceedings of learned societies, as to be practically inaccessible to most of those who will be readers of this report. I. THE ZOOLOGICAL RELATIONS OF OUR FOSSIL FISHES. To the common observer, the class of Fishes seems to be well defined and quite distin ct from all the other groups o f vertebrate animals; but the comparative anatomist finds in certain unusual and aberrant forms peculiarities of structure which link the Fishes to the Invertebrates below and Amphibians above, in such a way as to render it difficult, if not impossible, to draw the lines sharply between these great groups.
    [Show full text]
  • The Distribution of Reptiles and Amphibians in the Annapurna-Dhaulagiri Region (Nepal)
    THE DISTRIBUTION OF REPTILES AND AMPHIBIANS IN THE ANNAPURNA-DHAULAGIRI REGION (NEPAL) by LURLY M.R. NANHOE and PAUL E. OUBOTER L.M.R. Nanhoe & P.E. Ouboter: The distribution of reptiles and amphibians in the Annapurna-Dhaulagiri region (Nepal). Zool. Verh. Leiden 240, 12-viii-1987: 1-105, figs. 1-16, tables 1-5, app. I-II. — ISSN 0024-1652. Key words: reptiles; amphibians; keys; Annapurna region; Dhaulagiri region; Nepal; altitudinal distribution; zoogeography. The reptiles and amphibians of the Annapurna-Dhaulagiri region in Nepal are keyed and described. Their distribution is recorded, based on both personal observations and literature data. The ecology of the species is discussed. The zoogeography and the altitudinal distribution are analysed. All in all 32 species-group taxa of reptiles and 21 species-group taxa of amphibians are treated. L.M.R. Nanhoe & P.E. Ouboter, c/o Rijksmuseum van Natuurlijke Historie Raamsteeg 2, Postbus 9517, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands. CONTENTS Introduction 5 Study area 7 Climate and vegetation 9 Material and methods 12 Reptilia 13 Sauria 13 Gekkonidae 13 Hemidactylus brookii 14 Hemidactylus flaviviridis 14 Hemidactylus garnotii 15 Agamidae 15 Agama tuberculata 16 Calotes versicolor 18 Japalura major 19 Japalura tricarinata 20 Phrynocephalus theobaldi 22 Scincidae 24 Scincella capitanea 25 Scincella ladacensis ladacensis 26 3 4 ZOOLOGISCHE VERHANDELINGEN 240 (1987) Scincella ladacensis himalayana 27 2g Scincella sikimmensis ^ Sphenomorphus maculatus ^ Serpentes ^ Colubridae ^ Amphiesma platyceps ^
    [Show full text]
  • Proposed Black Country UNESCO Global Geopark
    Great things to see and do in the Proposed Black Country UNESCO Global Geopark Black Country UNESCO Global Geopark Project The layers lying above these are grey muddy Welcome to the world-class rocks that contain seams of ironstone, fireclay heritage which is the Black and coal with lots of fossils of plants and insects. These rocks tell us of a time some 310 million Country years ago (called the Carboniferous Period, The Black Country is an amazing place with a named after the carbon in the coal) when the captivating history spanning hundreds of Black Country was covered in huge steamy millions of years. This is a geological and cultural rainforests. undiscovered treasure of the UK, located at the Sitting on top of those we find reddish sandy heart of the country. It is just 30 minutes from rocks containing ancient sand dunes and Birmingham International Airport and 10 minutes pebbly river beds. This tells us that the landscape by train from the city of Birmingham. dried out to become a scorching desolate The Black Country is where many essential desert (this happened about 250 million years aspects of the Industrial Revolution began. It ago and lasted through the Permian and Triassic was the world’s first large scale industrial time periods). landscape where anything could be made, The final chapter in the making of our landscape earning it the nick-name the ‘workshop of the is often called the’ Ice Age’. It spans the last 2.6 world’ during the Industrial Revolution. This million years of our history when vast ice sheets short guidebook introduces some of the sites scraped across the surface of the area, leaving and features that are great things to see and a landscaped sculpted by ice and carved into places to explore across many parts of The the hills and valleys we see today.
    [Show full text]
  • Fossil Jawless Fish from China Foreshadows Early Jawed Vertebrate Anatomy
    LETTER doi:10.1038/nature10276 Fossil jawless fish from China foreshadows early jawed vertebrate anatomy Zhikun Gai1,2, Philip C. J. Donoghue1, Min Zhu2, Philippe Janvier3 & Marco Stampanoni4,5 Most living vertebrates are jawed vertebrates (gnathostomes), and The new genus is erected for ‘Sinogaleaspis’ zhejiangensis23,24 Pan, 1986, the living jawless vertebrates (cyclostomes), hagfishes and lampreys, from the Maoshan Formation (late Llandovery epoch to early Wenlock provide scarce information about the profound reorganization of epoch, Silurian period, ,430 million years ago) of Zhejiang, China. the vertebrate skull during the evolutionary origin of jaws1–9. The Diagnosis. Small galeaspid (Supplementary Figs 6 and 7) distinct from extinct bony jawless vertebrates, or ‘ostracoderms’, are regarded as Sinogaleaspis in its terminally positioned nostril, posterior supraorbital precursors of jawed vertebrates and provide insight into this form- sensory canals not converging posteriorly, median dorsal sensory ative episode in vertebrate evolution8–14. Here, using synchrotron canals absent, only one median transverse sensory canal and six pairs radiation X-ray tomography15,16, we describe the cranial anatomy of of lateral transverse sensory canals17,23. galeaspids, a 435–370-million-year-old ‘ostracoderm’ group from Description of cranial anatomy. To elucidate the gross cranial ana- China and Vietnam17. The paired nasal sacs of galeaspids are located tomy of galeaspids, we used synchrotron radiation X-ray tomographic anterolaterally in the braincase,
    [Show full text]
  • Global Catfish Biodiversity 17
    American Fisheries Society Symposium 77:15–37, 2011 © 2011 by the American Fisheries Society Global Catfi sh Biodiversity JONATHAN W. ARMBRUSTER* Department of Biological Sciences, Auburn University 331 Funchess, Auburn University, Alabama 36849, USA Abstract.—Catfi shes are a broadly distributed order of freshwater fi shes with 3,407 cur- rently valid species. In this paper, I review the different clades of catfi shes, all catfi sh fami- lies, and provide information on some of the more interesting aspects of catfi sh biology that express the great diversity that is present in the order. I also discuss the results of the widely successful All Catfi sh Species Inventory Project. Introduction proximately 10.8% of all fi shes and 5.5% of all ver- tebrates are catfi shes. Renowned herpetologist and ecologist Archie Carr’s But would every one be able to identify the 1941 parody of dichotomous keys, A Subjective Key loricariid catfi sh Pseudancistrus pectegenitor as a to the Fishes of Alachua County, Florida, begins catfi sh (Figure 2A)? It does not have scales, but it with “Any damn fool knows a catfi sh.” Carr is right does have bony plates. It is very fl at, and its mouth but only in part. Catfi shes (the Siluriformes) occur has long jaws but could not be called large. There is on every continent (even fossils are known from a barbel, but you might not recognize it as one as it Antarctica; Figure 1); and the order is extremely is just a small extension of the lip. There are spines well supported by numerous complex synapomor- at the front of the dorsal and pectoral fi ns, but they phies (shared, derived characteristics; Fink and are not sharp like in the typical catfi sh.
    [Show full text]
  • Fins, Limbs, and Tails: Outgrowths and Axial Patterning in Vertebrate Evolution Michael I
    Review articles Fins, limbs, and tails: outgrowths and axial patterning in vertebrate evolution Michael I. Coates1* and Martin J. Cohn2 Summary Current phylogenies show that paired fins and limbs are unique to jawed verte- brates and their immediate ancestry. Such fins evolved first as a single pair extending from an anterior location, and later stabilized as two pairs at pectoral and pelvic levels. Fin number, identity, and position are therefore key issues in vertebrate developmental evolution. Localization of the AP levels at which develop- mental signals initiate outgrowth from the body wall may be determined by Hox gene expression patterns along the lateral plate mesoderm. This regionalization appears to be regulated independently of that in the paraxial mesoderm and axial skeleton. When combined with current hypotheses of Hox gene phylogenetic and functional diversity, these data suggest a new model of fin/limb developmental evolution. This coordinates body wall regions of outgrowth with primitive bound- aries established in the gut, as well as the fundamental nonequivalence of pectoral and pelvic structures. BioEssays 20:371–381, 1998. ௠ 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Introduction over and again to exemplify fundamental concepts in biological Vertebrate appendages include an amazing diversity of form, theory. The striking uniformity of teleost pectoral fin skeletons from the huge wing-like fins of manta rays or the stumpy limbs of illustrated Geoffroy Saint-Hilair’s discussion of ‘‘special analo- frogfishes, to ichthyosaur paddles, the extraordinary fingers of gies,’’1 while tetrapod limbs exemplified Owen’s2 related concept aye-ayes, and the fin-like wings of penguins. The functional of ‘‘homology’’; Darwin3 then employed precisely the same ex- diversity of these appendages is similarly vast and, in addition to ample as evidence of evolutionary descent from common ances- various modes of locomotion, fins and limbs are also used for try.
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Clocks Provide New Insights Into the Evolutionary History of Galeichthyine Sea Catfishes
    ORIGINAL ARTICLE doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00640.x MOLECULAR CLOCKS PROVIDE NEW INSIGHTS INTO THE EVOLUTIONARY HISTORY OF GALEICHTHYINE SEA CATFISHES Ricardo Betancur-R.1,2 and Jonathan W. Armbruster1 1Department of Biological Sciences, Auburn University, 331 Funchess Hall, Auburn, Alabama 36849 2E-mail: [email protected] Received August 28, 2008 Accepted January 7, 2009 Intercontinental distributions in the southern hemisphere can either be the result of Gondwanan vicariance or more recent transoceanic dispersal. Transoceanic dispersal has come into vogue for explaining many intercontinental distributions; however, it has been used mainly for organisms that can float or raft between the continents. Despite their name, the Sea Catfishes (Ariidae) have limited dispersal ability, and there are no examples of nearshore ariid genera with a transoceanic distribution except for Galeichthys where three species occur in southern Africa and one in the Peruvian coast. A previous study suggested that the group originated in Gondwana, and that the species arrived at their current range after the breakup of the supercontinent in the Early Cretaceous. To test this hypothesis, we infer molecular phylogenies (mitochondrial cytochrome b, ATP synthase 8/6, 12S, and 16S; nuclear rag2; total ∼4 kb) and estimate intercontinental divergence via molecular clocks (penalized-likelihood, Bayesian relaxed clock, and universal clock rates in fishes). Age ranges for cladogenesis of African and South American lineages are 15.4–2.5 my, far more recent than would be suggested by Gondwanan vicariance; thus, the distribution of galeichthyines must be explained by dispersal or more recent vicariant events. The nested position of the Peruvian species (Galeichthys peruvianus) within the African taxa is robust, suggesting that the direction of the dispersal was from Africa to South America.
    [Show full text]