
University of Groningen Fish microfossils from the Upper Silurian Öved Sandstone Formation, Skåne, southern Sweden Vergoossen, Johannes Marie Josephus IMPORTANT NOTE: You are advised to consult the publisher's version (publisher's PDF) if you wish to cite from it. Please check the document version below. Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Publication date: 2003 Link to publication in University of Groningen/UMCG research database Citation for published version (APA): Vergoossen, J. M. J. (2003). Fish microfossils from the Upper Silurian Öved Sandstone Formation, Skåne, southern Sweden. s.n. Copyright Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). The publication may also be distributed here under the terms of Article 25fa of the Dutch Copyright Act, indicated by the “Taverne” license. More information can be found on the University of Groningen website: https://www.rug.nl/library/open-access/self-archiving-pure/taverne- amendment. Take-down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Downloaded from the University of Groningen/UMCG research database (Pure): http://www.rug.nl/research/portal. For technical reasons the number of authors shown on this cover page is limited to 10 maximum. Download date: 04-10-2021 9 FISH MICROFOSSILS FROM THE UPPER SILURIAN ÖVED SANDSTONE FORMATION, SKÅNE, SOUTHERN SWEDEN. Chapter 1 Fish microfossils from Helvetesgraven (I) (Published in Geologie & Mijnbouw, 78: 267-280, 1999) A contribution to IGCP 406 Circum-Arctic Palaeozoic Vertebrates Abstract. The fauna comprises scales of jawless fishes (rare osteostracans, and the thelodonts Thelodus parvidens, ‘T. traquairi’, T. sculptilis, T. admirabilis and ‘Loganellia cuneata’) and of Gnathostomata (the acanthodians Nostolepis striata, Gomphonchus sandelensis, Poracanthodes? lehmani sp. nov. and Poracanthodes cf. punctatus, tesserae of the head and other ‘specialised elements’ of the squamation; and the osteichthyan Andreolepis hedei). The fauna is as old as, or slightly younger than, those from the complex of sedimentary rocks along the Anglo-Central Urals margin of the Laurussian continent affected by the Ludfordian A. hedei Event. This event marks the transition between the hedei and sculptilis Zones of the Microvertebrate Standard Zonation and can be correlated with the snajdri Conodont Interval Zone. The evidence favours a simultaneous paleogeographical appearance of the punctatiform and porosiform poracanthodid acanthodians within the Baltica region of Laurussia. [Text-] Figure 1. Geological map of Skåne (simplified after Jeppsson & Laufeld 1986: fig. 5). Introduction The fauna of an unregistered residue sample from ‘Övedskloster’, kept in the Naturhistoriska Riksmuseet, Palaeozoology section, Stockholm (NRS), is listed. The geographical reference to 10 Övedskloster is probably a less accurate indication for the second quarry at Helvetesgraven (see below). The biostratigraphical implications of the fauna are discussed and a comparison is made with the fauna from ‘Övedskloster’ described by Lehman (1937). Paleontological comments and brief descriptions are included, but complementary details will be published later. The outcrops at Helvetesgraven (Text-fig. 1) and adjacent localities are in the Lower Pridoli Öved Sandstone Formation, which is part of the Upper Silurian Öved-Ramsåsa Group (Jeppsson & Laufeld 1986).The Öved Sandstone Fm. comprises sandstones, shales and subordinate thin limestone bands with marine faunas, in which the increasing importance of the bivalves indicates a shallowing upwards (Jeppsson & Laufeld 1986). The type locality is the second quarry at Helvetesgraven, which has been filled with water for decades. Reddish sandstone is still exposed in a few small sections. Pieces of bone-bed from the dump piles at the quarry were placed in the Ligonodina elegans Conodont Zone by Jeppsson (1974; 1982; this volume, Chapter 4: Chart 1). In Skåne this zone represents the youngest Silurian. Within this zone Jeppsson (1974; see also Jeppsson & Laufeld 1986) distinguished a local fauna with Hindeodella steinhornensis new subspecies 2 on the basis of the conodonts from Helvetesgraven. This local zone represents a fauna that Jeppsson (1974: 12 & table 1) considered slightly less “advanced” than the one from his sample Ramsåsa F 66. The unregistered residue of which I studied the fish fauna, was labelled Övedskloster in T. Ørvig's handwriting and was kept in the cabinet where Ørvig's thin sections and other residue samples are stored in the NRS. The sample contained few loose, red sediment particles, and reddish white fossils sometimes with particles of sediment adhering to them. I assume that the rock which yielded the fish remains was collected at the type locality. The printed stickers on the pieces of rock in the NRS collection bear the combined site name Övedskloster-Helvetesgraven. The problems related to collecting from the outcrops at Helvetesgraven were summed up by Jeppsson & Laufeld (1986). Ørvig may have received the residue or rock sample from a source outside the NRS. No notes relating to the residue could be traced in the NRS. Most of the samples for the study of the Scanian fish fauna by Lehman (1937) were collected by Stensiö in 1924. Lehman’s material from Övedskloster came from the second quarry at Helvetesgraven (Jeppsson & Laufeld 1986; cf. Lehman 1937: 9). For these reasons I shall refer to Helvetesgraven as the site that yielded the faunas. Since Lehman (1937: 5) stated that a small part of his material had been collected by Grönwall, or even before Grönwall, it cannot be entirely excluded that samples from other outcrops in the vicinity were involved. History of fish research Lehman (1937) described the Late Silurian microvertebrate fauna from Helvetesgraven in combination with that from nearby Ramsåsa (Figure 1). He compared the two faunas by their lists of taxa (Lehman 1937: 86-88) and by the number of identified scales (op. cit.: 33, 56-57). His taxa were based on a total of c. 368 thelodont and acanthodian scales from both localities, as well as spines, teeth and other remains. The faunal list for Helvetesgraven is about 50% shorter (26 taxa, including 6 possible occurrences; a total of c. 56 scales) than that for Ramsåsa (53 taxa, including 3 possible occurrences; a total of 312 scales). Lehman (1937: 82) remarked that the acanthodians were better represented than thelodonts at Helvetesgraven, whereas it was just the other way round at Ramsåsa. Lehman (1937: 86-88) listed the following taxa from Helvetesgraven: thelodont scales (11, assigned to 8 scale taxa): Thelodus laevis Pander aff. planus, T. glaber Pander, T. parvidens Agassiz; the presence of the following 5 taxa was uncertain: T. laevis, T. carinatus Pander, T. schmidti Pander, T. goebeli Pander and T. trilobatus Hoppe (large variation); acanthodian scales (45, assigned to 9 taxa): Gomphodus sandelensis Pander, Poracanthodes margaritatus Lehman, Diplacanthoides compressus Lehman, D. furcatus Brotzen, D. insignis Brotzen, D. multicostatus Lehman; the presence of the following 3 taxa was possible: Gomphodus volborthi Rohon, Diplacanthoides elegans Brotzen and D. sinuosus Lehman; acanthodian spine taxa (5): Onchus 11 murchisoni Agassiz, O. tenuistriatus Agassiz, O. roemeri Hoppe, O. curvatus Pander and Onchus? brotzeni Lehman. In addition, the presence of cyathaspid, cephalaspid and arthrodire remains, as well as the possible presence of elasmobranch teeth, were recorded. Lehman's taxon names will be discussed below. Turner (1984) mentioned a sample from the “Övedskloster sandstone from Helvetesgraven” yielding one ostracode, the thelodonts Thelodus parvidens, Loganella ludlowiensis Gross, Loganella sp., and acanthodian scales. As a rule, in post Second World War biostratigraphical evaluations, the fish fauna from Helvetesgraven was not treated separately from that of Ramsåsa (e.g. Märss 1986b, text-fig. 46). Lehman's nomenclature: the taxa from Helvetesgraven None of the scales described and illustrated from the Helvetesgraven site by Lehman (1937) have been traced in the NRS collection. A comparison of his material with the new material can therefore be made only on the basis of his text and illustrations. Only Lehman’s (1937) figures 55- 63 (acanthodian scales), 77 (acanthodian teeth), 83-84 (acanthodian spines) show the morphology of material from Helvetesgraven. Turner (1976, 1984: table 5.2) was the first fish researcher who tried to assess and update Lehman's nomenclature for the thelodonts. Of the taxa found with certainty at Helvetesgraven, she referred Thelodus glaber to T. parvidens (cf. also Gross 1967) and T. laevis aff. planus to T. costatus. Of the taxa possibly present at Helvetesgraven she referred the scales of T. schmidti to T. sculptilis, T. traquairi and T. schmidti. The scales of T. goebeli were referred to T. sculptilis and T. schmidti. Turner (1984) assigned the scales of T. carinatus to T. sculptilis, and those of T. laevis to T. parvidens. T. schmidti scales, which were partly grouped with the redefined T. carinatus Pander and partly with the redefined T. laevis by Märss (1986b), are easily distinguished by their histology (dentinal tubules strongly curved rostrad).
Details
-
File Typepdf
-
Upload Time-
-
Content LanguagesEnglish
-
Upload UserAnonymous/Not logged-in
-
File Pages12 Page
-
File Size-