DOCSLIB.ORG

The Professor Comet's Report Mid Spring – May 2012

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Professor Comet's Report Mid Spring – May 2012 The Professor Comet’s Report 1 Mr. Justin J McCollum (BS, MS Physics) Lab Physics Coordinator Dept. of Physics Lamar University Welcome to the comet report which is a monthly article on Astronomy Sketch of the Day the observations of comets by the amateur astronomy Courtesy of James & Forrest Maxwell community and comet hunters from around the world! 4 April 2012 This article is dedicated to the latest reports of available comets for observations, current state of those comets, future predictions, & projections for observations in comet astronomy! Mid Spring – May 2012 The Professor Comet’s Report 2 The Current Status of the Predominant Comets for May 2012! Comets Designation Orbital Magnitude Trend Observation Constellations Visibility (IAU – MPC) Status Visual (Range in (Night Sky Location) Period Lat.) (alt. ≥ 30˚) Garradd 2009 P1 C 8.0* Fading 90°N – 50°S S region of Lynx moving S then 8 PM – 1 AM SSE into the N region of Cancer. CDT Giacobini - 21P P 9 – 10 Fading Poor N/A Zinner Elongation Lost in the daytime Glare! LINEAR 2011 F1 C 11 .6* Brightening 90°N – 25°S Undergoing retrograde motion (1 – 5) AM CDT between Boötes and Draco thru the late Spring. LINEAR C/2011 UF305 C 11.8* Rapid 90°N – 10˚N Circumpolar comet for May (1:30 - 5:00) AM Brightening (N region of Cepheus) CDT NEAT 246P/2010 V2 P 12.3* - 13 Possible 65˚N - 60˚S Undergoing retrograde motion Sunset – 3 AM Steadiness in the N central region of Virgo CDT & S boundary of Coma Berenices until late June. McNaught 2011 Q2 C 12.5 Fading 70˚N – 25˚N Currently in the SE region of Visible at Andromeda moving ENE alt. < 30˚ (3:30 – 5:00) AM towards Perseus. CDT McNaught 2009 F4 C 12.8* - 14 Steady Poor N/A Elongation Lost in the daytime Glare! *Visual Magnitude determined from last known field observation report! Comets with visually reported at visual magnitude values fainter than 13 or 13.5 are not reported on this list! Mid Spring – May 2012 The Professor Comet’s Report 3 Ephemeris Data Terminology Ephemeris Term Definition (plus additional comments) Date Month and Year using the standard Gregorian calendar. TT Terrestrial Time (Day of the Month) as a substitute for the astronomical Julian date. RA (2000) Right Ascension based on the Epoch J2000 (longitudinal coordinate for the celestial sky) measured in hours, minutes, and seconds. Dec (2000) Declination based on the Epoch J2000 (latitudinal coordinate for the night sky) measured in degrees, arcminutes, and arcseconds. Delta The distance from Earth measured in AUs (1 AU = 1 Astronomical Unit = 92 955 807 mi = 149 597 871 km as the mean distance between the Earth and Sun). R The solar distance measured in AUs (the distance between the comet or comet – like body and the Sun)! Elongation Solar elongation which is the angle of separation between the observed object and the Sun as measured across the night sky as measured in degrees. Phase Phase angle between the Sun, the celestial object, and the observer on the surface of the Earth. Also known as the Sun – Object – Observer angle. M1 M1: The visual magnitude of the celestial object as observed on the surface of the Earth at sea level. (Note M1 values predicted by the Minor Planet Center can differ from actual visual reports obtain in the field!) M2 The nuclear magnitude of the Comet which is also the visual magnitude of the false nucleus. (Rarely shown on a Comet’s ephemeris data spreadsheet unless all values show a visual brightness value above 19th magnitude!) “/min The progression or motion across the sky as measured in arcseconds per minute. P.A. Position angle while undergoing motion in the celestial sky. (P.A. is the same method applied to binary stars with starts at N goes counterclockwise in an easterly direction!) Moon Phase A Numerical value for designating the phases of the Moon on a scale of (0.00 – 1.00): A New Moon = 0.00, Waxing or Waning Crescent = (0.01 - 0.49), Half Moon (1st or Last Quarter = 0.50), Waxing or Waning Gibbous = (0.50 – 0.99), & Full Moon = 1.00 Foreshortening The appearance of the comet’s tail due to the geometric orientation between the Earth and a Comet. (% Fore.) (100% means the comet’s tail is parallel with the face of the Earth where as 0% means the tail is exactly perpendicular with respect to the face of the Earth!) Mid Spring – May 2012 The Professor Comet’s Report 4 All observations of comets are broken down into three factors: estimating Degree of Condensation (DC) magnitudes for light curves to predict future brightness, coma observations, and observations that concern with a comet’s tail(s). For the coma or a comet’s head there two characteristic features that are important for study: Degree of condensation (DC) and coma size measured in arcminutes. The classification system for determining the DC is based on a positive integer system from 0 to 9 as shown below. DC value Definition to numerical DC designation 0 Diffuse coma of uniform brightness 1 Diffuse coma with slight brightening towards center 2 Diffuse coma with definite brightening towards center 3 Centre of coma much brighter than edges, though still diffuse 4 Diffuse condensation at centre of coma 5 Condensation appears as a diffuse spot at centre of coma – described as moderately condensed 6 Condensation appears as a bright diffuse spot at centre of coma 7 Condensation appears like a star that cannot be focused – described as strongly condensed 8 Coma virtually invisible 9 Stellar or disk like in appearance Mid Spring – May 2012 The Professor Comet’s Report 5 A Synopsis of the Predominant Comets for the Spring & Summer 2012! Comet Garradd is now setting in the early to mid evening in the western skies with the constellations of the winter sky as we progress thru the middle of the Spring season in the month of May! Currently the comet is continuing to fade as it moves thru the Asteroid belt on its trajectory to the outer solar system and back to its origins most likely in the Kuiper Belt. The latest field reports give Garradd a visual magnitude brightness of 8.0 as of late April. Garradd was last reported on 28 April with an angular diameter of only 5 arcminutes (~2.6% the size of an average full Moon) with a DC of 5. There are no further reports on the conditions of the fan - shaped tail given that is now much harder to see with the rapid fading of comet Garradd as the Winter constellations disappear from the night sky by the end of May. However, both Lynx and Cancer will still be visible even after sunset up until the beginning of July. Therefore, May is the month to observe at least the coma of Garradd, but the central condensate (nucleus) of the coma will end up having a stellar magnitude of 11.0 by mid June. However, some predictions place the comet’s visibility at ‘non – observable’ before the end of early June with its solar elongation decreasing from 84˚ (1 May) to 60˚ (May 30). Therefore, May is likely the last month in which to observe comet Garradd before it is lost in the daytime solar glare until it is visible again in late October, but the comet will have faded to 13th magnitude while moving south thru the constellation of Sextans! There are no other comets that are prominent right now nor are any of the known cometary bodies currently being monitored are expected to get brighter than 8th or 8th magnitude expect comet 96P/Machholz 1 which is expected to be visible this summer during the months of July and August in the evening hours before midnight! Comet Machholz 1 is currently progressing eastward thru the northern edge of the southern constellation of Grus ‘the Crane’ and will move into the neighboring constellation of Sculptor by late April and move quickly thru the ‘Winter Hexagon’ asterisms of the winter constellations from mid – June and most of early – July lost in the daytime glare. However, once it is visible sometime in mid July it will be located between Lynx and Cancer low in the evening skies just after sunset with the planet Mars setting during the months of mid – Summer. As we move into the month of August the comet will have shifted its position further east towards the following in succession; Coma Berenices (25 July – 6 Aug), Virgo (6 – 7 Aug), Boötes (7 – 13 Aug), Virgo in its NE region (13 – 22 Aug), and Libra thru the end of August. Machholz 1 will reach a predicted maximum brightness of visual magnitude 7.0 by the month of July. However, the comet has a solar elongation below 60˚, so it will be difficult to see positioned at a sky altitude below 30˚ during the hours of dusk making a very difficult object to observe thru so much air and the effects of atmospheric refraction and mirage effects close to the distant horizon! Current predictions are placing this comet as a maximum brightness of visual magnitude -0.l (~6% brighter than Arcturus) and located in the constellation of Gemini the period of 1 -2 July, but with a solar elongation of 1 – 3 degrees! Mid Spring – May 2012 The Professor Comet’s Report 6 A Synopsis of the Predominant Comets for the Spring & Summer 2012! Once future prospect is in 2013 with the discovery of C/2011 L4 (PanSTARRS) discovered using 1.8m Pan – STARRS 1 RC telescope on the Hawaiian islands, USA the night of 6 June 2011 between 09:36 – 10:32 UTC or 04:36 – 05:32 AM local Hawaiian time.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Lurking in the Shadows: Wide-Separation Gas Giants As Tracers of Planet Formation
    Lurking in the Shadows: Wide-Separation Gas Giants as Tracers of Planet Formation Thesis by Marta Levesque Bryan In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Pasadena, California 2018 Defended May 1, 2018 ii © 2018 Marta Levesque Bryan ORCID: [0000-0002-6076-5967] All rights reserved iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First and foremost I would like to thank Heather Knutson, who I had the great privilege of working with as my thesis advisor. Her encouragement, guidance, and perspective helped me navigate many a challenging problem, and my conversations with her were a consistent source of positivity and learning throughout my time at Caltech. I leave graduate school a better scientist and person for having her as a role model. Heather fostered a wonderfully positive and supportive environment for her students, giving us the space to explore and grow - I could not have asked for a better advisor or research experience. I would also like to thank Konstantin Batygin for enthusiastic and illuminating discussions that always left me more excited to explore the result at hand. Thank you as well to Dimitri Mawet for providing both expertise and contagious optimism for some of my latest direct imaging endeavors. Thank you to the rest of my thesis committee, namely Geoff Blake, Evan Kirby, and Chuck Steidel for their support, helpful conversations, and insightful questions. I am grateful to have had the opportunity to collaborate with Brendan Bowler. His talk at Caltech my second year of graduate school introduced me to an unexpected population of massive wide-separation planetary-mass companions, and lead to a long-running collaboration from which several of my thesis projects were born.
    [Show full text]
  • CO Multi-Line Imaging of Nearby Galaxies (COMING) IV. Overview Of
    Publ. Astron. Soc. Japan (2018) 00(0), 1–33 1 doi: 10.1093/pasj/xxx000 CO Multi-line Imaging of Nearby Galaxies (COMING) IV. Overview of the Project Kazuo SORAI1, 2, 3, 4, 5, Nario KUNO4, 5, Kazuyuki MURAOKA6, Yusuke MIYAMOTO7, 8, Hiroyuki KANEKO7, Hiroyuki NAKANISHI9 , Naomasa NAKAI4, 5, 10, Kazuki YANAGITANI6 , Takahiro TANAKA4, Yuya SATO4, Dragan SALAK10, Michiko UMEI2 , Kana MOROKUMA-MATSUI7, 8, 11, 12, Naoko MATSUMOTO13, 14, Saeko UENO9, Hsi-An PAN15, Yuto NOMA10, Tsutomu, T. TAKEUCHI16 , Moe YODA16, Mayu KURODA6, Atsushi YASUDA4 , Yoshiyuki YAJIMA2 , Nagisa OI17, Shugo SHIBATA2, Masumichi SETA10, Yoshimasa WATANABE4, 5, 18, Shoichiro KITA4, Ryusei KOMATSUZAKI4 , Ayumi KAJIKAWA2, 3, Yu YASHIMA2, 3, Suchetha COORAY16 , Hiroyuki BAJI6 , Yoko SEGAWA2 , Takami TASHIRO2 , Miho TAKEDA6, Nozomi KISHIDA2 , Takuya HATAKEYAMA4 , Yuto TOMIYASU4 and Chey SAITA9 1Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, Hokkaido University, Kita 10 Nishi 8, Kita-ku, Sapporo 060-0810, Japan 2Department of Cosmosciences, Graduate School of Science, Hokkaido University, Kita 10 Nishi 8, Kita-ku, Sapporo 060-0810, Japan 3Department of Physics, School of Science, Hokkaido University, Kita 10 Nishi 8, Kita-ku, Sapporo 060-0810, Japan 4Division of Physics, Faculty of Pure and Applied Sciences, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennodai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8571, Japan 5Tomonaga Center for the History of the Universe (TCHoU), University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennodai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8571, Japan 6Department of Physical Science, Osaka Prefecture University, Gakuen 1-1,
    [Show full text]
  • April 2008 SKYSCRAPERS, INC · Amateur Astronomical Society of Rhode Island · 47 Peeptoad Road North Scituate, RI 02857 · April Meeting with Dr
    The SkyscraperVol. 35 No. 4 April 2008 SKYSCRAPERS, INC · Amateur Astronomical Society Of Rhode Island · 47 Peeptoad Road North Scituate, RI 02857 · www.theSkyscrapers.org April Meeting with Dr. Alan Guth Friday, April 4 at Seagrave Memorial Observatory Dr. Alan Guth, Professor of Origins, Alan Guth, A Golden Age of Physics at the Massachusetts Insti- Cosmology and other publications. tute of Technology, is best known He will be presenting a talk entitled The Orion Nebula: SBIG 1001E on Meade 16” for the “inflationary” theory of “Inflationary Cosmology.” SCT at Barus and Holley Observatory; L = 12 ex- cosmology in which many features For the April meeting we will be posures x 5 seconds each, binned 1x1; R,G,B = of our universe, including how it returning to Seagrave Observatory. 3 exposures each x 5 seconds each, binned 2x2; came to be so uniform and why it Elections will be held at the April 27 exposures total, total exposure time = 2.25 began so close to the critical density meeting and membership renewals minutes. Images combined and processed using can be explained by. Dr. Guth is the are due. An elections ballot and Maxim DL. Photo by Bob Horton. author of The Inflationary Universe, renewal form are included in the the Quest for a New Theory of Cosmic back of this issue. In This Issue April Meeting with 1 Dr. Alan Guth April 2008 President’s Message 2 Glenn Jackson 4 7:30 pm Annual Meeting with Dr. Alan Guth April Lyrids Meteor 3 Friday Seagrave Memorial Observatory Shower Dave Huestis 5 8:00 pm Public Observing Night Tracking Wildlife
    [Show full text]
  • Occurrence and Core-Envelope Structure of 1–4× Earth-Size Planets Around Sun-Like Stars
    Occurrence and core-envelope structure of 1–4× SPECIAL FEATURE Earth-size planets around Sun-like stars Geoffrey W. Marcya,1, Lauren M. Weissa, Erik A. Petiguraa, Howard Isaacsona, Andrew W. Howardb, and Lars A. Buchhavec aDepartment of Astronomy, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720; bInstitute for Astronomy, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, HI 96822; and cHarvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138 Edited by Adam S. Burrows, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, and accepted by the Editorial Board April 16, 2014 (received for review January 24, 2014) Small planets, 1–4× the size of Earth, are extremely common planets. The Doppler reflex velocity of an Earth-size planet − around Sun-like stars, and surprisingly so, as they are missing in orbiting at 0.3 AU is only 0.2 m s 1, difficult to detect with an − our solar system. Recent detections have yielded enough informa- observational precision of 1 m s 1. However, such Earth-size tion about this class of exoplanets to begin characterizing their planets show up as a ∼10-sigma dimming of the host star after occurrence rates, orbits, masses, densities, and internal structures. coadding the brightness measurements from each transit. The Kepler mission finds the smallest planets to be most common, The occurrence rate of Earth-size planets is a major goal of as 26% of Sun-like stars have small, 1–2 R⊕ planets with orbital exoplanet science. With three years of Kepler photometry in periods under 100 d, and 11% have 1–2 R⊕ planets that receive 1–4× hand, two groups worked to account for the detection biases in the incident stellar flux that warms our Earth.
    [Show full text]
  • 10. Scientific Programme 10.1
    10. SCIENTIFIC PROGRAMME 10.1. OVERVIEW (a) Invited Discourses Plenary Hall B 18:00-19:30 ID1 “The Zoo of Galaxies” Karen Masters, University of Portsmouth, UK Monday, 20 August ID2 “Supernovae, the Accelerating Cosmos, and Dark Energy” Brian Schmidt, ANU, Australia Wednesday, 22 August ID3 “The Herschel View of Star Formation” Philippe André, CEA Saclay, France Wednesday, 29 August ID4 “Past, Present and Future of Chinese Astronomy” Cheng Fang, Nanjing University, China Nanjing Thursday, 30 August (b) Plenary Symposium Review Talks Plenary Hall B (B) 8:30-10:00 Or Rooms 309A+B (3) IAUS 288 Astrophysics from Antarctica John Storey (3) Mon. 20 IAUS 289 The Cosmic Distance Scale: Past, Present and Future Wendy Freedman (3) Mon. 27 IAUS 290 Probing General Relativity using Accreting Black Holes Andy Fabian (B) Wed. 22 IAUS 291 Pulsars are Cool – seriously Scott Ransom (3) Thu. 23 Magnetars: neutron stars with magnetic storms Nanda Rea (3) Thu. 23 Probing Gravitation with Pulsars Michael Kremer (3) Thu. 23 IAUS 292 From Gas to Stars over Cosmic Time Mordacai-Mark Mac Low (B) Tue. 21 IAUS 293 The Kepler Mission: NASA’s ExoEarth Census Natalie Batalha (3) Tue. 28 IAUS 294 The Origin and Evolution of Cosmic Magnetism Bryan Gaensler (B) Wed. 29 IAUS 295 Black Holes in Galaxies John Kormendy (B) Thu. 30 (c) Symposia - Week 1 IAUS 288 Astrophysics from Antartica IAUS 290 Accretion on all scales IAUS 291 Neutron Stars and Pulsars IAUS 292 Molecular gas, Dust, and Star Formation in Galaxies (d) Symposia –Week 2 IAUS 289 Advancing the Physics of Cosmic
    [Show full text]
  • The Outermost Hii Regions of Nearby Galaxies
    THE OUTERMOST HII REGIONS OF NEARBY GALAXIES by Jessica K. Werk A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Astronomy and Astrophysics) in The University of Michigan 2010 Doctoral Committee: Professor Mario L. Mateo, Co-Chair Associate Professor Mary E. Putman, Co-Chair, Columbia University Professor Fred C. Adams Professor Lee W. Hartmann Associate Professor Marion S. Oey Professor Gerhardt R. Meurer, University of Western Australia Jessica K. Werk Copyright c 2010 All Rights Reserved To Mom and Dad, for all your love and encouragement while I was taking up space. ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I owe a deep debt of gratitude to a long list of individuals, institutions, and substances that have seen me through the last six years of graduate school. My first undergraduate advisor in Astronomy, Kathryn Johnston, was also my first Astronomy Professor. She piqued my interest in the subject from day one with her enthusiasm and knowledge. I don’t doubt that I would be studying something far less interesting if it weren’t for her. John Salzer, my next and last undergraduate advisor, not only taught me so much about observing and organization, but also is responsible for convincing me to go on in Astronomy. Were it not for John, I’d probably be making a lot more money right now doing something totally mind-numbing and soul-crushing. And Laura Chomiuk, a fellow Wesleyan Astronomy Alumnus, has been there for me through everything − problem sets and personal heartbreak alike. To know her as a friend, goat-lover, and scientist has meant so much to me over the last 10 years, that confining my gratitude to these couple sentences just seems wrong.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:2011.06570V1 [Astro-Ph.GA] 12 Nov 2020 Eral fields of Astrophysics
    Draft version November 13, 2020 Typeset using LATEX twocolumn style in AASTeX63 Fundamental Reference AGN Monitoring Experiment (FRAMEx) I: Jumping Out of the Plane with the VLBA Travis C. Fischer ,1, 2 Nathan J. Secrest ,2 Megan C. Johnson ,2 Bryan N. Dorland ,2 Phillip J. Cigan ,2 Luis C. Fernandez ,3 Lucas R. Hunt ,2 Michael Koss ,4 Henrique R. Schmitt ,5 and Norbert Zacharias 2 1AURA for ESA, Space Telescope Science Institute, Baltimore, MD, USA, 3700 San Martin Drive, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA 2U.S. Naval Observatory, 3450 Massachusetts Ave NW, Washington, DC 20392-5420, USA 3Department of Physics and Astronomy, George Mason University, MS3F3, 4400 University Drive, Fairfax, VA 22030, USA 4Eureka Scientific, 2452 Delmer Street Suite 100, Oakland, CA 94602-3017, USA 5Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, DC 20375, USA ABSTRACT We present the first results from the Fundamental Reference AGN Monitoring Experiment (FRAMEx), an observational campaign dedicated to understanding the physical processes that affect the apparent positions and morphologies of AGNs. In this work, we obtained simultaneous Swift X-ray Telescope (XRT) and Very Long Baseline Array (VLBA) radio observations for a snapshot campaign of 25 local AGNs that form a volume-complete sample with hard X-ray (14{195 keV) luminosities above 1042 erg s−1, out to a distance of 40 Mpc. Despite achieving an observation depth of ∼ 20 µJy, we find that 16 of 25 AGNs in our sample are not detected with the VLBA on milli-arcsecond (sub-parsec) scales, and the corresponding core radio luminosity upper limits are systematically below predictions from the Fundamental Plane of black hole activity.
    [Show full text]
  • Atlas Menor Was Objects to Slowly Change Over Time
    C h a r t Atlas Charts s O b by j Objects e c t Constellation s Objects by Number 64 Objects by Type 71 Objects by Name 76 Messier Objects 78 Caldwell Objects 81 Orion & Stars by Name 84 Lepus, circa , Brightest Stars 86 1720 , Closest Stars 87 Mythology 88 Bimonthly Sky Charts 92 Meteor Showers 105 Sun, Moon and Planets 106 Observing Considerations 113 Expanded Glossary 115 Th e 88 Constellations, plus 126 Chart Reference BACK PAGE Introduction he night sky was charted by western civilization a few thou - N 1,370 deep sky objects and 360 double stars (two stars—one sands years ago to bring order to the random splatter of stars, often orbits the other) plotted with observing information for T and in the hopes, as a piece of the puzzle, to help “understand” every object. the forces of nature. The stars and their constellations were imbued with N Inclusion of many “famous” celestial objects, even though the beliefs of those times, which have become mythology. they are beyond the reach of a 6 to 8-inch diameter telescope. The oldest known celestial atlas is in the book, Almagest , by N Expanded glossary to define and/or explain terms and Claudius Ptolemy, a Greco-Egyptian with Roman citizenship who lived concepts. in Alexandria from 90 to 160 AD. The Almagest is the earliest surviving astronomical treatise—a 600-page tome. The star charts are in tabular N Black stars on a white background, a preferred format for star form, by constellation, and the locations of the stars are described by charts.
    [Show full text]
  • Culpeper Astronomy Club Meeting March 25, 2019 Overview
    Copernicus & Trans-Neptunian Objects Culpeper Astronomy Club Meeting March 25, 2019 Overview • Introductions • Copernicus • Pluto and Trans-Neptunian Objects (TNO) • Constellations: Canis Major, Lepus, Monoceros • Observing Session (Weather permitting) Observing Sessions • CAC Group Session: 23 March, 7:30-11 p.m. • Had a great evening under incredible skies! • ISS Pass at 7:55 p.m. lasted 6 minutes • 4 inch refractor (SV110ED/G11) • Mars, small (4.79”) and reddish; Uranus, blue dot low in horizon • Open clusters: the Pleiades (M45) and the Beehive (M44) and M35, M36, M37, M38, M41, M46, M47, and M48 • Several double stars were checked out in Cassiopeia, Taurus, Leo and Cancer...including 57 Cancri, an exceptionally close double at 1.5 arcsec • 30 inch dobsonian • Nebula (M42 and Owl) • Galaxies (M81 and 82); Leo Geocentric Theory • The geocentric model (also known as Geocentrism, or the Ptolemaic system) is a superseded description of the Universe with Earth at the center • Under the geocentric model, the Sun, Moon, stars, and planets all orbited Earth • The geocentric model served as the predominant description of the cosmos in many ancient civilizations, such as those of Aristotle and Ptolemy • Two observations supported the idea that Earth was the center of the Universe: • First, from anywhere on Earth, the Sun appears to revolve around Earth once per day; while the Moon and the planets have their own motions, they also appear to revolve around Earth about once per day; the stars appeared to be fixed on a celestial sphere rotating
    [Show full text]
  • FY13 High-Level Deliverables
    National Optical Astronomy Observatory Fiscal Year Annual Report for FY 2013 (1 October 2012 – 30 September 2013) Submitted to the National Science Foundation Pursuant to Cooperative Support Agreement No. AST-0950945 13 December 2013 Revised 18 September 2014 Contents NOAO MISSION PROFILE .................................................................................................... 1 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................ 2 2 NOAO ACCOMPLISHMENTS ....................................................................................... 4 2.1 Achievements ..................................................................................................... 4 2.2 Status of Vision and Goals ................................................................................. 5 2.2.1 Status of FY13 High-Level Deliverables ............................................ 5 2.2.2 FY13 Planned vs. Actual Spending and Revenues .............................. 8 2.3 Challenges and Their Impacts ............................................................................ 9 3 SCIENTIFIC ACTIVITIES AND FINDINGS .............................................................. 11 3.1 Cerro Tololo Inter-American Observatory ....................................................... 11 3.2 Kitt Peak National Observatory ....................................................................... 14 3.3 Gemini Observatory ........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Double and Multiple Star Measurements in the Northern Sky with a 10” Newtonian and a Fast CCD Camera in 2006 Through 2009
    Vol. 6 No. 3 July 1, 2010 Journal of Double Star Observations Page 180 Double and Multiple Star Measurements in the Northern Sky with a 10” Newtonian and a Fast CCD Camera in 2006 through 2009 Rainer Anton Altenholz/Kiel, Germany e-mail: rainer.anton”at”ki.comcity.de Abstract: Using a 10” Newtonian and a fast CCD camera, recordings of double and multiple stars were made at high frame rates with a notebook computer. From superpositions of “lucky images”, measurements of 139 systems were obtained and compared with literature data. B/w and color images of some noteworthy systems are also presented. mented double stars, as will be described in the next Introduction section. Generally, I used a red filter to cope with By using the technique of “lucky imaging”, seeing chromatic aberration of the Barlow lens, as well as to effects can strongly be reduced, and not only the reso- reduce the atmospheric spectrum. For systems with lution of a given telescope can be pushed to its limits, pronounced color contrast, I also made recordings but also the accuracy of position measurements can be with near-IR, green and blue filters in order to pro- better than this by about one order of magnitude. This duce composite images. This setup was the same as I has already been demonstrated in earlier papers in used with telescopes under the southern sky, and as I this journal [1-3]. Standard deviations of separation have described previously [1-3]. Exposure times varied measurements of less than +/- 0.05 msec were rou- between 0.5 msec and 100 msec, depending on the tinely obtained with telescopes of 40 or 50 cm aper- star brightness, and on the seeing.
    [Show full text]
  • Spitzer's Perspective of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Galaxies
    REVIEW ARTICLE https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-020-1051-1 Spitzer’s perspective of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in galaxies Aigen Li Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) molecules are abundant and widespread throughout the Universe, as revealed by their distinctive set of emission bands at 3.3, 6.2, 7.7, 8.6, 11.3 and 12.7 μm, which are characteristic of their vibrational modes. They are ubiquitously seen in a wide variety of astrophysical regions, ranging from planet-forming disks around young stars to the interstellar medium of the Milky Way and other galaxies out to high redshifts at z ≳ 4. PAHs profoundly influence the thermal budget and chemistry of the interstellar medium by dominating the photoelectric heating of the gas and controlling the ionization balance. Here I review the current state of knowledge of the astrophysics of PAHs, focusing on their observational characteristics obtained from the Spitzer Space Telescope and their diagnostic power for probing the local physical and chemi- cal conditions and processes. Special attention is paid to the spectral properties of PAHs and their variations revealed by the Infrared Spectrograph onboard Spitzer across a much broader range of extragalactic environments (for example, distant galax- ies, early-type galaxies, galactic halos, active galactic nuclei and low-metallicity galaxies) than was previously possible with the Infrared Space Observatory or any other telescope facilities. Also highlighted is the relation between the PAH abundance and the galaxy metallicity established for the first time by Spitzer. n the early 1970s, a new chapter in astrochemistry was opened by some of the longstanding unexplained interstellar phenomena (for Gillett et al.1 who, on the basis of ground observations, detected example, the 2,175 Å extinction bump9,16,19, the diffuse interstellar three prominent emission bands peaking at 8.6, 11.3 and 12.7 μm bands20, the blue and extended red photoluminescence emission21 I 22,23 in the 8–14 μm spectra of two planetary nebulae, NGC 7027 and and the ‘anomalous microwave emission’ ).
    [Show full text]