The Chondrocranium of an Embryo Pig, Sus Scrofa

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Chondrocranium of an Embryo Pig, Sus Scrofa THE CHONDROCRANIUM OF AN EMBRYO PIG, SUS SCROFA. A CONTRIBUTIONTO THE MORPIIOLOGYOF TIIE MAMMALIANSKULL. BY CHARLES SEARING MEAD. WITH 11 TEXTFIGURES AND 4 PLATES. CONTENTS. PAGE Introduction .......................................................... 1~7 The Skull as a Wliole ............................................... .1G9 Planum Basale ........................................................ 170 Regio Occipitalis .................................................... 175 Regio Otica ........................................................... 178 Auditory Capsules ................................................ 150 Sound-Conducting Apparatus ...................................... .1S5 Nerve Foramina in the Region of the Ear-Capsules. ................ .1SS Regio Orbitotemporalis ................................................ 1~2 Regio Ethmoidalis .................................................... 199 (!onelusions ........................................................... ZOC; Bibliography .......................................................... 20s INTRODUCTION. The study of the chondrocranium of Sus is of value not only in assisting us to understand the structure of the adult skull in this form, but also on account of its bearing on the general morphology of the mammalian cranium. Owing to the generalized dentition and the structure of the feet, Sus has becn placed relatively low in the ungulate series. Benee, we would expect many primitive char- acters to be retained in its cartilaginous cranium, and, indeed, this is the fact, fomr a number of reptilian characters arc present. This chondrocranium is also valuable for comparison with those of pri- mates and insectivores. THE AHERICANJOURNAL OF ANATOIfY.-vOL. Is, NO. 2. 168 Charles Searing Mead. The Sus embryo studied was 30 mm. long (head-rump measure- ment), and the length of its head I2 min. The head was cut trans- versely into ‘795 sections, each 0.015 inm. thick. The cartilage in all the even-numbered sections was drawn with the aid of a projec- tion apparatus, the drawings being enlargements of 25 diameters. In making the reconstruction, Born’s wax plate method was used. For comparison I have had Ziegler’s wax models of the chondro- crania of man, Gallus, Lacerta and Rana. In addition, Professor Eugen Fischer, of the University of Freiburg, loaned me his re- constructions of the Semnopithecus, Xacacus, Tarsius and Talpa skulls, and the series of sections from which his Talpa reconstruction was made. Also a reconstruetion of the primordial cranium of Lepus, prepared by Dr. Max Voit, has been of service. Of the niodels and reconstructions used for comparison, the one of Talpa resembled moi-e closely that of Siis than dicl any of the others, and, hence, has been referred to most frequently in the com- parisons. The literature dealing with the development of the mammalian skull is very extensive. The publications of Parker, Spandli, KZiilliker and Decker, on the chondrocrania of the mammals, are the principal works bclonging to the old school, in n-hich the skulls wem prepared principally by the maceration method. The introduction of Born’s wax plate method of reconstruction has made possiblc not only a inore exact study of the embryonic cranium itself, but has also enabled one to study the snrrounding tissues as well. A more fundamental view of the skull is thns obtained. Among the more recent papers on the embryonic skull may be mentioned Gaupp’s “Die Entwickelung des Kopfskelettes” in IIertwig’s ITandbueh (1905 b), valuable on account of its general survey; also his ex- tensive contribution on the developnient of the sliall of Echidna (1908). The papers of Fiseher on Talpa (1901 b) and the apes (I 903) and a forthcoiniiig paper of Yoit on IJelms (1909) likewise contain valuable results. This investigation was undertaken at the suggestion of Professor Ernst Gaupp. The ~vorlcwas conducted in the laboratory of the Comparative Anatomical Institute of Freiburg in Eaclen. The Choiidrocraniuin of an Embryo Pig. 169 I will here take the opportunity to express to Professor Gaupp my sincere appreciation iiot only for the ~iseof his ex&iisive series of sections, but also for his very valuable help and suggestions. Dr. Max Voit I wish to thank for the use of his Lep~isreconstruction aiid for the assistance which he has rendered me. And for the loan of the reconstrixctions of the Semnopithecus, Macacus, Tarsius and Talpa skulls, and also for the series of sectioiis froin which the Talpa reconstriiction was inacle I wish to express to Professor Eugen Fischer my siiicere thanks. TI-IESKULL AS A WIIOLE. The form of the priniordial cranimii of the pig represents well the generalized nianiiiialiaii type of chonclrocranium. No part is inarliedly underdeveloped and no part is greatly overderelopetl at the expense of the snrroundiiig portions. As a whole, the chondrocraniiiiii at this stage of development, i. e., in an embryo 30 mm. long, resembles a pear iii shape, with the small end anterior, forming the nasal region, and the large end posterior. The large brain-box is widely opeii dorsally, a feature characteristic of the amniotes. Later this region of the skull is completed by the formztion of the large roofing membrane bones, the frontals and parietals. Ventrally the geiieral contour is completed by the nian- dibular, hyoicl aiid branchial arches. The brain-case is large and extends forward OTW the posterior half of the nasal capsules, forcing the fenestra: cribrosa: froiii their priiiiitive vertical position into :3 horizontal one. Its side walls are formed by a broad continuous plate of cartilage on each side, thus standing in sharp coiitrast to the coiidition in siinilar eiiibryos of mail and the primates, in which this region is very rudimentary. The nasal capsules are of inoclerate length, not long as in Talpa, nor short as in nian. Taken as a whole, the chondrocraniuin is complete except for some minor details. None of the cartilaginous bones (Ersafzlcnochen, Gaupp) have as yet begun to ossify. Some of the membrane bones have not yet appeared aiid the others are only in the very early stages of their formation ; con- seq~~entlythey have not been inclutled in niy reconstruction (Pls. I-IV). With tlie exception of the iiianclibular, hyoicl and braaach ial 170 Charles Searing Mead. arches (the visceral skeleton), the different parts of the skull are not separated by sutures, the cartilage composing the neural cranium forming one continuous unit. Kolliker has divided the skull into the posterior part, the pars chordalis, through which the notochord runs, and the pars prechordalis, situated anterior to this. Each of these divisions Gegenbaur has again divided into two regions, which Gaupp has named, from behind forward, as follows: regio occjpitalis, regio otica, regio orbitotemporalis and regio ethmoidalis. For de- scriptive purposes it will be convenient to follow these divisions, ex- cept that the basal portions of the two posterior regions will first be considered together, since they form a fairly complete unit, the planum basale (Gaupp). PLANUMBASALE. The planum basale comprises the basal portions of the two poste- rior regions of the skull. It extends from the foramen magnum forward to the posterior LorJer of the hypophysial fossa and iq perforated for nearly its entire length by the notochord. Its anterior three-fifths, i. e., the portion belonging to the regio otica, is narrow and rod-like (Pl. I and Figs. 1, 3, 4 and 5), while its posterior por- tion is spread out into a broad quadrangular plate, the basilar part of the occipital region. The anterior portion of the basal plate in Sus differs strikingly from that in other mammals on account of its narrow, rod-like shape and also because of the character of its union with the ear-capsules. Here it is separated from the aar-capsules except for a thin connect- ing lamella of cartilage, while in the other mammals that I have examined it is firmly united with the capsules. In the other mam- mals, also, the planurn basale forms a broad plate of cartilage, which passes over without sharp demarcation into the broad basal cartilage of the orbitotemporal region. Tarsius offers an exception to this statement, since in it the portion between the cochlear spheres is even narrower than in Sus. This, however, is due to the extremely large size of the ear-capsules, which approach the middle line and compress the cartilaginous plate which lies between them. Back of the auditory bulk the planum basale spreads out into Thc Choncirocraniuin of an Embryo Pig. 171 a broad quadrangular plate, limited posteriorly by the foramen mag- num, anteriorly by the foramen jtigulare or fissura metolica and the auditory bull=, while laterally it passes over into the pars lateralis, regio occipitalis. On the boundary between the basal plate and the Z. pa a.s.c. VIII utr. Z.S.C. m.st. j.v. x. T. uw. .X - xrr n.c. 6.p. FIG.1. Section shoiviug the broad basal plate b.p, the uotochord n.c. near its dorsal surface, and tlie large auricular brmcli of the vagus nerve X r.aur. x 10. VZZZ, nervus acusticus ; mst., stapedial iiiuscle ; j.v., jugular vein ; I.S.C., lateral semicircular caiial : wtr., utricwlus : a.s.c., anterior seiiiicircular canal ; 1. par., lamina parietalis ; X, nervus vagus : XIZ, nervus hypoglossus. pars lateralis the proccssus paroccipitaZis arises and extends forward. The basal plate is perforated just median to this process by the foramen nervi hypogZossi (Pl. I, f. hyp.). Three branches of the hypoglossus nerve have been demonstrated in a number of mammalian 172 Charles Searing Mead. embryos, but the anterior one disappears and the other two usually leave the cranial cavity through a single foramen, the foramen hypoglossi (foramen spinokipitale). Voit found that in Lepus embryos two foraniiiia hypoglossi are pyseiit on each side, ant1 these may persist even in the adult. Fischer described in an embryo of Semnopithecus pruinosus two hypoglossal foramina on the left side and three on the right. On the other hand, his reconstruction of Semnopitkecus ninurus shows but a single foramen on each side. This shows what variations may occur within the limits of a single genus or even species.
Recommended publications
  • 003 ANATOMY Lectures.Qxd
    Abstracts www.anatomy.org.tr doi:10.2399/ana.10.019x Abstracts for the 2nd International Symposium of Clinical and Applied Anatomy, prof. Josef Stingl JUBILEE, July 9th - 11th, 2010, Prague, Czech Republic Anatomy 2010; 4 Suppl 1: 19-90 © 2010 TSACA Lectures (L-01 — L-96) Saturday, July 10 clinical disciplines, started to develop first professor Karel 08.45: Opening Lecture (Syllaba´s Hall) Weigner during the thirties of the 20th century. In his tradi- tion continued successfully several generations of Czech Moderator: Báča Václav anatomists on all seven Czech medical faculties. The most intensive advancement the Czech clinical anatomy enjoys, as L-01 both scientific as well as pedagogic discipline, during the last 30 History of the Czech clinical anatomy years, above all in connection with the intensive technological Stingl Josef development of most clinical disciplines. Department of Anatomy, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague, Praha, Czech Republic [email protected] 09.15: Honorary Lectures dedicated to prof. Stingl (Syllaba´s Hall) Moderator: Báča Václav The Prague University was founded 1348 as the 27th one in Europe. The Medical Faculty was its part from the very begin, L-02 but the medical curriculum had for several hundreds years a medieval scholastic form, without anatomy. The history of the Scanning electron microscopy of vascular corrosion Czech anatomy started in fact in June 1600, when professor casts: a means to study growth and regression of blood Johannes Jessenius presented the first public anatomical dissec- vessels in normal and diseased tissues and organs? tion in Prague. But the real development of the anatomy as a Lametschwandtner Alois, Bartel Heidi, Tangphokhanon full-value part of the medical curriculum began in the Wasan, Gerlach Nicolas, Minnich Bernd Bohemian Kingdom first after the reforms of the Empress Department of Organismic Biology, University of Salzburg, Maria Theresia and Emperor Josef the Second during the sec- Salzburg, Austria ond half of the 18th century.
    [Show full text]
  • The Development of the Skull in the Skink, Eumeces Quinquelineatus L. I. the Chondrocranium
    AUTHOR'S ABSTRACI OF THIS PAPER ISSUED BY THE BIBLIOQRAPHIC SERVICE. MARCH 8 THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE SKULL IN THE SKINK. EUMECES QUINQUELINEATUS L . I . THE CHONDROCRANIUM EDWARD L. RICE Ohio Wesleyan University TWELVE PLATES (THIRTY-THREE FIGURES) CONTENTS 1 . Introduction.......................................................... 120 2 . Material and methods ................................................. 121 3 . Basal plate and associated parts ....................................... 123 1. Basal plate and occipital condyle ................................. 123 2 . Notochord ........................................................ 127 3 . Nerve foramina of basal plate ..................................... 129 4 . Occipital region ....................................................... 135 5 . Otic region ............................................................ 138 1 . General description ............................................... 138 2 . Exterior of auditory capsule ...................................... 139 3 . Interior of auditory capsule ....................................... 142 4 . Foramina of otic region .... ................................... 144 5 . Crista parotica and colume uris ............................... 155 6 . Orbitotemporal region ................................................. 168 1. General description ............................................... 168 2 . Floor of entire orbitotemporal region .............................. 169 3 . Basipterygoid process and associated structures ..................
    [Show full text]
  • Your Inner Fish
    Get hundreds more LitCharts at www.litcharts.com Your Inner Fish INTRODUCTION RELATED LITERARY WORKS Your Inner Fish seeks to both interest and educate the general BRIEF BIOGRAPHY OF NEIL SHUBIN public about scientific issues that might otherwise never receive attention, much like books such as Bill Bryson’s Neil Shubin earned his Ph.D. in organismic and evolutionary A Brief or by biology from Harvard in 1987. In 2006, Shubin and his team History of Everything The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks Rebecca Skloot. Two of the most well-known popular science found the fossil Tiktaalik roseae, an important intermediary form authors were Steven Hawking and Carl Sagan. between fish and land animals. This discovery catapulted Your Inner Fish Shubin into the public eye, as he was named ABC News’ specifically deals with the topic of ve olution and comparative “person of the week,” gave several interviews about the fossil, anatomy, drawing from Charles Darwin’s classic The Origin of to the works of Richard Dawkins. and wrote Your Inner Fish to help educate the public about Species scientific topics. Since then, Shubin helped produce a television show under the same name to bring contemporary science KEY FACTS topics into the classroom. Shubin was elected into the National • Full Title: Your Inner Fish Academy of Sciences in 2011, and he now works as a professor at the University of Chicago, focusing his research on limb • When Written: 2006-2008 development. Shubin has published numerous articles in • When Published: January 15, 2008 scientific journals regarding his research on fossils like Tiktaalik, • Literary Period: Contemporary non-fiction, opP science the embryonic development of salamanders, and gene • Genre: Popular Science, Non-fiction expression in fish fins.
    [Show full text]
  • Der Ursprung Der Säugetiere')
    Der Ursprung der Säugetiere) Von EMIL KUHN-SCHNYDER (Zürich) (mit 16 Abbildungen im Text) gDie Form lst der Ausdruck ihrer Funktionen.» O. JAEKEL, 1902, p. 60 1859 erschien DARwrivs Werk: «Über die Entstehung der Arten durch natür- liche Zuchtwahl». DARWIN verknüpfte eine Fülle von Beobachtungen durch eine, grosse Idee: Tier- und Pflanzenarten sind veränderlich. Die heute leben- den Arten sind aus geologisch älteren Arten durch allmähliche Umwand- lung entstanden. Die Entwicklung der Pflanzen- und Tierwelt ist eine Tatsache. Diese Idee zündete wie ein Blitz. Sie war das Stichwort für eine neue, glän- zende Periode der Biologie. Naturgeschichte, statt Naturbeschreibung, wurde zum neuen Inhalt der Forschung. Jetzt hatte es einen Sinn, sich mit der Abstammung der Tiere zu befassen. Und sobald dieses Problem gestellt war, musste die Frage nach der Herkunft der Säugetiere, an deren Spitze der Mensch steht, brennend werden. Von allen Zweigen der Wissenschaft, die im Dunkel der Stammesgeschichte als Führer dienen wollten, erhob anfänglich die Entwicklungsgeschichte am stolzesten ihr Haupt. Galt doch. die Entwicklung eines Tieres vom Ei bis zur Geburt nichts weiter als ein verkürztes Abbild seines Stammbaumes. In der Entwicklungsgeschichte sahen viele nicht nur den Schlüssel zur Lösung aller vergleichend anatomischen Probleme, sondern auch den wahren Lichtträger in der Stammbaumforschung. Wie stand es um die Paläontologie? «Die Paläontologie ist für die Genea- logie-Bestimmung im Tierreich von geringem Wert», lautete eine der Thesen, die ANTON DOHRN 1868 zur Habilitations-Disputation der Universität Jena ein- gereicht hatte (1). Und auch für die Zukunft erhoffte man von der Paläonto- logie nicht viel. Diese ungünstige Prognose kümmerte die Paläontologen wenig.
    [Show full text]
  • Visual Standards and Disciplinary Change (Journal Article)
    Hist. Sci., xliii (2005) VISUAL STANDARDS AND DISCIPLINARY CHANGE: NORMAL PLATES, TABLES AND STAGES IN EMBRYOLOGY Nick Hopwood University of Cambridge When I worked in developmental biology between 1986 and 1991 only two books had permanent places on my bench. The first, ‘Maniatis’, was a manual of the molecular cloning methods that our Cambridge laboratory was using to identify genes that specify muscle development in the South African clawed frog, Xenopus laevis. The second was ‘Nieuwkoop and Faber’, a ‘normal table’ that describes Xenopus embryos, one of the half-dozen model systems on which most developmental biol- ogy has been done. I knew the ring-bound recipes of Tom Maniatis et al. inside out, but with its dense morphological descriptions Pieter Nieuwkoop and Job Faber’s Systematical and chronological survey of the development from the fertilized egg till the end of metamorphosis seemed an alien work from a bygone age — it was first published in 1956 — and I read only those few of the 250 pages that give ‘external and internal stage criteria’ through early development. My attention focused instead on the fold-out plates, a series of stippled line drawings that I photocopied and stuck above the bench. By internalizing these images, first encountered in an undergradu- ate practical class, I learned to tell gastrulae from blastulae and neurulae, and then stage 10 ½ early gastrulae from stage 11 mid-gastrulae, and so to see my frogspawn develop in the same way as other people saw theirs. “Embryos”, the Methods sec- tions of our papers reported, “were staged according to Nieuwkoop and Faber”.
    [Show full text]
  • Memorial Statements of the Cornell University Faculty 1868-1939 Volume 1
    Memorial Statements of the Cornell University Faculty 1868-1939 Volume 1 Memorial Statements of the Cornell University Faculty The memorial statements contained herein were prepared by the Office of the Dean of the University Faculty of Cornell University to honor its faculty for their service to the university. Gould Colman, proofreader J. Robert Cooke, producer ©2010 Cornell University, Office of the Dean of the University Faculty All Rights Reserved Published by the Internet-First University Press http://ifup.cit.cornell.edu/ Founded by J. Robert Cooke and Kenneth M. King The contents of this volume are openly accessible online at ecommons.library.cornell.edu/handle/1813/17811 Preface The custom of honoring each deceased faculty member through a memorial statement was established in 1868, just after the founding of Cornell University. Annually since 1938, the Office of the Dean of the Faculty has produced a memorial booklet which is sent to the families of the deceased and also filed in the university archives. We are now making the entire collection of memorial statements (1868 through 2009) readily available online and, for convenience, are grouping these by the decade in which the death occurred, assembling the memorials alphabetically within the decade. The Statements for the early years (1868 through 1938, assembled by Dean Cornelius Betten and now enlarged to include the remaining years of the 1930s, are in volume one. Many of these entries also included retirement statements; when available, these follow the companion memorial statement in this book. A CD version has also been created. A few printed archival copies are being bound and stored in the Office of the Dean of the Faculty and in the Rare and Manuscript Collection in Kroch Library.
    [Show full text]