DOCSLIB.ORG

Annexes & Notes

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Pedro Nájera Quezada & al. - About the use and abuse of Peyote (Lophophora williamsii) – Annexes & Notes Seizures recorded in newspapers or preliminary investigations Number of Date Number of Peyote seized Preliminary Investigation Notes persons arrested 2009, May 13 2 not stipulated AP/PGR/PUE/PUEV/400/ Narco-nudists 2009 2009, Sep 6 2 6pzs = 950gr, dried Peyote AP/PGR/VER/XAL/II/062/ 133 “Asenlix” psychotropic pills 2009-UMAN 2010, Feb 3 1 520pzs = 48kg, fresh AP/PGR/SLP/MATEH09/CS/ Turist Peyote 2010 2010, Jun 26 1 60pzs = 2kg + 700gr, fresh Juvenile Peyote 2010 s.n. 0 27 kg, dried Peyote AP/PGR/VER/XAL/I/037/ 2010- Tasting dried Peyote buttons UMAN confused for fungal hallucinogens 2010, Nov 27 1 2kg + 100gr, dried Peyote AP/PGR/SON/STA-I/377/2010 Truck driver 2011, Apr 6 1 2kg + 260gr, fresh Peyote Turist 2011, Aug 1 1 875g + 500mg AP/PGR/JAL/ZAP/1763/ 2011 Drugs and weapons 2011, Aug 31 4 19kg + 400g, Peyote AP/PGR/QRO/SJR-VII/286/2011 652 “Clobenzorex” psychotropic capsules, 99 Methylphenidate psychotropic tablets, 19 kilos and 400 grams of Peyote and Weapons 2011, Oct 13 8 225 pzs, fresh Peyote Turists 2011, Oct 15 6? 139 pzs Raids on the 13,14 and 15 Oct 2011 2011, Nov 13 2 10 pzs, fresh Peyote Turists 2012, Jan 14 5 900pzs = 28kg, dried Turists Peyote 2012, Feb 6 2 168 pzas = 16 kg + 620gr AP/PGR/SLP/SLP- Weapons and stolen vehicles fresh Peyote VI/080/CS/2012 2012, Sep 24 3 21 pzs, fresh Peyote Turists 2013, Mar 1 1 7 pzs, fresh Peyote Dealer 2013, Mar 20 1 20 pzs, fresh Peyote Juvenile 2013, Mar 24 3 2 pzs, fresh Peyote Juveniles 2013, Mar 27 1 20 pzs Without preliminary report 2013, Mar 31 1 1 pzs, fresh Peyote Juvenile 2013, Apr 6 21 60kg, fresh Peyote No info 2013, Apr 7 7 198kg + 50g, fresh Peyote No preliminary inquiry? Marakame Don Cruz Silvestre and his companions 2013, Apr 14 2 not stipulated Turists 2013, Aug 19 3 115 pzs = 4kg + 800gr, Juveniles fresh Peyote Bibliography Alan Savory, 1983; The Savory Grazing Method or Holistic Resource Management; Rangelands 5(4)Anderson, E.F., 1969. The biogeography, ecology, and taxonomy of Lophophora (Cactaceae). Brittonia 21, 299-310. Anderson, E.F., 1995. The "Peyote Gardens" of South Texas: a conservation crisis? Cactus & Succulent Journal 67(2): 67-73. Batis, A., y M. Rojas. 2002. El peyote y otros cactos alucinógenos de México. CONABIO. Biodiversitas 40:12-17 Benítez F. 1968. Los Indios de México. Tomo II: Los Huicholes. Biblioteca Era. México. 605 pp. Bravo-Hollis, Helia. 1978. Las cactáceas de México. Tomo I. México, UNAM. Champagne, Duane. The Native North American Almanac. Detroit: Gale Research Inc. 1999. Xerophilia – Volume 2, No. 4 (7) – December 2013 1 ISSN 2285 – 3987 Pedro Nájera Quezada & al. - About the use and abuse of Peyote (Lophophora williamsii) – Annexes & Notes Daniela Montero Anaya, Oscar R. García Rubio; 2010 ANÁLISIS ESPACIAL POR ÍNDICES DE DISTANCIA (SADIE) DE LOPHOPHORA WILLIAMSII EN TRES PARCELAS CON DIFERENTE GRADO DE PERTURBACIÓN EN SAN LUIS POTOSÍ. Laboratorio de Ecología, Facultad de Ciencias Naturales, Universidad Autónoma de Querétaro. Diaz, J. L. (2003). "Las plantas magicas y la conciencia visionaria." Arqueologia Mexicana 10(59) Edward F. Anderson, Botany of Peyote, University of Arizona Press, 1980 El-Seedi, H.R., De Smet, P.A.G.M., Beck, O., Göran, P., Bruhn, J.G., 2005. Prehistoric peyote use: Alkaloid analysis and radiocarbon dating of archaeological specimens of Lophophora from Texas. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 101, 238- 242. Fred Dortort, 2007; Under Discussion Mexican Oddities Strombocactus, Pelecyphora, Obregonia, Aztekium, Geohintonia and Lophophora; Cactus and Succulent Journal, 79(1):21-29. 2007. Glafiro J. Alanís Flores, Carlos G. Velazco Macías; Importancia de las cactáceas como recurso natural en el noreste de México, Ciencia y Sociedad; CIENCIA UANL / VOL. XI, No. 1, ENERO - MARZO 2008 Hill, Thomas W. "Peyotism and the control of heavy drinking: The Nebraska Winnebago in the early 1900s." Human Organization. (1990) Hofman, A. and R. E. Schultes (1979/1992/2000/2008). Plants of the gods. Rochester, Vermont, Healing Arts Press. Jay Fikes; 1996, A Brief History of the Native American Church; One nation Under God Lozoya, X. (1983). "Sobre la investigacion de las plantas psicotropicos den las antiguas culturas indígenas de México." Estudios de la cultura nahuatl. IHH /UNAM Mexico Mabit, J. (1995). "De los usos y abusos de sustancias psicotrópicas y los estados alterados de conciencia." Revista Takiwasi 1(1995). Márquez Castrejón, Cecilia; 2010, Usos medicinales del Peyote (Lophophora williamsii); Tlahui, Cuernavaca, Mor. México. Martin Terry; 2008 Stalking the wild Lophophora, part 1,2,3; Cactus and Succulent Journal; 2008 VOLUME 80 NUMBER 4,5,6 Mtra. Claudia Gamboa Montejano, 2013, LEGALIZACIÓN DEL CONSUMO, PRODUCCIÓN Y COMERCIALIZACIÓN DE LAS DROGAS, ELEMENTOS PARA EL DEBATE EN MÉXICO Marco Teórico Conceptual, Antecedentes, Marco Jurídico Actual, Iniciativas presentadas (Primera Parte); SAPI-ISS-41-13 Nierika, 2011, Análisis sobre la clasificación internacional del Peyote medicina tradicional indígena como psicotrópico clase I sin valor terapéutico. NIERIKA, 2011, Análisis sobre la clasificación internacional del Peyote medicina tradicional indígena, WWW.NIERIKA.INFO Pascarosa, Paul. "Ethnopsychedelic therapy for alcoholics: Observations in the peyote ritual of the native american church." Journal of Psychedelic Drugs. (1976) Pérez-Gil Salcido, R., F. Jaramillo Monroy; A.M. Muñiz Salcedo y M.G. Torrez Gómez. 1995. Importancia económica de los vertebrados silvestres de México. PG7/Conabio. México. RICHARD EVANS SCHULTES and ilustrations by ELMER W. SMITH, 1976; Hallucinogenic plants; Golden Press, NY. Sarukhán, J., J. Soberón y J. Larson-Guerra. 1996. Biological Conservations in a High Beta-diversity Country. En: Di Castri, F. y T. Younès (eds.). Biodiversity Science and Development: Towards a New Partnership. CAB International. Stewart, H. (1993). Peyote religion: A histrory. Oklahoma, University Press. Terry, M. and J.D. Mauseth. 2006. Root-shoot anatomy and post-harvest vegetative clonal development in Lophophora williamsii (Cactaceae: Cacteae): Implications for Conservation. Sida 22:565−592. Terry, M., K. Trout, B. Williams, T. Herrera, and N. Fowler. 2012. Limitations to natural production of Lophophora williamsii (Cactaceae) II. Effects of repeated harvesting at two-year intervals in a South Texas population. J. Bot. Res. Inst. Texas, 6:567−577. Terry, M., K. Trout, B. Williams, T. Herrera, and N. Fowler. 2011. Limitations to natural production of Lophophora williamsii (Cactaceae) I. Regrowth and Survivorship two years post harvest in a South Texas population. J. Bot. Res. Inst. Texas 5:661−675. Xerophilia – Volume 2, No. 4 (7) – December 2013 2 ISSN 2285 – 3987 Pedro Nájera Quezada & al. - About the use and abuse of Peyote (Lophophora williamsii) – Annexes & Notes Terry, M., Keeper Trout, M. Abul Kalam, Molly T. Klein, Diana Hulsey, Paul Daley, 2013; A PRELIMINARY REPORT OF Mescaline concentrations in small regrowth crowns vs. mature crowns of Lophophora williamsii (Cactaceae): cultural, economic, and conservation implications; J. Bot. Res. Inst. Texas 7(1): 435 – 440. The Economist, 3 April 1999, A Field Full Of Buttons. Viesca Trevino, C., J. Ramon de la Fuente, et al. (1993). Ethnotaxonomy and ethnopharmacology of psychoactive drug of ancient mexico. International conference of Ethnomedicine Heidelberg. Author’s Notes: 1. - Chichimeca, a former culture native to central México, its main tribes were: Huachichiles, Pame, Guamares and Zacatecos. 2. - Cora, are an ethnic group that lives in the mountains of Nayarit, and more precisely in the municipality of El Nayar, in the eastern state of Nayarit (Mexico). They also have settlements in the state of Jalisco, Nayarit neighbor. The Coras are named themselves nayeeri. 3. - Huichol; constitute a majority in Tepic and most of Nayarit, known in Spanish as Huichol inhabit west-central México in the Sierra Madre Occidental, mainly in the states of Jalisco , Nayarit and Durango and Zacatecas parts. They call themselves wixárika. 4. - Native American Church, is an indigenous group that promotes religious worship peyote consumption and as medicine mainly its name is abbreviated as "NAC". 5. - Endemic, Endemism is a term used in biology to indicate the range of a taxon is limited to a small geographical area and not found naturally anywhere else in the world. So when it indicates that a species is endemic to a certain region, it means that you can only find in a natural way there. 6. - Tarahumara, Tarahumara or Raramuri are a native people of México, settled in the territory of the state of Chihuahua, his endonym is rarámuri. 7. - The tepehuanes are a grouping of native peoples of México, in the states of Chihuahua and Zacatecas. 8. - A plant entheogen is a substance or a preparation plant substances with psychoactive properties that when ingested causes an altered state of consciousness. Used in spiritual contexts, religious, ritualistic and shamanic besides creative uses, recreational or medical. 9. - Comanches, are a Native American tribe native to Comancheria (territory which would include eastern New México, southeastern Colorado and Kansas, all of Oklahoma and quite the Northeast and Southeast Texas). 10. - The Kickapoo are an Algonquian Native American people living in the northern state of Coahuila and in the mountainous area of Sonora (México) and in Oklahoma, Kansas and Texas in the United States. 11. - The Kiowa tribe is one of the nations of Native Americans in the United States who lived primarily in the plains of West Texas, Oklahoma and eastern New México. 12. - Mescalero (or Mescalero Apache); is a native tribe of Southern Athabaskan root, currently living on the Mescalero Apache Indian Reservation in south central New México, United States. 13. – Apache; is a name given to a group of culturally indigenous nations near eastern Arizona, northwestern México (northern states of Sonora and Chihuahua), New México, and parts of Texas and the Great Plains.
Recommended publications
  • Univerzita Palackého V Olomouci Přírodovědecká Fakulta Katedra Botaniky Rod Lophophora J. M. Coult. II. Fylogeneze Rodu

    Univerzita Palackého V Olomouci Přírodovědecká Fakulta Katedra Botaniky Rod Lophophora J. M. Coult. II. Fylogeneze Rodu

    Univerzita Palackého v Olomouci Přírodovědecká fakulta Katedra botaniky Rod Lophophora J. M. Coult. II. Fylogeneze rodu a molekulární charakterizace druhů Bc. Barbora Sasáková Diplomová práce Studijní obor: Botanika Forma studia: Prezenční Vedoucí práce: RNDr. Ľuboš Majeský, Ph.D. Olomouc 2018 ©Barbora Sasáková, 2018 Poděkování: Ráda bych poděkovala Vojtěchu Myšákovi, Jaroslavu Bohatovi a Jaroslavu Šnicerovi za pomoc s taxonomickou validací vzorků a přínosné poznatky o rodě Lophophora. Dále také Ing. Markétě Dobré za pomoc při tvorbě mapových výstupů a v neposlední řadě vedoucímu mé práce RNDr. Ľuboši Majeskému, Ph.D. za odborné vedení při práci v laboratoři a při psaní práce. Tuto práci bych ráda věnovala in memoriam Ing. Rudolfu Grymovi, který byl významným odborníkem na rod Lophophora, jehož dvě monografie zabývající se rodem jsou velice přínosné a poměrná část mé práce vychází právě z nich. Bibliografická identifikace: Jméno a příjmení autora: Bc. Barbora Sasáková Název práce: Rod Lophophora J. M. Coult. II. Fylogeneze rodu a molekulární charakterizace druhů Typ práce: Diplomová práce Pracoviště: Katedra botaniky, PřF UP v Olomouci, Česká republika Vedoucí práce: RNDr. Ľuboš Majeský Ph.D. Rok obhajoby práce: 2018 Abstrakt Rod Lophophora je druhově nepočetný rod nenápadných kulovitých bezostných kaktusů s areálem sahajícím od jižního Texasu (USA) až po stát Querétaro (Mexiko). V současné době se rod dělí na dvě sekce. V sekci Diffusae se rozlišují čtyři druhy L. alberto-vojtechii, L. diffusa, L. fricii, L. koehresii. Do sekce Lophophora se řadí jeden polymorfní druh L. williamsii. Takovéto systematické členění rodu je ale povětšinou ignorováno odbornou veřejností a v odborné literatuře se lze setkat s názory, že rod obsahuje jenom dva druhy, jižní typ – L.
  • Stalking the Wild Lophophora PART 3 San Luis Potosí (Central), Querétaro, and Mexico City

    Stalking the Wild Lophophora PART 3 San Luis Potosí (Central), Querétaro, and Mexico City

    MARTIN TERRY Stalking the wild Lophophora PART 3 San Luis Potosí (central), Querétaro, and Mexico City e continued south on High- ticular—before retreating into the brush. It was way 101, leaving Tamau- not an appealing environment to spend time in, lipas and entering San and as soon as we had collected our samples and Luis Potosí just before we taken our photos, we left, heading further east- hit Highway 80, on which ward on Highway 80. we turned east toward El We stopped after a short distance to check Huizache. The latter is a a friend’s GPS record of what was reported village at the intersection to be “L. williamsii.” And we did indeed find of Highways 57 and 80. It is also the landmark Lophophora there, on both sides of the highway, Wfor the population that Ted Anderson selected as but it was L. koehresii, not L. williamsii. This the source of his neotype specimen to represent was another mud-flat population, and while the the species Lophophora williamsii. I had visited plants were not exactly abundant, we were able this population in 2001, and it was immediate- to find enough to meet our quota of tissue sam- ly apparent, now six years later, that the popula- ples without difficulty. Here again, there was no tion had undergone some changes for the worse. evidence that the L. koehresii had been harvest- There was evidence that plants were being dug ed, despite the fact that it was a heavily traf- up entire (including the roots, as opposed to the ficked area with much human activity.
  • A Tale of Two Cacti –The Complex Relationship Between Peyote (Lophophora Williamsii) and Endangered Star Cactus (Astrophytum Asterias)

    A Tale of Two Cacti –The Complex Relationship Between Peyote (Lophophora Williamsii) and Endangered Star Cactus (Astrophytum Asterias)

    A Tale of Two Cacti –The Complex Relationship between Peyote (Lophophora williamsii) and Endangered Star Cactus (Astrophytum asterias). 1 2 2 TERRY, M. , D. PRICE , AND J. POOLE. 1Sul Ross State University, Department of Biology, Alpine, Texas 79832. 2Texas Parks and Wildlife Department, Wildlife Diversity Branch, 3000 S. IH-35, Suite 100, Austin, Texas 78704. ABSTRACT Astrophytum asterias, commonly called star cactus, is a federally listed endangered cactus endemic to the Tamaulipan thornscrub ecoregion of extreme southern Texas, USA, and Tamaulipas and Nuevo Leon, Mexico. Only three metapopulations totaling less than 4000 plants are presently known in Texas. Star cactus, known locally as “star peyote”, is highly sought by collectors. This small, dome-shaped, spineless, eight- ribbed cactus is sometimes mistaken for peyote (Lophophora williamsii), which grows in the same or adjacent habitats. Peyote is harvested from native thornscrub habitats in Texas by local Hispanic people and sold to peyoteros, licensed distributors who sell the peyote to Native American Church members. Annual peyote harvests in Texas approach 2,000,000 “buttons” (crowns). Although the peyoteros do not buy star cactus from harvesters, they cultivate star cactus in peyote gardens at their places of business and give star cacti to their customers as lagniappe. If even 0.1% of harvested “peyote” is actually star cactus, the annual take of this endangered cactus approaches the total number of wild specimens known in the U.S. This real but unquantifiable take, together with information from interviews with local residents, suggests the existence of many more star cactus populations than have been documented. ASTROPHYTUM AND LOPHOPHORA – Poole 1990).
  • Reproductive Ecology of Opuntia Macrocentra (Cactaceae) in the Northern Chihuahuan Desert Author(S): Maria C

    Reproductive Ecology of Opuntia Macrocentra (Cactaceae) in the Northern Chihuahuan Desert Author(S): Maria C

    Reproductive Ecology of Opuntia macrocentra (Cactaceae) in the Northern Chihuahuan Desert Author(s): Maria C. Mandujano Jordan Golubov Laura Huenneke Source: The American Midland Naturalist, 169(2):274-285. 2013. Published By: University of Notre Dame URL: http://www.bioone.org/doi/full/10.1674/0003-0031-169.2.274 BioOne (www.bioone.org) is a nonprofit, online aggregation of core research in the biological, ecological, and environmental sciences. BioOne provides a sustainable online platform for over 170 journals and books published by nonprofit societies, associations, museums, institutions, and presses. Your use of this PDF, the BioOne Web site, and all posted and associated content indicates your acceptance of BioOne’s Terms of Use, available at www.bioone.org/page/terms_of_use. Usage of BioOne content is strictly limited to personal, educational, and non-commercial use. Commercial inquiries or rights and permissions requests should be directed to the individual publisher as copyright holder. BioOne sees sustainable scholarly publishing as an inherently collaborative enterprise connecting authors, nonprofit publishers, academic institutions, research libraries, and research funders in the common goal of maximizing access to critical research. Am. Midl. Nat. (2013) 169:274–285 Reproductive Ecology of Opuntia macrocentra (Cactaceae) in the Northern Chihuahuan Desert MARIA C. MANDUJANO Instituto de Ecologı´a, Departamento de Ecologı´a de la Biodiversidad, Universidad Nacional Auto´noma de Me´xico, Apartado Postal 70-275, 04510 D. F., Me´xico JORDAN GOLUBOV* Departamento El Hombre y Su Ambiente-CBS-Universidad Auto´noma Metropolitana-Xochimilco, Calzada del Hueso 1100, Col. Villa Quietud, 04960, Me´xico, D. F. AND LAURA HUENNEKE College of Arts & Science, Northern Arizona University, P.
  • Evaluación Del Estado De Conservación Del Peyote Queretano Lophophora Diffusa Croizat (Bravo), Cactácea Endémica Del Desierto Querétaro-Hidalguense, México

    Evaluación Del Estado De Conservación Del Peyote Queretano Lophophora Diffusa Croizat (Bravo), Cactácea Endémica Del Desierto Querétaro-Hidalguense, México

    68 Cact Suc Mex (2012) 57(3):68-85 Evaluación del estado de conservación del peyote queretano Lophophora diffusa Croizat (Bravo), cactácea endémica del desierto Querétaro-Hidalguense, México Díaz-Segura Omar1*, Jiménez-Sierra Cecilia Leonor1*, Matías-Palafox María Loraine1 & Vázquez-Díaz Erasmo1 Resumen El “peyote queretano”, Lophophora diffusa, es una cactácea endémica de la región semiárida Querétaro-Hidalguense. Las poblaciones de esta especie son mermadas por el saqueo directo de individuos debido a sus supuestas propiedades químicas y curativas. Además, los sitios en donde habita están sujetos a transformaciones constantes por cambios de uso del suelo. La especie es señalada como amenazada (A) en la NOM-059-SEMARNAT-2010, como vulnerable (Vu) en la Lista Roja de la UICN y está incluida en el Apéndice ll de CITES. Sin embargo, la asignación de estas categorías ha sido un tanto subjetiva debido a la carencia de información sobre muchos aspectos de la biología de la especie. En este trabajo se aplicó el Método de Evaluación del Riesgo de Extinción de las Especies Silvestres en México (MER) (Anexo I de la NOM-059-SEMARNAT-2010) con el fin de justificar la re-categorización deL. diffusa como especie en peligro de extinción (P). Palabras clave: Conservación, disturbio, especie en peligro, MER, Peyote. Abstract The “peyote queretano” Lophophora diffusa, is an endemic cactus from the semiarid region Queretaro-Hidalguense. Their populations have decreased by direct plunder of individuals due to their supposed healing and chemical properties. In addition, sites are subject to constant changes in land use. The species is designated as threatened (A) in the NOM-059-SEMARNAT-2010, as Vulnerable (VU) in the IUCN Red List and is listed in Appendix II of CITES.
  • Stalking the Wild Lophophora PART 1 Chihuahua and Coahuila

    Stalking the Wild Lophophora PART 1 Chihuahua and Coahuila

    MARTIN TERRY Stalking the wild Lophophora PART 1 Chihuahua and Coahuila Ay, Chihuahua! ul Ross State University gradu- ate student Robert Hibbitts and I set off in my old Dodge truck from Alpine, Texas, in late May and crossed into Mexico at Presidio- Ojinaga, which is the only official border crossing between El Paso, at the westernmost corner of Texas, and Del Rio, some 500 miles downstream. Presi- Sdio, Texas is a town of about 3000 souls. Ojina- ga, on the Chihuahua side, is considerably larg- er, famous for its delicious asadero cheese and its high murder rate. From here a scenic two- lane, Mexican Highway 16, winds through the massive mountains of northern Chihuahua to the state capital, Ciudad Chihuahua, where we arrived on the campus of the agricultural school of the Autonomous University of Chihuahua on the southwestern edge of the city. Hoping to receive guidance with regard to the exact loca- tions of populations of Lophophora williamsii on the western edge of its range (and also of the range of the genus), we were disappointed to learn that no one had managed to locate a single Lophophora population in the state—valuable information nonetheless. Contrary to the report of Robert Bye, quoting anonymous sources sug- gesting that Lophophora occurred in “the hills west of Chihuahua City”1, Dr Toutcha Zebgue told us that such an occurrence was extreme- ly unlikely. Not only had peyote not been found there, but the geology was all wrong: igneous rock, rather than the limestone normally pre- ferred by Peyote. Disappointed but undaunted, we headed south- , On a limestone mountainside south of Viesca, Coahuila we found a montane population of L.
  • Shaun's Cacti

    Shaun's Cacti

    TheCactus Explorer The first free on-line Journal for Cactus and Succulent Enthusiasts Mammillaria luethyi Gasteria rawlinsonii Number 3 Echeveria penduliflora ISSN 2048-0482 Obregonia denegrii February 2012 Uebelmannia ‘eriocactoides’ The Cactus Explorer ISSN 2048-0482 Number 3 February 2012 In thIs EdItIon Regular Features Articles Introduction 3 Gasteria rawlinsonii in the Baviaanskloof 26 News and Events 4 Mammillaria luethyi. In search of a botanical Thank you John (Pilbeam) 8 jewel from Mexico 30 Recent New Descriptions 13 My search for Obregonia denegrii 37 Lophophora alberto-vojtechii 16 Melocactus on two Caribbean Islands 43 In the Glasshouse 18 Why Echeveria penduliflora? 47 Journal Roundup 22 Travel with the cactus expert (2) 50 The Love of Books 24 Uebelmannia pectinifera var. eriocactoides 54 Society Page 64 Expedition to Socotra, 1967 58 Retail Therapy 65 The No.1 source for on-line information about cacti and succulents is http://www.cactus-mall.com New link for Gymnocalycium enthusiasts (French): http://gymnocalycium.free.fr/index.php Cover Picture: Mammillaria luethyi PH914.06, possibly several plants or a small cluster. See the article on Page 30. Photo: Paul Hoxey. Invitation to Contributors Please consider the Cactus Explorer as the place to publish your articles. We welcome contributions for any of the regular features or a longer article with pictures on any aspect of cacti and succulents. The editorial team is happy to help you with preparing your work. Please send your submissions as plain text in a ‘Word’ document together with separate jpeg or tiff images with the maximum resolution available, at least 1200 x 800 pixels.
  • Lophophora Williamsii) En Cuatrociénegas, México

    Lophophora Williamsii) En Cuatrociénegas, México

    36 Cact Suc Mex (2010) 55(2):36-55 Patrón de distribución espacial y nodricismo del peyote (Lophophora williamsii) en Cuatrociénegas, México García Naranjo Ortiz de la Huerta Alejandra1,2 & Mandujano María del Carmen1* Resumen En este trabajo se estudió el patrón de distribución espacial de Lophophora williamsii (“peyote”) en Cuatrociénegas, Desierto Chihuahuense. La especie presenta una amplia distribución en esta región y algunas de sus poblaciones se encuentran amenazadas por la colecta. Se exploró si L. williamsii se establece en microhabitats proporcionados por el dosel de otras especies conocidas como “planta nodriza”. En 3 parcelas de 100 m2 se mapearon y censaron todos los individuos de peyote. A cada planta se le contó el número de tallos (cabezuelas) y se identificó si el individuo se asociaba a alguna planta nodriza. Las potenciales especies nodriza fueron determinadas taxonómicamente y se les midió su tamaño. Asimismo se evaluó si existe preferencia en el establecimiento bajo la sombra de las nodrizas en alguna orientación azimut. El peyote presenta un patrón de distribución de tipo agregado alrededor de centros de vegetación. El 91% de las plantas se encuentran asociadas a alguna nodriza y las más importantes fueron Larrea tridentata (65%), Acacia sp. (3%) y Cordia parvifolia. El análisis de residuos ajustados indica que hay preferencia por estas especies y hay menos individuos en los espacios abiertos (P<0.0001). La densidad de peyotes es de x` =0.35 ind/m2, los individuos tienen de 1-34 cabezuelas (x` = 3 ± 1.7) y el 74% de éstas tienen 4-6 cm de diámetro. L.
  • Comparative Survey of Lophophora Williamsii Populations in the Usa and Peyote Harvesting Guidelines

    Comparative Survey of Lophophora Williamsii Populations in the Usa and Peyote Harvesting Guidelines

    ________________________________________________________________________________________________www.neip.info COMPARATIVE SURVEY OF LOPHOPHORA WILLIAMSII POPULATIONS IN THE USA AND PEYOTE HARVESTING GUIDELINES Anna Ermakova CID: 01615602 August 2019 A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science and the Diploma of Imperial College London Formatted in the journal style of Conservation Biology. Submitted for the MSc in 2019 ________________________________________________________________________________________________www.neip.info DECLARATION OF OWN WORK I declare that this thesis, “Comparative survey of Lophophora williamsii populations in the USA and peyote Harvesting Guidelines”, is entirely my own work, and that where material could be construed as the work of others, it is fully cited and referenced, and/or with appropriate acknowledgement given. Signature Name of student: Anna Ermakova Name of Supervisors: Colin Clubbe, Martin Terry ii ________________________________________________________________________________________________www.neip.info WORD COUNT Word Count: 5985 (excluding abstract in Spanish). iii ________________________________________________________________________________________________www.neip.info LIST OF ACRONYMS CCI – Cactus Conservation Institute CSA – Controlled Substances Act DEM – Digital elevation model GIS – Geographic information system GLIMMIX – Generalized linear mixed models GLM – General Linear Model GPS – Global positioning system ICL: Imperial College
  • Index Článků a Vyobrazení V Časopisu Kaktusy 1994–2016 Kaktusy LIII

    Index Článků a Vyobrazení V Časopisu Kaktusy 1994–2016 Kaktusy LIII

    ISSN 0862-4372 2017 kaktusy speciální příloha Index článků a vyobrazení v časopisu Kaktusy 1994–2016 kaktusy LIII. ročník Index článků a vyobrazení 2017 v časopisu Kaktusy speciální příloha Vydává 1994–2016 Společnost českých a slovenských pěstitelů kaktusů a sukulentů, z. s., IČ: 00566268 Jozef Vanko & Jiří Štembera Scheinerova 20, 628 00 Brno [email protected] | [email protected] bankovní konto 2000480146/2010 (Česká republika), 2000480146/8330 (Slovensko) Vážení čtenáři, bankovní konto pro zahraničí Account № 2700480147/2010 zdá se to až neuvěřitelné, ale časopis Kaktusy právě završuje svůj LIII. ročník. Do roku IBAN – CZ8320100000002700480147 1994 vycházel 6x ročně po 24 stranách, což zřejmě bylo v době po Sametové revoluci SWIFT/BIC – FIOBCZPPXXX Předseda: neúnosné, protože kvasící demokracie s sebou nesla i negativní jevy, s kterými nikdo Ing. JAROSLAV VÍCH Osvobození 272, 747 24 Chuchelná z nás nepočítal. Jedním z nich byl i odliv zájmu i členů kaktusářských organizací, časopis tel.: 603 494 721 vycházel s velkým zpožděním, což bylo u periodika, které mělo spojovat a stmelovat [email protected] Jednatel: členskou základnu, dost nepříjemné. Z toho důvodu přistoupilo vedení Společnosti Ing. IVAN BĚŤÁK na podzim roku 1993 k rozhodnutí o novém modelu časopisu, jmenovalo novou Pod Lesem 27 143 00 Praha 4-Komořany redakční radu a redaktora a časopis začal vycházet 4x ročně po 32 stranách. Nejdříve tel.: 241 765 942, 605 929 930 16 stran plnobarevných a 16 černobílých (do roku 1993 se barevné fotografie tiskly [email protected] Hospodář: zvlášť a čtenáři si obrázky vlepovali), později, když bylo vidět, že tento model se osvědčil, Ing.
  • From Cacti to Carnivores: Improved Phylotranscriptomic Sampling And

    From Cacti to Carnivores: Improved Phylotranscriptomic Sampling And

    Article Type: Special Issue Article RESEARCH ARTICLE INVITED SPECIAL ARTICLE For the Special Issue: Using and Navigating the Plant Tree of Life Short Title: Walker et al.—Phylotranscriptomic analysis of Caryophyllales From cacti to carnivores: Improved phylotranscriptomic sampling and hierarchical homology inference provide further insight into the evolution of Caryophyllales Joseph F. Walker1,13, Ya Yang2, Tao Feng3, Alfonso Timoneda3, Jessica Mikenas4,5, Vera Hutchison4, Caroline Edwards4, Ning Wang1, Sonia Ahluwalia1, Julia Olivieri4,6, Nathanael Walker-Hale7, Lucas C. Majure8, Raúl Puente8, Gudrun Kadereit9,10, Maximilian Lauterbach9,10, Urs Eggli11, Hilda Flores-Olvera12, Helga Ochoterena12, Samuel F. Brockington3, Michael J. Moore,4 and Stephen A. Smith1,13 Manuscript received 13 October 2017; revision accepted 4 January 2018. 1 Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, University of Michigan, 830 North University Avenue, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1048 USA 2 Department of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of Minnesota-Twin Cities, 1445 Gortner Avenue, St. Paul, MN 55108 USA 3 Department of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EA, UK 4 Department of Biology, Oberlin College, Science Center K111, 119 Woodland Street, Oberlin, OH 44074-1097 USA 5 Current address: USGS Canyonlands Research Station, Southwest Biological Science Center, 2290 S West Resource Blvd, Moab, UT 84532 USA 6 Institute of Computational and Mathematical Engineering (ICME), Stanford University, 475 Author Manuscript Via Ortega, Suite B060, Stanford, CA, 94305-4042 USA This is the author manuscript accepted for publication and has undergone full peer review but has not been through the copyediting, typesetting, pagination and proofreading process, which may lead to differences between this version and the Version of Record.
  • San Gabriel Valley Cactus and Succulent Society Cactus of the Month June 2001 Ð Turbinicarpus

    San Gabriel Valley Cactus and Succulent Society Cactus of the Month June 2001 Ð Turbinicarpus

    San Gabriel Valley Cactus and Succulent Society Cactus of the Month June 2001 – Turbinicarpus Turbinicarpus is a small genus of small plants from Northeastern and Central Mexico. It is one of several closely related genera, Neolloydia, and Gymno-cactus, and Strombocactus being the ones most frequently mentioned. In many books, the plants listed below will appear as either Neolloydia or Gymnocactus. The exact relation of these genera is still being worked out. New species have been discovered and named in the past decade; seeds and plants of these are just becoming available. All of the Turbinicarpus species are worth growing. They are small, most full-sized in collections at an inch or two. A few will clump readily, and make impressive show specimens, but still remain manageable. A collection of all the species and varieties could easily fit on a table top. Figure Turbinicarpus pseudopectinatus Turbinicarpus are fairly easy to grow, if attention is paid to their life cycle. They are dormant in winter, from November through mid-March. As they begin growth, watering has to start slowly. If too much water and fertilizer are given at once, the inside will swell faster than the skin can grow, and Figure its possible to split the skin of the plant. Once growth is going (April and after) water freely. Turbincarpus schmiedickeanus v. schwarzii During very hot weather in the summer, the plants In habitat Turbinicarpus usually grow under nurse sometimes go dormant again for a short period. plants, generally shrubs that offer some protection Attention has to be paid to watering again.