Toltec Warriors

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Toltec Warriors 34 RES 42 AUTUMN 2002 4. Figure Toltec warriors. a. Tikal, Stela 31, Yax Nun Ayin. Detail, left side. Courtesy Tikal Project, University Museum, University of Pennsylvania. Toltec CLEMENCYCOGGINS D?sir?e Charnay, French expeditionary photographer, Most scholars, especially historians and archaeologists, even in of impelled by a European fascination with heroic travel, have accepted Charnay's conclusions, light Aztec discovery, and recording of antiquities in the New the known propensity of the for rewriting history, were to rest at a on World, raised money to follow the legendary journey of and doubts officially laid conference Quetzalcoatl from Tula,1 in the Mexican state of Tula, in 1941 inMexico (L?pez Austin 1989:32). There, common-sense of Hidalgo, to the east (Charnay 1887). In his quest for the the idea that the magnificent Tollan was was a truth behind the legend of this iconic feathered serpent, Aztec history Teotihuacan over-ridden by on Charnay defined what would become the longest majority of the eminent conferees who focused the running debate in ancient Mesoamerican history and reality of Tula, Hidalgo, and its specific role in the Aztec about the archaeology. Beginning at Tula, Hidalgo, Charnay ended histories. Because of apparent certainty dating his travels 800 miles to the southeast, at Chich?n Itz?, in and identity of the historical Tula, derived from these Yucat?n, where he noticed serpent columns and a ball sources, itwas also generally accepted that Chich?n so court ring that closely resembled some he had seen at Itz?, which resembled Tula, ancient capital of the was its Tula (fig. 1; map).2 This led him to research the Toltec, civilized world, remote, contemporary foreign ancient inhabitants of Tula, and Quetzalcoatl, their colony. This view was convincingly demonstrated by feathered-serpent god-king. Reading sixteenth century the portraits of dozens of certifiable Toltec warriors central Mexican Aztec accounts, Charnay found the portrayed with their characteristic weapons in the relief Toltec were believed to have created civilization, and sculpture of both Tula and Chich?n Itz?. that, historically, they had invaded the Maya regions. He saw Toltec accomplishments as "excellent, graceful, and Toltec, In the following overview of the debate delicate" (82) and was confident "no human blood ever about Chich?n Itz? and Tula Iwill concentrate on the art stained their altar, their offerings consisting of fruits, historical and archaeological points of view, seeking flowers, and birds" (88). Eventually, he concluded that cultural constants found at these two places and all Mesoamerican ruins were Toltec; that they were not elsewhere much earlier, might be described As Toltec. very old, and that Tula, Hidalgo, had been their capital. Apparently consistent throughout at least thirteen Thus, he insisted on the unity of Mesoamerican culture. centuries (a.d. 200-1500), and many central Mexican If he had other less probable notions, they were standard penetrations into Maya regions, was a Toltec ideal that for the period, and his insights about theTula-Chich?n epitomized the primordial Toltecs of Tollan?the source axis have not gone out of style, as we shall see. of wisdom and inventors of the calendar, or creators of civilization, the arts and sciences (Davies 1977:416). "The Nahuas of the time to the Tula and Chich?n Itz? just prior Conquest associated Toltec?yotl [Toltecness] with everything Lindsay Jones, in the book Twin City Tales, analyzes superlative in their culture [Itwas] the summing up of the relationship between Tula and Chich?n Itz? from the ancient wisdom and art" (L?on-Portilla 1963:79, 80). was point of view of comparative religion, describing "the Tollan seen as the first city by the Aztec tlamatini, as infamous sister-city semblance" [noted above, as] "the Teotihuacan would have been by the Toltec of Tula burnt-over district of Mesoamerican studies" (1995:13). Hidalgo, thus representing the urban, and exemplifying civilization. "In native thought Tollan was the source of all legitimate power... all legitimate rulers needed I am Tollan ancestors" (Feldman 1974:150). Toltec meant to especially grateful for the invaluable comments and suggestions ofWilliam Ringle, Leonardo L?pez Lujan,Miguel P?rez be learned in the historic tradition, calendar and the David and an Negrete, Virginia Miller, Shannon Plank, Stuart, "loftiest theological ideas" (L?on-Portilla 1963:79), as anonymous reviewer. was true of the N?huatl word tlamatini?the wise men 1. In this paper, the place name "Tula" refers to Tula, Hidalgo; who personified writing and wisdom, analogous to the "Tollan" refers first to Teotihuacan, to other places considered to have Yucatecan word ah its'at, for a wise man. Toltec also been Tollans, and to the "legendary" Tollan. 2. meant to be in The discovery, hypothesis formation, and photographic knowledgeable every facet of the noble documentation took two trips. life, including, and especially, military prowess. The 36 RES 42 AUTUMN 2002 TOLTEC COLUMN IN THE CASTILLO. TOLTEC COLUMN AT TtlLA. Figure 1. Columns at Chich?n Itz? and Tula. From Charnay 1887:343. at word Toltec?yotl, however, has usually described the city, by their descendants Tula, Hidalgo, and finally by extraordinary artistic and literary skills of the Toltec their descendants atTenochtitlan?although this cultural (L?on-Portilla 1963:167-176; L?on-Portilla 1980), continuity took different forms at different times and was whereas in this paper, which considers Toltec traits that places.3 The Toltec ideal which transmitted from a.d. to be traced originated at Teotihuacan about 200 and spread elite father elite son, may archaeologically of throughout Mesoamerica, Toltec?yotl is not used for lack through itswarrior society and associated evidence storm an of archaeological evidence of such creativity abroad. god and calendric ritual, intertwined with a Instead, "Toltec" will describe the ideal of rulership that evolving role for Quetzalcoatl that finally, millennium evoked a noble warrior who was learned in the history later, bore little, if any, resemblance to the feathered and priestly duties of Tollan (Sahagun, bk. 8:chs. 17, 20), serpent of the original Tollan. a and who might pursue them in foreign environment where the roles of military officer and director of the Quetzalcoatl: the legend marketplace would also have been essential (bk. 8:ch.19). Such use of Toltec does not assume the concept had Once upon a time there was an old, wise, humble to the mythic complexity or cultural brilliance of itsAztec king given solitary penitential devotions: cold himself with thorns. significance. Nor, indeed, that the third-century-A.D. nocturnal bathing and puncturing measure to feathered serpents of the Pyramid of Quetzalcoatl at He taught his people to write and to time, weave cotton Teotihuacan were intended to evoke the man-god of work gold, jade, and feathers, to grow and as to raise corn cacao. He built Aztec legend. But, more simply, it suggests that of many hues, and and a Teotihuacan's plan was conceived and its pyramids built, four precious houses for fasting and prayer, and temple the foundations of "Toltec" were laid. with serpent columns. But his extraordinary piety on Here, in addition to a characteristic understanding of excited anger among the sorcerers, intent destroying time and the calendar, Toltec refers to qualities of the Toltec. They tricked him into drunken behavior that military and commercial leadership exemplified by and citizens of ancient a traveling emigrating Teotihuacan, 3. Enrique Florescano has recently adopted such long view in by their Epiclassic descendants after the collapse of the Memoria Mexicana (1999:ch. 4). Coggins: Toltec 37 TROPICOFCANCER. 23.5DEGREES NORTH LATITUDE CHALCHIHUITES LAQUEMADA ISLACERRITOS 15DEGREES NORTH LATITUDE PACIFICOCEAN SANTALUCIA /EL SALVADOR Map of Mesoamerica with the Tropic of Cancer and 15 Degrees North Latitude indicated. so shamed him he fled to the east (Sahag?n, bk.3:chs. 3, However, according to Sahag?n, Quetzalcoatl . 4, 12). There, at the edge of the sea, dressed in his "fashioned a raft of serpents [and] set off going divine feathers and turquoise mask, Quetzalcoatl burned across the sea" (fig. 2; bk. 3:ch. 14). Here we lose the himself up and rose into the sky.4 The old people say he mytho-historical Quetzalcoatl, said to have been born became the star that appears at dawn?the Lord of the in the year 1 Reed (understood to be a.d. 843) and to Dawn (Bierhorst 1992:36), or Venus. More variable in have died in year 1 Reed (a.d. 895) after fifty-two are the Aztec accounts those parts of the legend that years or one calendric cycle?a period represented describe Quetzalcoatrs departure from Tollan and his metaphorically by a tied bundle of fifty-two sticks or travels to the Gulf Coast. According to Sahag?n (bk. canes. Many versions of the story of Quetzalcoatl have 3:ch. 12) when Quetzalcoatl left Tollan he buried the survived, but as apotheosized ruler of Tollan and works of art, all the marvelous and costly things; exemplar of civilization his legendary persona and everything else he burned, including his exquisite shimmering spirit have both presided over the houses. He changed the cacao trees to mesquite and theological questions and historical confusion that cloud sent the birds of precious feather to anahuac, the land at Tula, Chich?n Itz?, and Tollan to this day.6 How this the edge of the water. Thus he destroyed the civilization transcendant being was manifest in Toltec, as defined he had created, and headed east, with his people, to here, is the subject of this paper. Tlillan-Tlapallan, place of knowledge, believed to be the Gulf Coast (Sahag?n, bk. 3:ch. 4; bk. 10:ch. 29).5 Fire ritual.
Recommended publications
  • THE CEM ANAHUAC CONQUERORS Guillermo Marín
    THE CEM ANAHUAC CONQUERORS Guillermo Marín Dedicated to the professor and friend Guillermo Bonfil Batalla, who illuminated me in the darkest nights. Tiger that eats in the bowels of the heart, stain its jaws the bloody night, and grows; and diminished grows old he who waits, while far away shines an irremediable fire. Rubén Bonifaz Nuño. Summary: The Cem Ānáhuac conquest has been going on for five centuries in a permanent struggle, sometimes violent and explosive, and most of the time via an underground resistance. The military conquest began by Nahua peoples of the Highlands as Spanish allies in 1521. At the fall of Tenochtitlan by Ixtlilxóchitl, the Spanish advance, throughout the territory, was made up by a small group of Spaniards and a large army composed of Nahua troops. The idea that at the fall of Tenochtitlan the entire Cem Anahuac fell is false. During the 16th century the military force and strategies were a combination of the Anahuaca and European knowledge, because both, during the Viceroyalty and in the Mexican Republic, anahuacas rebellions have been constant and bloody, the conquest has not concluded, the struggle continues. During the Spanish colony and the two centuries of Creole neo-colonialism, the troop of all armies were and continues to be, essentially composed of anahuacas. 1. The warrior and the Toltecáyotl Flowered Battle. Many peoples of the different ancient cultures and civilizations used the "Warrior" figure metaphorically. The human being who fights against the worst enemy: that dark being that dwells in the personal depths. A fight against weaknesses, errors and personal flaws, as the Jihad in the Islam religion.
    [Show full text]
  • Ancient Tollan: the Sacred Precinct
    100 RES 38 AUTUMN 2000 Figure 12. Upper section of Pillar 3: Personage with attributes of Tezcatlipoca. Photograph: Humberto Hiera. Ancient Toi Ian The sacred precinct ALBAGUADALUPE MASTACHE and ROBERTH. COBEAN Tula, along with Teotihuacan and Tenochtitlan, was to level the area for the plaza and to construct platforms one most of the important cities inMexico's Central that functioned as bases for buildings. Highlands. During Tula's apogee between a.d. 900-1150, It is evident that at Tula the placement of the area the city covered nearly 16 square kilometers. Its of monumental center is strategic, not only because it over an influence extended much of Central Mexico along occupies easily defended place but also because of its with other regions of Mesoamerica, including areas of central setting at a dominant point that had great visual the Baj?o, the Huasteca, the Gulf Coast, the Yucatan impact, being visible to inhabitants in every part of the city peninsula, and such distant places as the Soconusco, on and within view of many rural sites. Lefebvre observes that the Pacific Coast of Chiapas and Guatemala, and El a city's habitational zone ismade on a human scale, a Salvador. From cultural and ethnic perspective, Tula whereas the monumental zone has a superhuman scale, a constituted synthesis of principally two different which goes beyond human beings?overwhelming them, traditions: the preceding urban culture from Teotihuacan dazzling them. The monumental buildings' scale is the in the Basin of Mexico, and another tradition from the scale of divinity, of a divine ruler, of abstract institutions northern Mesoamerican periphery, especially the Baj?o that dominate human society (Lefebvre 1982:84).
    [Show full text]
  • Highland Mexico Post Classic Aztec C. Andean South America Social Sciences Department HOLIDAY PARTY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    WEEK OF THE DEAD December 1, 2014 XI Civilization D. New World b. Mesoamerica II: Highland Mexico Post Classic Aztec c. Andean South America Social Sciences Department HOLIDAY PARTY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! This Friday, December 5 6:30 Home of Professor Harold Kerbo 2325 Tierra Drive, Los Osos Potluck!!!! Sign-Up in Department Office Building 47 Room 13d Major Prehistoric Civilizations 3600 B.C. 2000 B.C. 2500 B.C. 1500 B.C. ? Sub Saharan Africa A.D. 1000 3000 B.C. Years Isthmus Yucatan Valley of A.D./B.C. Mexico 1600 1500 + + 1400 + AZTEC 1300 + + 1200 POSTCLASSIC MAYA 1100 + + 1000 TOLTEC 900 + 800 + 700 + + 600 CLASSIC + MAYA 500 + + 400 + + 300 + + 200 + TEOTIHUACAN 100 A.D. + + 0 + + 100 B.C. + + 200 + + 300 + 400 PRE-CLASSIC MAYA 500 + + 600 + + 700 + + 800 + + 900 + + 1000 OLMEC + 1100 + + 1200 + + 1300 + + 1400 + + 1500 + + 1600 Olmec Culture Area (Isthmus of Tehuantepec) La Venta San Lorenzo Formative Culture: The Olmec (1500-500 B.C.) El Mirador Late Pre-Classic 200 B.C. – A.D. 250 El Mirador Pre-Classic Mayan City 300 B.C. to A.D. 250 Cultural Collapse and Abandonment A.D. 250 Tikal: Classic Maya City A.D. 250-850 CHICHEN ITZA Post Classic Maya 2. Mesoamerica II: Highland Mexico i. Teotihuacan: The Classic Period in Highland, Mexico Olmec Teotihuacan: City of the Gods Citadel and Temple of Quetzalcoatl Pyramid of the Sun Avenue of the Dead Pyramid of the Moon Pyramid of the Sun, Teotihuacan No ball courts documented at Teotihuacan Not popular in areas influenced by Teo • Associated with obsidian source • No true writing • True metallurgy by A.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Cambridge University Press 978-1-108-47899-1 — Human Figuration and Fragmentation in Preclassic Mesoamerica Julia Guernsey Index More Information
    Cambridge University Press 978-1-108-47899-1 — Human Figuration and Fragmentation in Preclassic Mesoamerica Julia Guernsey Index More Information Index Note: Page entries in italics refer to illustrations. absence, representational, 48, 66, 148–149 bench figures, 153, 154, 155, 157, 163 Monument 2, 42–43 Achaemenid palace reliefs, 158 Benjamin, Walter, 85 Monument 16, 34 adornment, personal, 49, 54, 60, 79–80, Berdan, Frances, 100 Monument 17, 33,34 127–128 Bilbao. See Cotzumalguapa Monument 21, 33, 33 Afanador-Pujol, Angélica, 62 Blackman Eddy, Belize, 56, 82 Water Dancing Group (Monuments 11, 8, Aguateca, 83 Blomster, Jeffrey, 45, 48, 52–53, 60, 65, 14, 15, 6, and 7), 32, 32,42 Ajú Álvarez, Gloria, 121 95–96, 101, 121–122 Chalchuapa, 102 Aldana, Gerardo, 130 Boggs, Stanley, 39 figurines at, 82, 121 Altar de Sacrificios, 119 Borgia Codex, 129 sculpture at, 146 Alvaro Obregón sculpture, 23–24 Borhegyi, Stephan de, 152 Monument 12, 38,39 ancestors and lineage formation, 52, 72, 137, Borić,Dušan, 77 Chapman, John, 96, 104 149–150 Bourdieu, Pierre, 16, 62, 123 Cheetham, David, 49–50, 56, 59 Angulo, Jorge, 32, 34, 43 Bove, Frederick, 119 Chesson, Meredith, 45 animal spirit companion. See human–animal Braakhuis, H. E. M., 88, 92, 128 Chiapa de Corzo, 54, 130 relationship Bradley, Richard, 129 figurines at, 57–58, 93 animals, representation of breath and vocalization Chichén Itzá, 103 birds, 30, 51, 74, 76,77 in iconography of animals, 72–74 Chilam Balam book of Maní, 89 coatimundi, 148, 152 mouths as site of, 19, 40, 62–63, 70–72, Chilam Balam of Chumayel, 88 dogs, 30, 76,77 73–74 China, 132, 134 felines, 76, 80, 81 Brittain, Marcus, 104, 106 Chinchilla, Oswaldo, 103, 110 on pedestal sculpture, 150–152, 154, 156 Bronson, Bennet, 134 Chocolá, Monument 1, 89, 91 on pottery, 77–79 Broom, Donald, 165 Christenson, Allen, 91, 100, 108, 129 serpents, 30 Brown, M.
    [Show full text]
  • Memorias De Piedra Verde: Miradas Simbólicas De Las Reliquias Toltecas
    Memorias de piedra verde: miradas simbólicas de las reliquias toltecas Stephen Castillo Bernal* Museo Nacional de Antropología, INAH RESUMEN: Las placas de piedra verde son características del periodo Epiclásico (650-900 d.C.), en ellas se encuentran plasmadas las memorias de los guerreros, dignatarios y sacerdotes. Me- diante este texto se realiza un análisis simbólico y contextual de diversas placas recuperadas en los sitios de Xochicalco (650-900 d.C.) y de Tula (900-1200 d.C.), fundamentado en los significados simbólicos y anímicos que los toltecas le asignaron a esta clase de objetos. Al abrigo de la teoría del ritual de Victor Turner [1980, 1988], se avanza en una interpretación alterna de estos objetos, pues se ha asumido que ellos aluden a sacerdotes en estado de trance. Se postula también que los sujetos son representaciones de muertos, depositados como reliquias cargadas de meta-mensajes de tiempos pasados y que aparecen en contextos posteriores, como Tula o Tenochtitlan. PALABRAS CLAVE: Toltecas, piedra verde, reliquias, ancestros, muerte. Memories of green stone: A symbolic look at some Toltec relics ABSTRACT: Green stone slabs are characteristic of the Epiclassic period (650-900 A.D.). On them, warriors, dignitaries and priests were embodied. This paper provides a symbolic and contextual analysis of several of the said plates —in this case— recovered at the sites of Xochicalco (650-900 AD) and Tula (900-1200 AD), focusing specifically on the symbolic and emotional meanings that the Toltecs assigned to this class of object. From the ritual theory of Victor Turner [1980, 1988], an alternative interpretation of these objects is proposed, since it has been assumed that they allude to priests in a state of trance.
    [Show full text]
  • Chalchiuhtlicue)
    GODDESS FIGURE (CHALCHIUHTLICUE) This sculpture was carved from volcanic stone about 1,500 years ago in a city named Teotihuacan, located in central Mexico. Like the monumental architecture of Teotihuacan, this three-foot-tall figure is formed of geometric shapes arranged symmetrically. The stone of this sculpture was originally covered with a thin coat of white plaster c. 250-650 Volcanic stone with and then brightly painted. Where can you see traces of red and traces of pigment green pigment? 36 1/4 x 16 1/4 x 16 inches (92.1 x 41.3 x 40.6 cm) Mexican, Central Mexico, The large block at the top of the figure may be a headdress and was Teotihuacan The Louise and Walter Arensberg Collection, originally painted with colorful designs. The two circular shapes on 1950, 1950-134-282 either side of the face could be earrings or earplugs—decorative rings that are inserted into the earlobe rather than hung from it. FIRST LOOKS The flat, masklike face was once painted red and has two blank, What is the sculpture made of? How do you think it was made? oval eyes and an open mouth shaped like a trapezoid. The figure is Describe the shapes. wearing women’s clothing—a necklace made of rectangular shapes, Which ones are repeated? a fringed blouse called a huipil (wee-PEEL), and a skirt. The large, What colors do you see? strong hands are made of simple, curving shapes, while the wide, flat How is the figure’s face feet are rectangular, like the block on which they stand.
    [Show full text]
  • Teotihuacanos Y Coyotlatelcos En Teotihuacan
    Sobreviviendo al colapso: teotihuacanos y coyotlatelcos en Teotihuacan Natalia MORAGAS SEGURA Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Hidalgo [email protected] Recibido: 19 de diciembre de 2003 Aceptado: 15 de marzo de 2004 RESUMEN El Epiclásico (650-900 d.C.) es uno de los periodos más complejos de la arqueología teotihuacana. Después del colapso de la ciudad se va a desarrollar un nuevo tipo de sociedad en un contexto sociopolítico comple- tamente diferente. Este artículo propone una nueva imagen de la ciudad en la que teotihuacanos y coyotlatel- cos conviven en los restos de una ciudad desacralizada. Palabras clave: Teotihuacan, Epiclásico, coyotlatelco. Surviving collapse: Teotihuacans and Coyotlatelcos in Teotihuacan ABSTRACT The Epiclassic (650-900 A.D.) is one of the most complex periods in Teotihuacan archaeology. After the collapse of the city a new society develops in an absolutely different socio-political context. This paper sug- gests a new picture of the city, with Teotihuacans and Coyotlatelcos living together in the remains of a des- acralized city. Key words: Teotihuacan, Epiclassic, Coyotlatelco. SUMARIO: 1. Introducción. 2. Planteamientos previos. 3. La formulación del Epiclásico y «lo Coyotlatelco» en la Cuenca de México. 4. Algunos conceptos sobre el Complejo Cultural Coyotlatelco. 5. Una revisión de las teorías sobre el colapso teotihuacano. 6. El Epiclásico en Teotihuacan. 7. Referencias bibliográficas. 1. Introducción Este artículo es un breve apunte de algunas de las ideas desarrolladas en mi Tesis Doctoral sobre el cambio cultural en Teotihuacan durante el Epiclásico (Moragas 2003). Las diversas investigaciones realizadas en el último decenio nos permiten analizar algunas de las ideas alrededor de los conceptos tradicionalmente relaciona- dos con el fenómeno del colapso teotihuacano y la conformación de una nueva sociedad.
    [Show full text]
  • Una Revision Preliminar De La Historia De Abaj Takalik
    Popenoe de Hatch, Marion y Christa Schieber de Lavarreda 2001 Una revisión preliminar de la historia de Tak´alik Ab´aj, departamento de Retalhuleu. En XIV Simposio de Investigaciones Arqueológicas en Guatemala, 2000 (editado por J.P. Laporte, A.C. Suasnávar y B. Arroyo), pp.990-1005. Museo Nacional de Arqueología y Etnología, Guatemala (versión digital). 77 UNA REVISIÓN PRELIMINAR DE LA HISTORIA DE TAK´ALIK AB´AJ, DEPARTAMENTO DE RETALHULEU Marion Popenoe de Hatch Christa Schieber de Lavarreda Nuestras recientes investigaciones en Tak´alik Ab´aj se han dirigido hacia resolver una serie de preguntas que nos han interesado por largo tiempo. Este año hemos dirigido nuestra atención a la pregunta más intrigante de todas. En algún momento durante la historia de Tak´alik Ab´aj ocurrió un incidente violento. Muchos de los monumentos de gran tamaño, especialmente los esculpidos en estilo Maya, fueron tirados y destruidos. ¿Quién fue responsable de la violencia en Tak´alik Ab´aj, destruyendo deliberadamente los monumentos, y cuándo ocurrió este evento? Creemos que tenemos la respuesta a esta pregunta y presentaremos el argumento en breve. Otras preguntas que hemos tenido son las siguientes: ¿Quiénes fueron los primeros habitantes de Tak´alik Ab´aj?; ¿Por qué fundaron el sitio en el lugar donde se encuentra?; ¿Cuál era la función de Tak´alik Ab´aj?; ¿Cuántos complejos cerámicos, que representan distintas poblaciones, pueden identificarse a lo largo de la historia de Tak´alik Ab´aj y qué papel jugaron?; ¿Qué cerámica está asociada con las esculturas Olmecas y cuál corresponde a las esculturas Mayas?; ¿Qué relaciones mantuvo Tak´alik Ab´aj con otras regiones a lo largo del tiempo?; ¿Cómo se manifiestan los periodos Preclásico, Clásico y Postclásico en Tak´alik Ab´aj, y cómo están relacionados? Hace un año en este Simposio (Popenoe de Hatch et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Animals and Sacred Mountains: How Ritualized Performances Materialized State-Ideologies at Teotihuacan, Mexico
    Animals and Sacred Mountains: How Ritualized Performances Materialized State-Ideologies at Teotihuacan, Mexico The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters. Sugiyama, Nawa. 2014. Animals and Sacred Mountains: How Citation Ritualized Performances Materialized State-Ideologies at Teotihuacan, Mexico. Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University. Accessed April 17, 2018 4:59:24 PM EDT Citable Link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:12274541 This article was downloaded from Harvard University's DASH Terms of Use repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA (Article begins on next page) $QLPDOVDQG6DFUHG0RXQWDLQV +RZ5LWXDOL]HG3HUIRUPDQFHV0DWHULDOL]HG6WDWH,GHRORJLHVDW7HRWLKXDFDQ0H[LFR $'LVVHUWDWLRQ3UHVHQWHG %\ 1DZD6XJL\DPD WR 7KH'HSDUWPHQWRI$QWKURSRORJ\ LQSDUWLDOIXOILOOPHQWRIWKHUHTXLUHPHQWV IRUWKHGHJUHHRI 'RFWRURI3KLORVRSK\ LQWKHVXEMHFWRI $QWKURSRORJ\ +DUYDUG8QLYHUVLW\ &DPEULGJH0DVVDFKXVHWWV $SULO © 2014 Nawa Sugiyama $OOULJKWVUHVHUYHG 'LVVHUWDWLRQ$GYLVRUV3URIHVVRU:LOOLDP)DVKDQG5LFKDUG0HDGRZ 1DZD6XJL\DPD $QLPDOVDQG6DFUHG0RXQWDLQV +RZ5LWXDOL]HG3HUIRUPDQFHV0DWHULDOL]HG6WDWH,GHRORJLHVDW7HRWLKXDFDQ0H[LFR $%675$&7 +XPDQVKDYHDOZD\VEHHQIDVFLQDWHGE\ZLOGFDUQLYRUHV7KLVKDVOHGWRDXQLTXHLQWHUDFWLRQZLWK WKHVHEHDVWVRQHLQZKLFKWKHVHNH\ILJXUHVSOD\HGDQLPSRUWDQWUROHDVPDLQLFRQVLQVWDWHLPSHULDOLVP
    [Show full text]
  • International Contest
    DESIGN OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PROTECTION SYSTEM FOR THE WEST FACADE OF THE PYRAMID OF THE PLUMED SERPENT, ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE OF TEOTIHUACAN, STATE OF MEXICO. International Contest DESIGN OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PROTECTION SYSTEM FOR THE WEST FACADE OF THE PYRAMID OF THE PLUMED SERPENT, ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE OF TEOTIHUACAN, STATE OF MEXICO 1 DESIGN OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PROTECTION SYSTEM FOR THE WEST FACADE OF THE PYRAMID OF THE PLUMED SERPENT, ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE OF TEOTIHUACAN, STATE OF MEXICO INTRODUCTION The ancient city of Teotihuacan was designated by UNESCO as World Heritage in 1988, which is the archeological site of Mexico that, at this moment receives the largest number of visitors, was the seat of the most influential and complex society that had existed in the Americas. It beginning dates from at least the third century Before Common Era. It reached their apogee period between 150 and 600 of Common Era; the city covered more than 23 square kilometers, with an estimated population of approximately 150.000 inhabitants. Teotihuacan expanded its connections to the present states of Jalisco and Zacatecas, also maintained relationship with cities located in Honduras, Belize and Guatemala in Central America. The city was comprised by more than two thousand architectural complexes and it was arranged in neighborhoods creating one of the greatest urban expressions of ancient world. The metropolis has three large architectural complexes: the Pyramid of the Moon, the Pyramid of the Sun and La Ciudadela. The Pyramid of the Plumed Serpent located at this last complex, is one of the most symbolic buildings of Teotihuacan and of all Ancient Mexico.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter One--Homology
    OUTLINE OF CHAPTER ONE Allurement via Homologized Architecture: Monte Albán as Cosmic Mountain, Microcosm and Sacred Center (Priority I-A)................................................................129 The Layout of the Chapter: From Presumptions of “Religiosity” to Thematic Categories, Diachronic Arguments, and Critical Reflections on the “Sacredness” of Monte Albán............130 I. Monte Albán as “Sacred Space” Par Excellence: Professionalized and Popular Accolades, Affirming Assumptions and Occasional Skepticism……..……………….....…...132 II. Monte Albán as Sacred Space and Cosmic Mountain: A Synchronic View..............................141 A. Monte Albán as Heterogeneous Space and Hierophany: Discovered and/or Humanly Constructed Mountains of Sustenance………………….………..…142 1. Sacred Mountains as a Cross-Cultural Phenomenon: The Intrinsic Sacrality of High Places……………………………………………....………144 2. Sacred Mountains in Mesoamerican Cosmovision and Oaxaca: Altepeme as Sources of Abundance and Conceptions of Polity........................145 a. Altépetl as a “Water Mountain” or “Hill of Sustenance”: The Existential Allure of Cosmic Mountains…………........................146 b. Altépetl as a City-State or Territorial Political Unit: The Hegemonic Utility of Cosmic Mountains……......................................153 3. Sacred Mountains at Monte Albán: Two Key Points about Hierophanies and Cosmic Mountains at the Zapotec Capital..................................................156 a. Altepeme as “Religious Symbols”: Presystematic Ontology and the
    [Show full text]
  • The Olmecas and the Tültecas : a Study in Early Mexican Ethnology and History
    1882.] The Ohneca.t ami the Txdtecas. 19S THE OLMECAS AND THE TÜLTECAS : A STUDY IN EARLY MEXICAN ETHNOLOGY AND HISTORY. BY PHILIPP J. .T. VAIJCNTINI. (Translated from the German by Stephen Salisbury, Jr.) SIXTY years ago the early history of the people of the Nile and the Euphrates was still shrouded in deep obscurity. To-day the veil is rent. We are now taught of their existence and achievements thou- sands of years before the period of written history. Active scientific research has won this victory. Interest has not been wanting, nor has labor been spared, to throw a similar light upon the condition and history of the early people that inhabited the table-lands of Mexico and Central America. For more than three hundred and tlfty years, students have been endeavoring to- solve the mysterious problem, and we might therefore reasonably suppose that the labor would not have been wholly In vain. Unfortunately, however, this seems to be the fact. The steps taken in this directioa have been slow and somevrhat discouraging, and it is almost to be feared, that despite the activity which has been displayed during the last ten years In this ancient province of research, the wished-for goal may never be reached. The reasons must be strong, indeed, to lead us to ao melancholy a conclusion. In the following pages we shall endeavor to bring them before our readers. If we consider the historical material offered to the investigator, it is as regards form almost Identical in both Hemispheres. In each the written record, either modified or amplified by later writers, forms the main substance: in each also monumental inscriptions of various de- signs await translation or decipherment.
    [Show full text]