DOCSLIB.ORG

Registered Voters by Gender and District Province Name

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

REGISTERED VOTERS BY GENDER AND DISTRICT % OF PROVINCIAL PROVINCE NAME MALES % OF MALES FEMALES % OF FEMALES SUB TOTAL TOTAL CENTRAL CHIBOMBO 48,620 47.29% 54,199 52.71% 102,819 15.42% CENTRAL CHISAMBA 19,289 47.47% 21,343 52.53% 40,632 6.10% CENTRAL CHITAMBO 11,720 44.06% 14,879 55.94% 26,599 3.99% CENTRAL ITEZHI-TEZHI 18,713 47.21% 20,928 52.79% 39,641 5.95% CENTRAL KABWE 56,253 47.69% 61,700 52.31% 117,953 17.69% CENTRAL KAPIRI MPOSHI 41,947 46.68% 47,905 53.32% 89,852 13.48% CENTRAL LUANO 10,797 47.33% 12,017 52.67% 22,814 3.42% CENTRAL MKUSHI 26,983 49.52% 27,504 50.48% 54,487 8.17% CENTRAL MUMBWA 35,981 47.73% 39,409 52.27% 75,390 11.31% CENTRAL NGABWE 5,491 48.12% 5,920 51.88% 11,411 1.71% CENTRAL SERENJE 24,487 48.97% 25,513 51.03% 50,000 7.50% CENTRAL SHIBUYUNJI 16,756 47.87% 18,246 52.13% 35,002 5.25% 317,03 7 47.56% 349,563 52.44% 666,600 100.00% % OF PROVINCIAL PROVINCE NAME DISTRICT NAME MALES % OF MALES FEMALES % OF FEMALES SUB TOTAL TOTAL COPPERBELT CHILILABOMBWE 28,058 51.11% 26,835 48.89% 54,893 5.35% COPPERBELT CHINGOLA 58,317 49.81% 58,752 50.19% 117,069 11.41% COPPERBELT KALULUSHI 32,683 50.05% 32,614 49.95% 65,297 6.36% 136,09 COPPERBELT KITWE 0 50.20% 135,024 49.80% 271,114 26.43% COPPERBELT LUANSHYA 42,579 49.69% 43,105 50.31% 85,684 8.35% COPPERBELT LUFWANYAMA 18,023 50.23% 17,855 49.77% 35,878 3.50% COPPERBELT MASAITI 24,601 47.47% 27,219 52.53% 51,820 5.05% COPPERBELT MPONGWE 21,774 48.94% 22,720 51.06% 44,494 4.34% COPPERBELT MUFULIRA 40,577 48.61% 42,896 51.39% 83,473 8.14% 105,12 COPPERBELT NDOLA 3 48.63% 111,052 51.37% 216,175 21.07% 507,82 5 49.50% 518,072 50.50% 1,025,897 100.00% % OF PROVINCIAL PROVINCE NAME DISTRICT NAME MALES % OF MALES FEMALES % OF FEMALES SUB TOTAL TOTAL EASTERN CHADIZA 19,854 44.34% 24,925 55.66% 44,779 5.00% EASTERN CHIPATA 55,530 45.36% 66,903 54.64% 122,433 13.66% EASTERN KATETE 35,335 43.87% 45,217 56.13% 80,552 8.99% EASTERN LUNDAZI 30,045 44.86% 36,927 55.14% 66,972 7.47% EASTERN MAMBWE 21,280 47.15% 23,850 52.85% 45,130 5.03% EASTERN NYIMBA 23,577 44.25% 29,700 55.75% 53,277 5.94% EASTERN PETAUKE 43,601 43.33% 57,020 56.67% 100,621 11.23% EASTERN SINDA 33,536 42.97% 44,506 57.03% 78,042 8.71% EASTERN VUBWI 14,153 50.68% 13,772 49.32% 27,925 3.12% EASTERN CHASEFU 26,683 45.34% 32,164 54.66% 58,847 6.57% EASTERN CHIPANGALI 35,246 50.27% 34,867 49.73% 70,113 7.82% EASTERN KASENENGWA 22,714 43.10% 29,983 56.90% 52,697 5.88% EASTERN LUMEZI 23,331 43.65% 30,120 56.35% 53,451 5.96% EASTERN LUSANGAZI 18,747 45.17% 22,753 54.83% 41,500 4.63% 403,63 2 45.03% 492,707 54.97% 896,339 100.00% % OF PROVINCIAL PROVINCE NAME DISTRICT NAME MALES % OF MALES FEMALES % OF FEMALES SUB TOTAL TOTAL LUAPULA CHEMBE 8,777 47.20% 9,817 52.80% 18,594 3.28% LUAPULA CHIENGE 28,416 43.79% 36,474 56.21% 64,890 11.44% LUAPULA CHIPILI 9,411 47.70% 10,318 52.30% 19,729 3.48% LUAPULA KAWAMBWA 23,168 47.44% 25,669 52.56% 48,837 8.61% LUAPULA LUNGA 7,308 42.11% 10,045 57.89% 17,353 3.06% LUAPULA MANSA 55,911 46.06% 65,479 53.94% 121,390 21.41% LUAPULA MILENGE 9,773 44.04% 12,418 55.96% 22,191 3.91% LUAPULA MWANSABOMBWE 12,675 45.63% 15,103 54.37% 27,778 4.90% LUAPULA MWENSE 24,705 44.91% 30,310 55.09% 55,015 9.70% LUAPULA NCHELENGE 32,930 45.82% 38,936 54.18% 71,866 12.67% LUAPULA SAMFYA 24,270 41.95% 33,586 58.05% 57,856 10.20% LUAPULA CHIFUNABULI 17,226 41.50% 24,278 58.50% 41,504 7.32% 254,57 0 44.90% 312,433 55.10% 567,003 100.00% % OF PROVINCIAL PROVINCE NAME DISTRICT NAME MALES % OF MALES FEMALES % OF FEMALES SUB TOTAL TOTAL LUSAKA CHILANGA 36,005 49.72% 36,404 50.28% 72,409 5.82% LUSAKA CHIRUNDU 13,691 45.62% 16,321 54.38% 30,012 2.41% LUSAKA CHONGWE 45,158 47.70% 49,519 52.30% 94,677 7.61% LUSAKA KAFUE 37,744 47.92% 41,021 52.08% 78,765 6.33% LUSAKA LUANGWA 6,481 45.36% 7,807 54.64% 14,288 1.15% 448,02 LUSAKA LUSAKA 0 48.27% 480,110 51.73% 928,130 74.63% LUSAKA RUFUNSA 11,828 46.68% 13,510 53.32% 25,338 2.04% 598,92 7 48.16% 644,692 51.84% 1,243,619 100.00% % OF PROVINCIAL PROVINCE NAME DISTRICT NAME MALES % OF MALES FEMALES % OF FEMALES SUB TOTAL TOTAL MUCHINGA CHAMA 22,902 43.12% 30,211 56.88% 53,113 13.22% MUCHINGA CHINSALI 25,612 47.62% 28,170 52.38% 53,782 13.39% MUCHINGA ISOKA 18,545 47.49% 20,505 52.51% 39,050 9.72% MUCHINGA MAFINGA 16,692 42.38% 22,693 57.62% 39,385 9.81% MUCHINGA MPIKA 29,541 47.50% 32,646 52.50% 62,187 15.48% MUCHINGA NAKONDE 29,994 47.48% 33,184 52.52% 63,178 15.73% MUCHINGA SHIWAN'GANDU 16,611 47.15% 18,622 52.85% 35,233 8.77% MUCHINGA KANCHIBIYA 15,990 45.88% 18,858 54.12% 34,848 8.68% MUCHINGA LAVUSHIMANDA 9,571 45.83% 11,311 54.17% 20,882 5.20% 185,45 8 46.17% 216,200 53.83% 401,658 100.00% % OF PROVINCIAL PROVINCE NAME DISTRICT NAME MALES % OF MALES FEMALES % OF FEMALES SUB TOTAL TOTAL NORTHERN CHILUBI 22,249 42.64% 29,926 57.36% 52,175 8.60% NORTHERN KAPUTA 18,189 46.54% 20,895 53.46% 39,084 6.45% NORTHERN KASAMA 63,511 47.51% 70,181 52.49% 133,692 22.05% NORTHERN LUWINGU 18,001 46.45% 20,752 53.55% 38,753 6.39% NORTHERN MBALA 25,301 46.78% 28,785 53.22% 54,086 8.92% NORTHERN MPOROKOSO 11,884 47.52% 13,122 52.48% 25,006 4.12% NORTHERN MPULUNGU 25,086 45.84% 29,637 54.16% 54,723 9.03% NORTHERN MUNGWI 35,601 45.27% 43,032 54.73% 78,633 12.97% NORTHERN NSAMA 13,370 46.74% 15,232 53.26% 28,602 4.72% NORTHERN SENGA HILL 20,886 46.89% 23,657 53.11% 44,543 7.35% NORTHERN LUNTE 13,387 48.75% 14,075 51.25% 27,462 4.53% NORTHERN LUPOSOSHI 13,291 44.92% 16,296 55.08% 29,587 4.88% 280,75 6 46.30% 325,590 53.70% 606,346 100.00% % OF PROVINCIAL PROVINCE NAME DISTRICT NAME MALES % OF MALES FEMALES % OF FEMALES SUB TOTAL TOTAL NORTH-WESTERN CHAVUMA 9,297 45.14% 11,300 54.86% 20,597 5.33% NORTH-WESTERN IKELENGE 8,335 45.20% 10,106 54.80% 18,441 4.77% NORTH-WESTERN KABOMPO 11,414 45.62% 13,604 54.38% 25,018 6.47% NORTH-WESTERN KASEMPA 17,083 48.33% 18,262 51.67% 35,345 9.14% NORTH-WESTERN MANYINGA 11,241 44.99% 13,743 55.01% 24,984 6.46% NORTH-WESTERN MUFUMBWE 15,022 46.84% 17,048 53.16% 32,070 8.29% NORTH-WESTERN MWINILUNGA 21,896 45.44% 26,292 54.56% 48,188 12.46% NORTH-WESTERN SOLWEZI 37,454 49.04% 38,923 50.96% 76,377 19.75% NORTH-WESTERN ZAMBEZI 16,636 43.79% 21,357 56.21% 37,993 9.83% NORTH-WESTERN KALUMBILA 22,959 48.14% 24,737 51.86% 47,696 12.33% NORTH-WESTERN MUSHINDAMO 9,651 48.33% 10,317 51.67% 19,968 5.16% 180,98 8 46.81% 205,689 53.19% 386,677 100.00% % OF PROVINCIAL PROVINCE NAME DISTRICT NAME MALES % OF MALES FEMALES % OF FEMALES SUB TOTAL TOTAL SOUTHERN CHIKANKATA 17,329 47.07% 19,483 52.93% 36,812 4.71% SOUTHERN CHOMA 48,167 45.82% 56,962 54.18% 105,129 13.44% SOUTHERN GWEMBE 12,074 43.77% 15,509 56.23% 27,583 3.53% SOUTHERN KALOMO 39,031 45.94% 45,933 54.06% 84,964 10.86% SOUTHERN KAZUNGULA 25,795 46.96% 29,131 53.04% 54,926 7.02% SOUTHERN LIVINGSTONE 36,955 47.09% 41,515 52.91% 78,470 10.03% SOUTHERN MAZABUKA 43,048 47.94% 46,755 52.06% 89,803 11.48% SOUTHERN MONZE 46,175 45.49% 55,327 54.51% 101,502 12.98% SOUTHERN NAMWALA 20,238 45.41% 24,328 54.59% 44,566 5.70% SOUTHERN PEMBA 15,557 45.22% 18,846 54.78% 34,403 4.40% SOUTHERN SIAVONGA 12,241 46.61% 14,024 53.39% 26,265 3.36% SOUTHERN SINAZONGWE 27,384 44.41% 34,272 55.59% 61,656 7.88% SOUTHERN ZIMBA 15,924 44.25% 20,064 55.75% 35,988 4.60% 359,91 8 46.02% 422,149 53.98% 782,067 100.00% % OF PROVINCIAL PROVINCE NAME DISTRICT NAME MALES % OF MALES FEMALES % OF FEMALES SUB TOTAL TOTAL WESTERN KALABO 16,417 40.19% 24,433 59.81% 40,850 9.13% WESTERN KAOMA 20,051 43.03% 26,552 56.97% 46,603 10.42% WESTERN LIMULUNGA 8,854 39.74% 13,424 60.26% 22,278 4.98% WESTERN LUAMPA 8,848 40.84% 12,815 59.16% 21,663 4.84% WESTERN LUKULU 12,136 40.92% 17,525 59.08% 29,661 6.63% WESTERN MITETE 6,045 42.78% 8,085 57.22% 14,130 3.16% WESTERN MONGU 28,483 41.60% 39,984 58.40% 68,467 15.31% WESTERN MULOBEZI 6,346 43.09% 8,383 56.91% 14,729 3.29% WESTERN MWANDI 6,218 44.26% 7,831 55.74% 14,049 3.14% WESTERN NALOLO 9,182 39.18% 14,254 60.82% 23,436 5.24% WESTERN NKEYEMA 11,739 43.69% 15,128 56.31% 26,867 6.01% WESTERN SENANGA 13,326 39.53% 20,384 60.47% 33,710 7.54% WESTERN SESHEKE 11,280 44.24% 14,219 55.76% 25,499 5.70% WESTERN SHANGOMBO 9,329 35.10% 17,249 64.90% 26,578 5.94% WESTERN SIKONGO 7,133 37.60% 11,840 62.40% 18,973 4.24% WESTERN SIOMA 7,961 40.21% 11,839 59.79% 19,800 4.43% 183,34 8 40.99% 263,945 59.01% 447,293 100.00% .
Recommended publications
  • The Iccf Group Brochure Ed

    The Iccf Group Brochure Ed

    THE ICCF GROUP BROCHURE ED. 2021-2022 INTERNATIONALCONSERVATION.ORG TABLE OF CONTENTS WHO WE ARE AND WHAT WE DO ................................................................ 4 WORKING WITH LEGISLATURES ..................................................................... 8 • Caucuses We Support ................................. 10 • ICCF in the United States ................................ 12 • The ICCF Group in the United Kingdom ......................................................................................................... 31 • The ICCF Group in Latin America & the Caribbean ...................................................................................... 39 • The ICCF Group in Africa ............................ 63 • The ICCF Group in Southeast Asia ................ 93 WORKING WITH MINISTRIES ....................................................................... 103 MISSION THE MOST ADVANCED WE WORK HOW TO ADVANCE SOLUTION IN CONSERVATION CONSERVATION GOVERNANCE GOVERNANCE BY BUILDING 1. WE BUILD POLITICAL WILL POLITICAL WILL, The ICCF Group advances leadership in conservation by building political will among parliamentary PROVIDING and congressional leaders, and by supporting ministries in the management of protected areas. ON-THE-GROUND SOLUTIONS 2. CATALYZING CHANGE WITH KNOWLEDGE & EXPERTISE We support political will to conserve natural resources by catalyzing strategic partnerships and knowledge sharing between policymakers and our extensive network. VISION 3. TO PRESERVE THE WORLD'S MOST CRITICAL LANDSCAPES
  • Chililabombwe District Investment Profile

    Chililabombwe District Investment Profile

    CHILILABOMBWE DISTRICT INVESTMENT PROFILE WELCOME TO CHILILABOMBWE HOME OF THE CROAKING FROG This profile give you an insight of Chililabombwe District. It demonstrates the investment poetical of the District and the comparative advantages with other Districts in the Province. Chililabombwe is predominantly a mining town. However, the District offers a lot of other economic activities that have high potential for growth. Apart from mining, Chililabombwe has a conducive climate and suitable land for agriculture, fish farming, beekeeping and other agricultural related activities. The District also has potential for Tourism, Small-scale Mining, Infrastructure development, Trade and many others. Therefore, investing in Chililabombwe is one of the wisest business decisions you will make due to the high demand for goods and services in Chililabombwe and Congo DR. Phone: +260977316767 E-mail: [email protected] Facebook: Chililabombwe Municipal Council Sincerely, Christabel M. Mulala Chililabombwe Mayor PO Box 210023 President Avenue Chililabombwe Page | 1 Table of Contents WELCOME TO CHILILABOMBWE ................................................................................................... 1 LIST OF TABLES .................................................................................................................................. 4 LIST OF FIGURES ................................................................................................................................ 4 ABBREVIATIONS ...............................................................................................................................
  • Environmental Project Brief

    Environmental Project Brief

    Public Disclosure Authorized IMPROVED RURAL CONNECTIVITY Public Disclosure Authorized PROJECT (IRCP) REHABILITATION OF PRIMARY FEEDER ROADS IN EASTERN PROVINCE Public Disclosure Authorized ENVIRONMENTAL PROJECT BRIEF September 2020 SUBMITTED BY EASTCONSULT/DASAN CONSULT - JV Public Disclosure Authorized Improved Rural Connectivity Project Environmental Project Brief for the Rehabilitation of Primary Feeder Roads in Eastern Province Improved Rural Connectivity Project (IRCP) Rehabilitation of Primary Feeder Roads in Eastern Province EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Government of the Republic Zambia (GRZ) is seeking to increase efficiency and effectiveness of the management and maintenance of the of the Primary Feeder Roads (PFR) network. This is further motivated by the recognition that the road network constitutes the single largest asset owned by the Government, and a less than optimal system of the management and maintenance of that asset generally results in huge losses for the national economy. In order to ensure management and maintenance of the PFR, the government is introducing the OPRC concept. The OPRC is a concept is a contracting approach in which the service provider is paid not for ‘inputs’ but rather for the results of the work executed under the contract i.e. the service provider’s performance under the contract. The initial phase of the project, supported by the World Bank will be implementing the Improved Rural Connectivity Project (IRCP) in some selected districts of Central, Eastern, Northern, Luapula, Southern and Muchinga Provinces. The project will be implemented in Eastern Province for a period of five (5) years from 2020 to 2025 using the Output and Performance Road Contract (OPRC) approach. GRZ thus intends to roll out the OPRC on the PFR Network covering a total of 14,333Kms country-wide.
  • Winrock Report Template

    Winrock Report Template

    <name of> Project | Month Year Photo: EMPOWER participants from Chimtende Hub, Katete District (Winrock International) EMPOWER Case Study UNDERSTANDING VARIATION IN REAL COURSE ATTENDANCE AND ACHIEVEMENT Date: October 30, 2020 Author: Alex Hardin, Winrock International EMPOWER Case Study UNDERSTANDING VARIATION IN REAL COURSE ATTENDANCE AND ACHIEVEMENT Date: October 30, 2020 PROJECT NAME: EMPOWER: Increasing Economic and Social Empowerment for Adolescent Girls and Vulnerable Women in Zambia COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT NUMBER: IL-29964-16-75-K- AUTHOR: Alex Hardin, Winrock International FUNDER: United States Department of Labor Funding is provided by the United States Department of Labor under cooperative agreement number IL-29964-16-75-K-. One hundred percent of the total costs of the project are financed with federal funds, for a total of $5,000,000. This material does not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the United States Department of Labor, nor does mention of trade names, commercial products, or organizations imply endorsement by the United States Government. CONTACT: 2101 Riverfront Drive 2451 Crystal Drive, Suite 700 Little Rock, AR 72202 Arlington, VA 22202 501-280-3000 701-302-6500 winrock.org Acknowledgements The case study researcher would like to thank everyone who offered their time and energy toward the development of this report. Special thanks go to the Chasefu and Petauke District Coordinators, Dennis and Sombo, without whom the vast majority of the research would have been impossible, and to Diana, Mutale, Doug,
  • Provincial Health Literacy Training Report Northern and Muchinga Provinces

    Provincial Health Literacy Training Report Northern and Muchinga Provinces

    Provincial Health Literacy Training Report Northern and Muchinga Provinces AT MANGO GROVE LODGE, MPIKA, ZAMBIA 23-26TH APRIL 2013 Ministry of Health and Lusaka District Health Team, Zambia in association with Training and Research Support Centre (TARSC) Zimbabwe In the Regional Network for Equity in Health in east and southern Africa (EQUINET) With support from CORDAID 1 Table of Contents 1. Background ......................................................................................................................... 3 2. Opening .............................................................................................................................. 4 3. Ministry of Health and LDHMT ............................................................................................ 5 3.1 Background information on MOH ................................................................................. 5 3.2 Background on LDHMT ............................................................................................... 6 4. Using participatory approaches in health ............................................................................ 7 5. The health literacy programme ............................................................................................ 9 5.1 Overview of the Health literacy program ...................................................................... 9 5.2 Using the Zambia HL Manual ......................................................................................10 5.3 Social mapping ...........................................................................................................10
  • USAID/Zambia Partners in Development Book

    USAID/Zambia Partners in Development Book

    PARTNERS IN DEVELOPMENT July 2018 Partners in Zambia’s Development Handbook July 2018 United States Agency for International Development Embassy of the United States of America Subdivision 694 / Stand 100 Ibex Hill Road P.O. Box 320373 Lusaka, Zambia 10101 Cover Photo: As part of a private -sector and youth-engagement outreach partnership, media entrepreneur and UNAIDS Ambassador Lulu Haangala Wood (l), musician and entrepreneur Pompi (c), and Film and TV producer Yoweli Chungu (r) lend their voices to help draw attention to USAID development programs. (Photo Credit: Chando Mapoma / USAID Zambia) Our Mission On behalf of the American People, we promote and demonstrate democratic values abroad, and advance a free, peaceful, and prosperous world. In support of America's foreign policy, the U.S. Agency for International Development leads the U.S. Government's international development and disaster assistance through partnerships and investments that save lives, reduce poverty, strengthen democratic governance, and help people emerge from humanitarian crises and progress beyond assistance. Our Interagency Initiatives USAID/Zambia Partners In Development 1 The United States Agency for International Development (USAID) is the lead U.S. Government agency that works to end extreme global poverty and enable resilient, democratic societies to realize their potential. Currently active in over 100 countries worldwide, USAID was born out of a spirit of progress and innovation, reflecting American values and character, motivated by a fundamental belief in helping others. USAID provides development and humanitarian assistance in Africa, Asia and the Near East, Latin America and the Caribbean, and Europe. Headquartered in Washington, D.C., USAID retains field missions around the world.
  • Full Text Document (Pdf)

    Full Text Document (Pdf)

    Kent Academic Repository Full text document (pdf) Citation for published version Macola, Giacomo (2006) “It Means as If We Are Excluded from the Good Freedom”: Thwarted Expectations of Independence in the Luapula Province of Zambia, 1964-1967. Journal of African History, 47 (1). pp. 43-56. ISSN 0021-8537. DOI https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021853705000848 Link to record in KAR https://kar.kent.ac.uk/7559/ Document Version UNSPECIFIED Copyright & reuse Content in the Kent Academic Repository is made available for research purposes. Unless otherwise stated all content is protected by copyright and in the absence of an open licence (eg Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher, author or other copyright holder. Versions of research The version in the Kent Academic Repository may differ from the final published version. Users are advised to check http://kar.kent.ac.uk for the status of the paper. Users should always cite the published version of record. Enquiries For any further enquiries regarding the licence status of this document, please contact: [email protected] If you believe this document infringes copyright then please contact the KAR admin team with the take-down information provided at http://kar.kent.ac.uk/contact.html ‘IT MEANS AS IF WE ARE EXCLUDED FROM THE GOOD FREEDOM’: THWARTED EXPECTATIONS OF INDEPENDENCE IN THE LUAPULA PROVINCE OF ZAMBIA, 1964-1966* BY GIACOMO MACOLA Centre of African Studies, University of Cambridge ABSTRACT: Based on a close reading of new archival material, this article makes a case for the adoption of an empirical, ‘sub-systemic’ approach to the study of nationalist and post- colonial politics in Zambia.
  • (IBM) – Border Operations Assessment Kasumbalesa

    (IBM) – Border Operations Assessment Kasumbalesa

    Technical Report: Work Plan Activity: 1.2.2 I Integrated Border Management (IBM) – Border Operations Assessment Kasumbalesa Magdeline Mabua, Transit Specialist Agnes Katsonga-Phiri, Customs Consultant Lawrence Kubanga, Monitoring & Evaluation Specialist Nomasomi Mpofu, Gender Integration Specialist Submitted by: AECOM International Development Submitted to: USAID/Southern Africa October 2011 USAID Contract No. 674-C-00-10-00075-00 DISCLAIMER The author’s views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development or the United States Government. PO Box 602090 ● Plot 50668, Tholo Park, Fairgrounds ● Gaborone, Botswana ● Phone (267) 390 0884 ● Fax (267) 390 1027 ● [email protected] www.satradehub.org TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ..................................................................................................... 2 LIST OF ACRONYMS ........................................................................................................ 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................... 4 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................... 5 2. BACKGROUND ..................................................................................................... 5 1.0 OBJECTIVES ........................................................................................................... 6 4.0 SCOPE OF WORK ......................................................................................................
  • 1 Elections and Peacebuilding in Zambia Assessment Final Report

    1 Elections and Peacebuilding in Zambia Assessment Final Report

    Elections and Peacebuilding in Zambia Assessment Final Report Contents Executive Summary ............................................................................................................ 3 Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 8 I. Structural Vulnerabilities ................................................................................................. 9 A. Political Factors.............................................................................................................. 9 B. Social Factors ............................................................................................................... 11 Table 1 .............................................................................................................................. 14 Composition of Members of Parliament by Gender since 1994 ....................................... 14 C. Economic Factors ......................................................................................................... 14 D. Security Factors............................................................................................................ 14 II. Vulnerabilities Specific to the 2011 Election ............................................................... 15 A. Electoral Administration .............................................................................................. 15 B. Parallel Vote Tabulation (PVT) ..................................................................................
  • Country Profile: Zambia

    Country Profile: Zambia

    TECHNICAL MARKET REVIEW Country Profile: Zambia CTCN Report No.: REPORT NO, Rev. Draft Date: 2018-06-06 1 IMPORTANT NOTICE AND DISCLAIMER 1. This document is intended for the sole use of the Customer as detailed on the front page of this document to whom the document is addressed and who has entered into a written agreement with the DNV GL entity issuing this document (“DNV GL”). To the extent permitted by law, neither DNV GL nor any group company (the "Group") assumes any responsibility whether in contract, tort including without limitation negligence, or otherwise howsoever, to third parties (being persons other than the Customer), and no company in the Group other than DNV GL shall be liable for any loss or damage whatsoever suffered by virtue of any act, omission or default (whether arising by negligence or otherwise) by DNV GL, the Group or any of its or their servants, subcontractors or agents. This document must be read in its entirety and is subject to any assumptions and qualifications expressed therein as well as in any other relevant communications in connection with it. This document may contain detailed technical data which is intended for use only by persons possessing requisite expertise in its subject matter. 2. This document is protected by copyright and may only be reproduced and circulated in accordance with the Document Classification and associated conditions stipulated or referred to in this document and/or in DNV GL’s written agreement with the Customer. No part of this document may be disclosed in any public offering memorandum, prospectus or stock exchange listing, circular or announcement without the express and prior written consent of DNV GL.
  • Immediate Media Statement Regarding KCM

    Immediate Media Statement Regarding KCM

    Immediate media statement regarding KCM Vedanta Resources and Konkola Copper Mines (KCM) are aware of media reports that Zambian state owned company, ZCCM-IH, has obtained an ex-parte order against KCM. ZCCM-IH owns 20.6% of KCM and has its nominees on the company’s board. Vedanta and KCM reiterate their request for an immediate and urgent meeting with his Excellency, Edgar Lungu, President of the Republic of Zambia, to discuss the matter. Vedanta is a long-standing, loyal investor in KCM and in Zambia having invested over US$3 billion since the acquisition of the asset in 2004. The company employs nearly 13,000 people at its sites and operates clinics, hospitals and schools through its corporate social responsibility programme that amounts to over US$210 million since the acquisition. KCM has contributed c.US$1.3 billion to the Zambian Exchequer in that period and continues to be the leading Pay As You Earn contributor in the country. For the year ended 31 March 2019, Vedanta provided KCM with financial support (including funding of loan repayments) of US$419 million. These significant financial and social investments combined with exponential rises in taxes, duties, fuel and power costs have placed an enormous and unaffordable burden on the company. The most recent restrictions and duty on concentrates have negatively impacted the running of the smelter and the much-needed acid to run its operations. In addition, the Zambian government owes the company more than US$180 million in VAT refunds which has made the situation even more challenging.
  • Corporate Affairs and Business Development

    Corporate Affairs and Business Development

    CORPORATE AFFAIRS AND BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT THE PROPOSED CONNECTION OF NORTH WESTERN PROVINCE TO THE NATIONAL GRID AT 132kV PREPARED BY THE ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL AFFAIRS UNIT 2011 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY In the Northwestern Province (NWP) ZESCO Limited supplies electricity to five districts namely Mwinilunga, Mufumbwe, Kabompo, Zambezi and Chavuma from isolated Diesel Generation Stations located in each district. The older districts (Mwinilunga, Kabompo, and Zambezi) have been on diesel power supply for over forty years now. Solwezi and Kasempa are the only two districts in the province that are supplied from the national hydro power grid. Power supply from the diesel power stations is characterized by high operational costs, inadequate capacity, very low reliability and high emissions. ZESCO Limited has therefore long sought to replace diesel generated power supply with reliable and cost effective power from the national grid by connecting all the diesel power stations to the grid. By the year 2000, ZESCO Limited was operating ten diesel stations country wide, but by 2007, four such stations had been replaced by grid supply while two new stations were installed in two newly designated districts. Despite having great potential for mining and agricultural development, NWP generally remains underdeveloped due to insufficient and unreliable power supply. It is against this background that the Government of the Republic of Zambia through ZESCO Limited, intends to connect the 5 NWP Districts still on diesel, to the National Grid at 132 kilo Volts (kV) through a transmission line network from Kasempa T-Off (Nselauke) to Chavuma and linking Mwinilunga to Lumwana. The main objective of the project is to replace the diesel generated electricity with hydro electricity by constructing a 132kV transmission line network which would be linked to the main national power grid.