DOCSLIB.ORG

Plate Isopach and Structure Contour Maps4 Lower Trinity (Hosston and Sligo)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Plate Isopach and Structure Contour Maps4 Lower Trinity (Hosston and Sligo) 49 Introduction to the Geology and Hydrogeology of the Hill Country Trinity Group Briarcliff ISOPACH and STRUCTURE MAPS LLANO UPLIFT Lakeway Alex S. Broun, P.G. 42 “Geologic knowledge of aquifers…... (is) mandatory for intelligent groundwater resource Wimberley. Here it is down-dropped to the southeast through a series of normal faults related to 202 K N utilization.” F.G. Driscoll, 1986. Early Miocene tectonic movement (Ewing, 1991). During late Lower Glen Rose time, a low-lying A B swamp with ferns covered the shoreline and dinosaurs and crocodiles waded in the shallow, R 100 E E During the past 120 years, considerable work has been done on the geology and hydrogeology of muddy waters (Figure 3-4 and Plate 17, Photo 15). V L A O the Texas Hill Country Trinity. From the pioneer work of R. T. Hill (circa 1890’s) to current university H & S 183 graduate studies, the rocks of the Trinity Group have been hammered, sampled, sliced, photo- Schematic Geologic Cross Section: The schematic cross section, Figure 4-4, is drawn roughly M & A graphed and studied. Critical analyses by many outstanding geoscientists have established a clear northwest to southeast, from the Llano Uplift to the Edwards recharge zone. The Paleozoic units E E 0 N 97 R 4 Plate structural and lithostratigraphic framework for the area (see references). Building on that work, we that subcrop beneath the Lower Cretaceous sedimentary wedge are diagrammatically shown after O T Johnson 0 0 T S S D 300 hope that through the addition of acquired subsurface data and hydrological analyses that this Flawn (1961). The overall transgressive Trinity Group sedimentary rocks are shown onlapping and City T L E 153 337 I 200 ID Atlas can provide a practical tool that today’s earth scientists and policy makers can use to better covering the Paleozoic foreland facies of the Llano Uplift. The overall thickness of the Trinity Group S A N t R 195 210 R u B 245 B o understand and manage Trinity Group Aquifers. is about 1000 feet and consists of three clastic-carbonate cycles or couplets. The section dips - h ALLUVIAL FAN D c gently to the southeast until intersected by Early Miocene-age faulting of the Balcones Fault Zone. E in R , p Sycamore Onlap 400 Isopach and Structure Contour Maps Structural History: The structural grain of the Central Texas Hill Country follows the Paleozoic The section suggests that a structural hinge-line exists at the frontal edge of the Ouachita Thrust. E o 186 Austin Lower Trinity ( 15 17 N O ig CHANNEL SANDS 17 T l 148 287 tectonic template defined by the Llano (Massif) Uplift and the Ouachita Orogenic Belt. Late Paleo- In addition, that differential subsidence along this northeast-southwest trending front affected the S S D 115 zoic tectonic plate movement to the northwest resulted in the thrusting of a thick basinal facies, overlying Trinity sedimentary section as evidenced by: Sligo pinch out, Hensel-Lower Glen Rose N BEACH/BAR A Hays Co. Dripping S 259 sedimentary prism against the Llano Uplift. The frontal thrust of the Ouachita facies deformation facies change, northeast trend of Trinity shoreline facies and, may have influenced the location of , Springs MARINE HIGH ENERGY E Blanco Co. 100 T 107 A t Travis Co. belt, which was mapped by Flawn (1961), transects the study area (see Figure 4-3). Llano, Pre- Lower Miocene-age faulting. 77102 R n E o Hays Co. r 300 110 cambrian and Cambrian igneous and metamorphic rocks and surrounding Paleozoic foreland M f LO 250 n G io facies were uplifted at the end of the Paleozoic. The San Marcos Arch appears as the plunging t 305 N a CO nose of the uplift. E rm L DELTA PLAIN fo 4-4 Schematic Geologic Cross Section BB e E d P a With the opening of the Gulf of Mexico, the peneplained Paleozoic surface tilted to the southeast it 300 400 BLANCO CO. HAYS CO. ch NW SE a and was flooded by early Cretaceous onlapping sediments. Basinward, towards the Gulf, the Blanco u O Ked f Kgru o 400 Lower Cretaceous rests on Jurassic salt. In the Hill Country the Cretaceous rests unconformably Facies p Kgrl Onlap transition o Khe cr Hosston and Sligo) over the Paleozoic. Aptian age structural movement is evidenced on Cross Section C-C’ in Blanco Khe-Kgrl 155 b 200 u S Co. The Hensel Sand facies of the Trinity Group rests unconformably over the Cow Creek forma- Buda Upper Glen 176 tion. Late Cretaceous tectonic movement, possibly Laramide, folded the Cretaceous section, as Rose (Kgru) Jacob’s Edwards 294 shown on the structure maps. The Llano Uplift was positive during parts of the Lower Cretaceous Hensel (Khe) Well Lower Glen Rose (Kgrl) Edwards 280 (Ked) WITH DOLOMITE Woodcreek until covered by Hensel and Glen Rose sediments. During Early Miocene time a number of factors locally confining unit Kgru Cow Creek (Kcc) THICK DELTAIC SANDSTONE, combined to drop the section to the southeast. The Balcones Fault Zone (BFZ) was formed during Hammett (Kha) SILTSTONE,PRO SHALE DELTA Kyle regional confining unit Kgru RED-BROWN SILTSTONE & SHALE & THIN SANDSTONE this time, resulting in a series of en-echelon normal faults, down-to-the southeast. Fracturing asso- Sligo (Ksl) Kgrl Geologic Explanation ciated with structural stress during each of these events shattered the brittle carbonate section, Khe 140 Hosston (Kho) Kgrl 186 Kcc providing pathways for solution conduits and groundwater movement. Kha Precambrian Igneous Ksl Kcc 4-1 Lower Trinity and Foreland Facies Lower Paleozoic Ksl Metamorphic Lower Paleozoic Upper Paleozoic Ouachita Facies Kho Ksl Isopach rocks weakly Metamorphosed sediments Wimberley Kho (Hosston and Sligo) Sligo Formation (subsurface formation; does not crop out) LLANO UPLIFT Paleozoic Llano OUACHITA TECTONIC FRONT BALCONES FAULT SYSTEM Structural dome Fault Zone Structural Hinge Line Miocene-age (Balcones) normal faults Limestone and dolomite with basal siltstone and shale. 4-3 Tectonic and Depositional Maps block and transmit groundwater flow Figure modified from Broun and Wierman (2009); Stricklin and Amsbury (1974); Flawn (1961). 200 Thickness in feet Dolomite contains relict coarse skeletal fragments and rudists. 280 Selected Tectonic Elements of Central Lower Cretaceous Well penetrates Paleozoic (n=15), thickness expressed in feet Texas modified from Ewing (1991) Depositional Setting, Central Texas Hays Co. Comal Co. Ksy 140 Well with partial penetration of Lower Trinity (n=20), partial thickness expressed in feet San Cross Sections: Five pairs of cross sections were constructed to describe the report area and to Marcos Sycamore (Hosston) Formation present another dimension to the mapping program. Stratigraphic and Structural cross sections Note: Lower Trinity Isopach Map includes the Sligo, Hosston, and were drawn along each line. There are three dip sections and two strike sections (Plates 7-11). Sycamore Formations Basal conglomerate and fluvial sands, shoreline sands and siltstones with Only the environment of deposition and lithofacies Hosston/Sycamore are indicated. silty shale overbank deposits. Commonly red-brown. Hosston Fm (Kho) is ault Ouachita Front Stratigraphic Cross Sections: The primary sources of data for the stratigraphic cross-sections subsurface equivalent with stacked channel sands and one Z Llano F Carbonate are geophysical logs (wireline logs) from 150 area water wells. The log suites normally include Llano Islands Shelf high-energy “beach” deposits to east. natural gamma, SP, and single point resistivity curves. If the drill hole was not cased the suite of Llano Uplift AUSTIN d AUSTIN N n e San Marcos tr logs might also include a resistivity log, and when required, a caliper. A sonic log was run by the f Arch e Pz e USGS at the Sabino Ranch well. The natural gamma curve is present on all well logs and was used San Marcos R 924 ity Balcones o Platform Briarcliff t C ine to pick formation tops and to correlate between wells. Cuttings samples were described from 45 xic r Fault Zone e a ar tu M o Paleozoic, undifferentiated S al Gulf wells with a binocular microscope. Completion logs were constructed for each well that had both xic e 0 110 220 mi estr Open Gulf of M nc geophysical logs and described cuttings. Lithologic strip logs were constructed from wells with only A of M LLANO UPLIFT Lakeway samples. Where possible the cross sections also include outcrop data, measured sections and described core. Where no samples were available, the gamma curve was used to interpret lithol- PC Prominent structural features include: Prominent depositional features include: 700 ogy. The sections are datumed at the top of the Cow Creek formation. Colors and patterns are 820 725 Lower Miocene-age Balcones Fault Zone (en-echelon Llano Islands: Clastic sediment provenance. used to describe lithology. The sections were correlated at full log scale (1 inch = 20 feet), drafted Precambrian, undifferentiated normal faulting). at half scale and redrafted at a reduced scale for publication. San Marcos Platform: stable, low-relief shelf. Llano Uplift and subsurface San Marcos Arch 840 Depositional environment: wide, shallow water, Structural Cross Sections: The topography for the cross sections was drawn from USGS topo- Paleozoic-age Ouachita Structural Belt (compression carbonate-shelf facies w/shoreline, tidal and graphic map sheets. Geophysical well logs were used to correlate subsurface Trinity rock forma- 793 692 650 400 and wrench faulting) deltaic environments; inner shelf rudistid tions. Faulting was taken from mapped surface faults (Geological Map Plate 1). The faults are N mound buildups. 785 300 200 drawn to show Paleozoic displacement but there is no specific data to support this model. Paleo- 665 Johnson zoic involvement however, seems reasonable given the geologic history of the basin.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • GSA Poster 2013 Long
    Hydrological and Geochemical Characteristics in the Edwards and Trinity Hydrostratigraphic Units Using Multiport Monitor Wells in the Balcones Fault Zone, Hays County, Central Texas Alan Andrews, Brian Hunt, Brian Smith Purpose Rising-falling K Slug-in K Slug-out K Zone Zone (ft/day) (ft/day) (ft/day) Thickness (ft) Trans ft2/day Stratigraphy 21 0.3 -- -- 35 10 Stratigraphy General Hydrologic ID To better understand the hydrogeological properties of and 20 53 -- -- 70 3700 Eagle Ford/ Hydrostratigraphy Function thickness in feet Lithology Porosity/Permeability Sources Rising-falling K Slug K Zone Transmissivity Qal? confining Zone (ft/day) (ft/day) Thickness (ft) (ft2/day) 19 5 8 6 30 140 40-50 Dense limestone Buda unit (CU) Low 18 3 3 -- 25 84 relationships between the geologic units that make up the Confining Units 14 -- -- 136 -- CU Blue-green to 17 38 -- 44 105 4000 Upper Del Rio 50-60 Upper Confining Unit 13 65 -- 72 13000 137.9’ Fract oyster wakestone yellow-brown clay 16 29 80 19 70 2000 12 2 -- 34 460 145.7’ stylolites and fract I Edwards, Upper and Middle Trinity Aquifers and to compare Georgetown Fm. CU Marly limestone; grnst Low 15 29 105 161 75 2100 40-60 11 4 -- 159 8300 Crystalline limestone; mdst to wkst 14 8 10 3 45 370 Leached and 199.6’ fossil (toucasid) vug Aquifer (AQ) III to milliolid grnst; chert; collapse High 10 0.09 -- 197 50 13 4 2 6 40 160 observed hydrologic properties of formations to generally accept- Collapsed mbrs 230’ solutioned bedding plane 30-80 breccia 9 0.005 -- 97 4 12 0.2 -- -- 85 -- 200 feet Reg.
    [Show full text]
  • Carbonate Factory Response and Recovery After Ocean Anoxic Event 1A, Pearsall Formation, Central Texas
    Copyright by Esben Skjold Pedersen 2020 The Thesis Committee for Esben Skjold Pedersen Certifies that this is the approved version of the following Thesis: Carbonate Factory Response and Recovery after Ocean Anoxic Event 1a, Pearsall Formation, Central Texas APPROVED BY SUPERVISING COMMITTEE: Charles Kerans, Supervisor Toti E. Larson, Co-Supervisor Daniel O. Breecker Carbonate Factory Response and Recovery after Ocean Anoxic Event 1a, Pearsall Formation, Central Texas by Esben Skjold Pedersen Thesis Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas at Austin in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Geological Sciences The University of Texas at Austin August 2020 Dedication To my parents for their endless support. To my sister, aunt, and uncle for opening my eyes to the world of the geological sciences. Acknowledgements Firstly, I would like to thank my co-supervisors, Charlie Kerans and Toti Larson, for the opportunity to continue my education as a graduate student at the University of Texas at Austin, and their wisdom both within and outside of the realm of geoscience. I would also like to thank Dan Breecker for serving on my committee, and for his advice during my time at UT. I am grateful to Equinor for investing in my research and education in the geological sciences while as a graduate student. I would like to thank Rob Forkner in particular, for his guidance and direction. I would like to thank the Staff at the Bureau of Economic Geology, including Nathan Ivicic, Brandon Williamson, and Rudy Lucero for their help and problem solving in the core warehouse, especially during COVID-19 restrictions, and to Evan Sivil for his help with pXRF dataset acquisition and guidance.
    [Show full text]
  • GEOLOGIC QUADRANGLE MAP NO. 49 Geology of the Pedernales Falls Quadrangle, Blanco County, Texas
    BUREAU OF ECONOMIC GEOLOGY THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN AUSTIN, TEXAS 78712 W. L. FISHER, Director GEOLOGIC QUADRANGLE MAP NO. 49 Geology of the Pedernales Falls Quadrangle, Blanco County, Texas By VIRGIL E. BARNES November 1982 THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN TO ACCOMPANY MAP-GEOLOGIC BUREAU OF ECONOMIC GEOLOGY QUADRANGLE MAP NO. 49 GEOLOGY OF THE PEDERNALES FALLS QUADRANGLE, BLANCO COUNTY, TEXAS Virgil E. Barnes 1982 CONTENTS General setting .. .. .. ............... 2 Cretaceous System (Lower Cretaceous) . 10 Geologic formations ......... .. ... 2 Trinity Group . 10 Paleozoic rocks ........... .. .. 2 Travis Peak Formation . 10 Cambrian System (Upper Cambrian) . 2 Sycamore Sand . 10 Moore Hollow Group ....... 2 Hammett Shale and Cow Creek Wilberns Formation . ........ 2 Limestone . 10 San Saba Member . .. .... 2 Shingle Hills Formation . 10 Ordovician System (Lower Ordovician) .. 3 Hensen Sand Member . 10 Ellenburger Group . ... .. .... 3 Glen Rose Limestone Member . 10 Tanyard Formation .. ... .... 3 Cenozoic rocks . 11 Threadgill Member ..... ... 3 Quaternary System . 11 Staendebach Member ....... 3 Pleistocene Series . 11 Gorman Formation ...... 4 Terrace deposits . 11 Honeycut Formation ......... 5 Recent Series . 11 Devonian system . .. .... .... 7 Alluvium . 11 Stribling Formation .... .. .. 7 Subsurface geology . 11 Devonian-Mississippian rocks . ...... 8 Mineral resources . 12 Joint fillings ...... ... ... 8 Construction materials . 12 Houy Formation ....... .. .. 8 Building stone . 12 Mississippian System ......... ...
    [Show full text]
  • Plate Stratigraphic & Structure Cross Sections11 E
    West East EXPLANATION M E E’ M Line intersection w/ B-B’ S M Upper Pan Glen Rose M 11-1 STRATIGRAPHIC CROSS SECTION E-E’ Geophysical Log & Samples (Kgru) S M Blanco River Dip Cross Section # # # Alex S. Broun, P.G., Douglas A. Wierman, P.G. # # and Wesley Schumacher M S F Wyn M Line intersection Geophysical Log Lower w/ C-C’ BLANCO CO. HAYS CO. Glen Rose M (Kgrl) S M M S G F Hensel (Khe) BLANCO RIVER Ap SB PR2 Upper Glen Rose: M Upper Trinity G G Upper Trinity Cow Creek ft LasM3 Upper Glen Rose (Kcc) 400 Limited Aquifer Geophysical Log & Samples Hammett Wall1 BLANCO (Kha) Ap SB PR1 Cie Sey Stl Nar Nel Arr Samples S G RIVER S M Geophysical Log Geophysical Log Geophysical Log Shell Core Geophysical Log Geophysical Log Sligo (Ksl) BLANCO RIVER 300 Lithology from Lederman Well S M Upper Aptian - Lower Albian Aptian - Lower Upper Stratotype Surface Sec. Offline one mile NW # Upper Glen Rose # Lower-Upper Sycamore/ “CA” Regional Marker Upper Glen Rose Glen Rose (1) Hosston Contact (Ksy/Kho) M 200 S F S KarstKarst Dinosaur tracks Little Blanco S F M measured section S F B. Hunt & S Lower Glen Rose BLANCO RIVER Burnet Ranch #1 S. Musick Shell core S Explanation M S Limestone (micr) Figure modified from Stricklin & S S F Lozo, 1971 and R.W. Scott, 2007 100 Limestone (skel) Lower Glen Rose Stratigraphic notes: Lower Glen Rose S Lower Glen Rose: Middle Trinity Aquifer LOWER CRETACEOUS Limestone (reef) 1- Edwards Group, Kainer Fm, as defined by Rose (1972).
    [Show full text]
  • Groundwater Flow Systems in Multiple Karst Aquifers of Central Texas
    GROUNDWATER FLOW SYSTEMS IN MULTIPLE KARST AQUIFERS OF CENTRAL TEXAS Brian A. Smith Barton Springs/Edwards Aquifer Conservation District, 1124 Regal Row, Austin, Texas, 78748, USA, [email protected] Brian B. Hunt Barton Springs/Edwards Aquifer Conservation District, 1124 Regal Row, Austin, Texas, 78748, USA, [email protected] Douglas A. Wierman Blue Creek Consulting, LLC, 400 Blue Creek Drive, Dripping Springs, Texas, 78620, USA, [email protected] Marcus O. Gary Edwards Aquifer Authority, 1615 N. St. Mary’s Street, San Antonio, Texas, 78215, USA, [email protected] Abstract hydrogeologic and resource evaluations and modeling of Increased demand for groundwater in central Hays the Middle Trinity Aquifer. County is prompting studies to evaluate the availability of groundwater in the Trinity Aquifers of central Texas. Introduction These aquifers, consisting mostly of limestone, dolomite, With limited surface water, central Texas is fortunate to and marl, exhibit varying degrees of karstification. Near have the Edwards and Middle Trinity karst aquifer systems the surface, karst features such as caves and sinkholes are that provide a variety of groundwater resources. The karstic evident, but are widely scattered. Even at depths greater Edwards Aquifer has been recognized for decades as a vital than 400 m (1,300 ft), units that are mostly limestone show groundwater resource, and thus many studies have been some degree of karstification where dissolution along published from Hill and Vaugh (1898) to recent (Hauwert fractures has caused development of conduits. Studies are and Sharp, 2014) that characterize the nature of the aquifer being conducted to better understand the horizontal and and its groundwater flow system.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Geological Survey Karst Interest Group Proceedings, San Antonio, Texas, May 16–18, 2017
    A Product of the Water Availability and Use Science Program Prepared in cooperation with the Department of Geological Sciences at the University of Texas at San Antonio and hosted by the Student Geological Society and student chapters of the Association of Petroleum Geologists and the Association of Engineering Geologists U.S. Geological Survey Karst Interest Group Proceedings, San Antonio, Texas, May 16–18, 2017 Edited By Eve L. Kuniansky and Lawrence E. Spangler Scientific Investigations Report 2017–5023 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior RYAN ZINKE, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey William Werkheiser, Acting Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2017 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment—visit https://www.usgs.gov/ or call 1–888–ASK–USGS (1–888–275–8747). For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit https://store.usgs.gov. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this information product, for the most part, is in the public domain, it also may contain copyrighted materials as noted in the text. Permission to reproduce copyrighted items must be secured from the copyright owner. Suggested citation: Kuniansky, E.L., and Spangler, L.E., eds., 2017, U.S. Geological Survey Karst Interest Group Proceedings, San Antonio, Texas, May 16–18, 2017: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2017–5023, 245 p., https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20175023.
    [Show full text]
  • Carbonate Sedimentology and Facies Correlation of the Mason Mountain Wildlife Management Area: Mason, TX
    CARBONATE SEDIMENTOLOGY AND FACIES CORRELATION OF THE MASON MOUNTAIN WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT AREA MASON, TX An Undergraduate Research Scholars Thesis by JOHN CAMPBELL CRAIG Submitted to the Undergraduate Research Scholars program Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the designation as an UNDERGRADUATE RESEARCH SCHOLAR Approved by Research Advisor: Dr. Juan Carlos Laya May 2016 Major: Geology TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ABSTRACT .................................................................................................................................. 1 DEDICATION .............................................................................................................................. 3 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .......................................................................................................... 4 NOMENCLATURE ..................................................................................................................... 5 CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................ 6 Geologic setting of study ...................................................................................... 7 Carbonate formation ........................................................................................... 10 Carbonate classification ...................................................................................... 11 II METHODS ........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Supporting Information
    Supporting Information Darrah et al. 10.1073/pnas.1322107111 SI Text mational brines away from the hinterland and into the foreland Geological Background. Northeastern Pennsylvania (Marcellus). The (i.e., Appalachian Plateau) (18, 19). Appalachian Basin is an archetypal energy-producing foreland Rifting of the Atlantic Ocean that began in the Mesozoic (e.g., basin (Fig. S1) located in the northeastern United States. In the Triassic basalts of Connecticut and New Jersey), accompanied by eastern part (northeastern Pennsylvania and southern New York) recent cycles of glacial advance and retreat, led to rapid exhu- of the northern Appalachian Basin (NAB), oil and gas production mation/unloading, erosion, and neotectonic jointing (i.e., often occurs within various lithologies throughout the northern termed J3) in at least the top 0.5 km of the crust (20). The major Appalachian Plateau region, but is largely confined to two genetic Triassic rift basins in the Appalachian Basin occur in the Gettys- – groups: (i) migrated gases sourced from Ordovician (∼485–443 burg Newark lowland and offshore. Because these rift basins are Ma) shales and hosted in Ordovician/Silurian (∼443–419 Ma) on the opposite side of the Appalachian Structural Front, it is tight sands and carbonates of the Trenton/Black River and (ii) highly unlikely that these Triassic rifts made significant mantle Middle Devonian (∼384–377 Ma) source/reservoir tight gas contributions to the gas chemistry of the plateau region, specifi- > black shales of the Marcellus Group (1). More complete de- cally in our study area (i.e., 150 km away from rift basins). Note that all of our samples have purely crustal helium isotope ra- scriptions of relevant Appalachian geology and hydrocarbon po- 3 4 20 22 – tios ( He/ He) and atmospheric neon isotope ratios ( Ne/ Ne tential in this area are available elsewhere (1 4).
    [Show full text]
  • Guidebook to the Geology of Travis County.Pdf (4.815Mb)
    Page | 1 Guidebook to the Geology of Travis County: Preface Geology of the Austin Area, Travis County, Texas Keith Young When Robert T. Hill first came to Austin, Texas, as the first professor of geology, he described Austin and its surrounding area as an ideal site for a school of geology because it offered such varied outcrops representing rocks of many ages and varieties. Although Hill resigned his position about 85 years ago, the opportunities of the local geology have not changed. Hill (Hill, 1889) implies the intent of writing a series of papers to describe the geology of the local area for all who might be interested. The authors of this volume hope that they have fulfilled in large measure Hill's original intent. No product can ever be all things to all users, but we have presented here common geological phenomenon for many, including the description of an ancient volcano, the description of faulting that occurred in the Austin area in the past, a geologic history of the Austin area, a description of the local rocks, including their classification, field trips for interested observers of the geologic scene, collecting localities for the lovers of fossils, and resource places and agencies. We cannot emphasize enough that many unique geological phenomena are on private property. Please do not trespass, obtain permission. And if permission is not granted, observe from a distance. There are sufficient areas of geologic interest in the Austin area to please all without antagonizing landowners and making it even more difficult for the next person. Page | 2 Guidebook to the Geology of Travis County: Author's Note A useful guide to the geology of the Austin area has long been a goal.
    [Show full text]
  • Ground-Water Availability of the Lower Cretaceous Formations in the Hill
    Report 273 GROUND- WA TER AVAILABILITY OF THE LOWER CRETACEOUS FORMATIONS IN THE HILL COUNTRY OF SOUTH- CENTRAL TEXAS TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES January 1983 “‘._ __ __.. TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES REPORT 273 GROUND-WATER AVAILABILITY OF THE LOWER CRETACEOUS FORMATIONS IN THE HILL COUNTRY OF SOUTH-CENTRAL TEXAS John B. Ashworth, Geologist January 1983 TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES Charles E. Nemir, Executive Director TEXAS WATER DEVELOPMENT BOARD Louis A. Beecherl Jr., Chairman George W. McCleskey, Vice Chairman Glen E. Roney Lonnie A. “Bo” Pilgrim W. 0. Bankston Louie Welch TEXAS WATER COMMISSION Lee B. M. Biggart, Chairman Felix McDonald, Commissioner John D. Stover, Commissioner Authorization for use or reproduction of any original material contained in this publication, i.e., not obtained from other sources, is freely granted The Department would appreciate acknowledgement. Published and distributed by the Texas Department of Water Resources Post Office Box 13087 Austin, Texas 78711 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page CONCLUSIONS . INTRODUCTION Purpose and Scope Location and Extent 2 Geography. 2 Topography and Drainage. 2 Population. 2 Economy and Land Use 3 Vegetation . 3 Climate. 3 Previous Investigations . 3 Acknowledgements. 3 Well-Numbering System 7 Definition of Terms . 8 Metric Conversions . 9 GEOLOGY AS RELATED TO THE OCCURRENCE OF GROUND WATER. 9 Depositional History 9 Stratigraphy 9 Structure . 10 STRATIGRAPHY OF THE WATER-BEARING UNITS. 19 Pre-Cretaceous Rocks 19 Trinity Group. 19 Lower Trinity Aquifer 19 iii TABLE OF CONTENTS-Continued Page Middle Trinity Aquifer . 19 Upper Trinity Aquifer 33 Fredericksburg Group 33 Quaternary Alluvium 33 CHEMICAL QUALITY OF GROUND WATER AS RELATED TO USE 33 General Chemical Quality of Ground Water 33 Public Supply.
    [Show full text]
  • IN MEMORY of ROBERT LOUIS FOLK 30 September 1925 – 4 June 2018
    IN MEMORY OF ROBERT LOUIS FOLK 30 September 1925 – 4 June 2018 Robert Folk in a marble quarry in Lipari, Italy. IN MEMORY OF ROBERT LOUIS FOLK Compiled by Murray Felsher, Miles Hayes, Lynton Land, Earle McBride, and Kitty Milliken Produced by Joe Holmes, Research Planning, Inc. Murray Felsher, Ph.D. 1971 FOLKLORE – FIRST CONTACT Having never met him, I knew Robert L. Folk only by reputation. I had left Amherst MA and the University of Massachusetts, where I had undertaken my M.S. work. It was August 1961, and I was married two months earlier. I had spent the summer as a Carnegie College Teaching Intern teaching an Introductory Geology class at CCNY, where I had earned my B.S. As a native New Yorker, I rarely traveled west of the Hudson, and had never been west of the Mississippi. Gathering meager funds and overloading our VW Beetle with all our belongings, we were to be strangers in a strange land, wherein lived strange people who spoke a strangely attractive version of English. I had earlier applied to only two schools for my Ph.D. --- the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and the University of Texas at Austin, and was accepted by both. When I approached H.T.U. Smith --- chairman of the UMass Geology Department, for whom I served as a Graduate Teaching Assistant during my years there --- for his advice on where I should pursue my doctorate, he unhesitatingly said “Texas. Bob Folk is there. Without question, Texas.” But I did have a question or two, and H.T.U.
    [Show full text]
  • Faults Identified Using the Aerial Photo Analysis Were Ground Truthed, Then
    new study area fault map. Schumacher and Saller (2008) measured strike and dip on over 230 structural features in the area. Refernece Appendix 3. A rose diagram of the faults and fractures in the Cypress Creek watershed is included as Figure 23. The measured faults and fractures trend 45–60° (the major strike of the BFZ) or are conjugate features offset by 60°(105–120°). A study was performed by to delineate critical karst regions within Hays County as part of the Hays County Habitat Conservation Plan (www.hayscountyhcp.com). Figure 24 shows all geologic outcrops that may contain caves and karst features and also delineates areas with known caves and karst features. A number of the mapped karst features occur within the Cypress Creek/Jacob‘s Well study area (Figure 24). 8.0 Occurrence and Flow of Groundwater Figure 23. Structure Measurements—Rose Diagram 8.1 Precipitation The amount of annual precipitation has varied greatly since the USGS gauging station was installed in Jacob‘s Well in April 2005. Since then, there have been two drought periods, April 2005–February 2007 and September 2007–June 2008. As measured by NOAA in Wimberley (Table 3), the average monthly rainfall during the two drought events was 2.1‖ and 1.4‖, respectively. The period March 2007 through August 2007 was significantly wetter, with average monthly rain fall exceeding 7.3‖. Over the entire period of record as measured in Austin, TX since 1856, average annual rainfall is 33.57‖, or an average of 2.8‖ per month. 8.2 Hydrostratigraphy of the Cypress Creek Area Within the Cypress Creek area the principal Figure 24.
    [Show full text]