DOCSLIB.ORG

Ground-Water Availability of the Lower Cretaceous Formations in the Hill

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ground-Water Availability of the Lower Cretaceous Formations in the Hill Report 273 GROUND- WA TER AVAILABILITY OF THE LOWER CRETACEOUS FORMATIONS IN THE HILL COUNTRY OF SOUTH- CENTRAL TEXAS TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES January 1983 “‘._ __ __.. TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES REPORT 273 GROUND-WATER AVAILABILITY OF THE LOWER CRETACEOUS FORMATIONS IN THE HILL COUNTRY OF SOUTH-CENTRAL TEXAS John B. Ashworth, Geologist January 1983 TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES Charles E. Nemir, Executive Director TEXAS WATER DEVELOPMENT BOARD Louis A. Beecherl Jr., Chairman George W. McCleskey, Vice Chairman Glen E. Roney Lonnie A. “Bo” Pilgrim W. 0. Bankston Louie Welch TEXAS WATER COMMISSION Lee B. M. Biggart, Chairman Felix McDonald, Commissioner John D. Stover, Commissioner Authorization for use or reproduction of any original material contained in this publication, i.e., not obtained from other sources, is freely granted The Department would appreciate acknowledgement. Published and distributed by the Texas Department of Water Resources Post Office Box 13087 Austin, Texas 78711 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page CONCLUSIONS . INTRODUCTION Purpose and Scope Location and Extent 2 Geography. 2 Topography and Drainage. 2 Population. 2 Economy and Land Use 3 Vegetation . 3 Climate. 3 Previous Investigations . 3 Acknowledgements. 3 Well-Numbering System 7 Definition of Terms . 8 Metric Conversions . 9 GEOLOGY AS RELATED TO THE OCCURRENCE OF GROUND WATER. 9 Depositional History 9 Stratigraphy 9 Structure . 10 STRATIGRAPHY OF THE WATER-BEARING UNITS. 19 Pre-Cretaceous Rocks 19 Trinity Group. 19 Lower Trinity Aquifer 19 iii TABLE OF CONTENTS-Continued Page Middle Trinity Aquifer . 19 Upper Trinity Aquifer 33 Fredericksburg Group 33 Quaternary Alluvium 33 CHEMICAL QUALITY OF GROUND WATER AS RELATED TO USE 33 General Chemical Quality of Ground Water 33 Public Supply. 39. Primary Standards 42 Secondary Standards 42 Domestic and Livestock 43 Irrigation 44 Industrial 44 Treatment of Water . 44 Chemical Quality of Ground Water from the Trinity Group Aquifer 44 OCCURRENCE OF GROUND WATER IN THE TRINITY GROUP AQUIFER. 47 Recharge, Movement, and Discharge 47 Hydraulic Characteristics 48 Water Levels . 48 Utilization and Development . 60 AVAILABILITY OF GROUND WATER IN THE TRINITY GROUP AQUIFER 60 GROUND-WATER PROBLEMS. 60 RECOMMENDATIONS . 61 SELECTED REFERENCES 63 TABLES 1. Stratigraphic Units and Their Water-Bearing Properties . 12 2. Source and Significance of Dissolved-Mineral Constituents and Properties of Water 40 iv TABLE 0 F CONTENTS-Continued Page 3. Results of Pumping Tests . 55 4. Results of Laboratory Analyses of Cores from Test Wells 56 WELL DATA, BY COUNTIES Page Numbers Records of Selected Chemical Analyses of Water Wells, Springs, Water From Selected and Oil and Gas Tests Well and Springs (Table 5) (Table 6) Well-Location Maps Bandera 66 73 77 Bexar 79 83 85 Blanco 87 95 101 Comal 103 108 109 Gillespie 111 114 117 Hays 119 122 123 Kendall 125 139 147 Kerr 149 157 161 Medina 163 164 165 Real 167 168 169 Uvalde 171 172 173 FIGURES 1. Map Showing Location of Study Region . 2 2. Map Showing Average Annual Precipitation, 1931-60, and Charts of Average Monthly Precipitation for Period of Record at Selected Stations. 5 3. Diagram of Well-Numbering System. 7 4. Map Showing Regional Structural Trends. 11 5. Geologic Map. 13 6. Geologic Section A-A' 15 v TABLE OF CONTENTS-Continued Page 7. Geologic Section B·B' . 17 8. Map Showing Approximate Altitude of and Depth to the Base of the Cretaceous System 21 9. Map Showing Approximate Altitude of and Depth to the Top of the Lower Trinity Aquifer 23 ·10. Map Showing Approximate Total Thickness of the Lower Trinity Aquifer. 25 11. Map Showing Approximate Altitude of and Depth to the Top of the Cow Creek Limestone of the Middle Trinity Aquifer. 29 12. Map Showing Approximate Altitude of and Depth to the Top of the Hensell Sand and Bexar Shale of the Middle Trinity Aquifer . 31 13. Map Showing Approximate Altitude of and Depth to the Top of the Middle Trinity Aquifer. 35 14. Map Showing Approximate Total Thickness of the Middle Trinity Aquifer 37 15. Map Showing Sulfate, Chloride, and Dissolved-Soilds Content in Water from Selected Wells and Springs . _ . 45 16. Hydrographs comparing Water Levels in Low.~r and Middle Trinity Wells and the Gain in Base Flow of the Guadalupe River between the Comfort and Spring Branch Gages . 49 17. Map Showing Approximate Altitude of and Depth to Water Levels in Wells Completed in the Middle Trinity Aquifer, Winter of 1977-78 . 51 18. Map Showing Approximate Altitude of and Depth to Water Levels in Wells Completed in the Lower Trinity Aquifer, 1975-78 . 53 19. Hydrographs of Water Levels in Selected Wells 59 vi GROUND-WATER AVAILABILITY OF THE LOWER CRETACEOUS FORMATIONS IN THE HILL COUNTRY OF SOUTH-CENTRAL TEXAS CONCLUSIONS of sulfate and chloride. High concentrations of iron, nitrate, and fluoride are also common problems. The The Trinity Group aquifer is essentially the dissolved-solids content generally increases downdip only ground-water source for all but the extreme toward the south and southeast. There had been no updip, northern portion of the study region and is widespread pollution of the aquifer in the study region divided, in ascending order, into the lower, middle, although local problems do exist. The chemical quality and upper aquifer units. of the water produced from a well can often be improved by properly casing off zones of undesirable The lower Trinity aquifer, which includes the water. The yield and life expectancy of a well can Hosston Sand and Sligo Limestone Members of the likewise be improved by utilizing proper well completion Travis Peak Formation, yields small to large and development procedures. quantities of ground water. The quality is good in the Kerrville to Bandera area but becomes slightly Although approximately 200,000 acre-feet more saline throughout the remainder of the study (247 hm3) of rainfall is estimated to be available as area. The water is utilized for municipal purposes in recharge to the aquifer annually, much of this recharge is Kerrville and Bandera and for irrigation in a few lost by natural rejection, principally to springs. During other localities. Because of its depth and poor dry periods, recharge is limited and water levels decline. quality, overall development of the lower Trinity Also, continuous heavy pumpage results in rapid aquifer has been minimal. The lower Trinity is not water-level declines due to the aquifer’s rather low present in Gillespie and portions of Blanco and Kerr capability to transmit water. Therefore, moderate to Counties. severe water-level declines can be expected over a major part of the study region where both drought and heavy The middle Trinity aquifer is comprised of the concentrated pumpage occur. Cow Creek Limestone, Hensell Sand, the lower member of the Glen Rose Limestone, and is the most widely utilized of the three aquifer units. The INTRODUCTION middle Trinity aquifer yields small to moderate quantities of fresh to slightly saline water throughout the study region. Purpose and Scope The upper Trinity aquifer produces water from The ground-water study of the Lower Cretaceous the upper member of the Glen Rose Limestone. formations in south-central Texas, commonly referred to Yields are generally very small due to the low as the Hill Country, was conducted during the period porosity and permeability of the limestone, and the from December 1974 to October 1978. The primary chemical quality is normally poor because of the purpose of the study was to describe the hydrologic presence of evaporite beds. This unit is utilized only characteristics of the Trinity Group, which includes the for limited domestic and livestock purposes. Glen Rose Formation and the Hensell Sand, Bexar Shale, Cow Creek Limestone, Hammett Shale, Sligo Limestone, Chemical quality of water in the Trinity Group and Hosston Sand Members of the Travis Peak aquifer is variable. Water acceptable for human Formation. consumption, although very hard, is available over most of the study region. Poor quality of water in Principal objectives of the investigation included: the Trinity is usually due to excessive concentrations (a) collection and evaluation of previously compiled -_ geologic and hydrologic data; (b) determination of the minimum of 780 feet (240 m) in the drainage basins in quantity and quality of the available ground waters on a the east. regional basis; (c) determination of the hydrological characteristics of the various formations; Four major drainage basins occupy the study (d) determination of hydrologic connections between region. Drainage in the Nueces River basin is to the formations; (e) determination of the annual amount of south. In the San Antonio River basin, drainage is to the recharge and discharge of the aquifers; and (f) the southeast. And in the Guadalupe and Colorado River initiation of a continuing ground-water quality basins the drainage is to the east. The larger rivers are monitoring program. dominantly effluent and form wide valleys. The smaller creeks and streams are characterized by two dominant For the purpose of this report, hydrologic: data types: the perennial spring-fed streams, and the were gathered primarily from high-capacity wells which intermittent creeks that only transport precipitation include public supply, industrial, and irrigation wells. runoff. Many of the-streams revert underground when Also an attempt was made to inventory all perennial encountering cavernous zones or areas of gravel springs. accumulation and later resurface as gravity springs. Most of these streams that are perennial in their lower reaches are diverted underground where they cross the Balcones Location and Extent fault zone. Most of this water is probably captured in the down-faulted Edwards Formation. The area of investigation includes the southern edge of the Edwards Plateau and extends southeastward into the Balcones fault zone. It includes all or parts of the following 11 counties: Bandera, Bexar, Blanco, Comal, Gillespie, Hays, Kendall, Kerr, Medina, Real, and Uvalde.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Look at the Texas Hill Country Following the Path We Are on Today Through 2030
    A Look at the Texas Hill Country Following the path we are on today through 2030 This unique and special region will grow, but what will the Hill Country look like in 2030? Growth of the Hill Country The Hill Country Alliance (HCA) is a nonprofit organization whose purpose is to raise public awareness and build community support around the need to preserve the natural resources and heritage of the Central Texas Hill Country. HCA was formed in response to the escalating challenges brought to the Texas Hill Country by rapid development occurring in a sensitive eco-system. Concerned citizens began meeting in September of 2004 to share ideas about strengthening community activism and educating the public about regional planning, conservation development and a more responsible approach growth in the Hill Country. This report was prepared for the Texas Hill Country Alliance by Pegasus Planning 2 Growth of the Hill Country 3 Growth of the Hill Country Table of Contents Executive Summary Introduction The Hill Country Today The Hill Country in 2030 Strategic Considerations Reference Land Development and Provision of Utilities in Texas (a primer) Organizational Resources Materials Reviewed During Project End Notes Methodology The HCA wishes to thank members of its board and review team for assistance with this project, and the authors and contributors to the many documents and studies that were reviewed. September 2008 4 Growth of the Hill Country The Setting The population of the 17-County Hill Country region grew from approximately 800,000 in 1950 (after the last drought on record) to 2.6 million in 2000.
    [Show full text]
  • Glenrose.Pdf
    LÉXICO ESTRATIGRÁFICO DE MÉXICO Glen Rose, Formación...........................................................Cretácico Temprano (Albiano) Referencia(s): Hill, R.T., 1891, The Comanche series of the Texas-Arkansas region: Geological Society of America Bulletin, v. 2, 503-528. Barnes, V.E., 1967, Geologic atlas of Texas, Sherman Sheet; Walter Scott Adkins memorial edition: University of Texas-Austin, Bureau of Economic Geology, 1 sheet, scale 1:250,000. Historia nomenclatural de la unidad: Hill (1891 en GEOLEX, 2007) utilizó el nombre de capas Glen Rose para diferenciar la parte superior del Grupo Trinity al referirse a las rocas que están expuestas a lo largo del Río Paluxy en las cercanías del poblado Glen Rose, en el Condado de Somerwell, Texas, Estados Unidos. Posteriormente, Freeman (1964 en GEOLEX, 2007) sustituye el término de capas por el de caliza Glen rose para una secuencia que aflora a lo largo del Río Grande en los Condados de Terrel y Brewster, Texas. Finalmente, Barnes (1967 en GEOLEX, 2007) es quien le da el rango de formación a dicha unidad. Localidad tipo: Se encuentra ubicada a lo largo del Río Paluxy en las inmediaciones del poblado de Glen Rose en el condado de Somerwell Texas, Estados Unidos (Hill, 1891). Descripción litológica: Esta formación consiste en gran parte de estratos de caliza, caliza arenosa, argilacea, alternando con estratos delgados de arcilla arenosa, arenisca y marga, los cuáles muestran diferente espesor, hacia la cima de dicha unidad la caliza es ligeramente más arenosa, también contiene material
    [Show full text]
  • Early Cretaceous (Albian) Decapods from the Glen Rose and Walnut Formations of Texas, USA
    Bulletin of the Mizunami Fossil Museum, no. 42 (2016), p. 1–22, 11 fi gs., 3 tables. © 2016, Mizunami Fossil Museum Early Cretaceous (Albian) decapods from the Glen Rose and Walnut formations of Texas, USA Carrie E. Schweitzer*, Rodney M. Feldmann**, William L. Rader***, and Ovidiu Fran㶥escu**** *Department of Geology, Kent State University at Stark, 6000 Frank Ave. NW, North Canton, OH 44720 USA <[email protected]> **Department of Geology, Kent State University, Kent, OH 44242 USA ***8210 Bent Tree Road, #219, Austin, TX 78759 USA ****Division of Physical and Computational Sciences, University of Pittsburgh Bradford, Bradford, PA 16701 USA Abstract Early Cretaceous (Albian) decapod crustaceans from the Glen Rose Limestone and the Walnut Formation include the new taxa Palaeodromites xestos new species, Rosadromites texensis new genus, new species, Karyosia apicava new genus new species, Aetocarcinus new genus, Aetocarcinus muricatus new species, and the new combinations Aetocarcinus roddai (Bishop, 1983), Necrocarcinus pawpawensis (Rathbun, 1935) and Necrocarcinus hodgesi (Bishop, 1983). These two formations have yielded a much less diverse decapod fauna than the nearly coeval and proximally deposited Pawpaw Formation. Paleoenvironment is suggested as a controlling factor in the decapod diversity of these units. Key words: Brachyura, Nephropidae, Dromiacea, Raninoida, Etyioidea, North America Introduction deposited in the shallow waters of a broad carbonate platform. Deposition occurred on the southeastern flank of Late Early Cretaceous decapod faunas from the Gulf the Llano Uplift and, on the seaward margin to the Coastal Plain of North America have been well reported northwest, behind the Stuart City Reef Trend. Coral and and described since the early part of the twentieth century rudist reefs, algal beds, extensive ripple marks, evaporites, (Rathbun, 1935; Stenzel, 1945).
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic Resource Evaluation Report, Lyndon B. Johnson
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Program Center Lyndon B. Johnson National Historical Park Geologic Resource Evaluation Report Natural Resource Report NPS/NRPC/GRD/NRR—2008/024 ON THE COVER: The cattle on the LBJ Ranch are descended from the same bloodline as the herd that Lyndon Johnson owned. They look more like 1960s Hereford cattle and so they can be called "history on the hoof." Lyndon B. Johnson National Historical Park Web site (www.nps.gov/lyjo, accessed 1/23/2008). NPS Photo Lyndon B. Johnson National Historical Park Geologic Resource Evaluation Report Natural Resource Report NPS/NRPC/GRD/NRR—2008/024 Geologic Resources Division Natural Resource Program Center P.O. Box 25287 Denver, Colorado 80225 February 2008 U.S. Department of the Interior Washington, D.C. The Natural Resource Publication series addresses natural resource topics that are of interest and applicability to a broad readership in the National Park Service and to others in the management of natural resources, including the scientific community, the public, and the NPS conservation and environmental constituencies. Manuscripts are peer- reviewed to ensure that the information is scientifically credible, technically accurate, appropriately written for the intended audience, and is designed and published in a professional manner. Natural Resource Reports are the designated medium for disseminating high priority, current natural resource management information with managerial application. The series targets a general, diverse audience, and may contain NPS policy considerations or address sensitive issues of management applicability. Examples of the diverse array of reports published in this series include vital signs monitoring plans; "how to" resource management papers; proceedings of resource management workshops or conferences; annual reports of resource programs or divisions of the Natural Resource Program Center; resource action plans; fact sheets; and regularly- published newsletters.
    [Show full text]
  • LOCAL SPOTLIGHT Edwards Aquifer, San Antonio, Texas, United States—Protecting Groundwater
    LOCAL SPOTLIGHT Edwards Aquifer, San Antonio, Texas, United States—Protecting groundwater Photo: © Blake Gordon Photo: © Blake Gordon North America Left. Officials release a benign "tracer dye" into Edwards Aquifer drainage systems to chart flows and track the underground water pathways. Right. Hydrogeologist descends into a sinkhole to check on the Edwards Aquifer. The challenge As one of the largest, most prolific artesian aquifers in the world, the Edwards Aquifer serves as the primary source of drinking water for nearly 2 million central Texans, including every resident of San Antonio—the second largest city in Texas—and much of the surrounding Hill Country. Its waters feed springs, rivers and lakes and sustain diverse plant and animal life, including rare and endangered species. The aquifer supports agricultural, industrial and recreational activities that not only sustain the Texas economy, but also contribute immeasurably to the culture and heritage of the Lone Star State. AUSTIN The aquifer stretches beneath 12 Texas counties, and the land above it includes several important hydrological areas. Two areas in particular— the drainage area and the recharge zone—replenish the aquifer by “catching” rainwater, which then seeps through fissures, cracks and sinkholes into the porous limestone that dominates the region. While this natural filtration system helps refill the aquifer with high-quality water, the growing city of San Antonio is expanding into territories of the very sensitive recharge zone, increasing the risk of contamination. In Edwards Aquifer SAN ANTONIO addition to a rising population, the state’s water supplies have been impacted by multi-year droughts. By 2060, Texas is projected to be home to approximately 50 million people while the annual available water resources are estimated to decrease by nearly 10 percent.
    [Show full text]
  • GSA Poster 2013 Long
    Hydrological and Geochemical Characteristics in the Edwards and Trinity Hydrostratigraphic Units Using Multiport Monitor Wells in the Balcones Fault Zone, Hays County, Central Texas Alan Andrews, Brian Hunt, Brian Smith Purpose Rising-falling K Slug-in K Slug-out K Zone Zone (ft/day) (ft/day) (ft/day) Thickness (ft) Trans ft2/day Stratigraphy 21 0.3 -- -- 35 10 Stratigraphy General Hydrologic ID To better understand the hydrogeological properties of and 20 53 -- -- 70 3700 Eagle Ford/ Hydrostratigraphy Function thickness in feet Lithology Porosity/Permeability Sources Rising-falling K Slug K Zone Transmissivity Qal? confining Zone (ft/day) (ft/day) Thickness (ft) (ft2/day) 19 5 8 6 30 140 40-50 Dense limestone Buda unit (CU) Low 18 3 3 -- 25 84 relationships between the geologic units that make up the Confining Units 14 -- -- 136 -- CU Blue-green to 17 38 -- 44 105 4000 Upper Del Rio 50-60 Upper Confining Unit 13 65 -- 72 13000 137.9’ Fract oyster wakestone yellow-brown clay 16 29 80 19 70 2000 12 2 -- 34 460 145.7’ stylolites and fract I Edwards, Upper and Middle Trinity Aquifers and to compare Georgetown Fm. CU Marly limestone; grnst Low 15 29 105 161 75 2100 40-60 11 4 -- 159 8300 Crystalline limestone; mdst to wkst 14 8 10 3 45 370 Leached and 199.6’ fossil (toucasid) vug Aquifer (AQ) III to milliolid grnst; chert; collapse High 10 0.09 -- 197 50 13 4 2 6 40 160 observed hydrologic properties of formations to generally accept- Collapsed mbrs 230’ solutioned bedding plane 30-80 breccia 9 0.005 -- 97 4 12 0.2 -- -- 85 -- 200 feet Reg.
    [Show full text]
  • Map Showing Geology and Hydrostratigraphy of the Edwards Aquifer Catchment Area, Northern Bexar County, South-Central Texas
    Map Showing Geology and Hydrostratigraphy of the Edwards Aquifer Catchment Area, Northern Bexar County, South-Central Texas By Amy R. Clark1, Charles D. Blome2, and Jason R. Faith3 Pamphlet to accompany Open-File Report 2009-1008 1Palo Alto College, San Antonio, TX 78224 2U.S. Geological Survey, Denver, CO 80225 3U.S. Geological Survey, Stillwater, OK 74078 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY U.S. Department of the Interior DIRK KEMPTHORNE, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Mark D. Myers, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Denver, Colorado: 2009 For product and ordering information: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS Suggested citation: Clark, A.R., Blome, C.D., and Faith, J.R, 2009, Map showing the geology and hydrostratigraphy of the Edwards aquifer catchment area, northern Bexar County, south- central Texas: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2009-1008, 24 p., 1 pl. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted material contained within this report. 2 Contents Page Introduction……………………………………………………………………….........……..…..4 Physical Setting…………………………………………………………..………….….….….....7 Stratigraphy……………..…………………………………………………………..….…7 Structural Framework………………...……….……………………….….….…….……9 Description of Map Units……………………………………………………….…………...….10 Summary……………………………………………………………………….…….……….....21 References Cited………………………………………….…………………………...............22 Figures 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Stewardship of the Edwards Aquifer
    STEWARDSHIP OF THE EDWARDS AQUIFER What is the Edwards Aquifer? “The Edwards Aquifer is one of the most valuable resources in the central How does this affect me? Aquifer: an underground area that holds enough water Texas area. In most places, it takes time for stormwater to travel to provide a usable supply. over land and filter through soil to reach the rivers and This aquifer provides water for lakes that supply drinking water to residents. In the municipal, industrial, and agricultural Edwards Aquifer region, recharge features provide a direct link between groundwater and our underground uses as well as sustaining a number of water supply. This means that stormwater pollution rare and endangered species. directly affects the quality of our drinking water. To preserve these beneficial uses, As a result, TCEQ has implemented extra water quality San Antonio ReportSan Texans must protect water quality in requirements to protect the aquifer. Examples include Source: this aquifer from degradation water quality treatments like rain gardens and water resulting from human activities.” quality ponds, as well as erosion and sedimentation While other aquifers in Texas are made up of sand and controls at construction sites. gravel, the Edwards Aquifer is a karst aquifer, composed - Texas Commission on Environmental of porous limestone formations that serve as conduits Quality (TCEQ), RG-348 for water as it travels underground. (Edwards Aquifer Authority) As shown in the graphic to the right, the Edwards Aquifer region encompasses much of South Central Texas. Portions of the City Antonio ReportSan of West Lake Hills lie within the Edwards Aquifer Contributing and Recharge Zones.
    [Show full text]
  • Wildlife Populations in Texas
    Wildlife Populations in Texas • Five big game species – White-tailed deer – Mule deer – Pronghorn – Bighorn sheep – Javelina • Fifty-seven small game species – Forty-six migratory game birds, nine upland game birds, two squirrels • Sixteen furbearer species (i.e. beaver, raccoon, fox, skunk, etc) • Approximately 900 terrestrial vertebrate nongame species • Approximately 70 species of medium to large-sized exotic mammals and birds? White-tailed Deer Deer Surveys Figure 1. Monitored deer range within the Resource Management Units (RMU) of Texas. 31 29 30 26 22 18 25 27 17 16 24 21 15 02 20 28 23 19 14 03 05 06 13 04 07 11 12 Ecoregion RMU Area (Ha) 08 Blackland Prairie 20 731,745 21 367,820 Cross Timbers 22 771,971 23 1,430,907 24 1,080,818 25 1,552,348 Eastern Rolling Plains 26 564,404 27 1,162,939 Ecoregion RMU Area (Ha) 29 1,091,385 Post Oak Savannah 11 690,618 Edwards Plateau 4 1,308,326 12 475,323 5 2,807,841 18 1,290,491 6 583,685 19 2,528,747 7 1,909,010 South Texas Plains 8 5,255,676 28 1,246,008 Southern High Plains 2 810,505 Pineywoods 13 949,342 TransPecos 3 693,080 14 1,755,050 Western Rolling Plains 30 4,223,231 15 862,622 31 1,622,158 16 1,056,147 39,557,788 Total 17 735,592 Figure 2. Distribution of White-tailed Deer by Ecological Area 2013 Survey Period 53.77% 11.09% 6.60% 10.70% 5.89% 5.71% 0.26% 1.23% 4.75% Edwards Plateau Cross Timbers Western Rolling Plains Post Oak Savannah South Texas Plains Pineywoods Eastern Rolling Plains Trans Pecos Southern High Plains Figure 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecoregions of Texas
    Ecoregions of Texas 23 Arizona/New Mexico Mountains 26 Southwestern Tablelands 30 Edwards Plateau 23a Chihuahuan Desert Slopes 26a Canadian/Cimarron Breaks 30a Edwards Plateau Woodland 23b Montane Woodlands 26b Flat Tablelands and Valleys 30b Llano Uplift 24 Chihuahuan Deserts 26c Caprock Canyons, Badlands, and Breaks 30c Balcones Canyonlands 24a Chihuahuan Basins and Playas 26d Semiarid Canadian Breaks 30d Semiarid Edwards Plateau 24b Chihuahuan Desert Grasslands 27 Central Great Plains 31 Southern Texas Plains 24c Low Mountains and Bajadas 27h Red Prairie 31a Northern Nueces Alluvial Plains 24d Chihuahuan Montane Woodlands 27i Broken Red Plains 31b Semiarid Edwards Bajada 24e Stockton Plateau 27j Limestone Plains 31c Texas-Tamaulipan Thornscrub 25 High Plains 29 Cross Timbers 31d Rio Grande Floodplain and Terraces 25b Rolling Sand Plains 29b Eastern Cross Timbers 25e Canadian/Cimarron High Plains 29c Western Cross Timbers 25i Llano Estacado 29d Grand Prairie 25j Shinnery Sands 29e Limestone Cut Plain 25k Arid Llano Estacado 29f Carbonate Cross Timbers 25b 26a 26a 25b 25e Level III ecoregion 26d 300 60 120 mi Level IV ecoregion 26a Amarillo 27h 60 0 120 240 km County boundary 26c State boundary Albers equal area projection 27h 25i 26b 25j 27h 35g 35g 26b Wichita 29b 35a 35c Lubbock 26c Falls 33d 27i 29d Sherman 35a 25j Denton 33d 35c 32a 33f 35b 25j 26b Dallas 33f 35a 35b 27h 29f Fort 35b Worth 33a 26b Abilene 32c Tyler 29b 24c 29c 35b 23a Midland 26c 30d 35a El Paso 24a 23b Odessa 35b 24a 24b 25k 27j 33f Nacogdoches 24d Waco Pecos 25j
    [Show full text]
  • Geological Society of America Bulletin
    Downloaded from gsabulletin.gsapubs.org on January 11, 2012 Geological Society of America Bulletin Structural framework of the Edwards Aquifer recharge zone in south-central Texas David A. Ferrill, Darrell W. Sims, Deborah J. Waiting, Alan P. Morris, Nathan M. Franklin and Alvin L. Schultz Geological Society of America Bulletin 2004;116, no. 3-4;407-418 doi: 10.1130/B25174.1 Email alerting services click www.gsapubs.org/cgi/alerts to receive free e-mail alerts when new articles cite this article Subscribe click www.gsapubs.org/subscriptions/ to subscribe to Geological Society of America Bulletin Permission request click http://www.geosociety.org/pubs/copyrt.htm#gsa to contact GSA Copyright not claimed on content prepared wholly by U.S. government employees within scope of their employment. Individual scientists are hereby granted permission, without fees or further requests to GSA, to use a single figure, a single table, and/or a brief paragraph of text in subsequent works and to make unlimited copies of items in GSA's journals for noncommercial use in classrooms to further education and science. This file may not be posted to any Web site, but authors may post the abstracts only of their articles on their own or their organization's Web site providing the posting includes a reference to the article's full citation. GSA provides this and other forums for the presentation of diverse opinions and positions by scientists worldwide, regardless of their race, citizenship, gender, religion, or political viewpoint. Opinions presented in this publication do not reflect official positions of the Society.
    [Show full text]
  • Groundwater Availability of the Barton Springs Segment of the Edwards Aquifer, Texas: Numerical Simulations Through 2050
    GROUNDWATER AVAILABILITY OF THE BARTON SPRINGS SEGMENT OF THE EDWARDS AQUIFER, TEXAS: NUMERICAL SIMULATIONS THROUGH 2050 by Bridget R. Scanlon, Robert E. Mace*, Brian Smith**, Susan Hovorka, Alan R. Dutton, and Robert Reedy prepared for Lower Colorado River Authority under contract number UTA99-0 Bureau of Economic Geology Scott W. Tinker, Director The University of Texas at Austin *Texas Water Development Board, Austin **Barton Springs Edwards Aquifer Conservation District, Austin October 2001 GROUNDWATER AVAILABILITY OF THE BARTON SPRINGS SEGMENT OF THE EDWARDS AQUIFER, TEXAS: NUMERICAL SIMULATIONS THROUGH 2050 by Bridget R. Scanlon, Robert E. Mace*1, Brian Smith**, Susan Hovorka, Alan R. Dutton, and Robert Reedy prepared for Lower Colorado River Authority under contract number UTA99-0 Bureau of Economic Geology Scott W. Tinker, Director The University of Texas at Austin *Texas Water Development Board, Austin **Barton Springs Edwards Aquifer Conservation District, Austin October 2001 1 This study was initiated while Dr. Mace was an employee at the Bureau of Economic Geology and his involvement primarily included initial model development and calibration. CONTENTS ABSTRACT .......................................................................................................................................1 INTRODUCTION..............................................................................................................................1 STUDY AREA...................................................................................................................................3
    [Show full text]