Downloaded from Brill.Com10/02/2021 03:34:02AM Via Free Access Charles D

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Downloaded from Brill.Com10/02/2021 03:34:02AM Via Free Access Charles D part i THE ARRIVAL OF THE REFORMED FAITH IN THE PALATINATE Charles D. Gunnoe - 9789004215061 Downloaded from Brill.com10/02/2021 03:34:02AM via free access Charles D. Gunnoe - 9789004215061 Downloaded from Brill.com10/02/2021 03:34:02AM via free access chapter two EARLY BATTLES: REFORMED PROTESTANTISM’S ARRIVAL IN THE PALATINATE “IwasfirstwithBoquininthechange of religion here.” Erastus to Johann Jakob Grynaeus, November , With increased attention now given to the confessionalization of the sec- ond half of the sixteenth century and especially the “Second Reforma- tion,” a study investigating the critical turn of Palatine history requires little justification. The Palatinate was the archetype for imperial territo- ries adopting a Reformed confession and played a fateful role that finally ran its course in the tragedy of the Thirty Years War.1 Thus any treat- ment of imperial politics or the nature of the Second Reformation must take the very important case of Heidelberg into account. Given the Palati- nate’s importance, the nature of its conversion to a Reformed confession remains a vital question. Political histories have generally focused on the personal religious decision of the monarch, Frederick III, the Pious (–). While the pioneering research in this field was done by August Kluckhohn more than a hundred years ago, in recent decades the late Volker Press enriched this discussion through his studies of the Pala- tine court and the influence of councilors like the Counts of Erbach. Press argued that the groundwork for the Reformation under Frederick III hadbeenlaidbynative,UpperGermanProtestantism2 and stressed 1 Henry J. Cohn, “Territorial Princes in Germany’s Second Reformation, –,” –; Meinrad Schaab, ed. Territorialstaat und Calvinismus (Stuttgart: W. Kolham- mer, ); Johannes Merz, “Calvinismus im Territorialstaat? Zur Begriffs- und Tradi- tionsbildung in der deutschen Historiographie,” Zeitschrift für Bayerische Landesgeschich- te (): –. See also Claus Peter Clasen, The Palatinate in European History – (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, ). 2 The expression “Upper German Protestantism” connotes the distinct Reformation tradition that emerged in cities such as Strasbourg and Augsburg—often at some vari- ance to Luther’s own teaching (especially regarding the Lord’s Supper). Representatives Charles D. Gunnoe - 9789004215061 Downloaded from Brill.com10/02/2021 03:34:02AM via free access chapter two continuity of the so-called “Calvinist” Reformation under Frederick III with the earlier reforms of Frederick II and Ottheinrich.3 Alternatively, theological studies have obsessively and sometimes rath- er ahistorically focused on the authorship and theological bent of the Heidelberg Catechism. Although a new consensus is emerging regard- ing the question of the authorship of the Catechism, the document itself can still bear divergent interpretations as to its theological character.4 The debate has largely centered on whether the Heidelberg Catechism is generally Melanchthonian or Calvinist in character. While not quarrel- ing with the aforementioned approaches, this chapter seeks to contribute to the understanding of the nature of the Heidelberg Reformed move- ment by investigating the role of one of the primary instigators of the confessional transformation. Erastus played a critical role as both rec- tor of the university and a member of the church council (Kirchenrat), as well as through writing and debating on behalf of the Reformed cause. When this late-Zwinglian’s role is fully appreciated, one can perceive how much the Reformation of the Palatinate was a pan-Reformed develop- ment, built on an Upper German foundation, and not simply a Calvinist or Melanchthonian achievement. of the Upper German Reformation included the signatories of the Tetrapolitan Confes- sion (). Martin Bucer (–) was perhaps the classic Upper German reformer. In Reformation scholarship, the description “Upper German” generally embraces the Zwinglians as well. 3 August Kluckhohn, “Wie ist Kurfürst Friedrich III. von der Pfalz Calvinist gewor- den?” Münchener Historisches Jahrbuch für (): –; Press, “Die ‘Zweite Reformation’ in der Kurpfalz,” –. In this essay, Press argued that the term “sec- ond Reformation” was not a fitting description of the Palatine Reformation, since there was a great deal of continuity between Frederick’s reform of the s and earlier Upper German trends. However, in an earlier article Press himself used the term “second refor- mation”todescribethe“Calvinist”turninPalatinehistory.SeeVolkerPress,“DieGrafen von Erbach und die Anfänge des reformierten Bekenntinisses in Deutschland,” in Aus Geschichte und ihren Hilfswissenschaften, ed. Hermann Bannasch and Hans-Peter Lach- man (Marburg: N.G. Elwert Verlag, ), –. 4 E.g., Fred H. Klooster, “The Priority of Ursinus in the Composition of the Heidel- berg Catechism,” Controversy and Conciliation: The Reformation of the Palatinate – , ed. Derk Visser (Allison Park, Penn.: Pickwick, ), –; Lyle Bierma, The Doctrine of the Sacraments in the Heidelberg Catechism: Melanchthonian, Calvinist, or Zwinglian? [Studies in Reformed Theology and History, New Series ] (Princeton: Prince- ton Theological Seminary, ). See the discussion of the Heidelberg Catechism in chap- ter . Charles D. Gunnoe - 9789004215061 Downloaded from Brill.com10/02/2021 03:34:02AM via free access reformed protestantism’s arrival in the palatinate The Confessional Situation in the Holy Roman Empire When Martin Luther posted his “Ninety-Five Theses” in , he could not have imagined that his internal critique of Catholic practice would ultimately lead to the creation of even one new church, and he would have been horrified to have thought that his protest would spawn three major magisterial churches and many splinter groups on the radical fringe. Luther’s message of justification by faith and acceptance of the scrip- tures alone as being authoritative found a receptive audience among the cities of the Holy Roman Empire, and soon it was no longer Luther’s proprietary teaching. A veritable army of preachers took up the evan- gelical mantle and remolded Luther’s ideas. In many cases these preach- ersappliedhisprincipleofsola scriptura in a more radical fashion than Luther himself. One such preacher, Huldrych Zwingli, the father of the Swiss-Reformed, led the evangelical movement in Zurich. The differ- ence between how Luther and Zwingli understood the Lord’s Supper would be the root of the separation of the continental Protestant move- ment into two main bodies, Lutheran and Reformed. Whereas Luther had himself attacked Catholic Eucharistic teaching—rejecting the doc- trine of transubstantiation as well as the Mass as a merit-generating sac- rifice, and calling for giving both bread and wine to the laity—he still embraced the traditional notion that Christ’s body and blood were phys- ically present “in, with, and under” the communion elements. Zwingli broke with medieval tradition and asserted that the Lord’s Supper was a memorial of Christ’s crucifixion. Christ’s body and blood were not present in the elements; rather, Christ remained in heaven, and Chris- tians simply remembered his efficacious death in the memorial celebra- tion. An attempt at the Marburg Colloquy in to bridge the split in the Protestant movement failed. Because Luther considered Zwingli and his followers to be heretics, deep hostility existed between the two centers of Protestantism. In the s when Protestantism gained official sanction in the Palati- nate, the difference of opinion on the Lord’s Supper remained of serious consequence to pan-Protestant unity. Whereas the diversity of opinions on the Lord’s Supper among Protestants may have looked like two con- flicting poles of truth and falsehood to Luther in when he issued his final condemnation of Zwingli, Oecolampadius, and Schwenckfeld, in the mid-s a non-partisan observer might have perceived a grad- ual continuum of positions. Wittenberg itself, where the Palatinate’s most famous son Phillip Melanchthon held sway after Luther’sdeath, remained Charles D. Gunnoe - 9789004215061 Downloaded from Brill.com10/02/2021 03:34:02AM via free access chapter two the foremost Lutheran intellectual center in the empire. Though long a leading proponent of the evangelical message, Melanchthon was hardly a slavish follower of Luther’stheology. He showed a willingness to accom- modate the Reformed in making changes to the text of the Augsburg Confession in the article treating the Lord’s Supper in (commonly called the Variata or altered version of the Augsburg Confession, as opposed to the original unaltered version of , which is known as the Invariata). Melanchthon further modified his position concerning the Lord’s Supper after Luther’s death. He rejected the Lutheran idea of the ubiquity of Christ’s human flesh and, like the Reformed, no longer held that Christ’s body and blood were physically consumed in the Lord’s Supper, leading Gnesio-Lutherans5 to derisively label Melanchthon and his followers “Crypto-Calvinists.” Recent studies have suggested that his Gnesio-Lutheran foes had finally exasperated Melanchthon beyond the point of reconciliation, and he was about to make a more definitive stance on behalf of his beleaguered “Calvinizing” allies at the time of his death in .6 His brand of Lutheranism, “Philippism,” or “Melanchthonianism,” remained a potent force in the empire at mid century. Strasbourg, a relatively short distance from Heidelberg up the well- traveled Rhine corridor, was a more immediate influence
Recommended publications
  • Protestant Reformed Theological Journal
    PROTESTANT REFORMED ,. THEOLOGICAL JOURNAL APRIL, 1989 VOLUME XXII, NO. 2 THEOLOGICAL SCHOOL O'F THE PROTESTANT REFORMED CHURCHES ! Z GRANDVILLE, MICHIGAN 1 I I L :_ APRIL, 1989 Volume XXII, No.2 PROTESTANT REFORMED THEOLOGICAL JOURNAL Edited for the faculty of The Theological School of the Protestant Reformed Churches Robert D. Decker David J. Engclsma Herman C. Hanko Homer C. Hoeksema by Prof. Herman Hanko (editor-in-chief) Prof. Robert Decker (editor, book reviews) The Protestant Reformed Theological Journal is published semiannually, in April and November, and distributeo in limited quantities, at no char~e. by the Theological School of the Protestant Reformed Churches. Interested persons desiring to have their names on the mailing list should write the Editor, at the address below. Books for review should be sent to the book review editor, also at the address of the school. Protestant Reformed Seminary 4949 Ivanrest Avenue Grandville, MI 49418 -.;:J..----- - -- ---~--.... TABLE OF CONTENTS Editorial Notes ' 2' The Doctrine of Predestination in Calvin and Beza Prof. Herman C. Hanko 3 Martin Bucer - "Fanatic of Unity" Prof. David j. Engelsma : 18 The Elders of the Church Prof. Robert D. Decker. ...................••......... 35 . Book Reviews '.' '' .. ~ 48 . Editorial Notes In this issue of our jourual \"'C arc continuing two series \vhich were be­ gun in earlicr issues. Prof. Hanko continues his series on "Calvin, Beza. and the Doctrinc of Predestination," and Prof. Engelsma continues and concludes his series on Martin Bucer. As we wrote in an earlier issue when Prof. Engclsma's series was begun, these articles were first delivered in lecture form in Mid-America Seminary in Orange City.
    [Show full text]
  • The Case of the Lost Luther Reference
    1 CONCORDIA 1 THEOLOGICAL QUARTERLY I Volume 43 Number 4 OCTOBER I979 .4nnouncement: -1 hird Annual Sq.mposium on the Lutheran Confessions ........................................... 271 Rabbinical LVritings of the Earl! Christian Centuries and Keu. Testament interpretation ....... Ravmond F. Surbi~rg273 I God's h,linisters. Their Calls. and Their Relationship to Each Other ................ Vetnon H. Harley 286 qar-ne W. Teigen 295 i The Case of the Lost Luther Reference ... The State of Evangelibrn in the i l,ut heran Church-Missouri SJ nod ............ E~Rin J. Kolb 3 10 I An .Application of Case Grammar to Two I New Testament Passages ..................... Theodore Mueller 330 A Reformation Hymn ............................... Douglas Judisch 326 > 3 Opinion of the Department of' Systematic Theolog~............ >2I Homiletical Studies .............................................................. 338 Book Reviews ........................................................................ 773 The Case of the Lost Luther Reference Bjarne W. Teigen The authors of the Formula of Concord appeal especially to Luther to cast further light on what they are expounding. They speak of him as "This highly enlightened man" (SD VII, 28), and call him the "chief teacher of the Augsburg Confession" (SD VII, 34). They particularly appeal to his writings on the Sacrament of the Altar in connection with Article VII and VIII of the Solid Declaration. A careful reading of the Formula of Concord shows that the confessors wanted to confess compIetely the doctrine
    [Show full text]
  • Mcgill University
    McGill University Faculty of Religious Studies RELG 323 CHURCH AND STATE SINCE 1300 A survey of major developments in the history of the doctrine and institutions of the Church, and the relation of the Church to the Commonwealth, from the later Middle Ages to the present. Birks Building, Room 105 Tuesdays/Thursdays 1:00—2:30 pm Professor: Torrance Kirby Office Hours: Birks 206, Tuesdays/Thursdays, 9:30—10:30 am Email: [email protected] COURSE SYLLABUS—WINTER TERM 2021 Date Reading 5 January INTRODUCTION I. LATE-MEDIEVAL CHURCH AND RENAISSANCE 7 January IMPERIAL SUPREMACY Boniface VIII, Unam Sanctam (1302) Marsilius of Padua, Defensor Pacis (1324) 12 January MYSTICAL SPIRITUALITY Julian of Norwich, Shewings of Divine Love (1393) 14 January ECCLESIASTICAL HIERARCHY Nicholas of Cusa, The Catholic Concordance (1433) 19 January NEOPLATONIC MYSTICISM Giovanni Pico della Mirandola, Oration on the Dignity of Man (1486) 21 January RENAISSANCE HUMANISM Nicollò Machiavelli, An Exhortation to Penitence (1495) II. REFORMATION 26 January JUSTIFICATION BY FAITH ALONE Martin Luther, Two Kinds of Righteousness (1520) 28 January A SEPARATE CHURCH Michael Sattler, Schleitheim Articles (1527) 2 February CHRISTIAN LIBERTY John Calvin, On the Necessity of Reforming the Church (1543) 4 February COUNTER REFORMATION Ignatius of Loyola, Spiritual Exercises (1548) Teresa of Ávila, The Way of Perfection (1573) Confirm Mid-Term Essay Topics Please consult style sheet, essay-writing guidelines, and evaluation rubric. 9 February RIGHT OF RESISTANCE Philippe Duplessis-Mornay, A Defence of Liberty against tyrants (1579) 11 February ERASTIANISM Richard Hooker, Of the Lawes of Ecclesiasticall Politie (1593) RELG 323 CHURCH AND STATE SINCE 1300 2 Date Reading III.
    [Show full text]
  • Defending Faith
    Spätmittelalter, Humanismus, Reformation Studies in the Late Middle Ages, Humanism and the Reformation herausgegeben von Volker Leppin (Tübingen) in Verbindung mit Amy Nelson Burnett (Lincoln, NE), Berndt Hamm (Erlangen) Johannes Helmrath (Berlin), Matthias Pohlig (Münster) Eva Schlotheuber (Düsseldorf) 65 Timothy J. Wengert Defending Faith Lutheran Responses to Andreas Osiander’s Doctrine of Justification, 1551– 1559 Mohr Siebeck Timothy J. Wengert, born 1950; studied at the University of Michigan (Ann Arbor), Luther Seminary (St. Paul, MN), Duke University; 1984 received Ph. D. in Religion; since 1989 professor of Church History at The Lutheran Theological Seminary at Philadelphia. ISBN 978-3-16-151798-3 ISSN 1865-2840 (Spätmittelalter, Humanismus, Reformation) Die Deutsche Nationalbibliothek lists this publication in the Deutsche Nationalbibliographie; detailed bibliographic data is available in the Internet at http://dnb.dnb.de. © 2012 by Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, Germany. This book may not be reproduced, in whole or in part, in any form (beyond that permitted by copyright law) without the publisher’s written permission. This applies particularly to reproduc- tions, translations, microfilms and storage and processing in electronic systems. The book was typeset by Martin Fischer in Tübingen using Minion typeface, printed by Gulde- Druck in Tübingen on non-aging paper and bound Buchbinderei Spinner in Ottersweier. Printed in Germany. Acknowledgements Thanks is due especially to Bernd Hamm for accepting this manuscript into the series, “Spätmittelalter, Humanismus und Reformation.” A special debt of grati- tude is also owed to Robert Kolb, my dear friend and colleague, whose advice and corrections to the manuscript have made every aspect of it better and also to my doctoral student and Flacius expert, Luka Ilic, for help in tracking down every last publication by Matthias Flacius.
    [Show full text]
  • John W. Welch, “'All Their Creeds Were an Abomination':A Brief Look at Creeds As Part of the Apostasy,”
    John W. Welch, “‘All Their Creeds Were an Abomination’:A Brief Look at Creeds as Part of the Apostasy,” in Prelude to the Restoration: From Apostasy to the Restored Church (Provo, UT and Salt Lake City: Religious Studies Center, Brigham Young University and Deseret Book, 2004), 228–249. “All Their Creeds Were an Abomination”: A Brief Look at Creeds as Part of the Apostasy John W. Welch John W. Welch is a professor of law at Brigham Young University and editor-in-chief of BYU Studies. On October 15, 1843, the Prophet Joseph Smith commented, “I cannot believe in any of the creeds of the different denominations, because they all have some things in them I cannot subscribe to, though all of them have some truth. I want to come up into the presence of God, and learn all things: but the creeds set up stakes, and say, ‘Hitherto [1] shalt thou come, and no further’; which I cannot subscribe to.” While Latter-day Saints gladly and gratefully recognize that all religious creeds contain some truth, the problem is that those formulations of doctrine also contain errors or impose limits that are “incompatible with the gospel’s inclusive commitment to truth and continual [2] revelation.” Such mixing of truth and error is reminiscent of the parable of the wheat and the tares, the Lord’s most [3] salient teaching on the nature of the Apostasy (Matthew 13:24–30, 37–43; JST Matthew 13; D&C 86:1–11). Thus, the creeds themselves, as vessels of mixed qualities, become metaphors or manifestations of the Apostasy itself.
    [Show full text]
  • The Creation of a Secular Inquisition in Early Modern Brabant
    Orthodoxy and Opposition: The Creation of a Secular Inquisition in Early Modern Brabant Item Type text; Electronic Dissertation Authors Christman, Victoria Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 10/10/2021 08:36:02 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/195502 ORTHODOXY AND OPPOSITION: THE CREATION OF A SECULAR INQUISITION IN EARLY MODERN BRABANT by Victoria Christman _______________________ Copyright © Victoria Christman 2005 A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY In the Graduate College THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 2 0 0 5 2 THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA GRADUATE COLLEGE As members of the Dissertation Committee, we certify that we have read the dissertation prepared by Victoria Christman entitled: Orthodoxy and Opposition: The Creation of a Secular Inquisition in Early Modern Brabant and recommend that it be accepted as fulfilling the dissertation requirement for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Professor Susan C. Karant Nunn Date: 17 August 2005 Professor Alan E. Bernstein Date: 17 August 2005 Professor Helen Nader Date: 17 August 2005 Final approval and acceptance of this dissertation is contingent upon the candidate’s submission of the final copies of the dissertation to the Graduate College. I hereby certify that I have read this dissertation prepared under my direction and recommend that it be accepted as fulfilling the dissertation requirement.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Groningen Word and Spirit in the Confessions of The
    University of Groningen Word and Spirit in the Confessions of the European Reformation van den Belt, Hendrik Published in: Religion and Theology IMPORTANT NOTE: You are advised to consult the publisher's version (publisher's PDF) if you wish to cite from it. Please check the document version below. Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Publication date: 2016 Link to publication in University of Groningen/UMCG research database Citation for published version (APA): van den Belt, H. (2016). Word and Spirit in the Confessions of the European Reformation. Religion and Theology , 23(1-2), 95-110. Copyright Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). The publication may also be distributed here under the terms of Article 25fa of the Dutch Copyright Act, indicated by the “Taverne” license. More information can be found on the University of Groningen website: https://www.rug.nl/library/open-access/self-archiving-pure/taverne- amendment. Take-down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Downloaded from the University of Groningen/UMCG research database (Pure): http://www.rug.nl/research/portal. For technical reasons the number of authors shown on this cover page is limited to 10 maximum. Download date: 29-09-2021 Word and Spirit in the Confessions of the European Reformation Henk van den Belt University of Groningen, The Netherlands [email protected] Abstract Protestant spirituality is characterized by the mutual relationship between Word and Spirit.
    [Show full text]
  • Hidden Lives: Asceticism and Interiority in the Late Reformation, 1650-1745
    Hidden Lives: Asceticism and Interiority in the Late Reformation, 1650-1745 By Timothy Cotton Wright A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Jonathan Sheehan, chair Professor Ethan Shagan Professor Niklaus Largier Summer 2018 Abstract Hidden Lives: Asceticism and Interiority in the Late Reformation, 1650-1745 By Timothy Cotton Wright Doctor of Philosophy in History University of California, Berkeley Professor Jonathan Sheehan, Chair This dissertation explores a unique religious awakening among early modern Protestants whose primary feature was a revival of ascetic, monastic practices a century after the early Reformers condemned such practices. By the early seventeenth-century, a widespread dissatisfaction can be discerned among many awakened Protestants at the suppression of the monastic life and a new interest in reintroducing ascetic practices like celibacy, poverty, and solitary withdrawal to Protestant devotion. The introduction and chapter one explain how the absence of monasticism as an institutionally sanctioned means to express intensified holiness posed a problem to many Protestants. Large numbers of dissenters fled the mainstream Protestant religions—along with what they viewed as an increasingly materialistic, urbanized world—to seek new ways to experience God through lives of seclusion and ascetic self-deprival. In the following chapters, I show how this ascetic impulse drove the formation of new religious communities, transatlantic migration, and gave birth to new attitudes and practices toward sexuality and gender among Protestants. The study consists of four case studies, each examining a different non-conformist community that experimented with ascetic ritual and monasticism.
    [Show full text]
  • 500Th Anniversary of the Lutheran Reformation
    500TH ANNIVERSARY OF THE LUTHERAN REFORMATION L LU ICA TH EL ER G A N N A S V Y E N E O H D T LUTHERAN SYNOD QUARTERLY VOLUME 57 • NUMBERS 2 & 3 JUNE & SEPTEMBER 2017 The journal of Bethany Lutheran Theological Seminary ISSN: 0360-9685 LUTHERAN SYNOD QUARTERLY VOLUME 57 • NUMBERS 2 & 3 JUNE & SEPTEMBER 2017 The journal of Bethany Lutheran Theological Seminary LUTHERAN SYNOD QUARTERLY EDITOR-IN-CHIEF........................................................... Gaylin R. Schmeling BOOK REVIEW EDITOR ......................................................... Michael K. Smith LAYOUT EDITOR ................................................................. Daniel J. Hartwig PRINTER ......................................................... Books of the Way of the Lord The Lutheran Synod Quarterly (ISSN: 0360-9685) is edited by the faculty of Bethany Lutheran Theological Seminary 6 Browns Court Mankato, Minnesota 56001 The Lutheran Synod Quarterly is a continuation of the Clergy Bulletin (1941–1960). The purpose of the Lutheran Synod Quarterly, as was the purpose of the Clergy Bulletin, is to provide a testimony of the theological position of the Evangelical Lutheran Synod and also to promote the academic growth of her clergy roster by providing scholarly articles, rooted in the inerrancy of the Holy Scriptures and the Confessions of the Evangelical Lutheran Church. The Lutheran Synod Quarterly is published in March and December with a combined June and September issue. Subscription rates are $25.00 U.S. per year for domestic subscriptions and $35.00 U.S. per year for international subscriptions. All subscriptions and editorial correspondence should be sent to the following address: Bethany Lutheran Theological Seminary Attn: Lutheran Synod Quarterly 6 Browns Ct Mankato MN 56001 Back issues of the Lutheran Synod Quarterly from the past two years are available at a cost of $10.00 per issue.
    [Show full text]
  • Philip Melanchthon the Protestant Preceptor of Germany 14971560
    PHILIP MELANC HTHON C H A PT ER I BI RTH AN D EAR LY Y EARS — — — Bretten Cl au s Schwar tze rd His S ons Philip S chwartzerd Born S — F choo —ohn U n e r—De ath His Brothe r and iste rs His irs t S l J g ’ — — in Pfor h eim o f Philip s Father and Grandfathe r R eu chl z — n e d Stu di e s G re e k N am e Cha g . C B EAR arlsruhe , the capital of aden , in the beautiful valley of the Kraichg au , is the little B . city of retten , with five thousand inhabitants Four hu n dred years ag o it belong ed to the Palat inat e m b m , and nu ered three hundred fa ilies as the s u m Fo r total of its population . a town so small it m enjoyed uch intercourse with the outside world , since throu gh its principal street passed a large part of the m erchandise carried from Italy to the lower B Rhine . u t the inhabitants of the town lived m ostly from the produce of their fertile fields . They m were simple in their anners , upright in their lives, and r o warmly attached to the Church . Their elig Phil ip Mel a nchth o n [ 1 497 ious faith was sincere ; but it was colo ured by the i n superstitions of the times , since that little Pala 1 0 tine city so late as 5 4 , five persons were convicted H of witchcraft and burned to death .
    [Show full text]
  • Benefitting from Luther's Small Catechism
    MAJT 28 (2017): 67-76 BENEFITTING FROM LUTHER’S SMALL CATECHISM … AS A CALVINIST by Daniel R. Hyde1 MARTIN LUTHER (1483–1546) was a hero. His contemporaries depicted him as everything from the angel of Revelation 14, an apostle, Daniel redivivus, Ezekiel’s good shepherd, one of three Mary’s at the tomb of a resurrected Christendom, prophets like Elijah, Enoch, Isaiah, and Jeremiah, and even Hercules Germanicus complete with lion pelt clothing and a club beating medieval theologians to death. 2 When Heinrich Bullinger (1504–1575) rejected the claim that Luther was an apostle, this led many of Luther’s followers to respond with lengthy refutations in sermons and writings that he in fact was an apostle.3 Perhaps this is to be expected of Luther’s fellow “Lutherans” (anachronistically speaking). What is not so expected is how Protestants of the “Reformed” or “Calvinist” kind (again, another anachronism) spoke of him in heroic terms. As early as 1520, Ulrich Zwingli (1484–1531) called Luther a contemporary Elijah.4 As well, after Luther died, the tendency for the Reformed was to focus their criticism on Luther’s so-called followers while leaving “the Big Man” alone. An example of this occurred one year after the Book of Concord was published (1580), when Christopher Grandmundt published a refutation of Lutheran “ubiquitist” theologians such as Jakob Andreae (1528–1590). Grandmundt said Andreae took extreme statements Luther uttered in the heat of controversy in order to buttress the Gnesio (“true”) Lutheran position. In contrast, Grandmundt said Luther merely exhibited his weakness in these utterances; it was his followers who were in serious error.
    [Show full text]
  • The Formula of Concord As a Model for Discourse in the Church
    21st Conference of the International Lutheran Council Berlin, Germany August 27 – September 2, 2005 The Formula of Concord as a Model for Discourse in the Church Robert Kolb The appellation „Formula of Concord“ has designated the last of the symbolic or confessional writings of the Lutheran church almost from the time of its composition. This document was indeed a formulation aimed at bringing harmony to strife-ridden churches in the search for a proper expression of the faith that Luther had proclaimed and his colleagues and followers had confessed as a liberating message for both church and society fifty years earlier. This document is a formula, a written document that gives not even the slightest hint that it should be conveyed to human ears instead of human eyes. The Augsburg Confession had been written to be read: to the emperor, to the estates of the German nation, to the waiting crowds outside the hall of the diet in Augsburg. The Apology of the Augsburg Confession, it is quite clear from recent research,1 followed the oral form of judicial argument as Melanchthon presented his case for the Lutheran confession to a mythically yet neutral emperor; the Apology was created at the yet not carefully defined border between oral and written cultures. The Large Catechism reads like the sermons from which it was composed, and the Small Catechism reminds every reader that it was written to be recited and repeated aloud. The Formula of Concord as a „Binding Summary“ of Christian Teaching In contrast, the „Formula of Concord“ is written for readers, a carefully- crafted formulation for the theologians and educated lay people of German Lutheran churches to ponder and study.
    [Show full text]