(Central Italy): Which Landscape Witnessed the Devel
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Central and Southern Italy Campania, Molise, Abruzzo, Marche, Umbria and Lazio Garigliano
EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR ENERGY DIRECTORATE D - Nuclear Safety and Fuel Cycle Radiation Protection Main Conclusions of the Commission’s Article 35 verification NATIONAL MONITORING NETWORK FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY Central and Southern Italy Campania, Molise, Abruzzo, Marche, Umbria and Lazio DISCHARGE AND ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING Garigliano NPP Date: 12 to 17 September 2011 Verification team: Mr C. Gitzinger (team leader) Mr E. Henrich Mr. E. Hrnecek Mr. A. Ryan Reference: IT-11/06 INTRODUCTION Article 35 of the Euratom Treaty requires that each Member State shall establish facilities necessary to carry out continuous monitoring of the levels of radioactivity in air, water and soil and to ensure compliance with the basic safety standards (1). Article 35 also gives the European Commission (EC) the right of access to such facilities in order that it may verify their operation and efficiency. For the EC, the Directorate-General for Energy (DG ENER) and in particular its Radiation Protection Unit (at the time of the visit ENER.D.4, now ENER.D.3) is responsible for undertaking these verifications. The main purpose of verifications performed under Article 35 of the Euratom Treaty is to provide an independent assessment of the adequacy of monitoring facilities for: - Liquid and airborne discharges of radioactivity into the environment by a site (and control thereof). - Levels of environmental radioactivity at the site perimeter and in the marine, terrestrial and aquatic environment around the site, for all relevant pathways. - Levels of environmental radioactivity on the territory of the Member State. Taking into account previous bilateral protocols, a Commission Communication has been published in the Official Journal on 4 July 2006 with a view to define some practical arrangements for the conduct of Article 35 verification visits in Member States. -
Cry Havoc Règles Fr 05/01/14 17:46 Page1 Guiscarduiscard
maquette historique UK v2_cry havoc règles fr 05/01/14 17:46 Page1 Guiscarduiscard HISTORY & SCENARIOS maquette historique UK v2_cry havoc règles fr 05/01/14 17:46 Page2 © Buxeria & Historic’One éditions - 2014 - v1.1 maquette historique UK v2_cry havoc règles fr 05/01/14 17:46 Page1 History Normans in Southern Italy and Sicily in the 11th Century 1 - The historical context 1.1 - Southern Italy and Sicily at the beginning of the 11th Century Byzantium had conquered Southern Italy and Sicily in the first half of the 6th century. But by the end of that century, Lombards coming from Northern Italy had conquered most of the peninsula, with Byzantium retaining only Calabria and Sicily. From the middle of the 9th century, the Aghlabid Dynasty of Ifrîquya (the original name of Eastern Maghreb) raided Sicily to take possession of the island. A new Byzantine offensive at the end of the century took back most of the lost territories in Apulia and Calabria and established Bari as the new provincial capital. Lombard territories further north were broken down between three cities led by princes: Capua, Salerno, and Benevento. Further east, Italian duchies of Naples, Amalfi, and Gaeta tried to keep their autonomy through successive alliances with the various regional powers to try and maintain their commercial interests. Ethnic struggles in Sicily between Arabs and Berbers on the one side, and various dynasties on the other side, led to power fragmentation: The island is divided between four rival military factions at the beginning of the 11th century. Beyond its natural boundaries, Southern Italy had to cope with two external powers which were looking to expel Byzantium from what they considered was part of their area of influence: the Papacy and the Holy Roman Empire. -
Map 44 Latium-Campania Compiled by N
Map 44 Latium-Campania Compiled by N. Purcell, 1997 Introduction The landscape of central Italy has not been intrinsically stable. The steep slopes of the mountains have been deforested–several times in many cases–with consequent erosion; frane or avalanches remove large tracts of regolith, and doubly obliterate the archaeological record. In the valley-bottoms active streams have deposited and eroded successive layers of fill, sealing and destroying the evidence of settlement in many relatively favored niches. The more extensive lowlands have also seen substantial depositions of alluvial and colluvial material; the coasts have been exposed to erosion, aggradation and occasional tectonic deformation, or–spectacularly in the Bay of Naples– alternating collapse and re-elevation (“bradyseism”) at a staggeringly rapid pace. Earthquakes everywhere have accelerated the rate of change; vulcanicity in Campania has several times transformed substantial tracts of landscape beyond recognition–and reconstruction (thus no attempt is made here to re-create the contours of any of the sometimes very different forerunners of today’s Mt. Vesuvius). To this instability must be added the effect of intensive and continuous intervention by humanity. Episodes of depopulation in the Italian peninsula have arguably been neither prolonged nor pronounced within the timespan of the map and beyond. Even so, over the centuries the settlement pattern has been more than usually mutable, which has tended to obscure or damage the archaeological record. More archaeological evidence has emerged as modern urbanization spreads; but even more has been destroyed. What is available to the historical cartographer varies in quality from area to area in surprising ways. -
4 Regional Park of Roccamonfina // Foce Garigliano 12 Roccamonfina
index 4 Regional Park of Roccamonfina // Foce Garigliano 12 Roccamonfina 28 Sessa Aurunca 44 Galluccio 56 Conca della Campania 66 Tora e Piccilli 76 Marzano Appio 86 Teano 100 Foce Garigliano 102 Tour of the Castles This guide, handy and user-friendly, translated both in English and German, inaugurates the editorial line of publications on the territory of the Park and is the first significant attempt to give this area the visibility it deserves. And it does this by telling the tourist about the treasures within its domain. The beauty, the richness, the timeless historical inspiration permeating the medieval towns and ancient pathways. An extraordinary journey accompanies the visitor in the shade of age-old chestnut trees, the discovery of evocative archaeological sites and of places with unrivalled art, mingling popular memory and folklore customs, blending ancient knowledge and culinary delights from the local gastronomic tradition. A territory which arrests the soul in its unrivalled spaces, colours and flavours, capable of offering the tourist a unique opportunity to rediscover the joy of nature and the pleasure of the good life. The task of the Parks Body, and my own personal task, is to act to protect and promote this small but great microcosm, allowing it to fully achieve its economic and social potential through a series of targeted initiatives, beginning with the present guide. Initiatives which can transform the naturalistic, historical and cultural heritage around the extinct Volcano of Roccamonfina into an important reservoir for the local Photo by Raffaella by Minucci Photo economy, in the conviction that this may be achieved by opening the territory up to a tourism that is both vigilant and conscientious. -
Quaternary International 425 (2016) 198E213
Quaternary International 425 (2016) 198e213 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Quaternary International journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/quaint Geomorphological features of the archaeological marine area of Sinuessa in Campania, southern Italy * Micla Pennetta a, , Corrado Stanislao a, Veronica D'Ambrosio a, Fabio Marchese b, Carmine Minopoli c, Alfredo Trocciola c, Renata Valente d, Carlo Donadio a a Department of Earth Sciences, Environment and Resources, University of Naples Federico II, Largo San Marcellino 10, 80138 Napoli, Italy b Department of Environment, Territory and Earth Sciences, University of Milano Bicocca, Piazza dell'Ateneo Nuovo 1, 20126 Milano, Italy c Italian National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic Development e ENEA, Portici Research Centre, Piazzale Enrico Fermi 1, Granatello, 80055 Portici, NA, Italy d Department of Civil Engineering, Design, Building, Environment, Second University of Naples, Via Roma 8, 81031 Aversa, CE, Italy article info abstract Article history: Submarine surveys carried out since the '90s along the coastland of Sinuessa allowed us to draw up a Available online 6 June 2016 geomorphological map with archaeological findings. Along the sea bottom, 650 m off and À7 m depth, a Campanian Ignimbrite bedrock was detected: dated ~39 kyr BP, its position is incompatible with the Keywords: current sea level. Towards the northern edge of the shoal, a depressed area with 24 cubic elements in Coastal geomorphology concrete was surveyed. These artefacts (pilae) are typical of Roman maritime structures widespread Geoarchaeology along the southernmost Phlegrean coast. Beachrocks and accessory landforms at the same depth of Sedimentology bedrock suggest that this was emerging and attended by man in Roman times, even for activities related Sea level change Italy to port facilities. -
Actinides Measurements on Environmental Samples of the Garigliano
Actinides measurements on environmental samples of the Garigliano Nuclear 1Power Plant1 (Italy)1 during the1 decommissioning1 phase* 1 A. Petraglia , . !irignano , ". #uompane , A. $%&nofrio , . !ab'arese , A. (. )sposito , +. ,errasi 1 *CI" ), Dipartimento di Matematica e Fisica, Università degli Studi della Campania “0. Vanvitelli” Caserta, Italy SoGIN, Garigliano NPP, Sessa Aurunca (Caserta) An environmental survey was carried out in order ris? perception among the population 'y means to provide an ade3uate and updated assessment of obCective and verifiable scientific data. the radiological impact that the decommissioning In the above campaigns we did, natural and operations of the Garigliano NNP may have procured to the environment of*45 the*46 surrounding*47 area. !ome isotopes*48 of*9: uranium ( U, U, U) and plutonium ( 6:Pu, 137 Pu) and 9: some ;<emitter radionuclides ( o, s and >,) were measured to 3uantify the possi'le contamination and identify the origin source. Actinides isotopes were measured with the AM! techni3ue that is able to detect elements in traces and reach sensitivity that cannot 'e obtained with other methods. ,he results show that the anthropogenic component is essentially due to the atmospheric fallout and no contamination can 'e charged to the NPP. $ata are represented in geo-referenced maps to highlight the distri'ution area and some particular aspects of each measured radionuclide. +igure 1. ,he Garigliano Nuclear Power Plant, Introduction !essa Aurunca ) – Italy. ,he study of the radiological impact of a Nuclear -
Appendix Epsilon
Appendix Epsilon: The Pavia Intellectual Line Connecting brothers of Phi Kappa Psi Fraternity at Cornell University, tracing their fraternal Big Brother/Little Brother line to tri-Founder John Andrew Rea (1869) John Andrew Rea, tri-founder of Phi Kappa Psi at Cornell . . was advised by Andrew Dickson White, . Olybrius was nephew to Flavius President of Cornell . Maximus . who was lectured by, and referred Jack . Flavius Maximus was grandson to Sextus Rea to, Washington Irving . Probus . and then through the Halle line, Appendix . Sextus Probus was son-in-law and first Delta, to the University of Pavia . cousin to Quintus Olybrius . . Pavia was elevated by the Carolingian . Quintus Olybrius was the son of to Clodius Emperor Lothair . Celsinus Adelphus spouse to Faltonia Betitia Proba . whose grandfather deposed the last . all of the above were Neo-Platonists in the Lombardic king Desiderius . tradition of Plotinus . who ruled in succession to the founder of . Plotimus was a student of Ammonius, he of his dynasty, Alboin . Numenius, he of Pythagoras, he of Pherecydes . Alboin forcefully married Rosamund, . Pythagoras also studied under princess of the Gepids . Anaximenes, he under Anaximander, he under Thales . Rosamund was daugther to Cunimund, last . king of the Gepids. Thales studied in the school of Egyption priest Petiese, who was invested by king Psamtik . the story of Cunimund’s court was . who served under Assyria king preserved by Cassiodorus . Esarhaddon, successor to Sennencherib . . Cassiodorus succeeded Boethius as first . successor to the two Sargons . Minister to the Ostrogoths . Boethius was grandson of Emperor Olybrius . Below we present short biographies of the Pavia intellectual line of the Phi Kappa Psi Fraternity at Cornell University. -
Hindered Passages. the Failed Muslim Con- Quest of Southern Italy
JTMS 2014; 1(1): 51–73 Marco Di Branco and Kordula Wolf Hindered Passages. The Failed Muslim Con- quest of Southern Italy Abstract: The establishment of an Aghlabid, then Fāṭimid-Kalbid dominion in Sicily had a deep impact not only on the island and on Mediterranean power constellations, but also on mainland Italy, especially in its Southern parts. Al- though the Peninsula was under continuous attack between the ninth and elev- enth centuries, all attempts to place it under submission failed on a long-term basis. Examining three examples of ‘hindered passages’, this article proposes some new considerations about the question of this missed Muslim conquest. Besides the numerous raids, the establishment of many military bases and Christian-Muslim agreements on the mainland during the Aghlabid and Fā- ṭimid-Kalbid period points to a targeted politics of conquest. Furthermore, the fragmentation of Southern Italy, often claimed as the main cause for the ‘Sara- cen’ destructions, could, on the contrary, also be seen as the main obstacle to Muslim expansion due to its many fortified centres. Keywords: Southern Italy, Muslim Sicily, Islamic conquest, Aghlabids, Kalbids DOI 10.1515/jtms-2014-0003 || Marco Di Branco, Deutsches Historisches Institut, Roma, [email protected] Kordula Wolf, Deutsches Historisches Institut, Roma, [email protected] 1 State of the Art Between the ninth and the eleventh century, Southern Italy and Sicily were confronted with a strong Muslim presence structurally linked to the two great Islamic dynasties of North Africa, the Aghlabids and the Fāṭimids.1 In Sicily, soon after the first successful operations of the Aghlabid military leader and “qāḍī” Asad ibn al-Furāt (d. -
Campania Checked
! CAMPANIA: NATURALLY BLESSED BY SUN AND SEA Where Napoli is the capital city of Campania Region. I t i s t h e m o s t d e n s e l y populated Italian Region. Weather Campania is a southern region in Italy, and is the second- most-populous region. From the mouth of the Garigliano This Region has the typical River to the Gulf of Policastro, Campania stretches along Mediterranean weather by the the Tyrrhenian Sea offering abundance in breathtaking coastline while in the mountain landscapes, fertile lands, and some of the best known a r e a s i n s i d e t h e r e i s a continental climate. attractions in Italy. Campania is known for the seemingly boundless rolling hills, with the exception of the Matese Mountains bordering Molise, and the rugged Irpinia area. Another of Italy’s all-season tourist spots, travelers can enjoy summers along the coast, visit inland towns during the spring and autumn months, and despite the abundant snowfall in the winter, the mountainous regions are also very pleasant. Boasting some of the most beautiful natural landmarks in the world, Campania has everything any holiday could ask for. From the unmatched splendors of the Amalfi Coast, to one of the very few still active volcanoes in Europe, Vesuvius on the Gulf of Naples, there is plenty to see to create a rich Italian experience with memories sure to last a lifetime. www.helloitalytours.com !1 ! Food Specialities TOURS AND ACTIVITIES Mountain Sports: Underground excursions, cross-country Mozzarella di Bufala: An Italian skiing, hiking, and mountain scenery of unrivalled beauty cheese made from the milk of the are only a few of the opportunities for tourists in the water buffalo is something to be mountainous area. -
INTRODUCTION Thomas James Dandelet and John A. Marino
INTRODUCTION Thomas James Dandelet and John A. Marino On December 28–29, 1503, “the Great Captain,” Gonzalo Fernández de Córdoba, scored a definitive military victory for Ferdinand the Catholic against the French in the battle for the Kingdom of Naples at the Garigliano River. He had developed the strategic advantage of the Spanish tercios—light cavalry, infantry pikemen, and arquebus- armed infantry in a combined force—with his victory at Cerignola in the Tavoliere di Puglia eight months earlier on April 28. From there his Spanish forces marched to Naples, entered the city in tri- umph on May 16 to the jubilant reception of its noble citizenry, and departed again on June 18 for Gaeta and the final assault against the French at Garigliano. In Naples news of that victory touched off three days of continuous celebration, fireworks, and religious cer- emonies of thanksgiving with Gonzalo de Córdoba returning quietly on January 14, 1504, to become the first Spanish viceroy of the newly conquered Kingdom of Naples.1 With the Spanish conquest of southern Italy complete, together with the long-standing rule of Sicily from 1282 and Sardinia from 1297 through his Aragonese kingdom, Ferdinand the Catholic had taken a major step towards the eventual Spanish pacification and domination of much of Italy. Five aspects of the Spanish domination of Italy that changed the political landscape had been established before 1504. First, Italy had become an integral part of Aragonese ambitions for Catalan mercantile expansion and a Western Mediterranean “empire.” Sicily, Sardinia, and Naples were essential pieces of Aragon’s European puzzle, and partnering with Genoese financiers was common prac- tice for all three of the Iberian powers—Aragon, Castile, and Por- tugal—in their designs on North and West Africa, and beyond. -
Cassino-Anzio
BATTLE CAMPAIGNS Extraced from "Ambassador in Arms: The Story of Hawaii's100th Battalion by Thomas D. Murphy Cassino to Anzio Campaign Part I January 17, 1944 - February 22, 1944 D Day for the amphibious assault was set for 22 January, 1944. 17 January - X Corps would attack across the Garigliano River on a line extending along that stream from the sea to S. Ambroglio. Three days later the 36th Division would push across the Rapido River and establish a bridgehead in the S. Angelo area. On the right of the 36th the 34th Division would make a demonstration to keep German reserves in the Cassino area, and would hold itself ready to move across the S. Angelo bridgehead against Cassino or to pass through the 36th and up the Liri Valley to the northwest. These plans contemplated a breakthrough south of Cassino's defenses. Though X Corps had established a bridgehead across the Garigliano by the end of January, it breached only the outer works of the Gustav Line, and the 36th Division's attack in the S. Angelo sector. 20-22 January - Had been a costly failure. As a result it was now planned that the 34th Division should cross the Rapido River in an attempt to break through the German defenses north and west of Cassino. In this area the Rapido cut across the eastern edge of the Liri Valley, flowed southwest from S. Elia and just east of Cassino, and joined the Gari River four miles below that city. West of the Rapido, the Gustav Line ran roughly southwest from Mt. -
Battle of Monte Cassino
Battle of Monte Cassino 17 January thru 18 May 1944 Monte Cassino Abbey in November 2004 The Battle of Monte Cassino (also known as the Battle for Rome and the Battle for Cassino) was a costly series of four assaults by the Allies against the Winter Line in Italy held by the Germans and Italians during the Italian Campaign of World War II. The intention was a breakthrough to Rome. At the beginning of 1944, the western half of the Winter Line was being anchored by Germans holding the Rapido, Liri, and Garigliano valleys and some of the surrounding peaks and ridges. Together, these features formed the Gustav Line. Monte Cassino, a historic hilltop abbey founded in AD 529 by Benedict of Nursia, dominated the nearby town of Cassino and the entrances to the Liri and Rapido valleys, but had been left unoccupied by the German defenders. The Germans had, however, manned some positions set into the steep slopes below the abbey's walls. 1 Fearing that the abbey did form part of the Germans' defensive line, primarily as a lookout post, the Allies sanctioned its bombing on 15 February and American bombers proceeded to drop 1,400 tons of bombs onto it. The destruction and rubble left by the bombing raid now provided better protection from aerial and artillery attacks, so, two days later, German paratroopers took up positions in the abbey's ruins. Between 17 January and 18 May, Monte Cassino and the assaulted four times by Allied troops, the last involving twenty divisions attacking along a twenty-mile Gustav defenses were front.