Histukmodm Lp 1 of 696 Battle of Britain Zim:///A/Battle of Britain.Html

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Histukmodm Lp 1 of 696 Battle of Britain Zim:///A/Battle of Britain.Html Battle of Britain Bodyline Catherine Cranston Edward VII of the United Ki.. Edward VIII of the United K Elizabeth II of the United Francis Crick George V of the United Kingdom George VI of the United Kin Henry Joseph Wood J. J Khudai Khidmatgar Supermarine Spitfire The Blitz Treaty of Versailles Western Front (World War I) histukmodm_lp_1 of 696 Battle of Britain zim:///A/Battle_of_Britain.html Battle of Britain 2008/9 Schools Wikipedia Selection. Related subjects: British History Post 1900; World War II "Battle for Britain" redirects here. There is also a David Bowie song of that title. For the Private Eye comic strip, see Battle for Britain (Private Eye). Battle of Britain Battle of Britain is Part of Second World War the name given to the strategic effort by the Luftwaffe histukmodm_lp_2 of 696 1 of 71 11/10/2011 09:08 Battle of Britain zim:///A/Battle_of_Britain.html during the Second World War to gain air superiority over Fighter Command. The name derives from an 18 June 1940 speech in the House of Commons by Prime Minister An aerial observer scans the skies of London. Winston Churchill, "The Battle of Date 10 July 1940 – 31 October 1940 France is over. I Location United Kingdom airspace expect the Battle of Result Decisive British victory Britain is about to Belligerents begin..." histukmodm_lp_3 of 696 2 of 71 11/10/2011 09:08 Battle of Britain zim:///A/Battle_of_Britain.html Had it been successful, the United Kingdom Germany planned Italy amphibious and Commanders airborne landings in Hugh Dowding Hermann Göring Britain of Keith Park Albert Kesselring Operation Sealion would have Trafford Leigh- Hugo Sperrle Mallory followed. The Hans-Jürgen Stumpff Battle of Britain C. J. Quintin Brand Rino Corso Fougier was the first major Richard Saul campaign to be Strength fought entirely by 754 single-seat fighters 1,107 single-seat fighters air forces. It was 149 two-seat fighters 357 two-seat fighters the largest and histukmodm_lp_4 of 696 3 of 71 11/10/2011 09:08 Battle of Britain zim:///A/Battle_of_Britain.html most sustained bombing campaign attempted560 bombers up until that date. 1,380The failure bombers of Nazi Germany to destroy Britain's500 coastal air defence or to break428 dive-bombersBritish morale is considered their first major1,963 defeat. total 569 reconnaissance 233 coastal Neither Hitler nor the Oberkommando der Wehrmacht4,074 total (OKW) believed it possible to carry out a successful amphibiousCasualties assaultand losses on the British Isles until the RAF had beenFighter neutralized. Command: 1,023Secondary873 fightersobjectives were to destroy aircraft productionfighters and ground infrastructure, to attack areas of 1,014 bombers political significance, andBomber to terrorize Command: the British376 1,887 people total into. seeking an armistice or surrender. Somebombers historians have argued no invasion could have succeeded, assertingCoastal the massive Command: superiority 148 of the Royal Navy over the Kriegsmarine wouldaircraft have 1,547 made total .Sealion a disaster. They argue the Luftwaffe would have27,450 been civilians unable dead,to prevent decisive intervention by British cruisers and destroyers,32,138 wounded even with air superiority. histukmodm_lp_5 of 696 4 of 71 11/10/2011 09:08 Battle of Britain zim:///A/Battle_of_Britain.html British historians date the battle from 10 July to 31 October 1940 , which represented the most intense period of daylight bombing. German historians usually place the beginning of the battle in mid-August 1940 and end it in May 1941, on the withdrawal of the bomber units in preparation for the attack on the USSR. Background Luftwaffe attacks on Britain began with raids on naval targets, with bombers being shot down over the Firth of Forth on 16 October 1939 and over Scapa Flow on the following day, but there were no major attacks during the Phoney War period, a lull in fighting that Hitler ended on 10 May 1940 with his invasion of the Low Countries. Following the evacuation of the British from Dunkirk (Operation histukmodm_lp_6 of 696 5 of 71 11/10/2011 09:08 Battle of Britain zim:///A/Battle_of_Britain.html DYNAMO ), and the French surrender on 22 June 1940, Hitler believed the war was practically over and the British, defeated on the continent and without European allies, would quickly come to terms with Germany. Although there was an element of British public and political sentiment favouring negotiated peace with a clearly ascendant Germany, among them the Foreign Secretary, Lord Halifax, the recently-installed Churchill nonetheless refused to consider an armistice with Hitler's Germany. Churchill's skillful use of rhetoric hardened public opinion against a peaceful resolution and prepared the British for a long war. On 16 July, in an effort to finish the war in the west, Hitler ordered the rapid preparation of a plan to invade Britain. Hitler hoped to frighten Britain into peace and saw the preparations as a means to apply pressure. The plan was prepared by OKW. The operation, code-named histukmodm_lp_7 of 696 6 of 71 11/10/2011 09:08 Battle of Britain zim:///A/Battle_of_Britain.html Seelöwe ("Sealion"), was scheduled for mid-September 1940 and called for landings on the south coast of Great Britain, backed by an airborne assault. All preparations were to be made by mid-August. The Kriegsmarine was reluctant to launch an invasion, and on 11 July, Admiral Raeder told Hitler invasion could only be contemplated as a last resort, and only then with full air superiority. The Kriegsmarine had a limited number of ships, while the Royal Navy had over 50 destroyers and dozens of cruisers and battleships in home waters. In the event of a seaborne invasion, the British Home Fleet would sortie from their nearby bases and attack the invasion force, something the Kriegsmarine could do little to counter. The only way Germany would be able to prevent Royal Navy interference would be with the Luftwaffe , primarily using dive bombers, which would require complete air superiority, because the bombers were so vulnerable to attack. Nevertheless, Hitler histukmodm_lp_8 of 696 7 of 71 11/10/2011 09:08 Battle of Britain zim:///A/Battle_of_Britain.html was determined the invasion go ahead and ordered all services to make preparations for an amphibious assault once air superiority had been achieved. Opposing forces The Luftwaffe was facing a more capable opponent than it had met before: a sizable, highly-coordinated, well-supplied air force, fielding aircraft able to match the German Messerschmitt Bf 109E and Bf 110C. The majority of the RAF's fighting would rest upon the workhorse Hurricane Mk I. More shocking to the German pilots was the newer Spitfire Mk I, which was quickly recognised as a world-class fighter. Most of the fighters they had encountered thus far in the war had not, despite mainly strong showings by opposing pilots, reached this standard. histukmodm_lp_9 of 696 8 of 71 11/10/2011 09:08 Battle of Britain zim:///A/Battle_of_Britain.html Aircraft The Bf 109E was marginally superior to the Hurricane. The Bf 109E and the Spitfire, in certain key areas, had the advantage over each other. The 109 could outclimb both. The Spitfire was slightly faster at medium heights, was more manoeuvrable, and possessed a stronger airframe as well as heavier armour than the Bf 109E-1. However, because of their carburetted engines, neither it nor the Hurricane could simply dive away from an opponent, as the 109 could. The Spitfire, initially, had a better protected cockpit with bulletproof windscreen and an armoured plate behind the pilot's seat. The Messerschmitt Bf 109 E-3 received extra armour behind the pilots head, and seat armour. The canopy was also modified for better visibility. The Bf 109 was also equipped with Self-sealing fuel tanks, although this could not prevent destruction from tracer rounds. histukmodm_lp_10 of 696 9 of 71 11/10/2011 09:08 Battle of Britain zim:///A/Battle_of_Britain.html The Bf 109 had a slightly higher speed at high altitude, better dive speed, and a fuel injected engine (the Daimler-Benz DB 601), giving Germans the ability to perform negative-gee manoeuvres without the engine cutting out, and thus the option to disengage at will. This advantage could prove moot when pursuing a Spitfire. The superioriy of the Spitfires rate of roll would ensure the Messerschmitt overshot, should the Spitfire pilot perform a half-roll, then dive. The German fighter would gain too much speed, lessening the response of its control surfaces due to the pressure, and then would be unable to correct and counter the Spitfires defensive manoeuvre. The German fighter had a heavier armament, with its two 20 mm MG FF cannon. This gave it a greater punch than the eight .303 (7.7 mm) machineguns of the British fighters, but the low muzzle velocity of the cannon, where the shells dropped quite quickly after firing, meant the Messerschmitt pilots had to open fire from close range. histukmodm_lp_11 of 696 10 of 71 11/10/2011 09:08 Battle of Britain zim:///A/Battle_of_Britain.html On 22 November 1939 a Bf 109E-3 (Wk-Nr 1304 of JG 76 ) landed intact in France. Evaluated at RAF Farnborough, the Bf 109 was used in mock combats with Spitfire Mk Is. The RAF test pilots found the Bf 109 "superior in all aspects bar monoeuvrability and turning circle". Level speed was reported to be even, however when the Bf 109 pulled out of a dive at speed and then proceeded to climb steeply at slow speed, the Spitfire had difficult in keeping up. The margins were apparently reduced when the Spitfire was fitted with a constant speed airscrew.
Recommended publications
  • MIŠEL ŠANTL Bitka Za Britaniju (1939. – 1940.) Završni
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by Croatian Digital Thesis Repository Sveučilište Jurja Dobrile u Puli Filozofski fakultet MIŠEL ŠANTL Bitka za Britaniju (1939. – 1940.) Završni rad Pula, 2016. Sveučilište Jurja Dobrile u Puli Filozofski fakultet MIŠEL ŠANTL Bitka za Britaniju (1939. - 1940.) Završni rad JMBAG: 0303042186, redoviti student Studijski smjer: Preddiplomski studij povijesti Predmet: Uvod u suvremenu povijest Znanstveno područje: humanističke znanosti Znanstveno polje: povijest Znanstvena grana: hrvatska i svjetska moderna i suvremena povijest Mentor: doc. dr. sc. Igor Duda Sumentorica: dr. sc. Iva Milovan Delić, v. asist. Pula, rujan, 2016. IZJAVA O AKADEMSKOJ ČESTITOSTI Ja, dolje potpisani Mišel Šantl, kandidat za prvostupnika povijesti ovime izjavljujem da je ovaj Završni rad rezultat isključivo mojega vlastitog rada, da se temelji na mojim istraživanjima te da se oslanja na objavljenu literaturu kao što to pokazuju korištene bilješke i bibliografija. Izjavljujem da niti jedan dio Završnog rada nije napisan na nedozvoljen način, odnosno da je prepisan iz kojega necitiranog rada, te da ikoji dio rada krši bilo čija autorska prava. Izjavljujem, takoĎer, da nijedan dio rada nije iskorišten za koji drugi rad pri bilo kojoj drugoj visokoškolskoj, znanstvenoj ili radnoj ustanovi. Student: ______________________ U Puli, 19. rujna 2016. godine IZJAVA o korištenju autorskog djela Ja, Mišel Šantl dajem odobrenje Sveučilištu Jurja Dobrile u Puli, kao nositelju prava iskorištavanja, da moj završni rad pod nazivom Bitka za Britaniju (1939. – 1940.) koristi na način da gore navedeno autorsko djelo, kao cjeloviti tekst trajno objavi u javnoj internetskoj bazi Sveučilišne knjižnice Sveučilišta Jurja Dobrile u Puli te kopira u javnu internetsku bazu završnih radova Nacionalne i sveučilišne knjižnice (stavljanje na raspolaganje javnosti), sve u skladu s Zakonom o autorskom pravu i drugim srodnim pravima i dobrom akademskom praksom, a radi promicanja otvorenoga, slobodnoga pristupa znanstvenim informacijama.
    [Show full text]
  • Discovering Charles Rennie Mackintosh
    Discovering Charles Rennie Mackintosh Travel This tour starts and finishes at the Hilton Grosvenor Hotel, Glasgow. 1-9 Grosvenor Terrace, Glasgow, G12 0TA Tel: 0141 339 8811 E-mail: [email protected] Please note that transport to the hotel is not included in the price of the tour. Transport If you are travelling by car: The Hilton Glasgow Grosvenor is located 5 minutes from the M8 motorway and 5 minutes’ walk from Hillhead subway station. The hotel is situated on the corner of the junction between Byres Road and Great Western Road. On arrival, directly after the hotel turn right, into the lane between the Hilton and Waitrose. Stop at the hotel entrance and get a car park ticket from reception. Finally, drive up the ramp of the Waitrose car park on the left, and keep on going until the top level, which is reserved for hotel guests and the residents of the adjoining flats. Parking is £10 per day, payable locally. If you are travelling by train: The nearest subway stop is Hillhead, which is about a 5 minute walk away on Byres Road. Glasgow Central Station is about 15 minutes by taxi to the hotel. Accommodation The Hilton Grosvenor Hotel The Hilton Grosvenor Hotel is a traditional four-star hotel in the vibrant West End area of the city centre. It is ideally situated in close proximity to the array of locations visited during your tour including the Hunterian Gallery and University. Bedrooms are equipped with all necessities to ensure a relaxing and enjoyable visit, including an en-suite bathroom with bath/shower, TV, telephone, Wi-Fi, hairdryer and complimentary tea/coffee making facilities.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 7, Issue 2, July 2021 Introduction: New Researchers and the Bright Future of Military History
    www.bjmh.org.uk British Journal for Military History Volume 7, Issue 2, July 2021 Cover picture: Royal Navy destroyers visiting Derry, Northern Ireland, 11 June 1933. Photo © Imperial War Museum, HU 111339 www.bjmh.org.uk BRITISH JOURNAL FOR MILITARY HISTORY EDITORIAL ADVISORY BOARD The Editorial Team gratefully acknowledges the support of the British Journal for Military History’s Editorial Advisory Board the membership of which is as follows: Chair: Prof Alexander Watson (Goldsmiths, University of London, UK) Dr Laura Aguiar (Public Record Office of Northern Ireland / Nerve Centre, UK) Dr Andrew Ayton (Keele University, UK) Prof Tarak Barkawi (London School of Economics, UK) Prof Ian Beckett (University of Kent, UK) Dr Huw Bennett (University of Cardiff, UK) Prof Martyn Bennett (Nottingham Trent University, UK) Dr Matthew Bennett (University of Winchester, UK) Prof Brian Bond (King’s College London, UK) Dr Timothy Bowman (University of Kent, UK; Member BCMH, UK) Ian Brewer (Treasurer, BCMH, UK) Dr Ambrogio Caiani (University of Kent, UK) Prof Antoine Capet (University of Rouen, France) Dr Erica Charters (University of Oxford, UK) Sqn Ldr (Ret) Rana TS Chhina (United Service Institution of India, India) Dr Gemma Clark (University of Exeter, UK) Dr Marie Coleman (Queens University Belfast, UK) Prof Mark Connelly (University of Kent, UK) Seb Cox (Air Historical Branch, UK) Dr Selena Daly (Royal Holloway, University of London, UK) Dr Susan Edgington (Queen Mary University of London, UK) Prof Catharine Edwards (Birkbeck, University of London,
    [Show full text]
  • The Night Operation on the Passchendaele Ridge, 2Nd December 1917
    Centre for First World War Studies A Moonlight Massacre: The Night Operation on the Passchendaele Ridge, 2nd December 1917 by Michael Stephen LoCicero Thesis submitted to The University of Birmingham for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY School of History and Cultures College of Arts & Law June 2011 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. Abstract The Third Battle of Ypres was officially terminated by Field Marshal Sir Douglas Haig with the opening of the Battle of Cambrai on 20 November 1917. Nevertheless, a comparatively unknown set-piece attack – the only large-scale night operation carried out on the Flanders front during the campaign – was launched twelve days later on 2 December. This thesis, a necessary corrective to published campaign narratives of what has become popularly known as „Passchendaele‟, examines the course of events from the mid-November decision to sanction further offensive activity in the vicinity of Passchendaele village to the barren operational outcome that forced British GHQ to halt the attack within ten hours of Zero. A litany of unfortunate decisions and circumstances contributed to the profitless result.
    [Show full text]
  • Role of the Archives in the Future
    … You can fool all the people some of the time, and some of the people all the time, but you cannot fool all the people all the time…” Abraham Lincoln ( 1809 – 1865 ) FACTS AND FICTION- ARCHIVAL FOOTAGE HISTORICAL EVENTS AND TELEVISION AND FILM PRODUCTIONS Media Archeology Movies and television productions are released and transmitted each year dealing with historical events or public personalities like politicians , military leaders, revolutionaries, and people with a record of special achievemments. The aim of my presentation is to make you aware of different possibilities in reusing archival footage in movies. It is my intention to inform you about the importance of the audiovisual archives and how to reuse transmitted programmes or real shots of life in new productions. It is not my intention to evaluate real shots in historical movies and to report about facts and fiction in those films. The subject is dealt with in the book called: PAST IMPERFECT. History According to the Movies. 1995, and my own paper on the same subject: HISTORY AND MOVIES: An evaluation of the information of historical events, of international known personalities and of famous sites and buildings describes in movies. External links: ( Contact: http://www.baacouncil.org/ or [email protected] for copy of the paper) Television companies should be proud of their collections of transmitted programmes. Because I have worked for televison archive for about 29 years I have viewed a lot of television programmes and movies. Some years ago I started to question the reuse of transmitted television programmes and also the active reuse of news in new productions.
    [Show full text]
  • The Representation of Reality and Fantasy in the Films of Powell and Pressburger: 1939-1946
    The Representation of Reality and Fantasy In the Films of Powell and Pressburger 1939-1946 Valerie Wilson University College London PhD May 2001 ProQuest Number: U642581 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. uest. ProQuest U642581 Published by ProQuest LLC(2015). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 The Representation of Reality and Fantasy In the Films of Powell and Pressburger: 1939-1946 This thesis will examine the films planned or made by Powell and Pressburger in this period, with these aims: to demonstrate the way the contemporary realities of wartime Britain (political, social, cultural, economic) are represented in these films, and how the realities of British history (together with information supplied by the Ministry of Information and other government ministries) form the basis of much of their propaganda. to chart the changes in the stylistic combination of realism, naturalism, expressionism and surrealism, to show that all of these films are neither purely realist nor seamless products of artifice but carefully constructed narratives which use fantasy genres (spy stories, rural myths, futuristic utopias, dreams and hallucinations) to convey their message.
    [Show full text]
  • Reginald Victor Jones CH FRS (1911-1997)
    Catalogue of the papers and correspondence of Reginald Victor Jones CH FRS (1911-1997) by Alan Hayward NCUACS catalogue no. 95/8/00 R.V. Jones 1 NCUACS 95/8/00 Title: Catalogue of the papers and correspondence of Reginald Victor Jones CH FRS (1911-1997), physicist Compiled by: Alan Hayward Description level: Fonds Date of material: 1928-1998 Extent of material: 230 boxes, ca 5000 items Deposited in: Churchill Archives Centre, Churchill College, Cambridge CB3 0DS Reference code: GB 0014 2000 National Cataloguing Unit for the Archives of Contemporary Scientists, University of Bath. NCUACS catalogue no. 95/8/00 R.V. Jones 2 NCUACS 95/8/00 The work of the National Cataloguing Unit for the Archives of Contemporary Scientists, and the production of this catalogue, are made possible by the support of the Research Support Libraries Programme. R.V. Jones 3 NCUACS 95/8/00 NOT ALL THE MATERIAL IN THIS COLLECTION MAY YET BE AVAILABLE FOR CONSULTATION. ENQUIRIES SHOULD BE ADDRESSED IN THE FIRST INSTANCE TO: THE KEEPER OF THE ARCHIVES CHURCHILL ARCHIVES CENTRE CHURCHILL COLLEGE CAMBRIDGE R.V. Jones 4 NCUACS 95/8/00 LIST OF CONTENTS Items Page GENERAL INTRODUCTION 6 SECTION A BIOGRAPHICAL A.1 - A.302 12 SECTION B SECOND WORLD WAR B.1 - B.613 36 SECTION C UNIVERSITY OF ABERDEEN C.1 - C.282 95 SECTION D RESEARCH TOPICS AND SCIENCE INTERESTS D.1 - D.456 127 SECTION E DEFENCE AND INTELLIGENCE E.1 - E.256 180 SECTION F SCIENCE-RELATED INTERESTS F.1 - F.275 203 SECTION G VISITS AND CONFERENCES G.1 - G.448 238 SECTION H SOCIETIES AND ORGANISATIONS H.1 - H.922 284 SECTION J PUBLICATIONS J.1 - J.824 383 SECTION K LECTURES, SPEECHES AND BROADCASTS K.1 - K.495 450 SECTION L CORRESPONDENCE L.1 - L.140 495 R.V.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution of British Tactical and Operational Tank Doctrine and Training in the First World War
    The evolution of British tactical and operational tank doctrine and training in the First World War PHILIP RICHARD VENTHAM TD BA (Hons.) MA. Thesis submitted for the award of the degree of Master of Philosophy by the University of Wolverhampton October 2016 ©Copyright P R Ventham 1 ABSTRACT Tanks were first used in action in September 1916. There had been no previous combat experience on which to base tactical and operational doctrine for the employment of this novel weapon of war. Training of crews and commanders was hampered by lack of vehicles and weapons. Time was short in which to train novice crews. Training facilities were limited. Despite mechanical limitations of the early machines and their vulnerability to adverse ground conditions, the tanks achieved moderate success in their initial actions. Advocates of the tanks, such as Fuller and Elles, worked hard to convince the sceptical of the value of the tank. Two years later, tanks had gained the support of most senior commanders. Doctrine, based on practical combat experience, had evolved both within the Tank Corps and at GHQ and higher command. Despite dramatic improvements in the design, functionality and reliability of the later marks of heavy and medium tanks, they still remained slow and vulnerable to ground conditions and enemy counter-measures. Competing demands for materiel meant there were never enough tanks to replace casualties and meet the demands of formation commanders. This thesis will argue that the somewhat patchy performance of the armoured vehicles in the final months of the war was less a product of poor doctrinal guidance and inadequate training than of an insufficiency of tanks and the difficulties of providing enough tanks in the right locations at the right time to meet the requirements of the manoeuvre battles of the ‘Hundred Days’.
    [Show full text]
  • The Magazine of RAF 100 Group Association
    . The magazine of RAF 100 Group Association RAF 100 Group Association Chairman Roger Dobson: Tel: 01407 710384 RAF 100 Group Association Secretary Janine Bradley: Tel: 01723 512544 Email: [email protected] www.raf100groupassociation.org.uk Home to RAF 100 Group Association Memorabilia City of Norwich Aviation Museum Old Norwich Road, Horsham St Faith, Norwich, Norfolk NR10 3JF Telephone: 01603 893080 www.cnam.org.uk 2 Dearest Friends My heartfelt thanks to the kind and generous member who sent a gorgeous bouquet of flowers on one of my darkest days. Thank you so much! The card with them simply said: ‘ RAF 100 Group’ , and with the wealth of letters and cards which continue to arrive since the last magazine, I feel your love reaching across the miles. Thank you everyone for your support and encouragement during this difficult time. It has now passed the three month marker since reading that shocking email sent by Tony telling me he wasn’t coming home from London … ever ! I now know he has been leading a double life, and his relationship with another stretches back into the past. I have no idea what is truth and what is lies any more. To make it worse, they met up here in the north! There are times when I feel my heart can’t take any more … yet somehow, something happens to tell me I am still needed. My world has shrunk since I don’t have a car any more. Travel is restricted. But right here in Filey I now attend a Monday Lunch Club for my one hot meal of the week.
    [Show full text]
  • Report on the Foreign Policy of the Czech Republic 2007
    CONTENTS INTRODUCTION......................................................................................................................6 I. MULTILATERAL COOPERATION ................................................................................. 14 1. The Czech Republic and the European Union ........................................................ 14 The Czech Republic and the EU Common Foreign and Security Policy ............. 33 The Czech Republic and European Security and Defence Policy ........................ 42 2. The Czech Republic and the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO) ............ 48 3. The Czech Republic and Regional Cooperation ..................................................... 74 Visegrad cooperation ............................................................................................. 74 Central European Initiative (CEI) .......................................................................... 78 Regional Partnership .............................................................................................. 80 Stability Pact for South East Europe ..................................................................... 82 4. The Czech Republic and other European international organisations and forums .. 84 The Czech Republic and the Organisation for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE)................................................................................................................... 84 Council of Europe .................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Battle of Britain Blood Red Skies
    Battle of Britain Blood Red Skies (BRS) Campaign The German “Blitzkrieg”, a new way of waging “lightning war” had raged through first Poland, then in the early summer of 1940 struck at Holland, Belgium and France. The Luftwaffe (German air force) crushed all opponents in the air, and then fast moving armour with ever present air support sliced through ground forces leaving their opponents scrabbling to hold defensive positions that were already untenable. The British Expeditionary Force fell back to Dunkirk and was evacuated against the odds. During this period the RAF (Royal Air Force) had desperately tried to defend the Dunkirk beaches and the constant stream of ships large and small ferrying the remains of the BEF back home. When the last ships left over 338000 men had been evacuated, British and French, but they were exhausted and had abandoned all their weapons and heavy equipment on French roads and beaches. As Churchill said “What General Weygand has called the Battle of France is over ... the Battle of Britain is about to begin” The Battle of Britain was fought in the skies above England in the summer of 1940. The Luftwaffe were seeking to destroy the RAF to clear the way for a cross Chanel assault by the German Army. If they could succeed, Britain would be threatened with defeat and the war would be over. If the RAF could survive, then there may be time to prepare the defences, and possibly take the fight back to the enemy in due course. This campaign is designed to allow players to recreate some of the desperate battles fought in the summer of 1940 using the Blood Red Skies (BRS) rules from Warlord Games.
    [Show full text]
  • Exeter Blitz for Adobe
    Devon Libraries Exeter Blitz Factsheet 17 On the night of 3 rd - 4 th of May 1942, Exeter suffered its most destructive air raid of the Second World War. 160 high explosive bombs and 10,000 incendiary devices were dropped on the city. The damage inflicted changed the face of the city centre forever. Exeter suffered nineteen air raids between August 1940 and May 1942. The first was on the night of 7 th – 8 th of August 1940, when a single German bomber dropped five high explosive bombs on St. Thomas. Luckily no one was hurt and the damage was slight. The first fatalities were believed to have been in a raid on 17 th September 1940, when a house in Blackboy Road was destroyed, killing four boys. In most of the early raids it is likely that the city was not the intended target. The Luftwaffe flew over Exeter on its way towards the industrial cities to the north. It is possible that these earlier attacks on Exeter were caused by German bombers jettisoning unused bombs on the city when returning from raiding these industrial targets. It was not until the raids of 1942 that Exeter was to become the intended target. The town of Lubeck is a port on the Baltic; it had fine medieval architecture reflecting its wealth and importance. Although it was used to supply the German army and had munitions factories on the outskirts of the town, it was strategically unimportant. The bombing of this town on the night of 28 th – 29 th March on the orders of Bomber Command is said to be the reason why revenge attacks were carried out on ‘some of the most beautiful towns in England’.
    [Show full text]