Shape of Boulders Ejected from Small Lunar Impact Craters

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Shape of Boulders Ejected from Small Lunar Impact Craters Planetary and Space Science 145 (2017) 71–77 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Planetary and Space Science journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/pss Shape of boulders ejected from small lunar impact craters Yuan Li a,*, A.T. Basilevsky b, Minggang Xie a, Wing-Huen Ip a,c a Space Science Institute, Macau University of Science and Technology, Macau b Vernadsky Institute of Geochemistry and Analytical Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow 119991, Russia c Institute of Astronomy, National Central University, 32054 Chung-Li, Taiwan ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: The shape of ejecta boulders from 7 lunar impact craters <1 km in diameter of known absolute age was measured Moon to explore whether it correlates with the crater age and the boulder size. The boulders were mapped and then Shape of boulders measured by rectangular fitting and the shape was represented by the axial ratio or aspect ratio (A) of the Axial ratio rectangle. The main conclusions from the analysis of our measurement results are: 1) the percentages of the Crater age number of boulders of studied craters decrease with the increase of the axial ratio. Most (~90%) of the boulders have the axial ratio in the range of 1–2; no boulder with axial ratio larger than 4 was found. 2) the axial ratios of mare ejecta boulders decrease with their exposure time, whereas that for highland ones show unchanged trend. This difference may be probably due to target properties. 3) The shape of ejecta boulders are influenced by mechanical strength of bedrocks and space erosion. 4) surface peak stresses caused by thermal fatigue maybe play a significant erosion role in the shape of boulders of various diameter. 1. Introduction micrometeoroid and meteoroid bombardment and thermal stresses due to diurnal temperature changes (e.g., Clark et al., 2002). Solar wind, Impact craters and rocks/boulders are the predominant features on cosmic ray and electromagnetic radiation change the optical properties the lunar surface. In most cases, rocks appear on the lunar surface as a of the exposed materials within the rather thin surface layer. Microme- result of ejections from impact craters and come from the regolith layer teoroid bombardment was found to work mostly in the form of and bedrock basement underlying the regolith. The bedrocks in lunar sand-blasting without destroying the rocks (Horz€ et al., 1975, 1977; maria are composed of various basalts. In highlands these are impact McDonnell, 1977). Only meteoroid bombardment and thermal stresses breccias, which can be essentially fragmental breccias or contain are considered as the major factors for the destruction of boulders on the different contents of solidified shock melt (e.g., Florensky et al., 1981; airless body surface (see e.g., Basilevsky et al., 2013, 2015; Cintala and Heiken et al., 1991). Accordingly, lunar rocks/boulders studied by us are Horz,€ 2008; Delbo et al., 2014; Horz€ et al., 1975; Molaro et al., 2016). fragments of basalts or impact breccias. It should be noted that catastrophic rupture of exposed rocks on the The shape of ejecta boulders may provide an insight into the impact airless body by meteoroid bombardment has a stochastic character with fragmentation process (e.g., Melosh, 1989; Senthil Kumar et al., 2014). some boulders destroyed very soon after their appearance on the surface Krishna and Kumar (2016) described shapes of boulders by rectangular while some other that may stay untouched for very long time (e.g., Horz€ fitting, and defined the axial ratio (or aspect ratio) between long and et al., 1975). Meanwhile the destruction process by thermal stress should short axes of rectangular as a measure of the boulder shape. They sug- be more uniform in time if given the same mass and similar gested that the axial ratio (or aspect ratio) of boulders depends on ejec- thermo-mechanical properties, as all sun-illuminated rocks are univer- tion velocity, and an increase in the ejection velocity leads to a decrease sally subjected to the same process. of the axial ratio for boulders. In the following, the axial ratio or aspect Generally, the larger rocks demand the higher impact energy to be ratio will be abbreviated as A. destroyed, thus the longer survival time could be expected for them (e.g., After their formation, boulders exposed on the airless body surface Horz€ et al., 1975). However the larger rocks are mechanically weaker due are affected by a number of agents: solar wind ion implantation and to the increased number and size of intrinsic flaws (Housen and Hol- sputtering, cosmic-ray bombardment, electromagnetic radiation, sapple, 1999). Moreover, the larger rock has the higher probability to be * Corresponding author. E-mail address: [email protected] (Y. Li). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pss.2017.07.014 Received 8 June 2017; Accepted 21 July 2017 Available online 26 July 2017 0032-0633/© 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Y. Li et al. Planetary and Space Science 145 (2017) 71–77 Table 1 The list of location, terrain type, size and absolute age of the craters studied in this work. Crater Location Terrain Crater Crater Age name (Lat., Lon.) type size age determination (m) (Ma) technique and references South Ray À9.15,15.38 Highland 680 ~2 Radiometric (1,2) Unnamed 12.25, 62.24 Mare 200 5–10 Morphologic (3) A Unnamed À3.61,336.51 Mare 400 20–30 Morphologic (4) B Cone À3.63,342.57 Highland 340 ~26 Radiometric (5) North Ray À8.80,15.49 Highland 950 ~50 Radiometric (1,6) Unnamed À3.02,336.58 Mare 560 70 ± 30 Morphologic (7) D Camelot 20.21,30.73 Mare 650 ~100 Radiometric (7) (1) - Arvidson et al. (1975), (2) - Eugster (1999), (3) - Basilevsky and Head (2012), (4) - Basilevsky (1976), (5) - Turner et al. (1971), (6) - Borchardt et al. (1986), (7) - Li et al. (2017), (8) - Kirsten et al. (1973). Fig. 1. This image gives an illustration for the nominal diameter and A of identified boulders which located at the part of study area of North Ray crater. The boulder Table 2 encompassed by rectangle with width of ~5 m and length of ~6.5 m, has A of 1.3 and The basic information on images selected for the boulder counting for each of study craters. nominal diameter of ~5.7 m. Crater Image Id Pixel scale Local solar time Incidence name (m/pixel) (24-h clock) angle boulders with exposure time on the lunar surface. (degree) South Ray M119754107RE 0.45 15.70 56.15 2. Previous studies on the rock/boulder shape Unnamed M119449091RE 0.48 15.97 60.22 A The observed rocks can be represented as cuboid-shaped objects Unnamed M120005333LE 0.48 15.46 52.09 having three mutually perpendicular axes: the long axis a, medium axis b, B M144775952RE 0.44 8.64 50.39 Cone M168319885RE 0.29 14.49 37.40 and short axis c. It is obvious that in most cases a rock ejected to the lunar M175388134LE 0.28 9.01 44.87 surface should lie with its short axis upward. So, when we observe rocks Unnamed M142495666RE 0.51 10.45 44.88 from above, as in the case of the present study, most probably we see the C M166072850LE 0.49 16.14 69.03 long a and medium b dimensions of it (e.g., Demidov and Basilev- North Ray M144524996LE 0.45 8.88 47.18 Borya M127159138LE 0.40 9.95 46.42 sky, 2014). M135418902RE 0.51 15.81 65.29 Fujiwara et al. (1978) reported an impact experiment in which ~5 cm Unnamed M104662862LE 1.09 15.29 49.37 basalt blocks were shot with polycarbonate cylinders 0.8 cm in diameter D M1121393925E 0.98 9.13 43.13 with masses of 0.37 g at a velocity of 1–4 km/s. Statistical processing of Camelot M134991788LE 0.48 16.17 64.60 the geometry of the fragments yielded average values of b/a ¼ 0.73, and M162107606LE 0.43 7.14 73.85 ¼ Spook M144524996LE 0.45 8.89 47.18 c/a 0.5. Capaccioni et al. (1984) used a 1 g aluminum projectile shot at a velocity of ~10 km/s at triaxial ellipsoids with dimensions 30 Â 21 Â 15 cm and composed of specific concrete and obtained values impacted due to their larger area. The interplay of these factors are not of b/a ¼ 0.72 and c/a ¼ 0.49 which are similar to the result of Fujiwara well understood by now. Therefore, the issue of how meteoroid impacts et al. (1978). If to consider the a/b ratio (A), these experiments showed affect the survival times of boulders of various sizes demands addi- the average value to be ~1.4. tional studies. Demidov and Basilevsky (2014), as part of their study, measured 40 By modeling boulder/rock response to diurnal thermal forcing, relatively large boulders in six rocky areas of lunar surface using Lunar Molaro et al. (2017) concluded that lunar exposed boulders have weak Reconnaissance Orbiter Camera (LROC) Narrow Angle Camera (NAC) outer layer that is susceptible to surface disaggregation, so this disag- images and found that b/a ratio is 0.78 for highland rocks with a standard gregation should be the primary mechanism for thermal breakdown, deviation of 0.16 and 0.83 for mare rocks with a standard deviation of while the formation of large cracks that splits a boulder would 0.18. The Welch test showed that the distributions of the b/a parameters be secondary.
Recommended publications
  • Terrestrial Impact Structures Provide the Only Ground Truth Against Which Computational and Experimental Results Can Be Com­ Pared
    Ann. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 1987. 15:245-70 Copyright([;; /987 by Annual Reviews Inc. All rights reserved TERRESTRIAL IMI!ACT STRUCTURES ··- Richard A. F. Grieve Geophysics Division, Geological Survey of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario KIA OY3, Canada INTRODUCTION Impact structures are the dominant landform on planets that have retained portions of their earliest crust. The present surface of the Earth, however, has comparatively few recognized impact structures. This is due to its relative youthfulness and the dynamic nature of the terrestrial geosphere, both of which serve to obscure and remove the impact record. Although not generally viewed as an important terrestrial (as opposed to planetary) geologic process, the role of impact in Earth evolution is now receiving mounting consideration. For example, large-scale impact events may hav~~ been responsible for such phenomena as the formation of the Earth's moon and certain mass extinctions in the biologic record. The importance of the terrestrial impact record is greater than the relatively small number of known structures would indicate. Impact is a highly transient, high-energy event. It is inherently difficult to study through experimentation because of the problem of scale. In addition, sophisticated finite-element code calculations of impact cratering are gen­ erally limited to relatively early-time phenomena as a result of high com­ putational costs. Terrestrial impact structures provide the only ground truth against which computational and experimental results can be com­ pared. These structures provide information on aspects of the third dimen­ sion, the pre- and postimpact distribution of target lithologies, and the nature of the lithologic and mineralogic changes produced by the passage of a shock wave.
    [Show full text]
  • Impact Crater Collapse
    P1: SKH/tah P2: KKK/mbg QC: KKK/arun T1: KKK March 12, 1999 17:54 Annual Reviews AR081-12 Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 1999. 27:385–415 Copyright c 1999 by Annual Reviews. All rights reserved IMPACT CRATER COLLAPSE H. J. Melosh Lunar and Planetary Laboratory, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721; e-mail: [email protected] B. A. Ivanov Institute for Dynamics of the Geospheres, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia 117979 KEY WORDS: crater morphology, dynamical weakening, acoustic fluidization, transient crater, central peaks ABSTRACT The detailed morphology of impact craters is now believed to be mainly caused by the collapse of a geometrically simple, bowl-shaped “transient crater.” The transient crater forms immediately after the impact. In small craters, those less than approximately 15 km diameter on the Moon, the steepest part of the rim collapses into the crater bowl to produce a lens of broken rock in an otherwise unmodified transient crater. Such craters are called “simple” and have a depth- to-diameter ratio near 1:5. Large craters collapse more spectacularly, giving rise to central peaks, wall terraces, and internal rings in still larger craters. These are called “complex” craters. The transition between simple and complex craters depends on 1/g, suggesting that the collapse occurs when a strength threshold is exceeded. The apparent strength, however, is very low: only a few bars, and with little or no internal friction. This behavior requires a mechanism for tem- porary strength degradation in the rocks surrounding the impact site. Several models for this process, including acoustic fluidization and shock weakening, have been considered by recent investigations.
    [Show full text]
  • Adams Adkinson Aeschlimann Aisslinger Akkermann
    BUSCAPRONTA www.buscapronta.com ARQUIVO 27 DE PESQUISAS GENEALÓGICAS 189 PÁGINAS – MÉDIA DE 60.800 SOBRENOMES/OCORRÊNCIA Para pesquisar, utilize a ferramenta EDITAR/LOCALIZAR do WORD. A cada vez que você clicar ENTER e aparecer o sobrenome pesquisado GRIFADO (FUNDO PRETO) corresponderá um endereço Internet correspondente que foi pesquisado por nossa equipe. Ao solicitar seus endereços de acesso Internet, informe o SOBRENOME PESQUISADO, o número do ARQUIVO BUSCAPRONTA DIV ou BUSCAPRONTA GEN correspondente e o número de vezes em que encontrou o SOBRENOME PESQUISADO. Número eventualmente existente à direita do sobrenome (e na mesma linha) indica número de pessoas com aquele sobrenome cujas informações genealógicas são apresentadas. O valor de cada endereço Internet solicitado está em nosso site www.buscapronta.com . Para dados especificamente de registros gerais pesquise nos arquivos BUSCAPRONTA DIV. ATENÇÃO: Quando pesquisar em nossos arquivos, ao digitar o sobrenome procurado, faça- o, sempre que julgar necessário, COM E SEM os acentos agudo, grave, circunflexo, crase, til e trema. Sobrenomes com (ç) cedilha, digite também somente com (c) ou com dois esses (ss). Sobrenomes com dois esses (ss), digite com somente um esse (s) e com (ç). (ZZ) digite, também (Z) e vice-versa. (LL) digite, também (L) e vice-versa. Van Wolfgang – pesquise Wolfgang (faça o mesmo com outros complementos: Van der, De la etc) Sobrenomes compostos ( Mendes Caldeira) pesquise separadamente: MENDES e depois CALDEIRA. Tendo dificuldade com caracter Ø HAMMERSHØY – pesquise HAMMERSH HØJBJERG – pesquise JBJERG BUSCAPRONTA não reproduz dados genealógicos das pessoas, sendo necessário acessar os documentos Internet correspondentes para obter tais dados e informações. DESEJAMOS PLENO SUCESSO EM SUA PESQUISA.
    [Show full text]
  • Observations at Terrestrial Impact Structures: Their Utility in Constraining Crater Formation
    Meteoritics & Planetary Science 39, Nr 2, 199–216 (2004) Abstract available online at http://meteoritics.org Observations at terrestrial impact structures: Their utility in constraining crater formation Richard A. F. GRIEVE* and Ann M. THERRIAULT Earth Sciences Sector, Natural Resources Canada, 588 Booth Street, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0Y7, Canada *Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] (Received 22 July 2003; revision accepted 15 December 2003) Abstract–Hypervelocity impact involves the near instantaneous transfer of considerable energy from the impactor to a spatially limited near-surface volume of the target body. Local geology of the target area tends to be of secondary importance, and the net result is that impacts of similar size on a given planetary body produce similar results. This is the essence of the utility of observations at impact craters, particularly terrestrial craters, in constraining impact processes. Unfortunately, there are few well-documented results from systematic contemporaneous campaigns to characterize specific terrestrial impact structures with the full spectrum of geoscientific tools available at the time. Nevertheless, observations of the terrestrial impact record have contributed substantially to fundamental properties of impact. There is a beginning of convergence and mutual testing of observations at terrestrial impact structures and the results of modeling, in particular from recent hydrocode models. The terrestrial impact record provides few constraints on models of ejecta processes beyond a confirmation of the involvement of the local substrate in ejecta lithologies and shows that Z-models are, at best, first order approximations. Observational evidence to date suggests that the formation of interior rings is an extension of the structural uplift process that occurs at smaller complex impact structures.
    [Show full text]
  • REFERENCES LUNAR SAMPLE COMPENDIUM (July 2012)
    REFERENCES LUNAR SAMPLE COMPENDIUM (July 2012) Note: The abstract volumes of the annual Lunar Science and Lunar and Planetary Science Conferences were issued by the Lunar and Planetary Science Institute, Houston.. Initially, the Proceedings of these annual conferences were supplements to Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta (volumes 1-12), later J. Geophys. Res.(volumes 13-17). Proceedings 18-22 were produced and published by the Lunar Planetary Science Institute. There is an index to the first nine Lunar Science Conferences (Masterson 1979). Proceedings papers were peer-reviewed, while abstracts were not. Abell P.I., Cadogen P.H., Eglington G., Maxwell J.R. and Pillinger C.T. (1971) Survey of lunar carbon compounds. Proc. Second Lunar Sci. Conf. 1843-1863. Abu-Eid R.M., Vaughan D.J., Whitner M., Burns R.G. and Morawski A. (1973) Spectral data bearing on the oxidation states of Fe, Ti, and Cr in Apollo 15 and Apollo 16 samples (abs). Lunar Sci. IV, 1-3. Lunar Planetary Institute, Houston. Adams J.B. and McCord T.B. (1970) Remote sensing of lunar surface mineralogy: Implications from visible and near-infrared reflectivity of Apollo 11 samples. Proc. Apollo 11 Lunar Sci. Conf. 1937-1946. Adams J.B. and McCord T.B. (1971) Optical properties of mineral separates, glass and anorthosite fragments from Apollo mare samples. Proc. Second Lunar Sci. Conf. 2183-2195. Adams J.B. and McCord T.B. (1972) Optical evidence for average pyroxene composition of Apollo 15 samples. In The Apollo 15 Lunar Samples, 10-13. Lunar Planetary Institute, Houston. Adams J.B. and McCord T.B.
    [Show full text]
  • Nasa Technical Memorandum Tm-88427 Formation of The
    NASA TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM TM-88427 FORMATION OF THE CENTRAL UPLIFT IN METEORIC CRATERS Jvanov, B.A.; Bazilevskiy, A.T.; Sazonova, L.V. Translation of "Ob obrazovanii tsentralnogo podnyatiya v meteoritnykh kraterakh," in "Meteoritika, Akademiya nauk SSSR" No. 40, 1982, pp. 67-81 , f(NASA-TM-88427) FORMATION OF THE CENTBAL N86-25913 DfLIFT IN flETIOEIC CEATEBS {Hatioiial Aeronautics and Space administration) 33 p HC A03/MP A01 CSCX 08G Unclas G3/46 43587 NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20546 MAY, 1986 FORMATION OF THE CENTRAL UPLIFT IN METEORIC CRATERS V.A. Ivanov INTRODUCTION. /671 Central peaks or central uplifts in meteoric craters are a necessary element in the structure of craters in a certain size range, e.g. craters with a diameter of 25-200 km on the Moon and 4-70 (?) km on Earth. Smaller craters have a simple cup shape; larger craters are complex multiringed structures. The transition from simple cup-shaped craters to craters with central uplifts is associated with a decrease in relative crater depth, which brings into question the depth of excavation during formation of craters with complex structure. A change in crater structure indicates a change in the mechanics of crater formation and requires caution when one attempts to extrapolate to natural occurrences the set of data accumulated during study of this process using experimental explosions and hypervelocity impacts under laboratory conditions. The purpose of this article is to discuss and, if possible, evaluate the relationship of various processes which accompany crater formation; to attempt to identify those which can be related to the natural appearance of central uplifts in impact craters on a certain scale.
    [Show full text]
  • Geochemistry of Darwin Impact Glass and Target Rocks
    vol. 54, w. 1463-1474 001~703?/901$3.W + .m pk. Printedin U.S.A. Geochemistry of Darwin impact glass and target rocks THOMAS MEISEI,,‘,* CHRISTIANKOEBERL, ‘*‘*+ and R. J. FORD”* ‘Institute of Geochemistry, University of Vienna, Dr.-Karl-Lueger-Ring I, A- 1010 Vienna, Austria *Lunar and Planetary Institute, 3303 NASA Road 1, Houston, TX 77058, USA 3Department of Geology, Unive&y of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania 7001, Australia (Received September 26, 1989;accepted in r~~sed~r~ February 15, 1990) Abstract-We have analyzed the major and trace element composition of 18 Darwin glass samples and 7 target rocks (sandstones, shales, and a quiz) from the Darwin crater area. On the basis of our data, and using statistical methods, 3 chemically distinct groups of Darwin glass were identified: A (low Fe, Al = LFe,Al, or average K&win glass group), B (HFe,Al group), and C (HMg,Na group). The glasses of group C also show anomalous enrichments of several elements, e.g., Cr, Mn, Co, and Ni. Electron microprobe studies show that the glasses are inhomogeneous on the micrometer scale, which is typical for impact glasses. The geochemistry of all &sses is very similar to terrestrial sediments and thus supports the impact origin model. We have performed mixing calculations which show that in general Darwin gIass can be formed by melting and mixing local target rocks. The best fit is obtained for a mixture of 30% quart&e, 60% shale BIDG, and IO% shale Bl-DG. Some major element contents do not agree exactly, which is most probably due to the limited selection of target rocks that were available for our study.
    [Show full text]
  • Lunar Sourcebook : a User's Guide to the Moon
    REFERENCES Adams J. B. (1974) Visible and near-infrared diffuse chemistry, mineralogy and petrology of some Apollo 11 reflectance spectra of pyroxenes as applied to remote lunar samples. Proc. Apollo 11 Lunar Sci. Conf., pp. 93–128. sensing of solid objects in the solar system. J. Geophys. Ahrens T. J. and Cole D. M. (1974) Shock compression and Res., 79, 4829–4836. adiabatic release of lunar fines from Apollo 17. Proc. Lunar Adams J. B. (1975) Interpretation of visible and near-infrared Sci. Conf. 5th, pp. 2333–2345. diffuse reflectance spectra of pyroxenes and other rock Ahrens T. J. and O’Keefe J. D. (1977) Equations of state and forming minerals. In Infrared and Raman Spectroscopy of impact-induced shock-wave interaction on the Moon. In Lunar and Terrestrial Materials (C. Karr, ed.), pp. 91–116. Impact and Explosion Cratering (D. J. Roddy, R. O. Pepin, Academic, New York. and R. B. Merrill, eds.), pp. 639–656. Pergamon, New York. Adams J. B. and McCord T. B. (1973) Vitrification darkening Albee A. L. and Chodos A. A. (1970) Microprobe investigations in the lunar highlands and identification of Descartes on Apollo 11 samples. Proc. Apollo 11 Lunar Sci. Conf., pp. material at the Apollo 16 site. Proc. Lunar Sci. Conf. 4th, 135–157. pp. 163–177. Albee A. L., Chodos A. A., Gancarz A. J., Haines E. L., Adams J. B., Pieters C., and McCord T. B. (1974) Orange Papanastassiou D. A., Ray L., Tera F., Wasserburg G. J., glass: Evidence for regional deposits of pyroclastic origin and Wen T. (1972) Mineralogy, petrology, and chemistry of on the Moon.
    [Show full text]
  • New Views of Lunar Geoscience: an Introduction and Overview Harald Hiesinger and James W
    Reviews in Mineralogy & Geochemistry Vol. 60, pp. XXX-XXX, 2006 1 Copyright © Mineralogical Society of America New Views of Lunar Geoscience: An Introduction and Overview Harald Hiesinger and James W. Head III Department of Geological Sciences Brown University Box 1846 Providence, Rhode Island, 02912, U.S.A. [email protected] [email protected] 1.1. INTRODUCTION Beyond the Earth, the Moon is the only planetary body for which we have samples from known locations. The analysis of these samples gives us “ground-truth” for numerous remote sensing studies of the physical and chemical properties of the Moon and they are invaluable for our fundamental understanding of lunar origin and evolution. Prior to the return of the Apollo 11 samples, the Moon was thought by many to be a primitive undifferentiated body (e.g., Urey 1966), a concept shattered by the data returned from the Apollo and Luna missions. Ever since, new data have helped to address some of our questions, but of course, they also produced new questions. In this chapter we provide a summary of knowledge about lunar geologic processes and we describe major scienti! c advancements of the last decade that are mainly related to the most recent lunar missions such as Galileo, Clementine, and Lunar Prospector. 1.1.1. The Moon in the planetary context Compared to terrestrial planets, the Moon is unique in terms of its bulk density, its size, and its origin (Fig. 1.1a-c), all of which have profound effects on its thermal evolution and the formation of a secondary crust (Fig. 1.1d).
    [Show full text]
  • 19820003100.Pdf
    N O T I C E THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN REPRODUCED FROM MICROFICHE. ALTHOUGH IT IS RECOGNIZED THAT CERTAIN PORTIONS ARE ILLEGIBLE, IT IS BEING RELEASED IN THE INTEREST OF MAKING AVAILABLE AS MUCH INFORMATION AS POSSIBLE . I r1 (NASA 164U1J) PLANk'lAt,, . ADAth S'TUDiE.S 1uarteL:ly !'royr.55 ,SeEcct (i• lai,et U y Scieftc e Liiat. ) tlb p HC AO/:9E , t k:SCL Jju U ci c 1. i . Vs/'^ 1 -77 1 c PLANETARY SCIENCE INSTITUTE tli ^I ,I ,I QUARTERLY PROGRESS REPORT PLANETARY RADAR STUDIES NASW 3383 SAI 1-142-08-078-00 15 August 1981 T.W. Thompson (Principal Investigator) J.A. Cutts (Co-Investigator) Planetary Science Institute Science Applications, Inc. 283 South Lake Avenue, Suite 218 Pasadena, California 91101 (213) 449-4955 b INDEX PAGE INTRODUCTION. 1 TASK I: Radar Signatures of Lunar and Venus Craters . 2 TASK II: High Resolution Radar Mapping of the Moon . 4 SUMMARY. 7 P Table 1: Summary--Arecibo Lunar Radar Mapping - May 1981 . 8 Table 2: Arecibo Lunar Observation Opportunities, . 9 September - October 1981 Table 3: Arecibo Lunar Observation Opportunities, . 10 November - December 1981 Figure 1: Overview--Real Time Lunar Radar Observations 11 at the Arecibo Observatory Figure 2: Summary of May 1981 Observations . 12 Figures 3-14: Radar Mapping Geometries for May 1981 Observations. 13 Figure 15: Overview of Lunar Radar Data Processing . 25 Figure 16: Lunar Mapping Software . 26 Figure 17; Raw Radar Spectra - Theophilus . 27 Figure 18: Normalized Spectra - Theophilus . 28 APPENDIX A: Comparison of Radar Images of Craters on Venus . A-1 and the Moon: Evidence for a Steady-State Venus Crater Population, J.A.
    [Show full text]
  • (1846–1920). Russian Jeweller, of French Descent. He Achieved Fame
    Fabricius ab Aquapendente, Hieronymus (Geronimo Fabrizi) (1533–1619). Italian physician, born at Aquapendente, near Orvieto. He studied medicine under *Fallopio at Padua and succeeded F him as professor of surgery and anatomy 1562– 1613. He became actively involved in building Fabergé, Peter Carl (1846–1920). Russian jeweller, the university’s magnificent anatomical theatre, of French descent. He achieved fame by the ingenuity which is preserved today. He acquired fame as a and extravagance of the jewelled objects (especially practising physician and surgeon, and made extensive Easter eggs) he devised for the Russian nobility and contributions to many fields of physiology and the tsar in an age of ostentatious extravagance which medicine, through his energetic skills in dissection ended on the outbreak of World War I. He died in and experimentation. He wrote works on surgery, Switzerland. discussing treatments for different sorts of wounds, and a major series of embryological studies, illustrated Fabius, Laurent (1946– ). French socialist politician. by detailed engravings. His work on the formation of He was Deputy 1978–81, 1986– , Minister for the foetus was especially important for its discussion Industry and Research 1983–84, Premier of France of the provisions made by nature for the necessities 1984–86, Minister of Economics 2000–02 and of the foetus during its intra-uterine life. The medical Foreign Minister 2012–16, and President of the theory he offered to explain the development of eggs Constitutional Council 2016– . and foetuses, however, was in the tradition of *Galen. Fabricius is best remembered for his detailed studies Fabius Maximus Verrocosus Cunctator, Quintus of the valves of the veins.
    [Show full text]
  • 0 Lunar and Planetary Institute Provided by the NASA Astrophysics Data System EMPLACEMENT of FAHRENHEIT EJECTA
    MODE OF EMPLACEMENT OF FAHRENHEIT EJECTA AT THE LUNA 24 SITE. M. Settle, M. J. Cintala and J. W. Head, Dept. of Geological Sciences, Brown Uni- versity, Providence, RI 02912. The Luna 24 mission to the southeast portion of Mare Crisium returned a sample of lunar regolith material obtained by drilling onto the upper 2 m of the mare surface1. Reg01 ith stratigraphy is 1ocal ly determined by the amount of primary ejecta arriving at a site from surrounding craters (a function of crater size and range) and the style in which this material is ballistically emplaced. It is difficult to estimate regolith stratigraphy at a specific point on the Moon due to azimuthal variations in the distribution of primary ejectag , particularly within the zone of discontinuous ejecta deposition. Al- though the role of secondary cratering in producing distinctive textures with- in the ejecta deposits surrounding large, fresh lunar craters is widely recog- nized, secondary cratering also occurs during the ball istic deposition of pri- mary ejecta excavated by craters less than 10 km in diameter2. Isolated sec- ondary crater clusters, and chains produced by primary ejecta from small cra- ters (observed rim crest diameter, D, <10 km) may have a major influence upon local regolith stratigraphy. In particular, the crater Fahrenheit (D = 6.4 km) situated at a range of 18.4 km from the Luna 24 site has been considered to be a potentially important source of material at the site by previous in- vestigators' ' 3. A1 though Fahrenheit appears to be morphometrically unmodified (depth/di ameter = 0.23), the morphology of its exterior deposits is extensive- ly degraded: rays cannot be distinguished, the continuous ejecta deposit lacks crisp texturing, and the rim is pitted with subsequent craters.
    [Show full text]