Contents Page Distribution Sheet

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Contents Page Distribution Sheet Integrated fisheries, RHS and ecological data model for the river Lee Report to Environment Agency NE Thames Area P. M. Scarlett M O’Hare CEH Dorset Winfrith Technology Centre Winfrith Newburgh Dorchester Dorset DT2 8ZD Telephone (01305) 213500 Main Fax (01305) 213600 www.ceh.ac.uk Integrated fisheries, RHS and ecological data model for the River Lee P. M. Scarlett , M O’Hare Project leader: P.Scarlett Report to Environment Agency NE Thames Area CEH Project No: C01019 Date: January 2006 INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT ‘In accordance with our normal practice, this report is for the use only of the party to whom it is addressed, and no responsibility is accepted to any third party for the whole or any part of its contents. Neither the whole nor any part of this report or any reference thereto may be included in any published document, circular or statement, nor published or referred to in any way without our written approval of the form and context in which it may appear’ Contents 1 Background 1.1 Introduction 1 1.2 Objectives 1 1.3 General description of the Lee catchment 3 2 Habitat Quality of the catchment 6 2.1 Habitat Quality and impacts 6 2.2 Land Use 6 2.3 Matrix of high quality and degraded sites 6 2.4 Substrates and flows 7 2.5 Stream Power 8 2.6 Fine Sediment Sources and bank Sensitivity Index 8 2.7 Nuisance and invasive species 8 3 Analysis of fish data 12 3.1 RHS data and its relationship with guild composition 12 3.2 RHS and fisheries data 17 3.3 Identification of suitable sites for guilds using RHS variables 18 3.4 Migration and movement 20 3.5 Siltation 20 3.6 Channel morphology and habitat quality 23 3.7 Early life stages 23 3.8 Water levels 23 3.9 Chemical water quality 23 3.10 Species specific habitat requirements 24 4 Conclusion 25 References 26 Figures Figure 1 Location of RHS sites on the river Lee catchment 2 Figure 2a Solid geology of the river Lee catchment 4 Figure 2b Drift geology of the river Lee catchment 5 Figure 3 Substrate compositions of the river Lee and tributaries 7 Figure 4 Flow compositions of the river Lee and tributaries 7 Figure 5 Distribution of invasive species on the Lee catchment 10/11 Figure 6 Location of fisheries data on the river Lee catchment 14 Figure 7 Relationship between RHS scores and fish survey data 17 Figure 8 Distribution of weirs, culverts and fords 21 Figure 9 Distribution of abstraction, silting and drought 22 Tables Table 1 Species recorded on the River Lee catchment and their spawning guilds 12 Table 2a Summary of fisheries data on tributaries of the river Lee 15 Table 2b Summary of fisheries data on the river Lee 15 Table 3 Adult habitat flexibility of different species 16 Table 4 Sites most suitable for Lithophils, Phytophils and Psammophils 18 Table 5 Count of potential barriers to migration and areas of silting 20 Table 6 Sites with habitats suitable for chubb and bleak larvae 20 Table 7 Sites with habitats suitable for Roach 24 Table 8 Sites with habitats suitable for Roach, derived from RHS data 25 Appendix Appendix 1 Habitat Quality – High quality and degraded sites 29 Appendix 2 Summary maps of each tributary and section of the main river Lee 31 1 Background 1.1 Introduction The Centre for Ecology and Hydrology (CEH) was commissioned by the Environment Agency, Thames Region, to analyse fisheries and River Habitat Survey (RHS) data from the River Lee, Hertfordshire, and five of its tributaries – Mimram, Stort, Ash, Rib and Beane (figure 1). Three hundred and thirty-five RHS surveys were used for analysis. The surveys were conducted between 2000 and 2004 by different surveyors. Most surveys were done using the most recent (2003) version of the RHS methodology (Raven et al 1997 and 1998). In order to provide more detailed information of variation along the main river Lee it was split into three sections namely upper (source - Hertford), middle (Hertford - Enfield) and lower (Enfield - Thames). The project is a continuation of the development of an integrated model to further a strategic approach to maintaining and enhancing local rivers for fish and other wildlife. 1.2 Objectives The objective of this part of the project is to incorporate a selection of previous analyses placed in reference to fisheries interests within the River Lee Catchment. This work will complement the current efforts to improve fish populations outlined in the Lee Fisheries Action Plan (Lee FAP, 2005). 1 Beane Rib ll Quin Ash Stort l ll l ll Lee l l l l lll lll l ll l l l ll l l l Luton Mimram l l ll l l ll l Stevenage ll l l l l l ll Bishops l l lll l ll l lll l Stortford l lll l l l ll l l l ll l l l lll l l l l l ll ll l ll l l lllllll l l l lllll l l ll l ll lll l ll ll l l l l llll ll ll ll ll ll llll llll l l llll llllll l ll l l l l l llll lll l ll ll lll l ll lll l ll ll lll ll llll ll llllll l l lllllllll ll l ll l l Pincey l l Hertford l l l l ll ll lll ll l l l brook l lllllllllllllllll l l ll ll ll ll lll lll lllll lll l l lll lll Enfield l l ll Tottenham l l l l Figure 1. Location of RHS sites on the River Lee catchment 2 1.3 General Description of the Lee Catchment The River Lee rises near Luton at an altitude of approximately 120m and flows in a southerly direction for 85 km where it joins the River Thames at Canning Town (Environment Agency 2004). The total catchment area is 1,420 sq. km of which the upper Lee area comprises 1033km2. The upper half of the catchment and all of the tributaries mentioned in this report have a solid geology which is based on chalk (figure 2). The lower half of the Lee catchment is based on London clay. As a result, the upper Lee and its tributaries are mostly fed from groundwater, and the flow of the lower Lee is mostly derived from overland run-off from the clay and urban areas. The chalk is only permeable to a limited degree. The drift geology is more mixed though it is dominated by boulder clay/morainic drift and glacial sand and gravel with river terrace deposits in the lower reaches. Ground slopes are mostly gentle though there are some steeper areas around the Chilterns in the Luton area. The upper part of the catchment is mostly a shallow valley, which opens out downstream into the floodplain of the Thames. There are a large number of Sites of Special Scientific Interest in the Lee valley, mainly due to the unique habitats provided by multiple river channels and the areas of standing water provided by flooded gravel workings. The Lee supports good fisheries especially in the upper reaches. Roach, bream, barbel, chub, eel, tench, dace, perch, pike and carp are all present in parts of the catchment. Agriculture is the main land use in the Upper Lee area, though urban areas cover 16% (169 km2) of this area. In the lower part of the catchment, urban areas are more extensive. Water quality of the tributaries is generally better than that of the main river Lee which is impacted by run-off from urban areas. Abstraction has a significant impact on the Lee catchment. Water is abstracted from the Lee at Ware to supply water for London and it is also subtracted further downstream to fill the Lee reservoirs. Some of the water is returned via sewage treatment works. Re- development of urban areas and agricultural intensification also threaten the catchment. 3 Solid Geology in the River Lee Catchment Legend Main tributaries in Lee catchment Solid Geology Barton, Bracklesham and Boagshot Beds Chalk including Red Chalk London Clay No program output Oldhaven, Blackheath, Woolwich, and Reading and Thanet beds Figure 2a Solid geology of the river Lee catchment 4 Drift Geology in the River Lee Catchment Legend Main tributaries in Lee catchment Drift Geology Alluvium Boulder Clay and Morainic drift Clay with flints Galcial Sand and Gravel No Drift Geology River Terrace deposits (mainly sand and gravel) Sand and Gravel of uncertain age or origin Figure 2b Drift geology of the river Lee catchment 5 2 Habitat Quality of the catchment Data collected from the RHS surveys provides detailed information on habitat characteristics of the Lee catchment is available. In order to provide an overview of theses characteristics and to illustrate both areas of high conservation value and areas where enhancement of habitats may be beneficial, a number of maps were generated (appendix 2). These are summarised below. 2.1 Habitat Quality and Impacts Using RHS data, scores were calculated for each site which indicate the extent of habitat modification and habitat quality. The Habitat Modification score (HMS) measures artificial modifications to the physical structure of the channel such as resectioning and man-made structures. The Habitat Quality assessment score (HQA) is based on the presence and extent of habitat features of known value to wildlife. Much of the catchment shows signs of having been extensively impacted with nearly all sites being designated as either severely or significantly modified.
Recommended publications
  • 36 Highbridge Street, Waltham Abbey
    36 HIGHBRIDGE STREET, WALTHAM ABBEY Flood Risk Assessment and Surface Water Drainage Statement Alcomax (Investments) Ltd SLR Ref: 408-07833-00001 Version No: 5 October 2018 36 Highbridge Street, Waltham Abbey : FRA and SWDS Filename: 181017_408-07833-00001_36HSWA_FRA_v5 SLR Ref No: 408-07833-00001 October 2018 BASIS OF REPORT This document has been prepared by SLR Consulting Limited with reasonable skill, care and diligence, and taking account of the manpower, timescales and resources devoted to it by agreement with Alcomax (Investments) Ltd. (the Client) as part or all of the services it has been appointed by the Client to carry out. It is subject to the terms and conditions of that appointment. SLR shall not be liable for the use of or reliance on any information, advice, recommendations and opinions in this document for any purpose by any person other than the Client. Reliance may be granted to a third party only in the event that SLR and the third party have executed a reliance agreement or collateral warranty. Information reported herein may be based on the interpretation of public domain data collected by SLR, and/or information supplied by the Client and/or its other advisors and associates. These data have been accepted in good faith as being accurate and valid. The copyright and intellectual property in all drawings, reports, specifications, bills of quantities, calculations and other information set out in this report remain vested in SLR unless the terms of appointment state otherwise. This document may contain information of a specialised and/or highly technical nature and the Client is advised to seek clarification on any elements which may be unclear to it.
    [Show full text]
  • Middlesex University Research Repository an Open Access Repository Of
    Middlesex University Research Repository An open access repository of Middlesex University research http://eprints.mdx.ac.uk Read, Simon ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2380-5130 (2017) Cinderella River: The evolving narrative of the River Lee. http://hydrocitizenship.com, London, pp. 1-163. [Book] Published version (with publisher’s formatting) This version is available at: https://eprints.mdx.ac.uk/23299/ Copyright: Middlesex University Research Repository makes the University’s research available electronically. Copyright and moral rights to this work are retained by the author and/or other copyright owners unless otherwise stated. The work is supplied on the understanding that any use for commercial gain is strictly forbidden. A copy may be downloaded for personal, non-commercial, research or study without prior permission and without charge. Works, including theses and research projects, may not be reproduced in any format or medium, or extensive quotations taken from them, or their content changed in any way, without first obtaining permission in writing from the copyright holder(s). They may not be sold or exploited commercially in any format or medium without the prior written permission of the copyright holder(s). Full bibliographic details must be given when referring to, or quoting from full items including the author’s name, the title of the work, publication details where relevant (place, publisher, date), pag- ination, and for theses or dissertations the awarding institution, the degree type awarded, and the date of the award. If you believe that any material held in the repository infringes copyright law, please contact the Repository Team at Middlesex University via the following email address: [email protected] The item will be removed from the repository while any claim is being investigated.
    [Show full text]
  • LONDON METROPOLITAN ARCHIVES Page 1 BRITISH WATERWAYS BOARD
    LONDON METROPOLITAN ARCHIVES Page 1 BRITISH WATERWAYS BOARD ACC/2423 Reference Description Dates LEE CONSERVANCY BOARD ENGINEER'S OFFICE Engineers' reports and letter books LEE CONSERVANCY BOARD: ENGINEER'S REPORTS ACC/2423/001 Reports on navigation - signed copies 1881 Jan-1883 Lea navigation Dec 1 volume ACC/2423/002 Reports on navigation - signed copies 1884 Jan-1886 Lea navigation Dec 1 volume ACC/2423/003 Reports on navigation - signed copies 1887 Jan-1889 Lea navigation Dec 1 volume ACC/2423/004 Reports on navigation - signed copies 1890 Jan-1893 Lea navigation Dec 1 volume ACC/2423/005 Reports on navigation - signed copies 1894 Jan-1896 Lea navigation Dec 1 volume ACC/2423/006 Reports on navigation - signed copies 1897 Jan-1899 Lea navigation Dec 1 volume ACC/2423/007 Reports on navigation - signed copies 1903 Jan-1903 Lea navigation Dec 1 volume ACC/2423/008 Reports on navigation - signed copies 1904 Jan-1904 Lea navigation Dec 1 volume ACC/2423/009 Reports on navigation - signed copies 1905 Jan-1905 Lea navigation Dec 1 volume ACC/2423/010 Reports on navigation - signed copies 1906 Jan-1906 Lea navigation Dec 1 volume LONDON METROPOLITAN ARCHIVES Page 2 BRITISH WATERWAYS BOARD ACC/2423 Reference Description Dates ACC/2423/011 Reports on navigation - signed copies 1908 Jan-1908 Lea navigation/ stort navigation Dec 1 volume ACC/2423/012 Reports on navigation - signed copies 1912 Jan-1912 Lea navigation/ stort navigation Dec 1 volume ACC/2423/013 Reports on navigation - signed copies 1913 Jan-1913 Lea navigation/ stort navigation
    [Show full text]
  • Waltham Abbey Conservation Area
    WALTHAM ABBEY CONSERVATION AREA 17 17 1 1 22 22 23 23 Drain 12 12 FB Playground HAROLD CRESCENT 109 Drain 105 11 11 21.3m 2 96 96 95 Drain 1 1 El Sub Sta 92 92 TCB HEREWARD CLOSE 1 1 93 Drain CROOKED MILE 90 90 91 7 7 AAbbebbey Fish Ponds 6 6 5 5 The Water 80 80 Tower 76 76 1 3 MILE CLOSE CS 74 74 MILE 6 6 5 5 CROOKED PARKLANDS Drain Drain MILE 64 64 Drain CROOKED 43 2b 2b 6 6 Drain The Lodge 2a 2a 6 6 20.4m PARKLANDS ABBEYVIEW 37 Subway Drain 19 17 Drain Drain St Clement's Harold's Bridge Court (restored) 26 58 58 to to 4 4 5 5 Drain MARGARET 13 FLAGSTAFF ROAD 13 Path CLOSE 10 10 Drain 9 Sluice 52 9 Drain 50 1 1 18 18 8 8 Cornmill Stream Car Parks Old River Lea or Lee 15 15 El Sub Sta 12 Community CANNON MEWS Centre Drain 1 to 4 Riverview 2 2 4 4 Drain Drain SAXON WAY 2 5 5 3 Path 3 1 1 7 to 10 Track 44 30 6 POWDERMILL LANE Ward Bdy 11 to 16 ABBEYVIEW 1 POWDERMILL MEWS 1 17 CR 19 4 4 23 23 1 1 14 25 TO 39 21 23 Gatehouse 32 12 27 31 17 17 33 CROOKED MILE 11 18 25 47 57 29 to 51 41 Path (um) 35 49 Moore House 61 55 to Moat 9 9 53 to 11 11 45 15 15 39 13 13 13 13 Abbey Gardens 22 6363 7 to l0 67 65 FB 69 PLANTAGANET PLACE 11 7 15 Weirs 14 25 25 Fn FB 13 13 Weir 9 9 12 5 5 Sluice 7 79 83 10 3 1 Posts 3 3 1 1 The Rectory 81 85 TCB Moat Highbridge 10 Court Abbey Gardens Ho PH ROMELAND 12 10 se se u u o o H H h h t t i i Ed Ed 8a 8 Stone 12 12 o o t t 1 1 NORTH PLACE 2 11 11 to to 8 1 1 2a 2a 6 10 4 16 14 The Abbey Church FB 8 8 o o t t 2 2 28 2 20 of Waltham Holy Cross 19.8m and St Lawrence Bank 30 19.2m Drain 19 36 13 13 15 15 5a 5a 1 1
    [Show full text]
  • Lee Valley Regional Park Strategic Planning Evidence and Policies
    Lee Valley Regional Park Authority Park Development Framework Strategic Policies April 2019 Lee Valley Regional Park Authority Park Development Framework Strategic Policies Prepared by LUC Planning & EIA LUC LONDON Offices also in: Land Use Consultants Ltd Design 43 Chalton Street Bristol Registered in England Registered number: 2549296 Landscape Planning London Edinburgh Registered Office: Landscape Management NW1 1JD Glasgow 43 Chalton Street Ecology T +44 (0)20 7383 5784 Lancaster London NW1 1JD GIS & Visualisation [email protected] Manchester FS 566056 EMS 566057 LUC uses 100% recycled paper Executive Summary Extending north from East India Dock Basin for 26 miles, and broadly aligned with the natural course of the river Lea through east London and Essex to Ware in Hertfordshire, the Lee Valley Regional Park presents a rich tapestry of award winning international sports venues, attractive parklands and areas of significant ecological importance. The Park attracts over 7 million visits each year largely drawn from London, Hertfordshire and Essex but given the international status of its venues increasingly from across the United Kingdom and abroad. The Regional Park lies at the centre of one of Europe’s largest regeneration areas which includes London 2012 and its Legacy, major developments in the lower Lee Valley, Meridian Water and a range of large schemes coming forward in Epping Forest District and the Borough of Broxbourne. The Authority’s adopted policies date from 2000 and, given the Regional Park’s rapidly changing context, a new approach is required. The Strategic Aims and Policies, Landscape Strategy and Area Proposals included in the Park Development Framework are designed to respond to this changing context to ensure that the Regional Park can maintain its role as an exciting and dynamic destination which caters for leisure, recreation and the natural environment over the next 10-15 years.
    [Show full text]
  • The Navigation of the River Lee (1190 – 1790)
    Edmonton Hundred Historical Society Occasional Paper New Series No. 36 by J.G.L.Burnby and M.Parker. Published 1978 Added to the site by kind permission of Mr Michael Parker THE NAVIGATION OF THE RIVER LEE (1190 – 1790) PREFACE As the men of the river frequently pointed out the Lee is one of the "great rivers of the realm", and it is only fitting that its history should be traced; indeed it is surprising that the task has not been carried out far earlier than this. Regretfully the story of its busiest period in the days of post-canalisation has had to be left to another, later Occasional Paper. The spelling of the name of the river has varied over the centuries. In 1190 it was referred to as "the water of Lin", in the fourteenth century as "La Leye", the cartographer Saxton seems to have been the first to introduce "Lea" to map-makers in 1576, in the eighteenth century it was not infrequently called the "Ware River" but the commonest spelling would seem to be "Lee" and it is to this which we have decided to adhere. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We would like to thank the London Borough of Haringey Libraries panel for their financial assistance in the publication of this paper. Our gratitude also goes to the Marquess of Salisbury for granting permission to reproduce the maps held in the Hatfield House Collection. A number of people have most generously helped us in the production of this paper. Mrs.H.Baker has with her usual expertise drawn the map of the lower reaches of the river, and Mr.Neil Clements is responsible for the charming reproductions of the prints of the Powder Mill at Waltham Abbey and the river at Ware.
    [Show full text]
  • Riverside Tales
    Riverside tales Lessons for water management reform from three English rivers Riverside tales 1 Contents 1 Executive summary 3 Introduction 4 Unsustainable abstraction – the problem of taking too much 8 The iconic chalk stream – the Itchen 15 The Cinderella rivers – the Mimram and the Beane 23 Over the hill and far away – the upper Kennet 27 What can we learn? – barriers to reducing damaging abstraction 32 Moving forward – a new approach to restoring sustainable abstraction WWF is working on freshwater issues in the UK to: n Safeguard the natural world by protecting our native ecosystems n Change the way we live, so we waste less water n Tackle climate change by promoting water management measures that will help our rivers cope with a climate change. 2 Riverside tales Executive summary WWF’s Rivers on the Edge programme campaigns to raise n Plans for water efficiency fell short – annual water efficiency awareness of the impact on nature from taking too much plans expect to save the equivalent of just 0.34% of total water from our rivers. We’re working to develop solutions water supplied to households. A significant number of water to help reduce waste and protect our rivers now, and in company Water Resource Management Plans do not aim to the face of climate change. In 2009, a number of key plans meet the government’s target of 130 litres per person per day were finalised that will impact on how water is managed by 2030. for years to come: the 2009 Periodic Review of Water n Plans for tackling leakage stagnated.
    [Show full text]
  • “Peelers Progress”
    “PEELERS PROGRESS” Policing Waltham Abbey since 1840 by Bryn Elliott Foreword The police in Waltham Abbey are not a unique band of men and women in themselves. The station buildings occupied by the police in the locality were never structures considered in the forefront of architectural style. Although there were a few well known cases, no mind shattering, world famous crimes were ever said to have taken place in the area, and yet...... Here is a story of one relatively insignificant police station situated for 160 years on the outer edges of the Metropolitan Police District. It may be a surprise to learn that from the pages of this story that some well known cases were indeed enacted within its jurisdiction, and that the officers serving there were, on occasion, embroiled in famous events outside of the town. In writing this history of Waltham Abbey police officers, and the buildings in which they served, I have attempted to refrain from setting down the whole history of local law and order. Brief mention is made of the arrangement in force prior to the arrival of the Metropolitan Police in the area, hopefully in context. Other than those few instances I have avoided the period that would inevitably include such well known figures as the highwaymen Dick Turpin and the Gregory Gang, who included large swathes of Epping Forest in their plundering forays. Highwaymen have strong connections with the area during the 18th Century, but this is primarily the story of the modern police and the locality they served. It is unfortunate that few of the 19th Century local historians thought fit to make more than a passing mention of their local police force.
    [Show full text]
  • Flooding - Roles & Responsibilities
    Flooding - roles & responsibilities Environment Agency Strategic Overview for all flooding operational responsibility for main river and sea Lead Local Flood Authority Operational responsibility for surface water, ground water and ordinary watercourses. Thames Water Operational responsibility for sewer flooding. The Strategic overview A strategic overview across all flooding risks to facilitate management through a risk based approach Strategic flood Local flood risk risk • Surface runoff • Main rivers • Groundwater • Sea • Ordinary • Reservoirs watercourses Coastal erosion Strategic overview Assets – maintenance, inspection and new schemes to reduce the risk EA FRM projects in Hertfordshire Furneux Pelham Stevenage Central Watford Improvement Works Hemel Hempstead London Colney Harpenden/Batford Puckeridge Little Hadham Cheshunt Stanstead Abbotts EA maintenance projects Aberford Road Oil Interceptor H&S Improvements Amwell Bailey Bridge, Ware - Refurbishment Aston Valley Flood Storage Area, Stevenage - Statutory Remedial Works Fieldes Weir, Hoddesdon - PLC Upgrade/Simplification Hardmead Sluice, Ware - Replacement of Flood Control Structure Hardmead Sluice, Ware - Replacement of Penstocks to Sluice Gate Heavy River Improvement Package LFRC Control Structures, Ware to Enfield Island - Gantry Hoist Replacement Package Meadgate Sluices, Hoddesdon, Actuator and Gearbox Replacement Papermill Stream Penstock, Channel and Bridge, Standon - M&E Upgrade & stuctural repairs Region wide Radio Frequency Tagging Identification of M & E Assets Sele Mill Siphon, Hertford - Electrical panel and lighting refurbishment Stanstead Radial Gate replacement located along the River Lee in Stanstead Abbott Warrengate Rd Flood Gate Repairs & Traffic Management Improvement EA environment projects Restoring passage on the River Beane up to Sele Mill Stort Valley Landscape Opportunity Area, River Stort. Little Hallingbury Marsh, Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI), River Stort.
    [Show full text]
  • Hartham Common GAP 2018-23 Full Doc with Maps FINAL
    HARTHAM COMMON GREENSPACE ACTION PLAN (GAP) 2018 – 2023 June 2018 v0 OVERVIEW i. Greenspace Action Plans (GAPs) Greenspace Actions Plans, or GAPs, are map-based management plans which specify activities that should take place on a site over a stated period of time; these activities will help to deliver the agreed aspirations which the site managers and stakeholders have identified for that site. ii. Public Engagement Engagement with stakeholders is at the centre of effective management planning on any site. An initial engagement period was held for Hartham Common in March 2018, to establish core aims and objectives for the site; these are reflected in Section 4. A second stage of engagement completed in May 2018 enabled stakeholders and users/local residents/wider public to comment on the proposed management actions for the site. An associated engagement response document, published online as an appendix to this plan, summarises comments received and any amendments made to the plan as a result. iii. Version Control Amendment Version Section Updated Details Date No Hartham Common GAP 2018-23 2 CMS June 2018 v0 CONTENTS 1.0 SITE SUMMARY 4 2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION 5 2.1 Location Map 5 2.2 Site Description Map 6 2.3 Constraints Map 7 3.0 INTRODUCTION 8 4.0 REVIEW OF PREVIOUS GAP 8 5.0 AIMS AND OBJECTIVES 9 6.0 FIVE YEAR ACTION PLAN 13 6.1 Annual Items 14 6.2 Year 1 Action Plan and Map 2018-19 17 6.3 Year 2 Action Plan and Map 2019-20 22 6.4 Year 3-5 Action Plans and Map 2020-23 27 7.0 MONITORING AND REVIEW 30 7.1 Monitoring the Action Plans 30
    [Show full text]
  • Archaeological Solutions 2013
    ©Archaeological Solutions 2013 ARCHAEOLOGICAL SOLUTIONS LTD LAND NORTH OF HERTFORD, HERTFORDSHIRE AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL DESK-BASED ASSESSMENT HER Req. No. 155/13 Authors: Kate Higgs MA (Oxon.) NGR: TL 3233 1481 Report No: 4423 District: East Hertfordshire Site Code: N/A Approved: C. Halpin MIfA Project No: 5430 Date: 29 October 2013 Signed: This report is confidential to the client. Archaeological Solutions Ltd accepts no responsibility or liability to any third party to whom this report, or any part of it, is made known. Any such party relies upon this report entirely at their own risk. No part of this report may be reproduced by any means without permission. Land north of Hertford, Hertfordshire. An Archaeological Desk-Based Assessment. ©Archaeological Solutions 2013 Archaeological Solutions is an independent archaeological contractor providing the services which satisfy all archaeological requirements of planning applications, including: Desk-based assessments and environmental impact assessments Historic building recording and appraisals Trial trench evaluations Geophysical surveys Archaeological monitoring and recording Archaeological excavations Post excavation analysis Promotion and outreach Specialist analysis ARCHAEOLOGICAL SOLUTIONS LTD 98-100 Fore Street, Hertford SG14 1AB Tel 01992 558170 Unit 6, Brunel Business Court, Eastern Way, Bury St Edmunds IP32 7AJ Tel 01284 765210 e-mail [email protected] www.archaeologicalsolutions.co.uk twitter.com/ArchaeologicalS g www.facebook.com/ArchaeologicalSolutions Land north of Hertford,
    [Show full text]
  • Hertford & Ware Activity
    (Rye Meads Visitor Centre continued) Family fun days Hartham Common [B-C3] King’s Meads [D2] Parks, woodland & nature reserves are also organised particularly to engage children who This pleasant area of parkland is situated adjacent Managed by the Herts and Middlesex Wildlife Trust Hertford & Ware can loan a special ‘explorers pack’ when they visit. Amwell Nature Reserve [G3] to Hartham Leisure Centre. Walks lead across the this is the largest area of grazed riverside meadow in Only moments from the River Lea towpath, the common and into the wooded area known as The Hertfordshire. The rivers and ditches which criss-cross Get out nature reserve is a mecca for local wildlife after being Warren. Besides the tennis courts, football pitches the site traditionally fl ooded the fl at land; but because Activity Map transformed from its former use as a quarry. Managed and children’s play area there is also a trim trail and of falling water levels this now happens less often. Waterford Heath & Marsh [A-B2] and explore by the Herts and Middlesex Wildlife Trust the site is swimming pool to keep you fi t! A skate park has also This combination of ditches, fl oodwater and regular The marsh provides a great place for a stroll along the renowned for populations of waterfowl, breeding birds, recently opened. grazing has created a rich wetland habitat that is River Beane which you share with grazing cattle and dragonfl ies and damselfl ies. Although public access becoming very rare in Britain. passing trains on the Hertford North branch. There is an open space into the reserve is limited, spectacular views across the The heath was developed into a community nature site including the lakes can be gained from the public within walking distance Hertford Heath [E4] park in the mid nineties once the former sand and hide by Great Hardmead Lake.
    [Show full text]