DOCSLIB.ORG

Riverside Tales

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Riverside Tales Riverside tales Lessons for water management reform from three English rivers Riverside tales 1 Contents 1 Executive summary 3 Introduction 4 Unsustainable abstraction – the problem of taking too much 8 The iconic chalk stream – the Itchen 15 The Cinderella rivers – the Mimram and the Beane 23 Over the hill and far away – the upper Kennet 27 What can we learn? – barriers to reducing damaging abstraction 32 Moving forward – a new approach to restoring sustainable abstraction WWF is working on freshwater issues in the UK to: n Safeguard the natural world by protecting our native ecosystems n Change the way we live, so we waste less water n Tackle climate change by promoting water management measures that will help our rivers cope with a climate change. 2 Riverside tales Executive summary WWF’s Rivers on the Edge programme campaigns to raise n Plans for water efficiency fell short – annual water efficiency awareness of the impact on nature from taking too much plans expect to save the equivalent of just 0.34% of total water from our rivers. We’re working to develop solutions water supplied to households. A significant number of water to help reduce waste and protect our rivers now, and in company Water Resource Management Plans do not aim to the face of climate change. In 2009, a number of key plans meet the government’s target of 130 litres per person per day were finalised that will impact on how water is managed by 2030. for years to come: the 2009 Periodic Review of Water n Plans for tackling leakage stagnated. Ofwat has allowed Company prices; the Water Framework Directive River companies to reduce leakage by about 2%, despite the fact Basin Management Plans; and the 25 year Water Resource that total leakage is about 3,000 million litres every day. This is Management Plans. equivalent to the Environment Agency’s estimate of the amount This report focuses on the impact of these plans on unique that is needed to restore sustainable levels of abstraction chalk streams under stress – the Itchen, the upper Kennet across the country. and the tributaries of the upper Lee (the Mimram and the n Metering is not being rolled out fast enough, and a number Beane). We look at the outcomes for each to understand of water company plans for enhanced metering schemes whether government, regulator and water company plans were not approved by Ofwat, even in catchments that are will restore and protect these important rivers for people significantly water scarce. and nature. On the basis of the assessment of the decisions made through these planning processes, we develop n The Water Framework Directive River Basin Management conclusions and lessons for future reform. Plans do not contain clear measures and timetables to address abstraction on catchments not protected by the There was some significant progress in 2009. Ofwat’s water Habitats Directive, even when the river is failing to meet efficiency target has meant that – for the first time – all water ‘good ecological status’ as a result of over-abstraction. Clear companies have an obligation to deliver water efficiency, bringing measures and timeframes for resolving the problem of over- it into the boardroom of every company. Six companies are also abstraction have not been provided, including the absence of planning large scale water efficiency retrofit projects, meaning a time-bound mechanism for implementing licence changes on thousands of new homes will be more water efficient by 2015. the Kennet, Mimram and Beane, despite the problem having There are plans for more water meters (to increase the proportion been acknowledged years – and even decades – ago. of households metered from 37% to 50% by 2015) and, for the first time, Ofwat’s Final Determination has meant that proposed n The mismatch of historical water licences with Ofwat’s demand measures outweigh development of new supply1. assessments of water availability creates a perverse signal in the water and housing planning sectors. Historical abstraction The Environment Agency’s Restoring Sustainable Abstraction licences help create an illusion of ‘water surplus’, even scheme has made progress with a number of investigations when current abstraction is significantly affecting ecology on into the environmental impact of abstraction across the country; the ground. Historical licence amounts rather than current there has been agreement to fund a number of reductions conditions have been used when creating water and housing in abstraction licences for Habitats Directive sites (including plans, creating a fallacy whereby more homes are planned and the River Itchen) through water bills. The Cave2 and Walker3 measures to reduce demand for water are not judged to be reviews, arising from the government’s Future Water strategy4, cost-beneficial for areas already identified as under significant recommended that the abstraction licensing regime should water stress. reflect the scarcity value of water. n In the main, water companies tend to maintain the supply- But progress has not gone far enough, and opportunities continue demand balance in traditional, ‘comfortable’ ways. We have to be missed. The situation facing rivers across the country is seen limited use of creative solutions to address unsustainable serious: ecosystems in a third of river catchments are under threat abstraction, for example through demand reduction and because abstraction and licence levels are too high. With climate optimisation of water resource networks. change projected to have significant impacts on natural river flows, and population growth likely to cause significant rise in demand, the future doesn’t look bright for our rivers unless we grab all available opportunities. A number of key opportunities to protect freshwater ecosystems were missed in 2009. For example: Left: the River Itchen navigation Riverside tales 1 The Itchen – the iconic chalk stream – can be held up as the 2. There is an urgent need for incentives to manage water success story of our three case studies. Because it is protected resources sustainably, creating market-based mechanisms under the Habitats Directive, the Environment Agency, Ofwat to complement existing regulatory approaches. and water company have worked to ensure that solutions to n A rapid move to universal metering now needs to be secured. unsustainable abstraction – including demand management – will n Scarcity charges on abstraction where and when water is be implemented. The other rivers are not so lucky. The Mimram scarce should be introduced. and Beane are not deemed to be of national importance, which n With appropriate safeguards, barriers to trading and sharing has meant that – despite the long recognised problems – funding water between companies should be removed. has not been approved to reduce abstraction. Alarmingly, because n Many of these incentive-based objectives could be delivered the historical, over-inflated licences remain in place (creating most efficiently through the introduction of the linked scarcity an illusion that sufficient water is available), demand measures charge and reverse auction process contemplated by the that could reduce pressure from abstraction have also not been Cave Review. approved, while plans for new housing have been given the green light. The Kennet faces a similar situation, despite the water 3. The mismatch between Ofwat and company assessments company investing locally in water efficiency measures. of water resource availability and the Environment Agency’s assessment of over-abstraction must be reconciled, as it is Under the current ‘rules of the game’ no single player – Ofwat, currently driving bizarre regulatory outcomes. the Environment Agency, water companies – can be held fully n Ofwat, advised by the Environment Agency, needs to develop accountable for the current lack of progress. The game itself – a methodology for assessing water resource availability that the framework for how we manage water resources in England reflects scarcity. and Wales – needs to be changed. We need new thinking about n This methodology should be used when planning new how to address current problems, in order to develop policy, developments and housing, as well as when planning for regulatory and business frameworks that are flexible enough to water resources. meet today’s challenges and adapt as the climate changes. Our current systems are rigid and the tools are blunt; modern water 4. More sophisticated and innovative responses to periods management must be responsive, innovative in delivery and use of below average rainfall could lead to low-cost solutions to multiple instruments to deliver ‘low regret’ outcomes. Above all, over-abstraction. we need clear commitment to address unsustainable abstraction, n More flexible mechanisms (with multiple trigger points) need to remove barriers and develop new approaches. We cannot expect be developed for responding to periods of below average water companies to make more sustainable decisions if there are availability, and rewarding these through the regulatory regime. systemic disincentives to them doing so; we cannot expect the n Consideration should be given to distinguishing between public to pay for solutions unless they are aware of the problems; normal year and below-average year abstraction volumes in water companies cannot expect their customers to act to save water licences. water unless the companies are fully convinced about the benefits of water efficiency. 5. We must stimulate and maximise opportunities available WWF is calling
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Water Efficiency and the Water Companies a 2010 UK Review Contents
    Water Efficiency and the Water Companies a 2010 UK Review Contents 01 Foreword 02 Supportive Quotes from Ministers, Water UK and Regulators 05 Part 1: Introduction and overview of water efficiency initiatives 06 Introduction 08 1.1 Direct activities of water companies to engage with all sectors 08 Engaging through online activities 08 Communicating to domestic customers 09 Working closely with non-domestic customers 09 Providing a range of water-efficient products 10 Promoting water efficiency outdoors 10 Communicating with schools and other groups 11 Working with the public sector – schools, hospitals and local councils etc 12 1.2 Working in partnership to deliver joint water efficiency campaigns 12 Waterwise 13 Waterwise East 13 Tap into Savings 14 Waterwise and Energy Saving Trust’s Regional Environmental Networks for Energy and Water (RENEW) project 14 Joint communications campaigns 15 The Water School website 15 South East Communications Group (formerly South-East Drought Communications Group) 16 1.3 Networks to learn and share information on water efficiency 16 Water Saving Group 16 Saving Water in Scotland 17 National Water Conservation Group 17 Water Efficiency Network 17 Watersave Network 18 1.4 Evidence Base for Large-Scale Water Efficiency in Homes 20 Water company areas 21 Part 2: Water company water efficiency highlights and case studies 22 Introduction 23 Anglian Water 23 Bournemouth and West Hampshire Water 24 Bristol Water 24 Cambridge Water 25 Dee Valley Water 25 Essex and Suffolk Water 26 Northern Ireland Water 26 Northumbrian
    [Show full text]
  • Looking After the Environment
    Looking After the Environment 123 124 Looking After the Environment Strategic Objectives • To protect and enhance Dacorum’s distinctive landscape character, open spaces, biological and geological diversity and historic environment. • To promote the use of renewable resources, protect natural resources and reduce waste. • To protect people and property from flooding. • To minimise the effects of pollution on people and the environment. 16. Enhancing the Natural Environment 16.1 The borough’s landscape, its appearance, its economy, its habitats and its heritage are a valued asset. The protection and enhancement of its natural environment through prudent investment and careful management is a key local priority. Protecting and Improving the Landscape 16.2 The majority of Dacorum is within the Chilterns National Landscape Area. 1 Whilst the character of south eastern section has been eroded through 20 th century development, much of the remainder is protected by its designation as an Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB). 16.3 The Chilterns Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB) is one of the borough’s most important landscape assets. It was designated for the natural beauty of its landscape and its natural and cultural heritage. Its special qualities include the steep chalk escarpment with areas of flower-rich downland, woodland, commons, tranquil valleys, the network of ancient routes, villages with their brick and flint houses, chalk streams and a rich historic environment. Its conservation and enhancement is a national priority that will be reflected locally. The Chilterns Conservation Board has a statutory duty to produce a Management Plan, supported by a Delivery Plan. This identifies the management issues faced and provides policies and actions to guide the work of all those who care for the AONB.
    [Show full text]
  • Middlesex University Research Repository an Open Access Repository Of
    Middlesex University Research Repository An open access repository of Middlesex University research http://eprints.mdx.ac.uk Read, Simon ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2380-5130 (2017) Cinderella River: The evolving narrative of the River Lee. http://hydrocitizenship.com, London, pp. 1-163. [Book] Published version (with publisher’s formatting) This version is available at: https://eprints.mdx.ac.uk/23299/ Copyright: Middlesex University Research Repository makes the University’s research available electronically. Copyright and moral rights to this work are retained by the author and/or other copyright owners unless otherwise stated. The work is supplied on the understanding that any use for commercial gain is strictly forbidden. A copy may be downloaded for personal, non-commercial, research or study without prior permission and without charge. Works, including theses and research projects, may not be reproduced in any format or medium, or extensive quotations taken from them, or their content changed in any way, without first obtaining permission in writing from the copyright holder(s). They may not be sold or exploited commercially in any format or medium without the prior written permission of the copyright holder(s). Full bibliographic details must be given when referring to, or quoting from full items including the author’s name, the title of the work, publication details where relevant (place, publisher, date), pag- ination, and for theses or dissertations the awarding institution, the degree type awarded, and the date of the award. If you believe that any material held in the repository infringes copyright law, please contact the Repository Team at Middlesex University via the following email address: [email protected] The item will be removed from the repository while any claim is being investigated.
    [Show full text]
  • Singlers Marsh Plan
    SINGLERS MARSH LOCAL NATURE RESERVE WELWYN HERTFORDSHIRE Management Plan 2014 -2024 (JUNE 2014) SINGLERS MARSH, WELWYN, HERTFORDSHIRE Management Plan Section 1 DESCRIPTION 1 1.1 Name of Site 1 1.2 Location 1 1.3 Tenure 1 1.4 Legal Constraints 1 1.5 Physical Description 2 1.6 Ecological Description 2 1.7 Site History 5 1.8 Present Use 6 Section 2 EVALUATION 6 2.1 Wildlife Value 7 2.2. Amenity Value 7 2.3. Educational Value 7 2.4 Site Potential 7 2.5 The Role of Countryside Stewardship 8 Section 3 FUTURE MANAGEMENT 8 3.1 Objectives of Future Management 8 3.2 Management Proposals 8 3.3 Getting the work done 10 3.4 Community Involvement 10 Section 4 ANNUAL WORK PROGRAMME 11 Section 5 SITE MONITORING & REVIEW 12 5.1 Annual Monitoring 12 5.2 Plan Review 12 Section 6 Maps Section 1 DESCRIPTION 1.1 Name of Site Singlers Marsh Local Nature Reserve 1.2 Location Singlers Marsh is located to the immediate north of the village of Welwyn. A little more than three quarters of the site lies within the area administered by Welwyn Hatfield Council in central Hertfordshire, the remainder being within North Hertfordshire District Council’s area. The site’s eastern boundary is formed by the River Mimram and by enclosed private gardens along the B656 road between Welwyn and Codicote. On the west side are public roads with more residential properties. To the east of the site beyond the Codicote Road is Danesbury Local Nature Reserve, also owned by Welwyn Hatfield Borough Council.
    [Show full text]
  • Veolia Water Central Limited 2011 New Chair State
    Annual !Report !and !Financial !Statements !! for !the !Year !Ended !31 !March !2011 ! ! Veolia !Water !Central !Ltd ! ! ! ! ! (Registered !Number: !2546950) ! Veolia Water Central Limited Contents Page HISTORICAL COST FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Chairman’s Statement.................................................................................... 3 Directors......................................................................................................... 5 Board Committees, Executives and Advisers................................................ 6 Report of the Directors ................................................................................... 7 Corporate Governance Report....................................................................... 15 Remuneration Report..................................................................................... 19 Independent Auditors’ Report ........................................................................ 22 Profit and Loss Account ................................................................................. 24 Statement of Total Recognised Gains and Losses........................................ 25 Balance Sheet................................................................................................ 26 Cash Flow Statement..................................................................................... 27 Notes to the Cash Flow Statement ................................................................ 28 Notes to the Financial Statements ................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to St Mary's Tombs
    The Legend of Fig Tree Tomb Guide to The Fig Tree Tomb was a popular tourist attraction in Victorian times. Using money raised through the National Lottery, the Heritage Legend claims that the person buried there was an atheist, who had Lottery Fund (HLF) aims to make a lasting difference for heritage, St Mary’s asked that something be buried in the tomb that could germinate if people and communities across the UK and help build a resilient there was life after death. heritage economy. Tombs The existence of God was proved by a fig tree that grew up from the From museums, parks and historic places to archaeology, natural tomb, dislodging the lid. This strange sight drew visitors to the environment and cultural traditions, we invest in every part of our graveyard, to hear the story and take a twig as a souvenir. The fig diverse heritage. Across the East of England we have awarded over tree has long since gone, but the tomb and the legend remains. £370 million to more than 3,300 projects since 1994. Website: www.hlf.org.uk St Mary’s Church is a vibrant Anglican community in the heart of Watford. The Church organises a wide range of services, concerts and other events. Website: www.stmaryswatford.org Additional funding and support for this project was provided by Watford Borough Council and Watford Museum. For further information on the history of the memorial structures and the restoration project, please visit the Museum’s website. If you are interested in getting involved in future events relating to the green space in St Mary’s, please contact the Museum.
    [Show full text]
  • Consultees for the Implementation of the Sustainable Drainage
    Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs December 2011 Consultees list for the consultation on national build standards and automatic adoption arrangements for gravity foul sewers and lateral drains Contents About this document ................................................................................................................. 1 Our consultees ......................................................................................................................... 1 About this document The consultation describes how Government proposes to implement the Flood and Water Management Act 2010 (the Act) for the construction standards and automatic adoption of new- build sewers England. It should be noted that this list of consultees is not exhaustive. We welcome views from anyone expressing an interest in the consultation. Although not specified on the list, some individuals and all the local authorities in England have been contacted. These authorities include borough, district, city and county councils. It should be noted that the Welsh Government is consulting separately on this subject. Our consultees 2B Landscape Consultancy 365 Environmental Services 3e Consulting Engineers Ltd A.L.H. Environmental Services Aberyswyth University ACO Technologies plc Alde and Ore Association Allen Pyke Association Albion Water Allianz Insurance All Internal Drainage Boards All Local Authorities All Parliamentary Group on sewers and sewerage All Parliamentary Group on Water Amey Anglian (Central) Regional Flood Defence Committee Anglian
    [Show full text]
  • Appraising Chalk Streams Using Citizen Science
    Appraising chalk streams using citizen science Ellie Beach, Judy England, Angela Gurnell Introduction quality. The Modular River Survey (ModRS; England Citizen science plays an important role in providing et al. 2017a, Gurnell et al., 2016, Shuker et al. 2017) invaluable data for research and nature conservation. provides a means to assess the quality of physical Without the thousands of dedicated citizen scientists habitat and functioning of rivers and streams. Within across the globe we would not have the knowledge that this study we explore how these two citizen science we do today. There are many different river citizen techniques can be used together to assess our rivers science projects which can aid in environmental and whether the data can be combined to identify the assessment. The Riverfly Partnership is a dynamic habitat characteristics Riverfly populations require. network of organisations, representing anglers, conservationists, entomologists, scientists, water Study sites course managers and relevant authorities, working The River Mimram, one of Hertfordshire’s chalk together to protect the water quality of our rivers; streams, proved an ideal study site as along its length furthering the understanding of Riverfly populations it provides a range of habitat types. Many sections and conserving Riverfly habitats. The Partnership’s are relatively natural but there is evidence of human approach assesses Riverflies to provide a simple modification in others, for example at Singler’s Marsh monitoring technique which can be used to assess river in Welwyn where concrete banks have been installed Hoo Farm Kimpton Mill Singlers Marsh Singlers Marsh 1 (south end) (restored) Tewinbury Digswell Meadow (downstream of drain) Panshanger (diversion) Panshanger (disturbed by bench) Figure 1.
    [Show full text]
  • East Hertfordshire District Council Level 1 and 2 Strategic Flood Risk
    ESSENTIAL REFERENCE PAPER B East Hertfordshire District Council Level 1 and 2 Strategic Flood Risk Assessment Final Report August 2016 East Hertfordshire District Council P O Box 104 Wallfields, Pegs Lane HERTFORD SG13 8EQ This page is intentionally left blank 2016s4502 East Hertfordshire District Council - Level 1&2 SFRA Final v1.0 i JBA Project Manager Joanne Chillingworth JBA Consulting The Library St Philip’s Courtyard Church End COLESHILL B46 3AD Revision History Revision Ref / Date Issued Amendments Issued to Draft v1.0 / August 2016 Chris Butcher, East Hertfordshire District Council Final v1.0 / August 2016 Chris Butcher, East Hertfordshire District Council Contract This report describes work commissioned by East Hertfordshire District Council. The Council’s representative for the contract was Chris Butcher. Prepared by .................................................. Alice Blanchard BSc Analyst Sophie Dusting BSc MEPS Analyst Reviewed by ................................................. Joanne Chillingworth BSc MSc MCIWEM C.WEM Chartered Senior Analyst Purpose This document has been prepared as a Final Report for East Hertfordshire District Council. JBA Consulting accepts no responsibility or liability for any use that is made of this document other than by the Client for the purposes for which it was originally commissioned and prepared. JBA Consulting has no liability regarding the use of this report except to East Hertfordshire District Council. 2016s4502 East Hertfordshire District Council - Level 1&2 SFRA Final v1.0 ii
    [Show full text]
  • History of the Hertfordshire Natural History Society
    History of the Hertfordshire Natural History Society The Society was established in January 1875 as the Watford Natural History Society and Hertfordshire Field Club by a group of local naturalists, headed by John Hopkinson (pictured) who later became secretary and president. The objectives were: ‘the investigation of the Meteorology, Geology, Botany and Zoology of the neighbourhood of Watford and the County of Hertford, and the dissemination amongst its members of information on Natural History and Microscopical Science’. The Society expanded rapidly and in 1879 extended its remit to the whole county and took the name the Hertfordshire Natural History Society and Field Club. In the early days the membership was drawn from a wealthy and scientifically minded elite group. In 1880 this included eleven titled gentlemen including the Marquis of Salisbury, five Fellows of the Royal Society, numerous fellows of other learned societies and twelve clergy, Charles Darwin was elected an Honorary Member in 1877. They had the time, inclination and resources to explore the county using the latest scientific knowledge and techniques. Despite the difficulty of travel limited to railways, horses and bicycles, they met weekly during the summer months for field trips throughout the county. These often ended with tea taken in the garden of an eminent local member. In the early years, the Society inherited the work of a number of Victorian naturalists, especially botanists and geologists. The Revd. R. H. Webb, who had co-authored the first Hertfordshire "Flora" in 1849 with W. H. Coleman, survived just long enough to be a founder member of the Society.
    [Show full text]
  • Kennet and Coln River Levels Study Volume
    NRA Thames 113 NRA Thames Region KENNET AND COLN RIVER LEVELS STUDY Final Report VOLUME ONE - RIVER KENNET K 1064/070/0/004 May 1992 - KEN KENNET AND COLN RIVER LEVELS STUDY FINAL REPORT VOLUME ONE ■ RIVER KENNET CLIENT: National Rivers Authority - Thames Region NCA (|3 CONSULTANT: WS Atkins Consultants Ltd. En v i r o n m e n t Ag e n c y NATIONAL LIBRARY & DOCUMENT NUMBER: K1064/070/0/004 information serv ic e HEAD OFFICE Rio House, Waterside Drive, Aztec West, Almondsbury. Bristol BS32 4UD A X . s . 2 6 -5 - 9 A / - . REVISION PURPOSE PREPARED CHECKED REVIEWED BY BY BY ENVIRONMENT AGENCY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This document is Volume One of a two volume Final Report on the Kennet and Coin River Levels Study and considers the Upper Kennet catchment above Knighton gauging station. The Study was commissioned largely as a result of public concern that the character of the river had changed over the last 30 years. The fundamental concern was with reduced river levels and the general view was that reductions were caused, in great part, by groundwater abstraction for public supply outside the Kennet catchment. The Study was divided into two stages and an Interim Report on the Stage One Study was issued in December 1991. This Report updates the findings of the Stage One Study and presents the findings for both Stage One and Stage Two. Stage One of the Study considered how the four main measures of the character of the catchment viz: ° Groundwater levels ° Surface flow, water level and the upper limit of flow ° Water quality ° Flora and fauna have changed with time.
    [Show full text]
  • Watching Brief Report
    T H A M E S V A L L E Y AARCHAEOLOGICALRCHAEOLOGICAL S E R V I C E S Chapel Meadow, Copse Grove, Ogbourne St George, Wiltshire Archaeological Watching Brief by Daniel Bray Site Code: OSG12/07 (SU 2044 7435) New Grain Store, Chapel Meadow, Copse Grove, Ogbourne St George, Wiltshire An Archaeological Watching Brief For Mr R Iliffe by Daniel Bray Thames Valley Archaeological Services Ltd Site Code OSG 12/07 November 2012 Summary Site name: New Grain Store, Chapel Meadow, Copse Grove, Ogbourne St George, Wiltshire Grid reference: SU 2044 7435 Site activity: Watching Brief Date and duration of project: 8th September – 12th September 2012 Project manager: Steve Ford Site supervisor: Daniel Bray Site code: OSG 12/07 Area of site: c.0.5 ha Summary of results: A single ring gully was found measuring approximately 9m in diameter. It revealed an incomplete skeleton of a baby but contained no dateable finds. From its form, it is likely that the structure is a house of Iron Age date but is possibly a small levelled round barrow of Bronze Age date. Location and reference of archive: The archive is presently held at Thames Valley Archaeological Services, Reading and will be deposited at Devizes Museum in due course. This report may be copied for bona fide research or planning purposes without the explicit permission of the copyright holder. All TVAS unpublished fieldwork reports are available on our website: www.tvas.co.uk/reports/reports.asp. Report edited/checked by: Steve Ford9 21.11.12 i Thames Valley Archaeological Services Ltd, 47–49 De Beauvoir Road, Reading RG1 5NR Tel.
    [Show full text]