Biogeography and Comparative Phylogenetics in Three Fish Species of the Eastern Guiana Shield

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Biogeography and Comparative Phylogenetics in Three Fish Species of the Eastern Guiana Shield Biogeography and Comparative Phylogenetics in Three Fish Species of the Eastern Guiana Shield by Bonnie Syme A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Master of Science Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology University of Toronto © Copyright by Bonnie Syme 2018 Biogeography and Comparative Phylogeography in Three Fish Species of the Eastern Guiana Shield Bonnie Syme Master of Science Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology University of Toronto 2018 ABSTRACT Comparative phylogeography allows us to investigate the relative importance of species specific biological characteristics versus shared historical conditions on species diversification in a region by studying sympatric populations of different taxa. To examine species specific versus shared evolutionary trajectories of freshwater fishes in the Guiana Shield region of South America, I analyzed and compared the population structure of three co-distributed species of the weakly- electric fish genus Gymnotus using mitochondrial gene sequences (cytochrome b). Population analyses indicate that, generally, Gymnotus species show a lack of contemporary gene flow between drainages. The phylogenetic relationship of fish populations between drainages, however, is not congruent among species. These results suggest that, while historical geological events such as the formation of drainages are important for the diversification of freshwater fish species, individual biological attributes, such as dispersal ability, likely play an influential role as well. ii Acknowledgments First and foremost, this study would not have been possible without the assistance of colleagues who collected and generously provided the tissue samples used in this thesis. Thank you to my supervisor, Dr. Nathan Lovejoy. Without his continuous support, positivity, and patience, in both the academic and personal aspects of this undertaking, I simply would not have been able to complete this project. His ability to both push me to my limits, as well as understand when I was uncomfortable with an aspect of the thesis, is something I appreciate beyond words. The timely completion of my thesis would also not have been possible without the support of the entire Lovejoy lab, whom I cannot thank enough. I owe a huge thanks to JP Fontenelle, for both helping to keep me sane with his endless wit and stories during long days in the office, and for being a boundless source of knowledge about all things phylogenetic and mapping and for always sharing that knowledge without hesitation; Ahmed Elbassiouny, who patiently, and with a sense of humour, managed to take me from a clueless student with zero lab experience to a genetic mastermind (almost) and without whom I never would have come out of my shell and interacted with anyone at all, thanks for all those coffee breaks Ahmed; and finally to Katherine Balasingham, for being a comrade in learning how things work in the Lovejoy lab as a fellow newcomer at the time and for being a source of femininity in a lab otherwise dominated by men. Thank you to my supervisory committee, Dr. Nicholas Mandrak and Dr. Marc Cadotte. Your feedback was invaluable. Lastly, thanks to my friends and family, who continuously supported and encouraged me throughout this entire process. Erik, who was always there when I got frustrated, listened to my lamentations, and took me for walks when I lost motivation; my mother who would always pick up the phone when I needed her and who kept me on track; my father, who will always my role-model; and my brother who could always remind me that I could do this. Without them I would be nowhere. iii Table of Contents Acknowledgments.......................................................................................................................... iii Table of Contents…………………………………………………………………………………iv List of Tables ................................................................................................................................. vi List of Figures ............................................................................................................................... vii Chapter 1: INTRODUCTION......................................................................................................... 1 1.1 South American biogeography and the Guiana shield ................................................................. 1 1.2 Comparative Phylogeography ..................................................................................................... 3 1.3 Gene flow and population genetic structure ................................................................................ 5 1.4 Range size and Genetic Structure ................................................................................................ 5 1.5 Cryptic species ............................................................................................................................ 6 1.6 Phylogeography and population structure of freshwater fishes of the Guianas ........................... 7 1.7 Study taxon ................................................................................................................................. 8 1.8 Objectives, Hypotheses and Predictions ...................................................................................... 9 1.9 Significance .............................................................................................................................. 11 Chapter 2: MATERIALS AND METHODS ................................................................................ 13 2.1 Mapping and Drainage Divisions .................................................................................................... 13 2.2 Taxon Sampling .............................................................................................................................. 14 2.3 DNA Extraction .............................................................................................................................. 15 2.4 Polymerase Chain Reactions and Sequencing ................................................................................. 16 2.5 Sequence Alignments and Matrices ................................................................................................ 17 2.6 Phylogenetic Analysis ..................................................................................................................... 18 2.7 Haplotype Analysis ......................................................................................................................... 18 2.8 Calculating Genetic and Geographic Distance Between Samples ................................................... 19 2.9 Statistical Correlation Analyses ...................................................................................................... 20 Chapter 3: RESULTS ................................................................................................................... 21 3.1 Phylogeny ....................................................................................................................................... 21 3.2 Population structure and phylogeography ....................................................................................... 21 3.2.1 G. carapo occidentalis ............................................................................................................. 22 3.2.2 G. carapo carapo ..................................................................................................................... 22 3.2.3 G. coropinae ............................................................................................................................ 23 3.2.4 Gymnotus anguillaris ............................................................................................................... 25 iv 3.3 Correlation between genetic distance and geographic distance ....................................................... 25 3.4 Cryptic species ................................................................................................................................ 27 Chapter 4: DISCUSSION ............................................................................................................. 28 4.1 Population structure of eastern Guiana Shield Gymnotus species ................................................... 28 4.2 Historical biogeography and comparative phylogeography of Gymnotus carapo, Gymnotus coropinae and Gymnotus anguillaris .................................................................................................... 34 4.3 Relationship between range size and population structure .............................................................. 38 4.4 Presence of cryptic species.............................................................................................................. 40 4.5 Conclusions, Limitations and Future Directions ............................................................................. 41 References ..................................................................................................................................... 44 Tables ............................................................................................................................................ 56 Figures……………………………………………………………………………………………64 v List of Tables Table 1. Gymnotus specimens included in this study…………………………………………57 Table 2. Primers used in this study……………………………………………………………63 Table 3. Summary statistics for study taxa……………………………………………………63
Recommended publications
  • Unravelling REDD+ Realities
    Understanding the Dialectic Disjuncture of Human-Nonhuman Relationships in Suriname Florian Albronda Msc Thesis 1 Unravelling REDD+ Realities: Understanding the Dialectic Disjuncture of Human-Nonhuman Relationships in Suriname Wageningen University Master Thesis 2017-2018 Course Code: SDC-80433 Master Program: International Development Studies Chair Group: Sociology of Development and Change Student: Florian Albronda Student Number: 920331010040 E-mail: [email protected] Supervisor: Robert Fletcher ANNOTATION: For this research data has been gathered through participant observation and interviews with various informants from REDD+ Suriname and indigenous and tribal communities. Informants did not engage in analysing these data and/or writing this thesis, which entails that they cannot be held responsible for the content. Additionally, for the sake of privacy, all informants have been anonymised. Image on front page courtesy of REDD+ Suriname 2 3 Content Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................................ 6 Abstract ............................................................................................................................................... 7 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................ 8 Chapter 1 - Theoretical and Conceptual Framework ....................................................................... 12 Neoliberal
    [Show full text]
  • Information Sheet on Ramsar Wetlands (RIS) – 2009-2012 Version Available for Download From
    Information Sheet on Ramsar Wetlands (RIS) – 2009-2012 version Available for download from http://www.ramsar.org/ris/key_ris_index.htm. Categories approved by Recommendation 4.7 (1990), as amended by Resolution VIII.13 of the 8th Conference of the Contracting Parties (2002) and Resolutions IX.1 Annex B, IX.6, IX.21 and IX. 22 of the 9th Conference of the Contracting Parties (2005). Notes for compilers: 1. The RIS should be completed in accordance with the attached Explanatory Notes and Guidelines for completing the Information Sheet on Ramsar Wetlands. Compilers are strongly advised to read this guidance before filling in the RIS. 2. Further information and guidance in support of Ramsar site designations are provided in the Strategic Framework and guidelines for the future development of the List of Wetlands of International Importance (Ramsar Wise Use Handbook 14, 3rd edition). A 4th edition of the Handbook is in preparation and will be available in 2009. 3. Once completed, the RIS (and accompanying map(s)) should be submitted to the Ramsar Secretariat. Compilers should provide an electronic (MS Word) copy of the RIS and, where possible, digital copies of all maps. 1. Name and address of the compiler of this form: FOR OFFICE USE ONLY. DD MM YY Beatriz de Aquino Ribeiro - Bióloga - Analista Ambiental / [email protected], (95) Designation date Site Reference Number 99136-0940. Antonio Lisboa - Geógrafo - MSc. Biogeografia - Analista Ambiental / [email protected], (95) 99137-1192. Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade - ICMBio Rua Alfredo Cruz, 283, Centro, Boa Vista -RR. CEP: 69.301-140 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Geological Society of America Bulletin
    Downloaded from gsabulletin.gsapubs.org on February 6, 2012 Geological Society of America Bulletin Sediment production and delivery in the Amazon River basin quantified by in situ −produced cosmogenic nuclides and recent river loads Hella Wittmann, Friedhelm von Blanckenburg, Laurence Maurice, Jean-Loup Guyot, Naziano Filizola and Peter W. Kubik Geological Society of America Bulletin 2011;123, no. 5-6;934-950 doi: 10.1130/B30317.1 Email alerting services click www.gsapubs.org/cgi/alerts to receive free e-mail alerts when new articles cite this article Subscribe click www.gsapubs.org/subscriptions/ to subscribe to Geological Society of America Bulletin Permission request click http://www.geosociety.org/pubs/copyrt.htm#gsa to contact GSA Copyright not claimed on content prepared wholly by U.S. government employees within scope of their employment. Individual scientists are hereby granted permission, without fees or further requests to GSA, to use a single figure, a single table, and/or a brief paragraph of text in subsequent works and to make unlimited copies of items in GSA's journals for noncommercial use in classrooms to further education and science. This file may not be posted to any Web site, but authors may post the abstracts only of their articles on their own or their organization's Web site providing the posting includes a reference to the article's full citation. GSA provides this and other forums for the presentation of diverse opinions and positions by scientists worldwide, regardless of their race, citizenship, gender, religion, or political viewpoint. Opinions presented in this publication do not reflect official positions of the Society.
    [Show full text]
  • Impact of the Amazon Tributaries on Major Flood in Óbidos
    Impact of the Amazon tributaries on major flood in Óbidos Josyane Ronchail, Jean-Loup Guyot, Jhan Carlo Espinoza Villar, Pascal Fraizy, Gérard Cochonneau, Juan Ordenez To cite this version: Josyane Ronchail, Jean-Loup Guyot, Jhan Carlo Espinoza Villar, Pascal Fraizy, Gérard Cochonneau, et al.. Impact of the Amazon tributaries on major flood in Óbidos. Procceedings of the Fifth FRIEND World Conference held at Havana, Cuba, November 2006), IAHS Publ. 308, 2006, 220-225, 2006. hal- 02987838 HAL Id: hal-02987838 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02987838 Submitted on 4 Nov 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Impact of the Amazon tributaries on major flood in Óbidos JOSYANE RONCHAIL Université Paris 7- Denis Diderot and Laboratoire d’Océanographie et du Climat (LOCEAN-IPSL), case 100, 4 Place Jussieu, 75005 Paris-France e-mail: [email protected] JEAN-LOUP GUYOT, JHAN CARLO ESPINOZA VILLAR, PASCAL FRAIZY Institut de Recherche pour le Développement and Universidad Agraria La Molina, casilla 18 1209, Lima 18, Peru. GERARD
    [Show full text]
  • Guianacara Dacrya, a New Species from the Rio Branco and Essequibo River Drainages of the Guiana Shield (Perciformes: Cichlidae)
    Neotropical Ichthyology, 9(1):87-96, 2011 Copyright © 2011 Sociedade Brasileira de Ictiologia Guianacara dacrya, a new species from the rio Branco and Essequibo River drainages of the Guiana Shield (Perciformes: Cichlidae) Jessica H. Arbour1 and Hernán López-Fernández1,2 A new species of Guianacara is described from tributaries of the Essequibo River and the rio Branco in Guyana and northern Brazil. Guianacara dacrya, new species, can be diagnosed from all congeners by the possession of a unique infraorbital stripe and by the shape of the lateral margin of the lower pharyngeal jaw tooth plate. Guianacara dacrya can be further distinguished from G. geayi, G. owroewefi, G. sphenozona and G. stergiosi by the possession of a thin midlateral bar, from G. cuyunii by the possession of dusky branchiostegal membranes and from G. oelemariensis by the possession of two supraneurals. This species differs from most congeners by the presence of white spots on the spiny portion of the dorsal fin, the placement of the midlateral spot, the presence of filaments on the dorsal, anal and in rare cases the caudal-fin and from at least the Venezuelan species by several morphometric variables. Guianacara dacrya is known from the Essequibo, Takutu and Ireng River basins of Guyana and possibly from the rio Uraricoera in the rio Branco basin in Brazil. A key to the species is provided. Describimos una especie nueva de Guianacara de las cuencas del río Essequibo y el río Branco en Guyana y el norte de Brasil. Guianacara dacrya, especie nueva, puede distinguirse de todos sus congéneres por la presencia de una barra infraorbital modificada y por la forma única del margen lateral de la placa dentada de la mandíbula faríngea inferior.
    [Show full text]
  • A Rapid Biological Assessment of the Upper Palumeu River Watershed (Grensgebergte and Kasikasima) of Southeastern Suriname
    Rapid Assessment Program A Rapid Biological Assessment of the Upper Palumeu River Watershed (Grensgebergte and Kasikasima) of Southeastern Suriname Editors: Leeanne E. Alonso and Trond H. Larsen 67 CONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL - SURINAME CONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL GLOBAL WILDLIFE CONSERVATION ANTON DE KOM UNIVERSITY OF SURINAME THE SURINAME FOREST SERVICE (LBB) NATURE CONSERVATION DIVISION (NB) FOUNDATION FOR FOREST MANAGEMENT AND PRODUCTION CONTROL (SBB) SURINAME CONSERVATION FOUNDATION THE HARBERS FAMILY FOUNDATION Rapid Assessment Program A Rapid Biological Assessment of the Upper Palumeu River Watershed RAP (Grensgebergte and Kasikasima) of Southeastern Suriname Bulletin of Biological Assessment 67 Editors: Leeanne E. Alonso and Trond H. Larsen CONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL - SURINAME CONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL GLOBAL WILDLIFE CONSERVATION ANTON DE KOM UNIVERSITY OF SURINAME THE SURINAME FOREST SERVICE (LBB) NATURE CONSERVATION DIVISION (NB) FOUNDATION FOR FOREST MANAGEMENT AND PRODUCTION CONTROL (SBB) SURINAME CONSERVATION FOUNDATION THE HARBERS FAMILY FOUNDATION The RAP Bulletin of Biological Assessment is published by: Conservation International 2011 Crystal Drive, Suite 500 Arlington, VA USA 22202 Tel : +1 703-341-2400 www.conservation.org Cover photos: The RAP team surveyed the Grensgebergte Mountains and Upper Palumeu Watershed, as well as the Middle Palumeu River and Kasikasima Mountains visible here. Freshwater resources originating here are vital for all of Suriname. (T. Larsen) Glass frogs (Hyalinobatrachium cf. taylori) lay their
    [Show full text]
  • Cop14 Prop. 13 (Rev
    CoP14 Prop. 13 (Rev. 1) CONVENTION ON INTERNATIONAL TRADE IN ENDANGERED SPECIES OF WILD FAUNA AND FLORA ____________________ Fourteenth meeting of the Conference of the Parties The Hague (Netherlands), 3-15 June 2007 CONSIDERATION OF PROPOSALS FOR AMENDMENT OF APPENDICES I AND II A. Proposal Transfer of the population of black caiman Melanosuchus niger of Brazil from Appendix I to Appendix II of CITES, in accordance with Article II, paragraph 2. a), of the Convention and with Resolution Conf. 9.24 (Rev. CoP13) Annex 4, paragraph A. 2. b). B. Proponent Brazil C. Supporting statement Transferring the black caiman from CITES Appendix I to Appendix II will not harm or result in risk to wild populations because: a) the black caiman is abundant and widely distributed within its range in Brazil; b) regarding international trade, the Brazilian CITES Management Authority has effective mechanisms to control all segments of the production chain and, under the controlling measures, it will be advantageous to act legally rather than illegally; c) harvest will occur only in Sustainable Use Conservation Units, which will have their specific management plans that may range from no harvest to a maximum of 10 % of the estimated population size; and d) there is an efficient system to monitor the natural populations and their habitats and to ensure that conservation goals through sustainable use can be achieved. More broadly, in accordance with Resolution Conf. 13.2, each of the 14 Addis Ababa Principles and Guidelines for the Sustainable Use of Biodiversity (see CBD website), will be closely observed. 1. Taxonomy 1.1 Class: Reptilia 1.2 Order: Crocodylia 1.3 Family: Alligatoridae 1.4 Genus, species or subspecies, including author and year: Melanosuchus niger, Spix 1825 1.5 Scientific synonyms: --- CoP14 Prop.
    [Show full text]
  • Impact of the Amazon Tributaries on Major Floods at Obidos
    Climate Variability and Change—Hydrological Impacts (Proceedings of the Fifth FRIEND World Conference 220 held at Havana, Cuba, November 2006), IAHS Publ. 308, 2006. Impact of the Amazon tributaries on major floods at Óbidos JOSYANE RONCHAIL1, JEAN-LOUP GUYOT2, JHAN CARLO ESPINOZA VILLAR2, PASCAL FRAIZY2, GÉRARD COCHONNEAU3, EURIDES DE OLIVEIRA4, NAZIANO FILIZOLA4 5 & JUAN JULIO ORDENEZ 1 Université Paris 7- Denis Diderot and Laboratoire d’Océanographie et du Climat (LOCEAN-IPSL), case 100, 4 Place Jussieu, F-75005 Paris-France [email protected] 2 Institut de Recherche pour le Développement and Universidad Agraria La Molina, casilla 18 1209, Lima 18, Peru 3 Maison de la Télédétection, 500 rue J.F. Breton, F-34093 Montpellier Cedex 05, France 4 Agência Nacional de Águas, Setor Policia, CEP 70610-200, Brasília, Brasil 5 Servício Nacional de Meteorología y Hidrología, Cahuide 785, Lima 11, Peru Abstract Major flooding of the Amazon river (with discharge over 250 000 m3 s-1) is analysed, using daily discharge at (a) Óbidos, the lowest gauged station on the Amazon River, 800 km from the ocean, (b) six gauge stations located on the main tributaries and characterized by different discharge regimes. During the 1984–2001 period major flooding on the main stream was related to the following features: (a) greater than usual high water in the Solimões River, the largest tributary, (b) delayed discharge peaks in the southwestern tributaries and the Amazonas River (Peru) and/or advanced discharge peaks on the Negro-Branco River, (c) unusual February–April discharge peaks in the western and northwestern tributaries, particularly in the Negro River.
    [Show full text]
  • From Roraima, Brazil: Species Composition, Distribution, and New Records
    14 1 21 ANNOTATED LIST OF SPECIES Check List 14 (1): 21–35 https://doi.org/10.15560/14.1.21 Freshwater shrimps (Crustacea, Decapoda, Caridea, Dendrobranchiata) from Roraima, Brazil: species composition, distribution, and new records Maria Aparecida Laurindo dos Santos,1 Patrícia Macedo de Castro,2, 3 Célio Magalhães4 1 Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Biologia de Água Doce e Pesca Interior. Av. André Araújo, 2936 - Petrópolis, 69067-375 Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil. 2 Universidade Estadual de Roraima, Pró-Reitoria de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação. Rua Sete de Setembro, 231 - Canarinho, 69306-530, Boa Vista, RR, Brazil. 3 Museu Integrado de Roraima/IACTI-RR. Av. Brigadeiro Eduardo Gomes, 2868 – Pq. Anauá, 69305-010, Boa Vista, RR, Brazil. 4 Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia, Coordenação de Biodiversidade. Av. André Araújo, 2936 - Petrópolis, 69067-375, Manaus, AM, Brazil Corresponding author: Célio Magalhães, [email protected] Abstract This work provides an update on the species composition and distribution of freshwater shrimps from the state of Roraima, Brazil, based on material deposited in the Brazilian collections of the Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (Manaus) and the Museu Integrado de Roraima (Boa Vista). A total of 12 species (1 Sergestidae, 3 Eury- rhynchidae, and 8 Palaemonidae) are listed, of which 7 (Acetes paraguayensis Hansen, 1919; Euryrhynchus ama- zoniensis Tiefenbacher, 1978; E. burchelli Calman, 1907; E. wrzesniowskii Miers, 1877; Palaemon yuna Carvalho, Magalhães & Mantelatto, 2014; Pseudopalaemon chryseus Kensley & Walker, 1982; and Ps. gouldingi Kensley & Walker, 1982) are recorded for the first time from the state of Roraima.
    [Show full text]
  • Contemporary Development in the 'Three Guianas'
    Caribbean Studies ISSN: 0008-6533 [email protected] Instituto de Estudios del Caribe Puerto Rico Hoefte, Rosemarijn; Bishop, Matthew; Clegg, Peter STILL LONELY AFTER ALL THESE YEARS? CONTEMPORARY DEVELOPMENT IN THE ‘THREE GUIANAS’ Caribbean Studies, vol. 43, núm. 2, julio-diciembre, 2015, pp. 83-113 Instituto de Estudios del Caribe San Juan, Puerto Rico Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=39249077003 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative stILL L one Ly afte R aLL these yea Rs?... 83 STILL L ONELY A FTER A LL T HESE Y EARS ? CONTEMPORARY D EVELOPMENT IN THE ‘T HREE G UIANAS ’ Rosemarijn Hoefte Matthew Bishop Peter Clegg abstract Guyana, Suriname and French Guiana have traditionally been seen as isolated: from each other; from the Caribbean with which they are socially and culturally contiguous; and also from the South American continent in which they are geographically situated. Moreover, divided by language and relationships of varying intensity with their former colonisers, very little research exists which analyzes their develop- ment predicament collectively. This article seeks to overcome some of these deficiencies. It shows how similar processes of change internally, regionally and globally are provoking new patterns of development and engagement with the world in all three Guianas. The central conclu- sion of the paper points towards the need for a new research agenda which focuses on these unique territories as distinctive prisms through which to view various dimensions of contemporary globalisation.
    [Show full text]
  • Suriname Migration Profile Profile Migration Suriname Migration Suriname
    Suriname Migration Profile A study on emigration from, and immigration into Suriname SURINAME MIGRATION PROFILE A study on emigration from, and immigration into Suriname into and immigration from, on emigration A study PROFILE SURINAME MIGRATION This project is implemented by: Financed by the European Union International Organization for Migration Regional Coordination Office 87 Carmichael Street, South Cummingsburg, Georgetown, Guyana Phone: (592) 2253745 | Fax: (592) 2273675 E-mail: [email protected] Financed by the European Union The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the International Organization for Migration (IOM). The designations employed and the presentation of material throughout this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of IOM concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or of this authorities, or concerning its frontiers or boundaries. Omissions and errors remain the responsibility of the authors. IOM is committed to the principle that humane and orderly migration benefits migrants and society. As an intergovernmental organization, IOM acts with its partners in the international community to assist in meeting the operational challenges of migration; advance understanding of migrants’ issues; encourage social and economic development through migration; and uphold the human dignity and well-being of migrants. Publisher: International Organization for Migration Regional Coordination Office
    [Show full text]
  • A Rapid Biological Assessment of the Kwamalasamutu Region, Suriname August-September 2010 Preliminary Report
    A Rapid Biological Assessment of the Kwamalasamutu Region, Suriname August-September 2010 Preliminary Report A collaboration of: Conservation International – Suriname, Rapid Assessment Program (RAP), Center for Environmental Leadership in Business (CELB), Alcoa Foundation Preliminary report produced and distributed January 24, 2011 by Conservation International all photos ©Piotr Naskrecki 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgments……………………………………………………… 4 Participants and Authors…………………………………………….… 5 Map………………………………………………………………….…... 9 Introduction to the RAP Survey………………………………….….… 10 Description of RAP Survey Sites………………………………….….... 11 Summary of Preliminary Results by Taxonomic Group…………… 12 Summary of Preliminary Conservation Recommendations……….. 16 Preliminary Reports Water Quality…………………………………………………………… 20 Plants…………………….…….………………………………………… 22 Aquatic Beetles…………………………………………………………. 28 Dung Beetles……………………………………………………………. 31 Ants……………………………………………………………………… 36 Katydids ……………………………………………………................... 38 Dragonflies and Damselflies……………………………….…………… 43 Fishes……………………………………………………………………. 47 Reptiles and Amphibians…………………………………..................... 50 Birds........…………………………………………………….................. 51 Small Mammals………………………………………………………… 56 Large Mammals………………………………………………………… 59 Appendices: Preliminary Data and Species Lists Appendix 1. Water Quality Data………………………………................... 64 Appendix 2. Plants………………………………………………………….. 67 Appendix 3. Aquatic Beetles……………………………………………….. 70 Appendix 4. Dung Beetles………………………………………………….. 72
    [Show full text]