Tillicum Area Structure Plan

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Tillicum Area Structure Plan Tillicum Area Structure Plan Prepared by: Ross W. Sharp & Associates Ltd. In partnership with: Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 3 1.1 PURPOSE ........................................................................................................................................ 3 1.2 POLICY CONTEXT OF THE AREA STRUCTURE PLAN ................................................................................... 3 1.3 PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT PROGRAM ...................................................................................................... 19 2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION .................................................................................................................... 23 3.0 FUTURE LAND USE CONCEPT PLAN .............................................................................................. 30 3.1 AGRICULTURE ................................................................................................................................ 31 3.2 ENVIRONMENTAL ........................................................................................................................... 34 3.3 RECREATIONAL ............................................................................................................................... 38 3.4 EXISTING RESIDENTIAL ..................................................................................................................... 44 3.5 FUTURE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITIES ........................................................................... 49 3.6 GRAVEL EXTRACTION ...................................................................................................................... 55 4.0 SERVICING ................................................................................................................................ 57 4.1 POTABLE WATER ............................................................................................................................ 57 4.2 SANITARY SEWER ........................................................................................................................... 59 4.3 STORM DRAINAGE .......................................................................................................................... 63 4.4 ROADS AND WALKWAYS .................................................................................................................. 65 4.5 SHALLOW UTILITIES [POWER, GAS, TELECOMMUNICATIONS] ................................................................... 71 5.0 FIRE PROTECTION ..................................................................................................................... 72 Figures FIGURE 1 : EXISTING LAND USE MAP .................................................................................................................... 15 FIGURE 2: LOCATION MAP .................................................................................................................................. 24 FIGURE 3: ASP AREA MAP AS PER RFP .................................................................................................................. 25 FIGURE 4: TOPOGRAPHIC MAP ............................................................................................................................ 28 FIGURE 5: FUTURE LAND USE CONCEPT PLAN ......................................................................................................... 30 FIGURE 6: PHASING PLAN ................................................................................................................................... 54 FIGURE 7 : SANITARY SEWER AND WATER MAIN CONCEPT ........................................................................................ 62 FIGURE 8: STORMWATER RENTENTION POND ......................................................................................................... 65 FIGURE 9 : ROADS AND PATHWAYS ....................................................................................................................... 68 FIGURE 10: ROADWAY CROSS SECTIONS ................................................................................................................ 69 Tillicum ASP Page 2 1.0 Introduction 1.1 Purpose The purpose of the Tillicum Area Structure Plan is to provide Camrose County with practical recommendations respecting the expansion opportunities of Paradise Resort & the Hamlet of Tillicum Beach while preserving the environmental integrity of Driedmeat Lake and the Battle River Basin. The area structure plan focuses on providing an overview of the existing characteristics and issues under the general land use categories of Environment, Recreation, existing Residential/Cottage, Future Development Opportunities, Servicing, Mineral Deposits and Fire Safety. A set of objectives will be provided for each land use category followed by a series of recommendations as to how to best satisfy these objectives. The Tillicum Area Structure Plan is the last in a series of ASP’s that have been completed for the Hamlets & Lake Resorts within the County. 1.2 Policy Context of the Area Structure Plan The proposed Tillicum Area Structure Plan must comply with the Municipal Government Act and the various policy documents that the County has in place including the Municipal Development Plan and the Land Use Bylaw. 1.2.1 Municipal Government Act The Tillicum Area Structure Plan has met the requirements of the MGA. The Act enables the County to adopt an area structure plan that provides a framework for the future subdivision and development of land within the ASP area. Sections 633,636,638 & 692 of the Act deal specifically with area structure plans stating that these plans must describe: 1. the sequence of development proposed for the area 2. the land uses proposed for the area, either generally or with respect to specific parts of the area Tillicum ASP Page 3 3. the density of the population proposed 4. the general location of major transportation routes and public utilities 5. other matters council considers necessary The Act provides the general public and organizations such as School Boards the opportunity to participate in the planning process by requiring an area structure plan to be adopted through a Public Hearing and Bylaw process. The Municipal Government Act also requires the ASP to conform to the County’s Municipal Development Plan (MDP) which was adopted by Bylaw 1052 in April of 2004. 1.2.2 Municipal Development Plan (MDP) The County’s MDP which was adopted in 2004 provides guidance to manage growth and development within Camrose County. We have selected those principles and policies that are applicable to the Tillicum ASP for review and comment. Development Priorities: Council’s overriding priority is to maintain a sustainable economy and a healthy environment. Development which meets this test will be welcome. Development which fails this test will be rejected. The future of the County of Camrose lies with a strong farm economy, and Council will do whatever is necessary to support farming as an industry and a way of life. Other land uses may not be allowed if they are incompatible with farming. …Council will ensure that its decisions do not stand in the way of growth of its urban neighbors. Subject to these overriding priorities, Council will support diversification of the economy into non agricultural activities, including non-farm residences… resource development and recreation Section 1: Agriculture Agriculture is the backbone of the local economy and Council will give all necessary support to the Industry. Council will support agriculture by securing its land base and by ensuring that farmers have the right to farm without unnecessary interference. Tillicum ASP Page 4 The pertinent MDP Agricultural Policies that are applicable to the Tillicum ASP lie under the exception policies which prioritize other land uses in specific situations. These include: Policy 1.9 The protection of farm land will not be used to prevent the logical and economic expansion of ….existing Hamlets Policy 1.10 Land may be zoned to allow other uses in agricultural areas if they are compatible….. Policy 1.11 …good farm land may be rezoned for recreational and residential use adjacent to water bodies Policy 1.12 Landowners are encouraged to keep natural vegetation on land next to rivers and streams. The Tillicum ASP has maintained the agricultural land uses on the upper bench lands of the hamlet where cereal and forage crops continue to be produced. These cultivated lands, while limited in size, represent an ideal holding zone until long range expansion of the Hamlet becomes feasible. Specific objectives and recommendations pertaining to the “right to farm” are put forward under this land use within the ASP. The MDP contains a number of other agricultural related policies dealing with single parcel subdivisions in agricultural areas, intensive animal operations and rural non-farm residences in agricultural areas. (see MDP Policy Sections 2 thru 4). Section 5: Rural industry and Commerce The vast majority of these policies would not be applicable to the Tillicum ASP with the exception of those policies dealing with Home Based Businesses Policies 5.6 thru to 5.8. Policy 5.6 Home businesses will be allowed provided they have no significant off site effects. Rules maybe tighter in multi lot residential subdivisions …. Policy 5.7 If a home business will have significant off site effects,
Recommended publications
  • North Saskatchewan Region Surface Water Quality Management Framework
    North Saskatchewan Region Surface Water Quality Management Framework A surface water quality management framework (framework) is being developed for the North Saskatchewan Region. The framework establishes an approach for monitoring and managing the cumulative impacts of human activities on water quality in the North Saskatchewan and Battle rivers. Cumulative effects management was first introduced in the North Saskatchewan Region with the Water Management Framework for the Industrial Heartland and Capital Region, which was developed in 2008 to address anticipated development in the Capital Region. At that time, government and stakeholders committed to maintaining or improving surface water quality in the stretch of the North Saskatchewan River from Devon to Pakan. Stakeholder and indigenous engagement on a Surface Water Quality Management Framework began in 2015 as a component of the North Saskatchewan Regional Plan, and continued in 2018. The current engagement will build on these initiatives and processes. Figure 1: The North Saskatchewan and Battle River Watersheds Surface Water Quality Pressures Surface Water Quality Status Rivers in the North Saskatchewan Region are relied upon for Many aspects of water quality in the North Saskatchewan source water for drinking, livestock watering, recreation, Region have improved in recent decades due to improved industry, providing healthy aquatic habitat and supporting management practices, especially wastewater treatment. traditional land use activities. However, pressure from Despite these advances, concerns for water quality in the different human activities can impact surface water quality in North Saskatchewan and Battle rivers include low dissolved the region. oxygen in the winter, nutrient enrichment, trace metals, and high sedimentation. Continuing efforts under the Water Population growth drives urban development, recreational Management Framework for the Industrial Heartland and growth, industrial growth and intensification of agricultural Capital Region are working to address these issues.
    [Show full text]
  • The Methodists' Great 1869 Camp Meeting and Aboriginal Conservation Strategies in the North Saskatchewan River Valley
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Great Plains Quarterly Great Plains Studies, Center for 2009 The Methodists' Great 1869 Camp Meeting and Aboriginal Conservation Strategies in The North Saskatchewan River Valley George Colpitts Department of the University of Calgary, in Alberta, Canada Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/greatplainsquarterly Part of the Other International and Area Studies Commons Colpitts, George, "The Methodists' Great 1869 Camp Meeting and Aboriginal Conservation Strategies in The North Saskatchewan River Valley" (2009). Great Plains Quarterly. 1170. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/greatplainsquarterly/1170 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Great Plains Studies, Center for at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Great Plains Quarterly by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. THE METHODISTS' GREAT 1869 CAMP MEETING AND ABORIGINAL CONSERVATION STRATEGIES IN THE NORTH SASKATCHEWAN RIVER VALLEY GEORGE COLPITTS George McDougall, chairman of the Methodist gent of Wesleyan Methodists and their Native Missions to the Indians of the Northwest affiliates from Fort Edmonton, Pigeon Lake, Territories, kept a large, black book in which he Lac Ste. Anne, Lac La Biche, and Whitefish jotted sermon notes, references to classical and Lake-all located on the most northern and biblical literature and sometimes simply his itin­ westerly fringes of the northern Great Plains. eraries by horseback from Victoria, the primary Their expedition and other hunts joined by Methodist mission in the far British northwest. Protestant or Roman Catholic missions help Under the "s" tab and labeled "Saskatchewan," identify some of the strategies of competition he noted repeatedly in the 1860s the food crisis and cooperation emerging in the western boreal facing North Saskatchewan residents.
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 Municipal Codes
    2017 Municipal Codes Updated December 22, 2017 Municipal Services Branch 17th Floor Commerce Place 10155 - 102 Street Edmonton, Alberta T5J 4L4 Phone: 780-427-2225 Fax: 780-420-1016 E-mail: [email protected] 2017 MUNICIPAL CHANGES STATUS CHANGES: 0315 - The Village of Thorsby became the Town of Thorsby (effective January 1, 2017). NAME CHANGES: 0315- The Town of Thorsby (effective January 1, 2017) from Village of Thorsby. AMALGAMATED: FORMATIONS: DISSOLVED: 0038 –The Village of Botha dissolved and became part of the County of Stettler (effective September 1, 2017). 0352 –The Village of Willingdon dissolved and became part of the County of Two Hills (effective September 1, 2017). CODE NUMBERS RESERVED: 4737 Capital Region Board 0522 Metis Settlements General Council 0524 R.M. of Brittania (Sask.) 0462 Townsite of Redwood Meadows 5284 Calgary Regional Partnership STATUS CODES: 01 Cities (18)* 15 Hamlet & Urban Services Areas (396) 09 Specialized Municipalities (5) 20 Services Commissions (71) 06 Municipal Districts (64) 25 First Nations (52) 02 Towns (108) 26 Indian Reserves (138) 03 Villages (87) 50 Local Government Associations (22) 04 Summer Villages (51) 60 Emergency Districts (12) 07 Improvement Districts (8) 98 Reserved Codes (5) 08 Special Areas (3) 11 Metis Settlements (8) * (Includes Lloydminster) December 22, 2017 Page 1 of 13 CITIES CODE CITIES CODE NO. NO. Airdrie 0003 Brooks 0043 Calgary 0046 Camrose 0048 Chestermere 0356 Cold Lake 0525 Edmonton 0098 Fort Saskatchewan 0117 Grande Prairie 0132 Lacombe 0194 Leduc 0200 Lethbridge 0203 Lloydminster* 0206 Medicine Hat 0217 Red Deer 0262 Spruce Grove 0291 St. Albert 0292 Wetaskiwin 0347 *Alberta only SPECIALIZED MUNICIPALITY CODE SPECIALIZED MUNICIPALITY CODE NO.
    [Show full text]
  • Communities Within Specialized and Rural Municipalities (May 2019)
    Communities Within Specialized and Rural Municipalities Updated May 24, 2019 Municipal Services Branch 17th Floor Commerce Place 10155 - 102 Street Edmonton, Alberta T5J 4L4 Phone: 780-427-2225 Fax: 780-420-1016 E-mail: [email protected] COMMUNITIES WITHIN SPECIALIZED AND RURAL MUNICIPAL BOUNDARIES COMMUNITY STATUS MUNICIPALITY Abee Hamlet Thorhild County Acadia Valley Hamlet Municipal District of Acadia No. 34 ACME Village Kneehill County Aetna Hamlet Cardston County ALBERTA BEACH Village Lac Ste. Anne County Alcomdale Hamlet Sturgeon County Alder Flats Hamlet County of Wetaskiwin No. 10 Aldersyde Hamlet Foothills County Alhambra Hamlet Clearwater County ALIX Village Lacombe County ALLIANCE Village Flagstaff County Altario Hamlet Special Areas Board AMISK Village Municipal District of Provost No. 52 ANDREW Village Lamont County Antler Lake Hamlet Strathcona County Anzac Hamlet Regional Municipality of Wood Buffalo Ardley Hamlet Red Deer County Ardmore Hamlet Municipal District of Bonnyville No. 87 Ardrossan Hamlet Strathcona County ARGENTIA BEACH Summer Village County of Wetaskiwin No. 10 Armena Hamlet Camrose County ARROWWOOD Village Vulcan County Ashmont Hamlet County of St. Paul No. 19 ATHABASCA Town Athabasca County Atmore Hamlet Athabasca County Balzac Hamlet Rocky View County BANFF Town Improvement District No. 09 (Banff) BARNWELL Village Municipal District of Taber BARONS Village Lethbridge County BARRHEAD Town County of Barrhead No. 11 BASHAW Town Camrose County BASSANO Town County of Newell BAWLF Village Camrose County Beauvallon Hamlet County of Two Hills No. 21 Beaver Crossing Hamlet Municipal District of Bonnyville No. 87 Beaver Lake Hamlet Lac La Biche County Beaver Mines Hamlet Municipal District of Pincher Creek No. 9 Beaverdam Hamlet Municipal District of Bonnyville No.
    [Show full text]
  • Camrose 1986 Mar a to C
    Calgary Reception Archive Copy Please Return 5 wetasKiwin &area USE THE YELLOW PAGES INDEX yellow pages r. I TOTAL COMMUNICATION.S ^ ' Telk^mmunicatiofiS march 15,1985 area ciie.40al A mmber of T Canada' 4 AGi Tefecommunications A member of Telecom Canada mii / M 22 ALDER FLATS Athabasca UniversityAttiabasca - Call '0' County Of Wetaskiwin No 10 Wetaskiwin GOVERNMENT OF ALBERTA (Contd) Operator (NoCtarge) & AsitFor .... Zenith 22273 -Call '0' Operator (No Charge) & Ask MANPOWER Examination Requests- Cal '0' Operator(No For Zenith 22270 Career Information Hotfine-Call'0' Operator Ctiarge) & Ask For Zenith 07164 D&N FOODS Buckiake 388-3842 (No Ctiarge) & Ask For Zenith 22140 AubinJudy 388-2275 Danyluk Alex Box26 388-3786 SOCIAL SERVICES ft COMMUNITV ALDER FLATS Autocal Edmonton - Call '0' Operator (No S— also Rocky Mountain Housa Darroch John 388-3095 HEALTH Ctiarge) & Ask For Zenith 22249 Dennis Norman 388-2405 for other customers Child Abuse Hot line 24 Hr Emergency - Bachand Tilda 388-3794 Devaney Tom 388-2479 Call '0' Operator (No Charge) & Ask located in this area. Bagley John Buckiake 388-2374 Dille Howard 388-3748 For Zenith 1234 For dotaiM ACT Listing*: Bailey Eric BoxSlB 388-3010 Dodman Norman 388-2308 Widow's Pension Program - Call '0' SM Pags "1" Doty Wifliam Buckiake 388-2203 Operator(NoCharge) &AskForZenith 22001 SERVICE CALLS BAKER FUNERAL Drader A C Box218 388-2295 TOURISM ft SMALL BUSINESS DIRECT DISTANCE DIAUNG 1 Drader Fred J Buckiake 388-3931 Travel Alberta LONG DISTANCE DIAUNG 0 CHAPEL LTD Drayton Valley Ambulance (1981)
    [Show full text]
  • Shirley Mcclellan Regional Water System Business Plan
    Shirley McClellan Regional Water System Business Plan 2013 Plan Update Draft 1.0 August 16, 2013 Commission Members Camrose County Village of Consort Lacombe County Village of Donalda County of Paintearth No. 18 Village of Halkirk County of Stettler No. 6 Village of Rosalind Town of Castor Village of Veteran Town of Coronation Summer Village of Rochon Sands Village of Bawlf Summer Village of White Sands Village of Big Valley Special Area No. 2, 3 and 4. Changes from 2011 Plan marked in Grey Highlight and Strikethrough Shirley McClellan Regional Water System – Business Plan 2013 Plan Update – Draft 1 – August 16, 2013 Table of Contents Table of Contents ........................................................................................................................................ 2 Executive Summary .................................................................................................................................... 5 1. Introduction.................................................................................................................................... 12 1.1 Definitions ...................................................................................................................................... 12 1.2 Project Background ..................................................................................................................... 12 1.2.1 Water Needs and Challenges of Supply .......................................................................... 12 1.2.2 Regional Approach and Development
    [Show full text]
  • Camrose County Tourism
    Joseph 833 SECONDARY Lake Miquelon 5 Lake (! 623 SECONDARY µ 21 (!26 623 Camrose County SECONDARY (!20 (!35 3755-43 Ave. Kingman 17 Hay Lakes 834 Camrose, AB (! SECONDARY 21 50 617 617 (! SECONDARY SECONDARY T4V 3S8 Big 833 SECONDARY Hay Round Hill Ph. (780)672-4446 Lake (!24 Public Works:(780)672-4449 Fax:(780)672-1008 www.county.camrose.ab.ca 616 616 Facebook: Camrose County SECO NDARY SECONDARY !40 Armena Demay ( Twitter: @CamroseCounty Lake 854 SECONDARY 21 833 SECONDARY 834 (!7 SECONDARY Bittern Lake (!33 (!2 13 26 8 31 26 26 Camrose (! (! (!16 11 (! ^ 13 834 Bittern Lake 32 SECONDARY (!34 13 (! 29 21 (! (!38 Ohaton 854 (!22 SECONDARY (!37 (!48 (!41 56 (!42 13 (!10 (!55 (!39 13 Duhamel (!12 (! Bawlf D r ie d m (!25 e a t 49 L (! !6 a ( k e 854 SE 13 New Norway (!51 (!27 CONDARY (!21 Tillicum (!18 (!4 6 56 Kelsey (!19 21 611 611 609 SECONDARY SECONDARY SECONDARY 609 Edberg SECONDARY (!23 609 14 609 609 SECONDARY (! (!4 SECONDARY Rosalind SECONDARY (!56 Ferintosh 30 (! (!15 (!28 Red (!43 Deer Lake 854 SECONDARY 56 Meeting Creek (!36 53 21 (!44 Campgrounds Attractions !(3 Country Nine Golf Course Community Halls !(25 Alberta's Littlest Airport !(4 Double Dam Golf Course (!3 !(8 Avonroy Hall !(26 Bashaw Fire Museum & Majestic Theatre !(43 Ferry Point Camp Site !(9 Bashaw Community Hall !(27 Camrose County Nature Conservation Centre !(44 Meeting Creek Camp Site !(10 Bawlf Community Hall !(28 Down Home Bed & Breakfast !(5 Miquelon Hills Golf Course 54 (!9 !53 (! ( 11 29 Eastside Greenhouse Miquelon Lake Provincial Park 56 !( Bittern Lake
    [Show full text]
  • Supporting Your Community for Generations
    Hay bale art will be a HAviNæ A Hay Day fun new aspect to enjoy Contest entry along the route of Check out PRAIRIE FUN DAYS on Facebook CONTEST RULES: To enter the contest, complete the entry form and submit it to Camrose Railway Station, Box 1174, Camrose, AB T4V 1X2 by midnight on August 16, 2013. The exact entry title must be placed on or beside all FUN DAYS ¤‚⁄‹ bale art creations with legible lettering a minimum of 15 cm (6 inches) high. All entries must be on the Saturday, August 24, North Route 2013 mapped Prairie Fun Days route and be Sunday, August 25, South Route family-friendly. By submitting the entry form, you agree to participate in the contest pre- and post-publicity HAviNæ A Hay Day CONTEST and allow the Canadian Northern Society permission to publish or publically display pictures and/or videos Your sculpture can be constructed out of bales; round or square, large or small, hay, straw or green feed. Other materials of your bale art now and in the future. Judging will be such as fabric, metal, paint, etc. may be incorporated into your bale art. Your imagination and the sky are your limits. completed by the public participating in the Prairie Fun Great prizes: 1st Organization: $400 UFA gift certificate; 1st Individual/Family: $200 gift certificate donated by UFA Days tour (one ballot per adult, age 18 and over, per and framed print, Time to Move On, donated by Guest House Gallery, Ferintosh; 2nd Individual/Family: $100 gift certificate manned site destination attended.) donated by UFA and framed print, Country Greeting, donated by Camrose Heritage Railway Station and Park; Honourable Mention: prizes supplied by Battle River Implements Ltd., and Camrose Dynamic Sales & Service Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Trophic State of Alberta Lakes Based on Average Total Phosphorus
    Created Feb 2013 TROPHIC STATE OF ALBERTA LAKES Based On Average (May-October) Total Phosphorus Concentrations Total Phosphorus (µg/L) 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 * Adamson Lake Alix Lake * Amisk Lake * Angling Lake Oligotrophic * ‡ Antler Lake Arm Lake (Low Productivity) * Astotin Lake (<10 µg/L) * ‡ Athabasca (Lake) - Off Delta Baptiste Lake - North Basin Baptiste Lake - South Basin * ‡ Bare Creek Res. Mesotrophic * ‡ Barrier Lake ‡ Battle Lake (Moderate Productivity) * † Battle River Res. (Forestburg) (10 - 35 µg/L) Beartrap Lake Beauvais Lake Beaver Lake * Bellevue Lake Eutrophic * † Big Lake - East Basin * † Big Lake - West Basin (High Productivity) * Blackfalds Lake (35 - 100 µg/L) * † Blackmud Lake * ‡ Blood Indian Res. Bluet (South Garnier Lake) ‡ Bonnie Lake Hypereutrophic † Borden Lake * ‡ Bourque Lake (Very High Productivity) ‡ Buck Lake (>100 µg/L) Buffalo Lake - Main Basin Buffalo Lake - Secondary Bay * † Buffalo Lake (By Boyle) † Burntstick Lake Calling Lake * † Capt Eyre Lake † Cardinal Lake * ‡ Carolside Res. - Berry Creek Res. † Chain Lakes Res. - North Basin † Chain Lakes Res.- South Basin Chestermere Lake * † Chickakoo Lake * † Chickenhill Lake * Chin Coulee Res. * Clairmont Lake Clear (Barns) Lake Clear Lake ‡ Coal Lake * ‡ Cold Lake - English Bay ‡ Cold Lake - West Side ‡ Cooking Lake † Cow Lake * Crawling Valley Res. Crimson Lake Crowsnest Lake * † Cutbank Lake Dillberry Lake * Driedmeat Lake ‡ Eagle Lake ‡ Elbow Lake Elkwater Lake Ethel Lake * Fawcett Lake * † Fickle Lake * † Figure Eight Lake * Fishing Lake * Flyingshot Lake * Fork Lake * ‡ Fox Lake Res. Frog Lake † Garner Lake Garnier Lake (North) * George Lake * † Ghost Res. - Inside Bay * † Ghost Res. - Inside Breakwater ‡ Ghost Res. - Near Cochrane * Gleniffer Lake (Dickson Res.) * † Glenmore Res.
    [Show full text]
  • PP2 - Lakes, Reservoirs and Ponds Waterbody Waterbody Detail Season Bait WALL NRPK YLPR LKWH BURB Trout Total L = Bait Allowed Arm Lake OPEN MAY 15 to MAR
    Legend: As examples, ‘3 over 63 cm’ indicates a possession and size limit of ‘3 fish each over 63 cm’ or ‘10 fish’ indicates a possession limit of 10 for that species of any size. An empty cell indicates the species is not likely present at that waterbody; however, if caught the default regulations for the Watershed Unit apply. SHL=Special Harvest Licence, BKTR = Brook Trout, BNTR=Brown Trout, BURB = Burbot, CISC = Cisco, CTTR = Cutthroat Trout, DLVR = Dolly Varden, GOLD = Goldeye, LKTR = Lake Trout, LKWH = Lake Whitefish, MNWH = Mountain Whitefish, NRPK = Northern Pike, RNTR = Rainbow Trout, SAUG = Sauger, TGTR = Tiger Trout, WALL = Walleye, YLPR = Yellow Perch. Regulation changes are highlighted blue. Waterbodies closed to angling are highlighted grey. PP2 - Lakes, Reservoirs and Ponds Waterbody Waterbody Detail Season Bait WALL NRPK YLPR LKWH BURB Trout Total l = Bait allowed Arm Lake OPEN MAY 15 TO MAR. 31 l 3 over 15 fish 63 cm Battle Lake Portion west of the west boundary of section 22-46-2-W5; OPEN JUNE 1 TO MAR. 31 l 0 fish 0 fish 5 fish 10 fish 2 fish; but limit Includes tributaries and outlet downstream to Sec. Rd. 771 is 0 from Feb. 1 to Mar. 31 Remainder of the lake OPEN MAY 15 TO MAR. 31 l 0 fish 0 fish 5 fish 10 fish 2 fish; but limit is 0 from Feb. 1 to Mar. 31 Berry Creek (Carolside) Reservoir 27-12-W4 OPEN MAY 15 TO MAR. 31 l 1 fish 45-50 1 fish 15 fish cm 63-70 cm Big Lake Includes tributaries OPEN MAY 15 TO MAR.
    [Show full text]
  • Agricultural Inventory Project
    2009 DEVELOPMENT October October TLE RIVER ALLIANCE FOR ECONOMIC T BA Agricultural Inventory Project K. Polturak Management & Consulting Inc. Box 2336 Lac La Biche, Alberta T0A 2C0 (780) 984 2060 Showcasing The Agricultural Diversity of the Battle River Region K. Polturak Management & KP Consulting Inc. ‘enhancing individual and organizational performance’ October 30, 2009 Battle River Alliance for Economic Development Box 373 5023 – 50 St. Killam, Alberta T0B 2L0 Dear Ms. Beddoes, Mr. Krause and Agriculture Task Team members: I am pleased to submit this final report ‘Agricultural Inventory Project’ to the Battle River Alliance for Economic Development Agriculture Task Team. The report showcases the diverse agricultural products produced, processed and manufactured in the geographic region encompassing the Counties of Beaver, Camrose, Flagstaff, Paintearth, the Municipal Districts of Provost and Wainwright, the City of Camrose and the Village of Consort. Many public sources were used to obtain as much information as possible. This was augmented with telecom contact with the individuals who operated or managed the agricultural operation. The main body of the report concludes with a series of statistical tables comparing crop and livestock production between the 1996, 2001 and 2006 agricultural censuses. The information contained herein will assist the task team in the development of a strategic plan to identify markets, promote locally produced products and support the continued growth of the local agricultural community. Thank you for
    [Show full text]
  • Distribution, Abundance and Habitat Associations of Beavers, Muskrats, Mink and River Otters in the Aoserp Study Area, Northeastern Alberta
    DISTRIBUTION, ABUNDANCE AND HABITAT ASSOCIATIONS OF BEAVERS, MUSKRATS, MINK AND RIVER OTTERS IN THE AOSERP STUDY AREA, NORTHEASTERN ALBERTA by Gary F. Searing LGL LIMITED for ALBERTA OIL SANDS ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH PROGRAM Project LS 23.2 August 1979 ix TABLE OF CONTENTS Page DECLARATION •••••••••...•.........•..•....•...••..•..•..... i i LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL~· .........••.....•.......•.......•.. iii DESCRIPTIVE SUMMARY ••••................................... iv LIST OF TABLES ..................••........................ Xi i LIST OF FIGURES •....•.........•.....................•..... xi i i LIST OF AP~[NDICES ....................................... xiv ABSTRACT .•............•........•............ ~ ............. XV ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .......................................•.. xvi INTRODUCTION •............•................................ PART 1. HABITAT USE AND PREFERENCES OF BEAVERS, MUSKRATS, /MTNK AND RIVER OTTERS: A LITERATURE REVIEW . • . 4 l. INTRODUCTION •••..............••................ 4 2. BEAVER •.•....•••.............••...•.•....•..•.• 5 2.1 Introduction ....••.•.•.•...........•.........•. 5 2.2 Vegetative Requirements ....•..........•.•...... 8 2. 2.1 Food Quality •.•..................•..•....... 8 2.2.2 Food Quantity ...•...••....•...••••.•.••...•. 9 2.2.3 Distance Travelled for Food ............... .. 10 2.3 Lodge Site Requirements .•....•......•...•.•...• 11 2.4 Dam Site Requirements •••.•................••.•• 12 2.5 Canals ••••...•...••......••..••..•...•.•....... 12 2.6 Soil Requirements •..•.•....•....•..•••.••.•.•••
    [Show full text]