DOCSLIB.ORG

The 28Th Oil Shale Symposium

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The 28Th Oil Shale Symposium 28th Oil Shale Symposium 2008 Golden, Colorado, USA 13 - 15 October 2008 ISBN: 978-1-63439-438-3 Printed from e-media with permission by: Curran Associates, Inc. 57 Morehouse Lane Red Hook, NY 12571 Some format issues inherent in the e-media version may also appear in this print version. Copyright© (2008) by the Colorado School of Mines All rights reserved. Printed by Curran Associates, Inc. (2014) For permission requests, please contact the Colorado School of Mines at the address below. Colorado School of Mines 1500 Illinois St. Golden, CO 80401 Phone: 303-273-3000 or 800-446-9488 www.mines.edu Additional copies of this publication are available from: Curran Associates, Inc. 57 Morehouse Lane Red Hook, NY 12571 USA Phone: 845-758-0400 Fax: 845-758-2634 Email: [email protected] Web: www.proceedings.com TABLE OF CONTENTS SESSION 1: WELCOMING PLENARY (METALS HALL, GREEN CENTER) Welcome to the 28th Oil Shale Symposium .........................................................................................................................1 J. Boak Oil Shale Symposium Welcoming Remarks ........................................................................................................................2 M. Scoggins Utah’s Strategy for Development of Oil Shale.....................................................................................................................5 J. Huntsman Colorado’s Strategy for Development of Oil Shale.............................................................................................................6 H. Sherman Colorado School of Mines Oil Shale Symposium October 13, 2008...................................................................................7 F. Wade SESSION 2: PROGRAM OVERVIEW PLENARY (METALS HALL, GREEN CENTER) Oil Shale and Global Energy Needs ................................................................................................................................... 22 R. Charles Shell Exploration & Production: Unconventional Oil ...................................................................................................... 28 T. O'Connor What is Total Doing in Oil Shale?...................................................................................................................................... 33 P. Allix Western Energy Basin Initiative......................................................................................................................................... 44 M. Hagood, T. Wood, A. Wolfsberg, T. Dammer Status: Utah Oil Shale Development .................................................................................................................................. 53 L. Nelson SESSION 3: IN SITU PROCESSING (METALS HALL, GREEN CENTER) Parameteric Controls on the Composition of Oil Generated by In Situ Pyrolysis of Oil Shale .................................... 59 W. Meurer, W. Symington, A. Braun, R. Kaminsky, D. Olgaard, G. Otten, T. Phillips, M. Thomas, L. Wenger, J. Yeakel Shell’s In situ Conversion Process – Factors Affecting the Properties of Produced Shale Oil...................................... 68 G. Beer, E. Zhang, S. Wellington, R. Ryan, H. Vinegar Shell ICP – Shale Oil Refining............................................................................................................................................ 78 V. Nair, R. Ryan, G. Roes Influence of Water Vapor Pressure on Oil Shale Product Recovery............................................................................... 85 E. Mattson, C. Palmer SESSION 4: ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES (PETROLEUM HALL, GREEN CENTER) Solid Wastes of Oil Shale Processing, Environmental Challenges of Disposal and Use................................................. 96 U. Kirso, N. Irha, J. Reinik, G. Urb, E. Steinnes Aspects of 3D and Groundwater Modeling in Oil Shale Basins..................................................................................... 110 P. Quinn Environmental Review of Selected Oil Shale Technologies............................................................................................ 126 J. Covell Successful Test of a Frozen Ground Barrier to Flow...................................................................................................... 135 B. McKinzie, H. Vinegar, M. Day SESSION 5: IN SITU PROCESS MODELING (METALS HALL, GREEN CENTER) Heat Conduction Modeling Tools for Screening In Situ Oil Shale Conversion Processes........................................... 145 W. Symington, P. Spiecker Transport Model of the AMSO (Formerly EGL) Oil Shale Process ............................................................................. 158 P. Wallman, A. Burnham Modeling Deformation & Fracturing of Oil Shale Rock Induced by In Situ Fluid Generation.................................. 169 H. Huang, P. Meakin, A. Malthe-Sorenssen, T. Wood, C. Palmer, E. Mattson Resource Characterization and Reservoir Modeling of Oil Shale Deposits in Uinta Basin, Utah .............................. 179 J. Bauman, C. Huang, M. Deo, W. Gallin, R. Gani SESSION 6: DATA REVIEW & ASSESSMENT (PETROLEUM HALL, GREEN CENTER) Aspects of Jordan Oil Shale as Investment Opportunity................................................................................................ 196 J. Alali Re-Evaluation of Utah’s Uinta Basin Oil Shale Resource .............................................................................................. 197 M. Berg Common Data Repository Development and Water Resource Assessment in the Piceance Basin ............................. 213 J. Thomas Risk Assessment in the Quality Control of Oil Shale in Estonian Deposit.................................................................... 222 S. Sabanov SESSION 7: OIL SHALE PROPERTIES (METALS HALL, GREEN CENTER) Log Interpretation Parameters Determined by Analysis of Green River Oil Shale Samples: Initial Steps.................................................................................................................................................................................... 241 M. Herron, M. Machlus, S. Herron New & Old Oil Shale Reserves in Jordan: Comparative Study..................................................................................... 249 M. Nawasreh, M. Reshaydat Estimation of Flow Geometry, Swept Volume, and Surface Area from Tracer Tests ................................................. 263 P. Reimus, G. Shook Dielectric Properties of Jordanian Oil Shales.................................................................................................................. 271 M. Al-Harahsheh, S. Kingman, A. Saied, J. Robinson, G. Dimitrakis, H. Al-Nawaflah SESSION 8: EVALUATION OF OIL SHALE OPTIONS (PETROLEUM HALL, GREEN CENTER) Rational Technology for Processing Oil Shale from Different Deposits in the World................................................. 284 E. Volkov Evaluation Model for Choice of Oil Shale Mining and Processing Technologies......................................................... 296 A. Blokhin, R. Salikhov, E. Golmshtok, M. Petrov Modeling Analysis and Process Optimization for Different Oil Shale Deposits ........................................................... 309 J. Jia, R. Sherritt, J. Schmidt, S. Li, F. Han General Perspectives on Methods of Oil Shale Extraction and R&R Needs................................................................. 319 G. Miller SESSION 9: GEOLOGY & STRATIGRAPHY I Sequence Stratigraphic and Stable Isotopic Expressions of Over-Filled and Balanced-Filled Transitions within the Tipton Member of the Green River Formation, WY................................................................ 345 J. Walker, A. Carroll A Study of the Axial Arch in Northwest Colorado - A Barrier Between Eocene Lake Uinta and Eocene Lake Gosiute ......................................................................................................................................................... 355 R. Johnson, M. Brownfield, J. Self Unified Stratigraphy and Depositional Systems - Green River Oil Shale in the Piceance & Greater Green River Basins, Colorado & Wyoming .................................................................................................................... 381 J. Sarg, Y. Bartov, A. Carroll, T. Lowenstein Geology and Oil Shale Resource Characterization of the Green River Formation in the Northern Piceance Creek Basin, Colorado – A Shell ICP Perspective .......................................................................................... 392 M. Picha, S. Cameron, G. Daub SESSION 10: SURFACE PROCESS MODELING (PETROLEUM HALL, GREEN CENTER) Mathematical Modeling of Oil Shale Pyrolysis ............................................................................................................... 393 K. Ghesmat, S. Save Process Modeling for the Development of Oil Shale Retorting Processes..................................................................... 404 R. Sherritt, J. Jia, J. Schmidt, M. Purnomo Oil Shale Pyrolysis Modeling............................................................................................................................................ 416 R. Sarathi SESSION 11: GEOLOGY & STRATIGRAPHY (METALS HALL, GREEN CENTER) Oil Shale Geology Assessments in Jordan ....................................................................................................................... 428 K. Shawabkeh Thickness, Compositional and Textural Variability, and Genesis of El-Lajjun Oil Shale, Central Jordan................................................................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Oil Shale in Jordan 1 2.1
    MINISTRY OF ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES Mineral Status and Future Opportunity OIL SHALE Prepared By Dr Jamal Alali Geo. Abdelfattah Abu Salah Dr. Suha M. Yasin Geo. Wasfi Al Omari Edited By Geo. Julia Sahawneh Geo. Marwan Madanat 2014 Oil Shale Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources, 2014 CONTENTS List of Contents I List of Figures II List of Tables II 1. Introduction 1 2. Geology of Oil Shale in Jordan 1 2.1. Origin and Definition 1 2.2. Mineralogy and Chemistry of Oil Shale 2 2.3. Uses and Industrial Applications of Oil Shale 3 3. Oil Shale Deposits 3 3.1. El-Lajjun Deposit 4 3.2. Sultani Oil Shale Deposit 6 3.3. Attarat Umm Ghudran Oil Shale Deposit 8 3.4. Wadi Maghar Oil Shale Deposit 9 3.5. Khan Az Zabib Deposit 10 3.6. Jurf Ed Darawish Deposit 11 3.7. Siwaqa Deposit 11 3.8. El Hasa Deposit 12 3.9. Eth Thamad/ Madaba Area 4. Summary of Previous Technical Activities 12 5. Mining Aspects 14 5.1. Overburden 14 5.2. Ore Body of the Oil Shale 14 5.3. Reserves 14 5.4. Mining Method 15 6. Oil shale Technologies and Exploitation Worldwide 17 6.1. Crude Oil Production 17 6.2. Power Generation 18 7. Investment Opportunities and Outlook 19 7.1. Crude Oil Production 20 7.2. Direct Combustion 20 8. References 23 I Oil Shale Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources, 2014 List of Figures Figure (1): Location map of the major oil shale deposits. 5 Figure (2): Oil Shale outcrop in El-Lajjun deposit.
    [Show full text]
  • Shale Oil Combustion
    INIS-mf—1 5509 University of Jordan J09600040 Faculty of Graduate Studies f’'r*dit.i(c Department of Engineering Mnthrm.'Ucs nncl Physical Science: SHALE OIL COMBUSTION 13 Y MOHAMMED AW WAD ALI AL-DABJJAS SUPERVISOR Dr. MOHAMMED II AMD AN AND Dr. V. II. KHRA1SIIA Submitted in partial fulfillment of Hie requirements for the degree of master of science in mechanical engineering. Faculty of Graduate Studies, University of Jordan. Amman , Jordan May , 1002 tr** POUR QUALITY I ORIGINAL 8 Ns OS u We regret that some of the pages in this report may not be up to the proper legibility standards, even though the best possible copy was used for scanning The Examining CommiU.ee considers this thesis satisfactory and acceptable for Ui award of the Degree of Master of Science in Mechanical Engineering in MAY, 1992. Dr. Mohammed Hamdan Chairman of Conrfhittee Mechanical Engineering Department University of Jordan Dr. Y. II. Khraisha Chemical Engineering Department University of Jordan Dr. S. A. Saved Member of Committee Chemical Engineering Department University of Jordan Dr. M. Ham mad Member of Committee Mechanical Engineering Department University of Jordan Dr. Ali Badran Member of Committee Mechanical Engineering Department University of Jordan To my mother and father I Acknowledgements H. is of my pleasure to express my gratitude to all people who helped me in completing the present work. Special thanks are indebted to my supervisors Dr. M. Hamdan and Dr. Y. Khraisha, whom without their support, encouragement and advice, my work could have been infinitely more difficult . Also special thanks are indebted to my family, especially my father and my mother for their advice and encouragement .
    [Show full text]
  • Bitümlü Şeyl
    MADEN TETKİK VE ARAMA GENEL MÜDÜRLÜĞÜ DÜNYADA VE TÜRKİYE’DE BİTÜMLÜ ŞEYL HAZIRLAYANLAR Ragıp Zafer Fatih COŞKUN Maden Yük. Müh. Fizibilite Etütleri Daire Başkanlığı 2019 1 İçindekiler 1. GİRİŞ ..................................................................................................................................... 4 2. OLUŞUMU ........................................................................................................................... 6 2.1. Bitümlü Şeyllerin Sınıflandırılması ................................................................................ 8 3. FİZİKSEL VE KİMYASAL ÖZELLİKLERİ ..................................................................... 11 3.1. Fischer Tahlil Yöntemi ................................................................................................. 11 4. BİTÜMLÜ ŞEYL YATAKLARI VE YAPILAN TEKNOLOJİK ÇALIŞMALAR .......... 12 4.1. Dünyadaki Önemli Yataklar ......................................................................................... 12 4.1.1. Amerika Birleşik Devletleri ................................................................................................ 13 4.1.2. Avustralya ........................................................................................................................... 14 4.1.3. Brezilya ............................................................................................................................... 15 4.1.4. Çin........…………………………………………………………………………………….15 4.1.5. Estonya ...............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Alberta Taciuk Process
    UMATAC Industrial Processes A company of Polysius THE ALBERTA TACIUK PROCESS For the Treatment and Recovery of Oil from: x OIL SANDS DEPOSITS x OIL SHALE DEPOSITS x HYDROCARBON CONTAMINATED MATERIALS x SPECIALTY THERMAL RECOVERY PROJECTS ATP Systems Developed and Distributed by: UMATAC Industrial Processes A company of Polysius Calgary, Alberta, Canada UMATAC Industrial Processes A company of Polysius AN INTRODUCTION TO UMATAC INDUSTRIAL PROCESSES AND THE ALBERTA TACIUK PROCESS (ATP) The Alberta Taciuk Process (ATP) is a unique, thermal processing technology applicable to numerous industrial uses for vaporizing and recovering organic constituents that exist in a large range of feed materials. This process was originally developed and exhaustively tested for applicability to treating Alberta oil sands, commencing in 1976. It was later refined for use in oil shales and contaminated wastes treatment options. The uses which have been proven to date include: Extraction and production of oil from oil sands. Extraction and production of oil from oil shales. Remediation of organic, hydrocarbon-bearing wastes or contaminated materials that may be present in soils, sludges and solid wastes. Remediation and recovery of used lubricating oils; and Partial upgrading of heavy oil to produce a pumpable distillate. Other applications that have been tested at small scale include separation of volatile metals, reduction of used rubber products and other solid wastes and reprocessing of off-specification or waste petrochemical products. The flexibility of the ATP for treating these various materials coupled with the ability to meet processing requirements within acceptable product and environmental standards offers potential users an economic and efficient process and equipment package to be considered for industrial uses in the fields of resource development and environmental remediation.
    [Show full text]
  • Distinctive Oil Shale Pyrolysis Behavior in Indirectly Heated Fixed Bed With
    RSC Advances PAPER View Article Online View Journal | View Issue Distinctive oil shale pyrolysis behavior in indirectly heated fixed bed with internals Cite this: RSC Adv.,2017,7, 21467 Lanxin Lin,ab Dengguo Lai,ab Zhen Shi,ab Zhennan Hanab and Guangwen Xu *ac Intrinsic characteristics of oil shale pyrolysis in a fixed bed reactor with internals have been investigated in this study. Mounting particularly designed internals in fixed bed reactor improved shale oil production to up to 90% yield by Fischer assay. Comparing particle characteristics at different radial positions of the reactors with and without internals demonstrated that, inside the particle bed with internals, the product flow was regulated to move from the high-temperature zone (outer) to low-temperature zone (center), which reduced the secondary reactions of released volatiles. Terminating oil shale pyrolysis at central particle bed temperatures of 150, 300, 450, and 550 C showed that the contents of vacuum gas oil and heavy oil in the shale oil produced had increased from 9.63 wt% to 53.29 wt%. The volatile contents of particles in the inner layer of the reactor slightly increased in the early stage of pyrolysis and, in turn, decomposed to form pyrolysis products as the temperature was raised. The adsorption or condensation of liquids on Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported Licence. the surface of particles gradually increased from the outer region to the central region of the reactor due to the regulated product flow direction and low temperatures in the central zone of the reactor causing heavy components to condense. Increasing the degree of pyrolysis was also found to decrease Received 25th February 2017 the alkene, aromatic, and cycloalkane contents in shale oil, but increased those of alkane and Accepted 3rd April 2017 heteroatomic compounds.
    [Show full text]
  • Jordan's Commercial Oil Shale Exploitation Strategy
    27th Oil Shale Symposium Colorado School of Mines 15-17 October, 2007 Jordan's Commercial Oil Shale Exploitation Strategy Eng. Munther S. Besieso Senior Technical Advisor, Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources P.O. Box 140027, Amman 11814, Jordan [email protected] Abstract This paper explains Jordan's Oil Shale Development Strategy and discuses the mechanisms to put Jordan on the road to greater energy independence and make it a pioneer country in commercial applications. The future beneficial use of the oil shale resources depends on the following facts: 1. Suitable oil shale technologies that have already been developed to use oil shale economically and cleanly can be employed successfully in Jordan. 2. Oil shale is Jordan’s most extensive domestic fossil-fuel source throughout the 21st cen- tury and beyond. 3. Jordan ranks third in the world of oil shale reserves. The identified reserves are more than 70 billion metric tones. Jordan has signed five Memoranda of Understanding (MOUs) with international companies to undertake viability studies for the use of well-known surface mining and retorting tech- nologies such as: Petrosix, Kiviter, Galoter and ATP, and with Shell to undertake a full comprehensive assessment of employing the deep In Situ Conversion Process. During the coming months, a pilot and a demonstration phase will be established to be followed by commercial production of shale oil and/or electricity substituting for imported crude oil and petroleum products. Oil shale is seen as a viable option at today’s oil prices so that oil shale use will result in significant savings in foreign exchange, improve Jordan’s energy supply and security and create new jobs.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of Plans and Progress on US Bureau of Land Management Oil Shale RD&D Leases in the United States Peter M
    Assessment of Plans and Progress on US Bureau of Land Management Oil Shale RD&D Leases in the United States Peter M. Crawford, Christopher Dean, and Jeffrey Stone, INTEK, Inc. James C. Killen, US Department of Energy Purpose This paper describes the original plans, progress and accomplishments, and future plans for nine oil shale research, development and demonstration (RD&D) projects on six existing RD&D leases awarded in 2006 and 2007 by the United States Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management (BLM) to Shell, Chevron, EGL (now AMSO), and OSEC (now Enefit American, respectively); as well as three pending leases to Exxon, Natural Soda, and AuraSource, that were offered in 2010. The outcomes associated with these projects are expected to have global applicability. I. Background The United States is endowed with more than 6 trillion barrels of oil shale resources, of which between 800 billion and 1.4 trillion barrels of resources, primarily in Colorado, Wyoming, and Utah may be recoverable using known and emerging technologies. (Figure 11) These resources represent the largest and most concentrated oil shale resources in the world. More than 75 percent of these resources are located on Federal lands managed by the Department of the Interior. BLM is responsible for making land use decisions and managing exploration of energy and mineral resource on Federal lands. In 2003, rising oil prices and increasing concerns about the economic costs and security of oil imports gave rise to a BLM oil shale research, development and demonstration (RD&D) program on lands managed by BLM in Colorado, Utah, and Wyoming.
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainable Energy Mix and Policy Framework for Jordan
    Sustainable Energy Mix and Policy Framework for Jordan Sustainable Energy Mix and Policy Framework for Jordan ! "!!# a & H/ N c ^8H_ !"# $% & '()# *!+, -(!. /(! 0(!&1 $(R+ 3#/ &, 4++5 *!&!)67 8 9 :8 ;< =<( 3( 5 9::>??8; =)!<(!51 !"# $% & '()# *!+ -(!. /(! 0(!& & P ?,;AY<CA/C AT6"-AT68 '(CA2*>,E( (C;.A2T012E(3<-;T "#$%&' ())$$$"# * $#,% ())$$"#$ * . / ) 0 1 23 45 6 7))8 9): ) ()) <=$$ * IR.0 > E(W$QA\R=(M Sustainable Energy Mix and Policy Framework for Jordan “Meanwhile, we are dealing pro-actively to overcome our limited natural resources. By better managing water resources, and increasing supply through desalination, while providing new solar, wind, and nuclear energy sources, Jordan‘s future development will be secured”. * His Majesty King Abdullah II, the Jordan Investment Forum, 2007 “The sun-belt and the technology belt can become very powerful when they begin to understand themselves as a community: a community of energy, water and climate security; a community for their common future.” * H.R.H. Prince El Hassan Bin Talal, World Energy Dialogue, Hannover Messe, April 2006 “The answer for all these crises is the change to renewable energy, a green culture and green economies. And it is about time for the change to take place,” * H.R.H. Prince Asem Bin Nayef, Green Techies Forum and Exhibition, 2010 “Even if we had the best uranium reserves in the world, we would still need to pursue oil shale and other energy sources…”; “However, I think the technology to extract oil from oil shale is still under development, whereas nuclear is a well-proven technology,” * H.E. Dr. Khaled Toukan, the Head of Jordan’s Atomic Energy Commission (JAEC) “We believe more than 3,000 jobs in the coming few years will be created from renewable energy, the GDP will increase 2.5 – 4% because of investment in renewable energy.
    [Show full text]
  • A Review on Technologies for Oil Shale Surface Retort
    YIGENERAL PAN et al., AND PHYSICAL J.Chem.Soc.Pak.,Vol. 34, No.6, 2012 1331 A Review on Technologies for Oil Shale Surface Retort YI PAN*, XIAOMING ZHANG, SHOUHUI LIU, SHUANGCHUN YANG AND NAN REN Liaoning Shihua University, Liaoning Fushun 113001, China, [email protected]* (Received on 10th April 2012, accepted in revised form 3rd September 2012) Summary: In recent years, with the shortage of oil resources and the continuous increase in oil prices, oil shale has seized much more attention. Oil shale is a kind of important unconventional oil and gas resources. Oil shale resources are plentiful according to the proven reserves in places. And shale oil is far richer than crude oil in the world. Technology processing can be divided into two categories: surface retorting and in-situ technology. The process and equipment of surface retorting are more mature, and are still up to now, the main way to produce shale oil from oil shale. According to the variations of the particle size, the surface retorting technologies of oil shale can be notified and classified into two categories such as lump shale process and particulate shale process. The lump shale processes introduced in this article include the Fushun retorting technology, the Kiviter technology and the Petrosix technology; the particulate processes include the Gloter technology, the LR technology, the Tosco-II technology, the ATP (Alberta Taciuk Process) technology and the Enefit-280 technology. After the thorough comparison of these technologies, we can notice that, this article aim is to show off that : the particulate process that is environmentally friendly, with its low cost and high economic returns characteristics, will be the major development trend; Combined technologies of surface retorting technology and other oil producing technology should be developed; the comprehensive utilization of oil shale should be considered during the development of surface retorting technology, meanwhile the process should be harmless to the environment.
    [Show full text]
  • PACE Synthetic Fuels Report V. 26 No. 4
    230.5'02 o pace SrntfletIc fne]its report OIL SHALE 0 COAL 0 OIL SANDS VOLUME 26 — NUMBER 4 — DECEMBER 1989 QUARTERLY Toil Eril Repository • 1Lr Lakes Library Sch',ol of M!:ts (S)THE PACE CONSULTANTS INC. ®Reg . U.S. Pot. OFF. Pace Synthetic Fuels Rqiiat is published by The Pace Consultants Inc., as a multi-client service and Is intended for the sole use of the clients or organizations affiliated with clients by virtue of a relationship equivalent to 51 percent or greater ownership. Pace Synthetic Fuels Report is protected by the copyright laws of the United States; reproduction of any part of the publication requires the express permission of The Pace Con- sultants Inc. The Pace Consultants Inc., has provided energy consulting and engineering services since 1955. The company's experience includes resource evalua- tion, process development and design, systems planning, marketing studies, licensor comparisons, environmental planning, and economic analysis. The Synthetic Fuels Analysis group prepares a variety of periodic and other reports analyzing developments in the energy field. THE PACE CONSULTANTS INC. SYNTHETIC FUELS ANALYSIS MANAGING EDITOR Jerry E. Sinor Pt Office Box 649 Niwot, Colorado 80544 (303) 652-2632 BUSINESS MANAGER Horace 0. Hobbs Jr. Post Office Box 53473 Houston, Texas 77052 (713) 669-7816 Telex: 77-4350 CONTENTS HIGHLIGHTS GENERAL CORPORATIONS lOT Notes Synthetic Fuels Research Efforts 1-1 NCA Urges "Marshall Plan" for National Energy Strategy 1-3 ORNL Sets Up Center for Global Environmental Studies 1-3 GOVERNMENT DOE Warns of Deteriorating Domestic Oil and Gas Production 1-5 DOE Makes New Round of Phase I Awards In SBIR Program 1-5 New SBIR Solicitation Targets Synfuels Technologies 1-8 National Energy Strategy Hearings Chug Along 1-10 ENERGY POLICY AND FORECASTS EtA Short-Term Outlook Sees Rapid Decline In U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Mineral Resources in Jordan Introduction Metallic Ores Gold
    Mineral Resources in Jordan Introduction Metallic Ores Gold Copper Non Metallic Ores Basalt Silica Sand Zeolite (Zeolitic Tuff) Kaolin Feldspar Bentonite Diatomite Gypsum Dolomite Pure Limestone Chalk Zircon Energy Resources Ores Oil Shale Ornamental Stones Mineral Resources in Jordan Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources Basalt Introduction Basalt in Jordan is part of the North Arabian Basaltic Plateau and covers an area of about 11,000km2 in the northeast of Jordan and extends northwest into Syria and southeast into Saudi Arabia. Meanwhile, a group of small continental volcanic rocks are present in Central Jordan. Basalt can be used in many industrial applications such as: rock wool, Pipes, moulds, and as construction materials. Geological Setting They were at least two phases of extensive basaltic activity in central Jordan during Neogene to Quaternary. The oldest basaltic flow crops out north of Al Hashimya where it is partly covered by Pleistocene sediments. The youngest flow covered Wadi gravels north and northwest of Jurf Ed-Darawish village. The basaltic flows form aboard plateau area and comprise mostly massive and blocky lava in the study area. Volcaniclastic deposits are up to 15m thick and exposed in the eastern part of Jabal Uneiza area. Location Basalt rocks in Jordan can be roughly divided into three groups: plateau basalts Harrat ash Shaam in north eastern Jordan, basalts relating to the Dead Sea rift, and finally isolated basalt effusions in central Jordan, mostly bound to deep faults. In addition to these areas, basalt are also known in other places in the form of dykes or sills and other minor bodies, Basalt occurs in different localities in Jordan, but the most important locations are Tell Burma and Jabel Uneiza, about 170km south of Amman in Jurf Ed-Darawish map sheet area.
    [Show full text]
  • EMD Oil Shale Committee
    EMD Oil Shale Committee 2016 EMD Oil Shale Committee Final Report Alan K. Burnham (Chair), Stanford University May 18, 2016 Vice-Chairs: Dr. Mariela Araujo (Vice-Chair: Industry), Shell International Exploration and Production Dr. Lauren Birgenheier (Vice-Chair: University), University of Utah Dr. Justin E. Birdwell (Vice-Chair: Government), U.S. Geological Survey Advisory Group: Dr. Jeremy Boak, Oklahoma Geological Survey, University of Oklahoma Mr. Ronald C. Johnson, U.S. Geological Survey Special Consultants to the Committee: Robert Kleinberg, Schlumberger-Doll Research Steven Kerr, Millcreek Mining Group Jaanus Purga, Viru Keemia Grupp (VKG) Rikki Hrenko-Browning, Enefit American Oil Indrek Aarna, Eesti Energia Steven Odut, Thyssenkrupp Gary Aho, Sage Geotech Pierre Allix, Total S.A. John Parsons, QER Pty Ltd Gerald Daub, Daub & Associates, Inc. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Progress on oil shale continued around the world, although many projects have been cancelled recently due to low oil prices. New production capacity was in full force in Estonia and China, and plans for production moved forward in Jordan and Utah, although at a slower pace than expected a few years ago. Some companies are re-optimizing their processes and projects to adapt to the current economic situation. The current status is still in flux, and it is too early to know whether we are seeing a repeat of the 1980s or a shorter-term correction. Oil shale continues to be mined and retorted or burned in power plants in Estonia, China and Brazil. Production rose significantly in 2015, but future expansion is uncertain. In Estonia, Viru Keemia Grupp brought a second Petroter plant on line in Q3 of 2014 and a third unit in the Q3 of 2015, 1 bringing their total installed capacity to ~14,000 BOPD (barrels of oil per day).
    [Show full text]