Romanization of Urban Spaces in Ephesus a Thesis

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Romanization of Urban Spaces in Ephesus a Thesis ROMANIZATION OF URBAN SPACES IN EPHESUS A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF SOCIAL SCIENCES OF MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY BY HİDAYET VOLKAN TOPAL IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS IN THE DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY OF ARCHITECTURE SEPTEMBER 2020 Approval of the thesis: ROMANIZATION OF URBAN SPACES IN EPHESUS submitted by HİDAYET VOLKAN TOPAL in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in History of Architecture, the Graduate School of Social Sciences of Middle East Technical University by, Prof. Dr. Yaşar KONDAKÇI Dean Graduate School of Social Sciences Prof. Dr. Fatma Cânâ BİLSEL Head of Department Architecture Prof. Dr. Suna GÜVEN Supervisor History of Architecture Examining Committee Members: Assoc. Prof. Dr. Lale ÖZGENEL (Head of the Examining Committee) Middle East Technical University History of Architecture Prof. Dr. Suna GÜVEN (Supervisor) Middle East Technical University History of Architecture Assoc. Prof. Dr. Onur ÖZTÜRK Columbia College Chicago Art and Art History Assist. Prof. Dr. Pelin YONCACI ARSLAN Middle East Technical University History of Architecture Assist. Prof. Dr. İdil ÜÇER KARABABA İstanbul Bilgi University Interior Design PLAGIARISM PLAGIARISM I hereby declare that all information in this document has been obtained and presented in accordance with academic rules and ethical conduct. I also declare that, as required by these rules and conduct, I have fully cited and referenced all material and results that are not original to this work. Name, Last Name: Hidayet Volkan TOPAL Signature: iii ABSTRACT ROMANIZATION OF URBAN SPACES IN EPHESUS TOPAL, Hidayet Volkan M.A., The Department of History of Architecture Supervisor: Prof. Dr. Suna GÜVEN September 2020, 309 pages Expansion of the Roman sphere of influence over various societies and heterogeneous cultures prompted a unique acculturation in the provinces that is referred to as Romanization. The imperial cult, in general, is considered to be both an indicator of this cultural change and an agent that took an effective role in the process of acculturation. The imperial cult in the provincial context of Asia provides a remarkable case to grasp the acculturation under Roman rule, as a catalyst of defining individuals’ and communities’ identity, creation of collective memory, and an effective way for the locals to make sense of the intrusion of a foreign authority into their world. Eventually, this cultural change resulted in the metamorphosis of the urban spaces that especially manifested in the creation of convenient places for the accommodation of the imperial cult. In this thesis, the analysis of the imperial settings in which the architectural forms of the imperial cult were generated is treated as a convincing resource to grasp the process of Romanization and the various reactions of the local population to a new context. With a focus on the Augustan administrative-cult center, the project analyzes the role of the architectural language of the imperial cult in the metamorphosis of urban spaces in Roman Ephesus. In doing so, an experiential analysis of the urban spaces is iv provided to have a thorough understanding of the Augustan cult center within its larger urban context as a smaller component of a grander scheme. Keywords: Ephesus, imperial cult, Romanization, urban armature v ÖZ EFES’İN KENTSEL MEKANLARININ ROMANİZASYONU TOPAL, Hidayet Volkan Yüksek Lisans, Mimarlık Tarihi Bölümü Tez Yöneticisi: Prof. Dr. Suna GÜVEN Eylül 2020, 309 sayfa Roma nüfuz alanının çeşitli toplumlar ve farklı kültürler üzerindeki yayılımı, eyaletlerde Romanizasyon olarak adlandırılan özgün bir kültürleşmeye yol açtı. İmparatorluk kültü, genel itibarıyla, hem bu kültürel değişimin bir göstergesi hem de kültürleşme sürecinde etkin rol almış bir unsur olarak kabul edilir. Asya eyaleti bağlamındaki imparatorluk kültü, bireylerin ve toplulukların kimliklerinin tanımlanmasında, kolektif belleğin yaratılmasında bir katalizör ve yerel halkın yabancı bir otoritenin kendi dünyalarına girmesini anlamlandırmasında etkili bir yol olarak, Roma yönetimi altındaki kültürleşmeyi kavramak için dikkate değer bir veri sunmaktadır. Sonuç olarak, bu kültürel değişim, özellikle imparatorluk kültüne uygun ortamların yaratılmasında tezahür ederek kentsel alanların başkalaşmasına neden olmuştur. Bu tezde, imparatorluk kültünün mimari biçimlerinin üretildiği imparatorluk ortamlarının analizi, Romanizasyon sürecini ve yerel halkın yeni bir bağlama yönelik çeşitli tepkilerini kavramak için ikna edici bir kaynak olarak ele alınmıştır. Bu çalışma, Roma dönemindeki Efes kentindeki kentsel mekanların dönüşümünde imparatorluk kültünün mimari dilinin rolünü, Augustus dönemi idari-kült merkezine odaklanarak incelemektedir. Böylelikle, Augustus dönemi kült merkezini kendi geniş kentsel vi bağlamında, daha büyük bir düzenin küçük bir bileşeni olarak, derinlemesine anlamak amacıyla kentsel mekanların deneyimsel bir analizi sağlanmıştır. Anahtar Kelimeler: Efes, imparatorluk kültü, Romanizasyon, kentsel armatür vii DEDICATION To my father viii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS First and foremost, I would like to express my deepest gratitude to my advisor, Prof. Dr. Suna Güven, for her inspirational guidance, everlasting patience and invaluable criticism throughout the preparation of this study. Without her support and encouragement at every step of this journey, it would not have been possible to make this thesis what it is. I am also grateful to the members of the examining committee, Assoc. Prof. Dr. Lale Özgenel, Assoc. Prof. Dr. Onur Öztürk, Assist. Prof. Dr. Pelin Yoncacı Arslan and Assist. Prof. Dr. İdil Üçer Karababa, for their invaluable comments, reviews and outstanding contributions to this study. I also owe my thanks to Dr. Aygün Kalınbayrak Ercan for her insightful suggestions and comments. I would also like to extend my gratitude to Assoc. Prof. Dr. Sabine Ladstätter, Filiz Öztürk and other members of the Austrian Archaeological Institute for accepting me in the excavation team in Ephesus, as three seasons of participation in the excavations provided me with an in-depth awareness of the site, which otherwise, I would have never able to get. The experiences that I had in the excavations exceedingly contributed to this thesis. Moreover, I thank Prof. Dr. Musa Kadıoğlu for having me in the excavations in Teos, which surely endowed me with enthusiasm and awareness for undertaking this study. A special thanks to my father, Cengiz Topal, a hard-working archaeologist devoted to his profession, with whom I have been visiting the archaeological sites of Anatolia including those in the most remote places ever since I learned to walk. His towering figure and achievements are certainly the main source of inspiration for this study. I can never express my gratitude enough to my mother, Şaduman Topal, without whom this thesis would have never been completed. She always provided me with motivation and her unwavering support during the hardest times and in every aspect of my life. ix I also would like to thank my uncle, Hasan Topal, a prominent architect, who has been an influential figure for me to have studied architecture, which, in the end, led me to have this thesis. I should express that I am deeply indebted to my beloved siblings, Deniz and Özgür, who were always there for me in times of need. They are my true companions in this life. I also would like to extend my gratitude to my late grandfather on my father’s side, Hidayet Topal, whom I was named after. His impacts on my life with his selfless sacrifices including both during the decades he spent in Germany as a gastarbeiter and beyond are ineffable. Besides, I would like to express my gratitude to my late grandfather on my mother’s side, Ahmet Kavuncu, who had been an influential role model for me. I should also thank my grandmothers on my mother’s side Şahizer Kavuncu, and my father’s side, Hamide Topal, who have always supported me with their prayers and good wishes, which mean a world to me. Moreover, I will always be grateful to my friends Salih Semih Gökçe, Barış Bircan, Yusuf Özdil and Türker Özkan for being an important part of my life. I am very fortunate to have been accompanied with them. Last but not least, I would also like to thank Tuğba Uluger for her endless support, assistance and encouragement throughout the preparation of this study and beyond. x TABLE OF CONTENTS PLAGIARISM ............................................................................................................ iii ABSTRACT ................................................................................................................ iv ÖZ ............................................................................................................................... vi DEDICATION .......................................................................................................... viii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS .......................................................................................... ix TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................................................................ xi LIST OF FIGURES .................................................................................................. xiii LIST OF MAPS ......................................................................................................... xx LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ................................................................................... xxi CHAPTERS 1. INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Seven Churches of Revelation Turkey
    TRAVEL GUIDE SEVEN CHURCHES OF REVELATION TURKEY TURKEY Pergamum Lesbos Thyatira Sardis Izmir Chios Smyrna Philadelphia Samos Ephesus Laodicea Aegean Sea Patmos ASIA Kos 1 Rhodes ARCHEOLOGICAL MAP OF WESTERN TURKEY BULGARIA Sinanköy Manya Mt. NORTH EDİRNE KIRKLARELİ Selimiye Fatih Iron Foundry Mosque UNESCO B L A C K S E A MACEDONIA Yeni Saray Kırklareli Höyük İSTANBUL Herakleia Skotoussa (Byzantium) Krenides Linos (Constantinople) Sirra Philippi Beikos Palatianon Berge Karaevlialtı Menekşe Çatağı Prusias Tauriana Filippoi THRACE Bathonea Küçükyalı Ad hypium Morylos Dikaia Heraion teikhos Achaeology Edessa Neapolis park KOCAELİ Tragilos Antisara Abdera Perinthos Basilica UNESCO Maroneia TEKİRDAĞ (İZMİT) DÜZCE Europos Kavala Doriskos Nicomedia Pella Amphipolis Stryme Işıklar Mt. ALBANIA Allante Lete Bormiskos Thessalonica Argilos THE SEA OF MARMARA SAKARYA MACEDONIANaoussa Apollonia Thassos Ainos (ADAPAZARI) UNESCO Thermes Aegae YALOVA Ceramic Furnaces Selectum Chalastra Strepsa Berea Iznik Lake Nicea Methone Cyzicus Vergina Petralona Samothrace Parion Roman theater Acanthos Zeytinli Ada Apamela Aisa Ouranopolis Hisardere Dasaki Elimia Pydna Barçın Höyük BTHYNIA Galepsos Yenibademli Höyük BURSA UNESCO Antigonia Thyssus Apollonia (Prusa) ÇANAKKALE Manyas Zeytinlik Höyük Arisbe Lake Ulubat Phylace Dion Akrothooi Lake Sane Parthenopolis GÖKCEADA Aktopraklık O.Gazi Külliyesi BİLECİK Asprokampos Kremaste Daskyleion UNESCO Höyük Pythion Neopolis Astyra Sundiken Mts. Herakleum Paşalar Sarhöyük Mount Athos Achmilleion Troy Pessinus Potamia Mt.Olympos
    [Show full text]
  • Hadrian and the Greek East
    HADRIAN AND THE GREEK EAST: IMPERIAL POLICY AND COMMUNICATION DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of the Ohio State University By Demetrios Kritsotakis, B.A, M.A. * * * * * The Ohio State University 2008 Dissertation Committee: Approved by Professor Fritz Graf, Adviser Professor Tom Hawkins ____________________________ Professor Anthony Kaldellis Adviser Greek and Latin Graduate Program Copyright by Demetrios Kritsotakis 2008 ABSTRACT The Roman Emperor Hadrian pursued a policy of unification of the vast Empire. After his accession, he abandoned the expansionist policy of his predecessor Trajan and focused on securing the frontiers of the empire and on maintaining its stability. Of the utmost importance was the further integration and participation in his program of the peoples of the Greek East, especially of the Greek mainland and Asia Minor. Hadrian now invited them to become active members of the empire. By his lengthy travels and benefactions to the people of the region and by the creation of the Panhellenion, Hadrian attempted to create a second center of the Empire. Rome, in the West, was the first center; now a second one, in the East, would draw together the Greek people on both sides of the Aegean Sea. Thus he could accelerate the unification of the empire by focusing on its two most important elements, Romans and Greeks. Hadrian channeled his intentions in a number of ways, including the use of specific iconographical types on the coinage of his reign and religious language and themes in his interactions with the Greeks. In both cases it becomes evident that the Greeks not only understood his messages, but they also reacted in a positive way.
    [Show full text]
  • The Romanization of Romania: a Look at the Influence of the Roman Military on Romanian History and Heritage Colleen Ann Lovely Union College - Schenectady, NY
    Union College Union | Digital Works Honors Theses Student Work 6-2016 The Romanization of Romania: A Look at the Influence of the Roman Military on Romanian History and Heritage Colleen Ann Lovely Union College - Schenectady, NY Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalworks.union.edu/theses Part of the Ancient History, Greek and Roman through Late Antiquity Commons, European History Commons, and the Military History Commons Recommended Citation Lovely, Colleen Ann, "The Romanization of Romania: A Look at the Influence of the Roman Military on Romanian History and Heritage" (2016). Honors Theses. 178. https://digitalworks.union.edu/theses/178 This Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Work at Union | Digital Works. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of Union | Digital Works. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Romanization of Romania: A Look at the Influence of the Roman Military on Romanian History and Heritage By Colleen Ann Lovely ********* Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for Honors in the Departments of Classics and Anthropology UNION COLLEGE March 2016 Abstract LOVELY, COLLEEN ANN The Romanization of Romania: A Look at the Influence of the Roman Military on Romanian History and Heritage. Departments of Classics and Anthropology, March 2016. ADVISORS: Professor Stacie Raucci, Professor Robert Samet This thesis looks at the Roman military and how it was the driving force which spread Roman culture. The Roman military stabilized regions, providing protection and security for regions to develop culturally and economically. Roman soldiers brought with them their native cultures, languages, and religions, which spread through their interactions and connections with local peoples and the communities in which they were stationed.
    [Show full text]
  • Demetrius Poliorcetes and the Hellenic League
    DEMETRIUSPOLIORCETES AND THE HELLENIC LEAGUE (PLATE 33) 1. HISTORICAL BACKGROUND D JURING the six years, 307/6-302/1 B.C., issues were raised and settled which shaped the course of western history for a long time to come. The epoch was alike critical for Athens, Hellas, and the Macedonians. The Macedonians faced squarely during this period the decision whether their world was to be one world or an aggregate of separate kingdoms with conflicting interests, and ill-defined boundaries, preserved by a precarious balance of power and incapable of common action against uprisings of Greek and oriental subjects and the plundering appetites of surrounding barbarians. The champion of unity was King Antigonus the One- Eyed, and his chief lieutenant his brilliant but unstatesmanlike son, King Demetrius the Taker of Cities, a master of siege operations and of naval construction and tactics, more skilled in organizing the land-instruments of warfare than in using them on the battle field. The final campaign between the champions of Macedonian unity and disunity opened in 307 with the liberation of Athens by Demetrius and ended in 301 B.C. with the Battle of the Kings, when Antigonus died in a hail of javelins and Demetrius' cavalry failed to penetrate a corps of 500 Indian elephants in a vain effort to rescue hinm. Of his four adversaries King Lysimachus and King Kassander left no successors; the other two, Kings Ptolemy of Egypt and Seleucus of Syria, were more fortunate, and they and Demetrius' able son, Antigonus Gonatas, planted the three dynasties with whom the Romans dealt and whom they successively destroyed in wars spread over 44 years.
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliography
    Bibliography Many books were read and researched in the compilation of Binford, L. R, 1983, Working at Archaeology. Academic Press, The Encyclopedic Dictionary of Archaeology: New York. Binford, L. R, and Binford, S. R (eds.), 1968, New Perspectives in American Museum of Natural History, 1993, The First Humans. Archaeology. Aldine, Chicago. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco. Braidwood, R 1.,1960, Archaeologists and What They Do. Franklin American Museum of Natural History, 1993, People of the Stone Watts, New York. Age. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco. Branigan, Keith (ed.), 1982, The Atlas ofArchaeology. St. Martin's, American Museum of Natural History, 1994, New World and Pacific New York. Civilizations. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco. Bray, w., and Tump, D., 1972, Penguin Dictionary ofArchaeology. American Museum of Natural History, 1994, Old World Civiliza­ Penguin, New York. tions. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco. Brennan, L., 1973, Beginner's Guide to Archaeology. Stackpole Ashmore, w., and Sharer, R. J., 1988, Discovering Our Past: A Brief Books, Harrisburg, PA. Introduction to Archaeology. Mayfield, Mountain View, CA. Broderick, M., and Morton, A. A., 1924, A Concise Dictionary of Atkinson, R J. C., 1985, Field Archaeology, 2d ed. Hyperion, New Egyptian Archaeology. Ares Publishers, Chicago. York. Brothwell, D., 1963, Digging Up Bones: The Excavation, Treatment Bacon, E. (ed.), 1976, The Great Archaeologists. Bobbs-Merrill, and Study ofHuman Skeletal Remains. British Museum, London. New York. Brothwell, D., and Higgs, E. (eds.), 1969, Science in Archaeology, Bahn, P., 1993, Collins Dictionary of Archaeology. ABC-CLIO, 2d ed. Thames and Hudson, London. Santa Barbara, CA. Budge, E. A. Wallis, 1929, The Rosetta Stone. Dover, New York. Bahn, P.
    [Show full text]
  • The National Herald a Weekly Greek-American Publication 1915-2016 VOL
    Greek Independence Day Parade In New York This Sunday! Let's All Attend! S o C V st ΓΡΑΦΕΙ ΤΗΝ ΙΣΤΟΡΙΑ W ΤΟΥ ΕΛΛΗΝΙΣΜΟΥ E 101 ΑΠΟ ΤΟ 1915 anniversa ry N The National Herald www.thenationalherald.com A weekly Greek-AmericAn PuBlicATion 1915-2016 VOL. 20, ISSUE 1015 March 25-31, 2017 c v $1.50 Greek Architect Wants Dr. Yancopoulos, Grand Marshal, Talks to TNH to Change Skyline of Regeneron’s founding scientist to Manhattan lead the NY parade TNH Staff deposited daily by their inhabi - TNH Staff tants,” Oiio founder Oikonomou NEW YORK – In response to the told Time Out New York. NEW YORK – Dr. George Yan - swathe of supertall luxury resi - “Architects are now free from copoulos, President and Chief dential towers rising in New the old constraints and are scientific officer of the pharma - York, local studio Oiio owned ready to wrestle with a city fab - ceutical company Regeneron, is by Ioannis Oikonomou has pro - ric covered by layers on top of the Grand Marshal for the Greek posed a conceptual skyscraper layers, made of meaning and Independence Parade on March that loops over to boast length memory.” 26 in New York. One of the lead - rather than height. THE BIG BEND ing scientists and the head of The Big Bend would be There is an undeniable ob - one of the largest pharmaceuti - formed from a very thin struc - session that resides in Manhat - cal companies listed on the New ture that curves at the top and tan. It is undeniable because it York Stock Exchange, Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Occupy Sanhedrin Brochure
    Sarah Zell Young is the 4th annual Hadassah-Brandeis Institute (HBI) Artist-in Residence. The 2012 HBI Artist-in-Residence Program is made possible thanks to the generous support of Carol Spinner at Sarah Zell Young Avoda Arts and Arnee and Walter Winshall. About the Hadassah-Brandeis Institute Occupy Sanhedrin The Hadassah-Brandeis Institute develops fresh ways of thinking about Jews and gender worldwide by producing and promoting scholarly research and artistic projects. March 29 - May 18, 2012 About the Women’s Studies Research Center The Women’s Studies Research Center (WSRC) is a place where research, art and activism converge. The Kniznick Gallery is committed to feminist exhibitions of artistic excellence that reflect the activities of the Women's Studies Research Center Scholars and engage communities within and beyond Brandeis University. About Occupy Sanhedrin & As Old as the World The term Sanhedrin refers to the Great Court of ancient Israel during the Second Temple Period. It was composed of 71 men, one chief justice referred to as the Nasi (prince), one assistant chief justice, the Av Beit Din (Patriarch of the rabbinic court) and 69 general members. This judicial body made binding decisions about all aspects of Jewish life in and beyond Jerusalem. The Great Sanhedrin is a prime example of an exclusively male space—not only in its physical gathering of 71 men, but in the scope of influence these men had in making decisions that ruled over all bodies. We learn about the Sanhedrin in the Talmud, an elaborate six-volume documentation of laws derived from interpretations of the Bible.
    [Show full text]
  • The Menorah and the Cross: Historiographic Reflections on a Recent Discovery from Laodicea on the Lycus
    CHAPTER ELEVEN THE MENORAH AND THE CROSS: HISTORIOGRAPHIC REFLECTIONS ON A RECENT DISCOVERY FROM LAODICEA ON THE LYCUS Figure 55. Column drum fragment inscribed with a menorah and a superimposed cross, Laodicea (courtesy of www.HolyLandPhotos.org). The origins of this essay lie in a visit in 2007 to the city of Laodicea on the Lycus, in what was once Phrygia, in modern Turkey. A colleague, the intrepid Mark Wilson of the Asia Minor Research Center, now in Antalya, directed me to a pile of column fragments west of the Roman cardo, where he told me I would find a fragment with a cross and a menorah. Eventu- ally, I found the pile—which has since become a standard stop on the Christian tourism/pilgrimage route—and with great excitement the col- umn. This fragment, which was published in a brief note by the excavator, Celal Şimşek, in 2006, was discovered in the ruins of Nymphaeum A at Laodicea, “to the north side of the so-called Syrian Road,” a building 196 chapter eleven destroyed in an earthquake in 494 CE.1 The presence of a menorah in the nymphaeum compound at the very center of the city did not surprise me. After all, numerous roughly inscribed menorahs were found in the Sebastion of Aphrodisias from late antiquity, a period during which the erstwhile emperor temple compound was subdivided into shops.2 Similar rough menorahs were found in the shops adjacent to the Sardis synagogue (also a building in the city center),3 on a reused marble slab found in the Library of Celsus in Ephesus, and adorning tombs—including some in nearby Hierapolis (Pamukkale)—at numerous other sites.4 Alternatively, perhaps this well-carved column fragment derived from some lost Jewish communal building—perhaps a synagogue.
    [Show full text]
  • Monuments, Materiality, and Meaning in the Classical Archaeology of Anatolia
    MONUMENTS, MATERIALITY, AND MEANING IN THE CLASSICAL ARCHAEOLOGY OF ANATOLIA by Daniel David Shoup A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Classical Art and Archaeology) in The University of Michigan 2008 Doctoral Committee: Professor Elaine K. Gazda, Co-Chair Professor John F. Cherry, Co-Chair, Brown University Professor Fatma Müge Göçek Professor Christopher John Ratté Professor Norman Yoffee Acknowledgments Athena may have sprung from Zeus’ brow alone, but dissertations never have a solitary birth: especially this one, which is largely made up of the voices of others. I have been fortunate to have the support of many friends, colleagues, and mentors, whose ideas and suggestions have fundamentally shaped this work. I would also like to thank the dozens of people who agreed to be interviewed, whose ideas and voices animate this text and the sites where they work. I offer this dissertation in hope that it contributes, in some small way, to a bright future for archaeology in Turkey. My committee members have been unstinting in their support of what has proved to be an unconventional project. John Cherry’s able teaching and broad perspective on archaeology formed the matrix in which the ideas for this dissertation grew; Elaine Gazda’s support, guidance, and advocacy of the project was indispensible to its completion. Norman Yoffee provided ideas and support from the first draft of a very different prospectus – including very necessary encouragement to go out on a limb. Chris Ratté has been a generous host at the site of Aphrodisias and helpful commentator during the writing process.
    [Show full text]
  • Greece • Crete • Turkey May 28 - June 22, 2021
    GREECE • CRETE • TURKEY MAY 28 - JUNE 22, 2021 Tour Hosts: Dr. Scott Moore Dr. Jason Whitlark organized by GREECE - CRETE - TURKEY / May 28 - June 22, 2021 May 31 Mon ATHENS - CORINTH CANAL - CORINTH – ACROCORINTH - NAFPLION At 8:30a.m. depart from Athens and drive along the coastal highway of Saronic Gulf. Arrive at the Corinth Canal for a brief stop and then continue on to the Acropolis of Corinth. Acro-corinth is the citadel of Corinth. It is situated to the southwest of the ancient city and rises to an elevation of 1883 ft. [574 m.]. Today it is surrounded by walls that are about 1.85 mi. [3 km.] long. The foundations of the fortifications are ancient—going back to the Hellenistic Period. The current walls were built and rebuilt by the Byzantines, Franks, Venetians, and Ottoman Turks. Climb up and visit the fortress. Then proceed to the Ancient city of Corinth. It was to this megalopolis where the apostle Paul came and worked, established a thriving church, subsequently sending two of his epistles now part of the New Testament. Here, we see all of the sites associated with his ministry: the Agora, the Temple of Apollo, the Roman Odeon, the Bema and Gallio’s Seat. The small local archaeological museum here is an absolute must! In Romans 16:23 Paul mentions his friend Erastus and • • we will see an inscription to him at the site. In the afternoon we will drive to GREECE CRETE TURKEY Nafplion for check-in at hotel followed by dinner and overnight. (B,D) MAY 28 - JUNE 22, 2021 June 1 Tue EPIDAURAUS - MYCENAE - NAFPLION Morning visit to Mycenae where we see the remains of the prehistoric citadel Parthenon, fortified with the Cyclopean Walls, the Lionesses’ Gate, the remains of the Athens Mycenaean Palace and the Tomb of King Agamemnon in which we will actually enter.
    [Show full text]
  • The Court of Alexander the Great As Social System
    Originalveröffentlichung in Waldemar Heckel/Lawrence Tritle (Hg.), Alexander the Great. A New History, Malden, Mass. u.a. 2009, S. 83-98 5 The Court of Alexander the Great as Social System Gregor Weber In his discussion of events that followed Alexander ’s march through Hyrcania (summer 330), Plutarch gives a succinct summary of the king ’s conduct and reports the clash of his closest friends, Hephaestion and Craterus (Alex. 47.5.9-11).1 The passage belongs in the context of Alexander ’s adoption of the traditions and trap ­ pings of the dead Persian Great King (Fredricksmeyer 2000; Brosius 2003a), although the conflict between the two generals dates to the time of the Indian campaign (probably 326). It reveals not only that Alexander was subtly in tune with the atti­ tudes of his closest friends, but also that his changes elicited varied responses from the members of his circle. Their relationships with each other were based on rivalry, something Alexander - as Plutarch ’s wording suggests - actively encouraged. But it is also reported that Alexander made an effort to bring about a lasting reconcili ­ ation of the two friends, who had attacked each other with swords, and drawn their respective troops into the fray. To do so, he had to marshal “all his resources ” (Hamilton 1969; 128-31) from gestures of affection to death threats. These circumstances invite the question: what was the structural relevance of such an episode beyond the mutual antagonism of Hephaestion and Craterus? For these were not minor protagonists, but rather men of the upper echelon of the new Macedonian-Persian empire, with whose help Alexander had advanced his con ­ quest ever further and exercised his power (Berve nos.
    [Show full text]
  • APOLLONIA NEKROPLÜ KURTARMA KAZILARI 2016-2017 MEZAR TİPLERİ ÜZERİNE BİR İNCELEME Mustafa ŞAHİN
    Şahin, M. (2018). Apollonia Nekroplü kurtarma kazıları 2016-2017 mezar tipleri üzerine bir inceleme. Uluslararası Türkçe Edebiyat Kültür Eğitim Dergisi, 7(4), 2788-2812. Uluslararası Türkçe Edebiyat Kültür Eğitim Dergisi Sayı: 7/4 2018 s. 2788-2812, TÜRKİYE Araştırma Makalesi APOLLONIA NEKROPLÜ KURTARMA KAZILARI 2016-2017 MEZAR TİPLERİ ÜZERİNE BİR İNCELEME Mustafa ŞAHİN Geliş Tarihi: Ekim, 2018 Kabul Tarihi: Aralık, 2018 Öz Bursa ili, Nilüfer ilçesi, Gölyazı Mahallesi’nde yer alan ve antik coğrafyada Bithynia ile Mysia Bölgeleri’nin güney sınırında bulunan Apollonia kentinin Nekropolü’nde define kazılarının artması üzerine Kültür ve Turizm Bakanlığının izni ile Bursa Müzeler Müdürlüğünün başkanlığında ve Uludağ Üniversitesinin bilimsel danışmanlığında 2016-2017 yıllarında kurtarma kazıları gerçekleştirilmiştir. Kazılar esnasında açığa çıkartılan 27 adet mezarda birbirinden farklı 9 tip bulunmaktadır. Kurtarma kazıları ile ilgili geniş bir tanıtım 2018 yılında yayınlanan Apollonia a.R. Araştırmaları Serisi’nin ilk bandı olan Nekropol Kazıları 2016-2017 isimli kitapta yer almaktadır. Bu makalemizde, tespit edilen mezarlardaki tipler için önerdiğimiz terminoloji yeni güncellemeler ile birlikte tartışılmaktadır. Makalede diğer bir dikkat çekmek istediğimiz konu, Apollonia kentinin adıdır. Apollonia literatürde “Apollonia ad Rhyndacum” olarak bilinmektedir. Rhyndakos kenarındaki Apollonia anlamına gelen “ad Rhyndakos” sıfatını oluşturan Rhyndakos (Kocasu / Orhaneli Çayı), Apolyont/Uluabat Gölü’nü beseleyen bir ırmaktır. Ancak Rhyndakos / Kocasu,
    [Show full text]