Partition of Bengal & Other Developm

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Partition of Bengal & Other Developm Class – 10 History Chapter – 5 Second Phase of the Indian National Movement : Partition of Bengal & other Developments HIGHLIGHTS – a) Repressive Policy of Lord Curzon b) The Partition of Bengal c) The Anti-Partition Movement. d) Surat Split of 1907. e) Repressive measures of the Government. f) Objectives, Programme and methods of Struggle of Assertive Nationalists. g) Differences between the Early Nationalists and the Assertive Nationalists. h) Rise and Growth of Revolutionary Movement. i) Outstanding Leaders of Sturdy Nationalism. Description of Highlights – a. Repressive Policy of Lord Curzon – He roused a storm of opposition by the Calcutta Corporation Act of 1899, Universities Act of 1904, The Sedition Act. His most unpopular measure was the Partition of Bengal. Partition was announced in 1903 and carried out in 1905. b. The Partition of Bengal – Causes of Partition : Government’s Version Firstly, the Government regarded the size of the Province of Bengal to be too large to be properly administered by a single Provincial Government. The partition of Bengal, said Curzon, “was a mere readjustment of administrative boundaries.” Secondly, the Secretary to the Government of India noted that the Government was in favour of bringing all the Oriya, i.e., Odia-speaking people (outside the territorial limits of Odisha) under the administration of Bengal. Reasons Behind the Partition: The Nationalists’ Perspective 1. To strike at the Roots of Bengali Nationalism: The real motive was to break “the growing solidarity of Bengali nationalism”. Bengal at that time was considered to be “the nerve-centre of Indian Nationalism..” 2. The Policy of Divide and Rule: The divide and rule policy was adopted by the Britishers to drive a Wedge between the Hindus and the Muslims. 3. To demonstrate the Strength of the British Raj: To prove that it could afford to hold public opinion in contempt.” c. The Anti-Partition Movement – The partition gave such a shock that the whole political life of the province was revolutionized, almost overnight. The Bengalis felt that “they had been insulted, humiliated and tricked.” Under the inspiring leadership of Surendranath Banerjea, K.K. Mitra, Bipin Chandra Pal, Anand Mohan Bose, Aurobindo Ghose, Rabindranath Tagore and others, the agitation spread like wild fire all over Bengal. On 7 August 1905 a massive meeting was held at the Town Hall in Kolkata. The students stood in groups, each holding a banner displaying slogans such as ‘Unity is Strength’, ‘Bande Mataram’ and ‘No Partition’. Among other resolutions, a ‘Boycott Resolution’ was also passed. People’s Reaction on October 16 – the Day of Mourning – The leaders declared it to be “a day of mourning” throughout Bengal. Every city, town and village now rang with the cry of ‘Bande Mataram’. Anand Mohan Bose, a veteran political leader, presided over a mammoth meeting at Kolkata. He lead the foundation of a Federation Hall, which was to be the symbol of the unity of Bengal, a meeting ground of the Eastern and Western Bengal. All the people gathered there took the vow of Swadeshi. Rabindranath Tagore wrote his famous patriotic song ‘Amar Sonar Bangla’ (My Golden Bengal), especially for the occasion. The Swadeshi and Boycott Movements – Swadeshi and Boycott were indeed complementary and supplementary to each other. The Boycott and foreign goods required that the markets should be flowing with home-made (Swadeshi) goods. In course of time it became more comprehensive. The Boycott movement thus tended to be openly and aggressively anti-British. It developed into a policy of “non-cooperation with the British in every field”. Impact or Significance of the Movement – The Movement failed to destabilize the Government, but it affected the life of the nation in the following ways: 1. Decline in the Import of British goods. 2. Stimulus to Indian Industries, such as the Bengal Chemical Factory started by P.C. Ray and establishment of Tata and Iron Steel Company. 3. An urge for National Education that resulted in the establishment of hundreds of National schools in Kolkata. 4. An outburst of literary activity that was sustained through writings in the Journals and newspapers like Kesari, the Mahratta and Yugantar. d. Surat Split of 1907 – Partition of Bengal led to the assertion of strong methods in Indian politics. The Kolkata Session of the Congress in 1906witnessed a sort of compromise between the leaders with moderate views and the study nationalists. Dadabhai Naoroji had been specially called from England by leaders with moderate views to preside over the Session. It was a clever move, the purpose being to prevent Tilak from becoming the President of the Congress. Why Congress was split into two Groups? The word ‘Swaraj’ was uttered for the first time by any Congress President so far. The leaders having moderate political opinions, were not happy with these developments. They wanted to insert a Clause in the Congress Constitution that Swaraj was to be achieved through constitutional means. Assertive nationalists, on the other hand, believed that unless they put strong pressure on the government, they would never achieve their objective. Swadeshi and Boycott were the basic components of their programme and methods of struggle. That is why the Congress got split in 1907 at Surat. The Surat Session – Assertive nationalists proposed the name of Lala Lajpat Rai as President of the Surat Session. The leaders believing in moderate policies proposed the name of Rash Behari Ghosh. It ended in a mess or failure. At the Surat Session the split in the Congress became official. e. The Repressive Measures of the Government – Since the movement for Boycott of British goods was gaining ground, the Government launched a campaign of repression. The Newspapers Act of 1908 was aimed at punishing those editors whose papers contained writings against British rule. “Police action was carried out with great vigour… school – children were arrested for singing national songs.” f. Objectives, Programme and methods of Struggle of Assertive Nationalists – The most aggressive among the nationalist leaders at this time was Bal Gangadhar Tilak. Also known as “Father of Indian Unrest”. Their Basic Beliefs and Objectives – 1. They had no faith in the British sense of justice and fair play. 2. Lajpat Rai wrote: “an Englishman hates or dislikes nothing like beggary. It is our duty to tell Englishmen that we are no longer beggars. 3. Their sturdy spirit provoked self-reliance and self-determination. The Ultimate Objective: As regards the ultimate objective, the assertive nationalists would not be satisfied with anything lower than Swaraj. Tilak said: “Swaraj is my birth-right and I will have it.” Their Programme and Methods of Struggle – 1. Revivalism: Tilak revived the Shivaji Festival in 1895. They presented Chandragupta Vikramaditya, Rana Pratap and Shivaji as national heroes, whose memory should be cherished. 2. Swadeshi: The Swadeshi idea was popularized by occasional bonfires of foreign cloth, salt and sugar. 3. Boycott: Boycott meant far more than a mere boycott of British goods. It also included the boycott of government services, honours and titles. 4. National Education: During the Swadeshi Movement many new educational institutions were started. The contents of National Education were as follows: (a) Secular Education, (b) Religious or Moral Education, (c) Political Education and (d) Vocational or Industrial Education. Their Achievements – First, they lived a life given to utmost suffering and sacrifice. Second, self-reliance was the watch-word of these sturdy nationalists. Third, the Swadeshi Movement gave a great stimulus to Indian industries. Fourth, they broadened the social base of the movement by extending it to the masses – the peasants, workers, women and youths. Fifth, they revived the ‘Shakti’ cult in India. Finally, they never bent to pressure of any kind. g. Differences Between the Early Nationalists and the Assertive Nationalists The Basic Beliefs – As regards the “basic beliefs”, the men with moderate views looked to England for inspiration and guidance. They had unlimited faith in the British goodness. But Tilak, Lajpat Rai, Bipin Chandra Pal and others had no faith in the goodness of the British. They cursed the British rule that brought misery to the people of India. Their Ultimate Object – The early nationalists talked of Swaraj as the goal of India. Before that, they had been agitating only for certain administrative and economic reforms. Assertive nationalists, on the contrary, did not aim at mere economic or administrative reforms. Their ideal was “absolute Swaraj”. Their Programmes and Methods of Struggle – The early nationalists carried on their work by means of “petitions, appeals, resolutions, meetings and deputations”. Their methods were described as “political mendicancy” because they believed in prayers and appeals. Sturdy nationalists, on the other hand, believed in Swadeshi and Boycott. h. Outstanding Leaders of Assertive Nationalism – Bal Gangadhar Tilak (1856-1920) – Tilak’s contribution to India’s freedom struggle was as follows: 1. Tilak’s Political Beliefs – Swaraj is My Birth Right and I will have it. 2. Bitter Attacks on Government: His weeklies, the Mahratta and the Kesari made bitter attacks on the Government. He said, “political rights will have to fought for.” They can only be got by strong pressure. 3. Means employed to expose Administration, to mobilize Masses and to arouse Nationalistic Passions: In 1893 he started the celebration of the Ganpati festival in Maharashtra. He revived the Shivaji festival in 1895. The object was to instill in the masses a spirit of discipline and patriotism. Tilak is known for organizing ‘akharas’(places for wrestling) and ‘Lathi Clubs’ in Maharashtra to make the youths brave to defy the British Raj. 4. His role in the Anti-Partition Movement: Partition of Bengal gave him a big opportunity to expose evil designs of the government. 5. Home Rule Movement: The year 1916 saw the establishment of the Home Rule Leagues in Madras (Chennai) and Maharashtra.
Recommended publications
  • The Social Life of Khadi: Gandhi's Experiments with the Indian
    The Social Life of Khadi: Gandhi’s Experiments with the Indian Economy, c. 1915-1965 by Leslie Hempson A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (History) in the University of Michigan 2018 Doctoral Committee: Associate Professor Farina Mir, Co-Chair Professor Mrinalini Sinha, Co-Chair Associate Professor William Glover Associate Professor Matthew Hull Leslie Hempson [email protected] ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5195-1605 © Leslie Hempson 2018 DEDICATION To my parents, whose love and support has accompanied me every step of the way ii TABLE OF CONTENTS DEDICATION ii LIST OF FIGURES iv LIST OF ACRONYMS v GLOSSARY OF KEY TERMS vi ABSTRACT vii INTRODUCTION 1 CHAPTER 1: THE AGRO-INDUSTRIAL DIVIDE 23 CHAPTER 2: ACCOUNTING FOR BUSINESS 53 CHAPTER 3: WRITING THE ECONOMY 89 CHAPTER 4: SPINNING EMPLOYMENT 130 CONCLUSION 179 APPENDIX: WEIGHTS AND MEASURES 183 BIBLIOGRAPHY 184 iii LIST OF FIGURES FIGURE 2.1 Advertisement for a list of businesses certified by AISA 59 3.1 A set of scales with coins used as weights 117 4.1 The ambar charkha in three-part form 146 4.2 Illustration from a KVIC album showing Mother India cradling the ambar 150 charkha 4.3 Illustration from a KVIC album showing giant hand cradling the ambar charkha 151 4.4 Illustration from a KVIC album showing the ambar charkha on a pedestal with 152 a modified version of the motto of the Indian republic on the front 4.5 Illustration from a KVIC album tracing the charkha to Mohenjo Daro 158 4.6 Illustration from a KVIC album tracing
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 9. the Programme and Achievements of the Early Nationalist
    Chapter 9. The Programme and Achievements of the Early Nationalist Very Short Questions Question 1: Name the sections into which the Congress was divided from its very inception. Answer: The Moderates and the Assertives. Question 2: During which period did the Moderates dominate the Congress? Answer: The Moderates dominated the Congress from 1885 to 1905. Question 3: Name any three important leaders of the Moderates. Or Name two leaders of the Moderates. Answer: The three important leaders of the moderates were: (i) Dadabhai Naoroji (ii) Surendra Nath Banerjee (iii) Gopal Krishna Gokhale. Question 4: What were the early nationalists called? Answer: They were called the ‘Moderates’. Question 5: Why were the early nationalists called ‘Moderates’? Answer: The early nationalists had full faith in the sense of justice of the British. For this reason their demands as well as there methods help them in winning the title of ‘Moderates’. Question 6: Who were the Moderates ? Answer: They were the early nationalists, who believed that the British always show a sense of justice in all spheres of their Government. Question 7: State any two demands of the Moderates in respect of economic reforms. Answer: (i) Protection of Indian industries. (ii) Reduction of land revenue. Question 8: State any two demands of the Moderates in respect of political reforms. Answer: (i) Expansion of Legislative Councils. (ii) Separation between the Executive and the Judiciary. Question 9: Mention two demands of the Moderates in respect of administrative reforms. Answer: (i) Indianisation of Civil Services. (ii) Repeal of Arms Act. Question 10: What did the Moderates advocate in the field of civil rights? Answer: The Moderates opposed the curbs imposed on freedom of speech, press and association.
    [Show full text]
  • Seeking Offense: Censorship and the Constitution of Democratic Politics in India
    SEEKING OFFENSE: CENSORSHIP AND THE CONSTITUTION OF DEMOCRATIC POLITICS IN INDIA A Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Cornell University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy by Ameya Shivdas Balsekar August 2009 © 2009 Ameya Shivdas Balsekar SEEKING OFFENSE: CENSORSHIP AND THE CONSTITUTION OF DEMOCRATIC POLITICS IN INDIA Ameya Shivdas Balsekar, Ph. D. Cornell University 2009 Commentators have frequently suggested that India is going through an “age of intolerance” as writers, artists, filmmakers, scholars and journalists among others have been targeted by institutions of the state as well as political parties and interest groups for hurting the sentiments of some section of Indian society. However, this age of intolerance has coincided with a period that has also been characterized by the “deepening” of Indian democracy, as previously subordinated groups have begun to participate more actively and substantively in democratic politics. This project is an attempt to understand the reasons for the persistence of illiberalism in Indian politics, particularly as manifest in censorship practices. It argues that one of the reasons why censorship has persisted in India is that having the “right to censor” has come be established in the Indian constitutional order’s negotiation of multiculturalism as a symbol of a cultural group’s substantive political empowerment. This feature of the Indian constitutional order has made the strategy of “seeking offense” readily available to India’s politicians, who understand it to be an efficacious way to discredit their competitors’ claims of group representativeness within the context of democratic identity politics.
    [Show full text]
  • Scientific Communities in the Developing World Scientific Communities in the Developing World
    Scientific Communities in the Developing World Scientific Communities in the Developing World Edited by jacques Caillard V.V. Krishna Roland Waast Sage Publications New Delhiflhousand Oaks/London Copyright @) Jacques Gaillard, V.V. Krishna and Roland Waast, 1997. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or by any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. First published in 1997 by Sage Publications India Pvt Ltd M-32, Greater Kailash Market I New Delhi 110 048 Sage Publications Inc Sage Publications Ltd 2455 Teller Road 6 Bonhill Street Thousand Oaks, California 91320 London EC2A 4PU Published by Tejeshwar Singh for Sage Publications India Pvt Ltd, phototypeset by Pagewell Photosetters, Pondicherry and printed at Chaman Enterprises, Delhi. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Scientific communities in the developing world I edited by Jacques Gaillard, V.V. Krishna, Roland Waast. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. 1. Science-Developing countries--History. 2. Science-Social aspect- Developing countries--History. I. Gaillard, Jacques, 1951- . 11. Krishna, V.V. 111. Waast, Roland, 1940- . Q127.2.S44 306.4'5'091724--dc20 1996 9617807 ISBN: 81-7036565-1 (India-hb) &8039-9330-7 (US-hb) Sage Production Editor: Sumitra Srinivasan Contents List of Tables List of Figures Preface 1. Introduction: Scientific Communities in the Developing World Jacques Gaillard, V.V. Krishna and Roland Waast Part 1: Scientific Communities in Africa 2. Sisyphus or the Scientific Communities of Algeria Ali El Kenz and Roland Waast 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Modern History – 10 Years' Papers Analysis
    VISION IAS www.visionias.in MODERN HISTORY – 10 YEARS’ PAPERS ANALYSIS Topic No. of Questions Acts 10 Advent of Europeans 3 Congress Sessions/Presidents 5 Capitalist Movement 1 Communalism 1 Economic Critique of Colonialism 4 Gandhian Movements 15 Governor General 2 Land Tenure System during British Rule 5 Left Movement 1 Partition of Bengal & Swadeshi Movement 7 Pre-Congress Associations 2 Princely States 1 Personality Based 5 Socio-Religious Movement 4 Transfer of Power 6 Working Class Movement 3 Revolutionary Movements 1 Tribal Revolts, Civil Rebellions and Peasant Movement 2 Twenty-Eight Months of Congress Rule 2 Miscellaneous 9 Total 89 1 www.visionias.in ©Vision IAS S. N. Year TOPIC SUB-TOPIC QUESTION ANSWER 1 2017 Acts GOI Act, 1919 In the context of Indian history, the principle of ‘Dyarchy (diarchy)’ refers to D (a) Division of the central legislature into two houses. (b) Introductions of double government i.e., Central and Statement governments. (c) Having two sets of rulers; one in London and another in Delhi. (d) Division of the subjects delegated to the provinces into two categories. 2 2017 Miscellaneous With reference to Indian freedom struggle, consider the following events: C 1. Mutiny in Royal Indian Navy 2. Quit Indian Movement launched 3. Second Round Table Conference What is the correct chronological sequence of the above events? (a) 1-2-3 (b) 2-1-3 (c) 3-2-1 (d) 3-1-2 3 2017 Princely States The object of the Butler Committee of 1927 was to D (a) Define the jurisdiction of the Central and Provincial Governments.
    [Show full text]
  • The Emergence of Nationalism a Nation in the Making
    www.selectialindia.com Police teargas demonstrators during the Quit India movement THE EMERGENCE OF NATIONALISM Though the elements of nationalism were known to Indians, yet it practically developed in the British period. There were many reasons for it. The British ruled over India in their self-interest. Gradually Indians realized their motives. They were fed up and were opporessed by alien rule. The British attempts to interfere in religion and social practices such as adoption infuriated the Indians and their anger resulted in the armed revolt of 1857. The British crushed the revolt but they could not crush the spirit of nationalism among Indians. The dissatisfaction with British rule intensified in the 1870s and 1880s. The Arms Act was passed in 1878, disallowing Indians from possessing arms. In the same year the Vernacular Press Act was also enacted in an effort to silence those who were critical of the government. The Act allowed the government to confiscate the assets of newspapers including their printing presses if the newspapers published anything that was found “objectionable”. In 1883, there was a furore over the attempt by the government to introduce the Ilbert Bill. The bill provided for the trial of British or European persons by Indians, and sought equality between British and Indian judges in the country. But when white opposition forced the government to withdraw the bill, Indians were enraged. The event highlighted the racial attitudes of the British in India. The need for an all-India organisation of educated Indians had been felt since 1880, but the Ilbert Bill controversy deepened this desire.
    [Show full text]
  • Lokmanya Tilak's Editorials for Mass Education
    International Journal of Disaster Recovery and Business Continuity Vol.11, No. 1 (2020), pp. 572-590 LOKMANYA TILAK’S EDITORIALS FOR MASS EDUCATION Dr. Deepak J. Tilak Vice Chancellor, Tilak Maharasthra Vidyapeeth, Pune Dr. Geetali D. Tilak Professor, Department of Mass Communication Tilak Maharashtra Vidyapeeth, Pune Abstract Lokmanya B.G. Tilak wanted to educate people about drain theory, inequality, injustice, poverty and colonial dual policy for the common man. He realized that common man should know all these facts and should be aware of the injustice to them and to know the parademic situation around them which will create awareness for his birth right – Swaraj. Lokmanya Tilak’s Editorials in Kesari was a fight against the British Government and created unrest against British colonial policies. This research paper is confined to 1890 to 1920 and media writing of the great patriot Lokmanya B.G. Tilak who wrote various articles in his newspaper “Kesari” to educate the masses about need of Swarajya and means of development of India. Lokmanya Tilak was a great orator, he used his lectures as a storytelling tool to educate the masses about need of Swarajya and means of development of India. Lokmanya Tilak had the strength to influentially express the subject matter. Thoughtful topic, proper words and pragmatic examples were the soul of his lectures. Lokmanya Tilak had very powerful skills to analyze the minute and enlighten very minute details of any subject, which always reflected in his lectures. Keywords: Lokmanya Tilak, Lokmanya Tilak’s editorials, articles, Kesari, Media, Education, British Government Introduction: Lokmanya Bal Gangadhar Tilak was multi-faceted personality in the 19th century in the freedom struggle also known as a spokesman of Swarajya, i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Modern Indian Political Thought Ii Modern Indian Political Thought Modern Indian Political Thought Text and Context
    Modern Indian Political Thought ii Modern Indian Political Thought Modern Indian Political Thought Text and Context Bidyut Chakrabarty Rajendra Kumar Pandey Copyright © Bidyut Chakrabarty and Rajendra Kumar Pandey, 2009 All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or utilised in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or by any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. First published in 2009 by SAGE Publications India Pvt Ltd B1/I-1 Mohan Cooperative Industrial Area Mathura Road, New Delhi 110 044, India www.sagepub.in SAGE Publications Inc 2455 Teller Road Thousand Oaks, California 91320, USA SAGE Publications Ltd 1 Oliver’s Yard, 55 City Road London EC1Y 1SP, United Kingdom SAGE Publications Asia-Pacifi c Pte Ltd 33 Pekin Street #02-01 Far East Square Singapore 048763 Published by Vivek Mehra for SAGE Publications India Pvt Ltd, typeset in 10/12 pt Palatino by Star Compugraphics Private Limited, Delhi and printed at Chaman Enterprises, New Delhi. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Chakrabarty, Bidyut, 1958– Modern Indian political thought: text and context/Bidyut Chakrabarty, Rajendra Kumar Pandey. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. 1. Political science—India—Philosophy. 2. Nationalism—India. 3. Self- determination, National—India. 4. Great Britain—Colonies—India. 5. India— Colonisation. 6. India—Politics and government—1919–1947. 7. India— Politics and government—1947– 8. India—Politics and government— 21st century. I. Pandey, Rajendra Kumar. II. Title. JA84.I4C47 320.0954—dc22 2009 2009025084 ISBN: 978-81-321-0225-0 (PB) The SAGE Team: Reema Singhal, Vikas Jain, Sanjeev Kumar Sharma and Trinankur Banerjee To our parents who introduced us to the world of learning vi Modern Indian Political Thought Contents Preface xiii Introduction xv PART I: REVISITING THE TEXTS 1.
    [Show full text]
  • HISTORY of INDIA from 1885 to 1984 Dr. A. RAVISANKAR, Ph.D., UNIT-I I: CONGRESS from 1885 to 1905
    ALLIED: HISTORY OF INDIA FROM 1885 TO 1984 Dr. A. RAVISANKAR, Ph.D., UNIT-I I: CONGRESS FROM 1885 TO 1905 1. Formed in 1885 by Allan Octavian Hume, a retired British civil servant. 2. Other founding members include Dadabhai Naoroji (Born on September 4, 1825) and Dinshaw Wacha. 3. The first session was held in Bombay under the presidency of Womesh Chandra Bonnerjee in 1885. 4. The first session was attended by 72 delegates from across the country. 5. Viceroy of India at the time was Lord Dufferin who gave his permission to Hume for the first session. 6. The Congress was formed with the intention of discussing problems faced by the people of the country irrespective of caste, creed, religion or language. 7. It was basically a movement of the upper and middle class, western-educated Indians in its moderate phase. 8. The second session of the Congress was held in Calcutta in 1886 followed by the third in Madras in 1887. Moderate Phase (1885 to 1905) • The moderate phase of the Congress (or the national movement) was dominated by the ‘moderates’. • They were people who believed in British justice and were loyal to them. Aims and demands • Education of the masses and organising public opinion, make people aware of their rights. • Indian representation in the Executive Council and in the Indian Council in London. • Reform of the legislative councils. • Separation of the executive from the judiciary. • Decreased land revenue tax and ending peasant oppression. • After 1892, raised the slogan, “No taxation without representation.” • Reduced spending on the army.
    [Show full text]
  • Contributions of Lala Har Dayal As an Intellectual and Revolutionary
    CONTRIBUTIONS OF LALA HAR DAYAL AS AN INTELLECTUAL AND REVOLUTIONARY ABSTRACT THESIS SUBMITTED FOR THE AWARD OF THE DEGREE OF ^ntiat ai pijtl000pi{g IN }^ ^ HISTORY By MATT GAOR CENTRE OF ADVANCED STUDY DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY ALIGARH MUSLIM UNIVERSITY ALIGARH (INDIA) 2007 ,,» '*^d<*'/. ' ABSTRACT India owes to Lala Har Dayal a great debt of gratitude. What he did intotality to his mother country is yet to be acknowledged properly. The paradox ridden Har Dayal - a moody idealist, intellectual, who felt an almost mystical empathy with the masses in India and America. He kept the National Independence flame burning not only in India but outside too. In 1905 he went to England for Academic pursuits. But after few years he had leave England for his revolutionary activities. He stayed in America and other European countries for 25 years and finally returned to England where he wrote three books. Har Dayal's stature was so great that its very difficult to put him under one mould. He was visionary who all through his life devoted to Boddhi sattava doctrine, rational interpretation of religions and sharing his erudite knowledge for the development of self culture. The proposed thesis seeks to examine the purpose of his returning to intellectual pursuits in England. Simultaneously the thesis also analyses the contemporary relevance of his works which had a common thread of humanism, rationalism and scientific temper. Relevance for his ideas is still alive as it was 50 years ago. He was true a patriotic who dreamed independence for his country. He was pioneer for developing science in laymen and scientific temper among youths.
    [Show full text]
  • Bipin Chandra Pal
    Bipin Chandra Pal March 15, 2021 In news : Recently, Union Minister of Information and Broadcasting (IB) inaugurated a photo-exhibition to showcase the struggles of various freedom fighters Bipin Chandra Pal is one of them A brief History of Bipin Chandra Pal He was an Indian nationalist, writer, orator, social reformer and Indian independence movement freedom fighter Birth: 7th November 1858, Habiganj Sylhet district, Bangladesh Bipin ji He was one third of the “Lal Bal Pal” triumvirat Education: He studied and taught at the Church Mission Society College (now the St. Paul’s Cathedral Mission College), an affiliated college of the University of Calcutta Brahmo Samaj: After his first wife died, he married a widow and joined the Brahmo Samaj He was also associated with Indian National Congress and India House His Contributions: He known as the Father of Revolutionary Thoughts in India and was one of the freedom fighters of India Pal stood against the partition of Bengal by the colonial British government. 1887: He made a strong plea for repeal of the Arms Act which was discriminatory in nature He was one of the main architects of the Swadeshi movement along with Sri Aurobindo. He popularized the concepts of swadeshi (exclusive use of Indian-made goods) and swaraj His programme consisted of Swadeshi, boycott and national education. He preached and encouraged the use of Swadeshi and the boycott of foreign goods to eradicate poverty and unemployment. Bipin wanted to remove social evils from the form and arouse the feelings of nationalism through national criticism. He also set up a school called Anushilan Samiti and began a tour of the country to propagate his philosophy.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ideological Differences Between Moderates and Extremists in the Indian National Movement with Special Reference to Surendranath Banerjea and Lajpat Rai
    1 The Ideological Differences between Moderates and Extremists in the Indian National Movement with Special Reference to Surendranath Banerjea and Lajpat Rai 1885-1919 ■by Daniel Argov Thesis submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy, in the University of London* School of Oriental and African Studies* June 1964* ProQuest Number: 11010545 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a com plete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. uest ProQuest 11010545 Published by ProQuest LLC(2018). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States C ode Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106- 1346 2 ABSTRACT Surendranath Banerjea was typical of the 'moderates’ in the Indian National Congress while Lajpat Rai typified the 'extremists'* This thesis seeks to portray critical political biographies of Surendranath Banerjea and of Lajpat Rai within a general comparative study of the moderates and the extremists, in an analysis of political beliefs and modes of political action in the Indian national movement, 1883-1919* It attempts to mirror the attitude of mind of the two nationalist leaders against their respective backgrounds of thought and experience, hence events in Bengal and the Punjab loom larger than in other parts of India* "The Extremists of to-day will be Moderates to-morrow, just as the Moderates of to-day were the Extremists of yesterday.” Bal Gangadhar Tilak, 2 January 190? ABBREVIATIONS B.N.]T.R.
    [Show full text]